The only thing that bothers me about this version is how it seems the actor playing Phantom acts the same way, makes the same facial expressions as he did playing Freddy. But that's just my opinion.
as confusing as the plot is, its still awesome.. how ever i think the whole NY think is where Phantom of Manhattan came from, and hence Love Never Dies....eeecch
The one thing I did like about this movie was the music. It actually was very good. And Robert Englund was a good, creepy Phantom. But the whole time travel/reincarnation thing just ruined it all for me; it was so moronic. And there's so much death it's just kind of mind-numbing after awhile. By the end I really did not care if anyone died or not.
I do have a theory as to why Christine has memories from her future self. When she got hit with the sandbag, her past life was unlocked, but she still retains the memory of her modern day life, and therefore has access to all her memories. Idk. Let me know if that doesn't make sense.
I agree with you on the modern day stuff. It's just annoying. Why can't they just keep the story the way it is? I really like Robert Englund in this. He's both creepy and charming. There's an art and an elegance to his creepiness. I also really like the way the lair looks. I pictured it almost exactly like this when reading the novel.
The Robert Englund version actually has the Phantom in this movie deformed. Just like the book and the Chaney version. I'm not trying to mess up your review, sir. I'm only stating a fact about the movie.
@SelenaGomezFan10001 No it doesnt. A deformity is when you are BORN that way. Erik Destler has his face burned by the devil. So that would be a DISFIGUREMENT. And nothing like the book or Chaney version.
Apart from the modern day scenes and the last 15 mins of the film, I really like this version! Your review is brilliant since you cover all the 'phantomy goodness' the film provides.
Yeah, that storyline does sound awesome, I'd pay to see it, although I'd rather have Ramin singing Beauty Underneath. You can't exactly stage skinning and decapitation.
I just re-watched this yesterday, and it seemed to me like the whole timetravel/past life thing could've possibly had something to do with the contract Erik signed...In the fine print, perhaps? Or not...Just an idea...
Also for the reson of that flash back is since she made a vowed to him she will be cross back and fourth each time she breaks glass. So it not really confusioning well at first it is and i'm not sure if i'm completly right
Another problem with this film is that Erik doesn't truly seem to be in love with Christine and there is no repentence on his part at the end (like in the original novel). Even after he has come to the modern day, he seems as cruel and deranged as when he lost Christine in the 1880s. Plus, this movie completely negates that critical part of Erik's character that for all of his truly horrible crimes - I highly doub t that Erik would want to kill people whenever the mood takes him.
Because in the novel, he wanted to be good and wanted and had alot of love inside of him to give - but this Erik keeps growing worse and worse and in the end, for me, your glad he was finally brought to justice.
I would'nt really say this Erik necessarily kills people whenever the mood takes him. Although there is a high body count, IMO he does it for a reason (not that murder's ever justifiable, but at least it's not like in the fricking Dario Argento/Julian Sands version, now *that* Erik just randomly murders people for the hell of it, At least he has motives in this version).
I have an idea as to why past Christine gets memories (and can sing Erik's lyrics) from her future self: She doesn't. Maybe the memories were from even further into the past. Like the cycle just keeps repeating over and over and over. And she got this in the 1700s or whenever. I don't know. It's just a theory.
Robert Englund has to be the best phantom EVAR! Now if only they would have just given him a mask....masks are cool.....well the whole skinning people thing is cool too..
I liked this review and I LOVED the clips from "The Man Who Laughs". Are you planning on reviewing that film? I love that film and would love to see what kind of review you'd do for it, if you're planning to do one.
YEAH!!!! I LOVE DOCTOR WHO!!!!!!!! but i prefer tom baker from the old and christipher eccelston from new to mr. tennent. Oh well back to reveiw maybe she got reborn and can't die like captain jack harkness( love is butt!!!! voice and very thing!!! sadly he is gay :'( :'( ... here's praying that he's bie :)!!!!!!! ) and really was there and she has a memory problem.... just a geuss. but cool reviews!!!! I love it. R L Stine did a version too!!!!! it was called PHANTOM OF THE AUDITORIUM!!! watch!
I can explain it to you, with a little help from my other obsession, Doctor Who..."Wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey." Seriously, it's the only thing that can make this movie make any sense!! I completely agree with you, PhantomReviews. And I'm thoroughly enjoying watching your reviews.
One interesting thing I noticed about this version of the movie is that Erik doesn't seem so much in love with Christine as obsessed with her voice. Am I the only one who gets that feeling he only really cares about her voice? Especially in light of what you said, PhantomReviews, about the sequel that the producers wanted to make - where he falls in love with a blind girl.
Just click on my name "PhantomReviews" (or youtube search for it) or click on "More from PhantomReviews" to see a full list of every video I have made. Ive reviewed virtually every POTO movie from 1925 to 1990. Charles Dance is next.
ok look i have to say i realy love your revews they are so cool and quite onest but when and or where for god sake are you going to do the diaro argento vertion? its like the only one you havn't done and yet you make somany referances to it.
Patience, patience, there are one or two more terrible movies to review before I get to that one! It will be soon though, I'm into the 1990s now so not too many to go...
he knows we all want to see him do it that is why he has waited to do it. i mean also it may be in 2 maybe 3 parts just to cover all the wtfness of it
This is my absolute favorite version (with an awesome soundtrack), and it's a damn shame there was no sequel. It was the studio that doomed this movie from the start by marketing it as some kind of pseudo-Freddy movie (look at the poster), much to Englund's chagrin. He gave a very emotional performance as the Phantom that still goes overlooked by casual viewers.
Well, there are some science theories out there that time and alternate lives aren't actually forward and behind each other, but in sync, which would explain it.
For instance all these predictions and such from people a thousand years ago. And more recently the weird fold-a-dollar-and-get-buildings-on-fire thing.
My guess is that this was what the writers were playing at; Prediction.
lol the Panam bulding, it's owned by some insurance company now, I pass by it all the time
and I don't care enogh to remember the name,lol
they should have made the whole thing in the 80's. Her battling the phantom in nyc's sewers. They could make the phantom a drug dealer, I mean 20 years ago this city had 2 things, stock brokers and drug dealers
The beginning and end of the movie being set in the modern day plays out like a bad fanfiction story. I have to agree with you that this is a major flaw in a pretty good film.
I love the Robert England phantom. You did an awsom and funny job at this. I can not wait to see the rest of your reviews when you are done this Phantom you should the Musical one you speek of at the end with Garerd Butler. I wouldl love to see what you say to it. And you words ryme well
I don't really think it is to much of a parody cause his has such a true piont it is almost scary.ALW needs to stop raping the phantom.About the phantom of manhatten well had to buy it for some weird reason first chapter is screw everything you know screw all the books screw the musicaly i am the sequel of this is what happens. and that is in the first chapter.key piont at the end of the play Meg finds the mask... wait no she doesn't... how could she he has it with him while he hids in a closet.
I just did a search, and it seems you heard right. He developed the plot with Frederick Forsyth, then he "dropped the project in 1999", because he was "unhappy with some of the plotting of the novel" - Makes sense, because Erik wasn't in much of the book.
I hope this is a misprint, regarding Webber: "his collaboration with Forsyth seems ongoing."
Bringing the Erik to NY is going to kill it (for a musical). - The book was bad enough!
I thought i was right lol. Well i just finished chapter 2 and i must say wtf. the only good thing about it is like well eric is hot and he was in Coney Island witch is my home town that is the good parts the rest is omg wtf and how are they going to make a musical out of this. I mean why is he worshiping money what is he going to see if he where a rich man O_O i am dead serious. yeah i don't think i can stand any more of this retarded ass book O_O
When I'm done with the movies, I might just read this monstrosity and review it in time for the release of the stage version. When is that out, anyway?
I have no clue. But in chapter 1 is first he was born then his dad sold him at 6 or some age of that then when he was like 17 the lady saved him and now he was like 30 when the stuff in the play happened and in chapter 2 he is rich and he worships money kinda i don't know i said screw the whole thing. But after you mentions the movie with a non disfigured eric i looked up a review can't wait for you to do it cause seeing the review of it alone made me feel raped and wanted to stab my eyes out
ascrazy as the plot seems it makes me wonder if the phantom and christine are connected...or if modern day christine incarnates into past christine, giving her the memories
Thank you for the advisory at the beginning of the video. My little sister almost watched it with me and so it was just as well you put that up. This is an excellent review and I couldn't agree more on your thoughts regarding this version.
Although the fact that there´s no chandelier crash and the phantom uses flesh of his victims instead of a real mask really bothered me, i quite like this version. it´s certainly not the best phantom, but quite entertaining
So...Christine is stuck in the big ball of wibbly wobbly timey wimey...stuff?
KittyxGrimm 1 month ago
@KittyxGrimm Seems like it, Doctor.
VincentoValentine 1 month ago in playlist Phantom Reviews Season 1
The only thing that bothers me about this version is how it seems the actor playing Phantom acts the same way, makes the same facial expressions as he did playing Freddy. But that's just my opinion.
Poet2916 1 month ago in playlist Phantom Reviews Season 1
am I the only one that thinks that this Phantom extremely attractive, physically and personality wise?
Poet2916 1 month ago in playlist Phantom Reviews Season 1
@Poet2916 he's dead ugly. And I don't mean the deformity
HorseyWitchOfTheEast 3 weeks ago
@LesMis931 so most of the movie is just Christine's hallucination, but she's half-conscious? Huh?
evfan13 3 months ago
I love your 'Music of the Night for the sequel' at the end. lol
phangirl1986 3 months ago
I love the music of the night music to the sequel! ;)
phantomphan4ever1 4 months ago
6:13- 6:38 never going to happen
ohfilms1 4 months ago
as confusing as the plot is, its still awesome.. how ever i think the whole NY think is where Phantom of Manhattan came from, and hence Love Never Dies....eeecch
Scar2401 4 months ago
The one thing I did like about this movie was the music. It actually was very good. And Robert Englund was a good, creepy Phantom. But the whole time travel/reincarnation thing just ruined it all for me; it was so moronic. And there's so much death it's just kind of mind-numbing after awhile. By the end I really did not care if anyone died or not.
phangirl1986 5 months ago in playlist Every Phantom Review in order of movie age
I actually kinda like Englund's Erik.: )
origamipein18 6 months ago
uh i didn't like this one so much
castlevania3151 7 months ago
I do have a theory as to why Christine has memories from her future self. When she got hit with the sandbag, her past life was unlocked, but she still retains the memory of her modern day life, and therefore has access to all her memories. Idk. Let me know if that doesn't make sense.
LesMis931 1 year ago
I agree with you on the modern day stuff. It's just annoying. Why can't they just keep the story the way it is? I really like Robert Englund in this. He's both creepy and charming. There's an art and an elegance to his creepiness. I also really like the way the lair looks. I pictured it almost exactly like this when reading the novel.
jazzandmint 1 year ago
With Rober Englund as the phantom, imagine Kane Hodder as the hunchback.
godzilla964 1 year ago
Imagine if Anthony Hopkins was the phantom.
godzilla964 1 year ago 2
@godzilla964 tht movie could not be aired due to to much awesomness
batmanalienpred 1 year ago
@godzilla964 im actually really suprised they havent done that yet! hopkins would make an excelent phantom!!!
ShadowDwellerXXX 7 months ago in playlist interesting interviews and other stuff
Robert's a fucking badass in this movie!
dlausactor6373 1 year ago
The Robert Englund version actually has the Phantom in this movie deformed. Just like the book and the Chaney version. I'm not trying to mess up your review, sir. I'm only stating a fact about the movie.
SelenaGomezFan10001 1 year ago
@SelenaGomezFan10001 No it doesnt. A deformity is when you are BORN that way. Erik Destler has his face burned by the devil. So that would be a DISFIGUREMENT. And nothing like the book or Chaney version.
PhantomReviews 1 year ago 11
@PhantomReviews I know. Never mind that comment, sir.
SelenaGomezFan10001 1 year ago
@PhantomReviews im with u dude
phantomluvkid 1 year ago
Guess what... THERE IS A MUSICAL BASED OFF PHANTOM OF MANHATTAN! That you've reviewed... already... heh.
ShadowinEX 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Apart from the modern day scenes and the last 15 mins of the film, I really like this version! Your review is brilliant since you cover all the 'phantomy goodness' the film provides.
aswansongofmine 1 year ago
Yeah, that storyline does sound awesome, I'd pay to see it, although I'd rather have Ramin singing Beauty Underneath. You can't exactly stage skinning and decapitation.
SkylaWestman 1 year ago
I really wish they made the sequel =/
DragonHeart06 1 year ago
I just re-watched this yesterday, and it seemed to me like the whole timetravel/past life thing could've possibly had something to do with the contract Erik signed...In the fine print, perhaps? Or not...Just an idea...
McXahn 1 year ago
I really do like this version of Phantom of the Opera but my favorite part thoughout this THE KILLED RAULF!!!!but his name is Richard.
101mkable 1 year ago
Also for the reson of that flash back is since she made a vowed to him she will be cross back and fourth each time she breaks glass. So it not really confusioning well at first it is and i'm not sure if i'm completly right
101mkable 1 year ago 2
Well techincally, she didn't make a vow.
EmilyGreene1984 1 year ago
X'D that song at the end is priceless...
PinkCharmander 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
What in the name of Erik's vest? XD
lilrowyravenclaw 2 years ago
Comment removed
lilrowyravenclaw 2 years ago
i love that song at the end
HaHaHa !!!!!
XD
psychmjr2001 2 years ago
As much as I absolutely love this version, I still cracked up at the "world's shortest skirt" comment.
sonic8005 2 years ago 3
no way... molly shannon!!! ahahaha.
MeGustanUvas 2 years ago
Okay, that was completely hallarious. Five stars!
competentpixie 2 years ago 2
This version of PHANTOM is awesome, bloody & creepy!!! Robert's Phantom is hilarious.
ravensboy 2 years ago 19
The music in this version is AMAZING... Jill Shoelen did a fantastic job of realistically lip-synching to Nancy Fontana's vocal track.
BroadwayGuy25 2 years ago 3
Another problem with this film is that Erik doesn't truly seem to be in love with Christine and there is no repentence on his part at the end (like in the original novel). Even after he has come to the modern day, he seems as cruel and deranged as when he lost Christine in the 1880s. Plus, this movie completely negates that critical part of Erik's character that for all of his truly horrible crimes - I highly doub t that Erik would want to kill people whenever the mood takes him.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago 6
Because in the novel, he wanted to be good and wanted and had alot of love inside of him to give - but this Erik keeps growing worse and worse and in the end, for me, your glad he was finally brought to justice.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago 3
I would'nt really say this Erik necessarily kills people whenever the mood takes him. Although there is a high body count, IMO he does it for a reason (not that murder's ever justifiable, but at least it's not like in the fricking Dario Argento/Julian Sands version, now *that* Erik just randomly murders people for the hell of it, At least he has motives in this version).
MsPinkWings 2 years ago 4
I agree with the narrator soo much!
gce1986 2 years ago 3
lol love the singing!
iceypickett 2 years ago 4
Your singing part is AWESOME!!!!
Ropieroo 2 years ago
P.S. Christine looks like Winnie from the Wonder Years.
stitchgrl777 2 years ago
The soundtrack actually has a violin piece of the song Christine sings in the beginning and end. It's beautiful!
I had to fold the soundtrack cover inside out because I couldn't stare at Englund's bloody face.
But you're right. This Erik ROCKS. Love the scene where he's walking with the violin.
stitchgrl777 2 years ago
I have an idea as to why past Christine gets memories (and can sing Erik's lyrics) from her future self: She doesn't. Maybe the memories were from even further into the past. Like the cycle just keeps repeating over and over and over. And she got this in the 1700s or whenever. I don't know. It's just a theory.
pennsylvaniagerl 2 years ago 7
Thats the most sensible suggestion I have heard for this crazy plot. Thanks!
PhantomReviews 2 years ago 5
This was actually what I thought all along! I was never so confused about that part.
PuppetMuffin 2 years ago 2
But that negates the style of clothes in the audience in her past memories, so it would be doubtful that she was cursed prior to the events.
EmilyGreene1984 2 years ago
@pennsylvaniagerl that's EXACTLY what I think!
GoneLookingForMyself 1 year ago
Meg is Molly Shannon! hahahaha!
jjbate 2 years ago
they need to release the unrated version
cambellfan22 2 years ago
Your reviews are quite entertaining. The Albert Einstein shot was funny I loved it all.
McGavinprincess 2 years ago
london opera house??? WTH??
crawfordfanatic 2 years ago
OMG Phantom of Manhatten makes you want to drill your eys out! Fredrick Forsyth sucks Big Time! I like you comment on that
crawfordfanatic 2 years ago 4
Robert Englund has to be the best phantom EVAR! Now if only they would have just given him a mask....masks are cool.....well the whole skinning people thing is cool too..
ItachiUchiha2010 2 years ago
Ugh I Wanna See This Film So Bad!
If Anyone has any links to it could they plaese send me them to me :]
thank you.
aimztheripper 2 years ago 2
Hey dude.I found this movie via torrent a while ago,I'll look for the link and if I find it,I'd be more than happy to send it to you :)
Ps.-Reviewer,was that you singing?Your voice is beautiful!
69eYe 2 years ago
Tis me singing, thankyou!
PhantomReviews 2 years ago
You're welcome,you sound much like The Phantom...how weird :D
69eYe 2 years ago
I liked this review and I LOVED the clips from "The Man Who Laughs". Are you planning on reviewing that film? I love that film and would love to see what kind of review you'd do for it, if you're planning to do one.
TheaterRaven 2 years ago
YEAH!!!! I LOVE DOCTOR WHO!!!!!!!! but i prefer tom baker from the old and christipher eccelston from new to mr. tennent. Oh well back to reveiw maybe she got reborn and can't die like captain jack harkness( love is butt!!!! voice and very thing!!! sadly he is gay :'( :'( ... here's praying that he's bie :)!!!!!!! ) and really was there and she has a memory problem.... just a geuss. but cool reviews!!!! I love it. R L Stine did a version too!!!!! it was called PHANTOM OF THE AUDITORIUM!!! watch!
phantomess1870 2 years ago
I can explain it to you, with a little help from my other obsession, Doctor Who..."Wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey." Seriously, it's the only thing that can make this movie make any sense!! I completely agree with you, PhantomReviews. And I'm thoroughly enjoying watching your reviews.
Peace out!
FlowerGirl9016 3 years ago
One interesting thing I noticed about this version of the movie is that Erik doesn't seem so much in love with Christine as obsessed with her voice. Am I the only one who gets that feeling he only really cares about her voice? Especially in light of what you said, PhantomReviews, about the sequel that the producers wanted to make - where he falls in love with a blind girl.
EmilyGreene1984 3 years ago
Watch what you say about this movie...I am an Englund freak...and phantom of the opera too. XP
smexybabe246 3 years ago
and sorry if i sounded pushy in my last comment
canelongno1 3 years ago
can you give me the list of the phantom films that you have done coz iv lost track.
and whats left?
canelongno1 3 years ago
Just click on my name "PhantomReviews" (or youtube search for it) or click on "More from PhantomReviews" to see a full list of every video I have made. Ive reviewed virtually every POTO movie from 1925 to 1990. Charles Dance is next.
PhantomReviews 3 years ago
you made me need to find the movie the man who laughs thanks ^_^ i haven't seen it yet but it is on the list
RebelFounderOdogoo 3 years ago
ok look i have to say i realy love your revews they are so cool and quite onest but when and or where for god sake are you going to do the diaro argento vertion? its like the only one you havn't done and yet you make somany referances to it.
if it is already on where the hell is it?
canelongno1 3 years ago
Patience, patience, there are one or two more terrible movies to review before I get to that one! It will be soon though, I'm into the 1990s now so not too many to go...
PhantomReviews 3 years ago
he knows we all want to see him do it that is why he has waited to do it. i mean also it may be in 2 maybe 3 parts just to cover all the wtfness of it
RebelFounderOdogoo 3 years ago
This is my absolute favorite version (with an awesome soundtrack), and it's a damn shame there was no sequel. It was the studio that doomed this movie from the start by marketing it as some kind of pseudo-Freddy movie (look at the poster), much to Englund's chagrin. He gave a very emotional performance as the Phantom that still goes overlooked by casual viewers.
JoelandtheBots 3 years ago 2
exactly
RebelFounderOdogoo 3 years ago
That's brilliant.
CrazyHobbitGirl 3 years ago
Rober Englunds freaked me out.
MichaelCrawfordsFan 3 years ago 3
Well, there are some science theories out there that time and alternate lives aren't actually forward and behind each other, but in sync, which would explain it.
For instance all these predictions and such from people a thousand years ago. And more recently the weird fold-a-dollar-and-get-buildings-on-fire thing.
My guess is that this was what the writers were playing at; Prediction.
Waterlilycat 3 years ago
lol the Panam bulding, it's owned by some insurance company now, I pass by it all the time
and I don't care enogh to remember the name,lol
they should have made the whole thing in the 80's. Her battling the phantom in nyc's sewers. They could make the phantom a drug dealer, I mean 20 years ago this city had 2 things, stock brokers and drug dealers
tico8007 3 years ago
The beginning and end of the movie being set in the modern day plays out like a bad fanfiction story. I have to agree with you that this is a major flaw in a pretty good film.
TheShadowyPhantom 3 years ago 2
is this movie better than the original nightmare on Elm Street? is it as gory as dead alive?
tico8007 3 years ago
Does anyone think the lair with the candles in the Englund version resembles kinda the ALW 2004 film lair?
sk8phan 3 years ago 4
this is too good!
and this version is just soo...ugh,weird that i cant help but love it.
CancerousPiesRTasty 3 years ago
hehe the phantom has fitted his lair with a home entertainment system.
gizmobizness1 3 years ago 5
I love the Robert England phantom. You did an awsom and funny job at this. I can not wait to see the rest of your reviews when you are done this Phantom you should the Musical one you speek of at the end with Garerd Butler. I wouldl love to see what you say to it. And you words ryme well
dracerick 3 years ago
There is a review of the Gerard Butler version on my youtube channel, its one of the first videos I posted.
PhantomReviews 3 years ago
PR,
Your reviews are great! A few of them had me laughing out loud.
Keep up the good work. I look forward to seeing your next one. :)
Thanx!
vShaede 3 years ago
Good one on making a parody of Music of the Night. :p
wahinesurfergirl 3 years ago
I don't really think it is to much of a parody cause his has such a true piont it is almost scary.ALW needs to stop raping the phantom.About the phantom of manhatten well had to buy it for some weird reason first chapter is screw everything you know screw all the books screw the musicaly i am the sequel of this is what happens. and that is in the first chapter.key piont at the end of the play Meg finds the mask... wait no she doesn't... how could she he has it with him while he hids in a closet.
RebelFounderOdogoo 3 years ago 2
hear, hear to the dumbass new ALW musical based on Phantom of Manhatten
PinkGoesGoodWitGreen 3 years ago 2
You said it!
I "suffered" through that book, and unless ALW plans to do some major editing, there won't be much of Erik in the story.
The book was a huge disappointment to devout Phantom fans. - I don't see much hope for the musical.
vShaede 3 years ago
From what i hear it was the sequal to the play and ALW helped in it's creation now wtf?!
RebelFounderOdogoo 3 years ago
Hi RebelFounderOdogoo,
I just did a search, and it seems you heard right. He developed the plot with Frederick Forsyth, then he "dropped the project in 1999", because he was "unhappy with some of the plotting of the novel" - Makes sense, because Erik wasn't in much of the book.
I hope this is a misprint, regarding Webber: "his collaboration with Forsyth seems ongoing."
Bringing the Erik to NY is going to kill it (for a musical). - The book was bad enough!
RE: "wtf?!" -- DITTO!!!
vShaede 3 years ago
I thought i was right lol. Well i just finished chapter 2 and i must say wtf. the only good thing about it is like well eric is hot and he was in Coney Island witch is my home town that is the good parts the rest is omg wtf and how are they going to make a musical out of this. I mean why is he worshiping money what is he going to see if he where a rich man O_O i am dead serious. yeah i don't think i can stand any more of this retarded ass book O_O
RebelFounderOdogoo 3 years ago
When I'm done with the movies, I might just read this monstrosity and review it in time for the release of the stage version. When is that out, anyway?
PhantomReviews 3 years ago
I have no clue. But in chapter 1 is first he was born then his dad sold him at 6 or some age of that then when he was like 17 the lady saved him and now he was like 30 when the stuff in the play happened and in chapter 2 he is rich and he worships money kinda i don't know i said screw the whole thing. But after you mentions the movie with a non disfigured eric i looked up a review can't wait for you to do it cause seeing the review of it alone made me feel raped and wanted to stab my eyes out
RebelFounderOdogoo 3 years ago
ok i just was fliping though the book yeah for some weird ass reason there is money worship wtf...
RebelFounderOdogoo 3 years ago
PR should see the sequel, videotape it, then review it, that way we know how it turns out. :P
iamthewalrus014 2 years ago
Oh look at 2:48! We got ourselves a Les Miserables refrence in Phantom of the Opera! lol
Hasselhoffhater 3 years ago
Well spotted - that always jerked me out of the reality of the film as well!
PhantomReviews 3 years ago
I'm still kinda surprised that I never caught that earlier on
Hasselhoffhater 3 years ago
ascrazy as the plot seems it makes me wonder if the phantom and christine are connected...or if modern day christine incarnates into past christine, giving her the memories
RaWrZzZz 3 years ago
is this a musical as well? or no?
Erg0 3 years ago
not at all.
DrNoYes9 3 years ago
Yeah, Lon Chaney Phantom will always be my favorite.
Hausisse 3 years ago
This is the one where Molly Shannon plays Meg!
jarvisel 3 years ago
i thought that was molly shannon! i cant belive she was in this.
MeGustanUvas 3 years ago
Thank you for the advisory at the beginning of the video. My little sister almost watched it with me and so it was just as well you put that up. This is an excellent review and I couldn't agree more on your thoughts regarding this version.
EmilyGreene1984 3 years ago
LOL! I've never heard of MOTN like THAT! ROTFLMAO!!!!!!
LightsCameraAaron 3 years ago
Lol, I m loving ur reviews. You go into great detail XDDD
And this version...
Well...All I can say his...a bit too much gory parts for my liking. Apart from that, it was good.
clamp2005 3 years ago
Ah yes I've been pending this post! Can't wait for part deux!
I love your rewrite of the lyrics to MOTN too.
MrsLonChaney 3 years ago
Can't wait for part two! "You think it's alarming.. but i think it's quite charming" That bit made me laugh so hard.
TangoMaureen07 3 years ago
Although the fact that there´s no chandelier crash and the phantom uses flesh of his victims instead of a real mask really bothered me, i quite like this version. it´s certainly not the best phantom, but quite entertaining
matheusmarchetti 3 years ago
Awesome review - looking forward to part 2 and you know that whole time travel thing confused me too. Glad I'm not the only one!
VictoriaWinters1991 3 years ago
Haha I like this one!
This version is kinda one of my favorites since it creeps me out and its pretty cheesy lol
monpetiteange13 3 years ago
Hee hee, "Phantomy goodness." I remember watching this movie as a kid. Oh, the nostalgic fun!
SloeEyedDoe 3 years ago