"Let us never tolerate the outrageous 9/11 Fairy tale - malicious lies, deception and fraud. A criminal effort to shift the blame away from those who committed treason. Traitors label of the search for the truth a conspiracy, which effectively muzzles the Constitutional Right of Freedom of Speech allowing the Bush Administration/CIA/Traitors to shift the blame away from themselves, away from the guilty." - We The People
@TheNYLibertarian: Nothing conspiratorial or theoretical about the rate and manner in which wtc 7 came down. Not to mention the explosive destruction of the Twin Towers...the 100 day fires, molten *metal shown in the fema bpat appdx. C, the iron microspheres, the squibs, the pulverized concrete, 1100 missing human beings, or the hi-tech thermitic explosives found in the dust. The evidence is so broad and well documented the conclusion that they were demolished with explosives is irrefutable.
Why dont u do ur math? go MEASURE the acceleration frame by frame for yourself. Then come back. else your opinion is meaningless, null & void- just hot air blown out of an ass
The government didn't like JFK. When he was killed the FBI didn't investigate the killing. A president is killed and they said there was a magic bullet. Obviously there was more to the story and they may have even done it themselves. If a normal person is killed they do better investigations than that. JFK's head went backward which means he was shot from the front. They said Oswald was behind in the 6th floor of the building would be impossible to make that shot. We were lied to.
I thank you for your work. Real scientific analysis is needed to bring some actual attention to the matter. All too often, people conclude one way or another about 9/11 before hearing any of the evidence, and the argument becomes a contest of how many mistakes one side can point out about the other, or which side of the argument has the most "crazies", and the hard science gets ignored or bypassed. I am someone who sees a need for investigation, not a "theorist". We need facts, not theories.
This video should have alot more than 100K views....all I want is those who believe the official story to address this analysis. What can you argue with?
Science. That is what tells someone who believes in numbers and facts that 911 was an inside job. Brilliant work! Pythagoras was right. Numbers don't lie, people do.
You WILL NOT hear intelligent discussions on bldg 7 from our "free press". The only free press in the USA are independent news sources which very few people are aware of. Amy Goodman on Free Speech TV is among the most widely recognized. Most "news" in the mainstream media consists of things like verbatim, unquestioned copies of press releases from the CIA.
I'm so sad for families which have a son killed in Iraq and they think he somehow died for their "free press".
7 world trade center was in fact demolished , good to see logic on utube rather then propaganda from government idiots trying to take attention away from the truth
Even when the evidence is shown clearly and scientifically and the Corrupt Government body NIST is compelled to admit freefall, there will be those stamping their feet and crying - "I don't believe it, I won't believe it no no no boo hoo hoo, it can't be true, there must be a Father Christmas my daddy told me and he would never lie to me". Head in the sand & bum in the air brigade.
The building wasn't damaged by the towers. This was imploded. And your work is excellent to show us that it was imploded! Free fall could only happen if the roof started falling without floors beneath! For those of that passed 5th grade..we can understand this! Thanks so much!!
All my comments on mainstream media about 9/11 inside job, and other people's ones have been all removed.. funny huh? Open the website of murdered Danny Jowenko who's interview is here on Youtube... his last name and then dot com. The intro will show how building 7 was done.
Nice vid, but pushing a stick in to the hornets nest is just going to upset the wasps ...I would love to be optimistic but the gov is still sticking to the official story about JFK all these years later...i just can not see the cops rocking up to mr Bush's house with a warrant do ya know what i mean....
@RawfullMyEggroll Yes. Whoever put explosives in the buildings are terrorists. i think its very telling that 'terrorist' by your (even unconscious) definition must exclude American establishmentarians... or Israelis, or any others except Muslim extremists. The media has done a fine job of indoctrinating the gullible American public to equate Arabs with 'terrorists'.
I wonder if Bush is going to the 10th anniversary of 911 in NY. It happened on his watch. I wonder if he would stand there with all the people who feel its an inside job. Would he ever break the skull & bones code of silence and tell the American people what really happened or go to the grave knowing the secret???
When debunkers keep losing arguments and overlooking the facts it makes you wonder who these people really are. They try to use ridicule as their first step in order to scare off the newcomers. Name calling and harassment is better than having scientific arguments where they always lose. Do your research, but only look at facts and don´t get distracted by anything that suggests it could´ve been something else than what the evidence points to. No gigantic lasers or crazy martians. Just facts.
Thumbs up for the Scientists that FOUND the EXPLOSIVES in the Dust: Neils H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R Larsen, THANK YOU for finding the TRUTH!
@jallisah14 According to the Sumerian tablets, the ancient serpents were the gods that created us, in their own image. Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction.
I don't like praying, especially in front of people. September 12th 2001 I stood out front of my highschool with hundreds of classmates, held hands and we prayed for the victims of 9-11. I'll be god-damned if I dont find the most honest explanation as to why thousands of fellow americans were carelessly murdered. It's our job as compassionate humans to find out the truth. And if any of us knew the truth we wouldn't be arguing about this incident 11 years after the fact. Lets get it together.
Cover-up....period... May the ones that are potentially involved in this mass murder burn in hell for eternity... My heart goes out to all those lives that were lost..My prayers are going out to thier families....
The truth about 9/11 has been exposed for years.....the tricky part for the US Government is perpetuating the lies; continuously bombarding the public with propaganda and every so often stage a terrorist "incident" like the skid-mark bomber to tighten the ever-increasing "security" of the Facsist Police State, and to justify the continuing wars and occupation of the Middle East.
Not only our country, but the entire WORLD in being taken over by the NWO Banksters who own our whore politicians!!
@lini4545 I guess that's why you are easily duped into conspiracy theories, because the people who say these things sound relatively impressive when they speak, but when you delve deeper, you realise these allegations are unsubstantiated, at least in my opinion
shills = traitors >one who betrays. a person who betrays his country, cause, friends, etc. one guilty of treason or treachery
shouldnt "concerned" americans that are SO involved in 911 truth , have an opinion on the dancing israelis that were arrested and released with no to little publicity on it.
might have something to do with the fact that this reflects the fact that shills care nothing of the united states of america and are only here to cover up isreals involvement in 911
they should have told the demolition experts to make the crumbling of the building look more irregular, but demolition experts are just experts and they only know how to do a perfect job!
How does even the most bootlicking FedGov lover dispute that this was a freefall or near freefall? The entire building fails in the same spots across the entire length of the buildin, at the same exact time. The building almost looks like it's being pulled into a hole below the street, the drop is so smooth.
@LindaSteve First of all your response is an egotistical and ignorant response to a tragedy that killed 343 of NYs Firefighters. Think about the psychological pressures these guys are under to keep their mouths shut. Threats and intimidation and fear for their families and loved ones, fear they may not get the needed medical help by speaking up. But certainly there have been some speaking truth such as Anton Vodvarka, LT FDNY retired, who is on the front page of firefightersfor911truth*org
Tell you what. Go to a NYFD station that was hard hit on 911, and start spouting your theories. See if you get your ass kicked. I'll bet $500 you get carried out on a stretcher!
LOL!
Sorry to tell you...you are an insult to all who died that day.
@LindaBS Oh Linda, your lil conspiracy theory fable about 19 men in a cave is as reasonable as Santa Claus flying around on a sleigh with reindeer, or about as intelligent as the Keebler elves hidden away in a forest baking cookies in trees, or about as believable as a deadly Easter bunny with fangs and claws...my god, you've got the most outlandish CT yet, you should be ashamed how ludicrous it is. Oh and BTW, I have been to fire stations to tell them the truth about 9/11 and they thanked us!
That is an invalid argument, do you assume that all people in the middle east are poor stupid and live in caves? This attack was coordinated by a multimillionaire.
@andrewyaoauatauabaea His family is just the seventh richest family in Saudia Arabia at over $7 billion middleeastinvestors*co*uk/richest_arabs*php...and he himself was a useful patsy... Get your facts straight bubba, before you spout off.
He does not have control over his entire families wealth. He has 52 siblings. Al Qaida, or the CIA as you might believe said he had $300 million, however it is estimated that he only had around $50 million. Either way, he's a millionaire.
@andrewyaoauatauabaea Ok, so you still haven't explained what evidence you have linking Bin Laden to 9/11....Surely if the FBI had evidence they would have indicted him for it....But of course we know they didn't do that, because they even stated they had no hard evidence connecting OBL to 9/11.
He confessed to it, therefore, he is not the real Osama, or Osama did do it.
I cannot prove that this video is of Osama bin Laden, no one can, but consider this:
Now think, it takes months to prepare for a building demolition and up to hundreds of workers.
This means that for a successful demolition to occur the crew would have to re plaster the walls every night after working so employees wouldn't be suspicious and stay shut up after killing thousands.
@andrewyaoauatauabaea He confessed he didn't do it: tinyurl dot com/2eac7gu So what are we to believe, hmmm? The phony fake OBL tapes, which have been proven to be productions of the IntelCenter or do we believe rogue elements of our government in collusion with transnational, corporate interests pulled it off? Did OBL cause Norad to Stand Down? Did OBL cause WTC7 to free-fall into its own footprint? No, of course not.
No, WTC7 was a controlled demolition. There was a chunk of WTC7 missing and there was fear it would fall lopsided, so they evacuated everyone and demolished it. This is a well documented event.
It is a terrible thing to say the tapes have been proven to be fake when there is such controversy about it. There is actually no valid proof that the tapes were fake.
All of the arguments seem to stem from his beard not being dyed and him using the wrong hand because the other was injured.
@andrewyaoauatauabaea Hahahahaha....You just said "it takes months to prepare for a building demolition" and now you are saying it was demolished in a couple hours.....HAHAHAHAHA....You're a fool. I'm done wasting my time with a foolish troll. There is no debate, there is only truth versus lies. Lies of the official conspiracy theory are legion. Just read Debunking 9/11 Debunking by David Ray Griffin. You can't prove a lie, so don't even try....EOT P.S. Tapes are fake: tinyurl*com/3tz943s
@andrewyaoauatauabaea The story about employees would be suspicious, and hundreds of workers and months to prepare the WTC buildings for destruction...Really, it takes hundreds of workers. Wouldn't the cover of being construction crews working in various areas of the building be a pretty good cover? Wouldn't setting up paintable nanothermite be a pretty good cover...All building require painting now and then. And months to prepare...Sure, they had years and years. They could take their time!
@andrewdupe Did I say Nanothermite, or did I say thermite? hmmmm: en*wikipedia*org/wiki/Nano-thermite "Historically, pyrotechnic or explosive applications for traditional thermites have been limited due to their relatively slow energy release rates. But because nanothermites are created from reactant particles with proximities approaching the atomic scale, energy release rates are far improved...'They' are generally developed for military use, propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics" EOT
@clbackus It was an inside job but what can we do? I protested with my cousin in NYC once with like a group of people & nothing happened, your usually told that your stupid, crazy, to shut & good home. Seriously even if you go out & speak its like it makes no difference. They got away with it. In order for this to really come out strong is for a whole nation to be on our side. Not enough people are waking up, when more people wake up, "oh here America, here's a new iPod, now go back to sleep".
A WTC worker and his friend that was stuck in building 7 most of the day due to fire fighter and rescue workers not being able to get to them until later mentioned this.. "We heard various explosion like sounds from within the building that day wondering where they were coming from." After being rescued, he mentioned that at the time of collapse he heard numerous blasts all in a row as it came down. Sadly after that interview, that man "died in an accident" with no found cause officials said
This is funny it's doesn't mean ur not an American if u believe this video. The owner said go ahead and do the demo. When was it's set up for demo before 911 of course it was. Look into it this whole day was set up. Why didnt these planes go down by a fighter jet. When u know that any plane can be reached within 10 minutes to be shot down but none of these planes were shot down. Why???
WTC 7 was 610 feet tall. But yeah, sloppy investigation by NIST. Doubt it was a controlled demo although. You don't pack explosive for a demo, then let them sit in a burning building for nearly 7 hours. You can compromise the entire operation. If they were going to pull it, they would've done it a LOT sooner than 5:20pm EST.
@Rayvyn007 Then why did the owner say "...maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." ?
@MazJax How can you pull out firefighters, when the firefighters had been out of the building already? Contextually, it does not fit either with the rest of Silverstein's sentence. This is really grasping for straws here. Moreover, "Pull it" is a standard phrase for bringing a building down.
Heat steel in a furnace to 800 degrees celsius and you can work it with a hammer, bend it and so on. This is why steel structures are so vulnerable to heat.Sufficiently big pieces of wood,even when burning, keep their shape much longer.
Whenever there is a fire in a steel structure,it bends and breaks down.As is frequently seen in the news.In houses this usually is prevented through lining the steel with asbestos or covering it with concrete.Long lasting fires break this barrier
@wwwtotalitaerde Thats in a furnace where a temperature and pressure can be maintained for extended periods of time. But in this scenario, most of the fuel would burn off in the explosion, which didn't happen in WTC7. No plane hit it, so the jet fuel theory doesn't apply, yet, it fell in under 7 seconds symmetrically. Buildings have burned far longer and than WTC7, and the fires engulfed the entire building and they did NOT collapse.
I don't understand what some of the ignorant people are talking here. Larry already stated clearly they pulled the building. U just need to poke a rusty trident in his aZZ and ask him when did they wired the devices. Immediately after the 2 tall collapsed or few weeks ago? sooo ignorant people die with crappy id-io-ts controlled america if you still doesn't open your iezz.. pathetic still don't believe then.
And now I'm asking myself: Could it be that in view of the republican congress majority president Barak Obama ordered the "clean" killing OP, knowing he is ecaping the hype in the follow up and escaping the three fingers pointing at the government, when Osama was alive to be interrogated, since Bush pointed with one finger on Osama.
I thought the way they tried to mop up 9/11 was bad... now... after disposing of Osama Bin Laden's body and presenting a 2 year old photo-shopped image as proof of his death... I think i have hit the "I've seen everything" barrier.
The world has surely changed... and not for the better either...
You've established free-fall and conclude the building was demolished by explosives. But controlled demolitions are produced by destroying the first floor supports of a building and letting gravity do the rest. All controlled demolitions fall as a function of gravitational energy and the resistance of the building itself. For WTC7 to free fall explosives would have had to have been placed on EVERY floor to reduce the resistance to zero. As the building falls we see the structure remains intact.
@cantopia your thesis is totally FALSE -if only the first floor is wired up and something goes wrong in the timing, the building can fall SIDEWAYS as can be seen here: watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk -the building can in NO WAY accelerate if it is not wired from top to bottom - the resistance of the lower floors cause a de-celleration if not a botched job. so what's your conspiracy theory? that 19 hijackers conspired with boxcutters threw their boxcutters at the building? or others in government? what fits?
@tryithere According to NIST's report here: wtc*nist*gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1A_for_public_comment*pdf they state "The elevation of the top of the parapet wall was +925 ft 4in" Over here they claim wtc*nist*gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A*pdf it was 610 ft tall. Mr. Chandler is using the height as identified in the first NIST report on WTC7. You can clearly hear him say that in the video.
@tryithere close but not there yet .....the new WTC 7 building that was completed in 2006 stands 741 feet tall...the original WTC that came down on September 11th was a 47 story building that stood 610 feet tall.
Wait -- WTC-7 IS 925 FEET TALL??? It's a 47 story building! Ten feet per floor = 470 feet tall. WTC-1 and 2 were 1100 feet tall!!! Are you saying WTC-1 and 2 were just 175 FEET TALLER THAN WTC-7 ?!?
LOL
Man, if the rest of your numbers are as out of whack as this, you need a new calculator.
@themisterskinny You obviously don't pay attention.The height of WTC7, AS REPORTED BY NIST,ok? That's the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the agency who was writing the OFFICIAL report on WTC7 indicated it was 925' in their report. You got that Bubba? That part makes sense so far? Ok, now, Mr. Chandler simply used that number as a baseline from the 683' mark at floor 29. The difference between the two is the calibration height for the calcs. I guess that's too difficult for u?
@clbackus so - for the two to three seconds of freefall the buliding was travelling a certain amount of time with no hindrance - how much of the building or how many feet/meters/floors does the government and nist expect us to believe had magically disappeared due to office fires?
there are too many "coincidences" for this to be a terrorist plot. too many things happened in just the right way for everything to have been coincidental. i hate to use this word, but it would be IMPOSSIBLE for terrorists to pull off anything of this magnitude without direct help from the United States government. I can't imagine the trillions of dollars that were shuffled around between bastard business men at the cost of thousands of lives. its awful.
The issue is that the govt insists that the two planes caused the fall of the towers and even more preposterously claim that WTC7 which was not even hit by any plane also fell on the same day because some fire borne debris from the other two towers hitting it. Those who want to believe in the plane story as the first cause as the schemers want them to in order to divert attention from the real cause are really living in the reality of Alice in wonderland....
The only thing thats really constant here is that two planes few into the world trade center on september 11 2001. I saw it, millions of other people saw it, and all the passengers on those flights certainly saw it. So whats the issue here? Isnt there more important things to be arguing about? If somebody proves that there were no planes and they were demolished, are they going to magically reform and everybody come back to life?
@Danro05 What's the issue here? For Real? We are talking about Building #7, a 47 story high rise, NOT hit by any plane. It was the furthest away from the two towers and yet it completely, obliterated itself at 5:20pm on 9/11. It completely collapses into its own footprint at free-fall speed, and you say you have more important things to argue about? Are you serious? Has this country been so dumbed-down, that it is OK that rogue entities are allowed to plant bombs and get away with it?
@clbackus You think maybe the thousands of gallons of diesel fuel stored in the building might have possibly had something to with it collapsing? Just like the thousands of gallons of jet fuel spewed from the two planes that hit the main towers had everything to do with why they collapsed? For real, why would they push the button to blow up the building 7 hours after the two fell?Wouldnt it make more sense, bc thats what you guys are all about, and least suspicious for them to do it all at once?
@Danro05 You are still going with the theory that a fire-induced collapse can completely demolish a building at free-fall speeds? The facts don't add my friend. Free-Fall is only possible if all the support columns are simultaneously removed such that nothing is resisting the collapsing building's descent into itself. By this fact, you are subscribing to the "Light a Match, Demolish a Building" Easter Bunny theory. And yet, your Hydrocarbon fire theory, still cannot explain away the molten metal
@clbackus theres alot that doesnt make sense with all the theorys. however, the most unbelievable for me is the idea that an inside job conspiracy could remain a secret this entire time. a demo of that magnitude would take weeks and months to coordinate and hundreds of people actively involved. you expect me to believe that whole operation would be able to be hidden throughout this entire ordeal? its more than facts, which for the record are not entirely on your sdie to begin with, its logic
@Danro05 You ever heard of the scientific method...Which theory has the most credibility when applied to 9/11? Go do the critical thinking, and you'll find out whichever official theory you subscribe to, none of them holds water to science. I.e. Molten Steel, Free Fall Collapse, the fact the building was pulverized to a fine pulp and ejected miles away, That within the dust was nanothermitic accelerant explosives....that cellphones didn't work at 34,300 feet....on and on and on...
@clbackus whatever, theres nothing thats going to be said on youtube that will a) change anybodys mind and b) prove anything about anything. thats facts are, there was a conspiracy on 9/11. i choose to believe that the people with all the motivation in the world to kill Americans were the ones who did it. we also caught the masterminds behind it and htey confessed. idk what else you want. you might be able to cut and paste together w.e facts you want but still none of it makes any sense
@Danro05 W/E! W/E?? You seem to rather enjoy disinformation and complete lies, when faced with scientifically verifiable facts. That's called wanton denial. What makes sense, is the official conspiracy theory is a blatant obvious cartoon fiction fairy-tale, and you can sit here in denial all you want, that won't change anything. You first need to believe in reality, you can't choose your own reality. Try, try as you might, the facts are still the facts. It's time to wake up my friend! EOT
@Danro05 Youtube is a big Light-sheding machine to the many people, who otherwise would not have the means upon which to build their opinion. Of course with every communicated fact the question remains to be answered by YOU: Does this sound plausible to me, or does this need further investigation? But it frees you from dependence of authorites !
@Danro05 You're behind on your info. NIST has reported in their latest Q&A that the diesel fuel from the storage tanks in WTC 7 had little to no impact on the collapse of the building. They also state that something like 90% of the fuel has been accounted for. Either way diesel fuel cannot produce free fall in the progressive collapse of a building.
Ha i think the reason they stuck with controlled demolition instead of destroying everything the buildings could cover was cause they didnt have multimillion dollar leases on every other buildings except for the world trade center complex.
Get agents scully and mulder on it, it was the aliens that shot jfk and invented the freemasons which control our minds and set up the explosives on building 7 so that no one would know. George bush went back in a time machine and invented the CIA to create the lies that we see today, DON'T BELIEVE THEM THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE!!!
the difference bw "truthers" and the government/official 911 report is that the "truthers" provide evidence to support their claims, while the government just expects u to believe whatever is on the official report w/o providing evidences.
@campodutylagops Correct. AND the Commission of the "Official Report" has members who also feel the report is flawed. A 'non-official' investigation should be conducted. It may seem unpatriotic to some, but I'd rather find the truth through facts and clean out this mess, than let there be 'another' 911 - or a Middle East/N. Africa movement.
I love how the perpetrators of this conspiracy are willing to kill thousands of people within the towers and on the planes but apparently still take the time execute a perfect controlled demolition.
The presence of thermite in building 1 & 2 is easily explainable as a reaction with the aluminium on the hull of the plane and iron oxide on the support pillars (presence of thermite supported by journal articles). If some one could show me evidence of some journal articles that shows that thermite was significantly present in building 7 it would be conclusive of demolition since there would be no explanation possible of how that reaction could occur unless it was placed.
The WTC buildings were literally surrounded by thousands of people at all times for months after the attacks. Do you really think that 100% of all those people would have missed a controlled demolition? You can't just sneak into a building, set up all your charges, and push the fire button without anyone noticing. It is just absurd to think that they could secretly pull this building down in the midst of downtown Manhattan during those first historic weeks after the attacks.
@bertdanger I'm sorry, but you are sorely mistaken on what you are talking about. The building was demolished at 5:20pm on 9/11, it was not weeks after the attacks, it was on the DAY of the attack. That means the set-up happened pre/9-11.In relation to the CD set-up, don't forget about the technologies available at the time, and the capabilities. Things like remote detonation devices for CD charges, things like paint-able nano-thermite, etc. All patented and in the case of RD devices, commercial
@clbackus nano thermite? really? only recently has anyone even managed to make a nanotube...and now you say we have incendiary at 1/1000th of an inch?
@Wrathruler I'm not aware of nanothermite being commercial, but I didn't say that did I? I said remote-controlled demolition transmitters and receivers are commercially available. As far as nanothermite, yes, the military and government does have these advanced energetic nanocomposites. Los Alamos, the Naval Surface Warfare Center, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have all produced ultra fine grain (UFG) aluminum powders, a key component of most nano-thermitic materials.
@clbackus yes..you are saying people are grinding aluminum and other ingredients to 1/1000th of an inch..do you comprehend how fine that is? i don't think even HEPA filters could catch that fine a grain.
@Wrathruler Yes, I do comprehend how fine that is. The technologies governments and the military-industrial complex have developed and perfected is beyond comprehension in many respects...So, to say it is improbable or impossible to do is only conjecture.
@clbackus I'm afraid sir you are very much mistaken on your last point. The cutter charges and remote detonators according the correction and back-pedalling on AE for 9/11 truth debunks your comments. I've read the correction and it is basically saying the the cutter charges and remote detonators well they are not sure they exist. Tim Sullivan sold a turkey by saying the remote detonators exist because they appear in movies!!! In fact I'll quote the correction for you.
@hornetgags You trolls are annoying, but must be dealt with. You are full of BS on this comment. I just read the AE911truth article you posted this from. No where does it say remote detonators or cutter charges do NOT exist. In fact, the article shows an example of one, and here is another: freepatentsonline*com/y2006/0266204*html They are talking about one specific device and not calling it a cutter charge. A far cry from your claim they don't exist. You trolls amaze me with your delusion.
@bertdanger Well shame on our engineers that build such a crappy buildings that fall down so quickly because of fire. Shame on our government in which they didn't pass a law regulating a tougher laws on building code. I would hire engineers from Africa and other third world countries to approve our standards.
May those engineers burn in Hell if they have designed a building that fall down because of a stove and half piece of paper on fire. Oh no.. i light my cigarette.. house falling
What to me would constitute something of a better proof for people who question would be another video with a source of sound other than the sound of the building collapse(say music from a visible source or people talking). The video could be distorted, edited for any purpose. I don't think to be the case, however video with audio that is much harder to change the tempo of because it would carry with it obvious flaws(music that is at too fast a tempo for instance), and if verified...
spiritmong Wow, you can do stats (whop-de-do). Taking into evidence the owner of the building, his statement to the press, and his insurance settlement that is three of three for motive, opportunity and intent. It is clear that the building should a) not have come down in its entirety b) all at once c) how thermite was in there then you are just another statistic that has clue. Start with the facts (aka evidence) not the stats. Stats can be make to lie in anyones favor.
Oh my God. I cannot ignore your compelling presentation. Thank you clbackus. NOW WHAT? If 9/11 was orchestrated somehow by our government, what in God's name do we do?
Wake more people up. The NWO needs us to police ourselves.
Just think about it.
How many cops would pull you over for speeding or something that is not even a crime, if they were aware that it was actually illegal and that they are working for the NWO?
Store some food and supplies. Vote in local elections. Warn other people. That is all you can do, and it is all we need.
You want the truth? Flight 93 was supposed to hit bldg 7 to provide the ignorant some plausability of a buildings destruction where otherwise none could exist.
View the shots of white hot metal pouring out of the bldgs before collapse. You cannot get 4000 degree white hot molten metal with a 1000 degree fuel fire. It can ONLY be thermite/thermate. Molten metal Incancesense cant be faked and is irrefutable proof.
The US Bureau of Labour Statistics lists 1.6 million employed engineers in the US, 30% of which work in architecual and related engineering. So that is approx 480 thousand. Now if 1300 architects and engineers believe it was a controlled demolition that represents 1300 out of 480 thousand, which equals 0.2708333%
Therefore only approx 0.271% of architects and engineers in the USA believe it was a controlled demolition. And that is just the USA. Extrapolate that to the whole world!!!
@spiritmong Your statistics couldn't be more flawed. What percentage of the 480k number have ever even heard of WTC7 even? And of the ones that have heard of it, how many of them have heard of AE911truth? Now, of the ones who have heard of both, and have questions, how many of those have stepped up to the plate and have gone through the process of signing the petition? Of the ones that have, how many of those are in the backlog of the verification process at AE911truth? Come on man, get a life!
You have raised some good points, which is refreshing for a conspiracy nut, and I admit that there is some flaw (I'm not afraid of scrutinizing my findings unlike conspiracy theorists)
However, even if a large percentage of 480k had heard of building 7 wouldn't that automatically mean they would agree with the controlled demolition theory. Maybe they would, maybe not.
Also, if 1300 or 1400 hundred architects and engineers believe it then surely word would of spread around the community.
@spiritmong That's why I said, have questions. But hearing of something, and actually looking into, researching and doing the most basic of physics equations is another altogether. I would trust that most critical thinking architects and engineers who did their HW would come to the conclusion that a free-fall collapsing building into the path of greatest resistance is impossible from fires alone. Just think about the energy it takes to convert all of that GPE into KE.
@spiritmong ....and not slow down at all. The building structure just "gets out of the way for the falling structure above it, without providing any resistive capability?" Bullshit. Absolutely Bullshit...No, the engineers who are presented it properly, so they can see the facts, they get it, they understand. The ones who hear from their Cousin Vinny on the street, who knows nothing about Science and Engineering, are just going to blow it off without giving the thought any credence whatsoever.
@clbackus Good. Also would like to add that these are 1300 professionals with careers and probably families STICKING THEIR NECKS OUT, saying "the government is lying". Not surprised only .02 whatever percent came forward.
@spiritmong A lot of people are afraid of saying anything.. so many people have been fired for speaking out. Many people are also not able to because of the psychology involved.
@spiritmong funny how you say conspiracy NUT.. which essentially states you believe him(forgot theorist). aand its the falsers that definetly have more trouble arguing/debating this topic. They for the most part don't even consider it debate making their opinion baised. Most truthers are just wanting a further investigation, because their are clear disrepenancies in the NIST and FEMA reports, not just that but things like the cleveland airport mystery, and the lack of debris at the pentagon.
Also, as far as I know, there isn't any national or international recognized enginerring body who have joined, or support the controlled demolition hypothesis.
Maybe AE9/11 should reach out to such groups and ask for their opinion.
AE911 have been on mainstream news channels that are watched by millions so they certainly have good marketing.
Finally, everybody has seen the collapses on TV, including architects or engineers. If they were doubtful they would of looked into it and found AE911
"Let us never tolerate the outrageous 9/11 Fairy tale - malicious lies, deception and fraud. A criminal effort to shift the blame away from those who committed treason. Traitors label of the search for the truth a conspiracy, which effectively muzzles the Constitutional Right of Freedom of Speech allowing the Bush Administration/CIA/Traitors to shift the blame away from themselves, away from the guilty." - We The People
waketheoblivious 1 month ago
This is very intelligent and very well put. Thank you.
andrewada 1 month ago
thank you controlled opposition
silvernail6 1 month ago
More conspiracy lies.
TheNYLibertarian 2 months ago
@TheNYLibertarian: Nothing conspiratorial or theoretical about the rate and manner in which wtc 7 came down. Not to mention the explosive destruction of the Twin Towers...the 100 day fires, molten *metal shown in the fema bpat appdx. C, the iron microspheres, the squibs, the pulverized concrete, 1100 missing human beings, or the hi-tech thermitic explosives found in the dust. The evidence is so broad and well documented the conclusion that they were demolished with explosives is irrefutable.
winston2015 2 months ago 5
@winston2015 well put.
zenoist2 1 month ago
@TheNYLibertarian
Why dont u do ur math? go MEASURE the acceleration frame by frame for yourself. Then come back. else your opinion is meaningless, null & void- just hot air blown out of an ass
swu880 2 months ago
/watch?v=QilSHm0Luj4
TheHungrySnail 2 months ago
The government didn't like JFK. When he was killed the FBI didn't investigate the killing. A president is killed and they said there was a magic bullet. Obviously there was more to the story and they may have even done it themselves. If a normal person is killed they do better investigations than that. JFK's head went backward which means he was shot from the front. They said Oswald was behind in the 6th floor of the building would be impossible to make that shot. We were lied to.
TheChineseEmpire 2 months ago
I thank you for your work. Real scientific analysis is needed to bring some actual attention to the matter. All too often, people conclude one way or another about 9/11 before hearing any of the evidence, and the argument becomes a contest of how many mistakes one side can point out about the other, or which side of the argument has the most "crazies", and the hard science gets ignored or bypassed. I am someone who sees a need for investigation, not a "theorist". We need facts, not theories.
AdamRainStopper 2 months ago
all four corners of the building weakened perfectly at the same time..
KungFriedChicken 3 months ago 2
@ctcole77 Hey shill, at least try to stay on topic here. This is about the free-fall of WTC 7. I'm tired of you disinfo shills.
Kill0Your0TV 3 months ago 2
This video should have alot more than 100K views....all I want is those who believe the official story to address this analysis. What can you argue with?
TheKmagz 3 months ago
Occupy Wall Street
MrKemskee 3 months ago
There's no statute of limitation on mass murder. Round up the suspects.
ChilesGreen 4 months ago
100% INSIDE JOBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
thins112 4 months ago
Science. That is what tells someone who believes in numbers and facts that 911 was an inside job. Brilliant work! Pythagoras was right. Numbers don't lie, people do.
Daddyo930 4 months ago 8
You WILL NOT hear intelligent discussions on bldg 7 from our "free press". The only free press in the USA are independent news sources which very few people are aware of. Amy Goodman on Free Speech TV is among the most widely recognized. Most "news" in the mainstream media consists of things like verbatim, unquestioned copies of press releases from the CIA.
I'm so sad for families which have a son killed in Iraq and they think he somehow died for their "free press".
HVYMETL 4 months ago 2
7 world trade center was in fact demolished , good to see logic on utube rather then propaganda from government idiots trying to take attention away from the truth
surfingcali69 4 months ago 2
Even when the evidence is shown clearly and scientifically and the Corrupt Government body NIST is compelled to admit freefall, there will be those stamping their feet and crying - "I don't believe it, I won't believe it no no no boo hoo hoo, it can't be true, there must be a Father Christmas my daddy told me and he would never lie to me". Head in the sand & bum in the air brigade.
Mr4thetruth 4 months ago 4
Excellent! Thank you!
tmw713 4 months ago
Thank you.
Miketronic808 4 months ago
This is bullshit.
Illumirage 4 months ago
@Illumirage why? It makes perfect sense
robinart366 4 months ago
WE HAVE THE VIDEO OF WTC7 BEING DEMOLISHED. THE VIDEO SHOWS THE EXPLOSIONS AND IT HAS THE AUDIO. ...ARREST LARRY SILVERSTEIN, NOW!!!
SEARCH: "!MUST WATCH NOW! Visible Explosions !NEW VIDEO! SEPT 2011 WTC Building 7 Controlled Demolition"
Born2Flesh 4 months ago
The building wasn't damaged by the towers. This was imploded. And your work is excellent to show us that it was imploded! Free fall could only happen if the roof started falling without floors beneath! For those of that passed 5th grade..we can understand this! Thanks so much!!
Tribulatoryfighter 4 months ago
All my comments on mainstream media about 9/11 inside job, and other people's ones have been all removed.. funny huh? Open the website of murdered Danny Jowenko who's interview is here on Youtube... his last name and then dot com. The intro will show how building 7 was done.
barthoedemaker 4 months ago
Nice vid, but pushing a stick in to the hornets nest is just going to upset the wasps ...I would love to be optimistic but the gov is still sticking to the official story about JFK all these years later...i just can not see the cops rocking up to mr Bush's house with a warrant do ya know what i mean....
shakeexon 4 months ago
/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o /watch?v=5qFsjdymqSk /watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k /watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA /watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI /watch?v=WxqoChniKVU /watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4 /watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY /watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE /watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w /watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ /watch?v=wKuLUu7SQU4 /watch?v=dVutUGDiQN0
megamogx 4 months ago in playlist More videos from clbackus
@clbackus the greatest three words evaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar! "so deadly serious! "
ALLMAPEOPLE 4 months ago
has anyone ever thought that perhaps the terrorists put explosives in the towers? :P
I've never seen anyone else who's speculated that.
RawfullMyEggroll 4 months ago
@RawfullMyEggroll Yes. Whoever put explosives in the buildings are terrorists. i think its very telling that 'terrorist' by your (even unconscious) definition must exclude American establishmentarians... or Israelis, or any others except Muslim extremists. The media has done a fine job of indoctrinating the gullible American public to equate Arabs with 'terrorists'.
immayhem 4 months ago 2
If they loaded the building full of explosives to bring it down wouldn't everyone anywhere near the building have heard the explosion? Just asking
orping 4 months ago
larry silverstein (80 y.o grandpa) : heee...heee..heee didn't I say " pull it "
mayaforpeaceful 4 months ago
I wonder if Bush is going to the 10th anniversary of 911 in NY. It happened on his watch. I wonder if he would stand there with all the people who feel its an inside job. Would he ever break the skull & bones code of silence and tell the American people what really happened or go to the grave knowing the secret???
fccwatch 4 months ago
When debunkers keep losing arguments and overlooking the facts it makes you wonder who these people really are. They try to use ridicule as their first step in order to scare off the newcomers. Name calling and harassment is better than having scientific arguments where they always lose. Do your research, but only look at facts and don´t get distracted by anything that suggests it could´ve been something else than what the evidence points to. No gigantic lasers or crazy martians. Just facts.
FreeMason34 5 months ago
false flag operation.
MOXWELLDIAMOND 5 months ago
9/11/2011 - Ten Years, No Justice
/watch?v=FxPaebHe3fw
911debunkerschannel 5 months ago
Thumbs up for the Scientists that FOUND the EXPLOSIVES in the Dust: Neils H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R Larsen, THANK YOU for finding the TRUTH!
1nephi13v37 5 months ago
now are we still sheeple or are we gonna take back our beautiful world that god gave us from those ancient serpents
jallisah14 6 months ago 2
@jallisah14 According to the Sumerian tablets, the ancient serpents were the gods that created us, in their own image. Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction.
Daddyo930 5 months ago
I don't like praying, especially in front of people. September 12th 2001 I stood out front of my highschool with hundreds of classmates, held hands and we prayed for the victims of 9-11. I'll be god-damned if I dont find the most honest explanation as to why thousands of fellow americans were carelessly murdered. It's our job as compassionate humans to find out the truth. And if any of us knew the truth we wouldn't be arguing about this incident 11 years after the fact. Lets get it together.
3n50ph 6 months ago
Cover-up....period... May the ones that are potentially involved in this mass murder burn in hell for eternity... My heart goes out to all those lives that were lost..My prayers are going out to thier families....
disposablefreedom 6 months ago
The truth about 9/11 has been exposed for years.....the tricky part for the US Government is perpetuating the lies; continuously bombarding the public with propaganda and every so often stage a terrorist "incident" like the skid-mark bomber to tighten the ever-increasing "security" of the Facsist Police State, and to justify the continuing wars and occupation of the Middle East.
Not only our country, but the entire WORLD in being taken over by the NWO Banksters who own our whore politicians!!
apatriotofusa 6 months ago 16
@lini4545 I guess that's why you are easily duped into conspiracy theories, because the people who say these things sound relatively impressive when they speak, but when you delve deeper, you realise these allegations are unsubstantiated, at least in my opinion
TheGamanic 6 months ago
@TheGamanic Ok... good analysis ...coming from someone who has a youtube channel full of video game recordings...ok ....
geminimc69 4 months ago
watch?v=nJ6_WBwgNuM
bernuga 6 months ago
shills = traitors >one who betrays. a person who betrays his country, cause, friends, etc. one guilty of treason or treachery
shouldnt "concerned" americans that are SO involved in 911 truth , have an opinion on the dancing israelis that were arrested and released with no to little publicity on it.
might have something to do with the fact that this reflects the fact that shills care nothing of the united states of america and are only here to cover up isreals involvement in 911
pederman15 6 months ago 3
they should have told the demolition experts to make the crumbling of the building look more irregular, but demolition experts are just experts and they only know how to do a perfect job!
juujuubie 7 months ago
@juujuubie They demolition experts are professionals dude. They have an image to protect. They cant be connected to a sloppy demolition you know?
GiantPoopingMonkey 6 months ago
How does even the most bootlicking FedGov lover dispute that this was a freefall or near freefall? The entire building fails in the same spots across the entire length of the buildin, at the same exact time. The building almost looks like it's being pulled into a hole below the street, the drop is so smooth.
peterp21 7 months ago
Richard Gage (AE911Truth) Talk @ Cambridge University
UK 18th June 2011 (ALL WELCOME)
See the featured video on my channel for full details.
cappucinokid100 7 months ago
In the last 10 years, has there EVER been a Senior NYFD Official who has stated that he or she believed the CD CT?
Any Chief, Division Chief, Battalion Chief, a Captain or LT who was there on that day...retired or active? ANYBODY? Any NYFD Investigator?
If there are none...why is that????????
If random YT viewers can see all the CD, why can't a Pro?
That is a Paradox that must be explained...NO?
LindaStevensBZ 7 months ago
@LindaSteve First of all your response is an egotistical and ignorant response to a tragedy that killed 343 of NYs Firefighters. Think about the psychological pressures these guys are under to keep their mouths shut. Threats and intimidation and fear for their families and loved ones, fear they may not get the needed medical help by speaking up. But certainly there have been some speaking truth such as Anton Vodvarka, LT FDNY retired, who is on the front page of firefightersfor911truth*org
clbackus 7 months ago
@clbackus
Tell you what. Go to a NYFD station that was hard hit on 911, and start spouting your theories. See if you get your ass kicked. I'll bet $500 you get carried out on a stretcher!
LOL!
Sorry to tell you...you are an insult to all who died that day.
LindaStevensBZ 7 months ago
@LindaBS Oh Linda, your lil conspiracy theory fable about 19 men in a cave is as reasonable as Santa Claus flying around on a sleigh with reindeer, or about as intelligent as the Keebler elves hidden away in a forest baking cookies in trees, or about as believable as a deadly Easter bunny with fangs and claws...my god, you've got the most outlandish CT yet, you should be ashamed how ludicrous it is. Oh and BTW, I have been to fire stations to tell them the truth about 9/11 and they thanked us!
clbackus 7 months ago
@clbackus
That is an invalid argument, do you assume that all people in the middle east are poor stupid and live in caves? This attack was coordinated by a multimillionaire.
andrewyaoauatauabaea 7 months ago
@andrewyaoauatauabaea Hahahaha. Sure, which multi-millionare though? Or rather which multi-billionaires'?
clbackus 7 months ago
@clbackus
Osama Bin Laden is not a multi-billionaire.
andrewyaoauatauabaea 7 months ago
@andrewyaoauatauabaea His family is just the seventh richest family in Saudia Arabia at over $7 billion middleeastinvestors*co*uk/richest_arabs*php...and he himself was a useful patsy... Get your facts straight bubba, before you spout off.
clbackus 7 months ago
@clbackus
He does not have control over his entire families wealth. He has 52 siblings. Al Qaida, or the CIA as you might believe said he had $300 million, however it is estimated that he only had around $50 million. Either way, he's a millionaire.
andrewyaoauatauabaea 7 months ago
@andrewyaoauatauabaea Ok, so you still haven't explained what evidence you have linking Bin Laden to 9/11....Surely if the FBI had evidence they would have indicted him for it....But of course we know they didn't do that, because they even stated they had no hard evidence connecting OBL to 9/11.
clbackus 7 months ago
@clbackus
He confessed to it, therefore, he is not the real Osama, or Osama did do it.
I cannot prove that this video is of Osama bin Laden, no one can, but consider this:
Now think, it takes months to prepare for a building demolition and up to hundreds of workers.
This means that for a successful demolition to occur the crew would have to re plaster the walls every night after working so employees wouldn't be suspicious and stay shut up after killing thousands.
Also: watch?v=1uxlrcQL5Dk
andrewyaoauatauabaea 7 months ago
@andrewyaoauatauabaea He confessed he didn't do it: tinyurl dot com/2eac7gu So what are we to believe, hmmm? The phony fake OBL tapes, which have been proven to be productions of the IntelCenter or do we believe rogue elements of our government in collusion with transnational, corporate interests pulled it off? Did OBL cause Norad to Stand Down? Did OBL cause WTC7 to free-fall into its own footprint? No, of course not.
clbackus 7 months ago
@clbackus
No, WTC7 was a controlled demolition. There was a chunk of WTC7 missing and there was fear it would fall lopsided, so they evacuated everyone and demolished it. This is a well documented event.
It is a terrible thing to say the tapes have been proven to be fake when there is such controversy about it. There is actually no valid proof that the tapes were fake.
All of the arguments seem to stem from his beard not being dyed and him using the wrong hand because the other was injured.
andrewyaoauatauabaea 7 months ago
@andrewyaoauatauabaea Hahahahaha....You just said "it takes months to prepare for a building demolition" and now you are saying it was demolished in a couple hours.....HAHAHAHAHA....You're a fool. I'm done wasting my time with a foolish troll. There is no debate, there is only truth versus lies. Lies of the official conspiracy theory are legion. Just read Debunking 9/11 Debunking by David Ray Griffin. You can't prove a lie, so don't even try....EOT P.S. Tapes are fake: tinyurl*com/3tz943s
clbackus 7 months ago
@andrewyaoauatauabaea The story about employees would be suspicious, and hundreds of workers and months to prepare the WTC buildings for destruction...Really, it takes hundreds of workers. Wouldn't the cover of being construction crews working in various areas of the building be a pretty good cover? Wouldn't setting up paintable nanothermite be a pretty good cover...All building require painting now and then. And months to prepare...Sure, they had years and years. They could take their time!
clbackus 7 months ago
@clbackus
I enjoy debating you, you seem very reasonable.
Thermite would not do the job. Thermite is not an explosive, it does however create areas of very high temperature for a small amount of time.
Painting it on would not allow it to cut through steel.
Also note that this conspiracy would require levels of competence that has never been seen in any administration.
andrewyaoauatauabaea 7 months ago
@andrewdupe Did I say Nanothermite, or did I say thermite? hmmmm: en*wikipedia*org/wiki/Nano-thermite "Historically, pyrotechnic or explosive applications for traditional thermites have been limited due to their relatively slow energy release rates. But because nanothermites are created from reactant particles with proximities approaching the atomic scale, energy release rates are far improved...'They' are generally developed for military use, propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics" EOT
clbackus 7 months ago
@clbackus It was an inside job but what can we do? I protested with my cousin in NYC once with like a group of people & nothing happened, your usually told that your stupid, crazy, to shut & good home. Seriously even if you go out & speak its like it makes no difference. They got away with it. In order for this to really come out strong is for a whole nation to be on our side. Not enough people are waking up, when more people wake up, "oh here America, here's a new iPod, now go back to sleep".
Eminemflocka 7 months ago 2
@Eminemflocka That is exactly how the (Powers That Be) want you to think and act, This type of comment only helps their agenda
geminimc69 4 months ago
@LindaStevensBZ "Condemnation without Investigation is the highest form of ignorance" --- Albert Einstein
clbackus 7 months ago
@LindaStevensBZ oh Linda.. remember the government/North American Union/NWO loves you, now go back to sleep little sheepie, thats a good girl
geminimc69 4 months ago
A WTC worker and his friend that was stuck in building 7 most of the day due to fire fighter and rescue workers not being able to get to them until later mentioned this.. "We heard various explosion like sounds from within the building that day wondering where they were coming from." After being rescued, he mentioned that at the time of collapse he heard numerous blasts all in a row as it came down. Sadly after that interview, that man "died in an accident" with no found cause officials said
ViperSRTnACR 7 months ago
This is funny it's doesn't mean ur not an American if u believe this video. The owner said go ahead and do the demo. When was it's set up for demo before 911 of course it was. Look into it this whole day was set up. Why didnt these planes go down by a fighter jet. When u know that any plane can be reached within 10 minutes to be shot down but none of these planes were shot down. Why???
ediot6969 8 months ago
WTC 7 was 610 feet tall. But yeah, sloppy investigation by NIST. Doubt it was a controlled demo although. You don't pack explosive for a demo, then let them sit in a burning building for nearly 7 hours. You can compromise the entire operation. If they were going to pull it, they would've done it a LOT sooner than 5:20pm EST.
NowKillYourself 8 months ago
I see more conspiracy bull. WTC 7 was not a controlled demolition.
Rayvyn007 8 months ago
@Rayvyn007 Then why did the owner say "...maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." ?
PenguinzRuleTheWorld 8 months ago
@PenguinzRuleTheWorld "Pull out" the firefighters...not the building. That's what Silverstien meant
MazJax 7 months ago
@MazJax How can you pull out firefighters, when the firefighters had been out of the building already? Contextually, it does not fit either with the rest of Silverstein's sentence. This is really grasping for straws here. Moreover, "Pull it" is a standard phrase for bringing a building down.
clbackus 7 months ago
@Rayvyn007 Then PLEASE explain to me how it collapsed. Acually, find anyone who can.
MikeM00se 8 months ago
@MikeM00se Easy.
Heat steel in a furnace to 800 degrees celsius and you can work it with a hammer, bend it and so on. This is why steel structures are so vulnerable to heat.Sufficiently big pieces of wood,even when burning, keep their shape much longer.
Whenever there is a fire in a steel structure,it bends and breaks down.As is frequently seen in the news.In houses this usually is prevented through lining the steel with asbestos or covering it with concrete.Long lasting fires break this barrier
wwwtotalitaerde 8 months ago
@wwwtotalitaerde Thats in a furnace where a temperature and pressure can be maintained for extended periods of time. But in this scenario, most of the fuel would burn off in the explosion, which didn't happen in WTC7. No plane hit it, so the jet fuel theory doesn't apply, yet, it fell in under 7 seconds symmetrically. Buildings have burned far longer and than WTC7, and the fires engulfed the entire building and they did NOT collapse.
74mackd 7 months ago
Why does the dog wag its tail? Because the dog is smarter than the tail. If the tail were smarter, it would wag the dog.
Pharnabaze 8 months ago
WAKE UP AMERICA! The media helped cover up what really HAPPENED!! 9/11 was an inside job!
lueker31 8 months ago
I don't understand what some of the ignorant people are talking here. Larry already stated clearly they pulled the building. U just need to poke a rusty trident in his aZZ and ask him when did they wired the devices. Immediately after the 2 tall collapsed or few weeks ago? sooo ignorant people die with crappy id-io-ts controlled america if you still doesn't open your iezz.. pathetic still don't believe then.
remotgost 8 months ago
oh stfu, no building falls like that from a fire.
donisthabomb1 8 months ago
@donisthabomb1
your right, they fall from fire and the impact damage.
mancltymagics1 8 months ago
Mixing metric and USCS measurement: How can we follow this?
Jackthesmilingblack 8 months ago
Keep doing what you do Sir! THANK YOU FOR THIS VIDEO AND A&E FOR 9/11 TRUTH.
ArtSemiotastic 8 months ago
And now I'm asking myself: Could it be that in view of the republican congress majority president Barak Obama ordered the "clean" killing OP, knowing he is ecaping the hype in the follow up and escaping the three fingers pointing at the government, when Osama was alive to be interrogated, since Bush pointed with one finger on Osama.
Littlewhitelephant 8 months ago
I thought the way they tried to mop up 9/11 was bad... now... after disposing of Osama Bin Laden's body and presenting a 2 year old photo-shopped image as proof of his death... I think i have hit the "I've seen everything" barrier.
The world has surely changed... and not for the better either...
Aerensiniac 8 months ago 2
Perhaps an aeroplane was meant to hit no. 7 first?
rainbowsalads 9 months ago
Height at the roof of each building.
1 WTC: 1,368 ft (417.0 m)
2 WTC: 1,362 ft (415.0 m)
7 WTC: 610 ft (186.0 m)
btw he was going by the height of the building indicated by the NIST report.
dynastoned 9 months ago
You've established free-fall and conclude the building was demolished by explosives. But controlled demolitions are produced by destroying the first floor supports of a building and letting gravity do the rest. All controlled demolitions fall as a function of gravitational energy and the resistance of the building itself. For WTC7 to free fall explosives would have had to have been placed on EVERY floor to reduce the resistance to zero. As the building falls we see the structure remains intact.
cantopia 9 months ago
@cantopia
"As the building falls we see the structure remains intact."
And where did you get that from?
Aerensiniac 8 months ago
@cantopia your thesis is totally FALSE -if only the first floor is wired up and something goes wrong in the timing, the building can fall SIDEWAYS as can be seen here: watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk -the building can in NO WAY accelerate if it is not wired from top to bottom - the resistance of the lower floors cause a de-celleration if not a botched job. so what's your conspiracy theory? that 19 hijackers conspired with boxcutters threw their boxcutters at the building? or others in government? what fits?
abz2000123 8 months ago
bottom line is goverment is lying.... WHAT DO WE DO NEXT?
qortin 9 months ago 3
@qortin TELL YOUR FAMILY! spread awareness! and then DEMAND your local media to cover it! (peacefully protest at their door!)
Jaffsickle 9 months ago 2
@qortin try to find the main problem, and a solution ~ thevenusproject(.)com
xxwaldi 8 months ago
WTC 7 was only 741 feet high not 925 feet.
tryithere 9 months ago
@tryithere According to NIST's report here: wtc*nist*gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1A_for_public_comment*pdf they state "The elevation of the top of the parapet wall was +925 ft 4in" Over here they claim wtc*nist*gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A*pdf it was 610 ft tall. Mr. Chandler is using the height as identified in the first NIST report on WTC7. You can clearly hear him say that in the video.
clbackus 9 months ago 8
@tryithere close but not there yet .....the new WTC 7 building that was completed in 2006 stands 741 feet tall...the original WTC that came down on September 11th was a 47 story building that stood 610 feet tall.
kfeder76 8 months ago
Wait -- WTC-7 IS 925 FEET TALL??? It's a 47 story building! Ten feet per floor = 470 feet tall. WTC-1 and 2 were 1100 feet tall!!! Are you saying WTC-1 and 2 were just 175 FEET TALLER THAN WTC-7 ?!?
LOL
Man, if the rest of your numbers are as out of whack as this, you need a new calculator.
themisterskinny 9 months ago
@themisterskinny You obviously don't pay attention.The height of WTC7, AS REPORTED BY NIST,ok? That's the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the agency who was writing the OFFICIAL report on WTC7 indicated it was 925' in their report. You got that Bubba? That part makes sense so far? Ok, now, Mr. Chandler simply used that number as a baseline from the 683' mark at floor 29. The difference between the two is the calibration height for the calcs. I guess that's too difficult for u?
clbackus 9 months ago 17
@clbackus so - for the two to three seconds of freefall the buliding was travelling a certain amount of time with no hindrance - how much of the building or how many feet/meters/floors does the government and nist expect us to believe had magically disappeared due to office fires?
please respond,
thanks in advance,
abz
abz2000123 8 months ago
@clbackus dont listen to all the CIA goons here ...keep doing what you are doing...
killuminati1871 7 months ago 2
@clbackus
dear lord thank you
toknowandgrow 4 months ago
@themisterskinny wow did you watch the video idiot?
simonk512 8 months ago
this is way over my head
tzDub92 9 months ago
Wouldn't this basically hold true to the collapse of WTC 1 & 2 concerning "free fall"?
damunson3 9 months ago
@damunson3 Absolutely.
clbackus 9 months ago
48 people failed high school physics.
djtripnosys 9 months ago 3
@djtripnosys
or 48 people working like trolls to hide out the truth :)
MultiHomoErectus 9 months ago
there are too many "coincidences" for this to be a terrorist plot. too many things happened in just the right way for everything to have been coincidental. i hate to use this word, but it would be IMPOSSIBLE for terrorists to pull off anything of this magnitude without direct help from the United States government. I can't imagine the trillions of dollars that were shuffled around between bastard business men at the cost of thousands of lives. its awful.
StevenMagdaleno 9 months ago
how stupid would you have to be, to believe that fires in the building brought it down?
17soulable 9 months ago
@ihaveleg
The issue is that the govt insists that the two planes caused the fall of the towers and even more preposterously claim that WTC7 which was not even hit by any plane also fell on the same day because some fire borne debris from the other two towers hitting it. Those who want to believe in the plane story as the first cause as the schemers want them to in order to divert attention from the real cause are really living in the reality of Alice in wonderland....
greatwerewolf007 9 months ago
thanks for the video man. if people dont see this it only means they arent looking - could you add 'proof' to the title? might help with hits!
I'm curious have you ever had exercises with your students involving the same statistics of the collapse of WTC7?
Have you ever discussed this topic with fellow teaches, if so did they think you were crazy?
Again, thanks for the info!
mgiraudjr 9 months ago
50% of youtube comments are trolls
50% of youtube comments are people getting trolled
ihaveleg 9 months ago 2
The only thing thats really constant here is that two planes few into the world trade center on september 11 2001. I saw it, millions of other people saw it, and all the passengers on those flights certainly saw it. So whats the issue here? Isnt there more important things to be arguing about? If somebody proves that there were no planes and they were demolished, are they going to magically reform and everybody come back to life?
Danro05 9 months ago
@Danro05 What's the issue here? For Real? We are talking about Building #7, a 47 story high rise, NOT hit by any plane. It was the furthest away from the two towers and yet it completely, obliterated itself at 5:20pm on 9/11. It completely collapses into its own footprint at free-fall speed, and you say you have more important things to argue about? Are you serious? Has this country been so dumbed-down, that it is OK that rogue entities are allowed to plant bombs and get away with it?
clbackus 9 months ago
@clbackus You think maybe the thousands of gallons of diesel fuel stored in the building might have possibly had something to with it collapsing? Just like the thousands of gallons of jet fuel spewed from the two planes that hit the main towers had everything to do with why they collapsed? For real, why would they push the button to blow up the building 7 hours after the two fell?Wouldnt it make more sense, bc thats what you guys are all about, and least suspicious for them to do it all at once?
Danro05 9 months ago
@Danro05 You are still going with the theory that a fire-induced collapse can completely demolish a building at free-fall speeds? The facts don't add my friend. Free-Fall is only possible if all the support columns are simultaneously removed such that nothing is resisting the collapsing building's descent into itself. By this fact, you are subscribing to the "Light a Match, Demolish a Building" Easter Bunny theory. And yet, your Hydrocarbon fire theory, still cannot explain away the molten metal
clbackus 9 months ago
@clbackus theres alot that doesnt make sense with all the theorys. however, the most unbelievable for me is the idea that an inside job conspiracy could remain a secret this entire time. a demo of that magnitude would take weeks and months to coordinate and hundreds of people actively involved. you expect me to believe that whole operation would be able to be hidden throughout this entire ordeal? its more than facts, which for the record are not entirely on your sdie to begin with, its logic
Danro05 9 months ago
@Danro05 You ever heard of the scientific method...Which theory has the most credibility when applied to 9/11? Go do the critical thinking, and you'll find out whichever official theory you subscribe to, none of them holds water to science. I.e. Molten Steel, Free Fall Collapse, the fact the building was pulverized to a fine pulp and ejected miles away, That within the dust was nanothermitic accelerant explosives....that cellphones didn't work at 34,300 feet....on and on and on...
clbackus 9 months ago
@clbackus whatever, theres nothing thats going to be said on youtube that will a) change anybodys mind and b) prove anything about anything. thats facts are, there was a conspiracy on 9/11. i choose to believe that the people with all the motivation in the world to kill Americans were the ones who did it. we also caught the masterminds behind it and htey confessed. idk what else you want. you might be able to cut and paste together w.e facts you want but still none of it makes any sense
Danro05 9 months ago
@Danro05 W/E! W/E?? You seem to rather enjoy disinformation and complete lies, when faced with scientifically verifiable facts. That's called wanton denial. What makes sense, is the official conspiracy theory is a blatant obvious cartoon fiction fairy-tale, and you can sit here in denial all you want, that won't change anything. You first need to believe in reality, you can't choose your own reality. Try, try as you might, the facts are still the facts. It's time to wake up my friend! EOT
clbackus 9 months ago
@Danro05 Youtube is a big Light-sheding machine to the many people, who otherwise would not have the means upon which to build their opinion. Of course with every communicated fact the question remains to be answered by YOU: Does this sound plausible to me, or does this need further investigation? But it frees you from dependence of authorites !
Littlewhitelephant 8 months ago
@Danro05 You're behind on your info. NIST has reported in their latest Q&A that the diesel fuel from the storage tanks in WTC 7 had little to no impact on the collapse of the building. They also state that something like 90% of the fuel has been accounted for. Either way diesel fuel cannot produce free fall in the progressive collapse of a building.
Ahlywog 8 months ago
Agreed they did it ....! and all you have to do is ask why ?
Renagadepatriot 9 months ago
Ha i think the reason they stuck with controlled demolition instead of destroying everything the buildings could cover was cause they didnt have multimillion dollar leases on every other buildings except for the world trade center complex.
LeafDot1 10 months ago
Get agents scully and mulder on it, it was the aliens that shot jfk and invented the freemasons which control our minds and set up the explosives on building 7 so that no one would know. George bush went back in a time machine and invented the CIA to create the lies that we see today, DON'T BELIEVE THEM THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE!!!
joeltopgun 10 months ago
great job with facts and common sense..thank you!...
hd150 10 months ago
I will join the truth movement in New York on 9/11 2011! EXPOSE THE TRUTH!!!
Born2Flesh 10 months ago 4
the difference bw "truthers" and the government/official 911 report is that the "truthers" provide evidence to support their claims, while the government just expects u to believe whatever is on the official report w/o providing evidences.
campodutylagops 10 months ago 29
@campodutylagops Correct. AND the Commission of the "Official Report" has members who also feel the report is flawed. A 'non-official' investigation should be conducted. It may seem unpatriotic to some, but I'd rather find the truth through facts and clean out this mess, than let there be 'another' 911 - or a Middle East/N. Africa movement.
milackk7 10 months ago
@campodutylagops That's because most people do believe what the fed by "their" government. Sadly. They should know better.
RamsesReturns 5 months ago
I love how the perpetrators of this conspiracy are willing to kill thousands of people within the towers and on the planes but apparently still take the time execute a perfect controlled demolition.
IseeSpiders 10 months ago
The presence of thermite in building 1 & 2 is easily explainable as a reaction with the aluminium on the hull of the plane and iron oxide on the support pillars (presence of thermite supported by journal articles). If some one could show me evidence of some journal articles that shows that thermite was significantly present in building 7 it would be conclusive of demolition since there would be no explanation possible of how that reaction could occur unless it was placed.
BioGuelph 10 months ago
awesome...i got the 60,000 veiw...nice vid haha :D
TheTort15 10 months ago
The WTC buildings were literally surrounded by thousands of people at all times for months after the attacks. Do you really think that 100% of all those people would have missed a controlled demolition? You can't just sneak into a building, set up all your charges, and push the fire button without anyone noticing. It is just absurd to think that they could secretly pull this building down in the midst of downtown Manhattan during those first historic weeks after the attacks.
bertdanger 10 months ago
@bertdanger I'm sorry, but you are sorely mistaken on what you are talking about. The building was demolished at 5:20pm on 9/11, it was not weeks after the attacks, it was on the DAY of the attack. That means the set-up happened pre/9-11.In relation to the CD set-up, don't forget about the technologies available at the time, and the capabilities. Things like remote detonation devices for CD charges, things like paint-able nano-thermite, etc. All patented and in the case of RD devices, commercial
clbackus 10 months ago 30
@clbackus nano thermite? really? only recently has anyone even managed to make a nanotube...and now you say we have incendiary at 1/1000th of an inch?
Wrathruler 10 months ago
@Wrathruler I'm not aware of nanothermite being commercial, but I didn't say that did I? I said remote-controlled demolition transmitters and receivers are commercially available. As far as nanothermite, yes, the military and government does have these advanced energetic nanocomposites. Los Alamos, the Naval Surface Warfare Center, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have all produced ultra fine grain (UFG) aluminum powders, a key component of most nano-thermitic materials.
clbackus 10 months ago 5
@clbackus yes..you are saying people are grinding aluminum and other ingredients to 1/1000th of an inch..do you comprehend how fine that is? i don't think even HEPA filters could catch that fine a grain.
Wrathruler 10 months ago
@Wrathruler Yes, I do comprehend how fine that is. The technologies governments and the military-industrial complex have developed and perfected is beyond comprehension in many respects...So, to say it is improbable or impossible to do is only conjecture.
clbackus 10 months ago 5
@Wrathruler
That's why it is called NANO....
dugall1 10 months ago
@Wrathruler You must not research before you speak, Nano termite has been around for awhile, Wiki it shit is completely real.
Sheep!
MittWaffen 10 months ago
@clbackus I'm afraid sir you are very much mistaken on your last point. The cutter charges and remote detonators according the correction and back-pedalling on AE for 9/11 truth debunks your comments. I've read the correction and it is basically saying the the cutter charges and remote detonators well they are not sure they exist. Tim Sullivan sold a turkey by saying the remote detonators exist because they appear in movies!!! In fact I'll quote the correction for you.
hornetgags 8 months ago
@hornetgags You trolls are annoying, but must be dealt with. You are full of BS on this comment. I just read the AE911truth article you posted this from. No where does it say remote detonators or cutter charges do NOT exist. In fact, the article shows an example of one, and here is another: freepatentsonline*com/y2006/0266204*html They are talking about one specific device and not calling it a cutter charge. A far cry from your claim they don't exist. You trolls amaze me with your delusion.
clbackus 8 months ago
@bertdanger You are so delusional.
bigbradford69 10 months ago
@bertdanger Well shame on our engineers that build such a crappy buildings that fall down so quickly because of fire. Shame on our government in which they didn't pass a law regulating a tougher laws on building code. I would hire engineers from Africa and other third world countries to approve our standards.
May those engineers burn in Hell if they have designed a building that fall down because of a stove and half piece of paper on fire. Oh no.. i light my cigarette.. house falling
lucas911611 9 months ago
@bertdanger they probably didn't just walk in with boxes marked TNT like in some cartoon...
sophiewtf 9 months ago
What to me would constitute something of a better proof for people who question would be another video with a source of sound other than the sound of the building collapse(say music from a visible source or people talking). The video could be distorted, edited for any purpose. I don't think to be the case, however video with audio that is much harder to change the tempo of because it would carry with it obvious flaws(music that is at too fast a tempo for instance), and if verified...
thenorm05 11 months ago
spiritmong Wow, you can do stats (whop-de-do). Taking into evidence the owner of the building, his statement to the press, and his insurance settlement that is three of three for motive, opportunity and intent. It is clear that the building should a) not have come down in its entirety b) all at once c) how thermite was in there then you are just another statistic that has clue. Start with the facts (aka evidence) not the stats. Stats can be make to lie in anyones favor.
usmcoth 11 months ago
Call me crazy but...I think 911 was an inside job !
luc649 11 months ago
Oh my God. I cannot ignore your compelling presentation. Thank you clbackus. NOW WHAT? If 9/11 was orchestrated somehow by our government, what in God's name do we do?
Blondie267267 11 months ago
@Blondie267267
Wake more people up. The NWO needs us to police ourselves.
Just think about it.
How many cops would pull you over for speeding or something that is not even a crime, if they were aware that it was actually illegal and that they are working for the NWO?
Store some food and supplies. Vote in local elections. Warn other people. That is all you can do, and it is all we need.
DiabloUniverse 11 months ago
You want the truth? Flight 93 was supposed to hit bldg 7 to provide the ignorant some plausability of a buildings destruction where otherwise none could exist.
View the shots of white hot metal pouring out of the bldgs before collapse. You cannot get 4000 degree white hot molten metal with a 1000 degree fuel fire. It can ONLY be thermite/thermate. Molten metal Incancesense cant be faked and is irrefutable proof.
morttodd 11 months ago
The US Bureau of Labour Statistics lists 1.6 million employed engineers in the US, 30% of which work in architecual and related engineering. So that is approx 480 thousand. Now if 1300 architects and engineers believe it was a controlled demolition that represents 1300 out of 480 thousand, which equals 0.2708333%
Therefore only approx 0.271% of architects and engineers in the USA believe it was a controlled demolition. And that is just the USA. Extrapolate that to the whole world!!!
spiritmong 1 year ago
@spiritmong Your statistics couldn't be more flawed. What percentage of the 480k number have ever even heard of WTC7 even? And of the ones that have heard of it, how many of them have heard of AE911truth? Now, of the ones who have heard of both, and have questions, how many of those have stepped up to the plate and have gone through the process of signing the petition? Of the ones that have, how many of those are in the backlog of the verification process at AE911truth? Come on man, get a life!
clbackus 1 year ago 20
You have raised some good points, which is refreshing for a conspiracy nut, and I admit that there is some flaw (I'm not afraid of scrutinizing my findings unlike conspiracy theorists)
However, even if a large percentage of 480k had heard of building 7 wouldn't that automatically mean they would agree with the controlled demolition theory. Maybe they would, maybe not.
Also, if 1300 or 1400 hundred architects and engineers believe it then surely word would of spread around the community.
spiritmong 1 year ago
@spiritmong That's why I said, have questions. But hearing of something, and actually looking into, researching and doing the most basic of physics equations is another altogether. I would trust that most critical thinking architects and engineers who did their HW would come to the conclusion that a free-fall collapsing building into the path of greatest resistance is impossible from fires alone. Just think about the energy it takes to convert all of that GPE into KE.
clbackus 11 months ago
@spiritmong ....and not slow down at all. The building structure just "gets out of the way for the falling structure above it, without providing any resistive capability?" Bullshit. Absolutely Bullshit...No, the engineers who are presented it properly, so they can see the facts, they get it, they understand. The ones who hear from their Cousin Vinny on the street, who knows nothing about Science and Engineering, are just going to blow it off without giving the thought any credence whatsoever.
clbackus 11 months ago
@clbackus Good. Also would like to add that these are 1300 professionals with careers and probably families STICKING THEIR NECKS OUT, saying "the government is lying". Not surprised only .02 whatever percent came forward.
lahillsm3 11 months ago
@spiritmong A lot of people are afraid of saying anything.. so many people have been fired for speaking out. Many people are also not able to because of the psychology involved.
wygram 11 months ago
@spiritmong funny how you say conspiracy NUT.. which essentially states you believe him(forgot theorist). aand its the falsers that definetly have more trouble arguing/debating this topic. They for the most part don't even consider it debate making their opinion baised. Most truthers are just wanting a further investigation, because their are clear disrepenancies in the NIST and FEMA reports, not just that but things like the cleveland airport mystery, and the lack of debris at the pentagon.
rickyp17 11 months ago
@spiritmong
If you believe the official (George 'dubya' Bush) fairy-tale about "terrorists" then it is YOU who is the conspiracy theorist and nut-job.
WTC7 clearly came down at free-fall; same as the towers.
How can you refute this after the evidence is presented clearly to you!
Your only defense is that the architects would have spread this information around more?!
The pentagon stole 2.3 TRILLION $ the day before 9/11:
watch?v=OlnQTcLHaMM
imagine the silence that would buy...
SteveFusionX 11 months ago
Also, as far as I know, there isn't any national or international recognized enginerring body who have joined, or support the controlled demolition hypothesis.
Maybe AE9/11 should reach out to such groups and ask for their opinion.
AE911 have been on mainstream news channels that are watched by millions so they certainly have good marketing.
Finally, everybody has seen the collapses on TV, including architects or engineers. If they were doubtful they would of looked into it and found AE911
spiritmong 1 year ago