911 Amateur Part 3 *update*

[Weirdo10o4]

1. Yes. Resolution is insufficient to determine if said event (shearing off) happened.

2. Or is he down for a more stable shot?

3. ... during September 11th, 2001. Resolution, again.

4. The windshield is at an angle, which permits greater than 90 degrees observation, especially if your target is over 300 meters above.

5. No one in NYC saw it.

6. Crowd movement perhaps forced the cameraman to move.

[ALEXUNDERVIV777]

I wish we all (by "we" I mean people who wants to know the truth, like you and me) would gather together financially and build a part of a building that would be similar to trade center tower(not the whole building!!!) just a wall about 3 stories high then crash a used or decomisioned airplane (preferably same model) and compare. Maybe build not just a wall but the interior too, well you get the point..

[TexasRose50]

One thing I have been wondering today as I watch all these videos. With all the copters in the sky, and having to keep a careful eye on one another, as to not collide, I guess NO ONE saw the second plane coming??? BTW...great job Simon!!!

[kinkalofagus]

the problem I have with this video is that in an effort to prove tapes were doctor, your showing me just how easy it is to do it. If it is that easy maybe you doctored these shots.

[vayha79]

At 5.15. there is a picture of eye angle and object that can be noticed. Even if picture is correct - observer with camera is lower then eye on this picture. It means that if you are lover then mirror - the angle is wider - so u can see object wich is "behind" for example mirror or windshield.

[roxxphatcox]

@vayha79 It is plausible that the windshield could reflect the incident,

and the windshield reflection is affected by the camera movement.

The only way to know for sure is getting the angle degree on the windshield

and the cars exact location, we know where the plane hit and the angle of the

camera. This would be something for the author of this clip to look into. A laser pointer would do the job, but we all know that is impossible at the moment.

[vayha79]

reflection at this angle is possible I think. Ive checked it with little my moms mirror. the tric is you have to be lover than mirror, and on this shot - observer is lover than car glass - so it is correct.

[mooners40]

there is no way you would have enough time and just happen to be pointing a camera exactly there for that shot - how fast is it moving? There is nothing happening in that area before the impact for him to warrant shooting in that direction - is he clairvoyant? Live feed monitor shaped like a windshield ha?

[mainstreamminority]

The "windshield" is the live video feed monitor from his own camera feed. The guy who twice looked over his shoulder then "cut" did so because he had to get out of there and move quickly.

[NoahsBeard]

I do agree with that fact that i find it very hard to believe a plane flew into a building and nothing broke off before it went in and in all other video that i have seen as soon as the fuel tanks hit something hard (in this instance the WTC buikdings) it should of been a more instant explosion with more flames shooting out of the hole it created when it went in. Rather than the building absorbing it and it exploding almost a full second after the tanks hit the building

[NoahsBeard]

I do have to say i agree and disagree with some points you made here. As far as your reflective surface that was seen in the blast; that is not a windshield. if you look at it closer you see a point where the glass bends that can clearly be identified by the casing it is sitting in. The planes do look doctored flying in. But upon watching footage of the same video in other videos i see no evidence of missing wings ect.

[NJP695]

7:40, Its from the Blast of the engine, and the Suport Beams Breaking under the plane6:29, Thats the sound of The Flames, the people screaming Cars and wind onto the camera.2:34, Aluminum + Steel are in the plane's wings2:53, Maybe he whanted to get a video of the WTC Burning, so he got down low, and asked the man to stand there

3:47, Maybe he moved a truck with glass or something in to place so he can st the Burning in the reflection too.

4:49, Your not geting the whole picture of the object.

[NJP695]

And also, You problebly FORGED this, just to get people angry at you.

And lets say that you right, so what? This dose nothing, we still know that 2,102 people died, and now your Mocking all of thous who died on that day, and mocking the people who found this fotige and Framing them for no reason! Fucker

[gee100]

in the tina cart video, why is so upset? not because of the bands, but because they can see a 'square cloud of smoke coming from the explosion from the entry. look at 9:47 where the 'plane' goes in and watch the 'fireball' go square.. interesting..

[roqone]

Fool who?

nice post friend

[NINEELEVENNEWS]

They used TV Fakery to fool the World..