Amazing it it hit an exact shaped hole with deadly accuracy isnt it?
Amazing the intense heat didnt burn the dry grass isnt it?
Amazing the intense fireball and impact that destroyed solid titanium alloy engines somehow left the inevitable terrorists passports totally unscathed along with a terrorist bandana totally unsinged.
Amazing the terrorist repeatedly says "we have a bomb on board"
then the whole plane vanishes in an explosion and nobody even tests for explosives isnt it?
@zenoist2 No, because the hole in the pic is a different mark.
No, because the grass is green and therefore not dry.
No, because there were lots of pieces of debris found of which the ones you describe are just a couple.
No, because they knew hijackers were crashing planes and that the onboard phonecalls,ensuing overheard struggle and the behaviour of the plane as described by those who say it out of normal control then crash into a field would suggest no bombs were present.
Without even covering the rest of the bullshit in this vid, when compared with a number of aerial shots it is clear that nothing in the 94 pic has anything to do with the actual impact zone. So,your definitely no scientist and you maybe are a bit stupid.
408 stupid sheeple suffer from cognitive dissonance..Pff, contemptible insects they are.. like ants at a picnic, consuming pro government slop. lol. Same old trolling tactics being used against new and real evidence. Get some new material and cut the emotional bullshit out like "I dare you to say that to a victims family". What, tell them the truth, sure I'd be glad to :) Us real people are tired of the humiliation of sharing the same species name with you morons.
@s040978 Exactly....the plane was inverted and hit the ground at over 500mph disentigrating. Just like the plane that went down in Florida. Left a small hole and nothing else. You know what happens to soft living tissue when it hits something solid at over 500mph. Poof...splat...into nothing. The plane crashes shown in the video were from low trajectory impacts like during landings. Total idiots believe this crap because they can blame the government for their failed lives and social rejection.
@BadBoriBoy Thats correct, engines dont dissolve into air...thats why they found both engines at the crash site scooter. Along with the black boxes, human remains, passenger and flight attendants ids, documents, papers, red bandanna, small part of the fuselage, etc...
@lcspies Claims - " thats why they found both engines at the crash site"
Really ? Prove that one. Please by all means direct to the link or pictures of these two (2) engines you speak of. Not including the picture of that pc. that fits nicely into the back hoe bucket. The Black boxes ? Again prove they are from said plane by providing the serial numbers to confirm, thank you.
Did they find the magic cell phones too?!?! You know the ones that can make calls to the ground from 20000ft in the air during 9/11/2001.
Use your eyes RETARD!!!! Where are the firemen?!! Why are there people in radioactive suits?!?! It isn't impossible for paper to make it out of a plane crash, but the percentage is about 8% likely hood. Paper is a thin sheet of wood.
@BadBoriBoy Huh Hello? Cellphone calls were possible in 2001...Try consulting experts, not truther sites moron! Radioactive suits at a plane crash? roflmao Research ANY air crash, and see that paper(S) ALWAYS survive after the crash...dipshit! Cash, documents, passports, letters, clothing, id's, etc...Allegheny 853 had cash everywhere, an unfinished letter, and a playing card still being held in the hand of a passengers severed arm/hand! Not very good at this are you scooter?
@lcspies : ROFL. You are worse then RKOwens, & you are going purely of emotion.
Cell phones cold NOT work above 4000ft in 2001. You are fucking brain dead stupid. Every carrier was tested, & they all failed above 4000ft altitude.
It is kind of strange that the official story has impossible outcomes in all 4 scenes of the "attack". None of the 4 are evidence of a real plane crash regardless. I can easily prove that with EXPERIMENT using Newton's Laws of Motion.
@BadBoriBoy lol...well many cell phone experts, CEO's, technicians, etc...from major companies all state that cellphone calls were possible in 2001. Do some research dipshit. Above 4000 ft? total bullshit!! I made cellphone calls from the top of Pikes Peak, at 14,110 ft before 2001, I have also made cellphone calls from my airplane above 4000ft!! 2700 degrees was possible so I dont get the reference about me being wrong, when did i mention temps or Owens?.And you cant prove crap...
@lcspies " ROFL ...I was telling you were wrong about the cell phone calls b/c you were/are. And you were moving at 350mph too right?!?! lmao, what next a Virgin Mary?!?!
Jet fuel CAN NOT reach 2700 dumbass. Are you really that stupid?!?! The event has already been proven impossible from start to finish. NEWTON can't be wrong, RETARD!!!
@BadBoriBoy sorry dumbass, you are wrong...cell phones worked in 2001...confirmed by industry experts on the subject, which trumps your truther bullcrap! The temps in the towers reached 1800-2000 degrees. Flashovers in house/office fires START at 900-1100F degrees and can burn as high as 2000+ depending on material. The possibility of 2700 was in the rubble piles afterward and more than jet fuel was burning dip shit, are YOU that stupid? R-E-S-E-A-R-C-H try it sometime dipstick.
@BadBoriBoy Thermite? You really think thermite was used? OMG!!! Yeah ok you fucking dumbass!! Research aye? and you still believe in the use of thermite? OBVIOUSLY you have not done any research or you would know that thermite would be fucking bullcrap! Not to swift in science are you? Ever burn steel wool? Heard of oxidation or iron burning? If you did you would know how 2700 could be possible to produce molten steel in the rubble piles. Again MORE THAN JET FUEL was burning, Idiot!
You are telling ME to research. I have been a victim of this event. I have been debunking the shit out of it from day 1. It is impossible from start to finish. It is quite the fairy tale as well.
Unless YOU were affected personally from this event, there is no way you have done more research, nor debunked more claims like I have.
@BadBoriBoy Mythbusters could not even cut a car in half with 1/2 ton of thermite...a 1/2 ton! Enough thermite to bring down two 110 story buildings and a 47 story building would be astronomical!! Plus all the crap needed to set it off, hold the thermite in place, etc...None of which was found...thermite! roflmao!! Why not say it was a nuke too...
@BadBoriBoy ROFL...Lets see..."No planes","flying holograms of jets","the planes were cgis","The towers were never there to begin with","nukes were used","thermite","bombs","controlled demolitions","missiles","global hawk","military jets with no windows","directed energy weapons","93 shot down","lasers","Aliens did it","False Flag Operation","Dancing Israelis","Israelis in van full of explosives","Jews stayed home","Mosad","Mysterious Noises from floor 38", cont'...
@BadBoriBoy Cont'... "Elevator upgrades","Pre-planted bombs", "Cheney was in charge of Norad","White Plane","NO fires","space beams", "Breach Kit","No Gravity" Did I miss anything? Shit the list keeps growing! And yet not one shred of evidence to prove your case. Can't wait to see what you idiots dream up next! too funny
@BadBoriBoy Steel wool burning, oxidation, iron burning, materials in the rubble piles from building materials all explain the heat, molten metal or molten steel...thermite is/was not needed...thermite is total bullcrap!
@BadBoriBoy watch?v=PPAYZMzGMwQ&feature=related 1/2 ton could not even cut through a couple pieces of thin aluminum/steel in a car but somehow can burn through thousands of thick steel box beams/I beams? roflmao! yeah sure! Not to mention the amount needed would be to ludicrous to even consider!! Also the violent burn and bright flames from the thermite reaction was never seen or mentioned from fire fighters or people in the buildings. Thermite is bullcrap...period!
@BadBoriBoy "THE GREAT THERMATE DEBATE" thats your "victim" of 9/11 go to research info? Tried any REAL research\investigation on your own? Obviously not!
@lcspies As you know I do not discuss the thermite stuff, BUT this video is impressive and proves a few things. watch -( THERMITE CUTTING STEEL -- EXPERIMENTALLY DEMONSTRATED)
RKOwens will no longer let people comment on his videos b/c he was making fun of Jason Bermus for making claims that FEMA recorded 2700 deg F. @ ground zero.
Not only did FEMA record it, but NASA did as well. RK even posted a thread over it & felt like a complete retard when he found out it was indeed TRUE.
He deleted the Bermus vid, & will no longer allow comments on his BS videos.
@BadBoriBoy hay dum ass yes they would not in to air but when you hit a solid object going 300-500 mph it dose and that dose not include the rate at witch they were falling my dad works for american and yes there were 3 air craft that went down that day excuse me 4 i think i would know my dad did not go to work for 3 days because of this in cedent your a dum ass and a piece of shit if you think the government would cause this you all are dum fuck i wish you were the one how had died that day
Your dad works for American so he knows everything about government cover-ups?
ROFL. If you take the visual evidence of Shanksville & compare it with 10 other plane crashes it says it all. You really need to focus on how to read/write basic English.
Not every part of the engine turns into air RETARD!!! In tenerife it happened to Pan Am, but the engines were left on by the captain who was injured when KLM hit them. You can still see the engines from both planes though, MORON!!!
I would love to see you say that the people who died on that tragic day didn't actually die to the families who lost loved ones! I visited the memorial two days ago and met the wife of the captain!! She is still devastated!! But you being a worthless piece of crap have the balls to say it's not real! They found a piece if the plane last April stuck in a tree! They found enough remains to tell who was who on the plane! The found the booklet that told the al - queada guys how to fly the plane! Yo
If you have ever been to a crash site, up close and personal, you would know the truth and this video would have never been posted....your right, your no scientist !
You're always going to be told that there's a big enemy that poses a big threat Because without one,you wont need THEM to protect you from it ! And you wont pay for their huge military,support their wars or tolerate loss of freedoms in the name of keeping you safe from it.That threat needs to come with examples that can be pointed to as proof the threat is real.What would the defense budget be like today without 911?CIA budget?Would you support the wars if they said they were for control Oil?
flight 93 was headed for congress/whitehouse if it had made it usa would have been able to declare full martial law.i dont really know why 93 was taken out of the loop but b thankful it was makes sense it may have been intended for building 7,and yes they are all contected whole thing like many others were all planned to last detail only thing im suprised about is that the stupid pricks actually managed t pull it off and fool you all..still.how much evidence and specialist info do you need t see
@mamamonster2011 think about it. everything in the white house as well as the white house its self would be destroyed.. they wouldn't want to destroy the white house and moving everything of importance from the white house wouldn't be able to be pulled off without someone noticing so the best thing to do is make it look like the plane couldn't make it to its mark. That's why the only plane that didn't hit was the White House..
What does truthers think about the theory that united 93 was supposed to hit wc7 but since the flight got 5 hours delayed there was a change of plans?
@abvmoose87 flight 93 was not going to hit wtc 7...it was headed for the WH or Capitol building. 7 had no significance in the attacks what so ever and hitting it would be pointless...WTC 1, 2, Pentagon, WH/Capitol were targets for a reason and wtc 7 does not fit into the picture.
@lcspies wtc7 does fit into the picture and there are alot of motives to bring it down but you don't seem to be on to that track so il leave it with that we simply disagree then
@abvmoose87 No WTC 7 did not fit into the 9/11 target profile. That is a target that will be of great psychological impact. Also a very large target easily spotted from the air and large enough to easily manouver a passenger jet into.
@abvmoose87 How does WTC 7 fit into the picture of WTC 1, 2, Pentagon, WH/Capitol? Answer It doe NOT fit. What does WTC 1 and 2 stand for? Pentagon? WH? Capitol? now compare that to WTC 7? It has no meaning to the attack...period. It was a insignificant, meaningless building, to the attacks and hiting it would be pointless! It does not stand for money and power like 1 and 2 did/does, it does not stand for military power like the pentagon does, and it does not stand for...cont'
Funny how you don't show the WIDELY seen pictures and video of the plane debris and person items found. First responders found plenty of body parts. The majority of the plane was recovered. You are spreading stories that are just not true. The video you are showing is after the clean up.
@Gate4201 Claims - "yup 95% of United 93 was found I agree with you 100%"
Please show any link or documentation to this 95 % claim. You won't nor can you, it does not exist, IF so, prove me wrong. And the reporters story of the "FBI said" does not count.
@Gate4201 Where's your source for that information? I'd be interested to know if you've seen the documentary "Loose Change", and what you thought of it. Thanks.
Fly at 500 mph into the ground and tell me if your body will remain at the top... learn some science please, when you drive a metal stick into the ground at around 30 mph with maybe 70 lb force it will go pretty deep, a plane is built like a torpedo with added blades that will burry itself at that speed, those plane crashes you see on the TV are crashes that were horizontal to the ground, this plane pretty much hit it vertical based on how the ground is cratered.
also some israelis student got arrested after the plane hit, some woman saw them jumping around given each other high fives, they had a video camera , and one month after 911 they whent on israeli tv program , and said that they where ther to document the event,
so many small thing dont add up, to me the goverment knew somthing forhand, and allowd this to happend,the denie that the knew,but over 10 nation warnd them that ther would b attack hicjakd planes crashing into buildings
Then again iv flown Flight simulator for afew years now, and trying to hit the Pentagon with a passenger plane is damn hard without hitting a tree or some shit. So a terrorist doing it with practice on a propeller plane is hard to beleave. That and the shitty one video the government has released of the pentagon attack.
and for some reason he got some sort of super powers that day
and landed a massiev 747 plane to the penticon in a unbelieble monuver, i dont buy the official story about this whole thing but that is just my opinion, i mean after the planes where down all of them, ther was still report of the filght 93 somehwere in dallas or seattle by the flight controlers ,
well what about the Flight trainers ? and pp how they knew
stating that one of these hijacker was so bad pilot
that he cold barely flly a cessna ? or a profecinal commercial pilot how whent on a simulator, he could not fligh in to the pentagon, i mean to the official story is fishy,
im not trying to disespecting anyone, but this to is just BS to me atleast
@kiddalingur ...what about the flight trainers? You don't even know what they said...all you do is go to some bullcrap troofer site and repeat what is claimed to be a fact.
Has anything like that ever happened before 9/11? NO. So why do so many fucking Idiots think they KNOW exactly how things SHOULD have looked, with the buildings or with the wreckage out in that field???
If it was a midair explosion and if it was shot down, pieces of the aircraft would fall at terminal velocity, simple physics, the you'd see alot of wreakage like TWA's flight 800 that blew up in midair and crashed in the ocean.
I remember watching on the news that day and the earliest reporters on the scene were reporting that the wreckage was scattered over miles and that no piece had been found larger than a phonebook. That sounds like an explosion in mid-air.
What puzzles me though is why not just admit that the air force shot it down? I don't think you'd find anyone voicing objections. Maybe because they wanted to trot out this story about the passenger uprising to drum up support for war?
@Libbathegreat ..who cares if you are "puzzled". I am puzzeled why truthers claim that the plane was shot down when witnesses saw an intact plane crash.
i mean if pp dont have small doubt that the oficaly story is fishy,
i fel bad for them,ust so many small tings dose not add up to me,
imean some pp got some dust from the WT towers and had expert examing that,and they found a type of thermite or somthing,what a hell is that about?
i mean,you must have some doubt?do you?i mean before wt7came down,there was a massive explosion cought on camera,and even police ofiser telling pp to get back cuz the building is coming down
Ok you want to prove to everyone that a plane traveling at 500mph strait into the ground is suppost to leave large amount of wreakage, then why dont you rent a jet and fly it into the ground by yourself. and make me think different.
@RandomnessMoe says - "Ok you want to prove to everyone that a plane traveling at 500mph strait into the ground is suppost to leave large amount of wreakage,"
What makes you think said plane did NOT leave large pcs.?
How can truthers say that the military stood down on 9/11 and use that as "proof" of a government conspiracy but then turn around and say UA93 was shot down? And even if it was (it wasn't), what does that prove?
Oh yeah there is video that the Goverment has of the Actuall Plane (Errrrrrr MISSLE) hiting the Pentagon, not the split second garbage shown to the masses. That film has been locked away forever... That film show s a Missle NOT A JET LINER.. If we could see that film. Even the SHEEP that cant and wont handle the truth would be forced to wake up...911 WAS INDEED AINSIDE JOB.
@jonescool1fly ....no answer to my question. I win. Answer to your question, as evidenced by the fire assessment reports from multiple fire commanders, bodies impacting sounded like explosions to those inside.Buildings collapsing sounded like bombs to those inside other buildings. Elevators falling down shafts....sounded like bombs. Too easy troofer, what else do you need explained?
@jonescool1fly The SHEEP are the truthers, so eager to march to the drum of the big boogeyman mentality. CG planes, live hologram planes, hundreds of faked memorial services, staged phone calls from the air and towers, are WE are the sheep?
@plbhl if u think steel can melt in an 1100 degree celcius fire, being a sheep is the least of your worries, i dont come with insults, i come with fact.. And if u still buy into a story that makes NO sense, good for u... A conspiracy is only a conspiracy, if it doesnt make sense, or evidence doesnt match up.. From firemen to janitors to pentagon employees, NO OFFICIAL STORIES SOUND CREDIBLE, but the accounts of everyday people that the media gives no attention, deserves some attention...
@boolshmool Nobody said the steel "melted", it was "weakened" enough from the 1hr 45min fire to give way. The structural damage from impact combined with compromised steel strength did it, not melting. The SHEEP comment was jonescool1fly who called non-truthers sheep.
@Thuggin2222 You more likely to be the dumbass gov puppet that will believe whatever is told to you open your eyes these theories have valid points and a plane crash at high speed doesnt compact to the loaf of bread crap you are vomiting no luggage no debris do real research or shut the hell up
When a jet slams into the ground at 400 mph, there is nothing left that's bigger than a loaf a bread. I can't believe there are still dumb fuck conspiracy theorists around. Don't direct me to any of your other "research", I've seen them all and its all bullshit. Funny how you 9-11 truthers and the other group of idiots who think the moon landing was faked are more likely to vote democrat... it all makes sense now.
Your theories might be just a little bit more believable if you knew how to use the proper form of "you're" and "your". Honestly, this is just a load of crap. If the plane didn't crash in Shanksville, where else did it crash? Think about that before posting this crap.
@Gracethegreat32 Then where in the hell is it? Ahh yes that magical jet fuel, I forgot about that jet fuel that can bring down steel buildings with molten steel running down the sides and create enough heat to melt ground zero workers boots 4 week later and make not one but two commercial airliners disappear into thin air, I'm sorry I lost my head there for a moment, that jetfuel defied the laws of physics that day, but who cares about the laws of physics, USA USA USA....
This video is pretty messed up to the ppl that died on flight 93. I guess if you overturn a high jack plane and save many ppl from dying you get a bunch of ppl saying it never happened
Where's the proof that the picture at 2:18 was taken before 2001? And if so, how can we know it is exactly the same spot as where the crash took place?
@MegaYeshua33 Says - "google images " Was this your answer for me ?
Link me to ANY pictures you made claim to ( engines and landing gear )
There is a picture of a full engine laying by the hole on the flight 93 video CD cover ? That one ? Do you know how to respond to the link so I know you left a response ?
Thank you for sharing this. There is nothing, nothing that a jet airliner can possibly do to make a multi-ton titanium steel jet engine "disappear" or "evaporate" or anything else. They and the landing gear are built to be indestructible, period. Yet another part of the official 9/11 that stinks, like dead fish.
@Mr16055 get you facts straight! in no circumstance can an entire plane disintegrate without any trace of it left. There are always pieces left, landing gear, Engines, sheets metal from the fuselage. Look at photo's from EVERY Airline crash on land, there is always debris!!
@iarefluff get your facts straight! they're was debris. the plane was going 500 mph straight down into soft farmland, the wreckage buried itself in the ground. The heavier parts such as the engines, and landing gear buried themselves the deepest. They dug this up and there are pictures of it.
@MegaYeshua33 says - " The heavier parts such as the engines, and landing gear buried themselves the deepest. They dug this up and there are pictures of it."
What about these parts ? The engine that bounced (said to be found 600 yds away ?)
The tail near by, the cock pit that broke off and flopped, and the landing gear with the fuselage down by the pond ? Please show or direct to pictures of these parts ( not the 2 1/2 window pc. or the pc. that fits nicely in the back hoe bucket.)
@Mr16055 Every single airplane in history crashed at 500mph and ALL had engines, landing gear, and tail sections near by. ALL of them...yet on 9/11 you expect me to believe four plans vanished in a crash??? Please explain how this is remotely possible
@TheRemoteMower Every single airplane in history crashed at 500mph? Hahaha, this is classic truther. Here's one that didn't! In 1979 American Airlines 191 crashed immediately during takeoff. There is no way it was going 500mph so soon. Besides, when planes crash, it's generally by accident and the pilots attempt to the very last moment to regain control. They don't full throttle it into the ground like Ziad Jarrah did.
It was a missile, just like at the pentagon, which made a puff of black smoke. A real plane with real passengers was shot down nearby, and those victims were used as passengers for all of the other four fake flights - mixed with made up passengers - to give more credibility to the whole story. That's why they had to fake it while at the same time a plane really was shot down and crashed with debris, luggage, bodies, etc, but it was kept hidden. It was ALL planned, everything had a reason.
@prescientbeing no it was real my father was dispatched to shanksville and saw the wreckage with his own eyes, not to mention one of my best friends father was in the control tower of the johnstown airport. this was crash was one hundred percent real
@prescientbeing Are you stupid? The Govt. couldn't even hide a blowjob, yet the Govt. orchestrated the events of 911 and staged a world event with FAKE planes, FAKE victims, FAKE wreckage, FAKE interviews, FAKE media coverage, thousands of FAKE eyewitnesses, FAKE flight path data, FAKE black box recordings, FAKE admittance from AL Qaeda, Fake building collapses, FAKE airplane parts, FAKE explosions, FAKE 911 calls, FAKE interviews with thousands of official? REALLY?. Get the fuck out of the USA
@ecfrazier2222 its not the government dumb ass. its the behind the scenes kabals that run our country. the government is just covering up the truth. open your eyes and get a clue. denial will not get you very far in this life.
@thebluetarp Well interesting concept! thebluetarp is suggesting that the government is "covering up the truth". Furthermore thebluetarp suggest the "kabals" run our country? I'm reluctant to offer any suggestion of real substance to this idiot who is basically claiming beliefs of our countries basic constitutional rights is being run by a radical group of conspiracy theorist. thebluetap you realize you just categorized your self as a class 1 idiot right? You have Absolutely no facts AT ALL
@prescientbeing The fact that they claim bodies and luggage remained after aluminum and titanium were supposedly incinerated at this site tells me enough to start asking some hard questions.
Damn...was finally about to give up thinking about 9/11 conspiracy theories then I had to go and watch this. Definitely the most damning evidence I've seen.
@ZestyandLumpy - Have you seen the relatively new investigation on the 9/11 pentagon? Now that's damning! U-tube: 9/11 Chenney Rumsfeld Black Operations at the Pentagon or Pentagon Papers. Peace Out
@inferno64906 yea the plane was going so fast, when it hit everything was just destroyed my father was there, and he said the largest pieces of anything he could find were like 2 to 3 feet
that was impressive....maybe no scientist but you should be..................you dont want to BE right...you want to get it right......and now i wish people would come up with the plan .......how does it go from here? or we all say - dont be stupid while we stupidly sit watch and wait......
You are an idiot. When a plane crashes at it's highest velocity straight into the ground, you will not see anything but tiny parts of metal, maybe human remains and dirt. Have you ever seen an aircraft nose-dive into the ground? I have. I highly doubt you've see anything like that. Maybe you should get off your America-is-the-bad-guy rant and open your eyes to what really happened. People like you sicken me. My God have mercy on your soul.
@haastaboozia And that u didnt see when flt 93 crashed. No tiny parts but later they dug up parts from the hole. Talking about nose first crash. I have an old Faces of Death VHS videocassette where are few plane crashes. One of them is nose first crash next to the kids playground on the cropfield. There were engines, pieces of a fuselage, landing gears etc all around the crash point. It's just hilarious that 767 dove like an U-boat under the ground:)
@haastaboozia I wish your God had more mercy with all human beings that have to suffer for the enormous greed amongst those psychopaths that wishes to expand their wealth and power under the false flag operation "American freedom" and things like that.
USA is in the hands of evil and fascism and greed.
@haastaboozia My whole family takes particular interest in crashes because my dad makes jet engines. I've never seen nor heard of nearly 200 tons of metal disappearing into the ground. Much of the fuselage could, but large portions of the wings and tail lose kinetic energy as they shear off, and come to rest on the surface. The only exception is mach fighters because the whole body is more compact and they're capable of higher speeds.
@SuperVillages True...7 never got hit by a plane, lol thats fucking common knowledge captain obvious! No one said it was hit by a plane...it WAS hit by debris from WTC1 when it collapsed, resulting in the fires on ten floors, a 18-20 story gash in 7 in sw corner, and damage at the foundation. 7 was a two stage collapse, starting with the east penthouse collapsing first, followed by the rest of the building about 8 seconds later, total time about 15-18 seconds.
@MegaSlaze yes debris from 1 hit 7. try ten floors on fire that burn uncontrolled for 6-7 hours. The penthouse collapsed first, the the rest of the building collapsed 8 seconds later...total of 15-48 seconds. the fire fighter knew early on that 7 was going to collapse because of the fire, and damage. they saw the and heard the building bulging and buckling. it has nothing to do with believing the gov or not...thats what happen.
@lcspies What's amazing is the rest of the WTC building under 1 and 2 never collapsed. They were sheared in half and burnt to the frame yet they never collapsed like 7 did. LOL. Only the 3 buildings owned by what's his face fell.
@Yerizzo Wasn't much left to collapse after being almost destroyed, they were not 47 story buildings either. most were 10 stories are less, I think one was 22. totally different construction as well. Jenga? Really? roflmao!
well the plane parts i understand i dont see how they can find a wheel from the flight to the WTC but bodies lets be real they would have burnt to nothing by the time the people arrived
@oX313Xo What bothers me is how they claim that the aluminum and titanium airplanes burned to virtually nothing, but wallets and passports that were inside somehow survived that inferno. Paper burns at a much lower temperature than airplanes.
flight 93 was shot down, it didnt just crash.. that may explain to you why the crash site doesnt look like the crash site of a plane that just went into the ground
@smellyturdkid12 i would delete your account if i could just for your name it shows your incappable of realism, go play with your toys and game systems, come back when you have cancer from GMO's
I wondered when folks would wake up to the fake set up of this crash. Horrible job staging it. Frankly, it's pretty insulting assuming people would believe it. I suspect all the passengers were taken into a room, executed and mass burial. Just a gut feeling I have and it's saddening to believe this and see what our country has become under the fascism.
@jhodgski, but you would think that if they were talking about the firemen it would've been referred to as "Pull them" not 'Pull it". It would be a little odd referring to the firemen as "it".
@astralkidd One of the better ones is watch?v=84doiQHJ5rQ . Some people defend him by trying to make out that "Pull it" meant "Pull the firemen out of the building..." (despite "Pull it", not surprisingly, being an industry term for "Pull it down").
The other problem with what Silverstein says is the fact that there were no firemen in the building at that time he was supposed to have this conversation with the fire department commander.
OATH KEEPER: Help a retired Iraq veteran expose corporate fraud & state-sponsored terrorism MSM fails to even touch. houmadabrave on both MySpace & Facebook
CLANSON®
Create Local Awareness Networks to Secure Our Nation
@PhilGaithersburg1115@Harrysound I don't want to fall out with either of you, but do your research on "Barry Jennings WTC7" and "Larry Silverstein WTC7", then come back to me and explain to me why I'm wrong. Barry and Larry - 2 very different people, but both give their own, clear-as-day evidence of explosions and a controlled demolition of WTC7. Seriously, come back to me and explain why Barry Jennings' evidence of explosives was not even considered by the official 9/11 investigation.
@PhilGaithersburg1115 Are you asking me another question because you cannot deal with Barry Jennings' statements? See him here describe explosions in WTC7 *before* WTC1 or WTC2 came down - watch?v=kRaKHq2dfCI . Watch that and answer my previous questions, then I'll answer yours.
@jhodgski your question to me was "Seriously, come back to me and explain why Barry Jennings' evidence of explosives was not even considered by the official 9/11 investigation"
That's not a question I can answer. I have absolutely no idea why not. You'd have to ask them.
Now, my question to you was "what physical evidence is there supporting a controlled demolition of WTC7 ? "
@PhilGaithersburg1115 I've received your personal message. Presumably you choose to send me an offensive private message because you can't answer my questions?
If the plane didn't crash, where did all the people go? Also, those other plane crashes were low altitude, low-speed flying planes. This was low altitude, but traveling at 563 miles an hour at the moment of impact. It's called disintegration. Missiles do that.
Amazing it it hit an exact shaped hole with deadly accuracy isnt it?
Amazing the intense heat didnt burn the dry grass isnt it?
Amazing the intense fireball and impact that destroyed solid titanium alloy engines somehow left the inevitable terrorists passports totally unscathed along with a terrorist bandana totally unsinged.
Amazing the terrorist repeatedly says "we have a bomb on board"
then the whole plane vanishes in an explosion and nobody even tests for explosives isnt it?
zenoist2 1 day ago
@zenoist2 No, because the hole in the pic is a different mark.
No, because the grass is green and therefore not dry.
No, because there were lots of pieces of debris found of which the ones you describe are just a couple.
No, because they knew hijackers were crashing planes and that the onboard phonecalls,ensuing overheard struggle and the behaviour of the plane as described by those who say it out of normal control then crash into a field would suggest no bombs were present.
pookster78 16 hours ago
Without even covering the rest of the bullshit in this vid, when compared with a number of aerial shots it is clear that nothing in the 94 pic has anything to do with the actual impact zone. So,your definitely no scientist and you maybe are a bit stupid.
pookster78 1 day ago
you are stupid man the wing line is across the dark line its just you are a failure at life and dont like to admit it
s040978 1 day ago
@s040978 : The scar on the ground was there prior to 9/11.
Are you lost or something?!?! The hole in the ground was already there. It's a fucking scam, Dumbass, just like the rest of the event.
BadBoriBoy 1 day ago
Virgins!
TheWatchmen1476 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
408 stupid sheeple suffer from cognitive dissonance..Pff, contemptible insects they are.. like ants at a picnic, consuming pro government slop. lol. Same old trolling tactics being used against new and real evidence. Get some new material and cut the emotional bullshit out like "I dare you to say that to a victims family". What, tell them the truth, sure I'd be glad to :) Us real people are tired of the humiliation of sharing the same species name with you morons.
Italianlad69 4 days ago
Appendix C. Limited Metallurgical Examinations
Chapter / Section Number:
Appendix C
fema gov/library/viewRecord do?id=1728
fema.gov/library/file;jsessionid=C831CFC7FF6CDB11263D7A0D98E7CFC4.WorkerLibrary?type=publishedFile&file=403_apc.pdf&fileid=6d56be70-50bc-11e0-be57-001cc4568fb6
rpur441044 4 days ago
yes because when planes hit the groud at that speed they desiderata they dont stay in one piece
s040978 5 days ago
@s040978 Exactly....the plane was inverted and hit the ground at over 500mph disentigrating. Just like the plane that went down in Florida. Left a small hole and nothing else. You know what happens to soft living tissue when it hits something solid at over 500mph. Poof...splat...into nothing. The plane crashes shown in the video were from low trajectory impacts like during landings. Total idiots believe this crap because they can blame the government for their failed lives and social rejection.
Swordsfor200Alex 5 days ago
@Swordsfor200Alex : ROFL>>>>>
MORON.....YOU CAN LOOK UP A SATELLITE IMAGES OF THE CRASH SITE THAT WERE TAKEN PRIOR TO 9/11, & THE DEEP SCAR WAS ALREADY THERE.
WHAT DO YOU NOT GET ABOUT THAT INFORMATION?!?!
IT'S NOT A PLANE CRASH...IT'S A SKETCY CRIME SCENE THAT IS BEING HANDLED IN A SKETCHY WAY. OPEN YOUR EYES, MORON!!!!
BadBoriBoy 5 days ago
@Swordsfor200Alex Are you saying there were no large parts because of the speed at which it is said to hit at ?
asicit2b 5 days ago
@s040978 : Sorry MORON, but the engines would NOT dissolve into the air.
What a RETARD!!!! Learn the basic physics of building materials.
BadBoriBoy 5 days ago
@BadBoriBoy Thats correct, engines dont dissolve into air...thats why they found both engines at the crash site scooter. Along with the black boxes, human remains, passenger and flight attendants ids, documents, papers, red bandanna, small part of the fuselage, etc...
lcspies 4 days ago
@lcspies Claims - " thats why they found both engines at the crash site"
Really ? Prove that one. Please by all means direct to the link or pictures of these two (2) engines you speak of. Not including the picture of that pc. that fits nicely into the back hoe bucket. The Black boxes ? Again prove they are from said plane by providing the serial numbers to confirm, thank you.
asicit2b 3 days ago
@lcspies : ROFL
Did they find the magic cell phones too?!?! You know the ones that can make calls to the ground from 20000ft in the air during 9/11/2001.
Use your eyes RETARD!!!! Where are the firemen?!! Why are there people in radioactive suits?!?! It isn't impossible for paper to make it out of a plane crash, but the percentage is about 8% likely hood. Paper is a thin sheet of wood.
BadBoriBoy 3 days ago
@BadBoriBoy Huh Hello? Cellphone calls were possible in 2001...Try consulting experts, not truther sites moron! Radioactive suits at a plane crash? roflmao Research ANY air crash, and see that paper(S) ALWAYS survive after the crash...dipshit! Cash, documents, passports, letters, clothing, id's, etc...Allegheny 853 had cash everywhere, an unfinished letter, and a playing card still being held in the hand of a passengers severed arm/hand! Not very good at this are you scooter?
lcspies 3 days ago
@lcspies : ROFL. You are worse then RKOwens, & you are going purely of emotion.
Cell phones cold NOT work above 4000ft in 2001. You are fucking brain dead stupid. Every carrier was tested, & they all failed above 4000ft altitude.
It is kind of strange that the official story has impossible outcomes in all 4 scenes of the "attack". None of the 4 are evidence of a real plane crash regardless. I can easily prove that with EXPERIMENT using Newton's Laws of Motion.
BadBoriBoy 2 days ago
@BadBoriBoy lol...well many cell phone experts, CEO's, technicians, etc...from major companies all state that cellphone calls were possible in 2001. Do some research dipshit. Above 4000 ft? total bullshit!! I made cellphone calls from the top of Pikes Peak, at 14,110 ft before 2001, I have also made cellphone calls from my airplane above 4000ft!! 2700 degrees was possible so I dont get the reference about me being wrong, when did i mention temps or Owens?.And you cant prove crap...
lcspies 2 days ago
@lcspies " ROFL ...I was telling you were wrong about the cell phone calls b/c you were/are. And you were moving at 350mph too right?!?! lmao, what next a Virgin Mary?!?!
Jet fuel CAN NOT reach 2700 dumbass. Are you really that stupid?!?! The event has already been proven impossible from start to finish. NEWTON can't be wrong, RETARD!!!
BadBoriBoy 2 days ago
@BadBoriBoy sorry dumbass, you are wrong...cell phones worked in 2001...confirmed by industry experts on the subject, which trumps your truther bullcrap! The temps in the towers reached 1800-2000 degrees. Flashovers in house/office fires START at 900-1100F degrees and can burn as high as 2000+ depending on material. The possibility of 2700 was in the rubble piles afterward and more than jet fuel was burning dip shit, are YOU that stupid? R-E-S-E-A-R-C-H try it sometime dipstick.
lcspies 2 days ago
@lcspies : ROFL
THERMITE/MATE REACHES OVER 4000F. It is pretty much the only thing that could have left 2700F in the aftermath. Jet fuel can not reach these temps.
BadBoriBoy 2 days ago
@BadBoriBoy Thermite? You really think thermite was used? OMG!!! Yeah ok you fucking dumbass!! Research aye? and you still believe in the use of thermite? OBVIOUSLY you have not done any research or you would know that thermite would be fucking bullcrap! Not to swift in science are you? Ever burn steel wool? Heard of oxidation or iron burning? If you did you would know how 2700 could be possible to produce molten steel in the rubble piles. Again MORE THAN JET FUEL was burning, Idiot!
lcspies 2 days ago
@lcspies : ROFL
THE GREAT THERMATE DEBATE
BadBoriBoy 2 days ago
@lcspies : ROFL
You are telling ME to research. I have been a victim of this event. I have been debunking the shit out of it from day 1. It is impossible from start to finish. It is quite the fairy tale as well.
Unless YOU were affected personally from this event, there is no way you have done more research, nor debunked more claims like I have.
BadBoriBoy 2 days ago
@BadBoriBoy Mythbusters could not even cut a car in half with 1/2 ton of thermite...a 1/2 ton! Enough thermite to bring down two 110 story buildings and a 47 story building would be astronomical!! Plus all the crap needed to set it off, hold the thermite in place, etc...None of which was found...thermite! roflmao!! Why not say it was a nuke too...
lcspies 2 days ago
@BadBoriBoy ROFL...Lets see..."No planes","flying holograms of jets","the planes were cgis","The towers were never there to begin with","nukes were used","thermite","bombs","controlled demolitions","missiles","global hawk","military jets with no windows","directed energy weapons","93 shot down","lasers","Aliens did it","False Flag Operation","Dancing Israelis","Israelis in van full of explosives","Jews stayed home","Mosad","Mysterious Noises from floor 38", cont'...
lcspies 2 days ago
@BadBoriBoy Cont'... "Elevator upgrades","Pre-planted bombs", "Cheney was in charge of Norad","White Plane","NO fires","space beams", "Breach Kit","No Gravity" Did I miss anything? Shit the list keeps growing! And yet not one shred of evidence to prove your case. Can't wait to see what you idiots dream up next! too funny
lcspies 2 days ago
@lcspies THE GREAT THERMATE DEBATE
BadBoriBoy 2 days ago
@BadBoriBoy Steel wool burning, oxidation, iron burning, materials in the rubble piles from building materials all explain the heat, molten metal or molten steel...thermite is/was not needed...thermite is total bullcrap!
lcspies 2 days ago
@lcspies
NEWTON vs NIST
BadBoriBoy 2 days ago
@BadBoriBoy watch?v=PPAYZMzGMwQ&feature=related 1/2 ton could not even cut through a couple pieces of thin aluminum/steel in a car but somehow can burn through thousands of thick steel box beams/I beams? roflmao! yeah sure! Not to mention the amount needed would be to ludicrous to even consider!! Also the violent burn and bright flames from the thermite reaction was never seen or mentioned from fire fighters or people in the buildings. Thermite is bullcrap...period!
lcspies 2 days ago
@lcspies :
THE GREAT THERMATE DEBATE
BadBoriBoy 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BadBoriBoy "THE GREAT THERMATE DEBATE" thats your "victim" of 9/11 go to research info? Tried any REAL research\investigation on your own? Obviously not!
lcspies 2 days ago
@lcspies As you know I do not discuss the thermite stuff, BUT this video is impressive and proves a few things. watch -( THERMITE CUTTING STEEL -- EXPERIMENTALLY DEMONSTRATED)
asicit2b 2 days ago
@asicit2b ; THE GREAT THERMATE DEBATE is the best by Jonathan Cole under the physicsandreason channel!!!!
lcpies is going off emotion only. No critical thinking skills what so ever.
BadBoriBoy 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@asicit2b ; THE GREAT THERMATE DEBATE is the best by Jonathan Cole under the physicsandreason channel!!!!
lcpies is going off emotion only. No critical thinking skills what so ever.
BadBoriBoy 2 days ago
@lcspies >>>> It sucks to be wrong, but you are.
RKOwens will no longer let people comment on his videos b/c he was making fun of Jason Bermus for making claims that FEMA recorded 2700 deg F. @ ground zero.
Not only did FEMA record it, but NASA did as well. RK even posted a thread over it & felt like a complete retard when he found out it was indeed TRUE.
He deleted the Bermus vid, & will no longer allow comments on his BS videos.
BadBoriBoy 2 days ago
@BadBoriBoy hay dum ass yes they would not in to air but when you hit a solid object going 300-500 mph it dose and that dose not include the rate at witch they were falling my dad works for american and yes there were 3 air craft that went down that day excuse me 4 i think i would know my dad did not go to work for 3 days because of this in cedent your a dum ass and a piece of shit if you think the government would cause this you all are dum fuck i wish you were the one how had died that day
s040978 1 day ago
@s040978 ; ROFL
Your dad works for American so he knows everything about government cover-ups?
ROFL. If you take the visual evidence of Shanksville & compare it with 10 other plane crashes it says it all. You really need to focus on how to read/write basic English.
Not every part of the engine turns into air RETARD!!! In tenerife it happened to Pan Am, but the engines were left on by the captain who was injured when KLM hit them. You can still see the engines from both planes though, MORON!!!
BadBoriBoy 1 day ago
I would love to see you say that the people who died on that tragic day didn't actually die to the families who lost loved ones! I visited the memorial two days ago and met the wife of the captain!! She is still devastated!! But you being a worthless piece of crap have the balls to say it's not real! They found a piece if the plane last April stuck in a tree! They found enough remains to tell who was who on the plane! The found the booklet that told the al - queada guys how to fly the plane! Yo
cjsams2010 6 days ago
If you have ever been to a crash site, up close and personal, you would know the truth and this video would have never been posted....your right, your no scientist !
47927411D 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You're always going to be told that there's a big enemy that poses a big threat Because without one,you wont need THEM to protect you from it ! And you wont pay for their huge military,support their wars or tolerate loss of freedoms in the name of keeping you safe from it.That threat needs to come with examples that can be pointed to as proof the threat is real.What would the defense budget be like today without 911?CIA budget?Would you support the wars if they said they were for control Oil?
waitew 1 week ago
flight 93 was headed for congress/whitehouse if it had made it usa would have been able to declare full martial law.i dont really know why 93 was taken out of the loop but b thankful it was makes sense it may have been intended for building 7,and yes they are all contected whole thing like many others were all planned to last detail only thing im suprised about is that the stupid pricks actually managed t pull it off and fool you all..still.how much evidence and specialist info do you need t see
mamamonster2011 1 week ago
@mamamonster2011 think about it. everything in the white house as well as the white house its self would be destroyed.. they wouldn't want to destroy the white house and moving everything of importance from the white house wouldn't be able to be pulled off without someone noticing so the best thing to do is make it look like the plane couldn't make it to its mark. That's why the only plane that didn't hit was the White House..
JMcMac21 1 week ago
What does truthers think about the theory that united 93 was supposed to hit wc7 but since the flight got 5 hours delayed there was a change of plans?
abvmoose87 1 week ago
@abvmoose87 flight 93 was not going to hit wtc 7...it was headed for the WH or Capitol building. 7 had no significance in the attacks what so ever and hitting it would be pointless...WTC 1, 2, Pentagon, WH/Capitol were targets for a reason and wtc 7 does not fit into the picture.
lcspies 1 week ago
@lcspies wtc7 does fit into the picture and there are alot of motives to bring it down but you don't seem to be on to that track so il leave it with that we simply disagree then
abvmoose87 1 week ago
@abvmoose87 No WTC 7 did not fit into the 9/11 target profile. That is a target that will be of great psychological impact. Also a very large target easily spotted from the air and large enough to easily manouver a passenger jet into.
Spindry96 1 week ago
@abvmoose87 How does WTC 7 fit into the picture of WTC 1, 2, Pentagon, WH/Capitol? Answer It doe NOT fit. What does WTC 1 and 2 stand for? Pentagon? WH? Capitol? now compare that to WTC 7? It has no meaning to the attack...period. It was a insignificant, meaningless building, to the attacks and hiting it would be pointless! It does not stand for money and power like 1 and 2 did/does, it does not stand for military power like the pentagon does, and it does not stand for...cont'
lcspies 1 week ago
@abvmoose87 cont' our leaders/congress, our sovereign power and might, etc...7 means nothing and adds nothing to this picture...period!
lcspies 1 week ago
Funny how you don't show the WIDELY seen pictures and video of the plane debris and person items found. First responders found plenty of body parts. The majority of the plane was recovered. You are spreading stories that are just not true. The video you are showing is after the clean up.
plbhl 1 week ago
@plbhl yup 95% of United 93 was found I agree with you 100%
Gate4201 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Gate4201 Claims - "yup 95% of United 93 was found I agree with you 100%"
Please show any link or documentation to this 95 % claim. You won't nor can you, it does not exist, IF so, prove me wrong. And the reporters story of the "FBI said" does not count.
asicit2b 1 week ago
@Gate4201 Where's your source for that information? I'd be interested to know if you've seen the documentary "Loose Change", and what you thought of it. Thanks.
scubarulz 1 week ago
ScreamMode1337, i totally agree with you.
RandomnessMoe 1 week ago
Fly at 500 mph into the ground and tell me if your body will remain at the top... learn some science please, when you drive a metal stick into the ground at around 30 mph with maybe 70 lb force it will go pretty deep, a plane is built like a torpedo with added blades that will burry itself at that speed, those plane crashes you see on the TV are crashes that were horizontal to the ground, this plane pretty much hit it vertical based on how the ground is cratered.
ScreamMode1337 2 weeks ago
DUuuuuh the goverment did this -,- to tell that the Muslims did this. This is all bullshit 2017 the document will be released and everyone will see.
GamersCamp 2 weeks ago
also some israelis student got arrested after the plane hit, some woman saw them jumping around given each other high fives, they had a video camera , and one month after 911 they whent on israeli tv program , and said that they where ther to document the event,
so many small thing dont add up, to me the goverment knew somthing forhand, and allowd this to happend,the denie that the knew,but over 10 nation warnd them that ther would b attack hicjakd planes crashing into buildings
kiddalingur 2 weeks ago
Then again iv flown Flight simulator for afew years now, and trying to hit the Pentagon with a passenger plane is damn hard without hitting a tree or some shit. So a terrorist doing it with practice on a propeller plane is hard to beleave. That and the shitty one video the government has released of the pentagon attack.
RandomnessMoe 2 weeks ago
@RandomnessMoe
the so calld hijacker, was a shitty pilot,
could not control cessna wery well .
and for some reason he got some sort of super powers that day
and landed a massiev 747 plane to the penticon in a unbelieble monuver, i dont buy the official story about this whole thing but that is just my opinion, i mean after the planes where down all of them, ther was still report of the filght 93 somehwere in dallas or seattle by the flight controlers ,
kiddalingur 2 weeks ago
@kiddalingur ...all four identified 9-11 pilots had valid FAA commercial pilot liscences and could have been hired by any commercial carrier.
dreadnaught2 2 weeks ago
@dreadnaught2
well what about the Flight trainers ? and pp how they knew
stating that one of these hijacker was so bad pilot
that he cold barely flly a cessna ? or a profecinal commercial pilot how whent on a simulator, he could not fligh in to the pentagon, i mean to the official story is fishy,
im not trying to disespecting anyone, but this to is just BS to me atleast
kiddalingur 2 weeks ago
@kiddalingur ...what about the flight trainers? You don't even know what they said...all you do is go to some bullcrap troofer site and repeat what is claimed to be a fact.
dreadnaught2 2 weeks ago
You my good men deserve some cookies.
RandomnessMoe 2 weeks ago
Has anything like that ever happened before 9/11? NO. So why do so many fucking Idiots think they KNOW exactly how things SHOULD have looked, with the buildings or with the wreckage out in that field???
Morons.
Holymakinaw 2 weeks ago
If it was a midair explosion and if it was shot down, pieces of the aircraft would fall at terminal velocity, simple physics, the you'd see alot of wreakage like TWA's flight 800 that blew up in midair and crashed in the ocean.
RandomnessMoe 2 weeks ago
I remember watching on the news that day and the earliest reporters on the scene were reporting that the wreckage was scattered over miles and that no piece had been found larger than a phonebook. That sounds like an explosion in mid-air.
What puzzles me though is why not just admit that the air force shot it down? I don't think you'd find anyone voicing objections. Maybe because they wanted to trot out this story about the passenger uprising to drum up support for war?
Libbathegreat 2 weeks ago
@Libbathegreat ..who cares if you are "puzzled". I am puzzeled why truthers claim that the plane was shot down when witnesses saw an intact plane crash.
dreadnaught2 2 weeks ago
@dreadnaught2
i mean if pp dont have small doubt that the oficaly story is fishy,
i fel bad for them,ust so many small tings dose not add up to me,
imean some pp got some dust from the WT towers and had expert examing that,and they found a type of thermite or somthing,what a hell is that about?
i mean,you must have some doubt?do you?i mean before wt7came down,there was a massive explosion cought on camera,and even police ofiser telling pp to get back cuz the building is coming down
kiddalingur 2 weeks ago
@Libbathegreat Because 93 WAS NOT shot down is why.
lcspies 1 week ago
Ok you want to prove to everyone that a plane traveling at 500mph strait into the ground is suppost to leave large amount of wreakage, then why dont you rent a jet and fly it into the ground by yourself. and make me think different.
RandomnessMoe 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RandomnessMoe says - "Ok you want to prove to everyone that a plane traveling at 500mph strait into the ground is suppost to leave large amount of wreakage,"
What makes you think said plane did NOT leave large pcs.?
asicit2b 2 weeks ago
Im no Scientist...but French Toast is good
Coolz444 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Coolz444 2 weeks ago
How can truthers say that the military stood down on 9/11 and use that as "proof" of a government conspiracy but then turn around and say UA93 was shot down? And even if it was (it wasn't), what does that prove?
LesCousinsDangereux 2 weeks ago
Oh yeah there is video that the Goverment has of the Actuall Plane (Errrrrrr MISSLE) hiting the Pentagon, not the split second garbage shown to the masses. That film has been locked away forever... That film show s a Missle NOT A JET LINER.. If we could see that film. Even the SHEEP that cant and wont handle the truth would be forced to wake up...911 WAS INDEED AINSIDE JOB.
jonescool1fly 2 weeks ago
@jonescool1fly ...so you can explain the hundreds of eyewtinesses that saw flight 77 hit the pentagon?
dreadnaught2 2 weeks ago
@dreadnaught2 Sure as soon as you can expain the Hundreds of eye witness that heard and saw explosions in the WTC 1,2 and 7....
jonescool1fly 2 weeks ago
@jonescool1fly ....no answer to my question. I win. Answer to your question, as evidenced by the fire assessment reports from multiple fire commanders, bodies impacting sounded like explosions to those inside.Buildings collapsing sounded like bombs to those inside other buildings. Elevators falling down shafts....sounded like bombs. Too easy troofer, what else do you need explained?
dreadnaught2 2 weeks ago
@jonescool1fly The SHEEP are the truthers, so eager to march to the drum of the big boogeyman mentality. CG planes, live hologram planes, hundreds of faked memorial services, staged phone calls from the air and towers, are WE are the sheep?
plbhl 1 week ago
@plbhl if u think steel can melt in an 1100 degree celcius fire, being a sheep is the least of your worries, i dont come with insults, i come with fact.. And if u still buy into a story that makes NO sense, good for u... A conspiracy is only a conspiracy, if it doesnt make sense, or evidence doesnt match up.. From firemen to janitors to pentagon employees, NO OFFICIAL STORIES SOUND CREDIBLE, but the accounts of everyday people that the media gives no attention, deserves some attention...
boolshmool 1 week ago
@boolshmool Nobody said the steel "melted", it was "weakened" enough from the 1hr 45min fire to give way. The structural damage from impact combined with compromised steel strength did it, not melting. The SHEEP comment was jonescool1fly who called non-truthers sheep.
plbhl 1 week ago
@Thuggin2222 You more likely to be the dumbass gov puppet that will believe whatever is told to you open your eyes these theories have valid points and a plane crash at high speed doesnt compact to the loaf of bread crap you are vomiting no luggage no debris do real research or shut the hell up
pumamelb 2 weeks ago
@pumamelb ..actuall a 400 plus mile an hour plane that crashes at a nose first angle with no deflection does compact and shatter everything.
dreadnaught2 2 weeks ago
When a jet slams into the ground at 400 mph, there is nothing left that's bigger than a loaf a bread. I can't believe there are still dumb fuck conspiracy theorists around. Don't direct me to any of your other "research", I've seen them all and its all bullshit. Funny how you 9-11 truthers and the other group of idiots who think the moon landing was faked are more likely to vote democrat... it all makes sense now.
Thuggin2222 2 weeks ago
staged bullshit 911 is a lie
bushbasher46 3 weeks ago
Your theories might be just a little bit more believable if you knew how to use the proper form of "you're" and "your". Honestly, this is just a load of crap. If the plane didn't crash in Shanksville, where else did it crash? Think about that before posting this crap.
Gracethegreat32 3 weeks ago
@Gracethegreat32 Then where in the hell is it? Ahh yes that magical jet fuel, I forgot about that jet fuel that can bring down steel buildings with molten steel running down the sides and create enough heat to melt ground zero workers boots 4 week later and make not one but two commercial airliners disappear into thin air, I'm sorry I lost my head there for a moment, that jetfuel defied the laws of physics that day, but who cares about the laws of physics, USA USA USA....
Allanlegacy43 3 weeks ago
This video is pretty messed up to the ppl that died on flight 93. I guess if you overturn a high jack plane and save many ppl from dying you get a bunch of ppl saying it never happened
Rgreatplay 3 weeks ago
this video is a load of crap this guy is a dick
FameOverDemise45 3 weeks ago
@FameOverDemise45 He really is. The same people who believe 9/11 was a conspiracy by our government believe in bigfoot, ufo's.
Jagnole101 3 weeks ago
Where's the proof that the picture at 2:18 was taken before 2001? And if so, how can we know it is exactly the same spot as where the crash took place?
MrRazorblade999 3 weeks ago
google images
MegaYeshua33 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MegaYeshua33 Says - "google images " Was this your answer for me ?
Link me to ANY pictures you made claim to ( engines and landing gear )
There is a picture of a full engine laying by the hole on the flight 93 video CD cover ? That one ? Do you know how to respond to the link so I know you left a response ?
asicit2b 3 weeks ago
Thank you for sharing this. There is nothing, nothing that a jet airliner can possibly do to make a multi-ton titanium steel jet engine "disappear" or "evaporate" or anything else. They and the landing gear are built to be indestructible, period. Yet another part of the official 9/11 that stinks, like dead fish.
37Dionysos 3 weeks ago
Your dumb the plane disintegrated that plane was going like 500 miles per hour ok so get your dam facts straight
Mr16055 4 weeks ago
@Mr16055 get you facts straight! in no circumstance can an entire plane disintegrate without any trace of it left. There are always pieces left, landing gear, Engines, sheets metal from the fuselage. Look at photo's from EVERY Airline crash on land, there is always debris!!
iarefluff 3 weeks ago
@iarefluff get your facts straight! they're was debris. the plane was going 500 mph straight down into soft farmland, the wreckage buried itself in the ground. The heavier parts such as the engines, and landing gear buried themselves the deepest. They dug this up and there are pictures of it.
MegaYeshua33 3 weeks ago
@MegaYeshua33 says - " The heavier parts such as the engines, and landing gear buried themselves the deepest. They dug this up and there are pictures of it."
What about these parts ? The engine that bounced (said to be found 600 yds away ?)
The tail near by, the cock pit that broke off and flopped, and the landing gear with the fuselage down by the pond ? Please show or direct to pictures of these parts ( not the 2 1/2 window pc. or the pc. that fits nicely in the back hoe bucket.)
asicit2b 3 weeks ago
@MegaYeshua33 Where are the pictures of the engines and ANY landing gear as YOU claim ?
asicit2b 3 weeks ago
@Mr16055 Every single airplane in history crashed at 500mph and ALL had engines, landing gear, and tail sections near by. ALL of them...yet on 9/11 you expect me to believe four plans vanished in a crash??? Please explain how this is remotely possible
TheRemoteMower 3 weeks ago
@TheRemoteMower Every single airplane in history crashed at 500mph? Hahaha, this is classic truther. Here's one that didn't! In 1979 American Airlines 191 crashed immediately during takeoff. There is no way it was going 500mph so soon. Besides, when planes crash, it's generally by accident and the pilots attempt to the very last moment to regain control. They don't full throttle it into the ground like Ziad Jarrah did.
LesCousinsDangereux 3 weeks ago
And from the tower ruins they found a passport used by a "terrorist"? Yeah, right.
poetxyz 4 weeks ago
Thanks
abeldanger(dot)net
OttoLund 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@asicit2b was originally posting as @asicit2 and this account was registered to Asicit McCoy, 38yo female from Stafford, TX.
These shills use multiple accounts. If @asicit2b proves she never was @asicit2 I'll close this account.
But I bet you hear nothing from @asicit2b about her not being @asicit2
PhilGaithersburg1115 1 month ago
Fucking dumb ass
TheBLADEKILLA 1 month ago
It was a missile, just like at the pentagon, which made a puff of black smoke. A real plane with real passengers was shot down nearby, and those victims were used as passengers for all of the other four fake flights - mixed with made up passengers - to give more credibility to the whole story. That's why they had to fake it while at the same time a plane really was shot down and crashed with debris, luggage, bodies, etc, but it was kept hidden. It was ALL planned, everything had a reason.
prescientbeing 1 month ago
@prescientbeing no it was real my father was dispatched to shanksville and saw the wreckage with his own eyes, not to mention one of my best friends father was in the control tower of the johnstown airport. this was crash was one hundred percent real
JRScott12 1 month ago
@prescientbeing Are you stupid? The Govt. couldn't even hide a blowjob, yet the Govt. orchestrated the events of 911 and staged a world event with FAKE planes, FAKE victims, FAKE wreckage, FAKE interviews, FAKE media coverage, thousands of FAKE eyewitnesses, FAKE flight path data, FAKE black box recordings, FAKE admittance from AL Qaeda, Fake building collapses, FAKE airplane parts, FAKE explosions, FAKE 911 calls, FAKE interviews with thousands of official? REALLY?. Get the fuck out of the USA
ecfrazier2222 1 month ago
@ecfrazier2222 its not the government dumb ass. its the behind the scenes kabals that run our country. the government is just covering up the truth. open your eyes and get a clue. denial will not get you very far in this life.
thebluetarp 1 month ago
@thebluetarp Well interesting concept! thebluetarp is suggesting that the government is "covering up the truth". Furthermore thebluetarp suggest the "kabals" run our country? I'm reluctant to offer any suggestion of real substance to this idiot who is basically claiming beliefs of our countries basic constitutional rights is being run by a radical group of conspiracy theorist. thebluetap you realize you just categorized your self as a class 1 idiot right? You have Absolutely no facts AT ALL
ecfrazier2222 1 month ago
@prescientbeing The fact that they claim bodies and luggage remained after aluminum and titanium were supposedly incinerated at this site tells me enough to start asking some hard questions.
venusbrain 4 weeks ago
Damn...was finally about to give up thinking about 9/11 conspiracy theories then I had to go and watch this. Definitely the most damning evidence I've seen.
ZestyandLumpy 1 month ago
@ZestyandLumpy then watch some alex jones
colton30m2 1 month ago
@colton30m2 Wow...am now officially sick to my stomach. Time to invest in a gun.
ZestyandLumpy 1 month ago
@ZestyandLumpy - Have you seen the relatively new investigation on the 9/11 pentagon? Now that's damning! U-tube: 9/11 Chenney Rumsfeld Black Operations at the Pentagon or Pentagon Papers. Peace Out
raceystacey32566 3 weeks ago
@raceystacey32566 Holy crap....after watching that I found something else too. Search here on youtube-"9/11: Follow the Money find the criminals".
ZestyandLumpy 2 weeks ago
@ZestyandLumpy - I've seen that one before. It's enlightening! I checked out the other links you sent. I like the way you think.
raceystacey32566 2 weeks ago
I guess the plane, the luggage, and the bodies disintegrated. There was some fire I believe but was put out before the news people arrived.
inferno64906 1 month ago
@inferno64906 yea the plane was going so fast, when it hit everything was just destroyed my father was there, and he said the largest pieces of anything he could find were like 2 to 3 feet
JRScott12 1 month ago
@JRScott12 at least he found something
inferno64906 4 weeks ago
that was impressive....maybe no scientist but you should be..................you dont want to BE right...you want to get it right......and now i wish people would come up with the plan .......how does it go from here? or we all say - dont be stupid while we stupidly sit watch and wait......
sunshine201063 1 month ago
All people need to do is play Jenga then finally they'll understand why the WTC buildings can't fall the way they did.
Yerizzo 1 month ago
@Yerizzo Troll harder. We all know that real truthers have more relevant comparisons, like comparing to other demolitions.
venusbrain 4 weeks ago
btw guys this is a discussion about flt 93, not a discussion about WTC buildings so spare some space for flt 93 thx:)
Scumbot404 1 month ago 2
You are an idiot. When a plane crashes at it's highest velocity straight into the ground, you will not see anything but tiny parts of metal, maybe human remains and dirt. Have you ever seen an aircraft nose-dive into the ground? I have. I highly doubt you've see anything like that. Maybe you should get off your America-is-the-bad-guy rant and open your eyes to what really happened. People like you sicken me. My God have mercy on your soul.
haastaboozia 1 month ago
@haastaboozia And that u didnt see when flt 93 crashed. No tiny parts but later they dug up parts from the hole. Talking about nose first crash. I have an old Faces of Death VHS videocassette where are few plane crashes. One of them is nose first crash next to the kids playground on the cropfield. There were engines, pieces of a fuselage, landing gears etc all around the crash point. It's just hilarious that 767 dove like an U-boat under the ground:)
Scumbot404 1 month ago
@haastaboozia I wish your God had more mercy with all human beings that have to suffer for the enormous greed amongst those psychopaths that wishes to expand their wealth and power under the false flag operation "American freedom" and things like that.
USA is in the hands of evil and fascism and greed.
HailAtheism 1 month ago
@haastaboozia My whole family takes particular interest in crashes because my dad makes jet engines. I've never seen nor heard of nearly 200 tons of metal disappearing into the ground. Much of the fuselage could, but large portions of the wings and tail lose kinetic energy as they shear off, and come to rest on the surface. The only exception is mach fighters because the whole body is more compact and they're capable of higher speeds.
venusbrain 4 weeks ago
site was an abandoned strip mine, soil loose, bet there was no deep search below the surface.
GroceryGame1981 1 month ago
Why is there a big ditch about 15 miles from my house then???
ThePSPfreak99 1 month ago
@ThePSPfreak99 Maybe you missed the part about the missile. Did you see an airplane go into the ground?
venusbrain 4 weeks ago
1:33 "I know what YOUR saying"
Learn how to spell at a third grade level and maybe, just maybe, people will listen to your half-baked conspiracy theories.
SolerMotorsports 1 month ago
Their were no passengers ya bumdasses it was a staged flight!!! How did building 7 Fall never got hit by a plane???? The gov has u guys fooled!!!
SuperVillages 1 month ago
@SuperVillages True...7 never got hit by a plane, lol thats fucking common knowledge captain obvious! No one said it was hit by a plane...it WAS hit by debris from WTC1 when it collapsed, resulting in the fires on ten floors, a 18-20 story gash in 7 in sw corner, and damage at the foundation. 7 was a two stage collapse, starting with the east penthouse collapsing first, followed by the rest of the building about 8 seconds later, total time about 15-18 seconds.
lcspies 1 month ago
@lcspies WTC7 came down from debris from WTC1?
LMFAO.
How does a building fall inward from debris and a few office fires?
Did you not see the penthouse fall 2-3 seconds before the rest of the building came down?
You must try so hard to not believe 9/11 was done by the U.S government.
MegaSlaze 1 month ago
@MegaSlaze yes debris from 1 hit 7. try ten floors on fire that burn uncontrolled for 6-7 hours. The penthouse collapsed first, the the rest of the building collapsed 8 seconds later...total of 15-48 seconds. the fire fighter knew early on that 7 was going to collapse because of the fire, and damage. they saw the and heard the building bulging and buckling. it has nothing to do with believing the gov or not...thats what happen.
lcspies 1 month ago
@lcspies What's amazing is the rest of the WTC building under 1 and 2 never collapsed. They were sheared in half and burnt to the frame yet they never collapsed like 7 did. LOL. Only the 3 buildings owned by what's his face fell.
Yerizzo 1 month ago
@Yerizzo Wasn't much left to collapse after being almost destroyed, they were not 47 story buildings either. most were 10 stories are less, I think one was 22. totally different construction as well. Jenga? Really? roflmao!
lcspies 1 month ago
well the plane parts i understand i dont see how they can find a wheel from the flight to the WTC but bodies lets be real they would have burnt to nothing by the time the people arrived
oX313Xo 1 month ago
@oX313Xo What bothers me is how they claim that the aluminum and titanium airplanes burned to virtually nothing, but wallets and passports that were inside somehow survived that inferno. Paper burns at a much lower temperature than airplanes.
venusbrain 4 weeks ago
flight 93 was shot down, it didnt just crash.. that may explain to you why the crash site doesnt look like the crash site of a plane that just went into the ground
jhavid2 1 month ago
people need mental help.. seriously toatal thumbs down
smellyturdkid12 1 month ago
@smellyturdkid12 i would delete your account if i could just for your name it shows your incappable of realism, go play with your toys and game systems, come back when you have cancer from GMO's
jac5562 1 month ago
@smellyturdkid12 It's T O T A L.
torquesport 1 month ago
i disliked this video so i dont get killed.
DX17REAPER17DX 1 month ago
I wondered when folks would wake up to the fake set up of this crash. Horrible job staging it. Frankly, it's pretty insulting assuming people would believe it. I suspect all the passengers were taken into a room, executed and mass burial. Just a gut feeling I have and it's saddening to believe this and see what our country has become under the fascism.
PissedOffChurchLady 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
ht tp://lawrencespies . mysiselpro . com/ Ultimate Home-Business Solution (International)
lcspies 1 month ago
@jhodgski, but you would think that if they were talking about the firemen it would've been referred to as "Pull them" not 'Pull it". It would be a little odd referring to the firemen as "it".
astralkidd 1 month ago
betcha the passengers of 93 are holed up as prisoners in a FEMA camp somewhere !!
operator223 1 month ago
what a pile of crap
tyrespinningfreak 1 month ago
where did it crash then
usefullidiot316 1 month ago
@jhodgski, watched this clip. The talk about pulling WTC7. "WTC 7 - Pull It By Larry Silverstein "
astralkidd 1 month ago
@astralkidd One of the better ones is watch?v=84doiQHJ5rQ . Some people defend him by trying to make out that "Pull it" meant "Pull the firemen out of the building..." (despite "Pull it", not surprisingly, being an industry term for "Pull it down").
The other problem with what Silverstein says is the fact that there were no firemen in the building at that time he was supposed to have this conversation with the fire department commander.
jhodgski 1 month ago
OATH KEEPER: Help a retired Iraq veteran expose corporate fraud & state-sponsored terrorism MSM fails to even touch. houmadabrave on both MySpace & Facebook
CLANSON®
Create Local Awareness Networks to Secure Our Nation
houmadabrave 1 month ago
@PhilGaithersburg1115 @Harrysound I don't want to fall out with either of you, but do your research on "Barry Jennings WTC7" and "Larry Silverstein WTC7", then come back to me and explain to me why I'm wrong. Barry and Larry - 2 very different people, but both give their own, clear-as-day evidence of explosions and a controlled demolition of WTC7. Seriously, come back to me and explain why Barry Jennings' evidence of explosives was not even considered by the official 9/11 investigation.
jhodgski 1 month ago
@jhodgski [with an open mind] what physical evidence is there supporting a controlled demolition of WTC7 ?
PhilGaithersburg1115 1 month ago
@PhilGaithersburg1115 Are you asking me another question because you cannot deal with Barry Jennings' statements? See him here describe explosions in WTC7 *before* WTC1 or WTC2 came down - watch?v=kRaKHq2dfCI . Watch that and answer my previous questions, then I'll answer yours.
jhodgski 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jhodgski your question to me was "Seriously, come back to me and explain why Barry Jennings' evidence of explosives was not even considered by the official 9/11 investigation"
That's not a question I can answer. I have absolutely no idea why not. You'd have to ask them.
Now, my question to you was "what physical evidence is there supporting a controlled demolition of WTC7 ? "
PhilGaithersburg1115 1 month ago
@PhilGaithersburg1115 I've received your personal message. Presumably you choose to send me an offensive private message because you can't answer my questions?
I think you need help, fella.
jhodgski 1 month ago
@jhodgski when will people wake up to this being an inside job? Explosions took down WTC7 and no planes hit WTC 1 or 2
jamesandrewhodgskiss 1 month ago
If the plane didn't crash, where did all the people go? Also, those other plane crashes were low altitude, low-speed flying planes. This was low altitude, but traveling at 563 miles an hour at the moment of impact. It's called disintegration. Missiles do that.
Tidiouter 1 month ago
So yo in 1994 there CRASH SITE" was like the same ?
but they change it like looking a plane crash into the ground right ?
hard to see the pic
MUNI743 1 month ago