Energy is not the same as force. Energy = force * distance.
simontist 6 days ago
@simontist That's what I also think. Figure 6 is flawed: since the point on the crank doesn't move in direction Fr, there is no energy lost there.
An since that is the whole point of this invention, Its worthless.
powerpop23 6 days ago
would you not loose efficiency in the engine from the 'play' given to allow the gears to rotate without binding
signious 1 week ago
Please watch also:
THE SUPER-EFFICIENT ENGINE ( PART 3)
died4hislove 1 month ago
Energy is not the same as force. Energy = force * distance.
simontist 6 days ago
@simontist That's what I also think. Figure 6 is flawed: since the point on the crank doesn't move in direction Fr, there is no energy lost there.
An since that is the whole point of this invention, Its worthless.
powerpop23 6 days ago
would you not loose efficiency in the engine from the 'play' given to allow the gears to rotate without binding
signious 1 week ago
Please watch also:
THE SUPER-EFFICIENT ENGINE ( PART 3)
died4hislove 1 month ago