Physicist Steven E. Jones shows overunity circuit and measurements (2 of 2)

[iradjnahal]

Dr. Steven , VERY FINE JOB , however , scopes do not lie , but they don't tell the truth either spacially in LCR circuits,, please be very carefull when using scope for measurments in a resonating circuites with coils and a capacitors . to claim over unity you must be able to charge a battery ( not a capacitor ) from out put in a given time and compare it with real input consumption , then you will have the proof . thanks

[Max75572]

This is a good video about overunity circuit and measurements.

If you want to get the over-unity magnetic generator

Just goto Google, search for "Top Magnetic Generator" ...

Click the First Result (Skip the Advertisements)

[josephortizgarcia]

Mr. Jones, please stay on 911. No disrepect, but everything else is bullshit! I love you, my brother! Hotep.

[Wavefront101]

Stiffler exciter sitting on the table @ 4:29. :)

[Nabo00o]

So many have already mentioned this and I do not yet fully understand it, but impedance matching will be very important in these devices. This is also exactly what he is doing when he artificially controls the output and input resistance.

[briddle2]

Every over unity, zero point, etc device I've seen has been someway stopped since I started looking about 3 years ago. Most all if not all have said it's just around the corner or by this time next year etc Is there some plan to be open on the net and still have progress without threat of outside interests trying to thwart a real solution? My 2 cents is to stop talking about it until it's all there and have lots of people post it at the same time.

[AlienEntity1]

I'm not an electrical engineer so I can't make a direct analysis of this 'overunity circuit'. But based on some research I've been doing, the best starting point to test Jones' circuit would be to replace the batteries with a capacitor - some have suggested building another circuit to charge the capacitor and then shut off the power to it, letting the isolated circuit self-power as long as it can.

If it indeed is producing overunity it should run indefinitely. If not, it ain't overunity.

[jbignes5]

You should be commended for showing the results that we all know is there. The problem is understanding what potentials are and how they are actually separate from the current aspect. Potentials cause flow. When you use two potentials separated by any distance without current you can manifest a flow between the two potentials which translates into a flow. The problem then is how to harvest that flow without disturbing the source potential.

[Astrodicted]

@Texmurphy51

Many have replicated Bedini's "toys" and you arnt 1 of them.

[erkq]

You know... you don't even need this fancy Tektronix 'scope he doesn't even have. Just get a good PC based 'scope and a computer can integrate in an instant. What is it about this deity, Tektronix, that's so special? Just more of the snow job.

[WhiteJedi86]

even if he has some bad issuses maybe with cold fusion, its in the past, ive seen this circuit before for like a year now, from romania from a guy called johnyaum he has 2 videos on youtube he shows this in conjunction with a capacitor and 3 reghargable batteries and 2 led s its called infinite lighter charger because it light up the lights for ever and the battery only get full until they explode, no discharge,i am encouraged to consider that it works

[deenie1219]

Thank you Steve and Stirling for the video. Steve is in his teacher mode and makes things as clear as possible.

[Texmurphy51]

This is a measurement error. If this is truly overunity he only needs to feed the output power into the input of the circuit and the circuit should run with no battery input.

If he actually believes this then he is an idiot. Why would you scale this up before you get the little circuit to run first?

[erkq]

@Texmurphy51 This is exactly right. This presentation is long on irrelevant information and short (to the point of 0, really) on relevant facts. It is a classic snow job. The stupid integrating 'scope doesn't matter a hill of beans, he's just trying to impress the ignorant. Just hook the output to the input, remove the battery, see how long the LED shines and be done with it! It'll be done quickly, I guarantee it!

[Texmurphy51]

@erkq I dont know if this guy is fooling himself or just wants publicity.

Perhaps he will try to sell experimental kits like Bedini or some of the other Free Energy creators do to make money.

I think some of these guys Believe that if they just keep tweaking their machine it will work someday.

[shimondoodkin]

looks like it is something with freewheeling of coils

[kratchouf]

energy is the time integral of power. not the moving arythmetic mean reading from your oscilloscope asshole.

[getreal155]

Very nice. The " make it available to humanity" part will probably the most challenging.

[MrAbsoluteknowledge]

upscale it fak the principle

make a working device

and sell it on ebay got damit

[RussellTuan]

joule thief circuit make low voltage battery into higher voltage to keep LED lit longer,it's working principle base on a fly back transformer,if you were here on Youtube long enough you know what fly back and a transistor could do.don't try to fool us youtuber around with such simple circuit.BTW MEASURE POWER USE POWER METER.DO NOT SAY AVERAGE OR MEAN THAT IS OSCILLOSCOPE TREAT SIGNAL WAY TERMS.AT LEAST U SHOULD SAY INTEGRAL BUT THAT IS WRONG STILL.

[4pharaoh]

He never mentions phase relationships. Why? It is very important.

Voltage X current is power only when in phase, when out of phase the result is Volt-Amps-Reactive.

It is certainly easier to believe that the scopes are in error, (since this most important fact is ignored) than it is to believe that there is over unity.

Since this is a scientist, I suspect he is doing a different kind of study. He wants to find out how gullible we are.

[deenie1219]

@4pharaoh Good point wrt phase relationship of volts and amps. I don't think he is trying to deceive us. He is a physicist so I am sure he knows about impedance versus resistance.

[uawwildbob]

he may have been one of the many that had fallin for the dissiformation of the cold fusion results. . but this is another story . this may be obsolete before he wakes up tomorrow. be cause cold fusion is back and will make this worthless. Just look up the Andrea Rossi device

[deenie1219]

@uawwildbob Mos def not worthless with Rossi's device on the market. This method is more suitable for homes and is a lot more cheaper, afaik.

[uawwildbob]

@deenie1219 I cant argue with ya except for the fact that this is still on the bench and a long way off from production .If ya can get a ten KW gen going in the next few months I will yell at the top of my lungs, THANK YOU

[WizzleThump]

STEVEN E. JONES, FAMOUS FOR 2 THINGS. KILLING COLD FUSION IN THE 80'S AND BEING THE ONLY SCIENTIST WITH "TRADE CENTER" DUST WHICH HAS THERMITE IN IT.

ANYTHING THIS GUY TOUCHES IS BIG TIME DISINFO!!!

[PESNetwork]

@WizzleThump You're the one sounding like a disinfo guy. There are 1500 Engineers who have signed the 9/11 Truth petition who are convinced that those buildings were brought down by demolition charges.

[WizzleThump]

@PESNetwork I believe they were taken down by demolition charges as well. However this guy has spread disinfo in 2 MAJOR events in the past decades. Both becoming the laughing stock of the media and scientific community if you still believe it. Anything attached to this guy's name is fishy. Especially since he almost single handily made cold fusion a laughing stock in the 80's when it's being proven now by even NAVY laboratories.

[jum401]

@PESNetwork is that so? did dr judy wood sign too?

[Texmurphy51]

@PESNetwork Thats "architectural and engineering professionals " NOT all Engineers or even what kind of engineers they are.

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth doesnt really do a background check.

You just have to claim you an Engineer to be counted as one from what I see.

[Junk4Q2]

@Texmurphy51 When I joined I provided my engineers license info. I don't remember if it was required but I remember giving it because I believe what they are doing is a good thing. I cannot explain how the buildings fell they way they did but I am sure they didn't fall they way the news and government told the public (there is no proof or possibility of that).

[Texmurphy51]

@Junk4Q2 There is no mystery. The fires weakend a section of the building that failed, the huge weight of the floors above came down and collapsed each floor beneath it, which added to the downward momentum.

What does that have to do with the Free Energy claim of this video?