That's pretty weakly thought through on the gas delivery to the projectile..hell the whole projectile thing is poorly thought through..it's water and air, all you need is a diaphram that has water inside that gets compressed by air on the outside..
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It is very clear what this is, you simply do not have the ability to understand, your IQ is just to low... look up "sonar luminescence" your small brain maybe able to understand the concepts behind it such as zero point energy but it is doubtful...
If your so bright, then perhaps you can explain why "sonar luminescence" is worth weaponizing anyway! And it's sonoluminescence. If your going to be a snob do it right. Go research what happened to the Purdue professor and get back here.
It sends a small directed shock wave through water. If compressed enough, it could crush through a body using that water's mass and great ability to transmit waves of many frequencies.
read the description you fucking idiot. It clearly states, "inspired by the pistol shrimp" meaning it shoots bubbles so fast that when they collapse they momentarily reach the temperature of the sun, and the shockwaves stun the prey. go look up pistol shrimp
also that spring would have to be stiff enough to counter the pressure building ahead of the piston. that just counteracts the kinetic energy from the piston to drive the plunger. might as well ditch pneumatic recocking and use that spring to do it mechanically.
where does the gas that was driving the piston go? i thought that crack at the end of the barrel bleeds it out but if it did then the gas that was in front of the piston would also bleed off. are two different gases used?
if not bled off the pressures would equalize and the piston will not return.
soooo...it's a water gun???
ZebbMassiv 3 months ago
haha is this a joke? the trigger is'nt even hooked up to anything.
ak7wyf 5 months ago
@ak7wyf
Yeah, no shit.
OraleLocoVato 5 months ago
Water doesn't compress.
OraleLocoVato 9 months ago
@OraleLocoVato ya think? no shit
ak7wyf 5 months ago
@OraleLocoVato that's the point of the "weapon"...it obviously uses compressed gas for power...
AKAtheA 1 month ago
GAY!!!
Orion8086 9 months ago
GO PISTOL SHRIMP GO!
krap101 1 year ago
That's pretty weakly thought through on the gas delivery to the projectile..hell the whole projectile thing is poorly thought through..it's water and air, all you need is a diaphram that has water inside that gets compressed by air on the outside..
CreQ 1 year ago
Its a harpoon....
urosh911 1 year ago
and what is this supposed to be used for??
bazengao 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
okayillgonow 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It is very clear what this is, you simply do not have the ability to understand, your IQ is just to low... look up "sonar luminescence" your small brain maybe able to understand the concepts behind it such as zero point energy but it is doubtful...
UnholySavagery 2 years ago
If your so bright, then perhaps you can explain why "sonar luminescence" is worth weaponizing anyway! And it's sonoluminescence. If your going to be a snob do it right. Go research what happened to the Purdue professor and get back here.
unambitious 2 years ago
LOL that was a joke, I would never be that rude!
UnholySavagery 2 years ago
Oh well nevermind then.
okayillgonow 2 years ago
It sends a small directed shock wave through water. If compressed enough, it could crush through a body using that water's mass and great ability to transmit waves of many frequencies.
Water Wave bullets.
joelito101 2 years ago
read the description you fucking idiot. It clearly states, "inspired by the pistol shrimp" meaning it shoots bubbles so fast that when they collapse they momentarily reach the temperature of the sun, and the shockwaves stun the prey. go look up pistol shrimp
mephil8800 2 years ago
Well, sorry for asking a question. user blocked.
okayillgonow 2 years ago
Fuck you. comment spam.
okayillgonow 2 years ago
look up light gas gun
piston could be driven via gauss
overall i think a mechanical approach would be better than pneumatically
ZO6 4 years ago
also that spring would have to be stiff enough to counter the pressure building ahead of the piston. that just counteracts the kinetic energy from the piston to drive the plunger. might as well ditch pneumatic recocking and use that spring to do it mechanically.
ZO6 4 years ago
where does the gas that was driving the piston go? i thought that crack at the end of the barrel bleeds it out but if it did then the gas that was in front of the piston would also bleed off. are two different gases used?
if not bled off the pressures would equalize and the piston will not return.
ZO6 4 years ago