Okay. This is a joke video, and the reason it's called 'the most logical argument against same-sex marriage', is because it IS the most logical argument against same-sex marriage. Because it makes absolutely no sense. The joke is that there is no logical argument against same-sex marriage. It's not logical in the slightest to stop it. My god. How can people be taking this seriously? It's infuriating. It's. A. Joke.
I laughed through this whole thing, that got pretty dirty XD I love how he tried to use fruit to make this arguement, but as funny as it was, I still don't see what the problem is with same-sex marriage. If a guy in Norway can marry his cat and it is legal in some places to have sex while dressed up and behaving like furry animals, or while wrapped up in leather and getting whipped, I really don't see why same-sex marriage is such a problem
But already many protestant churches recognise gay marriage and even perform it. I only think that gay marriage should be pushed for legally because those civil partnerships are still not recognised by some people/institutions. It's also because it appears that they are being denied a right to something that they may even believe in. Those homosexuals who believe in god are no less Christian than heterosexuals, and should be accorded all the same spiritual rights. They should have the choice.
idk whats wrong with ppl that supports same sex marriage i know one thing that in the world r more ppl like me that dont like that shit and less of those who thinks its ok u dont need to much to see that is wrong something in there just tell me if any of those same sex partners can have baby in natural ways NO so whyyy u want to get like you are a guy and love another guy ridiculousness
@MrAmemaX "idk whats wrong with ppl that supports same sex marriage" There isn't.
"i know one thing that in the world r more ppl like me that dont like that shit and less of those who thinks its ok" You don't know that and even if you did it is an argument from popularity fallacy.
People also used to think the earth was flat, didn't mean they were right.
@MrAmemaX "just tell me if any of those same sex partners can have baby in natural ways " They can, nature does not require parents to be in a relationship.
Also, tell me, are you against infertile people and people who do not wish to have children as well?
"NO so whyyy u want to get like you are a guy and love another guy` Because love and sex are about more than just procreation.
Only idiots like you make such fallacious and asinine comments.
that was really funny but i still support same sex marrige. i think that people should have the right to marry the person that they love even if they are of the same sex.
@thomaseshuis Well I don't believe homosexuality is morally right, homosexuals are not entitled the right to marry in a church and house of God. It all depends how you define marriage, but in a religious sense it should is rightfully forbidden across the world.
@JazReviews "It all depends how you define marriage, but in a religious sense it should is rightfully forbidden across the world."
Apparently you have not thoroughly read my comment. Your religion is not the only religion in existence, your specific branch of Christianity is not the only one.
Many religious denominations disagree with you. It isn't simple as you think it is.
@thomaseshuis Of course not, I'm not religious myself yet the basis from which argue is a Core-Christian, times change and evidently so does religion, but I speak from the traditional sense of the word, marriage.
@JazReviews Traditionally, marriage had nothing to do with religion. Binding legal unions or partnerships have been around for much longer. It is rare to find old same-sex marriages is that, for much of our history, the human race has been unable to overcome its prejudice against what it doesn't fully comprehend. As religion, especially monotheistic ones, became more prevalent across the globe, gaining more influence in politics, so legal ceremonies were absorbed into it.
@JazReviews "Of course not, I'm not religious myself" Then why bring up the flawed and defunct argument from religion?
"yet the basis from which argue is a Core-Christian" Why? You claim you're not religious.
"but I speak from the traditional sense of the word, marriage" That which we call marriage today existed long before christianity. Just like christmas, despite it's name is not a christian holiday, marriage is not a christian invention nor institution.
@JazReviews Morally right? Morals are arbitrary, entirely a concept of the human race; just as religion is. As such, there is no solid law governing what is morally right and wrong, and therefore you cannot found any statement on such an unstable structure. Just say you don't agree with it personally, people at least appreciate honesty. And, for your information, Same-sex marriages are performed and recognised in a number of predominantly Christian countries and Christian Sects.
@Xyalon Oh I know, yet some would argue that law still needs to reflect a sense of morality, and unforunatly morality can be closely tied to Religion. Therefore to allow gay marriage in the religious sense of the word is to forget the importance of Adam & Eve and to ignore the bible in it's entirety, which is to ignore the fundemental religious beliefs that have been formed over the last few thousand years.
@JazReviews Yes, it can be argued that the law should reflect a sense of morality, however morals are personal as well as cultural, and therefore can vary and have no absolute rigidity. Laws also vary, and can be ignored in certain cases just as morals are. It is considered morally and legally incorrect to kill someone, but if that someone is trying to kill you then it can be deemed acceptable. In all honesty, I doubt that forgetting the bible in its entirety would be a bad thing.
@Xyalon I know not, I assumed marriage in the strictest sense of the world was the joining of a man and his wife, traditionally.
Why must we push for gay marriage when civil partnerships exist to grant all of those legal rights (depending on where you come from). "Marriages" between homosexuals should be completely detached from religion, the religious ceremony of a Protestant/Catholic marriage should not apply to same sex couples.
@JazReviews "I assumed marriage in the strictest sense of the world was the joining of a man and his wife, traditionally." Which as we have shown you is false.
"Why must we push for gay marriage when civil partnerships exist to grant all of those legal rights (depending on where you come from)" You already admit that they don't grant the same rights.
Furthermore, religion does not hold the patent to word 'marriage', secular people use it as well.
@JazReviews "the religious ceremony of a Protestant/Catholic marriage should not apply to same sex couples." They already do within certain catholic and protestant denominations.
Again, should that not be up to the individual churches?
@JazReviews i see how you say that it is "morally wrong" but i dont carry your religion, and neither does a lot of people in the world.. marriage should be between two people that love each other, they have changed marriage before, why not again?
@JazReviews Arguments against any other form of marriage are irrelevant.
Unless you can make a valid argument against same-sex marriage, there's no reason to ban it.
What you are doing is the same as racist people arguing against interracial marriage. Using logical fallacies like slippery slope arguments and other scaremongering tactics.
@JazReviews all that i'm saying is that when people are in love, regardless of sexual orientation, they should have the right to get married. the statement stands for it's self.
For those of you lost, this video makes absolutely no logical sense. Showing how all the anti gay marriage arguments make no logical sense b/c this is supposed to be "The Most Logical Argument Against Same-Sex Marriage". The video is a joke, they are NOT against same sex marriage. they are supporting it by poking fun at all the anti same sex marriage arguments
Powerful. Stupid fruits and stupid gay potatos. If a straight banana was involved it be better. Cuz it's long and phallic and totally not gay at all because it's straight but really curvy. Ugh...go straights!
I'm white, 5'5 and my eyes are brown. I can't change the fact that I'm white. I can't change my height. But I can hide my eye color, how?contacts. People judge my brown eyes, they all love blue eyes. So, I got blue contacts. No one can tell I have brown eyes, so they don't take time out of their day to pick on me or tell me I'm full of shit for having brown eyes EVEN THOUGH I CAN'T HELP WHAT COLOR THEY ARE.
Why are straight men ok with having shit on the ends of their dicks when they have anal sex with their female partners? Oh, just so you know, there's one thing called enema.
@pf91rodman Marriage still needs to be conserved. You can't just let anyone marry anybody/anything as it defeats the whole principle of marriage. If the government doesn't do anything regarding marriage, the whole concept will be destroyed.
Hey I'm with you, I don't think the definition of marriage should be changed. But I''m not a fan of using the government to impose our views onto other people. The same goes for homosexuals who want to use the government force churches against their will to perform gay marriage ceremonies.
@organist12345 'You can't just let anyone marry anybody/anything as it defeats the whole principle of marriage.' There is however no good reason to ban same-sex marriage.
'The same goes for homosexuals who want to use the government force churches against their will to perform gay marriage ceremonies. ' That would be a minority. Furthermore all the laws in both the U.S. and European countries have only been about state marriage, not religious marriage.
Also, the US Supreme Court has ruled no less than 14 times throughout the last 100 years, that marriage is a fundamental civil right. Even a 75 year old convicted child molester, currently incarcerated for life cannot be legally denied a license to marry (unless of course he's jailed in one of the 45 states that don't allow marriage equality, and his fiance is a man)
@organist12345 Can you provide a single example of your point, how marriage equality will destroy the concept of marriage? I've never heard one, and I'd really like to.
@hominyboy Are you really that callous? The only reason marriage came to existance in the first place was for a union between one man, and one woman, and to accomodate and encourage procreation. If we follow the view of "marriage equality", then we should allow anyone to get married with anything. ie, multiple partners, people of the same sex, animals, etc. This entirely defeats the whole point of marriage. It only takes a small amount of common sense to see this.
@organist12345 If I remember correctly marriage was generally an economic institution, then Christianity came and molded it to what they wanted, which is cool, but it's fallacious to say that "it's our true and original concept"
@organist12345 'The only reason marriage came to existance in the first place was for a union between one man, and one woman,' Please provide peer-reviewed evidence that the first marriage was for this reason and not for financial gain or love. 'and to accomodate and encourage procreation.' Again, provide peer-reviewed and scientific evidence for this ridiculous statement.
@organist12345 'then we should allow anyone to get married with anything'
'multiple partners' Indeed, there is no logical nor other reasonable argument to prohibit this for consenting people.
'people of the same sex' Also no reason to prohibit this.
'animals' Animals can't consent, therefore they cannot marry. This logically flawed argument has been debunked so many times, you should really stop using it.
@organist12345 'his entirely defeats the whole point of marriage.' You have failed to provide evidence for an eternal and unchanging 'point' or definition of marriage.
'It only takes a small amount of common sense to see this. ' No, it takes a small ammount of commons sense that your arguments are based on appeals to emotion and a false and unsupported view of reality.
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
•1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
•1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
•Lev. 18:22, "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."1
•Lev. 20:13, "If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltness is upon them"
Well. He has me. Now I understand the wrong.
ZoeWrightable 2 days ago
Because of this video, I'm voting for same sex marriage.
HeadmasterFox 1 week ago 2
Funny as hell; but I still think is sad that this is the most logical argument against same sex marriage D:
MrFortiori 1 week ago
But, aren't fruits basically a womb? And a potato is just a plant-battery?
So gays shouldn't get married because one shouldn't put batteries into wombs?
Yes, I agree.
Cubelarooso 2 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
WHAT IS AIR.
cabose1993 2 weeks ago
I can't breathe I'm laughing too hard...........
That is the kind of support that will get me the right some day!! That's devoted dude!! = )
TGIAustin911 2 weeks ago
DUDE. Dude. I love you.
greeneggsandqueso 2 weeks ago
Holy god, I have not laughed so much in a long time
wyv3rn1 2 weeks ago
O-O I TOTALY GET IT NOW. (Not. Still, fruitpr0n FTW)
Satankitteh 2 weeks ago
100% against the gay marriage! and 200% against the adoption by gay couples!
smokcho 2 weeks ago
Wow, It's all so clear to me now.
POTATOES JOIN WITH ME AND WE WILL FIGHT THE FRUIT GOVERNMENT!
multifunctionwebcast 2 weeks ago
Fuckin Gay Potato!
austinbalfany 3 weeks ago
That man is very, very repressed.
TenebraeOleander 3 weeks ago
Okay. This is a joke video, and the reason it's called 'the most logical argument against same-sex marriage', is because it IS the most logical argument against same-sex marriage. Because it makes absolutely no sense. The joke is that there is no logical argument against same-sex marriage. It's not logical in the slightest to stop it. My god. How can people be taking this seriously? It's infuriating. It's. A. Joke.
Notepaddle 3 weeks ago 18
Troll vid.
...either that or this guy has sociopathic-grade problems.
EvdogMusic 3 weeks ago
I laughed through this whole thing, that got pretty dirty XD I love how he tried to use fruit to make this arguement, but as funny as it was, I still don't see what the problem is with same-sex marriage. If a guy in Norway can marry his cat and it is legal in some places to have sex while dressed up and behaving like furry animals, or while wrapped up in leather and getting whipped, I really don't see why same-sex marriage is such a problem
DrRichardzz 3 weeks ago
Did I just watch fruit porn?
pidgeonsandpiearetas 3 weeks ago 44
these fucking comments man
wow
just wow
Notepaddle 3 weeks ago 8
I got a boner.
outformyown 3 weeks ago 4
i love how people are taking this serously.
Flagdread 3 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos 2
I liked the part where the orange and the potato, but not the apple.
Chartreusesky 3 weeks ago 3
But already many protestant churches recognise gay marriage and even perform it. I only think that gay marriage should be pushed for legally because those civil partnerships are still not recognised by some people/institutions. It's also because it appears that they are being denied a right to something that they may even believe in. Those homosexuals who believe in god are no less Christian than heterosexuals, and should be accorded all the same spiritual rights. They should have the choice.
Xyalon 3 weeks ago
idk whats wrong with ppl that supports same sex marriage i know one thing that in the world r more ppl like me that dont like that shit and less of those who thinks its ok u dont need to much to see that is wrong something in there just tell me if any of those same sex partners can have baby in natural ways NO so whyyy u want to get like you are a guy and love another guy ridiculousness
MrAmemaX 3 weeks ago
@MrAmemaX "idk whats wrong with ppl that supports same sex marriage" There isn't.
"i know one thing that in the world r more ppl like me that dont like that shit and less of those who thinks its ok" You don't know that and even if you did it is an argument from popularity fallacy.
People also used to think the earth was flat, didn't mean they were right.
thomaseshuis 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrAmemaX "just tell me if any of those same sex partners can have baby in natural ways " They can, nature does not require parents to be in a relationship.
Also, tell me, are you against infertile people and people who do not wish to have children as well?
"NO so whyyy u want to get like you are a guy and love another guy` Because love and sex are about more than just procreation.
Only idiots like you make such fallacious and asinine comments.
thomaseshuis 3 weeks ago
@MrAmemaX
some women have ovarian cancer. does that mean she should never get married because she cant have a kid?
second question, how is it your business whatsoever whether gay people can get married to eachother?
InvincibleNumanist 3 days ago
I dunno...
JazReviews 3 weeks ago
Very err....interesting points in your argument sir...
superwowman100 3 weeks ago
"But then it turns out that the potato is a closet...homosexual"
Dredsina 4 weeks ago
that was really funny but i still support same sex marrige. i think that people should have the right to marry the person that they love even if they are of the same sex.
tristainwinter 4 weeks ago 2
@tristainwinter so with that logic applied, those wanting to commit Incest have the right to marry the person they love?
JazReviews 3 weeks ago
@JazReviews there is nothing wrong with marrying the person you love. marriage isn't just between a man and a woman anymore!
rsftwhehe2 3 weeks ago
@rsftwhehe2 Marriage is a religious ceremony, actual marriage between 2 men is ridiculous, that's why "civil partnerships" exist.
JazReviews 3 weeks ago
@JazReviews "Marriage is a religious ceremony"
1. It isn't. Marriage is older than religion. It used to be about exchange of property.
2. Even if it was, there are many religions with different definitions of what constitutes a marriage. Which is the correct one?
3. The Western world has this concept of separation of church and state, meaning religious rules can't be enforced on those that don't adhere to it.
thomaseshuis 3 weeks ago
@JazReviews "that's why "civil partnerships" exist." In many states and countries, civil partnerships do not grant the same rights as marriage does.
And it's discrimination to deny marriage to certain groups.
thomaseshuis 3 weeks ago
@thomaseshuis Well I don't believe homosexuality is morally right, homosexuals are not entitled the right to marry in a church and house of God. It all depends how you define marriage, but in a religious sense it should is rightfully forbidden across the world.
JazReviews 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JazReviews "Well I don't believe homosexuality is morally right," Which you have every right to do, but then again morality is subjective.
"homosexuals are not entitled the right to marry in a church and house of God."
1. No one is saying that, there is no law that I know of that says that.
2. Don't you think that's up to the specific congregation or church to decide? Your interpretation of Christianity isn't the only one out there.
thomaseshuis 3 weeks ago
@JazReviews "It all depends how you define marriage, but in a religious sense it should is rightfully forbidden across the world."
Apparently you have not thoroughly read my comment. Your religion is not the only religion in existence, your specific branch of Christianity is not the only one.
Many religious denominations disagree with you. It isn't simple as you think it is.
thomaseshuis 3 weeks ago
@JazReviews On top of that you are forgetting separation of church and state.
thomaseshuis 3 weeks ago
@thomaseshuis Of course not, I'm not religious myself yet the basis from which argue is a Core-Christian, times change and evidently so does religion, but I speak from the traditional sense of the word, marriage.
JazReviews 3 weeks ago
@JazReviews Traditionally, marriage had nothing to do with religion. Binding legal unions or partnerships have been around for much longer. It is rare to find old same-sex marriages is that, for much of our history, the human race has been unable to overcome its prejudice against what it doesn't fully comprehend. As religion, especially monotheistic ones, became more prevalent across the globe, gaining more influence in politics, so legal ceremonies were absorbed into it.
Xyalon 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JazReviews "Of course not, I'm not religious myself" Then why bring up the flawed and defunct argument from religion?
"yet the basis from which argue is a Core-Christian" Why? You claim you're not religious.
"but I speak from the traditional sense of the word, marriage" That which we call marriage today existed long before christianity. Just like christmas, despite it's name is not a christian holiday, marriage is not a christian invention nor institution.
thomaseshuis 3 weeks ago
@JazReviews Morally right? Morals are arbitrary, entirely a concept of the human race; just as religion is. As such, there is no solid law governing what is morally right and wrong, and therefore you cannot found any statement on such an unstable structure. Just say you don't agree with it personally, people at least appreciate honesty. And, for your information, Same-sex marriages are performed and recognised in a number of predominantly Christian countries and Christian Sects.
Xyalon 3 weeks ago
@Xyalon Oh I know, yet some would argue that law still needs to reflect a sense of morality, and unforunatly morality can be closely tied to Religion. Therefore to allow gay marriage in the religious sense of the word is to forget the importance of Adam & Eve and to ignore the bible in it's entirety, which is to ignore the fundemental religious beliefs that have been formed over the last few thousand years.
JazReviews 3 weeks ago
@JazReviews Yes, it can be argued that the law should reflect a sense of morality, however morals are personal as well as cultural, and therefore can vary and have no absolute rigidity. Laws also vary, and can be ignored in certain cases just as morals are. It is considered morally and legally incorrect to kill someone, but if that someone is trying to kill you then it can be deemed acceptable. In all honesty, I doubt that forgetting the bible in its entirety would be a bad thing.
Xyalon 3 weeks ago
@Xyalon I know not, I assumed marriage in the strictest sense of the world was the joining of a man and his wife, traditionally.
Why must we push for gay marriage when civil partnerships exist to grant all of those legal rights (depending on where you come from). "Marriages" between homosexuals should be completely detached from religion, the religious ceremony of a Protestant/Catholic marriage should not apply to same sex couples.
JazReviews 3 weeks ago
@JazReviews "I assumed marriage in the strictest sense of the world was the joining of a man and his wife, traditionally." Which as we have shown you is false.
"Why must we push for gay marriage when civil partnerships exist to grant all of those legal rights (depending on where you come from)" You already admit that they don't grant the same rights.
Furthermore, religion does not hold the patent to word 'marriage', secular people use it as well.
thomaseshuis 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JazReviews "the religious ceremony of a Protestant/Catholic marriage should not apply to same sex couples." They already do within certain catholic and protestant denominations.
Again, should that not be up to the individual churches?
thomaseshuis 3 weeks ago
@JazReviews i see how you say that it is "morally wrong" but i dont carry your religion, and neither does a lot of people in the world.. marriage should be between two people that love each other, they have changed marriage before, why not again?
rsftwhehe2 3 weeks ago
@JazReviews Arguments against any other form of marriage are irrelevant.
Unless you can make a valid argument against same-sex marriage, there's no reason to ban it.
What you are doing is the same as racist people arguing against interracial marriage. Using logical fallacies like slippery slope arguments and other scaremongering tactics.
thomaseshuis 3 weeks ago
@JazReviews all that i'm saying is that when people are in love, regardless of sexual orientation, they should have the right to get married. the statement stands for it's self.
tristainwinter 3 weeks ago
omg this made me lol so hard! Thank you you awesome bundle of amazingness you!
Gamergal116 4 weeks ago
I supported gay rights but I dunno... He makes some pretty valid points.
xXTheNobleKnightXx 4 weeks ago
WTF???
1492irina 4 weeks ago
IT'S BOKU NO PICO ALL OVER AGAIN.
RobotxObsessedxMoron 4 weeks ago
For those of you lost, this video makes absolutely no logical sense. Showing how all the anti gay marriage arguments make no logical sense b/c this is supposed to be "The Most Logical Argument Against Same-Sex Marriage". The video is a joke, they are NOT against same sex marriage. they are supporting it by poking fun at all the anti same sex marriage arguments
angelcool1236 1 month ago 2
I have the weirdest boner right now
OMGitsFMA6666 1 month ago
You lost me at apple.
Karkenou 1 month ago
so i'm guessing this is a parody making fun of the whole argument. If not then i don't like the video if so i'm laughing my ass off.
SlamTheLabel 1 month ago
i dont even.. LOLOLOL
mki1230 1 month ago
I get it, thank you for explaining it.
oritreesan 1 month ago
That apple looks pretty tasty
R0berttx 1 month ago
So what your saying is....we need to ban eating apples, oranges, and potatoes at the same time?
thenight106 1 month ago 12
omg brb dying
monjustmon 1 month ago
You know what... THIS EXPLAINS EVERYTHING! :O
TheNobodyClub 1 month ago
This is like a 12 on the WTF-ometer. (out of 10)
AproposOfMe 1 month ago
God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve
PwnzerProductions 1 month ago
so you're all homophobes, then?
FrackaStodgo 1 month ago
Anyone else notice in the url it says "FAAAAAAAACAA"?
CrapperPacker 1 month ago
@CrapperPacker For me, it says FAAAAAAAVAA
Baxtab13 1 month ago
@Baxtab13 for me it says rdH1ZEbnIms
TheInverlock 1 month ago
uhh
InvincibleHiro 1 month ago
Don't do kids, Drugs!
chawnchuu 1 month ago
the captions were so confused....
anextremeemo 1 month ago
HOLY SHIT I TOTALLY GET IT NOW!
MinoruIV 1 month ago
Powerful. Stupid fruits and stupid gay potatos. If a straight banana was involved it be better. Cuz it's long and phallic and totally not gay at all because it's straight but really curvy. Ugh...go straights!
LancerJak 1 month ago 23
I don't know what just happened, but I think it won at life.
MrMacSpiffy 1 month ago
I THINK YOU BRAIN MY DAMAGE! @_@
crackhead619 1 month ago
NOW everything makes sense! .... i think...
iiAznChan 1 month ago
:O <<<< i was like this the whole time
DomoKunDuhhh 1 month ago
You killed the orange... :(
thanh320 1 month ago
My parents walked in as I started to spank the monkey to this.
CyberTaco98 1 month ago
Hmmm you sir have provided a legitimate argument and therefore i appreciate your input and withdrawl my previous disagreement
TheCaboose568 1 month ago
Comment removed
PerfectlyPerfect123 1 month ago
I don't get it, am I an apple or an orange?
Brunick34 1 month ago
@Brunick34 You're one of them, you're one of them..
BalloonGaming 1 month ago
funny, lol and puking. but still I dont agree about with this guy
jonyashworld 1 month ago
uh, what
MoonblazeXCyruss 1 month ago
Does this mean I'm a potato
MadxAsxIxKnowxIt 1 month ago
wow, you have given us the best argument to ban gay marriage and gay sex to- its all just tooooo grossss, you cut straight to the chase
wotan237 1 month ago
Genius.
moontanned1 1 month ago
omg!!! lmfao what is air and what did i just watch?!???? XD
jadedragon0013 1 month ago
Well, there goes my hope for a day without WTF
LordHonkInc 1 month ago
Makes more sense than the religious reasons !!!
jmu11a 1 month ago
His father must b so...proud lol
themagnificentmarvel 1 month ago
"No gay potato orange sex." lol wat ;D.
Jimmy0971 1 month ago
AAHAHAHAJSAGDJDAHF
rokurin122 1 month ago
And this is how Clementines are made.
derFischmoerder 1 month ago 44
I can't...
This video made me forget how to breathe...WITH ITS BEAUTY
theawesomelizzy 1 month ago
i suddenly
.... UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING
Choralseptic 1 month ago
"NO!!! No gay potatoes!!! NO!!!!"
TurianSpectre22 1 month ago
Now do it backwards.
crabsnacks 1 month ago
omg my creyes
NCISnerdette 1 month ago
i strongly disagree, but this is funny as hell!
crissangelbelieve6 1 month ago
Although I disagree, LOL DUDE. xD
WhAtEvErMoRoNz 1 month ago
What about banana? Banana can't have a say in this matter?
LittleGlassDolly 1 month ago
I'm white, 5'5 and my eyes are brown. I can't change the fact that I'm white. I can't change my height. But I can hide my eye color, how?contacts. People judge my brown eyes, they all love blue eyes. So, I got blue contacts. No one can tell I have brown eyes, so they don't take time out of their day to pick on me or tell me I'm full of shit for having brown eyes EVEN THOUGH I CAN'T HELP WHAT COLOR THEY ARE.
LOLCayenne 1 month ago
@LOLCayenne IRRELEVANT TO THE GODDAMN VIDEO
RobotxObsessedxMoron 1 month ago
Ahhh I see. This makes perfect sense!
StarfireClaudia 1 month ago
can you explain that one more time?
fwimble 1 month ago
As logical as all the other arguments =)
JaggLion 1 month ago 2
i found this difficult to masturbate to... but i pushed through
jimbabwethegreat 1 month ago 89
Okay I think I missed something.
TerranIsImba 1 month ago
Ur no different than a racist!!!! Ur gross
malloryb214 2 months ago
@malloryb214 Your sarcasm detector was turned off.
Or perhaps mine was...
orniver 2 months ago
but but but.. gay potatoes are delicious, and always better in pairs especially when covered in cream!
gilgameshismist 2 months ago
whoa
ruizhi567 2 months ago
lol
Lok783 2 months ago
that's actually amazing :p
sacraficialangel7 2 months ago
Now it all makes sense! I understand now! Why didn't I think of this?
thereforeithought 2 months ago 3
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA DAMN THIS IS NOT FUNNY, THIS IS HILARIOUS!!!
TTFLS 2 months ago
Lol funny stuff ^^
TTFLS 2 months ago
ORANGEGASM!
BranwynMaddox 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
makes as much sense as other reasons i've heard.
gabrielcrimson 2 months ago
seems legit
The1whodreams 2 months ago
where's the annoying orange when you need 'em...
hirokiO9 3 months ago
Comment removed
bbillyk 3 months ago
I dunno why everyone's laughing, this actually IS the most logical argument against same-sex marriage.
mobius212 3 months ago 2
funniest shit i ever saw
RidgeGuitarWoW 3 months ago
Why should we ban same sex marriage? Because a apple and an orange and a potatoe had sex?
NathanOles 3 months ago
this was actualy funny, mostly because of the orange exploding and the guy has a fro.
MagnusCattus 3 months ago
Truly the most logical argument on gay marriage i've heard.
soulsistah102 3 months ago
Orange juice is unhealthy, therefore gay marriage is bad.
Cool beans. :P
SuekoTheStrange 3 months ago
I am confused now.
snozzletheadorable 3 months ago
LOL!!!!! I like it!!!!
RaMM0nE 3 months ago
Comment removed
SodaWaterification 3 months ago
@SodaWaterification
Why are straight men ok with having shit on the ends of their dicks when they have anal sex with their female partners? Oh, just so you know, there's one thing called enema.
wilde77 3 months ago
Comment removed
SodaWaterification 3 months ago
And I'll never look at these things the same way again...
chasingponies 3 months ago
I think the government should stay out of marriage.
pf91rodman 3 months ago
@pf91rodman So let anyone marry anybody/anything?? It'll be marriage anarchy!
organist12345 3 months ago
@organist12345
the government has no authority to control marriage. It's not in the constitution.
pf91rodman 3 months ago
@pf91rodman What kind of hippy are you?
organist12345 3 months ago
@organist12345
I'm a registered republican constitutional conservative
pf91rodman 3 months ago
@pf91rodman Marriage still needs to be conserved. You can't just let anyone marry anybody/anything as it defeats the whole principle of marriage. If the government doesn't do anything regarding marriage, the whole concept will be destroyed.
organist12345 3 months ago
@organist12345
Hey I'm with you, I don't think the definition of marriage should be changed. But I''m not a fan of using the government to impose our views onto other people. The same goes for homosexuals who want to use the government force churches against their will to perform gay marriage ceremonies.
pf91rodman 3 months ago
@organist12345 'You can't just let anyone marry anybody/anything as it defeats the whole principle of marriage.' There is however no good reason to ban same-sex marriage.
'The same goes for homosexuals who want to use the government force churches against their will to perform gay marriage ceremonies. ' That would be a minority. Furthermore all the laws in both the U.S. and European countries have only been about state marriage, not religious marriage.
thomaseshuis 3 months ago
@thomaseshuis To not corrupt one of the most important and sacred institutions of our time?
organist12345 3 months ago
@organist12345 Sacred in what way? The majority of divorces are in religious families.
We are talking about state marriage, not religious marriage. Sacred is a religious term and therefore irrelevant.
Finally how does same-sex marriage 'corrupt' state marriage?
thomaseshuis 3 months ago
@organist12345
Also, the US Supreme Court has ruled no less than 14 times throughout the last 100 years, that marriage is a fundamental civil right. Even a 75 year old convicted child molester, currently incarcerated for life cannot be legally denied a license to marry (unless of course he's jailed in one of the 45 states that don't allow marriage equality, and his fiance is a man)
hominyboy 3 months ago
@organist12345 Can you provide a single example of your point, how marriage equality will destroy the concept of marriage? I've never heard one, and I'd really like to.
hominyboy 3 months ago
@hominyboy Are you really that callous? The only reason marriage came to existance in the first place was for a union between one man, and one woman, and to accomodate and encourage procreation. If we follow the view of "marriage equality", then we should allow anyone to get married with anything. ie, multiple partners, people of the same sex, animals, etc. This entirely defeats the whole point of marriage. It only takes a small amount of common sense to see this.
organist12345 3 months ago
@organist12345 If I remember correctly marriage was generally an economic institution, then Christianity came and molded it to what they wanted, which is cool, but it's fallacious to say that "it's our true and original concept"
OriginalYTPooper 3 months ago 2
@organist12345 'The only reason marriage came to existance in the first place was for a union between one man, and one woman,' Please provide peer-reviewed evidence that the first marriage was for this reason and not for financial gain or love. 'and to accomodate and encourage procreation.' Again, provide peer-reviewed and scientific evidence for this ridiculous statement.
thomaseshuis 3 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@organist12345 'then we should allow anyone to get married with anything'
'multiple partners' Indeed, there is no logical nor other reasonable argument to prohibit this for consenting people.
'people of the same sex' Also no reason to prohibit this.
'animals' Animals can't consent, therefore they cannot marry. This logically flawed argument has been debunked so many times, you should really stop using it.
thomaseshuis 3 months ago
@organist12345 'his entirely defeats the whole point of marriage.' You have failed to provide evidence for an eternal and unchanging 'point' or definition of marriage.
'It only takes a small amount of common sense to see this. ' No, it takes a small ammount of commons sense that your arguments are based on appeals to emotion and a false and unsupported view of reality.
thomaseshuis 3 months ago
@organist12345
What about you?
pf91rodman 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@organist12345
" It'll be marriage anarchy!"
yup, because its none of your fucking business.
InvincibleNumanist 3 days ago
Rule 34
buukro 3 months ago
is he talking about orgy???
jasonar888 3 months ago
XD fucking hilarious!
xXxforkboyxXx 4 months ago
"And then they have gay potato orange sex!"
purplesodapop 4 months ago
"And that's why you should ban same sex marriage."
because Pacman humped a potatoe and made orange juice.
Dominodude55 4 months ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 4 months ago
This made me hard.
TheAmazingJoLuCo 4 months ago in playlist Playlist - Funny Videos
Lol this is not what i was expect but you put a smile on my face :)
redicryan2011 4 months ago
I have the weirdest boner right now
DokterDriesy 4 months ago 12
This is the Truth
4Licano 4 months ago
This is so much funnier now that people are actually using this argument.
MrLawrenceV 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Without forgiveness, there is no salvation. Without salvation, there is only damnation in eternal hell.
PLEASE FOR YOUR LIFE ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST AS YOUR SAVIOR AND REPENT FROM YOUR SINS
Godlovesyou71 4 months ago
@Godlovesyou71 Fuck Jesus Christ
vcomp1960 4 months ago
@Godlovesyou71 Jesus Christ sucked my cock last night
jscott181 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
•1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
Godlovesyou71 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
•1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
Godlovesyou71 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
•Lev. 18:22, "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."1
•Lev. 20:13, "If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltness is upon them"
Godlovesyou71 4 months ago
Yet, this appears to be the most logical of explanations I´ve heard so far to ban same sex marriage.
FreeMason34 4 months ago
WHAT THE FISH????? just happened
de0509 4 months ago
This argument is immediately discredited because he compared apples to oranges
MrWoca 4 months ago 83