@eu000000000 You have yet to substantiate that claim with any kind of credible evidence. On the other hand I have shown plenty of evidence that it is you that lack IQ and have nothing to laugh about.
@eu000000000 "it was Clinton who pushed Freddie and Fannie to lend money to subprime home lenders." Yet another misrepresentation. You can't reference one credible link to substantiate this myth. I'm sure you repeat it often though and if someone calls you on it what do you say? "Yer stupid?" Brilliant!
@srhanna Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending - New York Times google it
Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.
@eu000000000 You are calling me stupid and low IQ'ed? You can't even properly name the law that you are referring to. The Glass-Steagall Act was introduced by two Democrats Senator Carter Glass & Henry B. Steagall. The bill that repealed the act was introduced by two Republicans Phil Gramm and Jim Leach. That bill was passed by a, majority Republican, party line vote. This info is on Wikipedia. Once again you lie. Then when I disagree you call me stupid. What a punk you are.
@srhanna the gramm leach bliley act was passed in 1999 with bipartisan support in the house and senate and signed into law by clinton. it got 90 votes in the senate and 362 in the house.
@eu000000000 Yes that's a very good debate strategy. Misrepresent, obfuscate, or just plain lie. Then, when people disagree with you, tell them they are stupid. Yea, you should get a lot of people to change their political affiliations that way. Maybe not the way that you hoped. LOL
Yes that's a very good debate strategy. Misrepresent, obfuscate, or just plain lie. Then, when people disagree with you, tell them they are stupid. Yea, you should get a lot of people to change their political affiliations that way. Maybe not the way that you hoped. LOL
@eu000000000 I'm really dumb? Just because I don't believe the stupid lies you promote, hardly makes me "dumb." Bin Laden is not the only one that wants to attack the USA. His capture would have done nothing to stop the attacks on us. The USA has been involved in the killing and wars of the middle east for a very long time. The 911 attacks were just one of many installments, of a lot of payback, the USA can expect; Bin Laden or no Bin Laden. The CIA knows this.
I don't disagree with the general sentiment you have against Obama. At this time however, he is the best we can do. The alternative is to sit out the election and allow the party that started the wars, deregulated the financial system, allowed corporate corruption to run unchecked over our governmental systems and military to win again. Haven't you had enough already? I have.
@srhanna deregulation occurred under clinton as did the policies forced banks to boost subprime loans as reported by the new york times in 1999. i am less concerned with military spending seeing as it has declined as a percentage of GDP by over 50% over the last 50 years. spending on entitlements on the other hand, is up over 200% during the same period of time. cost of social security $7 trillion, medicare is $36 trillion, US economy $13 trillion, tax revenues $2.2 trillion. increase spending?
@allbuss84 "deregulation occurred under clinton" Really? What deregulation are you referring to exactly?
"concerned with military spending seeing as it has declined as a percentage of GDP by over 50% over the last 50 years" This is just another example of cheap conservative lying with statistics, only leave out any credible statistics and that is the kind of lying that I see you doing.
@srhanna Taking apart the federal budget - washington post google it, click spending type, historical. also google comptroller general david walker of the gao. read through the financial sustainability presentations. there are no statistics, just pie charts and graphs that show %spending. the gao is the top accounting agency for the federal government
Now we know who is truely running the Central Banks!!!!
BradNC11175 7 months ago
@eu000000000 You have yet to substantiate that claim with any kind of credible evidence. On the other hand I have shown plenty of evidence that it is you that lack IQ and have nothing to laugh about.
srhanna 10 months ago
Yep that's liberal economics
tjohn1986 11 months ago
@eu000000000 "it was Clinton who pushed Freddie and Fannie to lend money to subprime home lenders." Yet another misrepresentation. You can't reference one credible link to substantiate this myth. I'm sure you repeat it often though and if someone calls you on it what do you say? "Yer stupid?" Brilliant!
srhanna 1 year ago
@srhanna Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending - New York Times google it
Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.
allbuss84 1 week ago
@eu000000000 You are calling me stupid and low IQ'ed? You can't even properly name the law that you are referring to. The Glass-Steagall Act was introduced by two Democrats Senator Carter Glass & Henry B. Steagall. The bill that repealed the act was introduced by two Republicans Phil Gramm and Jim Leach. That bill was passed by a, majority Republican, party line vote. This info is on Wikipedia. Once again you lie. Then when I disagree you call me stupid. What a punk you are.
srhanna 1 year ago
@srhanna the gramm leach bliley act was passed in 1999 with bipartisan support in the house and senate and signed into law by clinton. it got 90 votes in the senate and 362 in the house.
allbuss84 1 week ago
@eu000000000 Yes that's a very good debate strategy. Misrepresent, obfuscate, or just plain lie. Then, when people disagree with you, tell them they are stupid. Yea, you should get a lot of people to change their political affiliations that way. Maybe not the way that you hoped. LOL
srhanna 1 year ago
Yes that's a very good debate strategy. Misrepresent, obfuscate, or just plain lie. Then, when people disagree with you, tell them they are stupid. Yea, you should get a lot of people to change their political affiliations that way. Maybe not the way that you hoped. LOL
srhanna 1 year ago
@eu000000000 I'm really dumb? Just because I don't believe the stupid lies you promote, hardly makes me "dumb." Bin Laden is not the only one that wants to attack the USA. His capture would have done nothing to stop the attacks on us. The USA has been involved in the killing and wars of the middle east for a very long time. The 911 attacks were just one of many installments, of a lot of payback, the USA can expect; Bin Laden or no Bin Laden. The CIA knows this.
srhanna 1 year ago
@thefiestymexican
I don't disagree with the general sentiment you have against Obama. At this time however, he is the best we can do. The alternative is to sit out the election and allow the party that started the wars, deregulated the financial system, allowed corporate corruption to run unchecked over our governmental systems and military to win again. Haven't you had enough already? I have.
srhanna 1 year ago
@srhanna deregulation occurred under clinton as did the policies forced banks to boost subprime loans as reported by the new york times in 1999. i am less concerned with military spending seeing as it has declined as a percentage of GDP by over 50% over the last 50 years. spending on entitlements on the other hand, is up over 200% during the same period of time. cost of social security $7 trillion, medicare is $36 trillion, US economy $13 trillion, tax revenues $2.2 trillion. increase spending?
allbuss84 1 year ago
@allbuss84 "deregulation occurred under clinton" Really? What deregulation are you referring to exactly?
"concerned with military spending seeing as it has declined as a percentage of GDP by over 50% over the last 50 years" This is just another example of cheap conservative lying with statistics, only leave out any credible statistics and that is the kind of lying that I see you doing.
srhanna 1 year ago
@srhanna Taking apart the federal budget - washington post google it, click spending type, historical. also google comptroller general david walker of the gao. read through the financial sustainability presentations. there are no statistics, just pie charts and graphs that show %spending. the gao is the top accounting agency for the federal government
allbuss84 1 week ago
@allbuss84 "deregulation occurred under clinton as did the policies forced banks to boost subprime loans"
Deregulation does not force anything. Your logic sucks as much as your grammar.
srhanna 1 year ago
Costs of war = High Priority.
Costs of Unemployment Compensation = Budget buster.
Republicans are worried about BP getting a "shakedown". Too much government involvement in health care. And unnecessary restrictions on banks.
The Republican Party - The party of war, corporate greed, and NO.
srhanna 1 year ago
GAGZ WON MYSPACE?????
ericarocks2 1 year ago
that proves it ma and pa were liberals
bamasace 2 years ago