Cinebench : 4x Intel Xeon 7500 Processors | 32 cores

[triseebee]

jesus



[RUdiq1332]

power meter Faster

[aabbccxxyyandzz]

o.o

[Mangoolman1]

WTF I WANT ONE!!!

[SapphireHD5850Xtreme]

Can you Test LinX 0.6.4 on it? /watch?v=xa5aHGZnGC0

[SapphireHD5850Xtreme]

/watch?NR=1&v=wEVLDWkJPUY <-- This AMD got "22.26"

[iceto0o0o]

@SapphireHD5850Xtreme AMD - 48 cores vs Intel - 32 Cores ... think about it?

[SapphireHD5850Xtreme]

@iceto0o0o i think only 32Threads are used, look @ the Taskmanager on this Vid.

[iceto0o0o]

@SapphireHD5850Xtreme the thread is not a core of the CPU, this is something like virtual core, isn't it?

[shefotheking1]

how is that even possible , what MOBO is that ?

[pacorocks1]

the mac fg's are going tp be mad about this rofl

[venom800]

@pacorocks1 haha just saw a Mac pro 12 core beat this easily, its not all about cores, Macs run much more efficient. here play them at the same time

[kweechy]

@venom800 You couldn't be more wrong here. Mac does nothing differently from Windows or Linux, especially considering they all use the same hardware now.

The reason the "Mac" beat this (any dual 6 core Xeon works) is that CB11.5 doesn't recognize 64 threads at the moment. There's another video on YouTube of a dual Xeon 7500 machine scoring 20pts...so this machine should be close to 40 if all threads are used. That beats the crap out of the <16pts achieved by a dual 6 core Mac.

[kweechy]

@venom800 Oh and there's no way the Mac actually beat this. It's simply not possible since the raw, non-overclocked score of a dual Xeon 5670 is around 15.45 points. This machine is clearly scoring close to 20 in the video...a number only achievable on an SR2 system with dual OC'd Xeons. Dual stock Xeons simply won't do the trick.

[vjsawvj]

@venom800 Proof!...