I don't buy any of this crap. You've got retired Military, Govt., Pilots, even our own Astronauts ratting out the Military Industrial Complex left and right. I know they've got bases on the Moon. You can see all kinds of stuff on the Moon in those older poorly covered up photos. So now they're back-tracking to fix them. Just compare the old ones to the ones, everything just magically disappears. If it was up to me I'd pull all of NASA's funding and throw their ass in the dumpster.
this .....and yet we are still living in the age of religion. ....the rise of the machine is upon us....the technological singularity we be here with in one human generation.
Can't wait to witness the years to come in the late 2030's and 40's
We humans will either survive the singularity, or...we will not.
hehehe ... I like to think about comments like these, how they'll be perceived 100 years from now. Kind of like how we view the "flying cars" we're all supposed to be all driving in our modern-day utopia today.
No offense, but nobody knows the future. If anyone has a religion it's those who think they know the future, whatever they think it will be. Gee whiz ... even I'm religious but I'm not so bold. I do agree though that it will be of our making; So let's pull together. Not apart.
You mean like if it doesn't work? These satellites ALREADY completed their mission ... this is like a bonus round NASA just dreamed up! It costs no extra money ... it's a complete freebie. All the math is already done. Coordinates programmed in. It's the kind of thing that makes you want to say ... "wow, those NASA guys are awesome". They've been wronged in the past, past errors caused by 3rd party vendors via a shoestring budget.
How long before the NASA report comes out that Americans driving SUVs are causing Anthropogenic Global Warming...er, ah....Global Climate Disruption....which must be stopped with a new tax and cap legislation, as detected by the ARTEMIS program?
NASA - wasting money we don't have on programs we don't need about science we can't control.
Well under 0.5% of our budget goes to NASA .. the cost of the technology that comes from it (example: the MOS transistor, building-block of all computers was developed by the space program).
NASA isn't just space either ...remember when communism died? Thank the rockets developed mainly via NASA tech. Today's UAVs that do most of the fighting the war against terror? Thank NASA tech again (McDonnelDouglas Space division to be exact which does the remote controls for satellites).
Today's UAVs that do most of the fighting the war against terror? should read "do most of the bombing of the fighting the war against terror.
Everyone uses technology that got it's initial development from NASA funding ... space requirements demand the very most extreme properties whose development never possible without the budget NASA is allowed to spend on it. It would blow your mind if you really knew how much NASA has improved your everyday life.
Hate to burst your NASA bubble but from Wikipedia:
"In 1959, Dawon Kahng and Martin M. (John) Atalla at Bell Labs invented the metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET)." "The basic principle of the device was first proposed by Julius Edgar Lilienfeld in 1925."
How long before "they" turn the UAVs onto "us" along with their wonderful RF energy crowd control weapons? Every time we take sergeants out of the loop, we're that much closer to Orwell's fantasies.
Like I said ... it's good to be wary ... but know what you're nixing before you give it the axe. In my experience few if any NASA haters take the time to honestly and thoroughly study the issue from both sides. While I'm a big support of NASA, you might be surprised to learn I'm also borderline libertarian. NASA does far less per $ invested that invades your privacy compared to most Gov't programs. It's the satellite corp's using russian rockets that worry me far more than NASA.
Also FYI ... Bell Labs did this work with funding provided by both the space program and the Defense Dept so they could shrink transistors from tubes down to something smaller, faster, and lower power. Also there's still some debate who gets the credit ... many give it to National Semiconductor who also were funded for the project for the same reason. Wonder why the US is rich? Technological superiority ... thanks in part to NASA developments unfundable in any other way.
No, you're exactly right that anything funded by the gov't should be suspect. I do NOT deny that. I do not however think it's a bit extreme to dismiss anything funded by the gov't out of hand, when we have the right to demand transparency - and regarding NASA funding transparency is there. We know exactly what is being built, how it can be used, etc. etc. Knowledge is your friend, w4csc, not the enemy. But, yes, tis good to be wary. I am.
@onefugowie All speed is measured relative to something. So what do you want the earth's speed measured against? You said in it's orbit so I would assume you mean either around the sun or possibly around the center of the galaxy.
@onefugowie "what speed is the Earth traveling at in its orbit??"
Relative to what..sun?...galaxy center?...other planets?...origin of the Universe?
Speed implies a body in relation to a reference point, usually Earth. If that's the reference, the answer is zero...(c;] Spiraling around our star on its way to Vega, it makes a corkscrew around 66,000 mph I remember a science teacher telling me in high school....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yeah whatever..the only thing nasa is interested in is how to put more missile platforms or spy satellites in space. Politically wretched,scandal plagued, climate data fraud,bankers bitch organization and to boot their lying sacks of shit
nice!
Ta3iapxHs 7 months ago
I don't buy any of this crap. You've got retired Military, Govt., Pilots, even our own Astronauts ratting out the Military Industrial Complex left and right. I know they've got bases on the Moon. You can see all kinds of stuff on the Moon in those older poorly covered up photos. So now they're back-tracking to fix them. Just compare the old ones to the ones, everything just magically disappears. If it was up to me I'd pull all of NASA's funding and throw their ass in the dumpster.
HemiHead66 1 year ago
i have no idea what this means. stop tlkn in foreign language. i just needed help in dead space 2
metal220 1 year ago
si deberian subtitularlo...
TheYuliita 1 year ago
Deberian susbtitularlo al Español.
Gracias
claudiobaiocchi1 1 year ago
What an annoying voice-over.
sdfdfg6t66 1 year ago
Twenty-eleven
eastportland 1 year ago
Thankyou NASA for not being mediocre!
acs1978aus 1 year ago
this .....and yet we are still living in the age of religion. ....the rise of the machine is upon us....the technological singularity we be here with in one human generation.
Can't wait to witness the years to come in the late 2030's and 40's
We humans will either survive the singularity, or...we will not.
Either way, it will be of our own making.
AH2BFREE 1 year ago
hehehe ... I like to think about comments like these, how they'll be perceived 100 years from now. Kind of like how we view the "flying cars" we're all supposed to be all driving in our modern-day utopia today.
No offense, but nobody knows the future. If anyone has a religion it's those who think they know the future, whatever they think it will be. Gee whiz ... even I'm religious but I'm not so bold. I do agree though that it will be of our making; So let's pull together. Not apart.
davea0511 1 year ago
What if soemthing goes wrong?
:(
Jouwl 1 year ago
@Jouwl
"What if something goes wrong? :( "
You mean like if it doesn't work? These satellites ALREADY completed their mission ... this is like a bonus round NASA just dreamed up! It costs no extra money ... it's a complete freebie. All the math is already done. Coordinates programmed in. It's the kind of thing that makes you want to say ... "wow, those NASA guys are awesome". They've been wronged in the past, past errors caused by 3rd party vendors via a shoestring budget.
LETS FUND NASA!
davea0511 1 year ago
@davea0511
I was trying to be funny, actually. But hey that's interesting information.
Jouwl 1 year ago
How long before the NASA report comes out that Americans driving SUVs are causing Anthropogenic Global Warming...er, ah....Global Climate Disruption....which must be stopped with a new tax and cap legislation, as detected by the ARTEMIS program?
NASA - wasting money we don't have on programs we don't need about science we can't control.
w4csc 1 year ago
@w4csc
Well under 0.5% of our budget goes to NASA .. the cost of the technology that comes from it (example: the MOS transistor, building-block of all computers was developed by the space program).
NASA isn't just space either ...remember when communism died? Thank the rockets developed mainly via NASA tech. Today's UAVs that do most of the fighting the war against terror? Thank NASA tech again (McDonnelDouglas Space division to be exact which does the remote controls for satellites).
davea0511 1 year ago
correction to my comment:
Today's UAVs that do most of the fighting the war against terror? should read "do most of the bombing of the fighting the war against terror.
Everyone uses technology that got it's initial development from NASA funding ... space requirements demand the very most extreme properties whose development never possible without the budget NASA is allowed to spend on it. It would blow your mind if you really knew how much NASA has improved your everyday life.
davea0511 1 year ago
@davea0511
Hate to burst your NASA bubble but from Wikipedia:
"In 1959, Dawon Kahng and Martin M. (John) Atalla at Bell Labs invented the metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET)." "The basic principle of the device was first proposed by Julius Edgar Lilienfeld in 1925."
How long before "they" turn the UAVs onto "us" along with their wonderful RF energy crowd control weapons? Every time we take sergeants out of the loop, we're that much closer to Orwell's fantasies.
w4csc 1 year ago
@w4csc
Like I said ... it's good to be wary ... but know what you're nixing before you give it the axe. In my experience few if any NASA haters take the time to honestly and thoroughly study the issue from both sides. While I'm a big support of NASA, you might be surprised to learn I'm also borderline libertarian. NASA does far less per $ invested that invades your privacy compared to most Gov't programs. It's the satellite corp's using russian rockets that worry me far more than NASA.
davea0511 1 year ago
@w4csc
Also FYI ... Bell Labs did this work with funding provided by both the space program and the Defense Dept so they could shrink transistors from tubes down to something smaller, faster, and lower power. Also there's still some debate who gets the credit ... many give it to National Semiconductor who also were funded for the project for the same reason. Wonder why the US is rich? Technological superiority ... thanks in part to NASA developments unfundable in any other way.
davea0511 1 year ago
@w4csc
No, you're exactly right that anything funded by the gov't should be suspect. I do NOT deny that. I do not however think it's a bit extreme to dismiss anything funded by the gov't out of hand, when we have the right to demand transparency - and regarding NASA funding transparency is there. We know exactly what is being built, how it can be used, etc. etc. Knowledge is your friend, w4csc, not the enemy. But, yes, tis good to be wary. I am.
davea0511 1 year ago
who knows this....what speed is the Earth traveling at in its orbit??
onefugowie 1 year ago
@onefugowie All speed is measured relative to something. So what do you want the earth's speed measured against? You said in it's orbit so I would assume you mean either around the sun or possibly around the center of the galaxy.
66stang347 1 year ago
@66stang347 i found it..Earth travels at 67,062 miles a hour around the galaxy..
onefugowie 1 year ago
@onefugowie "what speed is the Earth traveling at in its orbit??"
Relative to what..sun?...galaxy center?...other planets?...origin of the Universe?
Speed implies a body in relation to a reference point, usually Earth. If that's the reference, the answer is zero...(c;] Spiraling around our star on its way to Vega, it makes a corkscrew around 66,000 mph I remember a science teacher telling me in high school....
w4csc 1 year ago
@w4csc your right i found its traveling at 67,062.00 MPH ...
in its travel across the universe towards Vega
onefugowie 1 year ago
way to make us look like retards, but a 10 year old narator thinking she got mad knowledge
DaR3b3L 1 year ago
nice+
erlingurt 1 year ago
Simply STUNNING.
More beautifully choreographed than any ballet. A fabulous example of shit working.
SCIENCE FTW.
martiangrundy 1 year ago
The right stuff.
roguemale57 1 year ago
THIS IS MODERN DAY BLACK MAGIC!!!
ComancheChiefSD 1 year ago
WHAT KIND OF EVIL STUFF IS THIS??? WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY DOING???
ComancheChiefSD 1 year ago
Man, the college interns keep getting younger and younger. The narrator sounds like she can't be a day over 14.
rocketplumber 1 year ago 3
Kudos to whoever calculated the maneuvers. If it was a computer algorithm, kudos to whoever made the algorithm.
ReasonSharp 1 year ago 2
How did Apollo land a man on the moon without this knowledge NASA?
Peace to you
awe130 1 year ago
Great orbital stunt! L1 to L2 transfer orbit must be a first?
rodovre 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah whatever..the only thing nasa is interested in is how to put more missile platforms or spy satellites in space. Politically wretched,scandal plagued, climate data fraud,bankers bitch organization and to boot their lying sacks of shit
ostormbringero 1 year ago
@ostormbringero
AGREE 100%
THEY ARE EVIL SATANISTS
ComancheChiefSD 1 year ago
Amazing. I don't think I can even begin to comprehend how complicated this must be, but I am in awe of it!
T800System 1 year ago 2
..my sister is out again..at night..again..said apollo:).
moonsalam 1 year ago
shame the name of NASA is hooked up with global warming idiots like hansen
THIS is clever shit
eyfatboy 1 year ago
Does NASA do orbital mechanics or what?!!!
mauest941 1 year ago
Line from "Armageddon" "You're NASA for *cry sake*, you're the guys that think this *stuff* up..."
Pentaquark 1 year ago
I'd probe her satellite if you know what I mean...
locomotive147 1 year ago
the satelites are aligned on my birthday,the 14th of November
CounterNerd 1 year ago
it must've been so hard to compute all those paths to get to the moon, especially when aiming to conserve fuel. I wanna be able to do that too :D
handplanty 1 year ago 3
cool
tostrong4you 1 year ago
I love how the spacecrafts travel, so much precision involved.
Mattey10101 1 year ago 2
sounds like a 10 year old....cool...
high8us 1 year ago 13
@high8us Would you do her?
demonslayer55555585 1 year ago
@demonslayer55555585
Would YOU do her?
CounterNerd 1 year ago
@CounterNerd HEHEHE!
demonslayer55555585 1 year ago
Very interesting thanks for post ! Xclnt CG
djscotty1111 1 year ago 3
nice 3d, it must be lot of work, very good work :)
shaddar666 1 year ago 2
SCIENCE FTW!!
NATEandtheMONKEY 1 year ago
..welcome:)).
moonsalam 1 year ago
Science rules
uzimachi1 1 year ago 20
@uzimachi1 I totally agree!
IngoGallacher 1 year ago
Terrific video for demonstrating orbital mechanics and the solar wind! Thanks!
UnTiedMusicStudio 1 year ago 3