e.g. please evolutionists show one fossil that shows a land animal with really long fingers like bats have and had in earliest times? go investigate it instead of talkin about them.see fossil records.bats just come into existance as bats in fossil records.species changes but common ancesstor can never be found in anywhere.i gave an exact example about bats (its same for birds u can look for it) sorry for my english but im telling the truth and calling u to search for real transitional fossils
i was evolutionist until i searched for first flying animals.absolutely there is no good fossil to show remarkable link between land animals and flying animals.then i realised that there wasnt real transitional fossil at all.
2:00 -- We're just 2 minutes into the video and already Patton gets caught up in despicable quote-mining, a creationist technique where they take a scientist's words and pull them out of context to make them imply something totally different from what the scientist meant. Furthermore, this quote is from 1981, before anything was known about phylogenetics and the extensive molecular record of common ancestry.
The best YouTube videos on the topics like this you can find in my channel's playlist Creation vs Evolution. Click on "more info" about that playlist, and God bless you.
Interesting how creationists get all excited about the cambrian exlosion, yet none of those fossils creatures are found in Genesis. All we find in one day is all *kinds* of animals, far more complex than the cambrian animals, appearing out of nowhere. God-did-it once again. Show us a mammal from the cambrian, then we can talk.
@LordSauceness really? what about the flood of Noah in Genesis? the reason why we find so many fossils is because of the flood.and what about the trilobites, plus many, many other complex species.all fossils we find to day is because the rapid burl of fossils all over the world.this video heaved anwser your questions ''by the way''' dont understand people make arguments against the video if the video explained it already.
but then all fossils will be allocated in the ground randomly. But they are not. More primitive fossils are always deeper in older layers of rock. Never found a human or a bear in, a for example, a jurassic strata? Besides, how did Noah fit all those animals from around the world on one boat? We're talking millions of species and some might have eaten each other on the boat. And two of each kind... who did the offsprings reproduce with? Noah story is such madeup bullshit.
As an Athiest, my hats off to your calm, non-threatening demeanor is refreshing. Its refreshing to have an opposing standpoint presented in a way that actually makes me think. Just as my theories will not sway your standpoint, yours cannot sway mine, but I applaud your presentation of your argument.
Goto (Google It) GoodScienceForYou Neutral Evolution Forum and learn how to learn, without beliefs forced on you. Also listen to some good Blues from my band HavenHead. Evolution is not in any evidence.
there is not 1.. not ONE fossil that shows a half chimp half human transition, Darwin stated before his death that if we do not find hundreds of thousands of these fossils that indicate a change from one species into another, my theory is wrong!.. please dont bring up Lucy, that was just so pathetic.. stop feeding into evolution my friend, and this has nothing to do with religion, i say this to you because you believe in a false theory!
@JusJuiceIt There are 250,000 plus published(in main stream scientific journals), peer reviewed(in main stream scientific journals) scientific papers on evolution, in the past 150 years. Yet you say you can disprove the theorum. Please post the published (main stream scientific journal), peer reviewed (main stream scientific journal) paper that does.
@JusJuiceIt Please explain how Chimpanzees and Bonobos share 96% of DNA with humans--you won't see a half human half chimpanzee because they developed at the same time, fool. So much for your knowledge of science, which is clearly nonexistent, very much like goodscience for you who is incapable of virtually anything rational. BTW the flood was shown to be mathematically impossible (see 'Noah's Flood-Mathematically Impossible' as was YEC-see 'Mathematic Disproof of YEC'). Hopeless.
"Please explain how Chimpanzees and Bonobos share 96% of DNA with humans".... heres a peer-reviewed source showing that the difference in DNA between us and the chimp is 23%.. our DNA is not 96% the same, its 77%
"fool"..."so much for your knowledge of science, which is clearly non existent" lol well first of all, thats not very nice, and secondly, didnt i just prove your statistics wrong? lol
in response to your last little part, im not a yec, i believe in old earth....cont
but thats besides the point.. and i can site you thirty sources right now showing how the flood is not mathematically impossible.. but i really do care less! and itll be a waste of my valuable time!
oh and that link will be posted in your personal message, i cant post here on this.
@JusJuiceIt No, you can't cite any sources proving the mathematic proof is incorrect, and your link is very nice evidence confirming evolution, disproves the half-human, half-chimpanzee idea, and has nothing to do with the flood. Nice work.
I personaly don't believe in religion, but I will say that Charles Darwins theory of evolution is what it says it is. It is a theory. Too many people have taken that as fact, and stopped their research. We need to look at it as a theory, and test as a theory should be tested. If it is not according to nature, we can come up with another theory, test that one, and so on, and so on until we find the fact.
Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
@EnderGate Well quoted. Very relevant. Evolution is an assumption that kills any semblance of humility about where we came from (isn't the mysteriousness about life what makes it so beautiful?).
The wise man know himself to be a fool. The fool claims himself to be wise.
e.g. please evolutionists show one fossil that shows a land animal with really long fingers like bats have and had in earliest times? go investigate it instead of talkin about them.see fossil records.bats just come into existance as bats in fossil records.species changes but common ancesstor can never be found in anywhere.i gave an exact example about bats (its same for birds u can look for it) sorry for my english but im telling the truth and calling u to search for real transitional fossils
esraretin 2 weeks ago
i was evolutionist until i searched for first flying animals.absolutely there is no good fossil to show remarkable link between land animals and flying animals.then i realised that there wasnt real transitional fossil at all.
esraretin 2 weeks ago
2:00 -- We're just 2 minutes into the video and already Patton gets caught up in despicable quote-mining, a creationist technique where they take a scientist's words and pull them out of context to make them imply something totally different from what the scientist meant. Furthermore, this quote is from 1981, before anything was known about phylogenetics and the extensive molecular record of common ancestry.
maxhardcase 3 months ago
@maxhardcase
Stop making up excuses you twat! I am sure this mans brain is much more open then yours mate.
hudfadz 1 month ago
PHD in Christian Education from Pacific Collage of Graduate Studies (Luther Rice University).
This school is not accredited or authorized by any regional or national body to grant degrees.
In other words, he has no Doctorate. He has no training in the Paleontology or Biological or Geological fields.
wizard970 4 months ago
The best YouTube videos on the topics like this you can find in my channel's playlist Creation vs Evolution. Click on "more info" about that playlist, and God bless you.
mikilavush 8 months ago
Interesting how creationists get all excited about the cambrian exlosion, yet none of those fossils creatures are found in Genesis. All we find in one day is all *kinds* of animals, far more complex than the cambrian animals, appearing out of nowhere. God-did-it once again. Show us a mammal from the cambrian, then we can talk.
LordSauceness 10 months ago
@LordSauceness really? what about the flood of Noah in Genesis? the reason why we find so many fossils is because of the flood.and what about the trilobites, plus many, many other complex species.all fossils we find to day is because the rapid burl of fossils all over the world.this video heaved anwser your questions ''by the way''' dont understand people make arguments against the video if the video explained it already.
jesusLostChildren777 10 months ago
@jesusLostChildren777
but then all fossils will be allocated in the ground randomly. But they are not. More primitive fossils are always deeper in older layers of rock. Never found a human or a bear in, a for example, a jurassic strata? Besides, how did Noah fit all those animals from around the world on one boat? We're talking millions of species and some might have eaten each other on the boat. And two of each kind... who did the offsprings reproduce with? Noah story is such madeup bullshit.
OptimalElement 4 months ago
As an Athiest, my hats off to your calm, non-threatening demeanor is refreshing. Its refreshing to have an opposing standpoint presented in a way that actually makes me think. Just as my theories will not sway your standpoint, yours cannot sway mine, but I applaud your presentation of your argument.
sethshadowbane 10 months ago
Goto (Google It) GoodScienceForYou Neutral Evolution Forum and learn how to learn, without beliefs forced on you. Also listen to some good Blues from my band HavenHead. Evolution is not in any evidence.
GoodScienceForYou 11 months ago
@mrz1988
there is not 1.. not ONE fossil that shows a half chimp half human transition, Darwin stated before his death that if we do not find hundreds of thousands of these fossils that indicate a change from one species into another, my theory is wrong!.. please dont bring up Lucy, that was just so pathetic.. stop feeding into evolution my friend, and this has nothing to do with religion, i say this to you because you believe in a false theory!
JusJuiceIt 1 year ago
@JusJuiceIt There are 250,000 plus published(in main stream scientific journals), peer reviewed(in main stream scientific journals) scientific papers on evolution, in the past 150 years. Yet you say you can disprove the theorum. Please post the published (main stream scientific journal), peer reviewed (main stream scientific journal) paper that does.
wizard970 4 months ago
@JusJuiceIt Please explain how Chimpanzees and Bonobos share 96% of DNA with humans--you won't see a half human half chimpanzee because they developed at the same time, fool. So much for your knowledge of science, which is clearly nonexistent, very much like goodscience for you who is incapable of virtually anything rational. BTW the flood was shown to be mathematically impossible (see 'Noah's Flood-Mathematically Impossible' as was YEC-see 'Mathematic Disproof of YEC'). Hopeless.
Atalatl 4 months ago
@Atalatl
"Please explain how Chimpanzees and Bonobos share 96% of DNA with humans".... heres a peer-reviewed source showing that the difference in DNA between us and the chimp is 23%.. our DNA is not 96% the same, its 77%
"fool"..."so much for your knowledge of science, which is clearly non existent" lol well first of all, thats not very nice, and secondly, didnt i just prove your statistics wrong? lol
in response to your last little part, im not a yec, i believe in old earth....cont
JusJuiceIt 4 months ago
@Atalatl
but thats besides the point.. and i can site you thirty sources right now showing how the flood is not mathematically impossible.. but i really do care less! and itll be a waste of my valuable time!
oh and that link will be posted in your personal message, i cant post here on this.
JusJuiceIt 4 months ago
@JusJuiceIt No, you can't cite any sources proving the mathematic proof is incorrect, and your link is very nice evidence confirming evolution, disproves the half-human, half-chimpanzee idea, and has nothing to do with the flood. Nice work.
Atalatl 4 months ago
I personaly don't believe in religion, but I will say that Charles Darwins theory of evolution is what it says it is. It is a theory. Too many people have taken that as fact, and stopped their research. We need to look at it as a theory, and test as a theory should be tested. If it is not according to nature, we can come up with another theory, test that one, and so on, and so on until we find the fact.
blackerthanebony100 1 year ago
@blackerthanebony100
The problem with your statement is that in science, the word "theory" has a lot more weight than you think.
Gravity is also called a theory. Theory basically means fact in science. If you want to call evolution what it is, call it a hypothesis.
smporter88 7 months ago
@mrz1988 exactly, all bullshit, except that micro evolution has been observed !!
buschmann69 1 year ago
@buschmann69
Your polite tone, presentation of evidence, and use of reasoned logic have convinced me of your position! Congratulations!
FiverBeyond 1 year ago 7
very nice!!!
ninnzbinnz 3 years ago 8
Excellent information. Patton is a powerhouse.
NephilimFree 3 years ago 13
Agreed Neph its a great video.
5 star!
I love the Trilobite eye. Maybe I can get a video out of that. :)
Andrewkinghorn15 3 years ago 19
Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
EnderGate 3 years ago 24
@EnderGate Well quoted. Very relevant. Evolution is an assumption that kills any semblance of humility about where we came from (isn't the mysteriousness about life what makes it so beautiful?).
The wise man know himself to be a fool. The fool claims himself to be wise.
tpstrat14 8 months ago
@EnderGate well said.
MagnusCattus 4 months ago
very disturbing...
pikechris1 3 years ago 18
i do not believe children are taught what empirical means in american schools...it is a conspiracy
1MSNARA 3 years ago 17