Latino Americans, French Polynesians and Filipinos are examples of GENETIC ABNORMALITIES. They are the result of Imperial Europe's UNNATURAL urge to marry people outside their race. Race mixing is a curse. No wonder why South America and the Philippines have high crime rates. Their ancestors have been practicing mixed race marriages. RACIAL SEGREGATION and BANNING INTERRACIAL MARRIAGES are the best solutions to prevent the increase in crime rates.
@maypakialam Most racial hybridization has happned because European soldiers and settlers in the colonies did not have access to European women and thus raped or took on native women as wives as replacements for euro women out of sexual frustration. Notice that in colonies that had equal male to female ratios among whites mixed marriages were rare.
I have read that mixed race people are more likely to be criminals but I think that the cause for that needs to be investigated.
@maypakialam I do agree that mixed marriages should not be encouraged as they are not a good thing for the couples themselves generally, because some mixed couples are really happy for long periods of time however they ar the minority. But mixed relationships are even worse for the children as mixed children have more health problems and higher suicide rates among other problems.
This is an interesting vidoe on this topic:
"Racism is Natural - part 13 (interracial marriage, dating, etc)"
It proves that racism is innate since childhood. If racism is normal, then tribalism is normal. Interracial marriages and being multiracial are NOT normal and detrimental to human survival. Countries with mixed race are some of the most dangerous countries in the world, e.g.: South American countries and the Philippines.
We should BRING BACK racial segregation to lessen the crime rates
Keep in mind that groups differ in average intelligence. I'd recommend you read Robert Weinberg's MIT biology lecture. You can find it on Professor Steve Hsu's blog under "forbidden thoughts'. East Asians and Ashkenazi jews have the highest average scores hence their overrepresentation in the professions.
I'd also refer people to an excellent debate of the peer reviewed literature in the June 2005 issue of Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 11, No. 2 (easily found on the net).
She's not racist. Those who attack her are not so stupid as to not recognize this.
.
When we made psychology a mandatory prerequisite in college, we got a nation of assholes who play head-games even when their job is shoveling shit.
When we started encouraging and forcing high school kids to take debate classes on a wider scale, we got assholes who like to go online and spend all day dissecting the words of other people, without really saying anything substantial.
You can tell yourself what you want but racism exists. 'Racial preferences' is not racism. You can find ambiguity in many definitions. This is because reality came first & language came later.
The jews are the ones behind multiculturalism,political correctness and open border policies in Europe and America with the intent of flooding our countries with millions of third worlders and destroying the European race...
I really hope people would name the songs they use. It is easy to find a song that has words in it, but these instrumentals are a bitch. What is the name of the song that starts at 1:12? Anyone? Someone? Black, green, blue, yellow, white, I don't care, if you have the knowledge, I will love you.
It proves that racism is innate since childhood. If racism is normal, then tribalism ormal. Interracial marriages and being multiracial are NOT normal and detrimental to human survival. Countries with mixed race are some of the most dangerous countries in the world, e.g.: South American countries and the Philippines.
We should BRING BACK racial segregation to lessen the crime rates.
@maypakialam Simply because something is natural does not mean that it is good and should be done. However working against nature is bad too.
In the case of racial preferences we can see from statistics that people overwhelmingly date and marry within the races and that mixed marriages are more likely to end in divorce and more likely to ave home violence (5 times more.)
I think it is best for people to choose for themselves what to do and who to be with. I want to live with fellow whites.
@JakeBenzTV1 Below are examples of genetic ABNORMALITIES:
1.) Latino Americans (mix of native South Americans, Spanish, Portuguese and African)
2.) Filipinos (Malay, Indonesian, Chinese, Indian, Arab and a little bit of Spanish)
3.) French Polynesians
European have also intermarried with the people in their Asian colonies, e.g. French marrying Vietnamese, Spaniards marrying South Americans, etc. thus the demise of their empires. We should learn from the mistakes of our ancestors.
Btw - we shouldn't have to "justify" being racialistic or White Suprmacist in anyway. Why should we? America is a EUROPEAN COUNTRY! As are all the other European founded countries! We have the absolute moral right to restore these countries to any level of European supremacy as we like, just as any non-European people have the right to assert their racial and cultural primacy in their territories!
How fucking dare they even suggest otherwise!! If they don't like it they can fuck off or die!
"Racism" only entered into the English Oxford dictionary in 1971 and is actually a corruption of the term "racialism", which simply means to apply one's politics on the basis of racial differences.
It's a made up word just like the term "scientology" is made up and doesn't really mean anything, except maybe something like "witch", "monster", "heretic" or "social deviant."
They're trying the same thing with the term "White Supremacist" now, to make it "White Supreme-ist..."
@EuropeanWatchman All words were created at one time or another. Just because a word has a recent origin doesn't mean it has no meaning. You don't like the word so you want to get rid of it. That's what this is really all about.
I think it would be such a interesting project. To ask people if they see racism and then ask what it means. Screaming racism is like teaching a dog to bark. So much barking for the barking mad.
@cabadejo I've seen the documentary before. Their approach is rather predictable. Give a couple of interviews and then stress the difference in answer between the people being interviewed. Make sure to edit in the strangest answers (e.g. Someone using homophobia as an example of racism). Using Wikipedia for a formal definition of a word rather than a proper dictionary seems like an intentionally deceptive tactic. This strategy is called confirmation bias.
I don't need to "get rid" of a word like "racism", in the same way I don't need to "get rid" of a word like "scientology" or "Islamo-Fascism"; because all those terms never really existed because none ever had any real coherent meaning. That's what's "really going on here."
@EuropeanWatchman Your persistent denial that the word has a coherent meaning indicates that you feel it is important to deny or get rid of the word. If the word truly had no real world application why bother spending time rejecting it? You do it because you see its use as a threat. The reality is that the word is used in the modern world and has a coherent meaning. You can deny it all you want but that won't stop people from using it or defining it when challenged to.
Anyone who thinks that simply by using a particular made-up term as an example of a particular phenomenon that that somehow means that they are therefore by the very implication of doing so attributing the term in question with a particular coherent meaning, doesn't understand how the English language works.
I don't deny that the word "racism" is used, I deny its coherent utility within meaningful language.
@EuropeanWatchman All words are at one time or another made up. Every single one. The way all language works is that you invent a word to describe something and eventually that word gains currency in society. Racism is a real word. You can find it in every modern dictionary. It has an etymology and it has a coherent meaning. You can use it in a sentence and most literate people will understand its meaning. Racism is hatred or intolerance based on race.
Oh really? - Because most the post-1971 dictionaries I've ever read just define racism as ANY belief in racial difference amounting to an unequal standard of value being attributed to one race over another, which is kind of stupid since all racial characteristics have different values to different people and indeed all characteristics in the universe in general, have different values to different people and for different reasons.
@EuropeanWatchman Racism usually implies a belief in racial superiority based on the view that race determines cultural characteristics and this belief is used as a basis for discrimination. But if we use some common sense here you don't need to believe in racial differences to discriminate. You can discriminate based on anything or simply for the sake of doing it. Racism is a form of bigotry. It's racial bigotry. No amount of argument by repetition invalidates this logic.
2:50 The difficulty with accepting such an argument (species protection, which it seems you refer to in the video) is that the argument can apply anywhere: eye color, nose shape, hair color, height, health, sexuality, gender roles, all aspects of human characteristics.
I actually downloaded this thats how good it is.lol.Just in case you know..They may remove it out of the fact that it just makes alittle to much since.
oh, ya... you finally realized how many people think your a racist crazy bitch? great! you can stop posting now! you fucking delusional race idealist piece of shit garbage
@HeyRuka Me too. I Lol at how inconsistent these egalitarian/cultural marxists, I mean uhh "critical theorists" are. "*racist* *bitch** go kill yourself l on top of being racist your stupidity knows no limits ! FUCK YOU ! FUCK YOUR BELIEFS ! AND FUCK ALL YOUR RACIST SHIT COMMENTS YOU IGNORANT STUPID *BITCH!*"
Ohh, it's totally fine to be misogynist if it's a "privileged" white woman.
How the fuck does this have so many thumbs down? Are that many people racist against whites? Every race naturally loves itself. Take a look at your friend if you are white I'm betting the majority are white. Loving your race is natural and inherent in each of them. Whites are the only race that can be conditioned to hate their own and look at people who love their race as evil.
how can you pretend you're not racist? in your video you implied that blacks were inferior, and you said that we should all be divided by countries or even NATIONS, which is saying that you don't want anything to do with any other race but your own and that you want to be divided from them. if that's not racist then i don't know what is
@LINDSAYLIKEOMG Oh no! How dare a white person call for sovereignty from immigration and multiculturalism! How dare a white person call for a homogeneous nation! How dare a white person defend their own race and culture and heritage! That's waisis!
You're the one suggesting that blacks are inferior. I never implied it nor declared it. My position is not hatred towards others, but love for my kin. oh no that's....that's racist...
1. a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2. : racial prejudice or discrimination.
Accept who you are, hun... I know you do not wish for the negative social stigma of "racist", but it is who you are and you're just making a fool of yourself in denying it. Discrimination and segregation are inherently racist.
It is like the claim that I hate all other children just because I love my own children and prefer them.
Some, with a social axe to grind, willingly cannot extrapolate to larger groups even though they irrationally prefer some-or-another sports team over others to whom, they have no connection that can be discerned.
Fair enough!So,let us all(whites,blacks, Asians) leave US and let the native Indians have their sovereign United states.After all,it's their homeland and their homogeneity has been disrupted by Europeans right?Let us all move back to where we came from.
Like that,every race can have their homogeneous nation free from multiculturalism.
@metalskull1986 Prove it. Prove that indians were here first.
They all came here long ago from asia and it is unknown if there ever was any other races before them that they might have chased away or killed, so America is not theirs.
Besides, if Europeans would have stayed in Europe, you know what North America would be like today. Just like Africa.
Also, what makes you think that if Europeans would have stayed in Europe, that non-white immigrants wouldn't invade like today?
Indians are the ones that inhabited this land first.I don't know if anyone refuted to that.So,it's their land.If it's not their land then even Europe is not the land of Caucasians since you moved out of Africa and inhabited it.Dude,we can go on and on.
The point i'm making is...colonization,slavery,encroachment etc. were things of the past...none has right to say a particular race or religion has to move away who have been living here for a long time just as you.
@metalskull1986 The way you write tells me that you are not white and that you are against us, so that makes you an anti-white. So you lost your credibility. Besides, you didn't even answer my question with a valid response, because you don't have any. You just suppose things based on your beliefs of what is morally right.
And while MAYBE caucasians moved from afwica, they certainly didn't share the exact same traits with negroids. Therefore, races do exist. Subspecies of humans
Which part of my comment suggested that i'm anti-white?did i say "kill 'em all white people" or something?nobody is begging for your credibility.I did answer your point.Indians are the first inhabitants so that makes america their land.Forget about it.Blacks have been here for as long as america has been discovered and inhabited by Europeans as they brought blacks here from Africa.So,they are very much part of this land as you are isn't it?
I'm only opposed to your idea that all non-whites should leave america which is absurd,irrational and inhumane.I'm not talking about existence of race,that's a secondary issue.I do believe that races exist,subspecies as you said but the difference is very feeble that it is not a determinant in an individual's characteristics.Any person of any race put into an environment would live accordingly at least conforming to the common traits of the community.
@metalskull1986 Also, by your logic that Indians were first in America, Whites were first in Europe, so I don't get what non-whites are doing in Europe??!! Even if Europeans wouldn't have conquered America and stayed in Europe, non-whites would still have invaded Europe because the Zionists biggest obstacle is the European White man, so they would have done everything against them by allowing mass immigration by third world countries and promote race mixing, just like now.
@LINDSAYLIKEOMG Why do you feel this need to surround yourself with other races? If the white race is to continue to exist it must have some area of land where it is a protected super majority. If you want to surround yourself with other races that is your right and any pro-white person would acknowledge that but you seem to be unable to acknowledge our natural right to live with our own kind and you wonder why we dislike you.
@LINDSAYLIKEOMG Do you even know how diversity came about?Whos says we should not engage with other races just because we prefer to live in a homogenus society?China is the new emerging economy and superpower and they are a homogenus country....do you see China,Japan importing tens of millions of mexicans,negros,muslims,etc into their country?Are they racist?So are you saying you are against tibet for tibetans?Do you even have a brain capable of literal,lateral,logical,critical and common sense.
@MrAussiebloke76 I have been to China, they aren't homogeneous. The main ethnic group is the Han. They are the ones in charge. When I was in Beijing, in Tiananmen Square, there were groups of people who were Oriental but not like the Han. The guide said they were from way outside Beijing. I got the feeling the Han saw them as 2nd class. They looked at me like I was an alien and wanted photos with my (blonde) daughters, it was like they had never seen a Westerner before, well not in the flesh.
@LINDSAYLIKEOMG I have not seen the video you mention, but I have seen clips ridiculing it - so I will view it soon. I have gay neighbours on both sides. One side I rent out to the gay couple, one is mixed race. The family over the road are Asian (UK=Pakistani/Indian). I am friends with him. I don't mind either way, actually I like it like that. BUT what if you didn't and you preferred people from your own ethnic group? Are you racist? No you are not. It is your choice and no more.
@LINDSAYLIKEOMG I'm not a racist either. I had a black friend once. We were going to break out of a juvenile detention facility and hitch-hike to New Orelans. Then he stole my cigarettes and I kicked his ass and he snitched on me so I called him the n-word. Later, I went to jail and had another black friend for a few weeks. But then they moved some white people I knew and some black people he knew into our cellblock and we all quickly divided along racial lines. See, I'm not a racist...
"Races exist: That is not racist" -- Anthropologists will tell you that "race" is a term that we invented and that it in fact does NOT exist. All homo sapiens are of ONE race.
@Inari1987 Species is a term invented, so is the number "1", let's just erase all things man made interpretations of the natural world 'cause it's dumb, right? Which are these overwhelmingly agreeing anthropologists? All humans one race? That's a newly invented twisted definition, skip that to.
@Inari1987 I could, or i could simply be proven wrong with some correct arguments. But i doubt those can be your own earnest thoughts in all honesty, if you can't even defend or prove them.
@squidavenger You know how some people use a skull shape to say so-and-so is in a certain race? In one comparison I know of from ancient Nubian skeletons, they came up with results that had practically all of their individuals come from all over the globe. --Also, skulls can vary in shape in a SINGLE person throughout his life. I.e., it is not true that skulls have relevant differences between races. That is one argument right there.
@Inari1987 Might as well been slaves from many different places, or what not. One such example doesn't really say much, minor deviating examples can be found everywhere and always. Though, i have not brought up skulls as a sole argument for race, although certainly skull forms varies generally amongst the human races. How about race specified medicine then, that's a realistic pointer, isn't it? (Search for BiDil, a heart medicine specified for blacks)
@squidavenger It's not just one example. I only gave you one. There is also Kennewik Man, a 9000 year old skeleton from Washington state. Some tried to say its features were European, and therefore Europeans were in America at the time... But there are also full blood Indians (with no European DNA) that have the exact same features...so therefore they are also European? Wes Studi (A Cherokee actor) has those features, but he is certainly of no European descent.
@Inari1987 An article on si.edu (smithsonian) called "Paleoamerican Origins" suggests that europeans might've been among the early NA populations or that the ainu people (with similarities in facial structures to euros) from Japan. We still don't have DNA from him anyways. As for that Wes Studi, mate he has some features akin to European but here's far from any "pureblood" european ive ever seen (being euro and living in europe myself), he's a typical indian.
@Inari1987 As for the race specific medicine which you haven't responded to yet, how come they make racially tailored medicine if no such thing exists? Kind of pointless making medicine for something nonexistant, eh?
@squidavenger I didn't cover that because I don't know much about medicine, so it's better not to talk about something I have no knowledge about. Some it can probably be explained by habits that some groups may tend to have, cultural perhaps, perhaps not. Some of it may also be more associated with geography.
@Inari1987 Neither do i, yet if a medicine is specific for blacks or as they write it "african-americans" due to their unique needs due to their racial genetic makeup, and well, that's a pretty strong indication for race. You just can't explain away a fact, i don't even see the point in you trying to fight something inevitably existing. By all means, keep your ultra-egalitarian views if you like, but im calling it quits aslong as you can't admit simply facts. Thanks for the discussion
@Hasmond If you'd actually read my previous comments you'd find ive already written down the medicine's name. The name of it is BiDil, it has a website with the very same name with information. So there's my "bullshit", so get your facts straight and learn some manners, asshole.
@EgalitarianJay I quote from the article, "This of course means, if all other factors were equal, that more “whites” should have less elastic arterioles than “blacks.” If so, BiDil should help whites more than blacks". They are admitting that whites would then benefit most from this medicine if one equalizes enviromental factors. Hm, a pretty sound argument For racial differences, ain't it?
@squidavenger No because it's still not a racial drug. All it means is that when environmental factors are controlled Whites are statistically more likely to be helped by the drug. Atleast some Whites. For race-based medicine to be valid you would need to establish that there are significant evolutionary differences that determine some essential genetic traits of a population. In humans there is more genetic variation within continental populations than between them.
@EgalitarianJay So you deny it being a racial drug, yet you say that whites (a race) would generally benefit more from it than blacks (another race), and this not being due to enviroment since its being controlled? That deppends on which groups one is comparing, all populations in Africa can't for example be regarded as of one race, north Africans have alot more in common with Europeans for example. And so you admit that there are these populations then, also called races..
@squidavenger It depends on which populations are being sampled. Not all Europeans are the same. White and Black are social designations based on skin color generalized for populations that are culturally and genetically diverse. North Africans do not have more in common with Europeans either from a cultural or biological perspective. There are more lighter-skinned North Africans but Supra-Saharan Africans like Egyptians and Libyans are linked to Sub-Saharans via the Pn2 clade.
@squidavenger It depends on which populations are being sampled. Not all Europeans are the same. White and Black are social designations based on skin color generalized for populations that are culturally and genetically diverse. North Africans do not have more in common with Europeans either from a cultural or biological perspective. There are more lighter-skinned North Africans but Supra-Saharan Africans like Egyptians and Libyans are linked to Sub-Saharans via the Pn2 clade.
@squidavenger It depends on which populations are being sampled. Not all Europeans are the same. White and Black are social designations based on skin color generalized for populations that are culturally and genetically diverse. North Africans do not have more in common with Europeans either from a cultural or biological perspective. There are more lighter-skinned North Africans but Supra-Saharan Africans like Egyptians and Libyans are linked to Sub-Saharans via the Pn2 clade.
@EgalitarianJay If US blacks in large differ in enviroments which preexpose them to heart failure (due to culture or whatnot) is not very relevant when they themselves admit that whites would be benifited most by this drug and in turn pointing to genetic differences. Article ends with aknowledgement of genetic variation in regions and "The overall amount of measured human genetic variation, however, is very small", and this "very small" is likely a very subjective interpretation.
@squidavenger It's not a subjective interpretation it's based on empirical genetic research. No credible scientist denies that there is genetic variation. When it comes to whether biological races exist it must be understood that there are biological definitions of race that can scientifically investigated and there are social definitions of race which vary from region to region and culture to culture. I can send you a link by that author who discusses this in detail.
@EgalitarianJay In that sentence he does not describe how much this variation is nor how much "very small" is defined as, this makes it a subjective statement as he does not provide us with anything else than his own conclusion without allowing an objective overview of his train of thought. If i would say the statue of liberty is tiny to someone who's never seen it, should he take my word for it or actually see it for himself and make an objective judgement?
@squidavenger Basically you're saying you want more info to verify for yourself what he is talking about. If that is the case I can send you a full length article where he discusses it in detail. If you request it I will send a link via PM.
@EgalitarianJay Id preffer it if you yourself pointed out the evidence for such a statement, or atleast reffere me to where exactly this can be found. Rather that you back up your own standpoint then for me needing to drudge through an entire article.
@EgalitarianJay And yes, mixing definitions can be quite troublesome, yet, denying (biological)race due to some cultural ambiguious definitions regarding race will not help enlighten anyone and will only provide more confusion.
@squidavenger There is a semantic dispute over the proper definition of race which leads to confusion as it is. Scientists have attempted to settle this dispute and come to a reliable and testable definition. Many have argued that there are no biological races and they draw this conclusions based on a scientifically defined definition of race. This is also discussed in the article I am recommending that you read.
@EgalitarianJay Such a reliable definition i would gladly like to hear, if you'd be willing to clarify which it is? I myself have always used the standard subspecies/race definition, which can be found at thefreedictionary website.
@squidavenger Yes, Race = Subspecies. Subspecies definitions: ""Subspecies are groups of actually or potentially interbreeding populations phylogenetically distinguishable from, but reproductively compatible with, other such groups. Importantly the evidence for phylogenetic distinction must normally come from the concordant distributions of multiple, independent, genetically based traits." (Avis and Ball 1990)
@EgalitarianJay And a variation of 15% between groups is strictly not sufficient for a subspecies classification, then? Comparing populations can variate alot deppending on which of these are compared, which populations are being compared may i ask, and if you will, could you link me and article of which you quote this from? And furthermore, measuring alot of individuals within a group is bound to give higher variation, especially if compared to clustered population groups.
@squidavenger The within group variation of genetic polymorphisms for continental human populations is greater than 85% leaving only about 15% of total genetic variation between populations. This means that in terms of genetic similarity two people of different continental ancestry can be more genetically similar to each other than people of the same continental ancestry meaning there are no genetic boundaries that distinguish these populations phylogenetically.
@EgalitarianJay Can be more genetically similar, But is that chance very high? A high polymorphic variation within a group surely doesn't entail overwhelmingly polymorphic similarity between two seperate groups? As for your feature video, it sure seems neutral stating something as "illusionary" already in its title..
@squidavenger The major genetic differentiation within the human species being within continental populations indicates that there are no breeding populations with distinct genetic markers that distinguish those populations from others (i.e. no phylogenetic distinctions). The feature video is an educational video which intends to provide information about misconceptions and myths concerning race. The no biological races position is mainstream science.
@EgalitarianJay Most races are geographically bound, and most individuals within a race interbreed with their own kin, do they not? No distinct genetic markers, then what was the 15% disparity between the populations about? When precisely is the race category valid, at 20%? Also, could you reffer me to that in-out group genetic variation source? Well, drinking is pretty mainstream to, but im not subscribing for conformity.
@EgalitarianJay So the arguments against race is that the genetics in the racial group group is to diverse? Rainbows which have plenty of diverse colours, is it then no longer a rainbow, due to its high "in group" diversity? To me it seems they're attacking the concept of race then anything else. Their little euphemism 'populations' seems even more ambigious then that of 'race', certainly one can reffer to alot of things as populations.
@EgalitarianJay Consensus in the spirit of the Conceptualizing human variation article? Where they'll denounce race as valid biologic taxonomy, yet use the even more vague word "population"?
@squidavenger That paper does support the consensus, yes. How is population a vague word? It simply means a group of people residing in a given area. People can be grouped many different ways. Noone denies that there are populations with genetic similarity.
@EgalitarianJay The precise word of race which defines the attributes of a certain population and the subject at hand can be understood more precisely. It is an outright stupid dilutement of the subject and a intellectual downgrade, not to surprised if all this has an egalitarian agenda. You might not deny that, but race seems impossible for you to accept, even though it's there in a watered down "populations".
@squidavenger It's not impossible for me to accept. Infact I accepted it without question for most of my life and still had an Egalitarian mindset before I heard scientific arguments about what race means and why it doesn't accurately describe human genetic variation. Learning its origins and how the term itselfs is rooted in racial bigotry I reject it as a valid classification on scientific grounds. But my main interested is social equality not scientific classifications.
@EgalitarianJay It it is not, then why deny it? 'Populations' is just a silly euphemism, and the critera for race seems pretty valid for me so far, you not pointing out the precise scientific explanation of why there aren't races, either. As far as i know, the word race originated from something akin to today's 'ethnicity'. I woulden't be surprised if your egalitarianism requires the denial of races just to make the belief acceptable to oneself, either way, thanks for the debate.
@squidavenger The feature video for my channel illustrates this with genetic testing and what this means for the concept of biological races and human genetic diversity in general.
What you have to realize is that the WHITE ANGLO-ELITES in charge of the countries of Greater Anglosphere have contrived to lead into our countries massive numbers of non-White immigrants in failed attempt to DESTROY the White indigenous people of our countries. BUT....by doing so they have only made these countries, and perforce, themselves less powerful because third world countries are always backward and powerless. Russia and the other White countries have beaten the anglo-elites
We have actual evidence of the elites in charge of Greater Anglosphere post World War Two. We have it on very good authority these vile anti-White elites formulated an outradeous explicit plan to force-assimilate White people out of existence. Understand...if you lead into a country racially dissimilar people to blend the receiving race out of existence, you are committing a program of genocide by force-assimilation.
If you try to alter another race genetically....GENOCIDE!!!
It is only in White countries that this anti-racism is being perpetrated and forced upon the people...White people and our children. In other words, we are alleging that the WHITE ANGLO-ELITES AND THEIR ANTI-RACIST COLLABORATORS have systematically targeted by intentional programs of massive non-White immigration, forced integration, and racial assimilation into the non-White immigrant peoples. This is genocide...White Genocide and it needs to be stopped and punished
The Genocide is characterized by the second oldest and probably most successful method known to humankind: force-assimilate a given population by leading massive numbers of racially dissimilar people into their country(s); then force-integrate these populations; then spend massive amounts of funds psycho-socially re-engineering trying to get the original population feel compelled to racially assimilate with the incoming population.That is genocide and has been forced on White people
Moreover, White countries belong to the indigenous White peoples of those countries, we have absolutely no obligation to give anyone outside of our countries any kind of non-discriminatory acknowledgement whatsoever. Again, because you are a flaming anti-White, you still don't understand that our countries are for our people, just as Asia is for the Asians, Africa for the Africans. We deserve preferential treatment in our own homelands.
And White people in White countries are literally being forced to accept, obviously against their will the demand that they integrate and intermarry with the non-White immigrants that have been led into our countries and ONLY into our countries.Don't believe me??
You will be condemned for racism if you oppose intermarriage. In most White country you can go to jail for racism.
The government protects the right to be anti-white but tries to do away with the right to be pro-white.
When your people and their children have been the target of trillions of dollars of psychosocial re-engineering to make them hate and disown their own race, such as White people from birth have.
When ONLY your continent has its borders broken down so that massive numbers of non-Whites can be led into your country, such as happened to ONLY White countries,
You begin to feel as if you are being systematically targeted
DIVERSITY IS A CODEWORD FOR THE PROGRAM OF WHITE GENOCIDE!
DIVERSITY AND MULTICULTURALISM ARE CODEWORDS FOR THE PROGRAM OF WHITE GENOCIDE THAT THE ANTI-RACISTS AND THEIR ANTI-WHITE ANGLO-ELITE MASTERS HAVE IMPOSED UPON THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF EUROPE!!!
ANTI-RACIST IS A CODEWORD FOR ANTI-WHITE
YOU SAY YOU ARE ANTI-RACIST, WHAT YOU REALLY ARE IS ANTI-WHITE!!!
Tell me is this, or is this not, a distraction from a true goal of social darwinism? you do of course realize that this racial segregation thing will NEVER happen. Never. Granted, you aren't the brightest, but I find it hard to believe even you can't see that this is an impossibility. The sick are much more easily portrayed as expendable. they are not beneficial to the economy and to people like you that's all that really matters isn't it?
@FnPgt In other words I have finally caught one of you filthy anti-Whites with your own words...AGAIN. Essentially, you are here publicly acknowleging, justifying, and advocating for the system of White Genocide-by-Assimilation that I and other White Dissidents have been fighting against. You are in essence admitting that you are nothing more than a genocidal freak against White children, EVEN IF YOU ARE A WHITE PERSON.
ANTI-RACIST IS JUST A CODEWORD FOR ANTI-WHITE HATRED.
@EvolutionNeverHappen i gots me a video in my faves of a fish dat say "allah" main... even da fishes no more bout da worl den yo EvolutionNeverHappen ass... take dat main!
Asia for the Asians. Africa for the Africans. White countries for everybody. It isn't an African problem. Nobody is flooding Africa with non-Africans and giving them affirmative action, special rights and privileges and free health care. Only white countries are doing this. Only white leaders are supporting this. Only white children are suffering from it. It is genocide.
@Formulaone21 South Africa apartheid.. white minority govt control over majoring black population, given special rights and privileged.. also.. its not like people of other backgrounds not allowed in Asian countries, look at the UAE huge foreign population.
The Japanese have genocided the indigenous Ainu population of the 'Japanese' Islands. The Ainu were there thousands of years before the Asians in the form of the Japanese arrived and started displacing, and assimilating them out of existence. But you anti-Whites don't demand that they allow into their country non-Asian immigrants to make a blended humanity in Japan and ONLY Japan. But this is being perpetrated upon White countries and ONLY White countries. YOU WANT WHITE GENOCIDE
The Zulus in Africa conquered and nearly wiped out the Hottentots.
But nobody says the Africans need to accept millions of non-Black people for this.
Do we hear governments, the mass media, and academia and their anti-racist lackeys calling for Africa to bring in millions of non-African people and assimilate with them because they did this?
People say this about ALL White countries and ONLY White countries
@Formulaone21 god, who would want to, a cursory review of richard lynn's global IQ charts is MORE than enough for me... i don't need to know they have much worse sexual disease rates, much higher crime rates, etc...
i have fantasies of battles in history i would like to change, and i do it racially based on the IQ of both sides, the sharpest contrast of any one major battle i can think of was in the Anglo-Zulu War:
The Battle of Isandlwana
just a few hundred AK-47s, if even, were needed...
Do we hear governments, the mass media, and academia calling for Japan to bring in millions of non-Japanese people and assimilate with them because they're "not diverse enough"?
Why are they doing this in ALL and ONLY White countries?
No one says a neighborhood that is 100% black needs more diversity.
No one says a neighborhood that is 100% asian needs more diversity.
No one says a neighborhood that is 100% oriental needs more diversity.
They are already 100% diverse.
All white neighborhoods and only white neighborhoods always need to be more diverse. White neighborhoods only stop needing to be more diverse when there are no white people left in them.
If ALL and ONLY Black countries in 1965 were forced by their treasonous eltes to open their borders and let hundreds of millions of non-Blacks into their countries, and then 90 years later, Blacks are expected to be minorities in the countries that let non-Blacks in; that's not done by accident. It's obviously a plan to wipe out the Black race. AKA genocide.
People say there is a RACE problem. People say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY and ONLY into white countries.
People say the only solution to the RACE problem is if EVERY and ONLY white countries “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against White people, Anti-Whites agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
We have massive immigration into all white countries, and it is only being forced on white countries. We have forced integration of all these non-whites. Anti-whites call themselves anti-racists and promote intermarriage and condemn people who oppose intermarriage. And then they talk about a brown future in formerly white countries.
YOU ANTI-WHITES are part of this program of genocide against my race, the white race.
We must never protect White people in their view. They are anti-white.
It is only in White countries that this anti-racism is being perpetrated and forced upon the people...White people and our children. In other words, we are alleging that the WHITE ANGLO-ELITES AND THEIR ANTI-RACIST COLLABORATORS have systematically targeted by intentional programs of massive non-White immigration, forced integration, and racial assimilation into the non-White immigrant peoples. This is genocide...White Genocide and it needs to be stopped and punished!
The political decision to open the floodgates to non-White immigration (w/ out a popular vote) WAS deliberate. The political decision to force integrate White neighborhoods was deliberate. The political decision to put out PSAs that encourage interracial coupling was deliberate.
Don’t kid yourself. It doesn’t have to be immediate killing to be genocide under the law. It only need be INTENT that there be fewer Whites coupled with an ACT
@Formulaone21 Well they still had the option of voting for parties which would have halted immigration, been a few over the years. But they didn't, they voted for the parties which they KNEW would allow immigrants in, so yes, the people gave their consent. Democracy at work mate. In the future they may vote for a party which will kick 'em all out again, but it ain't likely.
@Beelzeboogie First of all, the law which instituted massive non-White immigration was not assented to by the indigenous people at large. As usual, it was brought in under stealth and political chacanery. The sponsors of the law are on record admitting that they knew that the indigenous Brits would not allow it if it was put to any kind of vote. Second, you have to understand the massive psychological conditioning that has been perpetrated upon White children to stop them from resisting this.
@Beelzeboogie Moreover, you are missing a very important point here. Whether our people are allowed to vote on this measure is irrelevant to the actual crime that has been committed. The fact is that the WHITE anglo-elites are on record as articulating a plan to bring in massive numbers of non-White immigrants within the very democratic mechanisms that you have alluded to and, thus, racially assimilate White people out of existence forever. Their objective was and still is GENOCIDAL! TRIBUNAL!!!
@Formulaone21 But it's not on record is it! You said it yourself that it wasn't a matter of public record! Secret files and all that! You've seen these documents yourself I presume?
@Beelzeboogie The proof is on record. We have the goods on these vile creatures. Our side will bring this proof to the public when we finally have a system of tribunals to deal legally with these characters.
ANTI-RACIST IS JUST A CODEWORD FOR ANTI-WHITE
MULTICULTURALISM AND DIVERSITY ARE JUST CODEWORDS FOR THE SYSTEM OF WHITE GENOCIDE-BY-ASSIMILATION THAT HAS BEEN FORCED UPON WHITE PEOPLE AND OUR CHILDREN.
@Beelzeboogie Aah, I have finally publicly 'outed' you in a sense. You have finally implicitly admitted that there is indeed a program to bring in massive amounts of non-Whites into Britain,and other White countries, and ONLY White countries. You've implicitly agreed with my orginal assertion that there is indeed a measure that has been implemented by the anglo-elites to lead into that country non-White peoples in an attempt to make the indigenous Whites of Britain a racial minority there
@Formulaone21 Oh for gods sake It was a hypothetical situation. I stated that even IF we (meaning tha anglo-elites which I assume you think I am a part of) planned to literally force black folks to move into the country and IF we brainwashed everyone to fuck them, theirs still no guilty party. It'd be like blaming the person who left the knife lying around in the kitchen when somebody stabs themselves with it.
@Beelzeboogie Indeed, there is a guilty party, that being those who financed, articulated, financed, and orchistrated this attempted genocide. What you and your other anti-racist(read anti-White) cohorts don't understand is that you cannot within the scope of International law systematically target a specific population for any kind of genetic alteration with the intent to destroy that population. That is what has been attempted by these very WHITE anglo-elites.
@Formulaone21 Let's go back to these anglo-elites for a second. Since you claim it's happening in ALL white countries these guys must be in control of EVERY white country. Since you claim it's happening ONLY white countries, that implies that they are also in control of all black countries and all Asian countries since they COULD do it in these countries but choose not to,
So if i'm reading this right, there is a group that controls all government, all media and all technology in world. Right?
You're such a legend! XD
xXWhiteRabbitDannyXx 3 days ago
Latino Americans, French Polynesians and Filipinos are examples of GENETIC ABNORMALITIES. They are the result of Imperial Europe's UNNATURAL urge to marry people outside their race. Race mixing is a curse. No wonder why South America and the Philippines have high crime rates. Their ancestors have been practicing mixed race marriages. RACIAL SEGREGATION and BANNING INTERRACIAL MARRIAGES are the best solutions to prevent the increase in crime rates.
maypakialam 4 days ago
@maypakialam Most racial hybridization has happned because European soldiers and settlers in the colonies did not have access to European women and thus raped or took on native women as wives as replacements for euro women out of sexual frustration. Notice that in colonies that had equal male to female ratios among whites mixed marriages were rare.
I have read that mixed race people are more likely to be criminals but I think that the cause for that needs to be investigated.
JakeBenzTV1 4 days ago
@maypakialam I do agree that mixed marriages should not be encouraged as they are not a good thing for the couples themselves generally, because some mixed couples are really happy for long periods of time however they ar the minority. But mixed relationships are even worse for the children as mixed children have more health problems and higher suicide rates among other problems.
This is an interesting vidoe on this topic:
"Racism is Natural - part 13 (interracial marriage, dating, etc)"
JakeBenzTV1 4 days ago
@JakeBenzTV1 Should there be a law against mixed marriages? Should we bring back racial segregation?
"The end justified the means" -that's my philosophy.
maypakialam 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please watch the video below:
/watch?v=Eq1PDYB1G1U
It proves that racism is innate since childhood. If racism is normal, then tribalism is normal. Interracial marriages and being multiracial are NOT normal and detrimental to human survival. Countries with mixed race are some of the most dangerous countries in the world, e.g.: South American countries and the Philippines.
We should BRING BACK racial segregation to lessen the crime rates
maypakialam 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep in mind that groups differ in average intelligence. I'd recommend you read Robert Weinberg's MIT biology lecture. You can find it on Professor Steve Hsu's blog under "forbidden thoughts'. East Asians and Ashkenazi jews have the highest average scores hence their overrepresentation in the professions.
I'd also refer people to an excellent debate of the peer reviewed literature in the June 2005 issue of Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 11, No. 2 (easily found on the net).
GhostofBloomberg 1 week ago
She's not racist. Those who attack her are not so stupid as to not recognize this.
.
When we made psychology a mandatory prerequisite in college, we got a nation of assholes who play head-games even when their job is shoveling shit.
When we started encouraging and forcing high school kids to take debate classes on a wider scale, we got assholes who like to go online and spend all day dissecting the words of other people, without really saying anything substantial.
Let's go back to big sticks
benskin79 1 week ago
@george564as Proof?
DevilMayhem666 2 weeks ago
I was called a racist today and all I said was that Hispanic is not a race...
DevilMayhem666 2 weeks ago
You can tell yourself what you want but racism exists. 'Racial preferences' is not racism. You can find ambiguity in many definitions. This is because reality came first & language came later.
CO2Junkie 2 weeks ago
@CO2Junkie Bingo! Racial preference is NOT racism. :)
HeyRuka 2 weeks ago
The jews are the ones behind multiculturalism,political correctness and open border policies in Europe and America with the intent of flooding our countries with millions of third worlders and destroying the European race...
george564as 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
BlueGender79 3 weeks ago
I really hope people would name the songs they use. It is easy to find a song that has words in it, but these instrumentals are a bitch. What is the name of the song that starts at 1:12? Anyone? Someone? Black, green, blue, yellow, white, I don't care, if you have the knowledge, I will love you.
BlueGender79 3 weeks ago
@BlueGender79 Hi, that instrumental music is called "Alone in Kyoto" by Air. Enjoy :)
HeyRuka 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HeyRuka Crimeny, that was fast! Lots of thanks.
BlueGender79 3 weeks ago
@HeyRuka Please watch the video below:
/watch?v=Eq1PDYB1G1U
It proves that racism is innate since childhood. If racism is normal, then tribalism ormal. Interracial marriages and being multiracial are NOT normal and detrimental to human survival. Countries with mixed race are some of the most dangerous countries in the world, e.g.: South American countries and the Philippines.
We should BRING BACK racial segregation to lessen the crime rates.
maypakialam 1 week ago
@maypakialam Simply because something is natural does not mean that it is good and should be done. However working against nature is bad too.
In the case of racial preferences we can see from statistics that people overwhelmingly date and marry within the races and that mixed marriages are more likely to end in divorce and more likely to ave home violence (5 times more.)
I think it is best for people to choose for themselves what to do and who to be with. I want to live with fellow whites.
JakeBenzTV1 5 days ago
@JakeBenzTV1 Below are examples of genetic ABNORMALITIES:
1.) Latino Americans (mix of native South Americans, Spanish, Portuguese and African)
2.) Filipinos (Malay, Indonesian, Chinese, Indian, Arab and a little bit of Spanish)
3.) French Polynesians
European have also intermarried with the people in their Asian colonies, e.g. French marrying Vietnamese, Spaniards marrying South Americans, etc. thus the demise of their empires. We should learn from the mistakes of our ancestors.
maypakialam 4 days ago
Btw - we shouldn't have to "justify" being racialistic or White Suprmacist in anyway. Why should we? America is a EUROPEAN COUNTRY! As are all the other European founded countries! We have the absolute moral right to restore these countries to any level of European supremacy as we like, just as any non-European people have the right to assert their racial and cultural primacy in their territories!
How fucking dare they even suggest otherwise!! If they don't like it they can fuck off or die!
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
"Racism" only entered into the English Oxford dictionary in 1971 and is actually a corruption of the term "racialism", which simply means to apply one's politics on the basis of racial differences.
It's a made up word just like the term "scientology" is made up and doesn't really mean anything, except maybe something like "witch", "monster", "heretic" or "social deviant."
They're trying the same thing with the term "White Supremacist" now, to make it "White Supreme-ist..."
EuropeanWatchman 1 month ago
@EuropeanWatchman All words were created at one time or another. Just because a word has a recent origin doesn't mean it has no meaning. You don't like the word so you want to get rid of it. That's what this is really all about.
EgalitarianJay 2 weeks ago
@EgalitarianJay watch this /watch?v=g8B9bKFV0ns
The people did not even know what racism meant.
I think it would be such a interesting project. To ask people if they see racism and then ask what it means. Screaming racism is like teaching a dog to bark. So much barking for the barking mad.
cabadejo 2 weeks ago
@cabadejo I've seen the documentary before. Their approach is rather predictable. Give a couple of interviews and then stress the difference in answer between the people being interviewed. Make sure to edit in the strangest answers (e.g. Someone using homophobia as an example of racism). Using Wikipedia for a formal definition of a word rather than a proper dictionary seems like an intentionally deceptive tactic. This strategy is called confirmation bias.
EgalitarianJay 2 weeks ago
@EgalitarianJay
I don't need to "get rid" of a word like "racism", in the same way I don't need to "get rid" of a word like "scientology" or "Islamo-Fascism"; because all those terms never really existed because none ever had any real coherent meaning. That's what's "really going on here."
EuropeanWatchman 2 weeks ago
@EuropeanWatchman Your persistent denial that the word has a coherent meaning indicates that you feel it is important to deny or get rid of the word. If the word truly had no real world application why bother spending time rejecting it? You do it because you see its use as a threat. The reality is that the word is used in the modern world and has a coherent meaning. You can deny it all you want but that won't stop people from using it or defining it when challenged to.
EgalitarianJay 2 weeks ago
@EgalitarianJay
Anyone who thinks that simply by using a particular made-up term as an example of a particular phenomenon that that somehow means that they are therefore by the very implication of doing so attributing the term in question with a particular coherent meaning, doesn't understand how the English language works.
I don't deny that the word "racism" is used, I deny its coherent utility within meaningful language.
EuropeanWatchman 2 weeks ago
@EuropeanWatchman All words are at one time or another made up. Every single one. The way all language works is that you invent a word to describe something and eventually that word gains currency in society. Racism is a real word. You can find it in every modern dictionary. It has an etymology and it has a coherent meaning. You can use it in a sentence and most literate people will understand its meaning. Racism is hatred or intolerance based on race.
EgalitarianJay 2 weeks ago
@EgalitarianJay
Oh really? - Because most the post-1971 dictionaries I've ever read just define racism as ANY belief in racial difference amounting to an unequal standard of value being attributed to one race over another, which is kind of stupid since all racial characteristics have different values to different people and indeed all characteristics in the universe in general, have different values to different people and for different reasons.
Therefore "racism" is nonsense.
EuropeanWatchman 2 weeks ago
@EuropeanWatchman Racism usually implies a belief in racial superiority based on the view that race determines cultural characteristics and this belief is used as a basis for discrimination. But if we use some common sense here you don't need to believe in racial differences to discriminate. You can discriminate based on anything or simply for the sake of doing it. Racism is a form of bigotry. It's racial bigotry. No amount of argument by repetition invalidates this logic.
EgalitarianJay 2 weeks ago
@EgalitarianJay yaw beez rasiss
DollabiIIz2 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pro-White is code for Anti-Brown
NOVUSXIIIORDO 1 month ago
Terrible video.
crapObear2323 1 month ago
2:50 The difficulty with accepting such an argument (species protection, which it seems you refer to in the video) is that the argument can apply anywhere: eye color, nose shape, hair color, height, health, sexuality, gender roles, all aspects of human characteristics.
Bourtini 1 month ago
She is racist. Nuff said.
synchronium24 1 month ago
288 likes, 376 dislikes
yay, reasonable people win again, fuck racism.
opti95 1 month ago
Comment removed
DanishGreatDane 1 month ago in playlist More videos from HeyRuka
@opti95 this video was promoted on the channel of various pedophiles - Coughlan000 and gabiotta... troll invasion was expected ;)
DanishGreatDane 1 month ago in playlist More videos from HeyRuka
I actually downloaded this thats how good it is.lol.Just in case you know..They may remove it out of the fact that it just makes alittle to much since.
Phantom14ify 1 month ago
To be honest this is my favorite video on "topic" of race.Simply EXCELLENT!
Phantom14ify 1 month ago
Malcolm x thought the same thing until he went to Mecca, then they killed him. so..
NinjaBunnah 2 months ago
we simply need to stop thinking of other people as being black, white or asian, and start thinking of them as just people.
5oodings 2 months ago
Finally, a person with intellectual insight, and logic and reasoning before political agenda.
mechahalcon 2 months ago
America pretty much was somewhat homogeneous before white people came along. So maybe you should be the first to leave.
zperra 2 months ago in playlist More videos from HeyRuka 2
oh, ya... you finally realized how many people think your a racist crazy bitch? great! you can stop posting now! you fucking delusional race idealist piece of shit garbage
zumbadrum 2 months ago
Great video. Whites everywhere must come together and protect their own interests.
Skorzeny777 2 months ago 4
Lol, look at the little kiddies trying to play Mr. Science. Aren't they adorable?
Love this video. I just LOVE it when "intellectuals" get so disowned by the truth.
blacktigerpaw1 2 months ago in playlist More videos from HeyRuka
Comment removed
DollabiIIz2 2 months ago
Extinction for all Humans. Fuck this disgusting race!
DrDerpwerth 2 months ago
@DrDerpwerth You sound like a typical murderous freak. Get away from here.
ANTI-WHITE FREAK
Formulaone21 2 months ago
Damn. Forgot how fucking awesone this video is.
HeyRuka 2 months ago 2
@HeyRuka I have to stop it now and again as I don't read fast enough. Nice video.
cabadejo 2 months ago in playlist More videos from HeyRuka
@HeyRuka Me too. I Lol at how inconsistent these egalitarian/cultural marxists, I mean uhh "critical theorists" are. "*racist* *bitch** go kill yourself l on top of being racist your stupidity knows no limits ! FUCK YOU ! FUCK YOUR BELIEFS ! AND FUCK ALL YOUR RACIST SHIT COMMENTS YOU IGNORANT STUPID *BITCH!*"
Ohh, it's totally fine to be misogynist if it's a "privileged" white woman.
sticksquash 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@HeyRuka good choice of music
here it cooooooooooomes
Pigziggy 1 month ago
How the fuck does this have so many thumbs down? Are that many people racist against whites? Every race naturally loves itself. Take a look at your friend if you are white I'm betting the majority are white. Loving your race is natural and inherent in each of them. Whites are the only race that can be conditioned to hate their own and look at people who love their race as evil.
Luigi84289 2 months ago
A ray of light in the dark.
Ducky888888 2 months ago
how can you pretend you're not racist? in your video you implied that blacks were inferior, and you said that we should all be divided by countries or even NATIONS, which is saying that you don't want anything to do with any other race but your own and that you want to be divided from them. if that's not racist then i don't know what is
LINDSAYLIKEOMG 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LINDSAYLIKEOMG Oh no! How dare a white person call for sovereignty from immigration and multiculturalism! How dare a white person call for a homogeneous nation! How dare a white person defend their own race and culture and heritage! That's waisis!
You're the one suggesting that blacks are inferior. I never implied it nor declared it. My position is not hatred towards others, but love for my kin. oh no that's....that's racist...
HeyRuka 2 months ago 23
@HeyRuka
*cough* That is actually racist *cough*
Racism:
1. a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2. : racial prejudice or discrimination.
Accept who you are, hun... I know you do not wish for the negative social stigma of "racist", but it is who you are and you're just making a fool of yourself in denying it. Discrimination and segregation are inherently racist.
LovelesEntertainment 2 months ago in playlist More videos from HeyRuka
@HeyRuka You are quite right.
It is like the claim that I hate all other children just because I love my own children and prefer them.
Some, with a social axe to grind, willingly cannot extrapolate to larger groups even though they irrationally prefer some-or-another sports team over others to whom, they have no connection that can be discerned.
Nice job.
maxfirepower 2 months ago
@HeyRuka Nope, that's simply: Fanatical Nationalist
hatzifratzi 2 months ago
@HeyRuka
Fair enough!So,let us all(whites,blacks, Asians) leave US and let the native Indians have their sovereign United states.After all,it's their homeland and their homogeneity has been disrupted by Europeans right?Let us all move back to where we came from.
Like that,every race can have their homogeneous nation free from multiculturalism.
metalskull1986 1 month ago 2
@metalskull1986 Prove it. Prove that indians were here first.
They all came here long ago from asia and it is unknown if there ever was any other races before them that they might have chased away or killed, so America is not theirs.
Besides, if Europeans would have stayed in Europe, you know what North America would be like today. Just like Africa.
Also, what makes you think that if Europeans would have stayed in Europe, that non-white immigrants wouldn't invade like today?
ThrashingTornado1984 1 month ago
@ThrashingTornado1984
Indians are the ones that inhabited this land first.I don't know if anyone refuted to that.So,it's their land.If it's not their land then even Europe is not the land of Caucasians since you moved out of Africa and inhabited it.Dude,we can go on and on.
The point i'm making is...colonization,slavery,encroachment etc. were things of the past...none has right to say a particular race or religion has to move away who have been living here for a long time just as you.
metalskull1986 1 month ago
@metalskull1986 The way you write tells me that you are not white and that you are against us, so that makes you an anti-white. So you lost your credibility. Besides, you didn't even answer my question with a valid response, because you don't have any. You just suppose things based on your beliefs of what is morally right.
And while MAYBE caucasians moved from afwica, they certainly didn't share the exact same traits with negroids. Therefore, races do exist. Subspecies of humans
ThrashingTornado1984 1 month ago
@ThrashingTornado1984
Which part of my comment suggested that i'm anti-white?did i say "kill 'em all white people" or something?nobody is begging for your credibility.I did answer your point.Indians are the first inhabitants so that makes america their land.Forget about it.Blacks have been here for as long as america has been discovered and inhabited by Europeans as they brought blacks here from Africa.So,they are very much part of this land as you are isn't it?
metalskull1986 1 month ago
@ThrashingTornado1984
I'm only opposed to your idea that all non-whites should leave america which is absurd,irrational and inhumane.I'm not talking about existence of race,that's a secondary issue.I do believe that races exist,subspecies as you said but the difference is very feeble that it is not a determinant in an individual's characteristics.Any person of any race put into an environment would live accordingly at least conforming to the common traits of the community.
metalskull1986 1 month ago
@metalskull1986 Also, by your logic that Indians were first in America, Whites were first in Europe, so I don't get what non-whites are doing in Europe??!! Even if Europeans wouldn't have conquered America and stayed in Europe, non-whites would still have invaded Europe because the Zionists biggest obstacle is the European White man, so they would have done everything against them by allowing mass immigration by third world countries and promote race mixing, just like now.
ThrashingTornado1984 1 month ago
@ThrashingTornado1984 LMFAO
blacktigerpaw1 1 month ago in playlist More videos from HeyRuka
@LINDSAYLIKEOMG Why do you feel this need to surround yourself with other races? If the white race is to continue to exist it must have some area of land where it is a protected super majority. If you want to surround yourself with other races that is your right and any pro-white person would acknowledge that but you seem to be unable to acknowledge our natural right to live with our own kind and you wonder why we dislike you.
Luigi84289 2 months ago
@LINDSAYLIKEOMG Do you even know how diversity came about?Whos says we should not engage with other races just because we prefer to live in a homogenus society?China is the new emerging economy and superpower and they are a homogenus country....do you see China,Japan importing tens of millions of mexicans,negros,muslims,etc into their country?Are they racist?So are you saying you are against tibet for tibetans?Do you even have a brain capable of literal,lateral,logical,critical and common sense.
MrAussiebloke76 2 months ago
@MrAussiebloke76 I have been to China, they aren't homogeneous. The main ethnic group is the Han. They are the ones in charge. When I was in Beijing, in Tiananmen Square, there were groups of people who were Oriental but not like the Han. The guide said they were from way outside Beijing. I got the feeling the Han saw them as 2nd class. They looked at me like I was an alien and wanted photos with my (blonde) daughters, it was like they had never seen a Westerner before, well not in the flesh.
cabadejo 2 months ago in playlist More videos from HeyRuka
@LINDSAYLIKEOMG I have not seen the video you mention, but I have seen clips ridiculing it - so I will view it soon. I have gay neighbours on both sides. One side I rent out to the gay couple, one is mixed race. The family over the road are Asian (UK=Pakistani/Indian). I am friends with him. I don't mind either way, actually I like it like that. BUT what if you didn't and you preferred people from your own ethnic group? Are you racist? No you are not. It is your choice and no more.
cabadejo 2 months ago in playlist More videos from HeyRuka
@LINDSAYLIKEOMG I'm not a racist either. I had a black friend once. We were going to break out of a juvenile detention facility and hitch-hike to New Orelans. Then he stole my cigarettes and I kicked his ass and he snitched on me so I called him the n-word. Later, I went to jail and had another black friend for a few weeks. But then they moved some white people I knew and some black people he knew into our cellblock and we all quickly divided along racial lines. See, I'm not a racist...
DollabiIIz2 2 months ago
"Races exist: That is not racist" -- Anthropologists will tell you that "race" is a term that we invented and that it in fact does NOT exist. All homo sapiens are of ONE race.
Inari1987 3 months ago
@Inari1987 Species is a term invented, so is the number "1", let's just erase all things man made interpretations of the natural world 'cause it's dumb, right? Which are these overwhelmingly agreeing anthropologists? All humans one race? That's a newly invented twisted definition, skip that to.
squidavenger 3 months ago
@squidavenger All I'm going to say is take a cultural anthropology class. All your questions will be answered.
Inari1987 3 months ago
@Inari1987 I could, or i could simply be proven wrong with some correct arguments. But i doubt those can be your own earnest thoughts in all honesty, if you can't even defend or prove them.
squidavenger 3 months ago
@squidavenger You know how some people use a skull shape to say so-and-so is in a certain race? In one comparison I know of from ancient Nubian skeletons, they came up with results that had practically all of their individuals come from all over the globe. --Also, skulls can vary in shape in a SINGLE person throughout his life. I.e., it is not true that skulls have relevant differences between races. That is one argument right there.
Inari1987 3 months ago
@Inari1987 Might as well been slaves from many different places, or what not. One such example doesn't really say much, minor deviating examples can be found everywhere and always. Though, i have not brought up skulls as a sole argument for race, although certainly skull forms varies generally amongst the human races. How about race specified medicine then, that's a realistic pointer, isn't it? (Search for BiDil, a heart medicine specified for blacks)
squidavenger 3 months ago
@squidavenger It's not just one example. I only gave you one. There is also Kennewik Man, a 9000 year old skeleton from Washington state. Some tried to say its features were European, and therefore Europeans were in America at the time... But there are also full blood Indians (with no European DNA) that have the exact same features...so therefore they are also European? Wes Studi (A Cherokee actor) has those features, but he is certainly of no European descent.
Inari1987 3 months ago
@Inari1987 An article on si.edu (smithsonian) called "Paleoamerican Origins" suggests that europeans might've been among the early NA populations or that the ainu people (with similarities in facial structures to euros) from Japan. We still don't have DNA from him anyways. As for that Wes Studi, mate he has some features akin to European but here's far from any "pureblood" european ive ever seen (being euro and living in europe myself), he's a typical indian.
squidavenger 3 months ago
@Inari1987 As for the race specific medicine which you haven't responded to yet, how come they make racially tailored medicine if no such thing exists? Kind of pointless making medicine for something nonexistant, eh?
squidavenger 3 months ago
@squidavenger I didn't cover that because I don't know much about medicine, so it's better not to talk about something I have no knowledge about. Some it can probably be explained by habits that some groups may tend to have, cultural perhaps, perhaps not. Some of it may also be more associated with geography.
Inari1987 3 months ago
@Inari1987 Neither do i, yet if a medicine is specific for blacks or as they write it "african-americans" due to their unique needs due to their racial genetic makeup, and well, that's a pretty strong indication for race. You just can't explain away a fact, i don't even see the point in you trying to fight something inevitably existing. By all means, keep your ultra-egalitarian views if you like, but im calling it quits aslong as you can't admit simply facts. Thanks for the discussion
squidavenger 3 months ago
@squidavenger Just sent a link that answers you. Cheers.
Inari1987 3 months ago
@squidavenger
Wait "if a medicine is specific for blacks". You will not find one, simply cause there is none.
You can't use something that doesn't exists in order to win an argument.
And if there is a race specific medicine please tell me about it, so I can see where you get your bullshit from.
Hasmond 3 months ago
@Hasmond If you'd actually read my previous comments you'd find ive already written down the medicine's name. The name of it is BiDil, it has a website with the very same name with information. So there's my "bullshit", so get your facts straight and learn some manners, asshole.
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger This article covers whether or not race exists and addresses the claim that Bidil is a racial drug:
What We Know and What We Don’t Know: Human Genetic Variation and the Social Construction of Race
By Joseph L. Graves, Jr.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay I quote from the article, "This of course means, if all other factors were equal, that more “whites” should have less elastic arterioles than “blacks.” If so, BiDil should help whites more than blacks". They are admitting that whites would then benefit most from this medicine if one equalizes enviromental factors. Hm, a pretty sound argument For racial differences, ain't it?
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger No because it's still not a racial drug. All it means is that when environmental factors are controlled Whites are statistically more likely to be helped by the drug. Atleast some Whites. For race-based medicine to be valid you would need to establish that there are significant evolutionary differences that determine some essential genetic traits of a population. In humans there is more genetic variation within continental populations than between them.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay So you deny it being a racial drug, yet you say that whites (a race) would generally benefit more from it than blacks (another race), and this not being due to enviroment since its being controlled? That deppends on which groups one is comparing, all populations in Africa can't for example be regarded as of one race, north Africans have alot more in common with Europeans for example. And so you admit that there are these populations then, also called races..
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger It depends on which populations are being sampled. Not all Europeans are the same. White and Black are social designations based on skin color generalized for populations that are culturally and genetically diverse. North Africans do not have more in common with Europeans either from a cultural or biological perspective. There are more lighter-skinned North Africans but Supra-Saharan Africans like Egyptians and Libyans are linked to Sub-Saharans via the Pn2 clade.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@squidavenger It depends on which populations are being sampled. Not all Europeans are the same. White and Black are social designations based on skin color generalized for populations that are culturally and genetically diverse. North Africans do not have more in common with Europeans either from a cultural or biological perspective. There are more lighter-skinned North Africans but Supra-Saharan Africans like Egyptians and Libyans are linked to Sub-Saharans via the Pn2 clade.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@squidavenger It depends on which populations are being sampled. Not all Europeans are the same. White and Black are social designations based on skin color generalized for populations that are culturally and genetically diverse. North Africans do not have more in common with Europeans either from a cultural or biological perspective. There are more lighter-skinned North Africans but Supra-Saharan Africans like Egyptians and Libyans are linked to Sub-Saharans via the Pn2 clade.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay If US blacks in large differ in enviroments which preexpose them to heart failure (due to culture or whatnot) is not very relevant when they themselves admit that whites would be benifited most by this drug and in turn pointing to genetic differences. Article ends with aknowledgement of genetic variation in regions and "The overall amount of measured human genetic variation, however, is very small", and this "very small" is likely a very subjective interpretation.
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger It's not a subjective interpretation it's based on empirical genetic research. No credible scientist denies that there is genetic variation. When it comes to whether biological races exist it must be understood that there are biological definitions of race that can scientifically investigated and there are social definitions of race which vary from region to region and culture to culture. I can send you a link by that author who discusses this in detail.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay In that sentence he does not describe how much this variation is nor how much "very small" is defined as, this makes it a subjective statement as he does not provide us with anything else than his own conclusion without allowing an objective overview of his train of thought. If i would say the statue of liberty is tiny to someone who's never seen it, should he take my word for it or actually see it for himself and make an objective judgement?
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger Basically you're saying you want more info to verify for yourself what he is talking about. If that is the case I can send you a full length article where he discusses it in detail. If you request it I will send a link via PM.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay Id preffer it if you yourself pointed out the evidence for such a statement, or atleast reffere me to where exactly this can be found. Rather that you back up your own standpoint then for me needing to drudge through an entire article.
squidavenger 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay And yes, mixing definitions can be quite troublesome, yet, denying (biological)race due to some cultural ambiguious definitions regarding race will not help enlighten anyone and will only provide more confusion.
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger There is a semantic dispute over the proper definition of race which leads to confusion as it is. Scientists have attempted to settle this dispute and come to a reliable and testable definition. Many have argued that there are no biological races and they draw this conclusions based on a scientifically defined definition of race. This is also discussed in the article I am recommending that you read.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay Such a reliable definition i would gladly like to hear, if you'd be willing to clarify which it is? I myself have always used the standard subspecies/race definition, which can be found at thefreedictionary website.
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger Yes, Race = Subspecies. Subspecies definitions: ""Subspecies are groups of actually or potentially interbreeding populations phylogenetically distinguishable from, but reproductively compatible with, other such groups. Importantly the evidence for phylogenetic distinction must normally come from the concordant distributions of multiple, independent, genetically based traits." (Avis and Ball 1990)
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay And a variation of 15% between groups is strictly not sufficient for a subspecies classification, then? Comparing populations can variate alot deppending on which of these are compared, which populations are being compared may i ask, and if you will, could you link me and article of which you quote this from? And furthermore, measuring alot of individuals within a group is bound to give higher variation, especially if compared to clustered population groups.
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger The within group variation of genetic polymorphisms for continental human populations is greater than 85% leaving only about 15% of total genetic variation between populations. This means that in terms of genetic similarity two people of different continental ancestry can be more genetically similar to each other than people of the same continental ancestry meaning there are no genetic boundaries that distinguish these populations phylogenetically.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay Can be more genetically similar, But is that chance very high? A high polymorphic variation within a group surely doesn't entail overwhelmingly polymorphic similarity between two seperate groups? As for your feature video, it sure seems neutral stating something as "illusionary" already in its title..
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger The major genetic differentiation within the human species being within continental populations indicates that there are no breeding populations with distinct genetic markers that distinguish those populations from others (i.e. no phylogenetic distinctions). The feature video is an educational video which intends to provide information about misconceptions and myths concerning race. The no biological races position is mainstream science.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay Most races are geographically bound, and most individuals within a race interbreed with their own kin, do they not? No distinct genetic markers, then what was the 15% disparity between the populations about? When precisely is the race category valid, at 20%? Also, could you reffer me to that in-out group genetic variation source? Well, drinking is pretty mainstream to, but im not subscribing for conformity.
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger Google this article:
Conceptualizing Human Variation
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay So the arguments against race is that the genetics in the racial group group is to diverse? Rainbows which have plenty of diverse colours, is it then no longer a rainbow, due to its high "in group" diversity? To me it seems they're attacking the concept of race then anything else. Their little euphemism 'populations' seems even more ambigious then that of 'race', certainly one can reffer to alot of things as populations.
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger You complained that the video was not neutral but they are promoting a consensus position on the topic.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay Consensus in the spirit of the Conceptualizing human variation article? Where they'll denounce race as valid biologic taxonomy, yet use the even more vague word "population"?
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger That paper does support the consensus, yes. How is population a vague word? It simply means a group of people residing in a given area. People can be grouped many different ways. Noone denies that there are populations with genetic similarity.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay The precise word of race which defines the attributes of a certain population and the subject at hand can be understood more precisely. It is an outright stupid dilutement of the subject and a intellectual downgrade, not to surprised if all this has an egalitarian agenda. You might not deny that, but race seems impossible for you to accept, even though it's there in a watered down "populations".
squidavenger 2 months ago
@squidavenger It's not impossible for me to accept. Infact I accepted it without question for most of my life and still had an Egalitarian mindset before I heard scientific arguments about what race means and why it doesn't accurately describe human genetic variation. Learning its origins and how the term itselfs is rooted in racial bigotry I reject it as a valid classification on scientific grounds. But my main interested is social equality not scientific classifications.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@EgalitarianJay It it is not, then why deny it? 'Populations' is just a silly euphemism, and the critera for race seems pretty valid for me so far, you not pointing out the precise scientific explanation of why there aren't races, either. As far as i know, the word race originated from something akin to today's 'ethnicity'. I woulden't be surprised if your egalitarianism requires the denial of races just to make the belief acceptable to oneself, either way, thanks for the debate.
squidavenger 2 months ago 5
@squidavenger The feature video for my channel illustrates this with genetic testing and what this means for the concept of biological races and human genetic diversity in general.
EgalitarianJay 2 months ago
@Hasmond The medicine is called BiDi.
ShwangShwing 2 months ago in playlist More videos from HeyRuka
What you have to realize is that the WHITE ANGLO-ELITES in charge of the countries of Greater Anglosphere have contrived to lead into our countries massive numbers of non-White immigrants in failed attempt to DESTROY the White indigenous people of our countries. BUT....by doing so they have only made these countries, and perforce, themselves less powerful because third world countries are always backward and powerless. Russia and the other White countries have beaten the anglo-elites
Formulaone21 3 months ago
We have actual evidence of the elites in charge of Greater Anglosphere post World War Two. We have it on very good authority these vile anti-White elites formulated an outradeous explicit plan to force-assimilate White people out of existence. Understand...if you lead into a country racially dissimilar people to blend the receiving race out of existence, you are committing a program of genocide by force-assimilation.
If you try to alter another race genetically....GENOCIDE!!!
Formulaone21 3 months ago
It is only in White countries that this anti-racism is being perpetrated and forced upon the people...White people and our children. In other words, we are alleging that the WHITE ANGLO-ELITES AND THEIR ANTI-RACIST COLLABORATORS have systematically targeted by intentional programs of massive non-White immigration, forced integration, and racial assimilation into the non-White immigrant peoples. This is genocide...White Genocide and it needs to be stopped and punished
Anti-racist == Anti-White
Formulaone21 3 months ago
The Genocide is characterized by the second oldest and probably most successful method known to humankind: force-assimilate a given population by leading massive numbers of racially dissimilar people into their country(s); then force-integrate these populations; then spend massive amounts of funds psycho-socially re-engineering trying to get the original population feel compelled to racially assimilate with the incoming population.That is genocide and has been forced on White people
Formulaone21 3 months ago
Moreover, White countries belong to the indigenous White peoples of those countries, we have absolutely no obligation to give anyone outside of our countries any kind of non-discriminatory acknowledgement whatsoever. Again, because you are a flaming anti-White, you still don't understand that our countries are for our people, just as Asia is for the Asians, Africa for the Africans. We deserve preferential treatment in our own homelands.
Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White!!
Formulaone21 3 months ago
And White people in White countries are literally being forced to accept, obviously against their will the demand that they integrate and intermarry with the non-White immigrants that have been led into our countries and ONLY into our countries.Don't believe me??
You will be condemned for racism if you oppose intermarriage. In most White country you can go to jail for racism.
The government protects the right to be anti-white but tries to do away with the right to be pro-white.
Formulaone21 3 months ago
When your people and their children have been the target of trillions of dollars of psychosocial re-engineering to make them hate and disown their own race, such as White people from birth have.
When ONLY your continent has its borders broken down so that massive numbers of non-Whites can be led into your country, such as happened to ONLY White countries,
You begin to feel as if you are being systematically targeted
DIVERSITY IS A CODEWORD FOR THE PROGRAM OF WHITE GENOCIDE!
Formulaone21 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DIVERSITY AND MULTICULTURALISM ARE CODEWORDS FOR THE PROGRAM OF WHITE GENOCIDE THAT THE ANTI-RACISTS AND THEIR ANTI-WHITE ANGLO-ELITE MASTERS HAVE IMPOSED UPON THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF EUROPE!!!
ANTI-RACIST IS A CODEWORD FOR ANTI-WHITE
YOU SAY YOU ARE ANTI-RACIST, WHAT YOU REALLY ARE IS ANTI-WHITE!!!
CRAZY ANTI-WHITES!!!
Formulaone21 3 months ago
Is this not just a distraction from a true goal of Social Darwinism?
23lFrench 3 months ago
Tell me is this, or is this not, a distraction from a true goal of social darwinism? you do of course realize that this racial segregation thing will NEVER happen. Never. Granted, you aren't the brightest, but I find it hard to believe even you can't see that this is an impossibility. The sick are much more easily portrayed as expendable. they are not beneficial to the economy and to people like you that's all that really matters isn't it?
mojosideburns 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's technically true. You are racist.
Elementer117 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FnPgt In other words I have finally caught one of you filthy anti-Whites with your own words...AGAIN. Essentially, you are here publicly acknowleging, justifying, and advocating for the system of White Genocide-by-Assimilation that I and other White Dissidents have been fighting against. You are in essence admitting that you are nothing more than a genocidal freak against White children, EVEN IF YOU ARE A WHITE PERSON.
ANTI-RACIST IS JUST A CODEWORD FOR ANTI-WHITE HATRED.
Formulaone21 3 months ago
I have no faith in racism. It is evolution lie.
EvolutionNeverHappen 3 months ago
@EvolutionNeverHappen i gots me a video in my faves of a fish dat say "allah" main... even da fishes no more bout da worl den yo EvolutionNeverHappen ass... take dat main!
DollabiIIz2 3 months ago
Asia for the Asians. Africa for the Africans. White countries for everybody. It isn't an African problem. Nobody is flooding Africa with non-Africans and giving them affirmative action, special rights and privileges and free health care. Only white countries are doing this. Only white leaders are supporting this. Only white children are suffering from it. It is genocide.
Formulaone21 3 months ago 4
@Formulaone21 South Africa apartheid.. white minority govt control over majoring black population, given special rights and privileged.. also.. its not like people of other backgrounds not allowed in Asian countries, look at the UAE huge foreign population.
midgetman433 2 months ago
The Japanese have genocided the indigenous Ainu population of the 'Japanese' Islands. The Ainu were there thousands of years before the Asians in the form of the Japanese arrived and started displacing, and assimilating them out of existence. But you anti-Whites don't demand that they allow into their country non-Asian immigrants to make a blended humanity in Japan and ONLY Japan. But this is being perpetrated upon White countries and ONLY White countries. YOU WANT WHITE GENOCIDE
Formulaone21 3 months ago
The Zulus in Africa conquered and nearly wiped out the Hottentots.
But nobody says the Africans need to accept millions of non-Black people for this.
Do we hear governments, the mass media, and academia and their anti-racist lackeys calling for Africa to bring in millions of non-African people and assimilate with them because they did this?
People say this about ALL White countries and ONLY White countries
It's White genocide.
Formulaone21 3 months ago
@Formulaone21 god, who would want to, a cursory review of richard lynn's global IQ charts is MORE than enough for me... i don't need to know they have much worse sexual disease rates, much higher crime rates, etc...
i have fantasies of battles in history i would like to change, and i do it racially based on the IQ of both sides, the sharpest contrast of any one major battle i can think of was in the Anglo-Zulu War:
The Battle of Isandlwana
just a few hundred AK-47s, if even, were needed...
glorp896 3 months ago
Diversity is a codeword for white genocide.
Do we hear governments, the mass media, and academia calling for Japan to bring in millions of non-Japanese people and assimilate with them because they're "not diverse enough"?
Why are they doing this in ALL and ONLY White countries?
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Formulaone21 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No one says a neighborhood that is 100% black needs more diversity.
No one says a neighborhood that is 100% asian needs more diversity.
No one says a neighborhood that is 100% oriental needs more diversity.
They are already 100% diverse.
All white neighborhoods and only white neighborhoods always need to be more diverse. White neighborhoods only stop needing to be more diverse when there are no white people left in them.
.
Formulaone21 3 months ago
If ALL and ONLY Black countries in 1965 were forced by their treasonous eltes to open their borders and let hundreds of millions of non-Blacks into their countries, and then 90 years later, Blacks are expected to be minorities in the countries that let non-Blacks in; that's not done by accident. It's obviously a plan to wipe out the Black race. AKA genocide.
ANTI-RACIST IS JUST A CODEWORD FOR ANTI-WHITE
.
Formulaone21 3 months ago
People say there is a RACE problem. People say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY and ONLY into white countries.
People say the only solution to the RACE problem is if EVERY and ONLY white countries “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against White people, Anti-Whites agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
ANTI-RACIST IS CODE FOR ANTI-WHITE!!!
.
Formulaone21 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We have massive immigration into all white countries, and it is only being forced on white countries. We have forced integration of all these non-whites. Anti-whites call themselves anti-racists and promote intermarriage and condemn people who oppose intermarriage. And then they talk about a brown future in formerly white countries.
YOU ANTI-WHITES are part of this program of genocide against my race, the white race.
We must never protect White people in their view. They are anti-white.
Formulaone21 3 months ago
I don't get it, how'd you piss off so many people, Ruka? Most of what you're saying is common sense.
Amy31415 3 months ago
Watching this video makes me feel like im watching a fucking government sex tape
RDmLabel 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well, if the shoe fits...
ZPM7 3 months ago
It is only in White countries that this anti-racism is being perpetrated and forced upon the people...White people and our children. In other words, we are alleging that the WHITE ANGLO-ELITES AND THEIR ANTI-RACIST COLLABORATORS have systematically targeted by intentional programs of massive non-White immigration, forced integration, and racial assimilation into the non-White immigrant peoples. This is genocide...White Genocide and it needs to be stopped and punished!
Formulaone21 3 months ago
@Formulaone21 the white anglo elites wow what a title!
I was thinking are only the anglo whites? Or are they the elites among the whites?
what about the Nordic (Sweden finland Norway)
french
Germans
Polish
Italians
215alessio 3 months ago
The political decision to open the floodgates to non-White immigration (w/ out a popular vote) WAS deliberate. The political decision to force integrate White neighborhoods was deliberate. The political decision to put out PSAs that encourage interracial coupling was deliberate.
Don’t kid yourself. It doesn’t have to be immediate killing to be genocide under the law. It only need be INTENT that there be fewer Whites coupled with an ACT
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
Formulaone21 3 months ago
@Formulaone21 Well they still had the option of voting for parties which would have halted immigration, been a few over the years. But they didn't, they voted for the parties which they KNEW would allow immigrants in, so yes, the people gave their consent. Democracy at work mate. In the future they may vote for a party which will kick 'em all out again, but it ain't likely.
Beelzeboogie 3 months ago
@Beelzeboogie First of all, the law which instituted massive non-White immigration was not assented to by the indigenous people at large. As usual, it was brought in under stealth and political chacanery. The sponsors of the law are on record admitting that they knew that the indigenous Brits would not allow it if it was put to any kind of vote. Second, you have to understand the massive psychological conditioning that has been perpetrated upon White children to stop them from resisting this.
Formulaone21 3 months ago
@Beelzeboogie Moreover, you are missing a very important point here. Whether our people are allowed to vote on this measure is irrelevant to the actual crime that has been committed. The fact is that the WHITE anglo-elites are on record as articulating a plan to bring in massive numbers of non-White immigrants within the very democratic mechanisms that you have alluded to and, thus, racially assimilate White people out of existence forever. Their objective was and still is GENOCIDAL! TRIBUNAL!!!
Formulaone21 3 months ago
@Formulaone21 But it's not on record is it! You said it yourself that it wasn't a matter of public record! Secret files and all that! You've seen these documents yourself I presume?
Beelzeboogie 3 months ago
@Beelzeboogie The proof is on record. We have the goods on these vile creatures. Our side will bring this proof to the public when we finally have a system of tribunals to deal legally with these characters.
ANTI-RACIST IS JUST A CODEWORD FOR ANTI-WHITE
MULTICULTURALISM AND DIVERSITY ARE JUST CODEWORDS FOR THE SYSTEM OF WHITE GENOCIDE-BY-ASSIMILATION THAT HAS BEEN FORCED UPON WHITE PEOPLE AND OUR CHILDREN.
Formulaone21 3 months ago
@Beelzeboogie Aah, I have finally publicly 'outed' you in a sense. You have finally implicitly admitted that there is indeed a program to bring in massive amounts of non-Whites into Britain,and other White countries, and ONLY White countries. You've implicitly agreed with my orginal assertion that there is indeed a measure that has been implemented by the anglo-elites to lead into that country non-White peoples in an attempt to make the indigenous Whites of Britain a racial minority there
Formulaone21 3 months ago
@Formulaone21 Oh for gods sake It was a hypothetical situation. I stated that even IF we (meaning tha anglo-elites which I assume you think I am a part of) planned to literally force black folks to move into the country and IF we brainwashed everyone to fuck them, theirs still no guilty party. It'd be like blaming the person who left the knife lying around in the kitchen when somebody stabs themselves with it.
Beelzeboogie 3 months ago
@Beelzeboogie Indeed, there is a guilty party, that being those who financed, articulated, financed, and orchistrated this attempted genocide. What you and your other anti-racist(read anti-White) cohorts don't understand is that you cannot within the scope of International law systematically target a specific population for any kind of genetic alteration with the intent to destroy that population. That is what has been attempted by these very WHITE anglo-elites.
ANTI-RACIST == ANTI-WHITE!!!
Formulaone21 3 months ago
@Formulaone21 Let's go back to these anglo-elites for a second. Since you claim it's happening in ALL white countries these guys must be in control of EVERY white country. Since you claim it's happening ONLY white countries, that implies that they are also in control of all black countries and all Asian countries since they COULD do it in these countries but choose not to,
So if i'm reading this right, there is a group that controls all government, all media and all technology in world. Right?
Beelzeboogie 3 months ago