Edwards is the only candidate not takina a dime from lobbyists or PACs. He is the only candidate who opposes expanding NAFTA, which sent so many U.S. jobs to other countries.
check out this video on utube and let the bush administration and america know how you really feel.Carefull the comment section is rigged against bush bashers.
Why did they present Edwards as a "trial lawyer" rather than a former senator? We know that the right has been most successful in demonizing that career so it just seems as if they're trying to associate Edwards with negative right-wing myths.
They present him as a "trial lawyer" rather than a former senator because his experience as a trial lawyer is important to his message of being the right person to fight for change. That's one reason he will win Iowa.
If You're Thinking About Voting For John Edwards...
...First ask yourself these questions.
Did you know that John Edwards is also a member of the secretive Bilderberg group and he does not agree with Obama that we should have transparency of government?
Is it right for John Edwards to vow not to take public financing and then to conveniently change his tune and force the democratic party to carry his burden? Added to that did you know that he voted against public financed elections?
If Obama is your man, then go to his vids and talk him up. Why are you cutting and pasting the same negative comment in all of Edwards' videos? How would you like it if someone found an unpopular vote Barack made, and a poor decision he made and pasted it all over his vids? Edwards knows he has made mistakes, he even says when he's wrong. You can find this type of stuff on any candidate. Is this all you got?
You post some negative ridiculous rant on every JE video. I hope that Mr. "Hope and Compromise" Obama works out for you. Change has never been brought about in any nation without someone fighting for it. Transparency In Govmt.? Obama won't even let you post a comment of disagreement, let alone the crap you post.
Thank you very much for your honest words. I believe in the core decency in you. That is why you will come to realise that my comments are far from negative rants but meaningful questions which spur us to uncover the facts and truth about Mr. Edwards. Thank you very much for responding. I will pray for your happiness and good health, from the bottom of my health.
Thank you very much. My comments are in no way negative rants, they are legitimate questions, which will help uncover more and more facts. I would like to ask Mr. Edwards these questions myself if I had the chance to.
Edwards is the only candidate not takina a dime from lobbyists or PACs. He is the only candidate who opposes expanding NAFTA, which sent so many U.S. jobs to other countries.
earthlvr 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out this video on utube and let the bush administration and america know how you really feel.Carefull the comment section is rigged against bush bashers.
watch?v=BqLvBUSJucg
audacityone 4 years ago
so what?
semiliteratedgod 4 years ago
Thanks for backing me up, erkekler!
You too, bpl72!
johnnyk67 4 years ago
Why did they present Edwards as a "trial lawyer" rather than a former senator? We know that the right has been most successful in demonizing that career so it just seems as if they're trying to associate Edwards with negative right-wing myths.
God, I hope Edwards win Iowa. C'mon!
Jackstowne 4 years ago
They did it so they could draw a relationship to the "closing arguments" theme. It's not a conspiracy.. just good writing.
piecewise 4 years ago
They present him as a "trial lawyer" rather than a former senator because his experience as a trial lawyer is important to his message of being the right person to fight for change. That's one reason he will win Iowa.
bpl72 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If You're Thinking About Voting For John Edwards...
...First ask yourself these questions.
Did you know that John Edwards is also a member of the secretive Bilderberg group and he does not agree with Obama that we should have transparency of government?
Is it right for John Edwards to vow not to take public financing and then to conveniently change his tune and force the democratic party to carry his burden? Added to that did you know that he voted against public financed elections?
paigia 4 years ago
What the fuck are you doing, Paigia?
If Obama is your man, then go to his vids and talk him up. Why are you cutting and pasting the same negative comment in all of Edwards' videos? How would you like it if someone found an unpopular vote Barack made, and a poor decision he made and pasted it all over his vids? Edwards knows he has made mistakes, he even says when he's wrong. You can find this type of stuff on any candidate. Is this all you got?
johnnyk67 4 years ago 4
You post some negative ridiculous rant on every JE video. I hope that Mr. "Hope and Compromise" Obama works out for you. Change has never been brought about in any nation without someone fighting for it. Transparency In Govmt.? Obama won't even let you post a comment of disagreement, let alone the crap you post.
bpl72 4 years ago
Good point, bpl72.
johnnyk67 4 years ago
Thank you very much for your honest words. I believe in the core decency in you. That is why you will come to realise that my comments are far from negative rants but meaningful questions which spur us to uncover the facts and truth about Mr. Edwards. Thank you very much for responding. I will pray for your happiness and good health, from the bottom of my health.
paigia 4 years ago
Thank you very much. My comments are in no way negative rants, they are legitimate questions, which will help uncover more and more facts. I would like to ask Mr. Edwards these questions myself if I had the chance to.
paigia 4 years ago
I prefer the politics of Kucinich over all of them.
voyzovrezon 4 years ago
there's no such candidate, unfortunately (<2%) support Edwards!
semiliteratedgod 4 years ago