John McCain is the only serious candidate who can win the war on terror, or the war against terrorists as it really stands. John McCain is a most noble man who has what it takes to stop the terrorists from suffocating freedom, justice and truth in our world.
or maybe 3 or more. but the point is, WHY is YT not including legitimate candidates who are in fact still running? i mean, how many buttons does a person have to push to include or disclude (itaw?) them?
Steve, I know I mostly rant against your employer, but here's another observation. YouTube was an astounding breakthrough in communications. The shock waves are still spreading. So why aren't discussions like this more popular? You did a very nice job analyzing the candidates on your last two videos. But why so little feedback? I'm more worried about this country now than when I started my site. I would be curious as to your observations.
Steve, are you secure enough in your position to review YouTube's own handling of the candidates? Do you agree with Google's removing candidates from YouChoose even if they're still candidates? They do that in Iran and we consider it undemocratic.
Ever since woman started the work place they have been treated as a second class citizen, earning only 0.80 cent cents to the dollar, while men earned $ 1.00
For 219 years this country has been ruled by men, now woman have a chance to finally change this unfair treatment. Why would any woman vote for a guy again and again and again?
If woman are that ignorant then they deserve only 0.50 cent to the dollar.
Figures that YouTube would, once again, change the format of 'searches' with recent removal of refining search by the number of views! Right when Steve tries to show anyone other than Ron Paul with million views.
Exactly. You will also see in his subscriptions he does NOT have anything of the Ron Paul campaign, while Paul owned the internet and had on average higher viewers than the other candidates. So much for a so called "neutral" director.
News for all: Ron Paul will still continue to be dominant on youtube, regardless what happens, unless the new administrations censors the internet, which they can do with the Patriot Act.
its great to provide insight in to what is going on, but if this is all that is going on with YT and politics, america is certainly NOT the greatest place on earth.
Great job! This has truly given a forum for all of the candidates to use as they choose. Lots of hard work by all of you. I Applaud the whole team. It has been an exciting 1 1/2 years. It has probably made all of us get more involved. I went to my first caucus (That is why I did the new Voting video- Hats off to Why Tuesday) and I made stump calls for McCain. The Involvement has sure fed the brain.
I find that youtube is just as bias as the liberal media it shows you that the left is as socialist as they come
bigguy1700 3 years ago
Won't be fair to all candidates? Then don't expect many viewers...
Fidokrab 3 years ago
John McCain is the only serious candidate who can win the war on terror, or the war against terrorists as it really stands. John McCain is a most noble man who has what it takes to stop the terrorists from suffocating freedom, justice and truth in our world.
John McCain 08!
richardrichard07 3 years ago
The war hero John McCain would make a most excellent President, if he does not then that is America out of business.
John McCain is the American President all intelligent and sane people have been waiting for.
John McCain truly is up there with George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, JFK and Ronald Reagan.
richardrichard07 3 years ago
The illusion of control is dangerous.
SamHarrisCOM 3 years ago 2
Put Mike Gravel, Ron Paul back on and Add Ralph Nader & we maybe able to take you seriously.
For now....well I think you know
willtrib 3 years ago 4
america's best candidates are NOT being represented on YouTube.
IF YouTube has become a sellout to corporate media, the number of users will sink your ship, and faster than you can imagine.
you better act fast YT or you will be out of business in less than 2 months.
eligarf 3 years ago 3
or maybe 3 or more. but the point is, WHY is YT not including legitimate candidates who are in fact still running? i mean, how many buttons does a person have to push to include or disclude (itaw?) them?
YouChooShitube or the truth?
put them back, please!
eligarf 3 years ago 2
Steve, I know I mostly rant against your employer, but here's another observation. YouTube was an astounding breakthrough in communications. The shock waves are still spreading. So why aren't discussions like this more popular? You did a very nice job analyzing the candidates on your last two videos. But why so little feedback? I'm more worried about this country now than when I started my site. I would be curious as to your observations.
gary
gdstark 3 years ago
Steve, are you secure enough in your position to review YouTube's own handling of the candidates? Do you agree with Google's removing candidates from YouChoose even if they're still candidates? They do that in Iran and we consider it undemocratic.
gary
gdstark 3 years ago 4
Put Mike Gravel, Ron Paul back on and Add Ralph Nader to the race...
3SM3x 3 years ago 7
¥T
MISTAFIEDONEEIGHTSEV 3 years ago
Politics
First chance for woman --- don't throw it way.
Ever since woman started the work place they have been treated as a second class citizen, earning only 0.80 cent cents to the dollar, while men earned $ 1.00
For 219 years this country has been ruled by men, now woman have a chance to finally change this unfair treatment. Why would any woman vote for a guy again and again and again?
If woman are that ignorant then they deserve only 0.50 cent to the dollar.
ZZMercedesZZ 3 years ago
Figures that YouTube would, once again, change the format of 'searches' with recent removal of refining search by the number of views! Right when Steve tries to show anyone other than Ron Paul with million views.
Ha! BUSTED.
This video is a huge YAWN
anyusmoon1 3 years ago 2
Exactly. You will also see in his subscriptions he does NOT have anything of the Ron Paul campaign, while Paul owned the internet and had on average higher viewers than the other candidates. So much for a so called "neutral" director.
News for all: Ron Paul will still continue to be dominant on youtube, regardless what happens, unless the new administrations censors the internet, which they can do with the Patriot Act.
vryheid88 3 years ago 2
Ouch! Steve et al at YouTube, that one had to HURT- as truth often does.
YouTube 'Choose'n For Ya' has not been very effective since 'they' ditched truth via distorting Ron-Paul-reality.
Ya think it's sunk into Steves head yet why his vids no longer acheive the high ratings?
anyusmoon1 3 years ago
not even that good.
its great to provide insight in to what is going on, but if this is all that is going on with YT and politics, america is certainly NOT the greatest place on earth.
how sad, this is the best america can do?
and funny, not!
put back the real candidates!
eligarf 3 years ago 2
I liked it
010Adrian010 3 years ago
great recap, great hair
theDHC 3 years ago
Great job! This has truly given a forum for all of the candidates to use as they choose. Lots of hard work by all of you. I Applaud the whole team. It has been an exciting 1 1/2 years. It has probably made all of us get more involved. I went to my first caucus (That is why I did the new Voting video- Hats off to Why Tuesday) and I made stump calls for McCain. The Involvement has sure fed the brain.
SparklestheClown 3 years ago