these women make such a big deal about the strength and intelligence of women and yet they are the worst examples available, get some actually funny and intelligent women on instead of these fuckwits
Why didn't you let them have it Ricky, I can't stand these dumb bitches. No women on his show they say, how many blokes are on The View panel, they really are the dumbest people on TV.
Ricky has better things to do than explain jokes he made at an awards ceremony to these squawking chickens. He's a comedian, aka a person who makes jokes at the expense of others! He won't care if your feelings are hurt; if anything that makes it funnier.
do those retards not know what sexism is?! where is the prejudice in saying they need airbrushing? call it insulting if you want but there no way in hell that's sexist.
fucking feminist nazis. they've been brain washed so much that they think every joke with a woman in it has to be sexist. what they need is a fat dick launched into their asses
@flake452 No, not all Americans are this stupid. but unfortunately, too many of our citizens turn to the bible instead of actual books. Most Americans are uneducated half-wits whose IQ is about half of their gradually decreasing life expectancy.
I really don't understand what was either racist/sexist about his jokes. I am a woman and I didn't find anything discriminatory about the joke, if anything it was highlighting the insane hollywood need to perptuate a misguided notion of perfection. We complain about airbrushing and what its doing to our young women and when a comedian points it out we get all defensive like its a taboo subject. As a woman, I found the joke to be funny and more importantly it was true, its not like he made it up
As a woman, a HUGE Gervais fan and an American I can honestly tell you that even BEFORE he explained his reasoning behind the joke about the airbrushing, I thought it was hilarious. I am of the mind that if you cannot learn to laugh at yourself you have no right to laugh AT someone else. There are plenty of sexest jokes about women that I find hilarious, others I don't even find funny, not becuse I find them offensive, but simply because I don't find it funny. Humor, like life, is subjective.
I love how Elizabeth wanted to start shit by implying Ricky was being sexist for not having a woman on Talking Funny when she's part of a show that has only women on the panel. The diversity plea is stupid. So you put on a woman, but next they'll bitch about why they're only straight comedians on there. So they bring it a gay comedian but then complain there are no muslims, etc. Stop making everything into a stupid conspiracy.
Haha I love how the blonde bimbo gets OWNED by Ricky when she says "No female comedians there?" Haha. He's so intelligent. He's brilliant, well done owning this henhouse Rick.
@CheddarBob39 Who cares mate, they're all c*nts. Maybe except for Whoopi, it looks like she may be the only one who actually has SOME sense of humour.
As soon as Rick called her up on the sexist comment she stuttered her words and panicked, she clearly though she was going to throw that in the air and thought he would let it go. What a fucking idiot, as soon as he explained the obvious she started sucking up to him.. Fuck scum..
the view= a group of old hags who enjoy yelling over eachother. shut up and stop overanalysing everything, its humour not a fucking prescribed english text.
God, these woman just can't keep up with his humor. Why are they over analyzing his comments so much? This panel is terrible. He must sound like he's speaking German to Barbara Walters. She doesn't react to any of his jokes.
The comment about Ricky saying the girls were all airbrushed was sexist pissed me off so much. It's this politically correct world where as soon as you mention a woman in a joke it must be sexist. Don't know why these idiots are being paid so much money to sit in a chair and talk about this rubbish.
@MrRlgreaves I mentiond this to my mum and even she said there idiots. My girl friend when she herd the joke laughed so much and when i showed her this video she said she didnt even have one thought about being sexiest. These poeple on this show need to listen and watch before they start talking about something.
Funny how they can rub him all over when he sits down and that is fine. If any man ever touched a woman like they basically rubbed Ricky would probably be jailed. But hey, no men on the panel and Ricky is definitely the sexist one
I think they addressed the issues that they were unsure about and they gave him the benefit of the doubt and accepted his explanations when he gave them. They did not seem especially ignorant or defensive. Barbara was a bit severe. The rest of the girls seemed to go out of their way to excuse him once he'd satisfied their concerns. Even the "no women on the panel" comment was balanced by one of them admitting, "that's a bit hypercritical coming from a panel of women without any men..." Cheer up.
She wouldn't have replaced any of the comedians on the show, she would have added more, you see, anything to horn in on something men excel at, she is not concerned with the best comedians being on the show, only that there is a woman, or women on it.
Absolutely pathetic.
The irony of Gervais being asked why it was only men on his show by a woman on a show that only has female hosts, it is utterly astounding.
"SEXIST!" is the first thing they think of when they hear a joke about women, which is part of the reason women never get ridiculed in TV shows and adverts, because women's groups would attack them and label them misogynist.
omg this was AMAZING HAHAHAHAHAHA! the only thing that would of been greater than this was if Dilkington was there being interviewed. Joy was the only one there who 'got' Ricky and actually conducted some sort of interview . man the view is my guilty pleasure... this was almost as good as spotting an old man eating a twix.
How is the sex and the city joke sexist? I could see how someone might consider it ageist or anti-celebrity. They're just looking for any excuse to make something sexist.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or a cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
i actually haven't got the balls to press play. i fucking hate stuff that makes me cringe, just like this fucking show. aaargh i couldn't sit through all of Borat i was so weirded out!! the film itself is funny as hell but damn, cringe comedy is the hardest to watch!! I'm actually gonna press play now, and hopefully i'm not dead after 10 minutes of excruciating pain.
@TheDJIdris Your opinion is the 1 nobody cares about you little homunculus. Peel off your own facial skin & wrap it around your skinny winkie 2 make it thicker then get back into your usual routine of sitting on vegetables. I hope somebody grinds pepper on U in the underground during rush hour & everyone in the carriage sneezes all over you. Your reposte is so boring i fell asleep for 2minutes while driving on the way to your mums house for her monthly gangbang. i bet you can suck your own penis
these women make such a big deal about the strength and intelligence of women and yet they are the worst examples available, get some actually funny and intelligent women on instead of these fuckwits
Mrtoomzy 2 days ago
4:24 - literally WTF. Love the stare Ricky gives her
elnocho3 4 days ago 2
Poor Ricky. Being threatened pre-show by that horribel Barbara Walters. :)
Screenplaya 1 week ago
Why is there no women on your show? why is there no men on yours ?
Reece123414 1 week ago 3
@Reece123414 exactly... just dumb hypocritical women
garett91 1 week ago 2
@garett91 all those types of people do is try to find something negative, then complain about the most stupid of things.
Reece123414 1 week ago
english humour takes the piss out of america, so embarrassing, they can't even understand the jokes, idiot's.
P0TT5Y147 1 week ago
HAHA rickys face at 4:31
AverageAdam47 1 week ago
MY EARS. MY POOR EARS.
Jamesjustwasnthere 2 weeks ago
I would love to see Karl come on this show.
Marasma101 2 weeks ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
this is why American women shouldn't be aloud to Talk !!!!
Im joking, Joking xD
IrishHooligan86 2 weeks ago
this is why American women shouldn't be aloud to Talk !!!!
Im joking, Joking xD
IrishHooligan86 2 weeks ago
would smash the back doors off that blonde all day!
zeberdee123 3 weeks ago
@zeberdee123 Yeah the one on the left of Ricky is smokin!
JoshuaSpades 3 weeks ago
barbara walters has reached the age where you stop understanding sarcasm
009SoundVEVO 3 weeks ago
Why didn't you let them have it Ricky, I can't stand these dumb bitches. No women on his show they say, how many blokes are on The View panel, they really are the dumbest people on TV.
PCRKing 3 weeks ago
Ricky has better things to do than explain jokes he made at an awards ceremony to these squawking chickens. He's a comedian, aka a person who makes jokes at the expense of others! He won't care if your feelings are hurt; if anything that makes it funnier.
ThePhantom135 3 weeks ago
"I take everything you say seriously". You're pretty fucking stupid then, considering you're speaking to a comedian.
CymroGoch 3 weeks ago
Is it just me or is their line of questioning REALLY hostile?????
CitzenVain714 3 weeks ago
The Hasselbeck one wants to have sex with him.
CISElite 3 weeks ago
Barbara Walters has no sense of humour / sense of anything.
notnek12 3 weeks ago
The View needs to End...it was a pretty bad interview. Jus let Ricky talk! lol
soundbombin23 4 weeks ago
Trashiest show in TV history..
EpipLP0723 4 weeks ago
"Bit sexist"
do those retards not know what sexism is?! where is the prejudice in saying they need airbrushing? call it insulting if you want but there no way in hell that's sexist.
benjaspc123 1 month ago
Omg I hate all these women so much, but I love you so much gervais... Do I thumbs up for love? Or thumbs down for hate?
pardingo 1 month ago
why the fuck do these women have this show? bunch of cackling cunts is all i see.
mQtek 1 month ago
how do they all speak at the same time and not go crazy?
Erdos2n 1 month ago 2
She's just beyond able taking a joke
1586brittc 1 month ago
BARBARA WALTERS IS STUPID AS CRAP
1586brittc 1 month ago
...........
TheSolidJake 1 month ago
lol the blond girl how come there are no female comedians on the show, why the hell aren't there any men on your show.
sparkle7979 1 month ago
This show makes me ashamed to be a woman.
tbatt247 1 month ago 10
they are too many woman on this show! I don't like it.Two or there will be enough it's too noisy too.
SuperRenata23 1 month ago
BOK BOK BOK BOK BOK
GrizCC 1 month ago
Oh my word.... The only one of those women that gives us females a good name is Whoopie!
jenalicerose 1 month ago 3
4 male comedians = sexism? idiot
hcvicka 1 month ago 8
@hcvicka And they host a show with 5 women, by their logic that's sexist too.. :p
Kekkon3n 1 month ago
@Kekkon3n lol Great point
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
Of course women can be funny, but most of them just aren't.
It's the same with female serial killers. They are very rare!
nairolfmackebrecht 1 month ago
Ricky is far too witty for these women!
TheStig000 1 month ago 3
Have we reduced feminism to a bunch of stupid women misunderstanding jokes and gossiping on a couch?
JustinFriesen 1 month ago
9:13 lol, out of context this is funny.
jtburney 1 month ago
if anything the golden globe preformance made me start to watch him more lol
LaurenNZ81 1 month ago 2
the two women on the left are cunts.
fdbngkasjfbgi 1 month ago 3
Aye and - Why's Whoopi on there? You can't put decent folks on hosting job for dumb shows like this.
louMacNtire 1 month ago
Didn't that black girl use to be tight?
louMacNtire 1 month ago
fucking feminist nazis. they've been brain washed so much that they think every joke with a woman in it has to be sexist. what they need is a fat dick launched into their asses
fkbitchesgetpickles 1 month ago 6
Ricky handled that really well.
swedenstu 1 month ago 5
the look he gives her at 4:30 is priceless
joeyjoeyjoeyjoey101 1 month ago 2
@joeyjoeyjoeyjoey101 Yeah, the "stupid fucking bitch" look :D
Cody111079 1 month ago
"ahah can we touch you?! ahahah" seconds later, WHY ARE YOU SEXIST.
joeyjoeyjoeyjoey101 1 month ago 9
You can just see on his face he's thinking "shut the fuck up old cunt" whens he's looking at Babara
Dez13040287 2 months ago
Want to here a joke? The view.
Dez13040287 2 months ago
If people misinterpret a joke and get offended....Well back fucking luck you dumb cunt. Brighten up or fuck off.
mo0nbuggy 2 months ago
The worst panel ever assembled.
brewser06 2 months ago
Why is Whoopi Golgberg even on there?
RomanoJonker 2 months ago
Barbra Walters is a Dumb Cunt
nomad442nomad 2 months ago 2
Annoying. Why should they need five? Five stupid people who talk all at once?
disam73 2 months ago
This show is... so... Annoyin
disam73 2 months ago 3
Ricky you rule...
marqann 2 months ago
luis bunuel is the one who coined' thank god i am an atheist!'
MrBandera1968 2 months ago
barbara can't understand irony
achaserofrocks 2 months ago
How clueless is Barbara Walters - she must be boring as batsh!t in real life!
teflon29 2 months ago 2
seriously the old bird is a cunt
MarkLosingWeight 2 months ago 6
Are all americans so stupid?
flake452 2 months ago 50
@flake452 yep
mQtek 1 month ago
@flake452 No, not all Americans are this stupid. but unfortunately, too many of our citizens turn to the bible instead of actual books. Most Americans are uneducated half-wits whose IQ is about half of their gradually decreasing life expectancy.
Bowenarro111 2 weeks ago
I really don't understand what was either racist/sexist about his jokes. I am a woman and I didn't find anything discriminatory about the joke, if anything it was highlighting the insane hollywood need to perptuate a misguided notion of perfection. We complain about airbrushing and what its doing to our young women and when a comedian points it out we get all defensive like its a taboo subject. As a woman, I found the joke to be funny and more importantly it was true, its not like he made it up
XsweetstarliteX 2 months ago 5
these women are retarded....
spider457 2 months ago 8
I love that he bullshits his way out of everything, you gotta love Ricky.
LittleMiss2000 2 months ago
'what has god got to do with that?'
with being an atheist?
Irony doesn't exist in America?
THEDRUMMERJOSH 2 months ago 57
@THEDRUMMERJOSH I can't speak for all Americans but I love Ricky Gervais :)
laurenbiv 2 months ago
@THEDRUMMERJOSH Please don't judge us on The View.
laurenbiv 2 months ago
As a woman, a HUGE Gervais fan and an American I can honestly tell you that even BEFORE he explained his reasoning behind the joke about the airbrushing, I thought it was hilarious. I am of the mind that if you cannot learn to laugh at yourself you have no right to laugh AT someone else. There are plenty of sexest jokes about women that I find hilarious, others I don't even find funny, not becuse I find them offensive, but simply because I don't find it funny. Humor, like life, is subjective.
KateMottenTot 2 months ago
Stupid American Trash Whores! Ricky must have hated beeing surrounded by these retards.
edwardzimmerman 2 months ago
what shite tv is this! Ricky is immense, respect his joke at the time and move on!!!!
caairney16 2 months ago
Gawd these bitches are stupid.
Jospehporta 2 months ago
i agree with jerry i havent met/seen i womam i think is funny
xXDuckfrogXx 2 months ago
@xXDuckfrogXx elen degeneres?
i think its a love for females? :P
THEDRUMMERJOSH 2 months ago
They obviously brought him on to attack him like a pack of wolves, but this motherfucker owned them all.
VENIVIDIVICl 2 months ago
3:41 yoda?
5tivi 2 months ago
Seriously once you get them started they wont shut up.
GTamavicius 3 months ago
Walters is a stiff bitch get over yourself!
MsSparky4 3 months ago
I love how Elizabeth wanted to start shit by implying Ricky was being sexist for not having a woman on Talking Funny when she's part of a show that has only women on the panel. The diversity plea is stupid. So you put on a woman, but next they'll bitch about why they're only straight comedians on there. So they bring it a gay comedian but then complain there are no muslims, etc. Stop making everything into a stupid conspiracy.
poolerboy0077 3 months ago
Haha I love how the blonde bimbo gets OWNED by Ricky when she says "No female comedians there?" Haha. He's so intelligent. He's brilliant, well done owning this henhouse Rick.
thranduillion 3 months ago
@thranduillion
BUT she is the only good looking one on the panel. ( :
CheddarBob39 3 months ago
@CheddarBob39 Who cares mate, they're all c*nts. Maybe except for Whoopi, it looks like she may be the only one who actually has SOME sense of humour.
thranduillion 3 months ago
As soon as Rick called her up on the sexist comment she stuttered her words and panicked, she clearly though she was going to throw that in the air and thought he would let it go. What a fucking idiot, as soon as he explained the obvious she started sucking up to him.. Fuck scum..
JordanWells15 3 months ago
Sexist? What the hell are these idiots on about! Obviously dont have a clue what the word means!
Iain1983 3 months ago
Comment removed
Maggiieeee95 3 months ago
the view= a group of old hags who enjoy yelling over eachother. shut up and stop overanalysing everything, its humour not a fucking prescribed english text.
Maggiieeee95 3 months ago
they actually dont understand his humor at ALL ...pathetic
roxyurworld 3 months ago
@roxyurworld They're American, you really have to spell it out, they're too stupid.
Jospehporta 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
these women are so STUPID
roxyurworld 3 months ago
"if you have to explain the jokes you didn't tell it well"???
WTF, or maybe you are thick as pig shit!
TheDharmawheel 3 months ago 3
reasonable intelligent women please come out of the woodwork and replace this show
paulwritesfights 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ricky is just smarter than all of them, that's why he dosent care
ozzydoop1 3 months ago
God, these woman just can't keep up with his humor. Why are they over analyzing his comments so much? This panel is terrible. He must sound like he's speaking German to Barbara Walters. She doesn't react to any of his jokes.
imurph22 3 months ago 5
quit analyzing his humor...annoying...
hfleshman 3 months ago
A coven of Bitches!!!
TheSnuffler 3 months ago
The old woman? WTF!
markmywords312 3 months ago
BITCHES
CumInAsses 3 months ago 67
@CumInAsses :)
WHORES
DeadJesus100 1 month ago
wow thats so sad, Gervais has to explain everytime he makes a joke, that it is in fact a joke
burnsidebluntslide 3 months ago
Fucking hell Barbara lighten up
5eurocups2005 3 months ago 2
the black woman makes me want to slit my wrists
karoolta 3 months ago
not whoppi goldberg btw, though shes fucking annoying as well
karoolta 3 months ago
The comment about Ricky saying the girls were all airbrushed was sexist pissed me off so much. It's this politically correct world where as soon as you mention a woman in a joke it must be sexist. Don't know why these idiots are being paid so much money to sit in a chair and talk about this rubbish.
MrRlgreaves 3 months ago 66
@MrRlgreaves I was just about to say the same thing. The exact same comment could have been made about men.
induna7 3 months ago
Comment removed
Qoppa1 3 months ago
@MrRlgreaves I agree I am a woman and I don't think what he said was sexist at all... assholes.
ro143cky 3 months ago
@MrRlgreaves I mentiond this to my mum and even she said there idiots. My girl friend when she herd the joke laughed so much and when i showed her this video she said she didnt even have one thought about being sexiest. These poeple on this show need to listen and watch before they start talking about something.
colemartinst123 1 month ago
Dat look at 4:31 haha
Apan07 3 months ago 2
ricky looked genuinely pissed and i can't blame him, i thought loose women was bad this is just dumb
TKManUTD1989 3 months ago
god feminists piss me off
provenelk 4 months ago 2
my god these women are so dumb. I don't know who any of them are apart from Whoopie Goldberg. Who's the old one in the white jacket?
ianwilson2007 4 months ago
@ianwilson2007 haha, barbara walters?
chisan918 3 months ago
Watching these twittering females trying to belittle a man makes me feel ashamed to be a woman.
He's a COMEDIAN....... (and a very funny one too).
GingerRogers 4 months ago
That Seinfield cunt must be one of the most hideous men in the world.
ChainsawVsGod 4 months ago
STUPID FUCKING BITCHES, WHAT A JOKE, SHUT THE FUCK UP PLEASE
mudguts24 4 months ago
Is it just an act or are those women seriously that stupid?
ReclusiveDuck 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
omg! these women have absolutely no sense of humour.
THEDOLPHINDREAMS 4 months ago
those bitches are so fucking annoying
93johnk 4 months ago
How did Ricky put up with this shit without walking off or something?!
drbumhoops 4 months ago
Whoopie is a bitch...good on you Ricky for shutting her down
TheBenjamin0001 4 months ago
Awkward, painful, brilliant.
cmbguy11 4 months ago
man he killed those bitches
noldorian86 4 months ago
Funny how they can rub him all over when he sits down and that is fine. If any man ever touched a woman like they basically rubbed Ricky would probably be jailed. But hey, no men on the panel and Ricky is definitely the sexist one
TaylorDylan100 4 months ago
dumb cunts
big1gangsta2clink 4 months ago
I think they addressed the issues that they were unsure about and they gave him the benefit of the doubt and accepted his explanations when he gave them. They did not seem especially ignorant or defensive. Barbara was a bit severe. The rest of the girls seemed to go out of their way to excuse him once he'd satisfied their concerns. Even the "no women on the panel" comment was balanced by one of them admitting, "that's a bit hypercritical coming from a panel of women without any men..." Cheer up.
MJRNKR 4 months ago
She wouldn't have replaced any of the comedians on the show, she would have added more, you see, anything to horn in on something men excel at, she is not concerned with the best comedians being on the show, only that there is a woman, or women on it.
Absolutely pathetic.
The irony of Gervais being asked why it was only men on his show by a woman on a show that only has female hosts, it is utterly astounding.
6oodfella 4 months ago
"SEXIST!" is the first thing they think of when they hear a joke about women, which is part of the reason women never get ridiculed in TV shows and adverts, because women's groups would attack them and label them misogynist.
How pitiful it makes women look.
6oodfella 4 months ago
omg this was AMAZING HAHAHAHAHAHA! the only thing that would of been greater than this was if Dilkington was there being interviewed. Joy was the only one there who 'got' Ricky and actually conducted some sort of interview . man the view is my guilty pleasure... this was almost as good as spotting an old man eating a twix.
foxpawz 4 months ago
How is the sex and the city joke sexist? I could see how someone might consider it ageist or anti-celebrity. They're just looking for any excuse to make something sexist.
vewsong 4 months ago
Who is the old cunt on Ricky's right? They should get rid of them all, except Whoopi.
dancingthroughsunday 4 months ago
These women are dumb as fuck
fatcatsarefun 4 months ago
@TheDJIdris
I am secretly in love with you and have a fascination with your penis
TheOmedome 4 months ago
the blonde sexy lady ....sha ting....
Adammski30 4 months ago
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe works don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 4 months ago
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or a cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
oh wow, Ricky steamrolled his way through that shit!!
jaylias 4 months ago 3
i actually haven't got the balls to press play. i fucking hate stuff that makes me cringe, just like this fucking show. aaargh i couldn't sit through all of Borat i was so weirded out!! the film itself is funny as hell but damn, cringe comedy is the hardest to watch!! I'm actually gonna press play now, and hopefully i'm not dead after 10 minutes of excruciating pain.
jaylias 4 months ago 2
these ladies tried to make him out to be a sexist and a racist Lmfao
asakidesigns 4 months ago
The youngest lady was seriously staring at Ricky... Lol
evolism 4 months ago
JERRY SEINFELD IS NOT FUNNY, WHEN ARE PEOPLE GOING TO REALISE THIS?
TheOmedome 4 months ago
@TheOmedome When they lose a sense of humor and start caring about your opinion. Just hold your breath. It should be coming anytime now.
TheDJIdris 4 months ago
Comment removed
TheOmedome 4 months ago
Comment removed
TheOmedome 4 months ago
Comment removed
TheOmedome 4 months ago
@TheDJIdris Your opinion is the 1 nobody cares about you little homunculus. Peel off your own facial skin & wrap it around your skinny winkie 2 make it thicker then get back into your usual routine of sitting on vegetables. I hope somebody grinds pepper on U in the underground during rush hour & everyone in the carriage sneezes all over you. Your reposte is so boring i fell asleep for 2minutes while driving on the way to your mums house for her monthly gangbang. i bet you can suck your own penis
TheOmedome 4 months ago