Love your Chomsky stuff, and I even think what you say about dating makes sense. Isn't it easier to pick up & successfully date women when you're tall, good looking, have good hair, etc., as those are also important to why one was able to have/build confidence over the years because of all the positive feedback being good looking has undoubtedly contributed hugely to them? Maybe a lot of people are so immersed in/indoctrinated by their own good looks that they can't relate to real world dating?
nvc and semantics are very important, i did marketing for 12 years and have to agree what this guy is saying is right. when you become very intuitive you'll see other benefits too
Want a chick? Here you go, fellas: You need confidence ...enough to follow through with your "cleverness" and to be able to just walk away. She has to really know you want(not need) to f*ck and believe it should happen ...that anything outside of this animal instinct(non-sexual rapport) is duly up to her.
Oh, and make sure she knows you can beat the shit out of her in any skill-based activity and can touche her anytime she gets cunty.
Presto! Now get out there and play. You're welcome.
Shit, in San Francisco I bet even the homeless guys get laid.
"Um, hey baby, do you want to come hang out with me under the bridge tonight? I have some hot pockets I scored from the dumpster we can warm up by the fire later."
I have a question Rhizome. You are obviously very successful in attracting women. Do you think you could keep and be with just one though? It is a different skill to stay with just one. I do not mean in some bullshit religious way. I mean out of one's own desire.
@mr1001nights I see. That definitely makes sense. The more options you have experienced certainly allows for the best choice. Thank you for responding.
I must say, I did not mean any disrespect with my question. It was an honest question.
@TheRagingFoxhound it works even for religious girls you need to text only! and for filthy ones, everything eh says is true even if you are a natural it is good to be aware of when u went right and wrong. i never seen this guy personally but similar stuff and general NLP & NVC stuff it works in marketing which is what women is all about. i did 12 years of marketing!
"which way is the apple store?" thereby subtly implying that you have disposable income to blow
i see what ya did there =)
i don't think there's anything wrong or sexist about being a "dating coach," but it is pretty fucking funny
i think i do alright in this department but i wouldn't be above taking lessons from someone because pimpin is a skill like any other. to think that you can't improve your game would be like thinking you're the "best" martial artist. there's always room to improve
@TheSmoothTerrorist my fundamental problem with all this alpha male tomfoolery is this:
1) I was a nice guy and I didn't get laid.
2) Then I bought media that showed me how to get laid
3) I used those strategies to get laid
My problem is '1)'. I don't think these guys are 'nice guys' after all. I think their just fucking 'tards. There are many ways to attract women, and this is a retarded way to do it. It seems like the "nice guy" feels entitled to woman = sexist.
attracting woman is not about intellect. it is about "skill" (where confidence plays a major role) for all men (about 90%) who are not born with certain features that make up for what is defined as "alpha male". but understanding the pattern of attraction/body language does not really require a specific level of intelligence. please stop abusing the word "intellect".
@mr1001nights nice guys don't get laid, writers don't get laid, funnymen don't get laid right? No, they're not really nice, the writing isn't good enough to impress anybody, they are not funny enough.
This idea that one must be a certain way to attract women is ludicrous, and the idea that they are all socially powerful too. What about the women you don't notice - she would no doubt love to be spoken to.
@Rad1ka1 You're right, I for one feel very uneasy. I'm assuming this whole thing is some kind of elaborate joke, intended to garner publicity and notoriety for himself as more & more people watch his stuff. He's not an anarchist, I've concluded, or at least he's a right-wing anarchist. No self-respecting leftie would tolerate his objectivising of women & treating them as a kind of commodity.
@Nai61a it is (your, among others) irrational presumptions that has been degrading the essential integrity of the left,ever since 1968.
clearly, dogma does not nessicerily need religion to exhibit it's ugly face. blind dogmatic feminist escapism should be seriously questioned by any geniune leftist
@tbktb Not sure why your comment is listed as "spam", but one of your comments came into my In box, so I'll assume you meant it. I'd like some clarification. Dogma isn't necessarily always associated with religion, but I do think that it's religious dogma which is the ugliest aspect of religion. I'd like to know what you mean by "blind dogmatic feminist escapism". Finally, everything ought to be questioned by everybody at some point, whether from the left or the right!
You need to get out more. I think it's been at least a few decades since any of the things you mentioned were popularly associated with "being gay" (as if gay guys look any particular way to begin with.)
Unless you live in Kansas or some similar corn fed shithole. In which case, I grieve for you. :-(
This is cool. I do like David DeAngelos stuff. I think its great to see intellectuals doing this stuff. The only thing I find difficult with this lifestyle of having lots of women in your life is kind of the male contempt, competition and jealousy involved.
@Nai61a I've never heard mr1001nights say anything that was woman hating, or sexist. He's talked a lot about evolutionary psychology. Is that what you meant?
@amido7 I'm assuming you're responding to something I apparently wrote here, but, curiously, I can't see any comment made by me! However, somewhere here he writes about how one can "get quality women" which, in my view is objectivising and sexist; his language frequently betrays him in this way, if you listen and read carefully.
@brownie1982ad I don't understand. The idea that men "don't get any" women is completely debunked by a look at the world around me. Am I missing something?
There are plenty of improperly socialized, overly shy males out there who either don't get the companionship they desire OR for whom figuring out "life's game" takes a very long time (and lots of painful experience.)
Additionally (especially during one's "single days") there is definitely a smaller group of males ("alpha males") who are getting an inordinate amount of female attention, while "betas" often go lonely for quite a long time.
@DemokraticRepublican Life isn't a bowl of cherries. What's new? The whining, "pity me" approach never resolved anything. Your comment (below) about basic biology suggests to me that the situation is unlikely to change. Become an "alpha" male (whatever that may mean).
Radfem "second wave" hold overs are a self selecting group, doomed to forever be an eccentric minority b/c they do not engage constructively with reality, but offer theory their dysfunctional misandry.
It never surprises me to find out a radfem is a damaged bull dyke (nothing wrong with being such - but being anti-social, man hating and pissy IS obnoxious), or some poor woman who has suffered greatly at the hands of the men in their lives.
A "quality woman" is the one you WANT, as opposed to the ones you feel you must settle for. What that criteria is varies from guy to guy.
And I hate to break it to you - but much of our aesthetic and physical preferences are less a matter of socialization than basic biology (facial symmetry, signs of fertility and health, etc.)
@DemokraticRepublican Forgive me, but it seems to me that you're the one who needs to come down to planet earth. My interpretation of what I see around me is that most men want the woman they get (at least for the duration of the relationship, that is). If the signal that one sends out to women is that one is settling for them, one would be unlikely to be impressive.
My physical attractiveness plays a role, but not the major role at all. As utube user Chomskyan could tell u, a few years back I acted much more incompetently with women & had far worse results--WITH THE SAME PHYSIQUE. What I've learned and I teach has only marginally to do with looks. & u can still get quality women w/o having my looks (have u never seen ugly guys w/hot girls?). At the very least you'll end up having more options with girls at ur attractiveness level.
A lot of how physically attractive someone is (especially men) has to do with presentation, even moreso than "hitting the gym" (though that certainly won't hurt you!)
I've seen guys who (with a good hair cut and some basic style advice) go from looking like goofy basement dwellers to someone who is well put together and even "sexy."
I had a giggle when I saw $60/hour. SF an expensive city huh?
There's quite a lot of different women shown in this short video. I am curious to know a few things, how long do your relationships typically last? Do you keep in touch with women you no longer date? Do some women ever rebuff you?
@Kropotkin2000 all great points ... these pua moves miss key things to building relationships, not to mention, if you decided you met a woman you want to have a long term with, a lot of these things that mm and rsd teach actually do emotional damage. some of the body language stuff is good to hear about, but they reversed the feminine-masculine dynamic, leaving women with unmet needs (and ultimately the men too, because many men in realionships need to feel adaquate )
No. Learning to talk to women & NOT creep them out (like so many guys do); learning to make women comfortable & learning to respond in a sensitive & competent manner to their body language opens the door for u for whichever type of relationship u want. It gives u the SAME options that most women have. YOU decide whether or not u want or know how to maintain a long-term relationship. The woman chooses which men she wants to stay long-term with. Or u want men to have no options?
I think that entirely depends on whose advice you're taking. I don't know enough about mr1001nights "methodology" to comment one way or another about what he teaches, but I don't think learning how to "not get in your own way" when trying to meet women who interest you is of itself entirely legit.
I actually feel a little bit disgusted by this and the fact that men have to play these ridicules games and learn it's rules. Guess that means I will get out of the circle of life at the end, but seeing the alternative I'm not that unhappy with that.
Truth be told, it only seems like "skeevy games" if one needs such an education in meeting women to begin with. Eventually it comes naturally, and won't seem like such a ridiculous racket.
Half of it is a numbers game (keep throwing 'til something sticks to the wall.) "Skillz" can make success more likely. Part of that is as simple as developing a certain amount of self knowledge and confidence...
"rhizome" lol. that aside, great. this enterprise should beat buddhagem's cordless jump rope with one hand tied behind it's back, with a cordless rope.
This has been flagged as spam show
Love your Chomsky stuff, and I even think what you say about dating makes sense. Isn't it easier to pick up & successfully date women when you're tall, good looking, have good hair, etc., as those are also important to why one was able to have/build confidence over the years because of all the positive feedback being good looking has undoubtedly contributed hugely to them? Maybe a lot of people are so immersed in/indoctrinated by their own good looks that they can't relate to real world dating?
munderlarkst 2 weeks ago
Isn't this kinda "capitalistic"?
Menace3434 3 weeks ago
nvc and semantics are very important, i did marketing for 12 years and have to agree what this guy is saying is right. when you become very intuitive you'll see other benefits too
boxermaf 1 month ago
@Nai61a Maybe he's appealing to men who have GIVEN IN to the expensive "sublims" of Bankers ?
Slave2PaperWithInkOn 1 month ago
great channel
sub
4
sub
beautynwoman 1 month ago
Want a chick? Here you go, fellas: You need confidence ...enough to follow through with your "cleverness" and to be able to just walk away. She has to really know you want(not need) to f*ck and believe it should happen ...that anything outside of this animal instinct(non-sexual rapport) is duly up to her.
Oh, and make sure she knows you can beat the shit out of her in any skill-based activity and can touche her anytime she gets cunty.
Presto! Now get out there and play. You're welcome.
TinQuasimodo 1 month ago
@TinQuasimodo *insert "like" to f*ck in place of "want" to f*ck. That is all. Peace.
TinQuasimodo 1 month ago
Shit, in San Francisco I bet even the homeless guys get laid.
"Um, hey baby, do you want to come hang out with me under the bridge tonight? I have some hot pockets I scored from the dumpster we can warm up by the fire later."
DefenceSpeech 1 month ago
I have a question Rhizome. You are obviously very successful in attracting women. Do you think you could keep and be with just one though? It is a different skill to stay with just one. I do not mean in some bullshit religious way. I mean out of one's own desire.
TheRagingFoxhound 1 month ago
@TheRagingFoxhound
What I teach allows you to have options so you can choose the best woman for you
mr1001nights 1 month ago
@mr1001nights I see. That definitely makes sense. The more options you have experienced certainly allows for the best choice. Thank you for responding.
I must say, I did not mean any disrespect with my question. It was an honest question.
TheRagingFoxhound 1 month ago
@mr1001nights Right to choose as a consumer! lol
brownie1982ad 1 month ago
@TheRagingFoxhound it works even for religious girls you need to text only! and for filthy ones, everything eh says is true even if you are a natural it is good to be aware of when u went right and wrong. i never seen this guy personally but similar stuff and general NLP & NVC stuff it works in marketing which is what women is all about. i did 12 years of marketing!
boxermaf 2 weeks ago
what a fucking pimp
dopeskies 1 month ago
Their be more Faggots in his bed than in Homer's Iliad.
PincheVatoMalo 1 month ago
"which way is the apple store?" thereby subtly implying that you have disposable income to blow
i see what ya did there =)
i don't think there's anything wrong or sexist about being a "dating coach," but it is pretty fucking funny
i think i do alright in this department but i wouldn't be above taking lessons from someone because pimpin is a skill like any other. to think that you can't improve your game would be like thinking you're the "best" martial artist. there's always room to improve
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist
Absolutely. Take a lesson with me bro. $50/hour is cheap and I think you will like it.
mr1001nights 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist my fundamental problem with all this alpha male tomfoolery is this:
1) I was a nice guy and I didn't get laid.
2) Then I bought media that showed me how to get laid
3) I used those strategies to get laid
My problem is '1)'. I don't think these guys are 'nice guys' after all. I think their just fucking 'tards. There are many ways to attract women, and this is a retarded way to do it. It seems like the "nice guy" feels entitled to woman = sexist.
Archiveofobscurity 1 month ago
attracting woman is not about intellect. it is about "skill" (where confidence plays a major role) for all men (about 90%) who are not born with certain features that make up for what is defined as "alpha male". but understanding the pattern of attraction/body language does not really require a specific level of intelligence. please stop abusing the word "intellect".
tbktb 1 month ago
I'm so glad you finally got a job you like that helps people!
prajnasword 2 months ago
@mr1001nights nice guys don't get laid, writers don't get laid, funnymen don't get laid right? No, they're not really nice, the writing isn't good enough to impress anybody, they are not funny enough.
This idea that one must be a certain way to attract women is ludicrous, and the idea that they are all socially powerful too. What about the women you don't notice - she would no doubt love to be spoken to.
Archiveofobscurity 2 months ago
@Archiveofobscurity Idea may be ludicrous but it happens to be true!
brownie1982ad 1 month ago
I like how he has all of the pictures of hot chicks he was with to prove his expertise on the subject.
rring88 2 months ago
Can you teach me how to be Spanish and good-looking?
catsajak 2 months ago 11
@catsajak he's quite average but h's got swagger, most virgins just need to get out of their comfort zone
boxermaf 1 month ago
/watch?v=Nx64_N4AA04
IndifferentSky 2 months ago
Some one's been reading Deleuze.
crud4 2 months ago
@Rad1ka1 You're right, I for one feel very uneasy. I'm assuming this whole thing is some kind of elaborate joke, intended to garner publicity and notoriety for himself as more & more people watch his stuff. He's not an anarchist, I've concluded, or at least he's a right-wing anarchist. No self-respecting leftie would tolerate his objectivising of women & treating them as a kind of commodity.
Nai61a 2 months ago
Comment removed
tbktb 1 month ago
Comment removed
tbktb 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nai61a it is (your, among others) irrational presumptions that has been degrading the essential integrity of the left,ever since 1968.
clearly, dogma does not nessicerily need religion to exhibit it's ugly face. blind dogmatic feminist escapism should be seriously questioned by any geniune leftist
tbktb 1 month ago
@tbktb Not sure why your comment is listed as "spam", but one of your comments came into my In box, so I'll assume you meant it. I'd like some clarification. Dogma isn't necessarily always associated with religion, but I do think that it's religious dogma which is the ugliest aspect of religion. I'd like to know what you mean by "blind dogmatic feminist escapism". Finally, everything ought to be questioned by everybody at some point, whether from the left or the right!
Nai61a 1 month ago
what are your credentials in this field
snakebitgoat 2 months ago
@snakebitgoat
Years of study and infield practice
mr1001nights 2 months ago
@mr1001nights Haha, my friends call it "trenchwork"
TinQuasimodo 1 month ago
@snakebitgoat
Slayin' the bitches it would seem. lol
DemokraticRepublican 2 months ago
No offence but I always thought you were gay, considering the mascara, earings etc
WOGI5M 2 months ago
@WOGI5M
You need to get out more. I think it's been at least a few decades since any of the things you mentioned were popularly associated with "being gay" (as if gay guys look any particular way to begin with.)
Unless you live in Kansas or some similar corn fed shithole. In which case, I grieve for you. :-(
DemokraticRepublican 2 months ago
Good luck.
MarkoKraguljac 2 months ago
I'm going to learn from Mr1001nights not only how to be a leftist radical, but also how to get women in the sack lol
Xsublime28xX 2 months ago 19
@Xsublime28xX bwhahahaha, exactly!!!
carlo88moe 2 months ago
You are a fricking show off! I know hate you lol! *joke*
brownie1982ad 2 months ago
@ChairmanNuke nutty feminist here lol
brownie1982ad 2 months ago
This is cool. I do like David DeAngelos stuff. I think its great to see intellectuals doing this stuff. The only thing I find difficult with this lifestyle of having lots of women in your life is kind of the male contempt, competition and jealousy involved.
Svankmajer 2 months ago
@Svankmajer the jealousy burns me up at night dude. If only I had the ability to attractionize women in banal social environments! GRAAAAAAAAAAH! =(
Archiveofobscurity 3 weeks ago
Sweepin' dem ladies offa their feeta!
Does she have a pottery cabinet?
carefulcarpenter 2 months ago
I don't like your PUA name. Mr. 1001 Nights is superior.
acpjrr 2 months ago
bosss playa!!!
iridespinners 2 months ago
hehehehe il fascino latino:)
great job friend
libertarian greetings
(A)
tomilia 2 months ago
@Rad1ka1 damn people are much more than politics, idk why people hating for
Charles0in0charge 2 months ago
Also have you read this? feministcritics org/blog/about/seduction-communitypickup-artists/
It is fairly interesting.
Rad1ka1 2 months ago
hahaha this is fuckin awesome this guy rocks pussy you don't know squat about econ guy but i respect your game. keep the pimp hand strong, comrade.
CommSense 2 months ago
You seem pretty creepy to me. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say your physical looks plays a bigger roll than you think.
ZamatoElite 2 months ago 2
@ZamatoElite I think his tallness does. Height can be more inportant than looks.
brownie1982ad 1 month ago
Comment removed
dubified89 6 days ago
Comment removed
dubified89 6 days ago
@Nai61a I've never heard mr1001nights say anything that was woman hating, or sexist. He's talked a lot about evolutionary psychology. Is that what you meant?
amido7 2 months ago
@amido7 I'm assuming you're responding to something I apparently wrote here, but, curiously, I can't see any comment made by me! However, somewhere here he writes about how one can "get quality women" which, in my view is objectivising and sexist; his language frequently betrays him in this way, if you listen and read carefully.
Nai61a 2 months ago
@Nai61a Woman look for quality men, who have high status, at least he is honest about what he does. Feminists are just hypocrites about it.
Also if you don't play these games with females you don't get any. What do you expect men to do?
brownie1982ad 2 months ago
@brownie1982ad I don't understand. The idea that men "don't get any" women is completely debunked by a look at the world around me. Am I missing something?
Nai61a 2 months ago
@Nai61a
There are plenty of improperly socialized, overly shy males out there who either don't get the companionship they desire OR for whom figuring out "life's game" takes a very long time (and lots of painful experience.)
Additionally (especially during one's "single days") there is definitely a smaller group of males ("alpha males") who are getting an inordinate amount of female attention, while "betas" often go lonely for quite a long time.
DemokraticRepublican 2 months ago
@DemokraticRepublican Life isn't a bowl of cherries. What's new? The whining, "pity me" approach never resolved anything. Your comment (below) about basic biology suggests to me that the situation is unlikely to change. Become an "alpha" male (whatever that may mean).
Nai61a 2 months ago
@Nai61a Pimpin' ain't easy.
TinQuasimodo 1 month ago
@brownie1982ad
Radfem "second wave" hold overs are a self selecting group, doomed to forever be an eccentric minority b/c they do not engage constructively with reality, but offer theory their dysfunctional misandry.
It never surprises me to find out a radfem is a damaged bull dyke (nothing wrong with being such - but being anti-social, man hating and pissy IS obnoxious), or some poor woman who has suffered greatly at the hands of the men in their lives.
DemokraticRepublican 2 months ago
@Nai61a
Come down to planet earth.
A "quality woman" is the one you WANT, as opposed to the ones you feel you must settle for. What that criteria is varies from guy to guy.
And I hate to break it to you - but much of our aesthetic and physical preferences are less a matter of socialization than basic biology (facial symmetry, signs of fertility and health, etc.)
DemokraticRepublican 2 months ago
@DemokraticRepublican Forgive me, but it seems to me that you're the one who needs to come down to planet earth. My interpretation of what I see around me is that most men want the woman they get (at least for the duration of the relationship, that is). If the signal that one sends out to women is that one is settling for them, one would be unlikely to be impressive.
Nai61a 2 months ago
@mr1001nights Do you understand that being Physically attractive might have more to do with your success then your word play?
St1kyFinguz 2 months ago
@St1kyFinguz
My physical attractiveness plays a role, but not the major role at all. As utube user Chomskyan could tell u, a few years back I acted much more incompetently with women & had far worse results--WITH THE SAME PHYSIQUE. What I've learned and I teach has only marginally to do with looks. & u can still get quality women w/o having my looks (have u never seen ugly guys w/hot girls?). At the very least you'll end up having more options with girls at ur attractiveness level.
mr1001nights 2 months ago
@mr1001nights
A lot of how physically attractive someone is (especially men) has to do with presentation, even moreso than "hitting the gym" (though that certainly won't hurt you!)
I've seen guys who (with a good hair cut and some basic style advice) go from looking like goofy basement dwellers to someone who is well put together and even "sexy."
DemokraticRepublican 2 months ago
I had a giggle when I saw $60/hour. SF an expensive city huh?
There's quite a lot of different women shown in this short video. I am curious to know a few things, how long do your relationships typically last? Do you keep in touch with women you no longer date? Do some women ever rebuff you?
Kropotkin2000 2 months ago
@Kropotkin2000 all great points ... these pua moves miss key things to building relationships, not to mention, if you decided you met a woman you want to have a long term with, a lot of these things that mm and rsd teach actually do emotional damage. some of the body language stuff is good to hear about, but they reversed the feminine-masculine dynamic, leaving women with unmet needs (and ultimately the men too, because many men in realionships need to feel adaquate )
rosskay 2 months ago
@rosskay
No. Learning to talk to women & NOT creep them out (like so many guys do); learning to make women comfortable & learning to respond in a sensitive & competent manner to their body language opens the door for u for whichever type of relationship u want. It gives u the SAME options that most women have. YOU decide whether or not u want or know how to maintain a long-term relationship. The woman chooses which men she wants to stay long-term with. Or u want men to have no options?
mr1001nights 2 months ago 2
@rosskay
I think that entirely depends on whose advice you're taking. I don't know enough about mr1001nights "methodology" to comment one way or another about what he teaches, but I don't think learning how to "not get in your own way" when trying to meet women who interest you is of itself entirely legit.
DemokraticRepublican 2 months ago
I actually feel a little bit disgusted by this and the fact that men have to play these ridicules games and learn it's rules. Guess that means I will get out of the circle of life at the end, but seeing the alternative I'm not that unhappy with that.
WaddyMuters 2 months ago
@WaddyMuters
Truth be told, it only seems like "skeevy games" if one needs such an education in meeting women to begin with. Eventually it comes naturally, and won't seem like such a ridiculous racket.
DemokraticRepublican 2 months ago
I notice that anyone can get women if they try enough and wait long enough. Just might take along time for some.
greenghost2008 2 months ago
@greenghost2008
Half of it is a numbers game (keep throwing 'til something sticks to the wall.) "Skillz" can make success more likely. Part of that is as simple as developing a certain amount of self knowledge and confidence...
...but there are certainly pointers to be had.
DemokraticRepublican 2 months ago
That's great. Sounds interesting. What is the essence of romance and what are the rules to getting it?
lovingsingleton 2 months ago
@lovingsingleton
If you are interested in lessons, go to my website and contact me through E-mail first.
mr1001nights 2 months ago
"rhizome" lol. that aside, great. this enterprise should beat buddhagem's cordless jump rope with one hand tied behind it's back, with a cordless rope.
gratex 2 months ago