I would be more impressed if the target was manoeuvring hard and didn't take ten seconds to burn a hole in a glass fibre and foam target and worked through cloud or the laser wasn't the size of a bus and weigh several tons .When they have worked that lot out I'll have one !
Some guerillas in Latin America wrap themselves in aluminium foil and pull wet clothes over the foil. The aluminmiumfoil suppresses the microwave radiation emitted from the body and the wet clothes the heat radiation. Somewhere on my homepage there is a picture of a microwave camera.
My Brother Markus Bott had been tortured during five and a half years because of our homepage and book. He was assassinated on 11.7.09 by the German BND which is the renamed GESTAPO.
Lasers = The speed of light. All they need is simple tracking software (which already exists) to keep this beam on target. They don't even have to give it a lead because .... well, the beam shoots at the speed of light.
@frostbite889 and I do hope the resistance have means to this technology and shoot lots of US drones down. I cheers for every single casualty the US and NATO TERRORISTS suffer!
@frostbite889 the resistance? conspiracy theorist ? open your eyes, nearly the whole world is the resistance against the US...... fuck off with your conspiracy theory labels.... you will sit comfortably while all of what little liberties remain are shed from your already naked body.
That wasn't the Navy shooting a laser at a drone. It was my 700 MegaWatt, time-warping FuckYou Laser shooting the lead UFO of an incoming extraterrestrial invasion.
To all you people talking about mirrors. Mirrors are usually frequency-specific, one that reflects visible light will not necessarily reflect UV or infrared wavelengths, making them vulnerable to weapons that can easily change their beam wavelength. Also no mirror you can use as armor is able to deflect a beam 100%, and the mirror surface will absorbe a lot of energy (just point a laser pen at the mirror and se the dot on it. ) burning a hole in no time.
@IncendiaryFlux Well, you would probably not be able to see laser weapon beams in atmosphere either as the light most likely used is outside our eyes color ability.
what the fuck that was not a NUKE people, they wouldn't use NUKES in a fucking testing, didn't you see that was a DRONE, stop saying its a fucking NUKE
Modern nukes don't fly straight, don't fly by one- they separate into multiple warheads with broken complicated trajectories in case of danger, and they do not fly this SLOW..
@volodyaltd this was not a nuke, didn't you see the name of the video, it said 'laser weapon shoots down DRONE in test' not 'laser weapon shoots down NUKE in test'
Check out my homepage for further experiments using laser. There are several easy to do examples to split the beam, modulate on of the two and then recombine them to produce low frequency beats. These beats should be able to induce currents into the body to transmit sound or steer muscles if used with high power lasers. You dont even need a laser, this can be done with ordinary light and heat radiation as well. The double slit experiment mostly is done with an ordinary light source.
@TheGroovemaker1 Your fuckin' stupid.. A UFO doesn't mean a flying saucer.. A UFO is an Unidentified Flying Object not necessarily a fuckin' alien spacecraft.. However, UFO's do exist.. Whether they're reverse engineered at Area 51 (Which is pretty likely with the known planes that have been announced coming from there as early as the 60's) or are actually alien made.. They exist.. You're just dumb if you think there's not different life forms then what's on Earth.
@jpmac098 I never said it couldn't be.. It was man however, the same technology still stays hidden on the most sophisticated radars today.. So it's obviously very high tech, and it's still the same tech from the 60s. So yes, it could be.. However, it'd take a lot longer then it took.. We may not have even had it today if it weren't for Area51.
this is very early testing the "target" is making no evasive manuvers possably just a plane that had malfunctions and caught on fire... there is a large market in the army that just aquired top tecnology unmaned arial targets
@michaelandolga you going to hold a jar of water in front of it. Do it then have a friend post the video on here i would definately watch it. i think your comment about the GED is because thats your highest level of Education.
Now if we can just make sure that all the enemy targets are real small, easy to destroy, flying at a convenient level, and traveling really slowly, then this will work perfectly!
@superbarnie They would have too get here first, accross the Pacific ocean. They won't be able to do that, we would blow up all of their ships before they even reach Hawaii!
metal is a lot easier to melt than a mirror. mainly because it reflects. for a very powerful laser to cut a mirror it would have to point at it self so that it can send the beam back and forth till it get to the melting point of the mirror material. if the mirror is at a angle it would throw it off
@xxTheMiddleGroundxx Okay ~ you stand there and hold the mirror while the US Navy fires a laser beam at you. Be sure to get in on video so we can all laugh as you leap into the water screaming "omg omg i'm on fire i'm on fire".
@ouroboris lol thats what i've been saying these people have no brain power to figure it out i think you just have to let them speak because it just goes to show the lack of education.. but technically you could defect it but the mirror required would have to extreamly heavy and reflective and costly most of our enemies would not possess that kind of tech anyway
@dilan4me No, they wouldn't be retarded enough to shoot something down of their own that costs so much money to make. It's just a normal drone. btw, stealth planes cost milions of dollars to make and there have only been a few made in the entire world.
@gamekiiid As of this video release perhaps, but the new systems now (4-2011) can handle that task because of the multiple lasers that are mounted on the ship.
@gamekiiid Yes, it truly is, and it is also bad for anyone else that would become a target of these "killer lasers"!! I was wondering how long it would be before they actually put one of the new super high powered lasers into service. And now it is a reality.
They should have some of those for civilians to take out the chemtrail tankers that act like they have imunity to spray unknown aerosols, where can I buy one? Im sick of the geoengineering or whatever they are doing to lace the skys here in Los Angeles almost daily. I promise I wont use it on any planes that arnt spewing chemtrails.
You're paying millions so that you can sleep soundly at night, knowing that there's someone protecting you. Pull your head out of your ass, "joeytrimble".
@PsuPepperoni Actually, your new bullshit would work well if those Migs fly at hight altitudes where there won't be any obstacles. Low altitudes mean mountains and low plane visibility - you'd see its thin side rather than the belly whose area is larger and easier to target.
I don't think it's easy to dodge the laser, given that the targeting system is reactive and agile, which seems to be the case, so flying in non-straight lines won't be a problem.
@theostor222 I downloaded the bit torrent of this clip( the best i could find) and then watched it clip-by-clip. No Splash... Plus the lighting on the water dramatically changes.
Oh, I get it !!! This " Bad-Ass " laser, will replace the Navy's CIWS, on ships, and through in a couple of " Rail Guns " and LCS-1 & 2. Man you won't even see this coming.
This is very sad pushing war, pushing weapons, pushing destruction, pushing death and making it OK, and losing our rights for it. This New World Order System.
DF-21 is useless, the Chinese would never be stupid enough to launch a ballistic missile in times of war. Ballistic missile warrants a direct nuclear retaliation.
@cr9527 Then why would they build it in the first place? Obviously it probably won't be used until an all out war, but it is still direct threat to the Pacific fleet.
@cr9527 No, not entirely desperate. True there is no current evidence that it is working, but that's not an elligable chance that we should take. Plus the DF 21D is the first ASMB to be developed; it may not be used, but it definately promotes China's capabilty to operate U.S. naval intervention in the Taiwan Strait.
@cr9527 I'm not too sure aboout that... True the U.S. may not be entirely defenseless, but the DF 21D moves at mark 10, giving U.S. carriers less than 10mins to react. That is if it can pick it up from 900miles away.
It's weapon capabilities haven't been tested yet so there's no certainty, however, it was created to be a game changer against the super carriers.
First off, it's a large medium range ballistic missile. US has more than enough capability to monitor the entire world for these launches. From satellite assets to UAV, and even now the F-35 can track missile launches.
Secondly, the ONLY way for DF-21D to work is if China attacks the US navy without first declaring war
As soon as war breaks out, you can count on a systematic destruction of majority of launchers for ballistic missiles. There are so many effective counters for it.
@cr9527 It's still considered a game changer. Yes, there may be ways to counter it through manoevours or other methods, but the primary anti-ballistic capabilities such as the AEGIS BMD has NO confirmation that it can protect against a DF-21D.
So far the only way to completely avoid it is to stay out of range. And that's exactly what we have done with the USS. Washington docking in the Sea of Japan during the training exercise with the ROK.
Let's look at the worst case scenario, assuming PLAN can find the carrier, assuming DF-21D can find the target, assuming DF-21D can maneuver to a moving target, assuming SM-3 doesn't intercept during midcourse, assuming SM-2 doesn't intercept during terminal, Assuming RAM does nothing, congrats, DF-21D has just punched a small hole into the carrier's top few decks damaging a few aircraft and crew.
A few days of repair, and she'll be back into operation.
Then you can look at what is available to counter it.
More persistent air dominance along the coasts, drones, AEGIS, smart maneuvering, decoys, EW, I can go on.
The decision to take the fleet exercise east of Korea is a political, not a military one.
DF-21D, like all coastal defenses, will only work amongst other things, if you out range your target. This limitation forces you to place the batteries in very obvious and predictable locations.
@cr9527 Okay, so there are many ways to counter this laser yes, but it is the FIRST one, meaning they finally got the basics down. And just like all other things, from that the US can expand from it, make it better. This just proves that lasers can be done, and they have a basic understanding of it now, so it is very much so a very big a game changer in that we now have a whole new unexplored technology which can be used for weaponry and may in the future have other affects to it.
@cr9527 "DF-21D, like all coastal defenses, will only work amongst other things, if you out range your target. This limitation forces you to place the batteries in very obvious and predictable locations."
They are not fixed to batteries, but are mobile (Yes can be moved whenever they want to). Therefore not predictable. To believe that China is a one trick pony when it comes to countering the carrier group is absurd. So yes, with it in China's arsenal now, it is very much a game changer.
They are mobile to the extent of mobile long/medium range SAM launchers, which always performed disastrously worse in face against an organized force.
@cr9527 Since when did an organized force engage a country such as China? It will come in handy no doubt if they were China's mobile SAMs. Considering that China isn't an unorganized force in itself.
Kosovo, the serbs had the equivalent to the PLA back then, had vast arrays of strategic and tactical SAM launchers, but were rendered entirely useless.
I never said the PLA was disorganized, I stated that mobile strategic ballistic(medium-long range) missile launchers and Mobile strategic SAMs do not perform well against an organized force. This is why even the States do not use them.
They might be "Mobile", but are too few, and too slow to survive.
@eddieisfiction not yet but that time is close, if an massive war starts now there still will be dogfights and sams , and hi tech techiks like tanks in end of ww1
@grumman84 more like intercontinental missles then tanks. Tanks would be more of already occupying a won territory, however high speed transports are alot better nowadays, since you can through a 50 cal or a mark 19 on those just fine.
@altoids79762 This isnt the same type of laser as in a laser pointer, these lasers melt through 1 inch steel targets in a second, your mirror would be a puddle of glass on the floor, or at least left of it.
@altoids79762 Dude these things shoot missiles down in seconds from hundreds of miles away. Any way you can think to make a mirror stronger still wont be enough.
I always thought it would be cool to aim the turret at the ground ad just go to work, making a nice straight line of destruction on the ground below.
@altoids79762 "pretty evil weapon"(quoted from altoids79762). I disagree with your use of the word evil in describing an inanimate object. The person behind the weapon may be evil, but not the weapon itself, as inanimate objects have no emotional characteristics. I would recommend replacing the word evil with the word Sinister or perhaps Scary.
@altoids79762 I believe you misunderstood me. I did not say you were wrong to be scared. I stated you were trying to get your point across in the wrong way.
@JackRABBITslim27 I dont believe that to be the case. As with most weapon systems in the USA they are developed and flown years before they are made public. With all the stuff we have and use just think of how much more cool stuff is kept in the dark. Just look back at the A-bomb, B2 stealth bomber and the stealth fighter and the U2 spy plane, all used in service before being announced.
We have these on airplanes now too for shooting down incoming missiles. I have seen the picture but forgot the name ( please reinform me if you know) and its pretty bad ass. Its actually 3 lasers in 1, 1 for distance locking, 2 to read atmospheric distortions and the final is the actual weapon.
@thbs35 Thank you, yea Ive seen them flying around Writt-Patterson AFB in Dayton Ohio. Id like to get a closer look, but obviously that wont be happening.
This is a "comfortable" video. =p
itostrong923v 1 week ago
This video is a favorite on Philippines
buddyrich410 3 weeks ago
...resistance to the TERRORISM of North America F**K you abd good bye too!
sacopenapa 1 month ago
I would be more impressed if the target was manoeuvring hard and didn't take ten seconds to burn a hole in a glass fibre and foam target and worked through cloud or the laser wasn't the size of a bus and weigh several tons .When they have worked that lot out I'll have one !
oohaahbird 2 months ago
♫ Amerrrcaaa....fuck yeah ♫
nitroxide17 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some guerillas in Latin America wrap themselves in aluminium foil and pull wet clothes over the foil. The aluminmiumfoil suppresses the microwave radiation emitted from the body and the wet clothes the heat radiation. Somewhere on my homepage there is a picture of a microwave camera.
My Brother Markus Bott had been tortured during five and a half years because of our homepage and book. He was assassinated on 11.7.09 by the German BND which is the renamed GESTAPO.
wwwtotalitaerde 2 months ago
dear attackers please fly in a nice straight line so we can shoot you down ,thank you for your co-operation!!
oohaahbird 2 months ago
@oohaahbird
Lasers = The speed of light. All they need is simple tracking software (which already exists) to keep this beam on target. They don't even have to give it a lead because .... well, the beam shoots at the speed of light.
kez850 2 months ago
I hope the military is ready to pay me for destroying my RC plane.
Dillon1108 3 months ago
May the rsistance to the ilegal us invazions see this footage!
sacopenapa 3 months ago
@sacopenapa Well it might help if you knew how to use proper english and or spanish.
frostbite889 1 month ago
@frostbite889
If you only spoke my language... you probably speak english only. In any case, F**K the USA!
sacopenapa 1 month ago
@sacopenapa labhairt i mhac dúr tú ró-na hÉireann de asal
frostbite889 1 month ago
@frostbite889
Vai toma no olho do seu cu seu vidado sem vergonha!
sacopenapa 1 month ago
@frostbite889 and I do hope the resistance have means to this technology and shoot lots of US drones down. I cheers for every single casualty the US and NATO TERRORISTS suffer!
sacopenapa 1 month ago
@sacopenapa um what are you talking about what resistance? are you a conspericy theorist oh fuck i dont deal with wackos like you oodbye
frostbite889 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@frostbite889 the resistance? conspiracy theorist ? open your eyes, nearly the whole world is the resistance against the US...... fuck off with your conspiracy theory labels.... you will sit comfortably while all of what little liberties remain are shed from your already naked body.
cybermental 1 month ago
@sacopenapa Lol yeah "the resistance having means to this technology", false hope there pal.
cerastes6 2 weeks ago
That wasn't the Navy shooting a laser at a drone. It was my 700 MegaWatt, time-warping FuckYou Laser shooting the lead UFO of an incoming extraterrestrial invasion.
You can all thank me for saving the world.
GreatAmericanSXtoy 4 months ago
I only see a trail of smoke/fire... coming FROM that flying thing. Am I wrong ?
ExperiencedGhost 5 months ago
@ExperiencedGhost because you cant see light traveling to the drone
lan600000 5 months ago
@ExperiencedGhost Stop hoping for star wars -.-
cleverusername6 4 months ago
@ExperiencedGhost lololol if you turn on a lightbulb in a room, do you see the air light up, or just light reflecting off the walls?
lebensraummetal 4 months ago
@ExperiencedGhost That's all you would see. It's like a laser pointer, but much, much more powerful. You don't see the beam like in Star Trek.
GenaTrius 3 months ago
What was the target vehicle???? looked like a wing...... Was it a drone????
RuggedBrotha 5 months ago
@RuggedBrotha Nope. We shot down a fully manned 2 Billion dollar B2 Bomber. Ofcourse.
TumisHumis 5 months ago
To all you people talking about mirrors. Mirrors are usually frequency-specific, one that reflects visible light will not necessarily reflect UV or infrared wavelengths, making them vulnerable to weapons that can easily change their beam wavelength. Also no mirror you can use as armor is able to deflect a beam 100%, and the mirror surface will absorbe a lot of energy (just point a laser pen at the mirror and se the dot on it. ) burning a hole in no time.
Serpentbane666 6 months ago
@IncendiaryFlux Well, you would probably not be able to see laser weapon beams in atmosphere either as the light most likely used is outside our eyes color ability.
Serpentbane666 6 months ago
what the fuck that was not a NUKE people, they wouldn't use NUKES in a fucking testing, didn't you see that was a DRONE, stop saying its a fucking NUKE
cococlaudio123 6 months ago
@cococlaudio123 actually, america has used several hundred nukes in various tests. many of them on our own soil.
lebensraummetal 4 months ago
@lebensraummetal mostly all near Area 51 as well.
shadowhunter388 3 months ago
Modern nukes don't fly straight, don't fly by one- they separate into multiple warheads with broken complicated trajectories in case of danger, and they do not fly this SLOW..
volodyaltd 6 months ago
@volodyaltd this was not a nuke, didn't you see the name of the video, it said 'laser weapon shoots down DRONE in test' not 'laser weapon shoots down NUKE in test'
cococlaudio123 6 months ago
well looks like we do not have to worry about nukes hitting there target!
Just throw a laser and we will be saved ! Yippe!
187deepblue 6 months ago
@Gzxmodzz why are you getting so worked up XD that was just his opinon chill out
CookieIIITY 6 months ago
It just heats it up and melts everything such as wires aand the metalwings and stuff...not that techy...if u see things my way
DarkManagerful 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my homepage for further experiments using laser. There are several easy to do examples to split the beam, modulate on of the two and then recombine them to produce low frequency beats. These beats should be able to induce currents into the body to transmit sound or steer muscles if used with high power lasers. You dont even need a laser, this can be done with ordinary light and heat radiation as well. The double slit experiment mostly is done with an ordinary light source.
wwwtotalitaerde 6 months ago
Too bad UFO's don't exist:)
TheGroovemaker1 7 months ago
@TheGroovemaker1 Your fuckin' stupid.. A UFO doesn't mean a flying saucer.. A UFO is an Unidentified Flying Object not necessarily a fuckin' alien spacecraft.. However, UFO's do exist.. Whether they're reverse engineered at Area 51 (Which is pretty likely with the known planes that have been announced coming from there as early as the 60's) or are actually alien made.. They exist.. You're just dumb if you think there's not different life forms then what's on Earth.
GZxModzz 7 months ago
@GZxModzz Yes because stealth technology can't be man made...
jpmac098 6 months ago
@jpmac098 I never said it couldn't be.. It was man however, the same technology still stays hidden on the most sophisticated radars today.. So it's obviously very high tech, and it's still the same tech from the 60s. So yes, it could be.. However, it'd take a lot longer then it took.. We may not have even had it today if it weren't for Area51.
GZxModzz 6 months ago
@bluedevil1642 us already have satalites that capable of shoting ufo`s
carlogwapo1234 7 months ago
@carlogwapo1234 true
a7xmoy97 7 months ago
if russian and china got SAND U,S got Laser weapon and space satalite with high power laser!!!
carlogwapo1234 7 months ago
Wow, didn't know they had lasers in the days of Charlie Chaplin style films.....
MrCrispy616 7 months ago
they couldn't have choosen a cheaper drone sheeeesh!
bloodswetandgears 7 months ago
wow it flew under the wires in the foreground....that would make this craft approx 4 inches in diameter.
gstanz67 7 months ago
I like the laser weapons in star wars better, those make big booms!
FurlogTheGiant 8 months ago
Anyone knowtist how we never see there famous "laser weapon"?
PierreRMB 8 months ago
the cold war continues on while we are still sittin clueless in our matrix like world
analcorndog 8 months ago
hahahah this is wat came up when i searched russia today (russian news)
analcorndog 8 months ago
UAV
Betaplayer366 8 months ago
i didnt see anything... was it the big light from the start of the video?
SuperDrinkin 8 months ago
this is very early testing the "target" is making no evasive manuvers possably just a plane that had malfunctions and caught on fire... there is a large market in the army that just aquired top tecnology unmaned arial targets
LoganGoGetter 9 months ago
Aren't those russians always bragging about they're missile technology? well its fucking garbage now.
vegamarco4 9 months ago
next thing they are going to tell us is that they have sharks with fricken laser beams .. Yeah baby! Yeah!
sbeierly 9 months ago
i think it's already been a decade or more they have this. they are always 50 years ahead.
putademuerde2 9 months ago
That's a really big breakthrough for weaponry, I mean when else have we had actual lasers.
EZL80 9 months ago
I'mma powerzz upp mahh Layzorrzz ann getzyas!
haha... :)
Taino187 9 months ago
wow............
firecracker151 9 months ago
Great, lets get some of these everywhere so that when UFO visit us, we will shoot them down.
FrapMocha 9 months ago
the dislike are those who dont understand laser technology. and also dont have it.
TheMetallurgy101 9 months ago
I would rather watch Pia Toscano.
whh01 9 months ago
Use mirrors to deflect the beam...use water or another clear medium to distract the beam...
Thanks champs...why not get that GED first instead of posting on YouTube?
michaelandolga 9 months ago
@michaelandolga you going to hold a jar of water in front of it. Do it then have a friend post the video on here i would definately watch it. i think your comment about the GED is because thats your highest level of Education.
TheMetallurgy101 9 months ago
News Flash! : sudden surge on demand for mirrors in Somalia.
GalacticVacuum 9 months ago
Do you REALLY think that this wont work, and work WELL at some point? You're kidding your selves...really.
mblatch777 9 months ago
Now if we can just make sure that all the enemy targets are real small, easy to destroy, flying at a convenient level, and traveling really slowly, then this will work perfectly!
richardhg 9 months ago
@richardhg the majority of anti-ship missiles fit nearly all of those qualifications.
XzenXzaneXzix 9 months ago
@richardhg yea, because a pirate ship is so much faster bigger and have more structural integrity than a drone...
aweiss 9 months ago
Use water or some other clear medium to make the beam all screwy... problem solved.
kodman15323 9 months ago
@superbarnie They would have too get here first, accross the Pacific ocean. They won't be able to do that, we would blow up all of their ships before they even reach Hawaii!
TheStarvingSamurai 9 months ago
Is this laser capable of shooting down the so called new chinese anti carrier missile???
worldchampion1986 9 months ago
metal is a lot easier to melt than a mirror. mainly because it reflects. for a very powerful laser to cut a mirror it would have to point at it self so that it can send the beam back and forth till it get to the melting point of the mirror material. if the mirror is at a angle it would throw it off
SKEL45 9 months ago
@SKEL45 Or you can just change the wavelength of the beam so that it could not be reflected. Now you mirror is that much weaker than metal. TADA
ps92117 9 months ago
TAKE THAT, NORTH KOREA!
despairedpheonix 9 months ago
Do they realize that anyone with a mirror could defend against it?
xxTheMiddleGroundxx 9 months ago
@xxTheMiddleGroundxx It would cut right through a mirror, it would have to be a super mirror
FutureC17Pilot 9 months ago
@xxTheMiddleGroundxx Okay ~ you stand there and hold the mirror while the US Navy fires a laser beam at you. Be sure to get in on video so we can all laugh as you leap into the water screaming "omg omg i'm on fire i'm on fire".
ouroboris 9 months ago
@ouroboris lol thats what i've been saying these people have no brain power to figure it out i think you just have to let them speak because it just goes to show the lack of education.. but technically you could defect it but the mirror required would have to extreamly heavy and reflective and costly most of our enemies would not possess that kind of tech anyway
TheMetallurgy101 9 months ago
epic quality
hdfizz 9 months ago
Nice! Just wonder if i see this weapon size of shoulder missile launcher in my live time.That will be a good time talk about gun control.
digitalbaba1960 9 months ago
what kinda plane is that it looks like stealth...
dilan4me 10 months ago
@dilan4me No, they wouldn't be retarded enough to shoot something down of their own that costs so much money to make. It's just a normal drone. btw, stealth planes cost milions of dollars to make and there have only been a few made in the entire world.
spencer2468 10 months ago
this lazer can shoot down one or two or 4 target but this system never cant shot down 40 target missile same time!
gamekiiid 10 months ago
@gamekiiid As of this video release perhaps, but the new systems now (4-2011) can handle that task because of the multiple lasers that are mounted on the ship.
holywells 9 months ago
@holywells really woow. this is too bad for Iran!
gamekiiid 9 months ago
@gamekiiid Yes, it truly is, and it is also bad for anyone else that would become a target of these "killer lasers"!! I was wondering how long it would be before they actually put one of the new super high powered lasers into service. And now it is a reality.
holywells 9 months ago
They should have some of those for civilians to take out the chemtrail tankers that act like they have imunity to spray unknown aerosols, where can I buy one? Im sick of the geoengineering or whatever they are doing to lace the skys here in Los Angeles almost daily. I promise I wont use it on any planes that arnt spewing chemtrails.
RetroFishman 11 months ago
нахуй Б2 подорвали)) можно же было в шарик стрелять ^_^
PxIxRxAxTxE 11 months ago
Problem: The shot-down aircraft looked like the Aurora (a new spy plane being worked on in Area 51)
Clearly Aurora is real
This probably shows it can shoot down at supersonic speeds faster than light (Aurora is projected to fly at about 8000 mph)
th3thrilld3m0n 11 months ago
@th3thrilld3m0n I honestly cannot tell if you are serious or not
OneManA7x 10 months ago
@th3thrilld3m0n You've been reading too many conspiracy tabloids.
VengefulMilk 10 months ago
Wow! The G.I. Joe era has landed folks!
Killaroots7 11 months ago
Now we just need to make the lasers small enough to mount to shark heads.
eskercurve 11 months ago
@eskercurve Win.
ReachDeep1 11 months ago
@eskercurve lol...awesome
stiehler1117 11 months ago
@eskercurve lol its like something from red alert 2....
clovelywindheaven 11 months ago
@eskercurve quoted for awesomeness
martijnvdueren 9 months ago
We need to develop shields now
stiehler1117 11 months ago
@stiehler1117 You mean mirrors?
hvm2hvm 11 months ago
Now we can finally go "Pew Pew Pew" with real laser guns!!!
PedroMM193 11 months ago
Next footage of a gun fight in afghan will sound like "pewpewpew"
nachosNapples 1 year ago
haha and china thinks they have some crazy shit with their little copy of the f22. pussies. haha
cheanator 1 year ago
@cheanator
they dont need no technology, they could just storm into your house with their fucking big ass army of 1 million+.
superbarnie 1 year ago
Would you pay me a couple of thousand to take a baseball bat to a computer to test the bats breaking ability?
joeytrimble 1 year ago
@joeytrimble Those things at most cost maybe 1 grand each. And they're used to make sure the weapons systems work.
indoorin 1 year ago
nice now we're paying millions so the military can build drones so they can blow them up .. lovely
joeytrimble 1 year ago
@joeytrimble
You're paying millions so that you can sleep soundly at night, knowing that there's someone protecting you. Pull your head out of your ass, "joeytrimble".
tkach21 1 year ago
Next time, cover your missiles with mirrors.
looserofssuet 1 year ago
Well then, as long as the Mig-29's all fly in a straight line a low speed and altitude, we'll own em all :D
PsuPepperoni 1 year ago
@PsuPepperoni Actually, your new bullshit would work well if those Migs fly at hight altitudes where there won't be any obstacles. Low altitudes mean mountains and low plane visibility - you'd see its thin side rather than the belly whose area is larger and easier to target.
I don't think it's easy to dodge the laser, given that the targeting system is reactive and agile, which seems to be the case, so flying in non-straight lines won't be a problem.
hr1100 1 year ago
@PsuPepperoni Gotta start somewhere.
AthynKronos 1 year ago
@abxxxh well said..........
Simba5124 1 year ago
When are we going to be able to glass brown people with it?
abxxxh 1 year ago
suicide bombers are cheaper than ICBMs
emiliob7878 1 year ago
plastic mini-drone!
emiliob7878 1 year ago
@emiliob7878 fool
TFOKillSwitch 1 year ago
everything will look cooler when it has reflective armour
ben3580 1 year ago
That's fucking awesome
Craigyasable 1 year ago
real tesla technology
BrooklynNYC777 1 year ago
So much time to shoot down RC model?
PetrFM 1 year ago
@PetrFM the high power beam is not firing the whole time. the high power beam fires intermittently
cutty02 1 year ago
Comment removed
lonewolf90211 1 year ago
Oh, and calling me a "tard" really made me cry. Ha!
socaly4life 1 year ago
@theostor222 I downloaded the bit torrent of this clip( the best i could find) and then watched it clip-by-clip. No Splash... Plus the lighting on the water dramatically changes.
socaly4life 1 year ago
Yes, I believe everything I read on the the Internet too! Haha! Get over it.
socaly4life 1 year ago
Oh, I get it !!! This " Bad-Ass " laser, will replace the Navy's CIWS, on ships, and through in a couple of " Rail Guns " and LCS-1 & 2. Man you won't even see this coming.
MrJeffreydunson 1 year ago
@MrJeffreydunson
No... It will work as a cheap alternative to the CIWS, and will be installed WITH CIWS
cr9527 1 year ago
one powerful ass laser they got there
MusicRockLyrics 1 year ago
This is very sad pushing war, pushing weapons, pushing destruction, pushing death and making it OK, and losing our rights for it. This New World Order System.
fantamize 1 year ago
expensive test _O_
T42DJ 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Our cruisers can't repel firepower of that magnitude!
porsche911sbs 1 year ago
Damn the military better put a ALOT of money into laser research now, especially with the new DF 21D missle raping the pacific...
OneWayWCF 1 year ago
@OneWayWCF
DF-21 is useless, the Chinese would never be stupid enough to launch a ballistic missile in times of war. Ballistic missile warrants a direct nuclear retaliation.
cr9527 1 year ago
@cr9527 Then why would they build it in the first place? Obviously it probably won't be used until an all out war, but it is still direct threat to the Pacific fleet.
OneWayWCF 9 months ago
@OneWayWCF
It is a deterrent, like the nuclear weapons. But unlike the nuclear weapons, there is no evidence of it working.
It is still a threat, without a doubt, but it isn't a game changer, and the Chinese command will have to be really desperate to risk launching one.
cr9527 9 months ago
@cr9527 No, not entirely desperate. True there is no current evidence that it is working, but that's not an elligable chance that we should take. Plus the DF 21D is the first ASMB to be developed; it may not be used, but it definately promotes China's capabilty to operate U.S. naval intervention in the Taiwan Strait.
OneWayWCF 9 months ago
@OneWayWCF
Thing is, US isn't defenseless against DF-21either. From AEGIS to even basic fleet movement tactics can negate much of the threat of the DF-21.
I am not saying US shouldn't consider DF-21 as a threat, but like I've been repeating, it is not a game changer.
cr9527 9 months ago
@cr9527 I'm not too sure aboout that... True the U.S. may not be entirely defenseless, but the DF 21D moves at mark 10, giving U.S. carriers less than 10mins to react. That is if it can pick it up from 900miles away.
It's weapon capabilities haven't been tested yet so there's no certainty, however, it was created to be a game changer against the super carriers.
OneWayWCF 9 months ago
@OneWayWCF
First off, it's a large medium range ballistic missile. US has more than enough capability to monitor the entire world for these launches. From satellite assets to UAV, and even now the F-35 can track missile launches.
Secondly, the ONLY way for DF-21D to work is if China attacks the US navy without first declaring war
As soon as war breaks out, you can count on a systematic destruction of majority of launchers for ballistic missiles. There are so many effective counters for it.
cr9527 9 months ago
@cr9527 It's still considered a game changer. Yes, there may be ways to counter it through manoevours or other methods, but the primary anti-ballistic capabilities such as the AEGIS BMD has NO confirmation that it can protect against a DF-21D.
So far the only way to completely avoid it is to stay out of range. And that's exactly what we have done with the USS. Washington docking in the Sea of Japan during the training exercise with the ROK.
OneWayWCF 9 months ago
@OneWayWCF
Let's look at the worst case scenario, assuming PLAN can find the carrier, assuming DF-21D can find the target, assuming DF-21D can maneuver to a moving target, assuming SM-3 doesn't intercept during midcourse, assuming SM-2 doesn't intercept during terminal, Assuming RAM does nothing, congrats, DF-21D has just punched a small hole into the carrier's top few decks damaging a few aircraft and crew.
A few days of repair, and she'll be back into operation.
cr9527 9 months ago
@OneWayWCF
Then you can look at what is available to counter it.
More persistent air dominance along the coasts, drones, AEGIS, smart maneuvering, decoys, EW, I can go on.
The decision to take the fleet exercise east of Korea is a political, not a military one.
DF-21D, like all coastal defenses, will only work amongst other things, if you out range your target. This limitation forces you to place the batteries in very obvious and predictable locations.
Again, not a game changer.
cr9527 9 months ago
@cr9527 Okay, so there are many ways to counter this laser yes, but it is the FIRST one, meaning they finally got the basics down. And just like all other things, from that the US can expand from it, make it better. This just proves that lasers can be done, and they have a basic understanding of it now, so it is very much so a very big a game changer in that we now have a whole new unexplored technology which can be used for weaponry and may in the future have other affects to it.
tenbrion123 9 months ago
@tenbrion123
I have no doubt US will make a more battle suited laser system within the next 10 years.
cr9527 9 months ago
@cr9527 Trust me, with the unlimited amounts of tax$ flooding into the US military, anything is possible.
bassbass99able 9 months ago
@cr9527 "DF-21D, like all coastal defenses, will only work amongst other things, if you out range your target. This limitation forces you to place the batteries in very obvious and predictable locations."
They are not fixed to batteries, but are mobile (Yes can be moved whenever they want to). Therefore not predictable. To believe that China is a one trick pony when it comes to countering the carrier group is absurd. So yes, with it in China's arsenal now, it is very much a game changer.
pakjai 9 months ago
Comment removed
cr9527 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pakjai
They are mobile to the extent of mobile long ranged SAM launchers, which always performed disastrously worse in face against an organized force.
cr9527 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pakjai
They are mobile to the extent of mobile long range SAM launchers, which always performed disastrously worse in face against an organized force.
cr9527 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pakjai
They are mobile to the extent of mobile long/medium range SAM launchers, which always performed disastrously worse in face against an organized force.
cr9527 9 months ago
@pakjai
And since when were mobile defense launchers like SAMs performed well against an organized force?
cr9527 9 months ago
@cr9527
-Cont
They were always very predictable due to the necessity to maximize range for defense.
cr9527 9 months ago
@cr9527 Since when did an organized force engage a country such as China? It will come in handy no doubt if they were China's mobile SAMs. Considering that China isn't an unorganized force in itself.
pakjai 8 months ago
@pakjai
Kosovo, the serbs had the equivalent to the PLA back then, had vast arrays of strategic and tactical SAM launchers, but were rendered entirely useless.
I never said the PLA was disorganized, I stated that mobile strategic ballistic(medium-long range) missile launchers and Mobile strategic SAMs do not perform well against an organized force. This is why even the States do not use them.
They might be "Mobile", but are too few, and too slow to survive.
cr9527 8 months ago
@pakjai you dont get it, the days of SAM defenses and dogfighting are over... Its drones and sattelites now.
eddieisfiction 9 months ago
@eddieisfiction not yet but that time is close, if an massive war starts now there still will be dogfights and sams , and hi tech techiks like tanks in end of ww1
grumman84 8 months ago
@grumman84 more like intercontinental missles then tanks. Tanks would be more of already occupying a won territory, however high speed transports are alot better nowadays, since you can through a 50 cal or a mark 19 on those just fine.
eddieisfiction 8 months ago
good wepon all i need tho is my hi tech mirror to defend against such an attack
altoids79762 1 year ago
@altoids79762
you sir, are a genius
Svenmist 1 year ago
@altoids79762 This isnt the same type of laser as in a laser pointer, these lasers melt through 1 inch steel targets in a second, your mirror would be a puddle of glass on the floor, or at least left of it.
Sp33dyD3m0n 1 year ago
@Sp33dyD3m0n then how bout i have a lead mirrow with alluminum foil?
altoids79762 1 year ago
@altoids79762 Dude these things shoot missiles down in seconds from hundreds of miles away. Any way you can think to make a mirror stronger still wont be enough.
I always thought it would be cool to aim the turret at the ground ad just go to work, making a nice straight line of destruction on the ground below.
Sp33dyD3m0n 1 year ago
@Sp33dyD3m0n i imagine this as a pretty evil weapon ,no way you can avoid the weapon if you are unlucky enough to pull the short straw
altoids79762 1 year ago
@altoids79762 "pretty evil weapon"(quoted from altoids79762). I disagree with your use of the word evil in describing an inanimate object. The person behind the weapon may be evil, but not the weapon itself, as inanimate objects have no emotional characteristics. I would recommend replacing the word evil with the word Sinister or perhaps Scary.
Eguva 1 year ago
@Eguva c'mon tho we made nukes now we have incinerary lazers ima be shitting bricks now
altoids79762 1 year ago
@altoids79762 I believe you misunderstood me. I did not say you were wrong to be scared. I stated you were trying to get your point across in the wrong way.
Eguva 1 year ago
When can I buy one? I seem to have an infestation of moles that are calling for eradication by BFL (big fucking laser XD lol ).
Sp33dyD3m0n 1 year ago
@Sp33dyD3m0n hahahahah bfl
BrooklynNYC777 1 year ago
I wonder if this system was partially developed in response to the chinese anti-ship missile...Probly so..
JackRABBITslim27 1 year ago
@JackRABBITslim27 I dont believe that to be the case. As with most weapon systems in the USA they are developed and flown years before they are made public. With all the stuff we have and use just think of how much more cool stuff is kept in the dark. Just look back at the A-bomb, B2 stealth bomber and the stealth fighter and the U2 spy plane, all used in service before being announced.
Sp33dyD3m0n 1 year ago
We have these on airplanes now too for shooting down incoming missiles. I have seen the picture but forgot the name ( please reinform me if you know) and its pretty bad ass. Its actually 3 lasers in 1, 1 for distance locking, 2 to read atmospheric distortions and the final is the actual weapon.
Sp33dyD3m0n 1 year ago
@Sp33dyD3m0n That's the ABL 747 for first-stage missles...
thbs35 1 year ago
@thbs35 Thank you, yea Ive seen them flying around Writt-Patterson AFB in Dayton Ohio. Id like to get a closer look, but obviously that wont be happening.
Sp33dyD3m0n 1 year ago
ill be laughing at americans when they use this against the Violet heat vector shields on japanese sonic jets
Robindahoodz 1 year ago
@Robindahoodz Its meant for missiles not planes, the ABL isn't fast enough to catch up to the fighter to shoot i down.
Sp33dyD3m0n 1 year ago
All this money for war and death. Its sad.
fantamize 1 year ago