@MaaNonu123 this isn't even a theory because even a scientific theory has observable and experimental evidence. This is nothing more than a bunch of sci-fi garbage made up by sci-fi nerds.
an parent universe in polymer chain of multi-universe exp. mitosis dividing this reality or universe from 1 superimposed with a parallel via superposition in entanglement
I believe the big bang is initiated by energy which cant be created, Y in omt cross pair (y in HvVh or YHVVH) orthogonal entanglement between an old universe going thru a Process like mitosis
So, am I the only one here who thinks, OK, if our universe came to be via 2 branes colliding, where did those branes come from. If those branes came to be by something else colliding, where did those something elses come from and so on and so on and so on and so on etc. I can't help but think that none of this would exist without some kind of eternal intelligence to create or initiate it all.
i recently read that steven hawkings had said 'philosophy is dead' and that m-theory explained the great question 'why is there something instead of nothing' ?
Well professor, 'why is there m-theory instead of nothing' ?
think about it. Nothing means 'nothing at all' - ie. no potential, quantum flux, nothing.
God and Science are the same! believing God is faith... Believing such theory of the universe is a study but also based on faith that somehow sometime in the existance of energy matter is creates.. as with the derivation of E=mc^2 that mass can produce tremendous energy.. what if a tremendous energy is present then matter exist.. God and Science both originated from theories. so please quit comparing these two.
@lordfrozen29 In science, the word "theory" is an explanation of what the proven data gives us. Until the the data has been tested and peer-reviewed, it's just a hypothesis.
One doesn't need faith in science. Science backs it's hypothesis with evidence. It finds the evidence through repeatable and falsifiable experiments. And through the peer-review process. So there's no need to "believe". One just needs to study the data, and know.
Albert Einstein said "Science without Religion is Lame. Religion without science is blind." What if God made it so that Big Bang would happen? We don't know for sure. So please stop hating on God or science. God and science go along perfectly well. We are all giving our own blind opinions so don't hate on others blind opinion.
@itsmyluckyday27 That would mean that god was not the god of the bible. A god that complies with the scientific account of of creation (big bang, evolution etc) would be a god unconcerned with, and even unaware of humans. So all this praying and worshipping is completely futile.
@aardwolf71 Realized that just a bit earlier. Most scientist most likely Physicist's God are the Laws of Physics. I'm just starting to believe that. I'm 16 and a 1st year college student taking up BS Physics. Did some very advanced reading ang I get the point.
every man believes that he is %100 correct about everything. lol Ever notice how scientists have a close mind about things? How thye dont believe in things beyond our ability to comprehend and understand? If they cannot explain it, then to them, it does not exist. I trust no man in this life time. Thank you.
@MrMirthful "every man believes that he is %100 correct about everything. lol Ever notice how scientists have a close mind about things? How thye dont believe in things beyond our ability to comprehend and understand? If they cannot explain it, then to them, it does not exist. I trust no man in this life time. Thank you."
If that were a rule for every scientist then we wouldn't be where we are. Science was built around people believing things to be possible that were unobservable.
this is simply a theory and will remain a theory, as there is no way to prove it beyond doubt. Therefore it is completely pointless to have any debate whether God or science is the real deal. Science will solve many more mysteries in the future, but religion is going to be able to retreat into the unknown indefinitely... Just try to be familiar with both, these provide a good read..:)
A real scientist wouldn't be concerned with crop circles..he would immediately turn his attetion towards our collasping society and the enormous amounts of pullotion and destruction happening to our planet..Why the fuck our we looking at the stars when our planet is going to hell? Fix our planet first then worry bout outterspace
the best place in universe is heaven, the worst place in universe is hell. Jesus is alive everyday, repent of all sins and pray to him. Save the world.
It's a brilliant theory, but the whole concept strikes me as wrong - intuitively wrong. You see, if I imagine a horizontal line along axis X, and then a vertical line perpendicular to it at axis Y, then if these "separate" dimensions are truly separate, then they can't intersect at any point - not even potentially - since to say they do contradicts the point of being separate. I'll stick with Ervin Laszlo's metaverse theory.
@Imperativism I think that's why they are called 'parallel'. Imagine a whole line of parallel strings, now if you ripple one of them it'll touch another, creating a 'Big Bang' according to M-Theory. The metaverse theory is also a prominent theory, but while some take the metaverse literally, other physicists use them as theoretical models that are helpful in the math.
I'v been trying to figure out what the hell is going on around me since the age of 17ish, im now 25 and this is the conclusion iv came to according to what iv leard from science...
Life/everything is a bunch of exact reactions happening on a quantum level.
So if this is true, that means since the big bang, everthing is/was destined to happen in an exact way. Inculding my own thoughts...and that kinda scares me
Say what you like but the math behind it works. And m-theory does make predictions that can be verified in the near future. I don't want specialize in it (mainly because they don't make as much money) but i definitely think it should be considered a valid theory as any other.
A parallel universe would be impossible. This would mean that those 2 universes were an absolute infinite meaning that they would have had infinite time to create this universe. But hey it's just a theory, I think it's a little ridiculous if you ask me.
We're living among hot sparks on a spark gone cold after the metal from the forge of God was struck by the hammer of God. Or basically, our universe is just a super nova from a star that existed in a much larger universe. We can't see past the edge of our supernova(universe) past 15 billion years because of local (to our universe) space/time distortion. Meaning we're so far in the past of the larger universe that it's light doesn't reach us. The larger universe came from a s-nova and so on.
God heard this wheezing groaning sound & said, “What's that?!!” Then “Let there be light! And BANG! There was light! Behold! It was the Doctor's TARDIS! Then God said, “oh.” No. Time circles due to well proven Gen. Relativity. Because Time is circling Life makes certain the exact same pattern forms always so we aren't over-written by a new pattern forming every BANG or we never would have existed EVER! We “grow up in ALL WAYS into the Head, into Christ” (Eph. 4:15) to guarantee our existence!
Socalled M-theory is as incomplete as it gets. It's based on a few facts and numerous assumptions, and has made no useful predictions so far. Potentially it can predict anything, or nothing if you will. The whole thing might turn out to be nothing more than mumbo jumbo. But theists and science fiction freaks are having a good time, that's always something.
The Theta waves of the universe represent all of the creative knowledge that there is that is of nature. They contain multitudes of domains of families of frequencies each with a different resonant harmonic that is consequential to the average of the frequencies contained within each domain. it also includes communities of families of frequencies that in conjunction with others of the same incept the sequential and concurrent weaves of the energies to develop varied intrinsic lattices of matter
The quantum mechanical forces are stronger because they are caused by warps and curves in the 11th dimension of M-THEORY! It all fits. The theoretical physicists of M-THEORY claims that the parallel membranes within the 11th dimension have to ripple. These ripples are the warps and curves within the 11th dimension which is why they have a stronger effect on us and why we have matter and the universe itself from the collision of the parallel membranes i.e. the big bang.
@bass109 i'm religious too but we can't just jump to lazy assumptions. the math of string theory is intense and is solid proof for the existence of strings. Eternal inflation is proof of a multi-verse.
Does anyone else that believes in this theory ever start to think that one side is matter, and one completely of antimatter????!!!! it makes perfect sense, as when they touch, it results in catastrophic results, creating the parallel dimentions.
HOW DEEP DOES THE RABBIT HOLE GO? i'd rather take the red pill and be with the theoretical physicists than taking the blue pill and waking up and believing that our universe contains two separate set of laws that are incompatible with each other.
god this, god that, people, FUCK DEITY, if you don't like science, you probably use your little god to explain why you have or had failing grades in your science classes. so if you'd be so kind, let the people who this video was intended for, make their own opinions on this video.
@fenderdude64 i'm a christian but i still think m-theory is plausible. lol i'm actually watching this video because the stuff they talk about is profoundly fascinating. who knows, it might be heaven in the eleventh universe. there is no proof of god but i still believe. i think god might have created multiple universes. just my thought.
@fenderdude64 First of all this isn't even science. It's not even a theory. A scientific theory at least has some experimental verification. This so-called theory has none whatsoever. It's all mathematics not to mention these are all far out ideas. And even if proven, where did multiverse vacuum come from? This in itself runs into circular logic. So either the multiverse always existed or god always existed so nice try with who created god argument.
@fenderdude64 God and science can coexist. People like you really blow my mind. Even Francis Crick was a very religious person. There is more to God than simply searching for answers.
They still havn't answered the fundamental question of origins. Where did the brains or waves come from? How did these waves add energy or matter to the universe? And how did that unintelligent matter decide intelligently to become intelligent? Where's the logic? I was expecting something a little more profound than this. This is a complete cop-out from the question of origins.
I don't see the logic either in just 'creating' an answer to suit the question without any evidence of so. If assuming there must be an origin for everything, it would also be true for a 'god', which by definition could mean anything.
@COOTIEBUG01 The gravitational waves, or the particles gravitons, won't prove the M theory, but would prove that exist a theory of everything (like String theory, loop quantum gravity and so on) and put gravity and the other 3 forces together, this was the Einstein's dream. But would also be needed more proofs (Please correct me if I`m wrong)
@MrFyrfly Actually it can be tested. The LHC, once fully operational, will detect if theoretical particles (such as graviton?) exist or not and wether they appear/disappear from this universe. For now, everything they mentioned are based on mathematical models, which is half the proof. The observable evidence will come from the LHC experiments. Of course the LHC could completely disprove their ideas as well, in which case it means back to the drawing board.
@MrFyrfly Do you even understand what mathematical proof is? Gravity, Relativity, much of physics is based on mathematical proof, because its impossible to make it false. You can always check the equations for errors. Mathematics is universal, no matter what you are or where you're from, if you have the basic concept of numbers you can communicate with any intelligence across the universe. Besides, as I said before, its half the proof.
@zzzIdividedbyzerozzz Well, we can also feel gravity. Now, I'm not trying to say I'm mega great at math, because I'm not. But using math as proof just doesn't make sense to me.
well I commend you for your curiosity. Not a lot of 16 year olds surf youtube about physics. I hope your curiosity never fades and you continue on searching for the truth. :-)
@UpForDanceroid I find that an arrogant statement. You may be more intelligent than most 12 year old but I don't think you understand this apart from the concept. I touched on this in my 2nd year of college and the maths in this is insane, beyond my comprehension and I took honours mathematics, I have grasped as much as I could from Quantum mechanics and cosmology, but overall my knowledge is limited, then again my expertise is in Chemistry and Medicine (and in Chemistry you study a bit of this)
@UpForDanceroid I kind of don't like it when people nonchalantly mention their age when they think they are being smart, as if it makes them special. You can go hating on me but this is just what I think.
@EvieProductionz You have no point nor reason to respond impolitely to this comment and not leaving it alone, if you did not care you would not reply, moreover, why did you send this to ME? So that I read it? Why not in the comment section. I am 13 now.
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
@beaujay It depends on how you define parallel. The traditional euclidean definition allows all sorts of "parallel" things to intersect in other geometries, purely because of the way it is defined.
@ArcaneInquisitor Orthogonal is usually what is used to describe a more general type of parallel (general as in as many dimensions as you want to consider).
@ArcaneInquisitor Oh sorry, that was stupid, Orthogonal is anti-parallel...perpendicular. Sorry for that, but nonetheless one definition usually implies the other.
@jazzaste123 i agree with that. but we are still young and divided. maybe we have to evolve to a point where we are ABLE to become one with that being. and if time and space goes on forever, imagine what's out there.
@BoosieBoosieBoosie i think we are all connected to each other because we all are each other as there is only one of us in reality but we do have the illusion of being separate from each other but again its an illusion we are connected to the oneness always in all ways thus to one an other infinitely as time doesnt exist i think whatever we can imagine out there will be out there as all possibilities are possible cool hey i love thinking about this subject amazing man peace bro
@jazzaste123 your an idiot, you say you love thinking about this subject but this subject you are talking about isnt related to M theory or Physics at all, its just your hippy self going on about peace and shit.
Why are people saying this theory is bullcrap...you don't know it either, These scienctiest could be correct or they could be wrong. We won't know until we get more evidence, but the only way you can say this theory is bullcrap is if you actually knew how the universe was born.
what a load of bullshit. where is there any proof? all these scientists can introduce this crap without a shred of evidence just because of their big names. they are just speculating, the same way that people used to speculate that the earth was flat, when they really had no idea what they were talking about. If i were to try to introduce any personal theory in college with as much lack of evidence i would be promptly failed from the course.
@Porojukaha well what is your theory then? hmmm? come on enlighten us all... their evidence is mathematics, string theory came first along with supergravity, these 2 contradicted each other but they found a way using clever maths and knowledge to bring the 2 theories together which became m theory, it is a very possible theory but its only a theory!
@TurboTheTurtwig It is real. I don't have proof that it's real. but the big questions like "where did the forces in nature come from?" drives me crazy if m-theory isn't real. that's why i'm deeply convinced by m-theory. it explains everything.
@MikeyMyhre your stupid really? no one has said that everything has been completely solved. these scientists, when i say i these i mean most physicists around the world, believe the most reliable explanation for how our universe came to be is M theory, and m theory explains how there are other universes aswell and that the branes ripple and collide creating universes, no one has said that they know why they ripple YET! you are all just too arogant to give these scientisits a chance.
the hard thing to grasp from this interpretation of how the universe started is how do these guys know? but the thing is they dont know they are just guessing at infinite possiblitilies that make up the theory of everything, everything: gravity, quantum, string theory ect are just theories. we may never kno the true nature of the origins of the universe,
but i do beleive the universe is what we believe it to be, im not a passivist, but whos to say that the universe around us is just not a projection of our subconscious minds mangled together 2 make up which each one of us believe to be reality, parallel unviverses formed to create our universe but how did those universes form? by other collisions? if thats true there is infinite universes
but what is infinite just a human concept of neverending, it is not the 'neverending' that is important it is the 'human concept' that is, because our minds created infinite, the universe is the structure of the infinite dimension: our subconscious.
the thing is, we don't know the science behind this shit. its like 100 years ago we didn't know about quantum physics or hundreds of years ago we thought the world was flat etc. but one day we will figure it out. oh and by the way, all this wasn't created by god snapping his finger, that's what they tell people so we don't find the real truth.
The only threat to an answer for everything is the possibility that no one will argue about anything anymore. I had an argument with a physicists about global climate change that flirted at time with the well-poisoning comments I've read hear. Please don't try to shut each other up - KEEP ARGUING! You may just find inspiration in the words of someone entirely ignorant of entropy and gravity. By the way, I'm a psyc/linguistics inter-disciplinarian; NO SCIENCE FOR ME, right?
at the end of the day how did something get created from nothing whether it be a string, a membrane etc etc whats the original source. So far science hasnt got a fucking clue. And I can't see they ever will
@orams1 you are so ignorant, you must think about how far science has come over the past century, we have learnt more about ourselves over the last 100 years than ever before. you obviously dont understand string and m theory, they both co exist together, string theory describes how everything is built up together and m theory describes the source of that everything. You are just too ignorant to understand anything
But this crap, supersymmetry and bosons and D-branes and black p-branes, ripples, parallel universes, what the fuck IS this shit? Can't I ask? Can't I say, Jesus, seems like they're using weird words to describe nothing whatsoever? Some game of what? Proving that there was a big bang? We don't know that there WAS a big bang. The big bang has a lot of holes. How nothing become everything is one of them. And now of course we have parallel universes. Why? Why not, seems to be the answer.
And something else. The gobbledygook factor in the explanations for string and M-theory are very high. So the assumptions are these: I don't get it. But other people smarter than me do. Or you could take my position: I'm a relatively intelligent person, and these theories are full of gobbledygook. I can't follow the damned theory. I can listen to Einstein's and come away with a few ideas. Space is relative and matter and energy are the same.
Before another person calls me stupid, I want to explain my position. This discipline, the realm of quarks and universes (and as a writer, I do find the idea that we have to make the word "universe" plaural bothersome), lacks hard evidence for many of its basic theories. These theories take hold like religion, with people creating livelihoods defending them and making sure every other theory is affected by them. And it deserves critique.
I don't understand how they arrived at these conclusions. However, things like quarks do have myriads of evidence if you study even basic particle physics. Comparing this to religion is foolish since it is based off of things we already know. You can ask what they mean when they use such jargon; however, you shouldn't call it foolish if you don't even know the basics. Theories like these are up for criticism for people who actually understand them. A theory that has been rigorously
@brelfan worked on for 20 years by the most brilliant minds is not something that anyone with a sensible mind would call asinine. That just makes the common person look conceited and complacent. Since you're a writer, you really can't have a say in this if you don't know anything about it. Quantum physics is counter-intuitive to begin with; you don't think we would discover or think of peculiar stuff on such a minuscule level? You're not a moron; however, you're sounding like one.
@Polterguist Who called anything asinine? I I know that physicists are sometimes brilliant people... and like all people, do some good. Do some harm. I don't think they've got great science here. I think they've theories for the sake of theories. I think some of the theories are ludicrous. I understand that evidence in these cases are is hard to come across. But there MUST be some before everyone concludes these theories are valid.
@brelfan Geologists, palentaologists, doctors, zoologists all have to have to back up theories with evidence. They can't invent them out of nothing. They can't have ridiculous terms like "singularity," and by the way, we don't know what a singularity is. But once it blew up, it had strings and membranes, we theorize. We're going to spend billions of Euros to figure out what a Higgs particle is.
@brelfan Again, physicists don't invent the theories out of nothing. The word singularity is used to describe black holes and the big bang. Note: They don't know how such a singularity produced those theoretical objects. Theoretical physicists still have trouble incorporating gravity in with the other three fundamental forces. If you ask me, it's work funding. We've discovered so much using particle accelerators. The brilliant shouldn't have to pay for the incompetence of the average.
@Polterguist These theories have zealots who can't drop them when the evidence isn't there. The temperature of the universe doesn't coincide with the big bang theory.They come up with "inflation." The galaxies move faster than mathematical calculations predicted. They invent "dark matter." Nobody has evidence for dark matter other than poor math. Nobody has aevidence for a big bang. Your "20 years..." blah blah is "foolish," a rationalization to avoid thinking for yourself.
@brelfan They reconfigurate the theories if evidence to the contrary arises. Do you have a better idea for theoretical physics? Inflation is plausible to them. Moreover, there is evidence for dark matter due to the fact that the edges of galaxies aren't flying off into space. There's myriads of evidence for the big bang: Cosmic background radiation, the accelerating expansion of the universe, and much more than I can name. You're being a conceited moron. I don't think for myself? You
@brelfan crossed the line with that one. You're arguments aren't any better than those of a creationist. You're just a common person who thinks he can shoot down years upon years of scientific theories that he knows nothing about. Sounds like the epitome of religion. Back to the theories, they are based on what is currently confirmed. That's how theoretical physics work. They come up with theories to explain that which is yet to be explored.
@rickballance your far too ignorant, what started the membranes then? please tell me id love to know! im not saying that there is a god but there might be, in my opinion the best religion is Islam because if interpruted correctly the Quran states string theory and states that there is more than one universe, a multiverse. Its people like you who make science seem ignorant and disowning, science hasnt ever said that there is no God, its just saying that M theory is probable.
You should not call this the complete explanation, you should call this a THEORY
MaaNonu123 1 month ago
@MaaNonu123 this isn't even a theory because even a scientific theory has observable and experimental evidence. This is nothing more than a bunch of sci-fi garbage made up by sci-fi nerds.
ajhrockerboy6 1 week ago
an parent universe in polymer chain of multi-universe exp. mitosis dividing this reality or universe from 1 superimposed with a parallel via superposition in entanglement
AnuSuroh 1 month ago
I believe the big bang is initiated by energy which cant be created, Y in omt cross pair (y in HvVh or YHVVH) orthogonal entanglement between an old universe going thru a Process like mitosis
AnuSuroh 1 month ago
@AnuSuroh a.k.a, Eternal Intelligence!
oshirowanen 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So, am I the only one here who thinks, OK, if our universe came to be via 2 branes colliding, where did those branes come from. If those branes came to be by something else colliding, where did those something elses come from and so on and so on and so on and so on etc. I can't help but think that none of this would exist without some kind of eternal intelligence to create or initiate it all.
oshirowanen 1 month ago
Comment removed
oshirowanen 1 month ago
Comment removed
oshirowanen 1 month ago
i recently read that steven hawkings had said 'philosophy is dead' and that m-theory explained the great question 'why is there something instead of nothing' ?
Well professor, 'why is there m-theory instead of nothing' ?
think about it. Nothing means 'nothing at all' - ie. no potential, quantum flux, nothing.
wtf was he on about ? emperors new clothes.
markflcortez 1 month ago
What made the membrane? Where is this evidence for this or is it just a metaphysical theory?
snowmanbob101 3 months ago
This is bullshit
187BURNZY 4 months ago
“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.”
lomaro666 4 months ago
I am God. Nerd tits or GTFO.
1984Sketch 4 months ago
God and Science are the same! believing God is faith... Believing such theory of the universe is a study but also based on faith that somehow sometime in the existance of energy matter is creates.. as with the derivation of E=mc^2 that mass can produce tremendous energy.. what if a tremendous energy is present then matter exist.. God and Science both originated from theories. so please quit comparing these two.
lordfrozen29 5 months ago
@lordfrozen29 In science, the word "theory" is an explanation of what the proven data gives us. Until the the data has been tested and peer-reviewed, it's just a hypothesis.
One doesn't need faith in science. Science backs it's hypothesis with evidence. It finds the evidence through repeatable and falsifiable experiments. And through the peer-review process. So there's no need to "believe". One just needs to study the data, and know.
God is just an ideology. Not a theory.
aardwolf71 5 months ago
Albert Einstein said "Science without Religion is Lame. Religion without science is blind." What if God made it so that Big Bang would happen? We don't know for sure. So please stop hating on God or science. God and science go along perfectly well. We are all giving our own blind opinions so don't hate on others blind opinion.
itsmyluckyday27 6 months ago
@itsmyluckyday27 That would mean that god was not the god of the bible. A god that complies with the scientific account of of creation (big bang, evolution etc) would be a god unconcerned with, and even unaware of humans. So all this praying and worshipping is completely futile.
aardwolf71 5 months ago
@aardwolf71 Realized that just a bit earlier. Most scientist most likely Physicist's God are the Laws of Physics. I'm just starting to believe that. I'm 16 and a 1st year college student taking up BS Physics. Did some very advanced reading ang I get the point.
itsmyluckyday27 5 months ago
@itsmyluckyday27 Keep it up. Well done.
aardwolf71 5 months ago
@aardwolf71 I wouldn't say unaware just unconcerned with.
TheBloodyBlackJackal 5 months ago
every man believes that he is %100 correct about everything. lol Ever notice how scientists have a close mind about things? How thye dont believe in things beyond our ability to comprehend and understand? If they cannot explain it, then to them, it does not exist. I trust no man in this life time. Thank you.
MrMirthful 6 months ago
I got this or a talking snake... hmm
lightitupfool 6 months ago
@MrMirthful "every man believes that he is %100 correct about everything. lol Ever notice how scientists have a close mind about things? How thye dont believe in things beyond our ability to comprehend and understand? If they cannot explain it, then to them, it does not exist. I trust no man in this life time. Thank you."
If that were a rule for every scientist then we wouldn't be where we are. Science was built around people believing things to be possible that were unobservable.
TheBloodyBlackJackal 5 months ago
this is simply a theory and will remain a theory, as there is no way to prove it beyond doubt. Therefore it is completely pointless to have any debate whether God or science is the real deal. Science will solve many more mysteries in the future, but religion is going to be able to retreat into the unknown indefinitely... Just try to be familiar with both, these provide a good read..:)
nyali2 6 months ago
God Almighty expanding voice spoke the expanding universe into existance! Jesus is god!
bass109 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A real scientist wouldn't be concerned with crop circles..he would immediately turn his attetion towards our collasping society and the enormous amounts of pullotion and destruction happening to our planet..Why the fuck our we looking at the stars when our planet is going to hell? Fix our planet first then worry bout outterspace
TheMidwestsk8ter 6 months ago 2
the best place in universe is heaven, the worst place in universe is hell. Jesus is alive everyday, repent of all sins and pray to him. Save the world.
bass109 7 months ago
My name is Commander Shepard, and the answer is element Zero.
darkyodd 8 months ago
"It just sort of changes." Ah, the exactness.
JeffersonDinedAlone 8 months ago
It's a brilliant theory, but the whole concept strikes me as wrong - intuitively wrong. You see, if I imagine a horizontal line along axis X, and then a vertical line perpendicular to it at axis Y, then if these "separate" dimensions are truly separate, then they can't intersect at any point - not even potentially - since to say they do contradicts the point of being separate. I'll stick with Ervin Laszlo's metaverse theory.
Imperativism 8 months ago
@Imperativism I think that's why they are called 'parallel'. Imagine a whole line of parallel strings, now if you ripple one of them it'll touch another, creating a 'Big Bang' according to M-Theory. The metaverse theory is also a prominent theory, but while some take the metaverse literally, other physicists use them as theoretical models that are helpful in the math.
MonicaKn17 7 months ago
Quantum physics makes the bible appear well written.
danthecurious 8 months ago
@danthecurious
Maybe not that far :)
MonicaKn17 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Question, is there such a thing as "random"?
I'v been trying to figure out what the hell is going on around me since the age of 17ish, im now 25 and this is the conclusion iv came to according to what iv leard from science...
Life/everything is a bunch of exact reactions happening on a quantum level.
So if this is true, that means since the big bang, everthing is/was destined to happen in an exact way. Inculding my own thoughts...and that kinda scares me
Canadian2 8 months ago
Given the possibility of eternity, It's amazing how young the universe is.
ronljudd 9 months ago
hahahahahahahahahaahaahaahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahaahahhahahahahahahaahhahahahaahahahhahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaahahahahhahahahahahahahahahaahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
1billion1deaths1 9 months ago
@1billion1deaths1
my thoughts exactly. what a gigantic pile of crap this is...at least the masses feel that they are being "enlightened" by it.
Tartersauce101 9 months ago
@Tartersauce101
Say what you like but the math behind it works. And m-theory does make predictions that can be verified in the near future. I don't want specialize in it (mainly because they don't make as much money) but i definitely think it should be considered a valid theory as any other.
MonicaKn17 7 months ago
M theory = Materialist Desperation Theory
Galmozzi99 9 months ago
@Galmozzi99
thats a good one. i'll remember it :)
Tartersauce101 9 months ago
@Galmozzi99 You have another scientific/mathematical theory? If you do, go ahead and dish it out. If not, don't shit on something.
HimesInu 8 months ago
@HimesInu Like M-Theory, anything I would propose would (by necessity) also be unobservable and untestable. Hardly "scientific", just like M-Theory.
Galmozzi99 8 months ago
@Galmozzi99 And if you are making a comment on the fact that no one knows what the M stands for, and nothing more, my apologies.
HimesInu 8 months ago
@Galmozzi99 LOL
6630mcdo 4 months ago
MOM-theory.
iwanttocrashmybike 10 months ago
A parallel universe would be impossible. This would mean that those 2 universes were an absolute infinite meaning that they would have had infinite time to create this universe. But hey it's just a theory, I think it's a little ridiculous if you ask me.
sports444life 10 months ago
We're living among hot sparks on a spark gone cold after the metal from the forge of God was struck by the hammer of God. Or basically, our universe is just a super nova from a star that existed in a much larger universe. We can't see past the edge of our supernova(universe) past 15 billion years because of local (to our universe) space/time distortion. Meaning we're so far in the past of the larger universe that it's light doesn't reach us. The larger universe came from a s-nova and so on.
thinkrealify 10 months ago
God heard this wheezing groaning sound & said, “What's that?!!” Then “Let there be light! And BANG! There was light! Behold! It was the Doctor's TARDIS! Then God said, “oh.” No. Time circles due to well proven Gen. Relativity. Because Time is circling Life makes certain the exact same pattern forms always so we aren't over-written by a new pattern forming every BANG or we never would have existed EVER! We “grow up in ALL WAYS into the Head, into Christ” (Eph. 4:15) to guarantee our existence!
OmegaSeekerr 10 months ago
we as people do not know shit about the universe....
its almost pointless to bring the subject,
in my opinion what we know, is by what we see, and you get reactions from it in
your brain, a visual burrier.
smoke weed, peace
grotonunited 11 months ago
Socalled M-theory is as incomplete as it gets. It's based on a few facts and numerous assumptions, and has made no useful predictions so far. Potentially it can predict anything, or nothing if you will. The whole thing might turn out to be nothing more than mumbo jumbo. But theists and science fiction freaks are having a good time, that's always something.
LochlanachViking 11 months ago
The Theta waves of the universe represent all of the creative knowledge that there is that is of nature. They contain multitudes of domains of families of frequencies each with a different resonant harmonic that is consequential to the average of the frequencies contained within each domain. it also includes communities of families of frequencies that in conjunction with others of the same incept the sequential and concurrent weaves of the energies to develop varied intrinsic lattices of matter
jqs1943 11 months ago
Comment removed
Awhiffofsuspicion 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The quantum mechanical forces are stronger because they are caused by warps and curves in the 11th dimension of M-THEORY! It all fits. The theoretical physicists of M-THEORY claims that the parallel membranes within the 11th dimension have to ripple. These ripples are the warps and curves within the 11th dimension which is why they have a stronger effect on us and why we have matter and the universe itself from the collision of the parallel membranes i.e. the big bang.
FallofDarkness55 11 months ago
magnets...
Cheerfuloctopus 11 months ago
M-theory: Where M stands for Masturbation
It would make sense since physicists agree that the Universe started with a "BIG BANG" : )
envin3 11 months ago
the mind of man will never understand gods hole creation. The universe is ruled under Jesus christ
bass109 1 year ago
@bass109 i'm religious too but we can't just jump to lazy assumptions. the math of string theory is intense and is solid proof for the existence of strings. Eternal inflation is proof of a multi-verse.
henf5671 1 year ago
@bass109 haha wow, you damn christians .
DILLVIDS 11 months ago
@bass109 your a very lazy Christian who grossly underestimates his species
MrAnimeStealth 10 months ago
@bass109 the universe is not ruled under anyone or anything except the laws of physics itself.
dylan111291 7 months ago
Does anyone else that believes in this theory ever start to think that one side is matter, and one completely of antimatter????!!!! it makes perfect sense, as when they touch, it results in catastrophic results, creating the parallel dimentions.
ThePs3Scene 1 year ago 2
@ThePs3Scene yeah like non- existence and existence?
dylan111291 7 months ago
This is so full of crap -__-
MutantNinjaFly 1 year ago
@MutantNinjaFly do you belive in god? Because the story of adam and eve and god is all bullshit. atleast this is belivable
DILLVIDS 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HOW DEEP DOES THE RABBIT HOLE GO? i'd rather take the red pill and be with the theoretical physicists than taking the blue pill and waking up and believing that our universe contains two separate set of laws that are incompatible with each other.
FallofDarkness55 1 year ago
also, sex is good
fenderdude64 1 year ago 2
@fenderdude64
but, unfortunatley, overraterd.
QW5ub255bW91cw 1 year ago
god this, god that, people, FUCK DEITY, if you don't like science, you probably use your little god to explain why you have or had failing grades in your science classes. so if you'd be so kind, let the people who this video was intended for, make their own opinions on this video.
fenderdude64 1 year ago 18
Comment removed
cunnidvd 4 months ago
Comment removed
cunnidvd 4 months ago
@fenderdude64 you make yourself sound just as ignorant as them ,if not more because you let smallminded people trample through your peace of mind...
fpsZach1 3 months ago
@fenderdude64 i'm a christian but i still think m-theory is plausible. lol i'm actually watching this video because the stuff they talk about is profoundly fascinating. who knows, it might be heaven in the eleventh universe. there is no proof of god but i still believe. i think god might have created multiple universes. just my thought.
ironmaidenowns 3 months ago
@fenderdude64 First of all this isn't even science. It's not even a theory. A scientific theory at least has some experimental verification. This so-called theory has none whatsoever. It's all mathematics not to mention these are all far out ideas. And even if proven, where did multiverse vacuum come from? This in itself runs into circular logic. So either the multiverse always existed or god always existed so nice try with who created god argument.
ajhrockerboy6 1 month ago
@fenderdude64 God and science can coexist. People like you really blow my mind. Even Francis Crick was a very religious person. There is more to God than simply searching for answers.
Thebrowntown1234 1 month ago
no one that has watched this video understands string theory, nor quantum field theory, no general relatvity
x1x2x3ct 1 year ago
Wasn't the background song used in an EVE ONLINE Trailer? watch?v=xnL3slAfbuM
Dimension182 1 year ago
Comment removed
kvissety 1 year ago
@kvissety yeah, and God makes soooooooo much more sense -___-
rpsmith014 1 year ago
This is somewhat interesting even though i only understood part of the math....
I'm 14
Randumfreak 1 year ago
Err... Out of curiosity, is this some sort of family reunion? I'm 16, too. ^^
Elena9535 1 year ago
i have found the real theory of everything, see my channel for transcendental hyperthought
andybrimmer529 1 year ago
To write what you just did, you ONLY use MATHEMATICS!
bibibiloi 1 year ago
We should all be proud of ourselves for evolving this far. Great job everybody! :P
timwood1104 1 year ago
They still havn't answered the fundamental question of origins. Where did the brains or waves come from? How did these waves add energy or matter to the universe? And how did that unintelligent matter decide intelligently to become intelligent? Where's the logic? I was expecting something a little more profound than this. This is a complete cop-out from the question of origins.
jesusfreak2017 1 year ago
@jesusfreak2017.
I don't see the logic either in just 'creating' an answer to suit the question without any evidence of so. If assuming there must be an origin for everything, it would also be true for a 'god', which by definition could mean anything.
SeasonsOfBlue 1 year ago
hey jesusfreak2017, agreed.
leraginasian 1 year ago
Question: will the discovery of gravitational waves disprove or prove M theory?
COOTIEBUG01 1 year ago
@COOTIEBUG01 The gravitational waves, or the particles gravitons, won't prove the M theory, but would prove that exist a theory of everything (like String theory, loop quantum gravity and so on) and put gravity and the other 3 forces together, this was the Einstein's dream. But would also be needed more proofs (Please correct me if I`m wrong)
CaraNitrus 1 year ago
What the hell? There's no evidence for this! It can't be tested!
MrFyrfly 1 year ago
@MrFyrfly Actually it can be tested. The LHC, once fully operational, will detect if theoretical particles (such as graviton?) exist or not and wether they appear/disappear from this universe. For now, everything they mentioned are based on mathematical models, which is half the proof. The observable evidence will come from the LHC experiments. Of course the LHC could completely disprove their ideas as well, in which case it means back to the drawing board.
zzzIdividedbyzerozzz 1 year ago
@zzzIdividedbyzerozzz
what about graviolis?
xXurbadXx 1 year ago
@zzzIdividedbyzerozzz I don't believe in mathematical proof. Just physical and observable.
MrFyrfly 1 year ago
@MrFyrfly Do you even understand what mathematical proof is? Gravity, Relativity, much of physics is based on mathematical proof, because its impossible to make it false. You can always check the equations for errors. Mathematics is universal, no matter what you are or where you're from, if you have the basic concept of numbers you can communicate with any intelligence across the universe. Besides, as I said before, its half the proof.
zzzIdividedbyzerozzz 1 year ago
@zzzIdividedbyzerozzz Well, we can also feel gravity. Now, I'm not trying to say I'm mega great at math, because I'm not. But using math as proof just doesn't make sense to me.
MrFyrfly 1 year ago
@MrFyrfly
because your brain is limited to understand the vast mathematical theories in physics.
kaminoneh 1 year ago
@kaminoneh I'm just 16. No 16 year old is that good in physics.
MrFyrfly 1 year ago
@MrFyrfly
I apologies for my ignorance.
kaminoneh 1 year ago
@kaminoneh Lol, it's fine.
MrFyrfly 1 year ago
@MrFyrfly
well I commend you for your curiosity. Not a lot of 16 year olds surf youtube about physics. I hope your curiosity never fades and you continue on searching for the truth. :-)
kaminoneh 1 year ago
@kaminoneh Im 16 lol just saying =)
Kira2351 1 year ago
@kaminoneh Your right, and im 12 and understand this very well. Mostly I dont interact with other people my age very well, with adults mostly.
UpForDanceroid 1 year ago 7
@UpForDanceroid I find that an arrogant statement. You may be more intelligent than most 12 year old but I don't think you understand this apart from the concept. I touched on this in my 2nd year of college and the maths in this is insane, beyond my comprehension and I took honours mathematics, I have grasped as much as I could from Quantum mechanics and cosmology, but overall my knowledge is limited, then again my expertise is in Chemistry and Medicine (and in Chemistry you study a bit of this)
MedicalChemistry 1 year ago
@UpForDanceroid
If so you have a gift. Use it fully. Your mind may be limitless.
supersajin 1 year ago
@UpForDanceroid how does it come that your profile says you're 20? little jump to a parallel universe? ;-)
stefan79798 1 year ago
@stefan79798 I said that so I could log into youtube. ;-)
UpForDanceroid 1 year ago
@UpForDanceroid Well that's good. "If a theory cannot be explained to a child, then the theory is probably worthless." - Albert Einsteins
Daniel570C 1 year ago
@UpForDanceroid Well that's good. "If a theory cannot be explained to a child, then the theory is probably worthless." -Albert Einstein
Daniel570C 1 year ago
@UpForDanceroid I kind of don't like it when people nonchalantly mention their age when they think they are being smart, as if it makes them special. You can go hating on me but this is just what I think.
EvieProductionz 9 months ago
@EvieProductionz You have no point nor reason to respond impolitely to this comment and not leaving it alone, if you did not care you would not reply, moreover, why did you send this to ME? So that I read it? Why not in the comment section. I am 13 now.
UpForDanceroid 9 months ago
@EvieProductionz Also, you think I'm being not being smart? -.-
UpForDanceroid 9 months ago
@EvieProductionz You're right. Anyone mentioning their age is irrelevant.
JeffersonDinedAlone 8 months ago
@JeffersonDinedAlone I am a bright young man. President Truman told me that himself, and you can't argue with an authority like that.
gamesbok 7 months ago
@zzzIdividedbyzerozzz you're absolutely right.
Mathematics is truly a universal language.
kaminoneh 1 year ago
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
lavernedi 1 year ago
how can two parrallel things ever intersect? perhaps a slight misnomer.
beaujay 1 year ago
@beaujay It depends on how you define parallel. The traditional euclidean definition allows all sorts of "parallel" things to intersect in other geometries, purely because of the way it is defined.
ArcaneInquisitor 1 year ago
@ArcaneInquisitor Orthogonal is usually what is used to describe a more general type of parallel (general as in as many dimensions as you want to consider).
ArcaneInquisitor 1 year ago
@ArcaneInquisitor Oh sorry, that was stupid, Orthogonal is anti-parallel...perpendicular. Sorry for that, but nonetheless one definition usually implies the other.
ArcaneInquisitor 1 year ago
@beaujay they dont intersect, its all to do with strings, each parrel brane basically sends these closed strings back and forth.
fsxworldtourfilms 1 year ago
we make thought matter literally matter we are oneness being all possibilitys of her self we are infinite beings in nature we are forever
jazzaste123 1 year ago
@jazzaste123 i agree with that. but we are still young and divided. maybe we have to evolve to a point where we are ABLE to become one with that being. and if time and space goes on forever, imagine what's out there.
BoosieBoosieBoosie 1 year ago
@BoosieBoosieBoosie i think we are all connected to each other because we all are each other as there is only one of us in reality but we do have the illusion of being separate from each other but again its an illusion we are connected to the oneness always in all ways thus to one an other infinitely as time doesnt exist i think whatever we can imagine out there will be out there as all possibilities are possible cool hey i love thinking about this subject amazing man peace bro
jazzaste123 1 year ago
@jazzaste123 your an idiot, you say you love thinking about this subject but this subject you are talking about isnt related to M theory or Physics at all, its just your hippy self going on about peace and shit.
fsxworldtourfilms 1 year ago
@fsxworldtourfilms hahahahahahahahahahahaha what everrrrrrrrrrrrr
jazzaste123 1 year ago
@jazzaste123 ... you are stupid
fsxworldtourfilms 1 year ago
@fsxworldtourfilms thank u muppet
jazzaste123 1 year ago
Why are people saying this theory is bullcrap...you don't know it either, These scienctiest could be correct or they could be wrong. We won't know until we get more evidence, but the only way you can say this theory is bullcrap is if you actually knew how the universe was born.
tomcatpilot13 1 year ago
what a load of bullshit. where is there any proof? all these scientists can introduce this crap without a shred of evidence just because of their big names. they are just speculating, the same way that people used to speculate that the earth was flat, when they really had no idea what they were talking about. If i were to try to introduce any personal theory in college with as much lack of evidence i would be promptly failed from the course.
Porojukaha 1 year ago
@Porojukaha well what is your theory then? hmmm? come on enlighten us all... their evidence is mathematics, string theory came first along with supergravity, these 2 contradicted each other but they found a way using clever maths and knowledge to bring the 2 theories together which became m theory, it is a very possible theory but its only a theory!
fsxworldtourfilms 1 year ago
This is probably real.
TurboTheTurtwig 1 year ago 8
@TurboTheTurtwig It is real. I don't have proof that it's real. but the big questions like "where did the forces in nature come from?" drives me crazy if m-theory isn't real. that's why i'm deeply convinced by m-theory. it explains everything.
FallofDarkness55 11 months ago
that's when you say, well... uhh we don't know, thats not the point, you see these ripple man...
MikeyMyhre 1 year ago
what happens before the ripples... no explanation... huh...
MikeyMyhre 1 year ago
@MikeyMyhre its not god moron
FIGHTFANNERD3 1 year ago
@MikeyMyhre your stupid really? no one has said that everything has been completely solved. these scientists, when i say i these i mean most physicists around the world, believe the most reliable explanation for how our universe came to be is M theory, and m theory explains how there are other universes aswell and that the branes ripple and collide creating universes, no one has said that they know why they ripple YET! you are all just too arogant to give these scientisits a chance.
fsxworldtourfilms 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well which is? Inflation? Bubble Nucleation? Rippling Branes? Each is a contradictory theory.
newmac 1 year ago
Well which is? Inflation? Bubble Nucleation? Rippling Branes? Each is a contradictory theory.
newmac 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the hard thing to grasp from this interpretation of how the universe started is how do these guys know? but the thing is they dont know they are just guessing at infinite possiblitilies that make up the theory of everything, everything: gravity, quantum, string theory ect are just theories. we may never kno the true nature of the origins of the universe,
XTCspacer 1 year ago
@XTCspacer i tooootally agree with you.
MikeyMyhre 1 year ago
Comment removed
XTCspacer 1 year ago
@MikeyMyhre thank u, atleast some1 else can contemplate, the bilateral mindset to interpretting the universe lyk me. u r a wise man
XTCspacer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
but i do beleive the universe is what we believe it to be, im not a passivist, but whos to say that the universe around us is just not a projection of our subconscious minds mangled together 2 make up which each one of us believe to be reality, parallel unviverses formed to create our universe but how did those universes form? by other collisions? if thats true there is infinite universes
XTCspacer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
but what is infinite just a human concept of neverending, it is not the 'neverending' that is important it is the 'human concept' that is, because our minds created infinite, the universe is the structure of the infinite dimension: our subconscious.
maybe..
XTCspacer 1 year ago
Comment removed
XTCspacer 1 year ago
Comment removed
XTCspacer 1 year ago
Comment removed
XTCspacer 1 year ago
Comment removed
XTCspacer 1 year ago
the thing is, we don't know the science behind this shit. its like 100 years ago we didn't know about quantum physics or hundreds of years ago we thought the world was flat etc. but one day we will figure it out. oh and by the way, all this wasn't created by god snapping his finger, that's what they tell people so we don't find the real truth.
IamMuff 1 year ago
@IamMuff they ?
tisilwm 1 year ago
The only threat to an answer for everything is the possibility that no one will argue about anything anymore. I had an argument with a physicists about global climate change that flirted at time with the well-poisoning comments I've read hear. Please don't try to shut each other up - KEEP ARGUING! You may just find inspiration in the words of someone entirely ignorant of entropy and gravity. By the way, I'm a psyc/linguistics inter-disciplinarian; NO SCIENCE FOR ME, right?
meagerblack 1 year ago
sounds like a load of shit
thaifan88 1 year ago
at the end of the day how did something get created from nothing whether it be a string, a membrane etc etc whats the original source. So far science hasnt got a fucking clue. And I can't see they ever will
orams1 1 year ago
@orams1 you are so ignorant, you must think about how far science has come over the past century, we have learnt more about ourselves over the last 100 years than ever before. you obviously dont understand string and m theory, they both co exist together, string theory describes how everything is built up together and m theory describes the source of that everything. You are just too ignorant to understand anything
fsxworldtourfilms 1 year ago
But this crap, supersymmetry and bosons and D-branes and black p-branes, ripples, parallel universes, what the fuck IS this shit? Can't I ask? Can't I say, Jesus, seems like they're using weird words to describe nothing whatsoever? Some game of what? Proving that there was a big bang? We don't know that there WAS a big bang. The big bang has a lot of holes. How nothing become everything is one of them. And now of course we have parallel universes. Why? Why not, seems to be the answer.
brelfan 1 year ago
@brelfan was the big bang out side the laws of physics so it created it self to exist
bellyzbad 1 year ago
And something else. The gobbledygook factor in the explanations for string and M-theory are very high. So the assumptions are these: I don't get it. But other people smarter than me do. Or you could take my position: I'm a relatively intelligent person, and these theories are full of gobbledygook. I can't follow the damned theory. I can listen to Einstein's and come away with a few ideas. Space is relative and matter and energy are the same.
brelfan 1 year ago
Before another person calls me stupid, I want to explain my position. This discipline, the realm of quarks and universes (and as a writer, I do find the idea that we have to make the word "universe" plaural bothersome), lacks hard evidence for many of its basic theories. These theories take hold like religion, with people creating livelihoods defending them and making sure every other theory is affected by them. And it deserves critique.
brelfan 1 year ago
I don't understand how they arrived at these conclusions. However, things like quarks do have myriads of evidence if you study even basic particle physics. Comparing this to religion is foolish since it is based off of things we already know. You can ask what they mean when they use such jargon; however, you shouldn't call it foolish if you don't even know the basics. Theories like these are up for criticism for people who actually understand them. A theory that has been rigorously
Polterguist 1 year ago
@brelfan worked on for 20 years by the most brilliant minds is not something that anyone with a sensible mind would call asinine. That just makes the common person look conceited and complacent. Since you're a writer, you really can't have a say in this if you don't know anything about it. Quantum physics is counter-intuitive to begin with; you don't think we would discover or think of peculiar stuff on such a minuscule level? You're not a moron; however, you're sounding like one.
Polterguist 1 year ago
@Polterguist Who called anything asinine? I I know that physicists are sometimes brilliant people... and like all people, do some good. Do some harm. I don't think they've got great science here. I think they've theories for the sake of theories. I think some of the theories are ludicrous. I understand that evidence in these cases are is hard to come across. But there MUST be some before everyone concludes these theories are valid.
brelfan 1 year ago
@brelfan Geologists, palentaologists, doctors, zoologists all have to have to back up theories with evidence. They can't invent them out of nothing. They can't have ridiculous terms like "singularity," and by the way, we don't know what a singularity is. But once it blew up, it had strings and membranes, we theorize. We're going to spend billions of Euros to figure out what a Higgs particle is.
brelfan 1 year ago
@brelfan Again, physicists don't invent the theories out of nothing. The word singularity is used to describe black holes and the big bang. Note: They don't know how such a singularity produced those theoretical objects. Theoretical physicists still have trouble incorporating gravity in with the other three fundamental forces. If you ask me, it's work funding. We've discovered so much using particle accelerators. The brilliant shouldn't have to pay for the incompetence of the average.
Polterguist 1 year ago
@Polterguist These theories have zealots who can't drop them when the evidence isn't there. The temperature of the universe doesn't coincide with the big bang theory.They come up with "inflation." The galaxies move faster than mathematical calculations predicted. They invent "dark matter." Nobody has evidence for dark matter other than poor math. Nobody has aevidence for a big bang. Your "20 years..." blah blah is "foolish," a rationalization to avoid thinking for yourself.
brelfan 1 year ago
@brelfan They reconfigurate the theories if evidence to the contrary arises. Do you have a better idea for theoretical physics? Inflation is plausible to them. Moreover, there is evidence for dark matter due to the fact that the edges of galaxies aren't flying off into space. There's myriads of evidence for the big bang: Cosmic background radiation, the accelerating expansion of the universe, and much more than I can name. You're being a conceited moron. I don't think for myself? You
Polterguist 1 year ago
@brelfan crossed the line with that one. You're arguments aren't any better than those of a creationist. You're just a common person who thinks he can shoot down years upon years of scientific theories that he knows nothing about. Sounds like the epitome of religion. Back to the theories, they are based on what is currently confirmed. That's how theoretical physics work. They come up with theories to explain that which is yet to be explored.
Polterguist 1 year ago
Take that religion!
Where's your desert-dwelling god now?
rickballance 1 year ago
@rickballance your far too ignorant, what started the membranes then? please tell me id love to know! im not saying that there is a god but there might be, in my opinion the best religion is Islam because if interpruted correctly the Quran states string theory and states that there is more than one universe, a multiverse. Its people like you who make science seem ignorant and disowning, science hasnt ever said that there is no God, its just saying that M theory is probable.
fsxworldtourfilms 1 year ago
@fsxworldtourfilms