He does not give the right answer. question was it is "because of" Islam that female foeticide rate is large. ot that Islam "says" to kill female or something. It may be because it says many things about females , their dress , their behaviour, their places of occupancy etc. which makes life so difficult for females.
A small nitpick: sun spots were known since the 1600s, as was the rotation of the Sun around its own axis. Galileo observed and drew them. I don't know what schoolbooks he's been reading, this is old news.
@StrikaAmaru Sun does revolve around its own axis and own orbit
A latest news dedicated to your knowledge
wonder what source youre getting your infos from
if the sun own orbit around its axis it wont create an inward gravitational curvature in the space-time and all earths would have been spreaded out from the solar system
@tafwolf I have not denied the Sun rotates around its own axis, I merely pointed out this was known since the 1600s, from observations made by Galileo.
Regarding your last paragraph, I'm not certain what you wished to say, but was your claim that solar rotation is the cause for the existence of the Sun's gravity well? Because that is definitely not true, the inward gravitational curvature is caused by the Sun's mass, and would be the same whether or not the Sun is spinning.
@tafwolf (Re: gravity wells) Yes, but the difference is barely there; and it's much more intense close to the star than far away from it. I suppose it could be interpreted in terms of acceleration; the picture I had in my head was that space is slightly twisted in the same direction to the rotation. For example, the Sun twists Mercury's orbit into a flower-like pattern, instead of the standard ellipse; the shift is of 43 arcseconds per century. The other planets get twisted too, but much less.
@tafwolf (Re: universal expansion) The cause of it is still unknown; there are a few possible causes, but nothing certain. One of the few things that *is* known about it is that the presence of a gravity well slows it down. There is no expansion measured within galaxies, for instance, only between different galaxies. So it doesn't seem to be caused by gravitation, either spinning or not.
@StrikaAmaru I am currently involved in a research under a professor from physics department of stanford university.
I dont know if this news of gravitational spinning well went worldwide, but this is the fact that has been coming out from the sets data we have collected for the past years
@tafwolf "I am currently involved in a research under a professor from physics department of stanford university." In light of your extremely bad knowledge base, and your shaky grasp of English grammar, I'll have to express my very intense skepticism regarding that claim. Or, in more prosaic verbiage, I'm calling bullshit.
@StrikaAmaru and the casue is still not unknown. It has been said that the universe is expanding from the force and speed it took place during the big bang which is at the speed of light. it has been inferred the universe it self has been now expanding more than speed of light being feed by the rotational gravitational well and heading towards the big crunch
@tafwolf I don't know from where you get you data, but it seems to be either outdated, or terribly wrong.
I'll say it again: GRAVITY DOES NOT CAUSE EXPANSION. Gravity slows down the expansion of the Universe, locally, in places where there is enough matter to cause gravity. Between galaxies, where there isn't any matter, expansion continues, and accelerates.
The Big Crunch will never happen; the math behind it is well known, and it would require about 3 times more matter than exists.
@tafwolf (2) The Big Crunch was proposed as a possible fate of the Universe (alongside equilibrium and infinite expansion), but no sane astronomer would categorically state it's going to happen, before measuring how much matter the Universe contains. Now they did measure it, and it's going to be infinite expansion.
And BTW: The Universe expands now at a rate of 50 per million. So far, no part of it is moving (relative to us) at above the speed of light, though eventually this will happen.
Zakir Naik is an islamic buffoon. This guy can not even work as assistant of shit collector.
TheWersum 18 hours ago
Dr. Zakir is one of the greatest scholar, extremely lucky to be his contemporary.
LingaShaved 1 month ago
naik is such a charlatan!
ZobaK1 1 month ago
He does not give the right answer. question was it is "because of" Islam that female foeticide rate is large. ot that Islam "says" to kill female or something. It may be because it says many things about females , their dress , their behaviour, their places of occupancy etc. which makes life so difficult for females.
avssr1786 3 months ago
@avssr1786 try askin a muslim girl first... before judgin ok?
tizzy10001 3 weeks ago
Nasir is an asshole nothing more ....
Titubarua22 3 months ago
great work
khanpreston1 3 months ago
A small nitpick: sun spots were known since the 1600s, as was the rotation of the Sun around its own axis. Galileo observed and drew them. I don't know what schoolbooks he's been reading, this is old news.
StrikaAmaru 4 months ago
@StrikaAmaru Sun does revolve around its own axis and own orbit
A latest news dedicated to your knowledge
wonder what source youre getting your infos from
if the sun own orbit around its axis it wont create an inward gravitational curvature in the space-time and all earths would have been spreaded out from the solar system
get the facts right dude
tafwolf 3 months ago
@tafwolf I have not denied the Sun rotates around its own axis, I merely pointed out this was known since the 1600s, from observations made by Galileo.
Regarding your last paragraph, I'm not certain what you wished to say, but was your claim that solar rotation is the cause for the existence of the Sun's gravity well? Because that is definitely not true, the inward gravitational curvature is caused by the Sun's mass, and would be the same whether or not the Sun is spinning.
StrikaAmaru 3 months ago
@StrikaAmaru different orientation/ rotation of the mass gives you different gravity well
standing mass produce different than that of a rotating one
even from classical mechanics linear and rotational motion are different.
Same but a little different goes for relativity
while you have standing mass, it just produces the gravity well
while you have rotating mass, away from center it creates an acceleration in the space-time which causes it spending
thats how we got expending universe
tafwolf 3 months ago
@tafwolf (Re: gravity wells) Yes, but the difference is barely there; and it's much more intense close to the star than far away from it. I suppose it could be interpreted in terms of acceleration; the picture I had in my head was that space is slightly twisted in the same direction to the rotation. For example, the Sun twists Mercury's orbit into a flower-like pattern, instead of the standard ellipse; the shift is of 43 arcseconds per century. The other planets get twisted too, but much less.
StrikaAmaru 3 months ago
@tafwolf (Re: universal expansion) The cause of it is still unknown; there are a few possible causes, but nothing certain. One of the few things that *is* known about it is that the presence of a gravity well slows it down. There is no expansion measured within galaxies, for instance, only between different galaxies. So it doesn't seem to be caused by gravitation, either spinning or not.
StrikaAmaru 3 months ago
@StrikaAmaru I am currently involved in a research under a professor from physics department of stanford university.
I dont know if this news of gravitational spinning well went worldwide, but this is the fact that has been coming out from the sets data we have collected for the past years
tafwolf 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tafwolf "I am currently involved in a research under a professor from physics department of stanford university." In light of your extremely bad knowledge base, and your shaky grasp of English grammar, I'll have to express my very intense skepticism regarding that claim. Or, in more prosaic verbiage, I'm calling bullshit.
StrikaAmaru 3 months ago
@StrikaAmaru and the casue is still not unknown. It has been said that the universe is expanding from the force and speed it took place during the big bang which is at the speed of light. it has been inferred the universe it self has been now expanding more than speed of light being feed by the rotational gravitational well and heading towards the big crunch
tafwolf 3 months ago
@tafwolf I don't know from where you get you data, but it seems to be either outdated, or terribly wrong.
I'll say it again: GRAVITY DOES NOT CAUSE EXPANSION. Gravity slows down the expansion of the Universe, locally, in places where there is enough matter to cause gravity. Between galaxies, where there isn't any matter, expansion continues, and accelerates.
The Big Crunch will never happen; the math behind it is well known, and it would require about 3 times more matter than exists.
StrikaAmaru 3 months ago
@tafwolf (2) The Big Crunch was proposed as a possible fate of the Universe (alongside equilibrium and infinite expansion), but no sane astronomer would categorically state it's going to happen, before measuring how much matter the Universe contains. Now they did measure it, and it's going to be infinite expansion.
And BTW: The Universe expands now at a rate of 50 per million. So far, no part of it is moving (relative to us) at above the speed of light, though eventually this will happen.
StrikaAmaru 3 months ago