To me it sounds weird that the energy of a photon would decrease over time since it gets stretched. I mean the number of wavelengths and their corresponding amplitudes are preserved right? If a photon's energy was proportional to the wavelength wouldn't it gain energy upon entering a medium with higher refractive index, thus violate the conservation of energy law?
But then again, I'm altogeather uncomfortable with quantum mechanics.
Is it possible that the supermassive Black hole and the scattering of black holes within a galaxy create a galaxy-radial disruption in the space-time fabric which causes dark matter to clump around galaxies since dark matter is weakly-interacting?
The expansion of the universe seems a lot like osmotic pressure and thermodynamics. If the ionization layers out in the very distance universe are semi-permeable, and/or the neutrino threshold is semi-permeable, then maybe the expansion is not from within. Think of a tiny sphere or "cell" in an ocean of "universe stuff", perhaps dark matter, and that tiny sphere hits a thermal source (an ocean vent) and rapidly expands, accelerating the osmosis of dark matter, but then cooling and slowing down.
With a History background, as a mere lecturer, I am often lost in calculus and general mathematics. But to 'see' Dr. Susskind explain these basic formulae and expressions of physics is a true joy.
I may have to watch this a few times to comfortably follow the progression, but one can not help but admire his humor and passion to instruct what is surely rudimentary to his vast knowledge.
it is unbelievable and beautiful regardless of the content that information of this mass let along magnitude is offered in my generation at the cost of internet access i Thank Whole heatedly stanford ucla any of the other universities which provide this intriguing content to those who thirst for knowledge
@joethepro3 oh i don't know, I think it would nice up there on the mantle between my childhood sport's trophies and my world's greatest dad mug even if purely decorative.
""TO ALL PEOPLE WHO ARE READING THIS : DOSE THE ELECTRICITY OF BRAIN CAN BE HACKED VIA SOME TECHNOLOGY? Can ANY Microwaves or ELF Waves Manipulate the Electricity of the brain?
My Clear Question : Do some people Reading OUR MINDS And manipulating our subconscious regions of mind-brain via having the electricity of our brain in thier computers?
Ofcourse he is brilliant..He is a professor n have a ph.D in theoretical physics.. He is one of the Godfather of string theory...In fact I was predicting he would be awarded Noble Prize this year for Physics.
@raayinrahman I doubt string theorists will be getting Nobel prizes anytime soon. Guys like Susskind are likely to win the Fields medal or Abel prize, however. Some may say the Fields medal is better than the Nobel prize since it's the top award in mathematics which is the purest field.
If the expansion of the universe causes photons' wavelengths to increase, can't this explain the redshift associated with photons that took longer to reach us? (Without having to invoke the idea that the further objects are receding from us with greater (or any) velocity))
Wait a minute... it's the same thing! He's just blowing my mind: EVERY point in the universe is "the edge" of the universe-- so the universe's expansion causes the wavelength of a photon that connects any two points to increase. The red shift is just a boundary condition.
@unemployedfreak I don't understand what you mean with "every pion in the universe is "the edge". The expansion is everywhere, of course at the large scales!
@unemployedfreak Well what happens is that we do have a combination of facts. Because of the receding the wavelength is red-shifted then during the time the photon is traveling to reach us the space expands and adds of the wave length shift. That is the reason that distant galaxies are much dimmer than you would normally expect .
When constructing the FRW equation he uses a sphere of radius 'a' and gets a 4/3*pi*a**3. However, when determining the energy density 'rho' he uses a unit cube to give M/a**3. Why a cube and not a sphere? A sphere would lead to rho being 3*M/4*pi*a**3. The FRW would then reduce to 2*M*g/a**3 - k/a**2
Well he could have done that, but the basic law would still be the same, a const/a**3 ...so only constant would change, and that is not very important, u can have it both ways..it's a matter of personal preference.
Thanks, I just wondered since the sphere method gets rid of the pi elements which just seem to complicate the "look" of the equations not necessarily the result (as you said it only changes the constant portion). Keeping pi around for use in substituting elsewhere because it probably gets cancelled out when simplifying other equations.
thanks a lot)
MrOlenevod 1 month ago
Crazy Susskind! Always making up words :D
aqouby 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thanks for this lecture! thanks Stanford!
adelle0001 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
galing ng video!
grunder20 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dark Matter is Blackholes of a mass of 10 to the 25th power grams. Lots of them like 10 to the 40th power of them.
CaptainImpedance 2 months ago
Dark Matter is Blackholes of a mass of 10 to the 25th power grams. Lots of them like 10 to the 40th power of them.
CaptainImpedance 2 months ago
Oh. How I love this lecture. Very interesting!
agapitoflores001 2 months ago
Hahahaha at "hyperbolic noogie function"
DanielARochester 2 months ago
sorry, what word does he say when he talks adout the sun - hot and opek(g)????
MrOlenevod 3 months ago
@MrOlenevod Opaque .. opposite of transparent, i.e. you can't see through it.
BagarozziBoi 1 month ago in playlist Course | Modern Physics: Cosmology
To me it sounds weird that the energy of a photon would decrease over time since it gets stretched. I mean the number of wavelengths and their corresponding amplitudes are preserved right? If a photon's energy was proportional to the wavelength wouldn't it gain energy upon entering a medium with higher refractive index, thus violate the conservation of energy law?
But then again, I'm altogeather uncomfortable with quantum mechanics.
TheLivirus 7 months ago
Is it possible that the supermassive Black hole and the scattering of black holes within a galaxy create a galaxy-radial disruption in the space-time fabric which causes dark matter to clump around galaxies since dark matter is weakly-interacting?
JAMAC08 9 months ago
Is the velocities of the outer matter in a galaxy relativistic? If so, wouldn't this play an important role when determining the mass of a galaxy?
TheLivirus 7 months ago
Not degrees, Kelvin. 3K, 3000K
mjkr1988 9 months ago
Those damned white board markers, I have the same trouble, Leonard...
SinclairNicholas 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Real profiles and thousands of Russain women gettop5.info
FlemingAldridge 1 year ago
Leonard Susskind: The body of Sly Stallone, and the Brain of Einstein.
colin0630 1 year ago
@colin0630 and the hair of a monk.
1isaacmusic 5 months ago
The expansion of the universe seems a lot like osmotic pressure and thermodynamics. If the ionization layers out in the very distance universe are semi-permeable, and/or the neutrino threshold is semi-permeable, then maybe the expansion is not from within. Think of a tiny sphere or "cell" in an ocean of "universe stuff", perhaps dark matter, and that tiny sphere hits a thermal source (an ocean vent) and rapidly expands, accelerating the osmosis of dark matter, but then cooling and slowing down.
dmkramerica 1 year ago
Comment removed
dmkramerica 1 year ago
This man he could teach even a rusty nail physics...lol.
TrollDicked 1 year ago 2
With a History background, as a mere lecturer, I am often lost in calculus and general mathematics. But to 'see' Dr. Susskind explain these basic formulae and expressions of physics is a true joy.
I may have to watch this a few times to comfortably follow the progression, but one can not help but admire his humor and passion to instruct what is surely rudimentary to his vast knowledge.
He doesn't -have- to do this... but he does.
Wonderful!
Big thanks to Stanford for providing this.
OneWorldHistory 1 year ago 6
1:22:57 there i can stop losing my damned spot
bunkmasterflex 1 year ago
it is unbelievable and beautiful regardless of the content that information of this mass let along magnitude is offered in my generation at the cost of internet access i Thank Whole heatedly stanford ucla any of the other universities which provide this intriguing content to those who thirst for knowledge
bunkmasterflex 1 year ago
If i were him, all i would seek is respect in the minds of those i taught to continue in this feild of knowledge. Brilliant.
No nobel prize would fashion a wanting with this amount of illustrous brain activity! ; )
Peace
joethepro3 1 year ago
@joethepro3 oh i don't know, I think it would nice up there on the mantle between my childhood sport's trophies and my world's greatest dad mug even if purely decorative.
bunkmasterflex 1 year ago
@bunkmasterflex
Hahaha yeah, maybe my friend. Though, im very sure that worlds greatest dad is much more important in your eyes ; )
Peace
joethepro3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
""TO ALL PEOPLE WHO ARE READING THIS : DOSE THE ELECTRICITY OF BRAIN CAN BE HACKED VIA SOME TECHNOLOGY? Can ANY Microwaves or ELF Waves Manipulate the Electricity of the brain?
My Clear Question : Do some people Reading OUR MINDS And manipulating our subconscious regions of mind-brain via having the electricity of our brain in thier computers?
I hope for search, curiosity.
mrelectron111 2 years ago
Ofcourse he is brilliant..He is a professor n have a ph.D in theoretical physics.. He is one of the Godfather of string theory...In fact I was predicting he would be awarded Noble Prize this year for Physics.
raayinrahman 2 years ago
@raayinrahman I doubt string theorists will be getting Nobel prizes anytime soon. Guys like Susskind are likely to win the Fields medal or Abel prize, however. Some may say the Fields medal is better than the Nobel prize since it's the top award in mathematics which is the purest field.
Pastafarealist 1 year ago
Susskind is brilliant. Is he Ph.D in physics?
sidexwalk 2 years ago
@sidexwalk I'm pretty sure most, if not all, physics lecturers in youtube videos have Ph.Ds.
Pastafarealist 1 year ago
If the expansion of the universe causes photons' wavelengths to increase, can't this explain the redshift associated with photons that took longer to reach us? (Without having to invoke the idea that the further objects are receding from us with greater (or any) velocity))
unemployedfreak 2 years ago
Wait a minute... it's the same thing! He's just blowing my mind: EVERY point in the universe is "the edge" of the universe-- so the universe's expansion causes the wavelength of a photon that connects any two points to increase. The red shift is just a boundary condition.
unemployedfreak 2 years ago
Very astutely deduced.
sidexwalk 2 years ago
@unemployedfreak I don't understand what you mean with "every pion in the universe is "the edge". The expansion is everywhere, of course at the large scales!
joerondan 1 year ago
@unemployedfreak Well what happens is that we do have a combination of facts. Because of the receding the wavelength is red-shifted then during the time the photon is traveling to reach us the space expands and adds of the wave length shift. That is the reason that distant galaxies are much dimmer than you would normally expect .
joerondan 1 year ago
@joerondan
frenkhuijzen 1 year ago
I Thank for these lectures to the Stanford University!!!
gausstein 2 years ago 16
When constructing the FRW equation he uses a sphere of radius 'a' and gets a 4/3*pi*a**3. However, when determining the energy density 'rho' he uses a unit cube to give M/a**3. Why a cube and not a sphere? A sphere would lead to rho being 3*M/4*pi*a**3. The FRW would then reduce to 2*M*g/a**3 - k/a**2
BrunswickHeadsHotel 2 years ago
Well he could have done that, but the basic law would still be the same, a const/a**3 ...so only constant would change, and that is not very important, u can have it both ways..it's a matter of personal preference.
llana36 2 years ago
Thanks, I just wondered since the sphere method gets rid of the pi elements which just seem to complicate the "look" of the equations not necessarily the result (as you said it only changes the constant portion). Keeping pi around for use in substituting elsewhere because it probably gets cancelled out when simplifying other equations.
BrunswickHeadsHotel 2 years ago
meso confused i like his voice and the small amount i can understand
keggerous 2 years ago 3
Cosmology isnt too bad, the prticle physics and QCD theory get pretty cool.
Silentsam7532 2 years ago 2
i need a brain upgrade
2020bane 2 years ago 15
Comment removed
bunkmasterflex 1 year ago