Thanks for posting! I hope this will inspire the 99% to pull down the walls of the 1%'s gated communities, rush in, and hang 'em from the nearest lamppost! For those responsible for "outsourcing" manufacturing and for "bundling" mortgages, put 'em bound on barges and sink 'em in the middle of the river, or be waiting at the courtroom doors, to grant instant justice! For them, Msr. Guillotine is too humane!
@juliequintard13500 C'est extrait du film "Si Versailles m'était conté" c'est un film franco-italien sorti sur les écrans en 1953, écrit et réalisé par Sacha Guitry. Le titre du film est écrit dans la présentation de la vidéo !
@Veovis523 -> You're right. Secession war was so clean ! And when French people helped US revolution, it was cleaner than when US people helped Afghan people for their liberty... STOP to show off, stop to be arrogant, every country has its own history with good and bad things.
@MrsKette Keep doing comments on Bieber ang Gaga videos and let the serious topics for serious people. You know nothing about French History, only two or three clichés, and you open your big mouth. This is pathetic.
@MrsKette Imagine my surprise when I looked at your profile and saw "Country: United States". Imagine that - an American talking ignorant crap and hurling febrile insults on the Internet! Who would have thought?
The Princess of Lamballe’s body was exposed to public scorn for one day; afterwards it was never found. According to Madame Tussau, Lamballe had a “sweet nature and kindness to everyone [and] extreme sensitivity, which caused her to burst into tears so frequently.” Yes, the sans-culotte had all the reason to eliminate this dangerous 43 year-old aristocrat. So much for “liberté,” Madame Piaf!
@MrsKette -> Do not be so sour. A revolution is rarely clean. Innocent people have paid for the guilty. It turns out that the society of that time was really unfair, that the nobility, who had to defend the people, did more than food on his back, and that the king was very unlucky. He paid for his predecessors.
@julitopepito So exposing facts is now called sourness? Unfairness does NOT excuse mass executions, violence, brutality and pillaging. That is what your wonderful "revolution" was about. What does this mean: "did more than food on his back"? You call "unlucky" a man who stop his guards from shooting his people, and was decapitated by this same people? This was a vicious mob who hardly stood for fairness and justice! How do you know of these "anonymous people" if they were anonymous?!
@MrsKette -> What do you think about the "droit du seigneur" called "droit de cuissage" in french ? What do you think about the fact that only the nobles had the right to hunt or fish ? What do you think about the fact that when the nobles wanted to hunt, they were devasting the crops of the farmers ? What do you think about the fact that people had to cook their bread to the oven of their lord, and had to pay a tax for this ?
@julitopepito Mary Stwart was executed by a queen, for political reasons! Yes: people were oppressed. Yet, NOTHING justifies violence, horror, atrocities, pillage and bloodshed! No excuse for what the “incoruptible” Robespierre and his “essentially bourgeois” acolytes did with the people’s active support. Do you excuse the “septembriseur” Stnislas Maillard? After desecrating the Saint-Denis royal tombs, the French threw Mirabeu’s ashes out the Panthéon and replaced it for Marat’s.
@MrsKette -> The death of Mary Stuart was the will of a Queen, the death of Louis XVI was the vote of the Convention, and both for political reasons. For the horror, attrocities, etc. It's the tribute of every war or revolution. If you read what I wrote earlier, I don't say that revolution was a nice thing. It happenned, it was a good thing for the liberty, but a lot of horrible things were done. It's 11 years that I study my family, and I had people of the both sides. I understand all there...
@julitopepito Louis was murdered by a bunch of blood-thursty thugs, who talked a lot about "égalité, fraternité et liberté," but treated their opponents like trash! That Elizabeth I was wrong, it doesn't make the thugs who murdered Louis XVI right. The American Revolution had no atrocities committed, nothing even remotely close to what your compatriots gladly committed then and now commemorate!
@MrsKette -> You have to show me where I wrote they were right !!! Read everything I write please. Ok for the American revolution. What about the Secession war ?
@MrsKette -> I never said that I was against or not all the murders happenned during the French Revolution. Sadly, you have a binary mind : Wrong people / Right people. It's not the reallity !
@MrsKette -> ... I understand all there point of view. Everyone was for it's interest. For the tombs and the ashes, it's very sad for the heritage conservation, but trust me, no one of these dead people came back to complain.
@julitopepito I am not talking about "heritage conservation"! God, have you no heart, no sense of decency, of right and wrong?! That is what it was all about! Had your parents remains been treated the same way, I am sure you'd react by casually stating that "no one of these dead people came back to complain," wouldn't you? I wonder if you reread your words!
@MrsKette -> I have some people of my family who are dead during the First and the Second World Wars. For example, if people desecrated their sepulture against what they did, I would be very proud that the vandals had their hands dirty because of the bones of my ancestors.
@MrsKette -> Somewhere, the execution of the king was a politic action. Foreign armies wanted to save the French monarchy. It's a bit like the execution of the Queen Mary Stuart, she was too dangerous. And you know, I think that the Hundread Years war, and the religion wars were more horrible than the Revolution, for the people, for the patrimony. I don't say that the Revolution was a nice thing. I just understand why people were furious.
@julitopepito After his execution, the king’s body was thrown on a pit with quicklime and covered with soil, his head placed at his feet! The body of the “veuve Capet” was also thrown in a pit. Ironically, at the Jacobins, it was written “Atelier d’armes républicaines pour foudroyer les tyrans,” this by a “révolution” that created plenty of them! The Duque d’Orléans was a coward who voted his own cousin’s death sentence.
@MrsKette -> "The Duc d'Orléans was a coward"... You have a rapid judgement. I don't want to know what you could have done if you were a farmer or a noble during the revolution period. But I'm sure you would have been an extremist ! ^^
@julitopepito Not as "rapid" as Marie-Antoinette was given by your compatriots! The man swore he was NOT vote to send his own cousin to the guillotine, yet, he did it. You French might consider that to be brave, but where I come from, he acted cowardly! I am sure you know a lot about extremism, being that you defend the murderous regime that condemned 16 year-olds merely for their birth.
I defend... I position myself on both point of views. Thing that seems very difficult for you. You aren't very objective. What you need to understand, it's that if I had seen here a comment like an apology of Robespierre, I had took the defense of the nobless and the clergery. Like we use to say in french, I don't like to listen only one sound of bell.
@julitopepito Right or wrong occurs when I think of the septembriseurs, desecrations, mass-murders, etc, etc, etc. But again, I am not an "objective" French like you, who feel comfy on both sides, and doesn't get bothered by petty concepts--you know, like right and wrong.
@MrsKette -> As we can watch in a lot of American movies, there is only the Rights, or the Wrongs. It's false. For me, it was wrong and right people in nobless, and the same in revolutionnaries. Sometime wrong people did good actions, and right people did bad actions. They were human, they acted for them, sometime for utopic reasons, but more for them (in the both sides) and that's the life. Thanks to these events, we have a Republic in France (it took a long time), I'm proud of my nation.
@julitopepito Oh, Lord, give me patience... Just because you believe it does not make right and wrong relative. A man rapes a woman--wrong--period. Again, stick to French, kid.
@MrsKette -> Would you lack of arguments as to belittle the person you are chatting with? This is not in your honor. Write to me in French if you please, and I will do the same!
@julitopepito Fabre d’Eglantine—Danton’s friend and whose only feat was to write “Il pleut bergère”—was almost incarcerated for his debts; Louis XVI, persuaded by the queen, helped him. He repaid these oppressors by turning into a fervent “sans-coulotte” and lived as the hated aristos in a mansion at Ville L’Evêque Street! In short, most “revolutionaries” became wealthy and emulated the way of life of the ones they murdered for that very sin!
@MrsKette -> Of course ! What do you think ? The 2 first orders represented a very short part of the population, and had the majority of the whealthy ! When people shared this, a lot of bourgeois became VERY VERY rich !
@julitopepito What the hell are you talking about? First orders? People "shared" what? If you can't write English properly, maybe you should try French.
@MrsKette -> You're writting in English, so I don't answer in French. And if I'm living in London now, it's to improve my english. I'm egoist, I'll continue to use your language, it's good for me. ☺
@julitopepito Oh, no need to tell me you are selfish, hon. I happen to disagree: butchering a language is not good for anyone--I'm sure the Brits would agree with me! So, my language is English? (Oh, God, I didn't know I had improved THAT much!) Well, thanks for the compliment; again, another brilliant conclusion, I gather.
@MrsKette -> everyday I have "your english is better than my french". But it's another discussion. The fact that you may be unpleasant shows that I've grown in your retrenchment. An admission of weakness on your part.
@MrsKette -> I forgot to explain, in French vocabulary the 3 orders were the clergery (1st one), the nobless (2nd one), and the "third state" or "Tiers-Etat" (the last one, in all the ways). Actually, if you want to write in French, it'll be a pleasure to answer in my language.
@julitopepito It's not "vocabulary," you mean the class division initiated in the Middle Ages. Yeah, you French got your "republic" after many years of back and forth of emperors and kings, etc. Who gives a crap? You write French, and I'm out to bed: this conversation has made me sleepy! (By the way, get yourself some Word and start using Spelling.
@MrsKette -> Ma chère Madame Kette, vous voilà bien impolie. Ainsi ne pouvez-vous pas tenir une conversation courtoise lorsque vous êtes en désaccord avec votre interlocuteur ? Essayez de garder votre flegme, et argumentez de façon intelligente plutôt que de polluer le débat. (Je suppose que vous êtes ravie de me lire en français ?) ---> et je ferme la parenthèse, comme il est d'usage. ;)
@MrsKette -> and to finish, I'd like to underline that the Revolution was essentially bourgeois, sometime noble (with Maximilien de Robespierre or Philippe-Egalité), and of course, some of these people prefered a social ascencion than the idea of the liberty.
@julitopepito In their prison at the Temple, the prince was parted from his mother (who was accused of incest!); for one year he lived in filth, harshly treated (by the people he so oppressed, right?) and finally died of fever. He was 10 years old; you French should be VERY proud!
@MrsKette -> Yes I know... It's terrible... But how many little Louis of the people of France were dying because of the poorness ? When you read the wills of a lot of nobles, they give some money for the poors of the parish, only because they wanted to save their souls after their death... But they were'nt disturb to tax them in a massive way during their life !
@MrsKette -> Pal ? I don't think so. Actually, it was a pleasure to have this discussion, I laughed a lot, specially with your reaction of the "heritage conservation", so predictable ! My advice: it's very good to watch the horrors endured our poor nobility, but also try to advise you on those suffered by the common people they despised so much (mostly)!
@julitopepito If this revolution of yours was so great, why didn’t you keep their new nomenclature—months and secularized street names? Why did you allow the hated church to return? You even renamed that place of horrors, the Place de la Révolution, to Place de la Concorde, only to hide the crimes your own people practiced! Read among others, Lenôtre, Madame Royale’s biography, and Marie Antoinette’s last letter to her sister-in-law, that the monster Robespierre kept and never reached her.
@MrsKette -> The post-revolution was leaded by people who were thinking a lot about themselves. They turned this like despotism ! But the moderation came back, it took a long time. In England, you had some similar examples of this kind of "pseudo-despotism" like Roger Mortimer or Oliver Cromwell. And as I said yesterday, the Hudread-Years War was absolutely more horrible than our French Revolution. If after that you're still proud to be English, don't worry I'm proud to be French
@julitopepito The "revolutionaries" were thinking about themselves only since day one. Again, that Cromwell was a despot, it does NOT make it right to be one! The Hundred Year war happened during a time-frame that had NOTHING to do with 1700 France--how could you even compare both?! I wonder how you came up with the incredible conclusion that I am "English"... Probably the same way you come to your historical conclusions, I suppose...
@MrsKette -> Another thing, You look very revolted by all these events, but it seems to be like that only because the noble class lost the head. I hope that you don't think that the life of a noble was more precious than the life of a member of the "Tiers-Etat" ?!
And sorry for my horrible English, I had said a lot of other things if I had spoken in French.
Not revolted: disgusted. Listen to your National anthem! Instead of rejecting it, you actually commemorate all that is vile and degrading, a violent revolution--La Terreur! I don't care about noble class--again, one of your insights, I guess--but am utterly shocked that humans who breath the same air I do and like to consider themselves highly sophisticated, actually commemorate barbarism! For me LIFE is precious and civilized justice should always prevail--not butchery. (Write in French, then!)
@MrsKette -> I prefer to live under the 5th Republic than under the absolute monarchy. And for me, if we have one thing to celebrate, it's the night of 4 August
@MrsKette -> Because it is easy to take for example those great characters of France at the time. But think of all those anonymous people who worked hard to feed the idle.
Immediately upon her refusal the veredict was “Élargissez madame”: she was taken outside and decapitated. Her clothes removed, her naked body joined a pile of the many who, just before her, had benefited from the Revolution’s “fraternité”! Her head was then stuck on a pike, and paraded under the Temple’s window, where the royal family was imprisoned. It is said Marie Antoinette was asked to kiss her lips, but the queen understandably fainted. Continues
@MrsKette Right and wrong is relative to the ones who use it to their advantage—who would defend rape by accusing the victim of dressing provocatively. Robespierre and his acolytes committed horrendous excesses that surpassed the most despotic kings. The “Revolution” removed state religion, and enthroned a new one, state mandated. In this deist dictator’s own words on the 20 prairial (June/8/1794): “Il est enfin arrivé le jour fortuné que le people consacre à l’Etre suprême…”
More than 6,000 people were incarcerated at one time; the population of Paris was around 620,000. In just six weeks, and without the benefit of trial, your “revolution” executed more than 1,300 people. Their bodies were thrown in mass graves at Picpus. Sure when you approach Picpus your bosom swells with pride for your countrymen’s accomplishments!
And finally, reason makes little sense to the unreasonable. You exposed here your ignorance—and now in French. In order to defend this bloodshed (that Voullard so appropriately called “la messe rouge”), you have to believe in shades of gray, not right and wrong, good and bad. You have to minimize the enormity of the rapist’s crime… Et bien, salut! Have a nice life.
@MrsKette -> I admit that you are tiring. There are worse than digging up the dead as part of a revolution. In 1870, when burned Tuileries, Paris lost its archives, and it is more terrible than to move the dead. The severed heads, I admit it's terribly sad and distressing, but breaking the symbols of a regime that oppression for centuries, coming from an angry mob, it makes sense.
And when we'll have hung them all, we’ll stick a shovel up their ass. “Nous n’avions plus ni nobles, ni prêtres” = we will have no more nobles, nor priests; yet 34 year-old monster Danton’s marriage to 16 year-old Louise Gély was secretly officiated by the abbé de Keravenan! One example of their “égalité,” the Princess of Lamballe was asked to “take an oath to love liberty and equality and to swear hatred to the King and the Queen and to the monarchy." Continues
Shame on Edit Piaf! Louis XVI forbed the Garde to use their weapons! He believed his people wouldn’t hurt him. They executed him and the queen; nobody knows what happened to Louis XVII. The music goes like this: “les aristocrates à la lanterne [,] on les pendra [,] on les rompra [,] on les brûlera. […] Et quand on les aura tous pendus, on leur fichera la pelle au cul”—aristocrats to the lamp post [,] we will hang them [,] break them [,] burn them! […]" CONTINUES
@MrsKette -> I don't understand why you said "shame on Edith Piaf" ?! It was a movie. Do you say shame on Helen Mirren when she's Queen Elisabeth (Ist) ? (this example is a bit polemic, I could say, when Bruno Ganz is Adolf Hitler)
@julitopepito I beg your pardon, but I thought we were discussing la Piaf. Are you interested in starting a news discussion on these other two actors? Or are you just trying to avoid what you started?
@MrsKette -> Actually, I like so much Helen Mirren ☺☺☺ But your sentence about Piaf is very strange and underlines the fact that your reasonning make little sense.
(Big sigh) Man, are you really stupid or you’re just trying to sound cute? Shame on Edit Piaf for glorifying a murderous regime, got it? (You seem to have an abundance of free time, so go do something useful.)
@MrsKette -> She's glorifying this in a movie : Si Versailles m'étais compté. I think there is something you don't understand. And thank you, I have free time like other working people. I use it like I enjoy. I don't need your advice.
@MrsKette if you think that justice is a mistake... vous vous êtes donnez la peine de naitre pour obtenir vos droits on s' est donné la peine de faire fonctionner la guillotine pour en avoir... rends toi enfin utile et ferme ton clape merde
Mais il y a une petite faute - quand les femmes parisiennes sont venues a Versailles demander du pain - c'était en octobre 1789 - cette version de "Ca ira" - celle avec "les aristocrates a la lanterne" - n'existait pas encore. Elle n'a été créée qu'en 1793. Le "ca ira" de 1789 avait les paroles différentes, disons moins agressives.
@JulieBonnard Excusez-moi, je me suis trompée, en 1789, aucune version de "ca ira" n'existait, la premiere a été composée en 1790. Mais ce n'est qu'un détail sans importance, le vidéo est superbe.
@JulieBonnard Excusez-moi, je me suis trompée, en 1789, aucune version de "ca ira" n'existait, la premiere a été composée en 1790. Mais ce n'est qu'un détail sans importance, le vidéo est superbe.
@maria0antonia bientôt , le peuple voit que le roi se graisse sur notre compte, bientot, on va le faire G ou P je met pas la fin des mots, on verra... bref, nous en sommes presque à ces temps la, taxes en tout genres, etc.............ah ça ira.............bis
ha aaaaaa !!!! Une femme qui chantait avec ses tripes ! plutôt rare de nos jours ( à part la fille d'higelin ??) !!!! Une voix puissante comme trop peu ont de nos jours !!!
salut les amis,y'a-t-il quel qu'un qui pourrait me donner le titre complet de ce film,je suis entrain de faire ma recherche de mémoire de fin d'etudes sur le sujet de :
" l'humanisme et son impacte sur la musique:l'example du chant patriotique dans la révolution française" et merci :)
salut les amis,y'a-t-il quel qu'un qui pourrait me donner le titre complet de ce film,je suis entrain de faire ma recherche de mémoire de fin d'etude sur le sujet de :
l'humanisme et son impact sur la musique:l'example du chant patriotique dans la révolution française
Ok ok, on s'est mal compris!! Pas la peine de me répondre comme ça ... j'ai posé la réponse après quelques recherches!
En fait, sur le coup, je t'ai demandé car je n'en ai vu personnellement qu'un seul (et il y a longtemps) : je ne souviens même plus du titre ... Potemkine ou quelques chose se rapportant au sujet je crois, je voulais juste vérifier si c'était celui-là ou un des autres que je n'ai donc pas vu ...
Celui pour fêter les 10ans de la révolution russe (en 1927 donc ) commandé par Staline,avec une histoire bien étendu falsifié ( Trotsky étant déjà tombé en disgrâce,ainsi que la majeure partie des opposants directs à Staline ) mais sublimé par le véritable talent artistique de Eisenstein.
T'es mignon mais c'est le nom que j'attendais ... ^^
(d'autant qu'il n'y a AUCUN film d'Eisenstein de 1927 ...)
Quand au nom, c'est "Octobre : Dix jours qui secouèrent le monde " (Октябрь : Десять дней, которые потрясли мир) de ... 1928 !!! (sorti en mars 1928) de (réalisation) Sergueï Eisenstein et Grigori Aleksandrov! ...
Thanks for posting! I hope this will inspire the 99% to pull down the walls of the 1%'s gated communities, rush in, and hang 'em from the nearest lamppost! For those responsible for "outsourcing" manufacturing and for "bundling" mortgages, put 'em bound on barges and sink 'em in the middle of the river, or be waiting at the courtroom doors, to grant instant justice! For them, Msr. Guillotine is too humane!
TheEmagicmtman 1 month ago
¡Qué buenos tiempos!
ermigue 2 months ago
Edith Piaf est vraiment exceptionnelle *.* magnifique voix !
Stevendu51100 2 months ago
c'est extres de quel film?
juliequintard13500 2 months ago
@juliequintard13500 C'est extrait du film "Si Versailles m'était conté" c'est un film franco-italien sorti sur les écrans en 1953, écrit et réalisé par Sacha Guitry. Le titre du film est écrit dans la présentation de la vidéo !
Stevendu51100 2 months ago
@Stevendu51100 merci beaucoup
juliequintard13500 2 months ago
@juliequintard13500 Je t'en prie ! ;)
Stevendu51100 2 months ago
The revolution in the U.S. was way too well-behaved. The French know how to get shit done.
Veovis523 3 months ago
@Veovis523 -> You're right. Secession war was so clean ! And when French people helped US revolution, it was cleaner than when US people helped Afghan people for their liberty... STOP to show off, stop to be arrogant, every country has its own history with good and bad things.
julitopepito 3 months ago
You made your damn guillotine workd in order to kill people, simple like that. And go fuck your jackass effeminate Frenchies, you bitch!
MrsKette 4 months ago
@MrsKette Keep doing comments on Bieber ang Gaga videos and let the serious topics for serious people. You know nothing about French History, only two or three clichés, and you open your big mouth. This is pathetic.
NFL9475 3 months ago 2
@MrsKette Imagine my surprise when I looked at your profile and saw "Country: United States". Imagine that - an American talking ignorant crap and hurling febrile insults on the Internet! Who would have thought?
libertyordeaf 3 months ago 2
@MrsKette -> Marvellous vocabulary ! You lose ! :)
julitopepito 3 months ago
Happy Murderous Mob Day, julitop! ;-)~
MrsKette 4 months ago
chanson de mon enfance soviétique)))
le chant choral à l'école))
lindanet17 4 months ago
Terrible.The republic brought France more problems than positive consequences-
EnLugal 4 months ago
Oh my goodness, I remember seeing this film ages ago but have no memory of Edith being in it. I must make a point of seing it again.
Babyhowdy233 4 months ago
vous vous êtes donnés
Islascostieras 4 months ago
she's so small..
stanum88 6 months ago
Une chanson qui prend aux tripes, une chanteuse légendaire, et un film culte !
julitopepito 7 months ago 2
Comment removed
julitopepito 7 months ago
The Princess of Lamballe’s body was exposed to public scorn for one day; afterwards it was never found. According to Madame Tussau, Lamballe had a “sweet nature and kindness to everyone [and] extreme sensitivity, which caused her to burst into tears so frequently.” Yes, the sans-culotte had all the reason to eliminate this dangerous 43 year-old aristocrat. So much for “liberté,” Madame Piaf!
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> Do not be so sour. A revolution is rarely clean. Innocent people have paid for the guilty. It turns out that the society of that time was really unfair, that the nobility, who had to defend the people, did more than food on his back, and that the king was very unlucky. He paid for his predecessors.
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito So exposing facts is now called sourness? Unfairness does NOT excuse mass executions, violence, brutality and pillaging. That is what your wonderful "revolution" was about. What does this mean: "did more than food on his back"? You call "unlucky" a man who stop his guards from shooting his people, and was decapitated by this same people? This was a vicious mob who hardly stood for fairness and justice! How do you know of these "anonymous people" if they were anonymous?!
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> What do you think about the "droit du seigneur" called "droit de cuissage" in french ? What do you think about the fact that only the nobles had the right to hunt or fish ? What do you think about the fact that when the nobles wanted to hunt, they were devasting the crops of the farmers ? What do you think about the fact that people had to cook their bread to the oven of their lord, and had to pay a tax for this ?
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito Mary Stwart was executed by a queen, for political reasons! Yes: people were oppressed. Yet, NOTHING justifies violence, horror, atrocities, pillage and bloodshed! No excuse for what the “incoruptible” Robespierre and his “essentially bourgeois” acolytes did with the people’s active support. Do you excuse the “septembriseur” Stnislas Maillard? After desecrating the Saint-Denis royal tombs, the French threw Mirabeu’s ashes out the Panthéon and replaced it for Marat’s.
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> The death of Mary Stuart was the will of a Queen, the death of Louis XVI was the vote of the Convention, and both for political reasons. For the horror, attrocities, etc. It's the tribute of every war or revolution. If you read what I wrote earlier, I don't say that revolution was a nice thing. It happenned, it was a good thing for the liberty, but a lot of horrible things were done. It's 11 years that I study my family, and I had people of the both sides. I understand all there...
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito Louis was murdered by a bunch of blood-thursty thugs, who talked a lot about "égalité, fraternité et liberté," but treated their opponents like trash! That Elizabeth I was wrong, it doesn't make the thugs who murdered Louis XVI right. The American Revolution had no atrocities committed, nothing even remotely close to what your compatriots gladly committed then and now commemorate!
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> You have to show me where I wrote they were right !!! Read everything I write please. Ok for the American revolution. What about the Secession war ?
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito hon, if you are not against that bloodshed, what else can one conclude?!
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> I never said that I was against or not all the murders happenned during the French Revolution. Sadly, you have a binary mind : Wrong people / Right people. It's not the reallity !
julitopepito 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> ... I understand all there point of view. Everyone was for it's interest. For the tombs and the ashes, it's very sad for the heritage conservation, but trust me, no one of these dead people came back to complain.
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito I am not talking about "heritage conservation"! God, have you no heart, no sense of decency, of right and wrong?! That is what it was all about! Had your parents remains been treated the same way, I am sure you'd react by casually stating that "no one of these dead people came back to complain," wouldn't you? I wonder if you reread your words!
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> My parents are not the symbol of all a period.
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito In other words: so long as it is someone else, it's OK to desecrate their tombs. Got it now!
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> I have some people of my family who are dead during the First and the Second World Wars. For example, if people desecrated their sepulture against what they did, I would be very proud that the vandals had their hands dirty because of the bones of my ancestors.
julitopepito 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> Somewhere, the execution of the king was a politic action. Foreign armies wanted to save the French monarchy. It's a bit like the execution of the Queen Mary Stuart, she was too dangerous. And you know, I think that the Hundread Years war, and the religion wars were more horrible than the Revolution, for the people, for the patrimony. I don't say that the Revolution was a nice thing. I just understand why people were furious.
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito After his execution, the king’s body was thrown on a pit with quicklime and covered with soil, his head placed at his feet! The body of the “veuve Capet” was also thrown in a pit. Ironically, at the Jacobins, it was written “Atelier d’armes républicaines pour foudroyer les tyrans,” this by a “révolution” that created plenty of them! The Duque d’Orléans was a coward who voted his own cousin’s death sentence.
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> "The Duc d'Orléans was a coward"... You have a rapid judgement. I don't want to know what you could have done if you were a farmer or a noble during the revolution period. But I'm sure you would have been an extremist ! ^^
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito Not as "rapid" as Marie-Antoinette was given by your compatriots! The man swore he was NOT vote to send his own cousin to the guillotine, yet, he did it. You French might consider that to be brave, but where I come from, he acted cowardly! I am sure you know a lot about extremism, being that you defend the murderous regime that condemned 16 year-olds merely for their birth.
MrsKette 7 months ago
I defend... I position myself on both point of views. Thing that seems very difficult for you. You aren't very objective. What you need to understand, it's that if I had seen here a comment like an apology of Robespierre, I had took the defense of the nobless and the clergery. Like we use to say in french, I don't like to listen only one sound of bell.
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito Right or wrong occurs when I think of the septembriseurs, desecrations, mass-murders, etc, etc, etc. But again, I am not an "objective" French like you, who feel comfy on both sides, and doesn't get bothered by petty concepts--you know, like right and wrong.
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> As we can watch in a lot of American movies, there is only the Rights, or the Wrongs. It's false. For me, it was wrong and right people in nobless, and the same in revolutionnaries. Sometime wrong people did good actions, and right people did bad actions. They were human, they acted for them, sometime for utopic reasons, but more for them (in the both sides) and that's the life. Thanks to these events, we have a Republic in France (it took a long time), I'm proud of my nation.
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito Oh, Lord, give me patience... Just because you believe it does not make right and wrong relative. A man rapes a woman--wrong--period. Again, stick to French, kid.
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> Would you lack of arguments as to belittle the person you are chatting with? This is not in your honor. Write to me in French if you please, and I will do the same!
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito Fabre d’Eglantine—Danton’s friend and whose only feat was to write “Il pleut bergère”—was almost incarcerated for his debts; Louis XVI, persuaded by the queen, helped him. He repaid these oppressors by turning into a fervent “sans-coulotte” and lived as the hated aristos in a mansion at Ville L’Evêque Street! In short, most “revolutionaries” became wealthy and emulated the way of life of the ones they murdered for that very sin!
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> Of course ! What do you think ? The 2 first orders represented a very short part of the population, and had the majority of the whealthy ! When people shared this, a lot of bourgeois became VERY VERY rich !
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito What the hell are you talking about? First orders? People "shared" what? If you can't write English properly, maybe you should try French.
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> You're writting in English, so I don't answer in French. And if I'm living in London now, it's to improve my english. I'm egoist, I'll continue to use your language, it's good for me. ☺
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito Oh, no need to tell me you are selfish, hon. I happen to disagree: butchering a language is not good for anyone--I'm sure the Brits would agree with me! So, my language is English? (Oh, God, I didn't know I had improved THAT much!) Well, thanks for the compliment; again, another brilliant conclusion, I gather.
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> everyday I have "your english is better than my french". But it's another discussion. The fact that you may be unpleasant shows that I've grown in your retrenchment. An admission of weakness on your part.
julitopepito 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> I forgot to explain, in French vocabulary the 3 orders were the clergery (1st one), the nobless (2nd one), and the "third state" or "Tiers-Etat" (the last one, in all the ways). Actually, if you want to write in French, it'll be a pleasure to answer in my language.
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito It's not "vocabulary," you mean the class division initiated in the Middle Ages. Yeah, you French got your "republic" after many years of back and forth of emperors and kings, etc. Who gives a crap? You write French, and I'm out to bed: this conversation has made me sleepy! (By the way, get yourself some Word and start using Spelling.
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> Ma chère Madame Kette, vous voilà bien impolie. Ainsi ne pouvez-vous pas tenir une conversation courtoise lorsque vous êtes en désaccord avec votre interlocuteur ? Essayez de garder votre flegme, et argumentez de façon intelligente plutôt que de polluer le débat. (Je suppose que vous êtes ravie de me lire en français ?) ---> et je ferme la parenthèse, comme il est d'usage. ;)
julitopepito 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> and to finish, I'd like to underline that the Revolution was essentially bourgeois, sometime noble (with Maximilien de Robespierre or Philippe-Egalité), and of course, some of these people prefered a social ascencion than the idea of the liberty.
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito In their prison at the Temple, the prince was parted from his mother (who was accused of incest!); for one year he lived in filth, harshly treated (by the people he so oppressed, right?) and finally died of fever. He was 10 years old; you French should be VERY proud!
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> Yes I know... It's terrible... But how many little Louis of the people of France were dying because of the poorness ? When you read the wills of a lot of nobles, they give some money for the poors of the parish, only because they wanted to save their souls after their death... But they were'nt disturb to tax them in a massive way during their life !
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito Oh, I finally understand, you're saying that one wrong excuses another/ You have a very twisted sense of right and wrong, pal!
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> Pal ? I don't think so. Actually, it was a pleasure to have this discussion, I laughed a lot, specially with your reaction of the "heritage conservation", so predictable ! My advice: it's very good to watch the horrors endured our poor nobility, but also try to advise you on those suffered by the common people they despised so much (mostly)!
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito If this revolution of yours was so great, why didn’t you keep their new nomenclature—months and secularized street names? Why did you allow the hated church to return? You even renamed that place of horrors, the Place de la Révolution, to Place de la Concorde, only to hide the crimes your own people practiced! Read among others, Lenôtre, Madame Royale’s biography, and Marie Antoinette’s last letter to her sister-in-law, that the monster Robespierre kept and never reached her.
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> The post-revolution was leaded by people who were thinking a lot about themselves. They turned this like despotism ! But the moderation came back, it took a long time. In England, you had some similar examples of this kind of "pseudo-despotism" like Roger Mortimer or Oliver Cromwell. And as I said yesterday, the Hudread-Years War was absolutely more horrible than our French Revolution. If after that you're still proud to be English, don't worry I'm proud to be French
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito The "revolutionaries" were thinking about themselves only since day one. Again, that Cromwell was a despot, it does NOT make it right to be one! The Hundred Year war happened during a time-frame that had NOTHING to do with 1700 France--how could you even compare both?! I wonder how you came up with the incredible conclusion that I am "English"... Probably the same way you come to your historical conclusions, I suppose...
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> Another thing, You look very revolted by all these events, but it seems to be like that only because the noble class lost the head. I hope that you don't think that the life of a noble was more precious than the life of a member of the "Tiers-Etat" ?!
And sorry for my horrible English, I had said a lot of other things if I had spoken in French.
julitopepito 7 months ago
Not revolted: disgusted. Listen to your National anthem! Instead of rejecting it, you actually commemorate all that is vile and degrading, a violent revolution--La Terreur! I don't care about noble class--again, one of your insights, I guess--but am utterly shocked that humans who breath the same air I do and like to consider themselves highly sophisticated, actually commemorate barbarism! For me LIFE is precious and civilized justice should always prevail--not butchery. (Write in French, then!)
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> I prefer to live under the 5th Republic than under the absolute monarchy. And for me, if we have one thing to celebrate, it's the night of 4 August
julitopepito 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> Because it is easy to take for example those great characters of France at the time. But think of all those anonymous people who worked hard to feed the idle.
julitopepito 7 months ago
Immediately upon her refusal the veredict was “Élargissez madame”: she was taken outside and decapitated. Her clothes removed, her naked body joined a pile of the many who, just before her, had benefited from the Revolution’s “fraternité”! Her head was then stuck on a pike, and paraded under the Temple’s window, where the royal family was imprisoned. It is said Marie Antoinette was asked to kiss her lips, but the queen understandably fainted. Continues
MrsKette 7 months ago 2
@MrsKette Right and wrong is relative to the ones who use it to their advantage—who would defend rape by accusing the victim of dressing provocatively. Robespierre and his acolytes committed horrendous excesses that surpassed the most despotic kings. The “Revolution” removed state religion, and enthroned a new one, state mandated. In this deist dictator’s own words on the 20 prairial (June/8/1794): “Il est enfin arrivé le jour fortuné que le people consacre à l’Etre suprême…”
MrsKette 7 months ago
More than 6,000 people were incarcerated at one time; the population of Paris was around 620,000. In just six weeks, and without the benefit of trial, your “revolution” executed more than 1,300 people. Their bodies were thrown in mass graves at Picpus. Sure when you approach Picpus your bosom swells with pride for your countrymen’s accomplishments!
MrsKette 7 months ago
And finally, reason makes little sense to the unreasonable. You exposed here your ignorance—and now in French. In order to defend this bloodshed (that Voullard so appropriately called “la messe rouge”), you have to believe in shades of gray, not right and wrong, good and bad. You have to minimize the enormity of the rapist’s crime… Et bien, salut! Have a nice life.
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> I admit that you are tiring. There are worse than digging up the dead as part of a revolution. In 1870, when burned Tuileries, Paris lost its archives, and it is more terrible than to move the dead. The severed heads, I admit it's terribly sad and distressing, but breaking the symbols of a regime that oppression for centuries, coming from an angry mob, it makes sense.
julitopepito 7 months ago 2
@MrsKette I agree, remove a state to put another is idiot.
julitopepito 7 months ago
The coment was : "I agree, remove a state *religion* to put another is idiot
julitopepito 7 months ago
And when we'll have hung them all, we’ll stick a shovel up their ass. “Nous n’avions plus ni nobles, ni prêtres” = we will have no more nobles, nor priests; yet 34 year-old monster Danton’s marriage to 16 year-old Louise Gély was secretly officiated by the abbé de Keravenan! One example of their “égalité,” the Princess of Lamballe was asked to “take an oath to love liberty and equality and to swear hatred to the King and the Queen and to the monarchy." Continues
MrsKette 7 months ago 2
Shame on Edit Piaf! Louis XVI forbed the Garde to use their weapons! He believed his people wouldn’t hurt him. They executed him and the queen; nobody knows what happened to Louis XVII. The music goes like this: “les aristocrates à la lanterne [,] on les pendra [,] on les rompra [,] on les brûlera. […] Et quand on les aura tous pendus, on leur fichera la pelle au cul”—aristocrats to the lamp post [,] we will hang them [,] break them [,] burn them! […]" CONTINUES
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> I don't understand why you said "shame on Edith Piaf" ?! It was a movie. Do you say shame on Helen Mirren when she's Queen Elisabeth (Ist) ? (this example is a bit polemic, I could say, when Bruno Ganz is Adolf Hitler)
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito I beg your pardon, but I thought we were discussing la Piaf. Are you interested in starting a news discussion on these other two actors? Or are you just trying to avoid what you started?
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> Actually, I like so much Helen Mirren ☺☺☺ But your sentence about Piaf is very strange and underlines the fact that your reasonning make little sense.
julitopepito 7 months ago
(Big sigh) Man, are you really stupid or you’re just trying to sound cute? Shame on Edit Piaf for glorifying a murderous regime, got it? (You seem to have an abundance of free time, so go do something useful.)
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> She's glorifying this in a movie : Si Versailles m'étais compté. I think there is something you don't understand. And thank you, I have free time like other working people. I use it like I enjoy. I don't need your advice.
julitopepito 7 months ago
@julitopepito Now, you clearly need my approval.
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette -> Et je suis sûr que si PIAF vous lisait, elle vous balancerait un déluge de décibels de "NON RIEN DE RIEN, NON JE NE REGRETTE RIEN !" :P
julitopepito 7 months ago 6
@julitopepito, good for her. Not all people are humble enough to realize when they make mistakes.
MrsKette 7 months ago
@MrsKette if you think that justice is a mistake... vous vous êtes donnez la peine de naitre pour obtenir vos droits on s' est donné la peine de faire fonctionner la guillotine pour en avoir... rends toi enfin utile et ferme ton clape merde
frenchrebell 6 months ago 6
@MrsKette -> Happy Bastille day !!!!!!!!!!! :)
julitopepito 6 months ago
Quand 2012 nous sera "compté" !
manon278008 8 months ago
Edith est géniale, comme toujours:-)
Mais il y a une petite faute - quand les femmes parisiennes sont venues a Versailles demander du pain - c'était en octobre 1789 - cette version de "Ca ira" - celle avec "les aristocrates a la lanterne" - n'existait pas encore. Elle n'a été créée qu'en 1793. Le "ca ira" de 1789 avait les paroles différentes, disons moins agressives.
Mais c'est beau quand meme!
JulieBonnard 9 months ago
@JulieBonnard Excusez-moi, je me suis trompée, en 1789, aucune version de "ca ira" n'existait, la premiere a été composée en 1790. Mais ce n'est qu'un détail sans importance, le vidéo est superbe.
JulieBonnard 9 months ago
@JulieBonnard Excusez-moi, je me suis trompée, en 1789, aucune version de "ca ira" n'existait, la premiere a été composée en 1790. Mais ce n'est qu'un détail sans importance, le vidéo est superbe.
JulieBonnard 9 months ago
Vive la Roi!
hahaimpatrick 9 months ago
Vive la Republique!
reonina 9 months ago 2
She looks and sounds so great here!
IngerAnna 10 months ago
Super !!!
aurorakater711 10 months ago
SUPER!!!! - many Thanks!
cubasi2010 10 months ago
on veut voir Sarko !!!!!
boulara1 10 months ago
Sacha Guitry was a Vichy collaboracionist.
oliaiguambfigues76 10 months ago
Mob rule doesn't equal democracy: in fact is the worst of tyrannies.
oliaiguambfigues76 10 months ago
a quand l'égalitée
nancy6403 11 months ago
Viel zu artifiziell dargeboten von Edith, unpassend zu diesem Anlass eines Aufruhrs.
DNMK 11 months ago
merci lepin :)
artistov 11 months ago
Haha :D
Heute in Geschichte angehört xDD
KwieKaja 11 months ago
(l) le révolutionnaire aux côtés d'édith piaf à 1:20. Il s'y croit lui.
mlleRedfield 11 months ago
Edith est la plus belle tricoteuse! ^__^
Les aristocrates à la lanterne! ♪
MilchundSchokolade13 1 year ago
le titre du film c'est : " Si versailles m'était conté "
Armis88 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear YouTube,
The Like/Dislike system, I can live with. I've gotten used to it now.
The new comment layout, fine with me.
But THIS, is just too much too take! The front page has completely lost it's organised, simple layout!
I don't know where you get your ideas, but I think I speak for a big part of the community when I say "YouTube, go F*ck yourself."
I hate people who ask for thumbs up, but this is not meant to be funny. This is serious! Give this a thumbs up and copy/paste it
felixhodges 1 year ago
Vive le Roi!
juultjuh99 1 year ago
à 1:24 elle faillit coudes que homme off l'ladder :)
ajferet 1 year ago
Europe 2013 ...
Pfaffenfresser1 1 year ago
@Pfaffenfresser1 How do you mean?
juultjuh99 1 year ago
Le titre complet est comme indiqué "Si Versailles m'était conté" en DVD chez René Chateau
krys399 1 year ago
au jour d'hui la lumiére m´embrasse
LE SEULE KE JE VEUX DIRE _:___
CA IRA CA IRA CA IRA CA IRA
Ananjeix 1 year ago
"War on the German state of affairs!"
MsDicken1 1 year ago
All power to the Revolution!
AndrewMann552 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
maria0antonia 1 year ago
A quand la prochaine ???
Prévenez-moi SVP !!!
maria0antonia 1 year ago
@maria0antonia bientôt , le peuple voit que le roi se graisse sur notre compte, bientot, on va le faire G ou P je met pas la fin des mots, on verra... bref, nous en sommes presque à ces temps la, taxes en tout genres, etc.............ah ça ira.............bis
76680papoune 1 year ago
Unique. Edith Piaf's voice is inimitable.
fondamartin48 1 year ago 2
Faru it-tapiri tad-dranag. Drenage!
plcar 1 year ago
ha aaaaaa !!!! Une femme qui chantait avec ses tripes ! plutôt rare de nos jours ( à part la fille d'higelin ??) !!!! Une voix puissante comme trop peu ont de nos jours !!!
merci pour ce rappel ! merci pour ta vidéo !
grandfred1er 1 year ago
Vive Edith Piaf!
salcudean10 1 year ago
Vive le Roi! A bas la Republique!
thebillX7 1 year ago
watch the extra to the left at :15...
He looks like he is trying not to fall off the ladder!
ajferet 1 year ago
Wow, she really is as tiny as Ed Sullivan said she was!
ajferet 1 year ago
i love this but ca ira means the anger ? or wath
allimones 1 year ago
No, it means something like "It will be all right" or "It will be fine", it has nothing to do with "ire" which indeed means "anger".
It was inspired by one of Benjamin Franklin's declaration.
There's an interesting article on Wikipedia explaining the origins of the song and its title.
benefity 1 year ago
@allimones no, ca ira means "its ll better", its a joke for say all is worst and worst then king promises better.
chrisbreizh29 1 year ago
Wow what a voice!!!
littlelady8080 2 years ago
It will! It will! It will!
PhilipineMan 2 years ago
j'ai adoré ce film
takouska1 2 years ago
J'aime ce filme!
guissoffi 2 years ago
Comment removed
WackrerSchwabe 2 years ago
salut les amis,y'a-t-il quel qu'un qui pourrait me donner le titre complet de ce film,je suis entrain de faire ma recherche de mémoire de fin d'etudes sur le sujet de :
" l'humanisme et son impacte sur la musique:l'example du chant patriotique dans la révolution française" et merci :)
artistov 2 years ago
j' ai inscris les informations en haut à dropite de la vidéo!
astrasburgo 2 years ago
Si Versailles m'était conté" stage director: Sacha Guitry April 1953
Ulysse2europe 2 years ago
@artistov bobsoir , le titre du film est : si versailles m'était conté de Sacha GUITRY
lepin34 1 year ago
salut les amis,y'a-t-il quel qu'un qui pourrait me donner le titre complet de ce film,je suis entrain de faire ma recherche de mémoire de fin d'etude sur le sujet de :
l'humanisme et son impact sur la musique:l'example du chant patriotique dans la révolution française
artistov 2 years ago
Edith leading the People!
a026and 2 years ago 7
We will kill the aristocrats!!! Die capitalists!!!
krasnoarmets 2 years ago 5
Apprends donc à lire : "commandé"...
Je ne parlai pas de sa sortie,merci bien.
Et si c'est pour poser les questions et les réponses,un blog te suffirais amplement.
AlonsoCharles1 2 years ago
Ok ok, on s'est mal compris!! Pas la peine de me répondre comme ça ... j'ai posé la réponse après quelques recherches!
En fait, sur le coup, je t'ai demandé car je n'en ai vu personnellement qu'un seul (et il y a longtemps) : je ne souviens même plus du titre ... Potemkine ou quelques chose se rapportant au sujet je crois, je voulais juste vérifier si c'était celui-là ou un des autres que je n'ai donc pas vu ...
drakul46 2 years ago
Cette scène me fais étrangement penser à celle d'Eiseintein,ou le peuple russe assaille un portail orné de manière similaire...
La superbe voix de Piaf en moins ^^
AlonsoCharles1 2 years ago
Lequel film?
drakul46 2 years ago
Celui pour fêter les 10ans de la révolution russe (en 1927 donc ) commandé par Staline,avec une histoire bien étendu falsifié ( Trotsky étant déjà tombé en disgrâce,ainsi que la majeure partie des opposants directs à Staline ) mais sublimé par le véritable talent artistique de Eisenstein.
AlonsoCharles1 2 years ago
T'es mignon mais c'est le nom que j'attendais ... ^^
(d'autant qu'il n'y a AUCUN film d'Eisenstein de 1927 ...)
Quand au nom, c'est "Octobre : Dix jours qui secouèrent le monde " (Октябрь : Десять дней, которые потрясли мир) de ... 1928 !!! (sorti en mars 1928) de (réalisation) Sergueï Eisenstein et Grigori Aleksandrov! ...
drakul46 2 years ago
The most discusting song ever written.
Shame!!!
Vicomte L. de D. - A.
corpo69 2 years ago
Edith bringing democracy to France.
mango2005 2 years ago 5
I see:-) She is great!
SadLisa777 2 years ago
Wird Zeit, daß wir dieses Lied auch mal in Deutschland singen!
CaptainOi666 2 years ago 2
Aber das, möglichst schnell!
AthaNapo1994 2 years ago
@CaptainOi666 Es wäre auch Zeit, dass man es Frankreich wieder singen würde !
manon278008 8 months ago
Vive Edith ! Vive la France !
MaxRWF 2 years ago
Bardzo aktualne!!!
krogulech 2 years ago
Genial ,génial mille étoile pour ce film et le chant d'Edith
Missmontagne 2 years ago 2
merci maintenant je vais pouvoir terminer mon exposer sur les chants revolutionnaire en histoire
aubin62460 2 years ago
j'ai lu quelque part que la séquence a été tourné plusieurs fois par guitry pour le seul plaisir du maitre
legende ou pas je ne sais pas...
lediabledelabastille 2 years ago
Incroyable cette Edith Piaf, elle chante comme une vraie Poissonière des Halles!! ça sent bon le peuple!
Aucun de nos minets roucoulants ou de nos chanteuses à voix sans voix (!) n'est capable d'une telle performance de nos jours.
Atrux1 2 years ago 8
vive l'Edith!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
wenarto 2 years ago 4
Quelle jolie et merveilleuse Marianne que la grande Edith Piaf =)
Mielise 2 years ago 4
merci merci
marcelaleontina 2 years ago
How to recuperate bonuses from failed bankers.
rolleicanon 2 years ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
Off with their heads.
ROFL !
helmuthoorn 2 years ago
Est-ce l'attaque des Tuilleries ?
tipitjo 3 years ago
non, Versailles Octobre 1789
astrasburgo 3 years ago
D'accord,
Merci
tipitjo 3 years ago
I had an old French Columbia LP and this track was on it, but I always wondered what it was about. Now I know! Thankyou so much.
DougNederland 3 years ago
My full gratefullness to the french people for their first democracy in europe!
Panzergredi 3 years ago 6
Vive la République et à mort les ennemis de la République, notre France républicaine bien-aimée!
dgservantie 3 years ago 19
This comment has received too many negative votes show
VA TE FAIRE BUTER DU CON
88marquis 2 years ago
Absolutely fantastic!
Raccoons31 3 years ago 7
Absolutely divine! This is sung with such conviction.
fairjilt1640 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
La république et la France sont 2 choses différentes, voir contradictoires!
Ne comptez pas sur moi pour défendre la 1ère!
HautBreton 3 years ago
Edith!!!!!!!!!!! I adore HER!!!!!!
piafedith 3 years ago 3
vive l'egalité, vive la République, vive la France! un italien
jacmassa 3 years ago 23
Viva La Revolution! Pologne grace vous pour Napoleon!
wiesiekspoks 1 year ago
@jacmassa
W la Nation Socialiste!
ganlesat 10 months ago