i come back and watch this video and tell people about it. i can't describe it. a person has to see it and then come back and see it again and again. it's amazing, big ups!
id been painting "doze none" for several years until discovered there was another doze, i started writing alias. i think there is a number of them along with a dozes. dozer. dozey etc. i was almost considering writing "doze blue" seeing is how my middle name is legally "blue" and i have "doze" tattooed on me im pretty much stuck with the two names.
bricology either has low self esteem, or was spoiled growing up. maybe both. let's just say both and let's say he just wants to feel accepted. your brown nosing will only burn your eyes, chavo.
Pretty amazing how a video barely over one minute can generated such silly replies. YouTube brings the worst out of people... where anything shared simply MUST be a statement of ultimate skill of all time! (Anyone over 80 knows what a i mean SURELY....!!!111one). Lol.
Search YouTube for "picasso painting apple" and see where Doze Green got his idea for reverse-glass painting. And Picasso, Calder and a slew of other famous artists have done pictures with a single, unbroken line. Oh well, at least no one under 40 knows their art history, so his secrets are safe.
There's always some clown playing the "all knowing great one". This video is purely a demonstration of skill - Green does not claim to have invented either glass painting or unbroken line drawing. There are no "secrets".
I don't claim to be "all knowing"; just knowing more than those who overpraise this. And there are ALWAYS secrets in art; don't presume they don't exist simply because you're not in on them. Turrell, Kapoor, Cragg, Richard Long, etc., -- even some of Doze Green's work contains "secrets", although more superficially than those I mentioned.
why'd you have to go and get so damned pompous? And the "under 40" comment was silly and presumptuous of you. Go kneel before long dead dinosaurs if you want to, but don't chastise others for recognizing new talent and skill.
A generalism, I freely admit. But I'm "in the art world", and I have come into contact with hundreds of people under 40, and most of them simply don't know their art history. You might be surprised by how many of them think they've invented the same things that people like Yves Klein, Duchamp, Maciunas, Beuys, Cage and others did decades ago.
could you please elaborate on picasso and calder? i'm making a body of work with single line drawing and that'd be really helpful background info. if not i'll just google it. :P
Picasso did a number of pencil drawings made up of a single line. I've seen one he did in about 1918 that was of two Saltimbanques, made of a single pencil line. Calder's preferred media was wire, and he would routinely do a 3-D portrait of a person nearby in a single piece of wire, bent with his hands and a pair of pliers. If you Google Image Search calder + wire + portrait, you'll find lots of examples. Hope this helps.
Where is the video claiming that he's the first to do these things? Art is always an imitation of earlier art, with a bit of the artist's own interpretation. What's cool here is that we get to see it happen. It's like listening to an orchestra: the music they're playing has been performed many times before, but the thrill is seeing the skill required first hand.
"Art is always an imitation of earlier art, with a bit of the artist's own interpretation." A common notion nowadays, and utter rubbish. Please point out the artistic "imitation" in the work of say, James Turrell, Anish Kapoor or Richard Long. Fact is, you can't. Original art is being made all the time; Doze Green just isn't demonstrating it here.
Art is not required to come from nowhere. Fact is, nobody creates in a vacuum save maybe on or two "outsider artists." And even they are influenced by the man made things around them. I think "fine" arts began to go in the wrong direction when people began painting one, specific, weird way as if marking their own aesthetic territory. Sure you can copywrite an image but not a method of creating.
Art may not be "required to come from nowhere", but if its inspirations are obvious, then it's not particularly original, and the professional art world values and rewards originality. Claims that "nobody creates in a vacuum" as some excuse for copying others is just that -- an excuse. If you think you're up to it, try to show the artistic precedents for Turrell, Kapoor, Cragg, Richard Long and Wolfgang Laib.
Turrell takes a minimalist approach sculpture a step further by introducing the element of light and how it affects the installation space. A concept prophecized by Moholy-Nagy's Light-Space Modulator (1921-30). Kapoor takes the aesthetics of Earth art and places it in an installation environment, precedents/contemoporaries include Smithson's Spiral Jetty (1970) and Indian sand art.
Not even close. For Turrell, the medium has always been light itself; it's not reductive at all. I've spoken to the man myself about this and related subjects. If Turrell owes a debt to M-N (and I doubt he does), explain where M-N's artistic debt lies. Kapoor as an Earth Artist?! You don't know what you're talking about. Kapoor is all about the mystery of the void, something "Spiral Jetty" is NOT about.
I'm so tired of "fine" artists and they're insistence of joyless pontificating. Anytime someone simply makes art simply out of pure pleasure they're lambasted as backwards, sentimental, and unoriginal. Pull your head out your high and mighty ass, buy a sketch book, and go to a park or a cafe and remember why people create in the first place.
1. Doze Green isn't just making "art simply out of pure pleasure"; he also makes his living by selling it. Things like this film are promotion for that livelihood.
2. "Buy a sketch book"? Uh -- yeah. I've been having solo shows in galleries and been in museum shows since you were in kindergarten. People are free to critique my work, just as I am free to critique others'. Artists have to have thick skins; their supporters should too.
Fine, you can have you're gallery shows. I'm nowhere near the level you probably are as an artist. Doesn't change the fact you're being a condescending, pompous asshole as if the museums who show you granted you a license to do so.
Look I never actually disagreed with you. You're the one who began quizzing people on subjects that you're an expert on then waving your ego at us like a bully who dangles a kid's hat just above his reach.
too cool!
TheArtattacks 1 week ago
sick as fuck
Kbo3o3 3 months ago
nice
RevolverGraphix 5 months ago
AWESOME - AUSSERGEWÖHNLICH - EXTRAORDINÀRIO!
wickirsinn 1 year ago
DOPE ! ]
mar10scorz 1 year ago
Watch the mouth fill in as it settles.
kayjeph 1 year ago
doze? like no dozes the pill ? lol jkjk
wheatpaster33 2 years ago
i come back and watch this video and tell people about it. i can't describe it. a person has to see it and then come back and see it again and again. it's amazing, big ups!
v32un 2 years ago
id been painting "doze none" for several years until discovered there was another doze, i started writing alias. i think there is a number of them along with a dozes. dozer. dozey etc. i was almost considering writing "doze blue" seeing is how my middle name is legally "blue" and i have "doze" tattooed on me im pretty much stuck with the two names.
VandalousMedium 2 years ago
Big Doze fan... Advancing Evolution of style is everything. One...
isolatedstyle 3 years ago
is that the same doze green form "Just for kicks"????
plomazos 3 years ago
bricology either has low self esteem, or was spoiled growing up. maybe both. let's just say both and let's say he just wants to feel accepted. your brown nosing will only burn your eyes, chavo.
uhohuhoh 3 years ago
lol..now days kids be sweatin one liner throws..
this shit kills one liner throws
radaronwot 4 years ago
Doze Pollock! Nice one.. Super slick.
petenawara 4 years ago
Doze Fucking kicks some major ass- beautiful line work. I love motion painting- rock on doZe!
djdarkat 4 years ago
fucking amazing artwork
CRE8CBDK 4 years ago
Doze is an amaing artist.He can move paint around like no other artist.Mighty is the paintbrush of Doze green
valleus 4 years ago
Pretty amazing how a video barely over one minute can generated such silly replies. YouTube brings the worst out of people... where anything shared simply MUST be a statement of ultimate skill of all time! (Anyone over 80 knows what a i mean SURELY....!!!111one). Lol.
Seguesound 4 years ago
Search YouTube for "picasso painting apple" and see where Doze Green got his idea for reverse-glass painting. And Picasso, Calder and a slew of other famous artists have done pictures with a single, unbroken line. Oh well, at least no one under 40 knows their art history, so his secrets are safe.
bricology 4 years ago
There's always some clown playing the "all knowing great one". This video is purely a demonstration of skill - Green does not claim to have invented either glass painting or unbroken line drawing. There are no "secrets".
Everyone under 40 realises you are a goose.
BabsonTask 4 years ago
I don't claim to be "all knowing"; just knowing more than those who overpraise this. And there are ALWAYS secrets in art; don't presume they don't exist simply because you're not in on them. Turrell, Kapoor, Cragg, Richard Long, etc., -- even some of Doze Green's work contains "secrets", although more superficially than those I mentioned.
bricology 4 years ago
why'd you have to go and get so damned pompous? And the "under 40" comment was silly and presumptuous of you. Go kneel before long dead dinosaurs if you want to, but don't chastise others for recognizing new talent and skill.
fawazr 4 years ago
A generalism, I freely admit. But I'm "in the art world", and I have come into contact with hundreds of people under 40, and most of them simply don't know their art history. You might be surprised by how many of them think they've invented the same things that people like Yves Klein, Duchamp, Maciunas, Beuys, Cage and others did decades ago.
bricology 4 years ago
could you please elaborate on picasso and calder? i'm making a body of work with single line drawing and that'd be really helpful background info. if not i'll just google it. :P
fugmuffin 4 years ago
Picasso did a number of pencil drawings made up of a single line. I've seen one he did in about 1918 that was of two Saltimbanques, made of a single pencil line. Calder's preferred media was wire, and he would routinely do a 3-D portrait of a person nearby in a single piece of wire, bent with his hands and a pair of pliers. If you Google Image Search calder + wire + portrait, you'll find lots of examples. Hope this helps.
bricology 4 years ago
Where is the video claiming that he's the first to do these things? Art is always an imitation of earlier art, with a bit of the artist's own interpretation. What's cool here is that we get to see it happen. It's like listening to an orchestra: the music they're playing has been performed many times before, but the thrill is seeing the skill required first hand.
craigiest 4 years ago
"Art is always an imitation of earlier art, with a bit of the artist's own interpretation." A common notion nowadays, and utter rubbish. Please point out the artistic "imitation" in the work of say, James Turrell, Anish Kapoor or Richard Long. Fact is, you can't. Original art is being made all the time; Doze Green just isn't demonstrating it here.
bricology 4 years ago
Art is not required to come from nowhere. Fact is, nobody creates in a vacuum save maybe on or two "outsider artists." And even they are influenced by the man made things around them. I think "fine" arts began to go in the wrong direction when people began painting one, specific, weird way as if marking their own aesthetic territory. Sure you can copywrite an image but not a method of creating.
ChrisSketch 4 years ago
Art may not be "required to come from nowhere", but if its inspirations are obvious, then it's not particularly original, and the professional art world values and rewards originality. Claims that "nobody creates in a vacuum" as some excuse for copying others is just that -- an excuse. If you think you're up to it, try to show the artistic precedents for Turrell, Kapoor, Cragg, Richard Long and Wolfgang Laib.
bricology 4 years ago
Turrell takes a minimalist approach sculpture a step further by introducing the element of light and how it affects the installation space. A concept prophecized by Moholy-Nagy's Light-Space Modulator (1921-30). Kapoor takes the aesthetics of Earth art and places it in an installation environment, precedents/contemoporaries include Smithson's Spiral Jetty (1970) and Indian sand art.
ChrisSketch 4 years ago
Not even close. For Turrell, the medium has always been light itself; it's not reductive at all. I've spoken to the man myself about this and related subjects. If Turrell owes a debt to M-N (and I doubt he does), explain where M-N's artistic debt lies. Kapoor as an Earth Artist?! You don't know what you're talking about. Kapoor is all about the mystery of the void, something "Spiral Jetty" is NOT about.
bricology 4 years ago
Gee, you've actually talked to the person? Pretty much anything I could have said would have been answered "HA! Wrong!!"
ChrisSketch 4 years ago
I just googled the rest of the names. Jesus, do you idolize and drop the names of any artists who are NOT 21st century abstract sculpters?
ChrisSketch 4 years ago
All of them were working in the 20th century as well. Should I be talking about Renaissance artists instead?
bricology 4 years ago
Scuze me. 20th century. The point is that your tastes seemed to be rather narrow and if it was wider you're argument could have been stronger.
ChrisSketch 4 years ago
I'm so tired of "fine" artists and they're insistence of joyless pontificating. Anytime someone simply makes art simply out of pure pleasure they're lambasted as backwards, sentimental, and unoriginal. Pull your head out your high and mighty ass, buy a sketch book, and go to a park or a cafe and remember why people create in the first place.
ChrisSketch 4 years ago
1. Doze Green isn't just making "art simply out of pure pleasure"; he also makes his living by selling it. Things like this film are promotion for that livelihood.
2. "Buy a sketch book"? Uh -- yeah. I've been having solo shows in galleries and been in museum shows since you were in kindergarten. People are free to critique my work, just as I am free to critique others'. Artists have to have thick skins; their supporters should too.
bricology 4 years ago
Fine, you can have you're gallery shows. I'm nowhere near the level you probably are as an artist. Doesn't change the fact you're being a condescending, pompous asshole as if the museums who show you granted you a license to do so.
Look I never actually disagreed with you. You're the one who began quizzing people on subjects that you're an expert on then waving your ego at us like a bully who dangles a kid's hat just above his reach.
ChrisSketch 4 years ago
shut up. you both sound like huge twats, and you've wasted more time with this stupid argument than necessary.
babydaggers 4 years ago
wow...awesome.
mellowknees72 4 years ago
He's obviously had LOADS of practice
StargazingStranger 4 years ago
fucking amazing
niabren 4 years ago
Yeah, I like seeing his ish..
DrFstop 5 years ago
Great video!
artwarstreetart 5 years ago
Doze Green doing Jackson Pollock, smoking a cigarette and being all, Doze Green and shit.
robbryn 5 years ago
super smooth oneline....great!!!!lov it!
cjennow 5 years ago
sick shit
4Blaster2Master0 5 years ago