Memory is the current bottleneck of the von Neumann, so on-package RAM is likely to be the first application of this rather than 1,000 cores.
Of course, you will still have to deal with heat dissipation and power consumption - so don't expect this in your mobile phones until fabrication technology moves on...
Like so many others, I've used both AMD and Intel processors in various rigs and had only one problem with an Intel quad core, but it wasn't the chip's fault, it was mine. Dust, heat, shutdown. They're both good chips, but I'll have to go with AMD only because their subsidiary, Global Foundries, is building a giant manufacturing plant right near me in Upstate, New York. I'll support any business that has the guts (or stupidity) to do business in the People's Republic of New York.
Like so many others, I've used both AMD and Intel processors in various rigs and had only one problem with an Intel quad core, but it wasn't the chip's fault, it was mine. Dust, heat, shutdown. They're both good chips, but I'll have to go with AMD only because their subsidiary, Global Foundries, is building a giant manufacturing plant right near me in Upstate, New York. I'll support any business that has the guts (or stupidity) to do business in the People's Republic of New York.
AMD better get added on the discussion. I prefer their products, which are reliable, and come for a fraction of the cost. The rumours against it are baseless.
IBM and 3M better not leave out AMD on this one. I hate seeing AMD left in the cold all the time. Intel has repeatedly bribed companies to not use AMD based devices, such as dell and sony. I always look out for the underdog and AMD is being targeted all the time. poor little ol' amd :(
Who gives a crap? like with anything else, just to spite them a year later AMD will come up with a comparable product developed in-house for a fraction of the price.
Is the adhesive isolating and if so then where will the layers be connected? Or is it letting through electric current but only in a certain way (at certain positions or only very directed)?
@595o they will probably be connected on the sides of the chips. like an elevator going from the bottom all the way up and stopping at each chip to connect.
Hmm... well there seems to be potential here, but also some physical limitations. One being, thermal insulation and dissipation. Today's single-layer silicon can waste 100W or more, and a large heat-sink is required for that. There's no way 100 layers could be used like this, and still remain cool. (A 10kW CPU? Air-cooling would simply be impractical, due to the size required. Plus, it would function equivalent to an electric space-heater, in terms of heat generated.)
@x86op IBM has done a lot of research into integrating heat pumps directly onto a chip, I'm sure that will come in handy. They've also announced artificial neural network (ANN) chips that mimic biological systems. ANNs can have incredibly low power requirements for the tasks they perform, but they require massive connectivity (the kind that a 3D substrate can facilitate). Your brain can out perform a soccer-field sized super computer (in some tasks), yet it runs at 30 Watts. That may be the goal
@MySchizoBuddy Well it could be RISC, but then you're talking 4x the code throughput necessary to achieve the same thing that a CISC (x86) accomplishes. Any way it's sliced, thermal efficiency of today's processors isn't spectacular. I just feel something major is going to have to happen to keep something like this cool enough to be practical.
@KlingonSpider why do you care no AMD and all these big companies all want money
THEGAMINGRULER 5 days ago
READY TO BUILD FLYING SAUCER AND GUNDAM ?
dosskull 2 weeks ago
Well finally I had this idea for a long time.
ernis1100 1 month ago
wow gluing processors together, I could have told them that...
johnmt025 1 month ago
good luck cooling that
PirateMcSandwich 1 month ago
GIMME NAO!
Bfheroesmaniac 3 months ago
I I3 M
kai23430 4 months ago
AMD - ADD MORE CORES HURR HURR
IBM - ADD MORE LAYERS HERP DERP
INTEL - ADD MORE CHIPSETS
ThePunisherNWO 5 months ago
Price ?
tornadomannen2 5 months ago
you'd need a monstrous cooling system for this i reckon lol
waseem1173 5 months ago
more renderpower !!!!!!!
Tektechno 5 months ago 3
So does that mean 100 times the cost? :P
m4rx05 5 months ago 6
@m4rx05 No my friend, the question is " Does that mean 100 times the heat? "
Be ready for some buuuurning!
luisces 5 months ago
@luisces yep, can only imagine the temperatures inside those intermediate layers. 1000x faster... from zero to charcoal lol :p
01248163264128256512 4 months ago 5
but this is not the 1st april
youssef0eddoumali 5 months ago
finally a 3D chip. I always imagined it as a cube with many capillaries inside for cooling liquid, but this will do
bgrgyk 5 months ago
Xzibit would have fainted.
sangolt88 5 months ago
Too bad 99.9999% of "tech breakthroughs" are just research firms exaggerating for funds.
glukaschlok 5 months ago
@glukaschlok Too good that IBM and 3M are actually developing and sooner or later, will produce this chip.
lynx821 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@glukaschlok Too good that IBM and 3M are actually developing and sooner or later, will produce this chip.
lynx821 5 months ago
Memory is the current bottleneck of the von Neumann, so on-package RAM is likely to be the first application of this rather than 1,000 cores.
Of course, you will still have to deal with heat dissipation and power consumption - so don't expect this in your mobile phones until fabrication technology moves on...
StevenJTMarsh 5 months ago
1000 times the processing power of today's chips? You mean we'd all have our supercomputer right in our poket? Count me in ...
dilibau 5 months ago
The new chip would consume 1000 times more power and produce 1000 times more heat, right?
xuancuong8x 5 months ago
ITS OVER 9000!!!
AndGoProductions 5 months ago 9
MOAR CORES
AngryC4t 5 months ago 3
@AngryC4t MOAR COARS + MOAR'S LOAR = 2000 times faster
tutankhamunattack 5 months ago
a 5000$ CPU :D
Biko357 5 months ago
I wanted to be the first jerk to "dislike" this.
RCaIabraro 5 months ago
This brick CPU is the beginning of T800 brain chip.
tintin1tintin 5 months ago 3
Comment removed
tintin1tintin 5 months ago
gonna need more arctic 5. MORE MORE MORE.
tyroxis 5 months ago
gonna need more arctic 5. MORE MORE MORE.
tyroxis 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Like so many others, I've used both AMD and Intel processors in various rigs and had only one problem with an Intel quad core, but it wasn't the chip's fault, it was mine. Dust, heat, shutdown. They're both good chips, but I'll have to go with AMD only because their subsidiary, Global Foundries, is building a giant manufacturing plant right near me in Upstate, New York. I'll support any business that has the guts (or stupidity) to do business in the People's Republic of New York.
fidelityeastpub 5 months ago
Like so many others, I've used both AMD and Intel processors in various rigs and had only one problem with an Intel quad core, but it wasn't the chip's fault, it was mine. Dust, heat, shutdown. They're both good chips, but I'll have to go with AMD only because their subsidiary, Global Foundries, is building a giant manufacturing plant right near me in Upstate, New York. I'll support any business that has the guts (or stupidity) to do business in the People's Republic of New York.
fidelityeastpub 5 months ago
I was wondering about the power consumption.
N00bGeek95 5 months ago
100 layers = 100 times power consumtion? x 1 trillion devices?
Pow , Oww.
But serious.
get the FK on it and make it happen already.
RobCardIV 5 months ago
мне интересно ,как они охлаждать собрались этот пирог ?)
BAXFAXTER 5 months ago
but will it blend
MrJufri90 5 months ago 6
AMD better get added on the discussion. I prefer their products, which are reliable, and come for a fraction of the cost. The rumours against it are baseless.
sherryssj5 5 months ago
AMD: ADD MORE CORES
IBM: ADD MORE LAYERS
INTEL: ADD MORE DIMENSIONS
dingumfCallofDuty 5 months ago 76
@dingumfCallofDuty AMD+IBM+INTEL = Captain Planet
komiradTV 5 months ago
@dingumfCallofDuty lol to the cores |:P
gaynm 5 months ago
IBM and 3M better not leave out AMD on this one. I hate seeing AMD left in the cold all the time. Intel has repeatedly bribed companies to not use AMD based devices, such as dell and sony. I always look out for the underdog and AMD is being targeted all the time. poor little ol' amd :(
KlingonSpider 5 months ago 39
@KlingonSpider
Who gives a crap? like with anything else, just to spite them a year later AMD will come up with a comparable product developed in-house for a fraction of the price.
Shitsocash 5 months ago 4
@KlingonSpider It's because AMD sucks. They are left behind because they allow themselves to be left behind.
Fiends4 5 months ago
@Fiends4 I'm sure all the people who thumbed him up use AMD :P
LucianHalo 5 months ago
@KlingonSpider Imagine what all 3 companies could produce if they put their efforts and experience together.
Jijheoo 5 months ago 4
@Jijheoo Something fantastic for the world, but alas it is not the case :(
GigZ333 5 months ago
@Jijheoo This would happend if we have a Resource Based Economy ... !
FieserxFettsack 5 months ago
hope to see this dream become reality , some day
frvfilms 5 months ago
It be nice to use it to make jobs in America !!
Code1967 5 months ago
one day a guy from 3m called the ibm guy and was like hey i have a new glue check it out then they had dinner and made this video
lasterdayfilms 5 months ago
Is the adhesive isolating and if so then where will the layers be connected? Or is it letting through electric current but only in a certain way (at certain positions or only very directed)?
595o 5 months ago
@595o they will probably be connected on the sides of the chips. like an elevator going from the bottom all the way up and stopping at each chip to connect.
KlingonSpider 5 months ago
That sounds amazing. I'm waiting! I hope I can work at IBM someday. =)
th3b0y 5 months ago
Comment removed
th3b0y 5 months ago
IBM will conquer the world...once again.
SkaramandraX 5 months ago 2
it will melt.
bot0016 5 months ago
This in Playstation 4
Racer020975 5 months ago
@Racer020975 Hahaha that made me laugh. Thumbs up.
xalentcash 5 months ago
@x86op - IBM has found new love in water based cooling tech. Recent mainframes come with sophisticated plumbing & water chillers.
kapsethi 5 months ago
for some reason remember Xzibit and Pimp my ride :P
nach0x 5 months ago 2
Maybe in 10 years we can see such ''all in one cpu''
kapefort 5 months ago
Hmm... well there seems to be potential here, but also some physical limitations. One being, thermal insulation and dissipation. Today's single-layer silicon can waste 100W or more, and a large heat-sink is required for that. There's no way 100 layers could be used like this, and still remain cool. (A 10kW CPU? Air-cooling would simply be impractical, due to the size required. Plus, it would function equivalent to an electric space-heater, in terms of heat generated.)
x86op 5 months ago
@x86op do you think they would publicize development for this kind of stuff without thinking ahead of those problems?
I agree with what you're saying,but obviously they have a solution.
Jijheoo 5 months ago
@x86op relax, IBM knows what there doing. Have a little faith will you. You havn't even hard about their PSU or cooling plans as of yet.
Give it time.
YTBYlover 5 months ago
@x86op IBM has done a lot of research into integrating heat pumps directly onto a chip, I'm sure that will come in handy. They've also announced artificial neural network (ANN) chips that mimic biological systems. ANNs can have incredibly low power requirements for the tasks they perform, but they require massive connectivity (the kind that a 3D substrate can facilitate). Your brain can out perform a soccer-field sized super computer (in some tasks), yet it runs at 30 Watts. That may be the goal
Arachnivore 5 months ago 2
@Arachnivore Heat pump? You surely meant compressor cooling, right?
595o 5 months ago
@x86op the X86 single silicon layer wastes 100W or more. why did you assume this is x86 architecture?
MySchizoBuddy 5 months ago
@MySchizoBuddy Microcode is microcode, while the architecture makes some difference it won't be that much.
595o 5 months ago
@MySchizoBuddy Well it could be RISC, but then you're talking 4x the code throughput necessary to achieve the same thing that a CISC (x86) accomplishes. Any way it's sliced, thermal efficiency of today's processors isn't spectacular. I just feel something major is going to have to happen to keep something like this cool enough to be practical.
x86op 5 months ago