They should have left the bear alone. Is is such BS that people feel the need to kill an animal for killing a person. There are far less bears then humans. And if the parents are dumb enough to leave a child unprotected then the parents are the ones that should be shot.
@khellendrose, You said, "people feel the need to kill an animal for killing a person" and, "the parents are the ones that should be shot." So it's OK to shoot the parents, but not kill an animal? You logic is weird. Really weird...
Yes, I place an animal's life above mine. Always. In fact, I'm heading to the woods right now to sacrifice myself in the name of saving animals.
Hunting is part of any well-organized game management program, fools! Too many bears, and they starve. Too few bears and their prey's population mushrooms.
Keep camp clean-never leave food garbage coolers cooking equipment-utensils out-Lock food in vehicle trunk or hang 4m between 2 trees.Dont cook/eat in or near tent or trailer.
Sleep 100yds from where food is hung cooked & eaten.Keep sleeping gear clean & free of food odor. Don't sleep in clothes worn while cooking & eating; hang it in plastic bags. Treat soap, deodorant same manner as food. Bears may be drawn to odors connected to menstruation-double-bag used tampons store same as garbage.
they kill bear first and then test to see if it had killed boy? wtf? what if it didnt? and why is the boy sleeping alone? if i were go camping, i would go with some dogs(for early warning) :)
BOTTEM LINE be prepared in the bush. Be armed and you have a safer probability as your outcome should a random attack occur. It isnt a trailer park out there folks. When you drive a car you have a choice to wear a seat belt or not accidents can be punished severely by common sense. Its a shame and I feel for the family and the boy .he had no type protection to begin with.
I camp in the woods but I always have a gun ready and loaded at all times. I also make a fishing line parameter with bells as an early warning. I never trust nature in the deep woods as they are wild animals that can turn on you in an instant. It's too bad it has to be that way but my family protection comes first at all times. I'd fire a few rounds so fast and scare the shit out of that bear before he knew it.
Is this the bear's land or our's? If that bear had as much mercy on that boy as some of you treehugging people have for the bear, the boy would still be alive.
How does bear meat taste like? Maybe I'll go bag me a big one when it's open season and have that sh*t stuffed and put it in my backyard for bowhunting practice, right through the lungs.
So they killed the bear? That's bullshit! The only reason they killed that bear...The bear was black!!! I'm sick....I'm sorry the boy was killed. Ok....stop laughing....think of the boy.
i live at the mountains i always go out at the woods and i dont like to use the trails i am always alert wich sucks cause sometimes when i go deep and get lost i don't really enjoy the beuty of my around cause i am very afraid of bears i think from all the large animals around none would take me down faster than a bear i alway carry a knife and in every walk make me some kind of spear but i know it is just give me a false sense of security ... it sucks that nature is so rude
I NEVER, NEVER, NEVER go in to the mountains unarmed (hell, I never go anywhere unarmed, but especially not in to the mountains!). 9 out 10 times you will never need a gun, but why chance that one time!? It makes no sense to me why people will just not take precautions to protect themselves and their families. I just don't get it...
Oh well, I guess some people just refuse to learn... IT IS A DANGEROUS WORLD, go armed! At least give yourself a fighting chance.
Well, sometimes it is not practical to carry a gun since it's just too heavy (when backpacking long distances); however, I have been deep in bear country(alone and un-armed), if a bear had attacked me, there was nothing to protect my-self with ;(
He deserved death out of emotions, and it's instinct for the kid's parents to want it dead. It's not what I "think", it's that I know it deserved death.
are you stupid? theres nothing to justify, its just nature all people shouldnt mess with bears or other large predators, cause theres always danger involved and as sad as it maybe the family provoked it cause they camped in bear country, never take children to bear country
bears, espically black bears generally avoid humans. they could have left food out or not stored it properly to get the bear interested. but a bear that attacks someone needs to be shot because of the likely hood of another attack on a human. you dont know anything about bears, when they lose their fear of people they become much more dangerous for everyone. talk to any wildlife expert or park ranger and they will say the same thing. i wouldnt take a kid into bear country though.
I can't believe that some people are trying to justify what the bear did. That just makes me sick. And some are even blaming the father for it. Maybe if you saw a picture of what the bear did to the boy, you'd think differently. Have some human compassion for god's sake.
Ya ovbiously the only one to blame is the father, don't fucking camp in bear country, unless you are prepared for the outcome of the risks you are taking, to avoid being hit by a train i dont play on train tracks, to avoid being ate by sharks, i dont swim in shark waters, to avoid being ate by bears, i dont camp in bear country!!!!!!!!!
hes not mothefucka!your stupid idiot when people go camping in bear coutry they should know the risk, he has to get shot, but he only searched for food, and as sad it is the bear found a young boy, its nature, and humans are stupid enough to take such risk, so they new the chances
Evey summer 2 or 3 people are killed by black bears around where I live, almost every time its in bear country, now they made a rule saying that they will only shoot the bears that attack within the town limits, that makes sense to me, its sad the boy was so young however its his father who is to blame, if I put my son in a tent near wild bears and he got killed, I would only blame myself, not the bear!
If they let the bear go on, there is a very high probability that he'll HUNT more humans, especially children so they shot the muthafucka! What's the big deal?! Don't give me some BS like he was just protecting his territory, he was hunting humans/ he was hungry, he was fienin' for some flesh okay, they can't get protein from berries.
yeah, shoot down the motherfuckin bear, i mean what the hell? just like the grizzly man, he protected and loved these beasts, and what did he get in return? he got mauled and devoured like hell. oh and btw, his gf was also killed. damn, Im with you man.
it pisses me off they go and kill the bear.... it is a tragedy but they are wild animals....there are very few bears and way too many humans...why not kill the human that kills a bear as well....
Listen, it has nothing to do with emotions or "deserving" anything. It is nature and survival of the fittest, period. In the wild, 1 bear against 1 unarmed human child, the bear wins. BUT, 1 bear hunted down by a group of humans, guns, and dogs--bear loses. Survival of the fittest. There is no such thing as "the land belong to the wildlife". The land belongs to whomever or whatever is the strongest to take it. Right now, it is humans...this could change.
One of the things that will make a bear charge you with a quickness is if she fears you are a threat to her young. Same with humans except we have longer memories and more diligence. Humans may not not be able to kill the threat to their child right then and the child may die BUT, it is pretty much a given that the humans will band together, hunt down, and "kill the killer". We are just as much a part of nature as everything else. Survival of the fittest, natural selection.
So they going to kill a bear, cause he's trying to survive in his own environment? The family shouldn't of been camping especially in that area. That's their fault. Not the Bear's.
i agree with you that family went to camp to the enviorment of the bear at their own risk, the bear is wild and he will eat what is in his enviorment in this case the boy,
"Horrible grammar"? My god I put a slang word and now you call me out on something as pathetic as that. Didn't put an apostrophe! How murderous! I honestly expected you to call me out on my grammar because perhaps it was so "horrible" that you couldn't understand something that I said. But apparently it's another one of your attempts to insult me since there is no other reason to point such petty nonsense out. But hey, I once again proved that your denial of your use of insults is dishonest.
Yes, horrible grammar. You have made many mistakes now between all of your posts. It wasn't an attempt to insult you. Remember, you asked me what the errors were. Actually, you practically begged me to show you the errors. There are only two things you have proven. The first is that you are obsessed with using Middle School insults because you lack self esteem and a better argument. The second is you are very unaware of how the real World works, and watch too much TV.
And then proceed in pretending that "Building = destruction" was my actual argument, purposely overstating my position and then telling me how stupid my argument (or rather, your deliberate misrepresentation of my position) is. It takes a special sort of denseness to refute your own position like that.
I never said your argument was "stupid", so I imagine that's how you feel about your own argument now. Remember, you said it, not me. I said your argument was ridiculous. I'm not like you, I don't need to come up with Middle School insults and use that in place of a decent argument. Once you realized you dug a hole for yourself, you are now pretending like you didn't mean that. Sorry, but anyone who decides to read my post, and your response to it, would realize that you implied as much.
"Destructing? So building equals destructing? As I said before you are not aware of how things work." Not only is this another petty attempt to insult me but it attempts to mis represent my actual argument and then proceed to ridicule it, so in essence you're portraying it as stupid. Ridiculous? Fine, put in the same context it remains another thinly veiled insult on your part, not to mention a dishonest one.
I didn't insult your argument, I just shot it down. I never said your argument was stupid, but that's how you see it, since you said it and I didn't. I don't need to rely on childish Middle School insults. I have proven all of your arguments invalid and mine valid. I only refer to your horrible grammar and misunderstanding of things because you go around saying "stupid" and "fucking retarded", and so on and so forth. That's like someone calling another a moron, and spelling the word wrong.
No they wouldn't, read my post again for what it meant. Don't tell me what I meant when clearly it wasn't building = destruction. You came up with that statement not me. Its not my problem you read it wrong and assumed I hold such a retarded position, but then again, you're insecure as always, so you'll attempt to argue otherwise knowing full well you are wrong.
I said that we contribute to this World by building. Your response was a question, which was "How does destruction of the world's environment contribute to any meaningful progress?". You actually put a period instead of a question mark, which was yet another error on your part. But anyways, I said we contribute by building, and your response was "How does destruction of the World's enviroment contribute to any meaningful progress?". So therefore you implied that building= destructing.
called "grammatical mistakes", so once again I feel like you have a need to beat your chest again and insult me with such remarks (oh the irony with you pulling the "insult" card again).
Insulting you? I'm actually trying to help you with all the grammatical mistakes you are making. I'm not throwing out Middle School insults like you are. I'm simply too old for that, how about you?
No you are making unsupported assertions of non existent grammatical mistakes and are also failing to point them out. This only means that those statements are only a veiled attempt at insulting.
I also noticed that you never responded to one my posts. I asked what your excuse was for the deaths in other Countries/Continents. It's actually quite common for a fatality to happen at the hand of an animal in say Africa and/or India. However, a lot of them actually happen just a few feet away (their version of a front porch so to speak) from the Humans' homes. I don't get mad when a Human is killed by an animal, as long as he posed a threat to the animal, but the kid was just camping.
Are you fucking retarded? Go "view all comments" and you will see the message directly responding to your arguments on human fatalities on other continents. The kid was just camping? Maybe the bear felt threatened because the kid was camping out in what the bear considered its own territory? You can camp out in a lion's den and not mean any harm, it doesn't mean the lion pack might not be threatened. Same thing for this scenario, except obviously on a lower scale.
Actually I did go to view all comments, and the 3 nearest responses to those posts all have nothing to do with what I stated. For a second there, I actually believed you responded to it and I may have just missed the post by accident, but I looked at the 3 nearest posts to that post of mine, none of which were direct responses to my aforementioned post.
Actually its the one right under it. You end you statement with animals being known to kill humans without "reason". And I start off addressing that and the rest of my post addresses yours in its entirety. Unless of course you wish me to go pull up every recorded incident of a human being killed by an animal and make an excuse for it, something you know is quite absurd. So the only logical way to respond to that post would be in general terms, which I did.
You're right, you did respond to it, that was my bad.
But to respond to it, I don't care if the animal needs food. The case I was referring to, is of a man who took care of it, including giving it food. So to excuse the elephant just by saying it was hungry is simply a poor excuse. Animals have been proven to kill without reason. If an animal is already fed, and still kills, now what's it for? Again, what's your excuse now?
Your problem is you keep saying "What the Bear considered it's territory", yes I know that Bears feel it's their territories, but to Humans it's not their territories. Furthermore, regardless of the circumstances, if a Bear mauls a boy, it deserves to get killed.
Ah, there you go again spouting your OPINION. Its not an established fact that the bear "deserves" to get killed. Thats just you beating your chest as always like a cluster fuck of other low end human beings that never think about the bigger picture (which, surprise, is NOT this one runt getting killed).
And you claim you provided "facts" and not "opinions". And then you wonder why I throw insults at you? Because of the above observations, not because of "insecurity" or any of that nonsense.
I didn't spout any opinions. I spouted commonly known facts. I appreciate your concern though.
It is an established fact. You just so happen to dislike that fact. The bigger picture is the fact that the boy was brutally killed by a bear, and so the bigger picture to the boy's family and anyone else with a brain is that the bear should be killed for it.
No you are making unsupported assertions of non existent grammatical mistakes and are also failing to point them out. This only means that those statements are only a veiled attempt at insulting.
Unsupported? Oh the irony, the support is/are in the post(s) where you make the grammatical mistake(s).
Insulting? No, I didn't call you out on your mistake to insult you. I called you out on your mistake because when you are going around calling someone a retard like a little kid, I don't expect you to make such a simple mistake.
You failed to point out any grammatical mistakes, so it must mean they don't exist and you are simply trying different ways to engage in veiled insults towards me. Don't get butthurt when I point that out. Don't pretend like this is the 1st time you've ever been called a retard, because if it was, you wouldnt be so worried about it like you are now.
There are four grammatical mistakes in this very post of yours. You said "butthurt", which isn't a word, and it seems as though you have some sort of twisted obsession with that Middle School insult. You also said "wouldnt", but it's "wouldn't". Lastly, you only put one space after your periods. There, I called you out and showed you some of your mistakes. Are you happy now? You have horrible grammar, and you throw out Middle School insults, no one believes that you are older and "tough".
I don't understand the reason why the bear needs to be shot after killing the boy. It's a sad thing indeed that the boy was killed, but there seems to be no further reason to shoot the bear. It doesn't bring the boy back to life. It's a bear, what the hell did you expect?!
And scumbags like you should be wiped out completely off the face of the earth systematically so as to avoid further impeding of progress. People like you are the lowest forms of life on earth.
Your dumber then a box of rocks. I guess we should do it like in africa. Chase of people, So worthless animals like lions, elephants, hyenas, cheetahs etc have a place to live. So rich people have a place to go hunting. Then use the same people they banned from the land as thier guides. If you want to live with a man killing animal go ahead. if I see 1 within rifle range from my place I wiill kill it.
They also reminded me that those who camp in their home in structures made of the same ingredients as a shower curtain are, quite possibly, not in a position of total mind control. We all agreed on this and I came back to let you know, when you and I have blown one another to bits the earth, hopefully, will still be here. What will NOT be here are tiny parcels of land known as "property". There will be ONE Earth....and those who inhabit that land will,
LAME. they shouldn't kill the bear just because it was living its natural life. the humans invaded the bear's territory. pisses me off so much when they kill animals for being animals.
I agree with you. the bear was just doing what it does naturally, either defend it's territory or looking for food. Humans make a big deal when an animal does something natural when we are the biggest violators of nature.
It's a big deal when a little boy is killed. They were not "violating" nature, they were just camping and unharming the habitit and the bear itself. Bears obviously just can't talk things through, and jump to conclusions so to speak.
Auctually we are the biggest violators of nature. We kill and eat all kinds of defenseless animals. We raise pigs and cows just for the slaughter, and decapitate chickens, but nobody hunts us down and kills us for it.
Bottom line, the bear was to the kid, what we would be to a thanksgiving turkey. Just the Food Chain in motion pal.
I never said we weren't. But those people in the video were not violating nature. Eating is not violating nature, or else 99.99999% of living things on this Planet would be major violators of nature. The bear didn't attack for food, so much as he did because he felt they were violating his territory, which they weren't. And just because we are all living beings, doesn't mean everything can be compared exactly the same. Many animals don't care as much for their youngsters like humans do.
I would agree if they were actually doing something wrong to the territory. But they weren't. A boy was killed just for doing nothing more than camping, and not harming the bear. Bears don't have a way of talking things through like we do, and attack if they feel threatened. Naturally, if it kills a human, it will be killed because of it.
You say let them live because all they are doing is "trying to live". Yeah, just like bank robbers are trying to live, they just don't have the money.
Key words.."The FIRST fatality caused by a black bear in the history of the state". But we're so thanksful that we have brave hunters to protect us when WE go to the bears home, eat food in our tents and then wonder why a bear, who has been "unintentionally INVITED" to tear apart a tent.
Right above this is another video. "Man talks his way out of bear attack". Watch it. Words work with bears much better than with hunters...and a bear doesn't call you a fag for being more intelligent than he.
I would respectfully disagree..the entire Earth is home to ALL of us. The Animals got along fine until WE began destroying them and their home. I'm not downplaying the death of the boy at all. That's a tragedy......but the entire forest IS their home. It always has been. Then we began to push them harder and harder. We put out food for them. We bait them to kill them. We abuse nature horribly...and every now and again, SHE reminds us that MAN does not decide what's right or wrong. She does.
The way the World works is, your home is your purchased property where you stay to live. By those rules, the Bears just have to take parts of the forest where no humans are at. Any unpurchases properties are bound to the Government. The people camping weren't destroying any homes. Take a picture before and after camping, and look at both pictures, and you'll find both of them will be very much the same.
DPW.....I found this response SO entertaining that I brought it to a couple of bear friends of mine and asked them to read it. The both looked at the paper, looked at me and shook their heads. Ya' know what? NOBODY told them that the land on which they've lived since the beginning of time had been taken away by some gringo with a pen. While brighter than most humans, they've never been taught to read.
By the laws of Evolution, one can say that we've been here just as long, if not longer. What happens is you are a depressed person who puts too much thought into things like this, that it really blinds your potential knowledge. I've seen many cases like you. It is not their land. They never told us it was their land either, why? Because unlike you, I realize that bears can't talk in the same manner that we do, and of course because it's not their land to begin with.
To DPW123: you said a boy was killed just for doing nothing more than camping? You know you're contradictiing yourself because as humans we over exploit all the resources more than anything else in the world: the fish was not doing anything wrong to you and we plough the seas like anything, the cattle did not do anything to you, we mass breed them and slaughther them by the millions, the other animals and plants did not do anything but we over cultivate....cont'd
so a bear defending it's territory and because it can't speak, it used it's instinct and natural behavioural response. This is reasonable. What is UNreasonable is when a man, after eating his belly, takes his gun to go bear hunting for the fun of it. Unreasonable is when humans skin animals just because their fun would look nice on their handbags, just because and what not. So a bear defending it's territory is reasonable and if a kid is killed, too bad, that's how nature was intended to be.
The difference is most Humans need meat to survive. Bears can do just fine without eating Humans.
And once again, it's not the bear's territory, it's the Governments' (unless a Human personally owns the land).
It's also far more painful for a kid to get mauled by a bear than it is for a bear to be killed in one shot. It's also a kid who has yet to live his life, whereas most bears that are shot are full grown adults.
It is the bear's natural territory dumbfuck, go learn something about wildlife. Humans simply take over and encroach ecosystems in which indigenous wildlife used to thrive. Please keep you pussy lips shut before typing out bullshit like that again.
I'm actually huge on National Geographic, so don't ever tell me to go learn something about wildlife. It's technically not their territory. Both you and I know about wildlife, but the difference is I also know History and Government. "Please keep your lips shut before typing", what do lips have to do with typing? Thanks for proving what a moron you are. If all you can do is throw out Middle School insults because you lack a better argument, stick your fingers up your ass and don't type.
"Technically not their territory"? According to who? Any wildlife expert will tell you that wild animals have a natural territory of their own. If some douchebag kids get killed by stepping into the vicinity of a bear's natural habitat, its their problem. The bear does not have the intelligence of a human being and acts upon natural instinct. Stop pretending as if it has a "choice" between berries and a little runt in a tent. It finds food and eats it in order to survive.
Simply because some douchebag government came in and laid claim to uninhabited land does not lend merit to shoot a bear after it had killed a runt who came upon its natural territory. Again, quit pretending like the bear is smart enough to "know" whats "right" and "wrong". Those are terms to be used within the civilized world, not in nature, where everything is based on instinct. We are slowly encroaching on the natural habitats of the world and destroying ecosystems in droves...
which will come back to bite us in the ass as a species in the worst time possible. And people like you only exacerbate the problem with selfish nonsense by trying to enact legal issues onto wildlife. What you claim would make sense if bears had an acute sense of right and wrong, but surprise dumbfuck, they don't, they act upon natural instinct. But I wouldn't expect you to understand that, you're stuck in retard mode, as usual.
Oh and as for "keeping your pussy lips shut", thats an expression. I didnt expect you to be so dense as to take that literally, but then again, you're a retard, I should've established that a while ago. You're like one of those yokels that gets pussy hurt when someone tells you to stop talking and attempts to "correct" them by telling them that you were actually "typing", knowing full well what the context of their message was. Again, you demonstrate another inherent trait of Cerebral Palsy.
I can see that you don't understand the definition of dense either. I'm sorry, I usually don't nit pick on these technicalities, but when I see someone trying to act smart and tough by going around and throwing out childish Middle School insults, I expect him/her to actually have common sense. So yes, if you are going to make as many grammatical mistakes as you do, I'm going to call you out on it, because you feel compelled to call me a retard, yet you lack simple common sense. Just grow up.
As usual, you are using nothing but Middle School insults to try and hide the fact that you have no legitimate argument.
What makes you think you can decide that enacting legal issues into wildlife is any worse than making "natural habitat" excuses for the Bear? It's not any worse. You are enacting the nature of wildlife into the civilized World simply by making excuses for the Bear killing the kid, and thus I enact legal issues into wildlife. It's all fair game.
Because preserving a sustainable environment and natural habitats around the world is more important than letting a bunch of douchebags entertain themselves by encroaching upon nature and putting themselves in harm's way, and when things don't go their way, attempt to solve the problem by further needless intervention into the natural habitat.
And I fully understand the definition of dense, and that sentence made perfect grammatical sense. You might want to elaborate the next time you try to criticize my grammar, instead of trying to be dishonest. A good 1st step for children like you would be to check up on the definition of "dense" yourself. And what makes you think that I am trying to "insult" you? I am merely making observations, no need to get butthurt about it. You have yet to show me the so called "many grammatical mistakes"...
that you've alleged me to engage in. I lack simple common sense? Unsupported assertion. I have made perfectly valid arguments and you got butthurt over it, so you attempt to deviate from the topic by attacking my non existent grammatical mistakes. (oh the hilarious irony between that and your "Middle School insults" comment).
Unsupported assertion? Well I'm just playing your game, I just made an observation.
Perfectly valid arguments? Wrong, you are very unaware of how things actually work, and I can see that you are one of those people who choose to whine when an animal is killed and try to pretend like you think animals lives are just as important, if not more important than Human lives. To be continued...
I am very aware of how things work, it doesnt justify your argument though. And yes, I believe a species survival is more important than one moron's who decides to knowingly put themselves into danger and then expect payback when something wrong happens.
No, you are not aware of how things work. Again, knowingly put themselves in danger? That doesn't even make sense. Like they took their kid there knowing there was danger. And you said you were aware of how things work, please. I believe an animal's existence is important, but not as important as a Human's, that's for sure.
You mean they didnt know that the bears in the park represent a certain risk factor? Man if thats the case I am glad the stupid bitch died, its one less retard in the world to deal with. How is a human's life more important than a bear's in this scenario when the bear could not make a conscious choice and it was the humans that put themselves out in the open as free food for the bear? We need to cut down on our population growth, and this was one of nature's ways of doing so. fighting back...
Once again, this would be the right time for me to call you dense. It was the first fatality to ever happen in that area, so before that the area was never seriously dangerous. Bears were not known to wonder around that area. I can understand this perfectly, as I've never seen a Bear in the nearest Forest around where I live. Infact, there are never any Bear sightings over here. Like I said, you've never had a Kid before, so you wouldn't understand.
Understanding the bigger picture is more important than "understanding" a family's desire to somehow "avenge" their son's death. What do you do when you get into a car accident? Start putting cars on fire? What about when a family member gets shot by a druggie? Start taking away guns that are legally owned by law abiding citizens knowing full well this would not result in a drop in crime? What do you do when you get killed by wildlife? I'd say you should consider it an accident and leave it...
The bigger picture? From who's perspective? If my kid were killed, the big picture would be my kid was killed and I'm going to do everything I can to make sure that Bear doesn't live the rest of it's life happy. There's a difference between a car accident, and a bear mauling a kid. A car accident is just that, an accident. A bear mauling a kid wasn't an accident, atleast not from the Bear's perspective.
That's nice, but your opinion and feelings for your kid are worth less than dogshit, because the bigger picture isn't based upon your opinion or perspective. And its the humans making the choice to kill the bear here, so the only perspective on whether its an accident on or not here that really matters is that from the human's standpoint.
What opinions? I don't remember having any opinions in this topic. Sorry if you were misinformed yet again, but everything I've said are pure facts. Yes, the Humans chose to kill a Bear based on what he did to a boy, so what's your point? They are perfectly right in doing so.
See? you saying they are perfectly right in doing so is a mere opinion. Not a fact. How fucking retarded can you get? There was no reason to kill the bear for its actions as it did not have the conscious choice to differentiate between its meals. the humans put themselves in harms way, they are to blame.
Let me ask you something, what's your excuse for the animals in other Continents/Countries? What's your excuse for people who get killed on their own land in India? What about Africa? What's your excuse then? Animals are proven to be dangerous period, so for you to use any sort of excuse, especially a "territory" one, is absurd. Animals have been proven to kill without reason. To be continued...
Without reason? You already know the fucking reason, its based on instinct. They simply want to find food and humans get in their way. Its that simple. Its the human race's problem of overpopulating and stretching itself out and intruding on animal habitats thats to blame, not the animals.
See, there you go using that instict argument again. This would be one of those times to use the word dense (atleast the right time for me to use it). You can use the instinct argument all you want, but guess what? It's instinct to kill a Bear after it kills a little boy. The Human's problem for overpopulating? LOLOL. That's a good one. Making excuses for Bears and talking about their lives as if they were as important as Human lives, yet you say it's our fault for "overpopulating".
Yes but humans can rely on their consciousness and aknowledge the fact that the bear acted upon instinct and did not kill the boy intentionally an that the family put themselves at risk and therefore were the ones at fault. Sadly, they fail to realize this. And yes it is our fault for over populating, I dont see how thats funny, maybe your pussy is a little itchy so you burst out laughing.
This is where you are confused yet again. You think that the person who shot the Bear didn't think before shooting it, but you're wrong. The guy was fully aware of the circumstances, and the fact that a little boy was killed overrode anything else, and so he killed the Bear while being perfectly aware that the Bear killed upon instinct. That's a Human instinct, to kill a Bear when it kills a little boy. It's instinct when any living thing kills a little boy. Overpopulating? ROFL. Classic.
Understanding the bigger picture is more important than "understanding" a family's desire to somehow "avenge" their son's death. What do you do when you get into a car accident? Start putting cars on fire? What about when a family member gets shot by a druggie? Start taking away guns that are legally owned by law abiding citizens knowing full well this would not result in a drop in crime? What do you do when you get killed by wildlife? I'd say you should consider it an accident and leave it...
You'll see situations where someone in India raises an elephant and takes care of it, only to be killed by it later on in life. What's your excuse for that? Yes, I've seen situations where a man took an elephant into his own home (well, not literally inside his home, but right outside of it) and raised it, and then he gets stomped by it later on in life without him even provoking it. What's your excuse? To be continued...
No, it didn't make sense, and no, the word "dense" does not belong there. There is one problem (but two choices) with you calling me a child. Either I'm older than you, so I guess that would make you a baby, or you're an older person who isn't anywhere near as smart as someone who is younger (me). I'll let you pick one of those two. If you're 23 or older, it would be the second option, if you aren't, it would be the first option. When did I say I was hurt by your insults? TBC...
And yes the word dense was properly placed there, go take a look up on the definition and check back with me next time, until then feel free to shut the fuck up. 2 choices given by whom? Who are you to give me a choice in this matter? I am merely making an observation, and your behavior is reminiscent to that of a child. And apparently you need to "tell" me that you are hurt by "insults" in order for it to be the case? I figured I could simply observe that with you beating your chest all thetime
When did I say I was hurt by your insults? Again, you are simply revealing that you are only doing this because you lack self esteem, so it makes you feel tough and better to throw out childish insults over the Internet. Seriously, grow up. The insults don't hurt me, and they certainly don't make you look tough. As for the word "dense", I don't need to look it up for me to know that you used the word incorrectly. Who am I to give you a choice? Fine, I'll choose for you, I'll choose #1.
I already told you that you need not inform me of whether you are insulted by my remarks, as it is clearly evident in your responses. And yes you should really go look up the word 'dense', since it was used in the right context. if you plan on attacking my grammar, elaborate, don't tell me some BS about how my "grammar sucks" and run away like a panzy. Burden of proof stays with you.
You are insulting me, but it certainly isn't hurting me. It's your goal, but you fail miserably every time. Like I said, I'm more than 10 years removed from Middle School, so no those simple childish insults do not get to me. The insults actually reveal your anger. And no, the word dense was not used in the right context. Run away? No no, I'm right here my friend. Elaborate? What more would you like me to say other than that you used the word incorrectly?
My "insults" arent hurting you? Once again, lets go back to you retarded assertion where you claim that you mustve "told" me that you were hurt. I never claimed this, you did. I can simply infer that you are butthurt over it because you keep bringing the topic up over and over again. You shoudlve learned this in Middle School.
I never said I was hurt over it. It's your willingness to believe I'm hurt over it that's making you say these things, you think you are tough because you can insult behind a computer screen. Well, good luck with that my friend. I understand that you have a low self esteem.
Where did I say you claim that you are hurt over it? Its a conclusion I came to after observing your obsession of addressing the so called "insults" i threw at you. Again you make an unsupported assertion. I think I'm tough because I insulted you over the internet and you got butthurt enough to call me out on it? LOL
Well my good friend, I'm off for now. I'm sure when I come back, I'll see a ton of childish insults and no valid argument whatsoever, all coming from you. I should be a fortune teller, I know I hit the nail on the head on this one. Well, goodbye for now my friend.
No, I made quite a few valid arguments, and you failed to address them. Instead you focused on my "insults" quite a bit, which can only mean 2 things. Either you're incompetent and can't support your side of the argument and instead try to nitpick at my insults -or- you're an insecure little shit that got offended by a few minor gibes which is why you spent most of your messages addressing that rather than my argument for the topic at hand.
What you find as valid arguments, are simply not valid arguments. I've addressed all of them, and it seems each time I do address them your response consists of nothing but childish insults. You are actually revealing several traits of someone who would be insecure. The insults just so happen to be a part of that. You have a low self esteem, so it makes you feel better to act tough over the computer. Though it is pathetic, it's also somewhat common on the Internet these days.
Again, those were mere observations of your attempt to deviate from the topic and to try and address how I "insulted" you. That only shows insecurity.
I stayed on topic while addressing your Middle School insults. Some of your posts are just nothing more than Middle School insults. It's insecurity on your part. Ask any psychologist (that's probably going to turn into another Middle School insult by you), a perfect sign of insecurity is when someone has to insult just to make themselves feel better because they have a low self esteem. You have a low self esteem, so it makes you feel tough to insult someone over the computer.
No, posting insults does not imply insecurity, its just my style. But apparently I hit a nerve with you on it so you keep dwelling on that topic. Oh and thats another unsupported assertion, the nonsense about my "self esteem".
Yes, a forest is a Bear's natural habitat. But how big is that Forest? How much space does a small Family camping take up? It's technically the property of the Government, unless it belongs to another person, which would obviously be a Human as well. But these people were taking up a small space, and there's much more room in the Forest, so your excuse is that them chilling in a tent somehow ruins their space (and it's not even their space to begin with)? LOL That's a load of BS.
thats why when i go camping i bring my sported mosin nagant set up on a bipod pointing right out the tent :D
mattybooy123 8 months ago
pedobear
balo666 1 year ago
They should have left the bear alone. Is is such BS that people feel the need to kill an animal for killing a person. There are far less bears then humans. And if the parents are dumb enough to leave a child unprotected then the parents are the ones that should be shot.
khellendrose 1 year ago
@khellendrose, You said, "people feel the need to kill an animal for killing a person" and, "the parents are the ones that should be shot." So it's OK to shoot the parents, but not kill an animal? You logic is weird. Really weird...
TheHarvestBand 1 year ago
WTF did they have to kill the bear?!
renagtz 1 year ago
Yes, I place an animal's life above mine. Always. In fact, I'm heading to the woods right now to sacrifice myself in the name of saving animals.
Hunting is part of any well-organized game management program, fools! Too many bears, and they starve. Too few bears and their prey's population mushrooms.
It's called wildlife resource management...
Sheesh!
TheHarvestBand 2 years ago
@TheHarvestBand Wouldn't be necessary if people didn't encroach on natural habitats though.
teejate 1 year ago
fuck you wex5 you are so very pathetic overreacting , rottin asshole! ur such a loser! be careful about your mouth!
shewatchme 2 years ago
when i go camping i will bring my knife, machete, my 357 revolver, my 45 cal. 9mm, m4, bullet prof, helmet, combat shoes, and extra ammunition.
preventing is better than cure. LOL
dy2dlb 2 years ago 3
yezz. finaly a kid got killed. oh mean. i must celebrate this by opening a champagne bottle. good bear.
wex5 2 years ago
What a wierd thing to say. Is that what humour is in Norway?
sugar240682 2 years ago
and which fault has the bear when we humans invades his life habitate?
one bear less ... 10 points for the human race.
rextav 2 years ago
that is the chance you take when you go into the wild. I don't think the bear should have been killed.
tyrone9009 2 years ago
great
BwagBnaT 2 years ago
Why hunted?? To go to jail? Or maybe be judged? It´s wild life!! That boy shouldn´t be there!!! WTF???!!!!
bodtorent 3 years ago
simple revenge. anything that even touches a human should be put to death.
sharpezor 3 years ago 2
Really smart... Well done, keep on trying, kid.
bodtorent 3 years ago
you're an idiot.
sharpezor 3 years ago
Once again...
bodtorent 3 years ago
You're still an idiot...
sharpezor 3 years ago
yep, he's an idiot
bvillercr 3 years ago
another human too?
you're an idiot.
9K58 2 years ago
you're right. I've changed my opinions on these matters in the last few months.
sharpezor 2 years ago
kid probably had candy or snacks in his tent.
shaystamang 3 years ago
Keep camp clean-never leave food garbage coolers cooking equipment-utensils out-Lock food in vehicle trunk or hang 4m between 2 trees.Dont cook/eat in or near tent or trailer.
Sleep 100yds from where food is hung cooked & eaten.Keep sleeping gear clean & free of food odor. Don't sleep in clothes worn while cooking & eating; hang it in plastic bags. Treat soap, deodorant same manner as food. Bears may be drawn to odors connected to menstruation-double-bag used tampons store same as garbage.
waterswheel 3 years ago 2
shes about to cry when she starts talking about the kid being drug
36cfrocksmysox123455 3 years ago
they kill bear first and then test to see if it had killed boy? wtf? what if it didnt? and why is the boy sleeping alone? if i were go camping, i would go with some dogs(for early warning) :)
madmax797 3 years ago
All wildlife big enough to kill humans should be terrified of them. More more more hunting.
3psychos 3 years ago
BOTTEM LINE be prepared in the bush. Be armed and you have a safer probability as your outcome should a random attack occur. It isnt a trailer park out there folks. When you drive a car you have a choice to wear a seat belt or not accidents can be punished severely by common sense. Its a shame and I feel for the family and the boy .he had no type protection to begin with.
lazernteebbee 3 years ago
I camp in the woods but I always have a gun ready and loaded at all times. I also make a fishing line parameter with bells as an early warning. I never trust nature in the deep woods as they are wild animals that can turn on you in an instant. It's too bad it has to be that way but my family protection comes first at all times. I'd fire a few rounds so fast and scare the shit out of that bear before he knew it.
lazernteebbee 3 years ago
this is why I never go camping!
doointhedoo 3 years ago
The chances of you getting killed by a bear are slim if you know what you are doing. You are really missing out.
mostnamestaken 3 years ago
Is this the bear's land or our's? If that bear had as much mercy on that boy as some of you treehugging people have for the bear, the boy would still be alive.
66SiK 3 years ago
How does bear meat taste like? Maybe I'll go bag me a big one when it's open season and have that sh*t stuffed and put it in my backyard for bowhunting practice, right through the lungs.
66SiK 3 years ago
So they killed the bear? That's bullshit! The only reason they killed that bear...The bear was black!!! I'm sick....I'm sorry the boy was killed. Ok....stop laughing....think of the boy.
mark2063 3 years ago
i live at the mountains i always go out at the woods and i dont like to use the trails i am always alert wich sucks cause sometimes when i go deep and get lost i don't really enjoy the beuty of my around cause i am very afraid of bears i think from all the large animals around none would take me down faster than a bear i alway carry a knife and in every walk make me some kind of spear but i know it is just give me a false sense of security ... it sucks that nature is so rude
azaquihel 3 years ago
I NEVER, NEVER, NEVER go in to the mountains unarmed (hell, I never go anywhere unarmed, but especially not in to the mountains!). 9 out 10 times you will never need a gun, but why chance that one time!? It makes no sense to me why people will just not take precautions to protect themselves and their families. I just don't get it...
Oh well, I guess some people just refuse to learn... IT IS A DANGEROUS WORLD, go armed! At least give yourself a fighting chance.
Zwisedude 3 years ago 2
Well, sometimes it is not practical to carry a gun since it's just too heavy (when backpacking long distances); however, I have been deep in bear country(alone and un-armed), if a bear had attacked me, there was nothing to protect my-self with ;(
arizona0j0 3 years ago
It's better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it
sgreen4 3 years ago
niiiiicccceee AVP quote there bud:P
gotta love that movie
thomasw99 3 years ago
i need em
thedogisoutthere 3 years ago
bears! do we need em?
a280281 3 years ago
staffdog360 you make me sick it wasent that persons fault i am glad to have taken park in tracking down that bear.
sniperinahole 3 years ago
He deserved death out of emotions, and it's instinct for the kid's parents to want it dead. It's not what I "think", it's that I know it deserved death.
54spiritedwill54 3 years ago
u deserve death,u stupid prick
mulonzee877 3 years ago
are you stupid? theres nothing to justify, its just nature all people shouldnt mess with bears or other large predators, cause theres always danger involved and as sad as it maybe the family provoked it cause they camped in bear country, never take children to bear country
Casio24 3 years ago
bears, espically black bears generally avoid humans. they could have left food out or not stored it properly to get the bear interested. but a bear that attacks someone needs to be shot because of the likely hood of another attack on a human. you dont know anything about bears, when they lose their fear of people they become much more dangerous for everyone. talk to any wildlife expert or park ranger and they will say the same thing. i wouldnt take a kid into bear country though.
jarrodm2002 3 years ago
I can't believe that some people are trying to justify what the bear did. That just makes me sick. And some are even blaming the father for it. Maybe if you saw a picture of what the bear did to the boy, you'd think differently. Have some human compassion for god's sake.
66SiK 3 years ago
You are a total idiot, dont fucking camp in a bear den if you dont wanna be ate by a bear, how stupid are people!
Staffdog360 3 years ago
Ya ovbiously the only one to blame is the father, don't fucking camp in bear country, unless you are prepared for the outcome of the risks you are taking, to avoid being hit by a train i dont play on train tracks, to avoid being ate by sharks, i dont swim in shark waters, to avoid being ate by bears, i dont camp in bear country!!!!!!!!!
Staffdog360 3 years ago
hes not mothefucka!your stupid idiot when people go camping in bear coutry they should know the risk, he has to get shot, but he only searched for food, and as sad it is the bear found a young boy, its nature, and humans are stupid enough to take such risk, so they new the chances
Casio24 3 years ago
What if it was your child?
summit42 3 years ago 2
@summit42 what if it was my friend you idiot
Twilighters4 1 year ago
my dad and hisfamily used to camp in yellowstone back when he was a boy,hes had bears walk byhis tent and even atacked the car
nicholasbhicks 3 years ago
@nicholasbhicks His name was samuel right?????
Twilighters4 1 year ago
Evey summer 2 or 3 people are killed by black bears around where I live, almost every time its in bear country, now they made a rule saying that they will only shoot the bears that attack within the town limits, that makes sense to me, its sad the boy was so young however its his father who is to blame, if I put my son in a tent near wild bears and he got killed, I would only blame myself, not the bear!
Staffdog360 3 years ago
I have hiked and camped in this area for 15+ years and never seen bear. The Father was not to blame... how could you even say that?
summit42 3 years ago 2
If they let the bear go on, there is a very high probability that he'll HUNT more humans, especially children so they shot the muthafucka! What's the big deal?! Don't give me some BS like he was just protecting his territory, he was hunting humans/ he was hungry, he was fienin' for some flesh okay, they can't get protein from berries.
66SiK 3 years ago
yeah, shoot down the motherfuckin bear, i mean what the hell? just like the grizzly man, he protected and loved these beasts, and what did he get in return? he got mauled and devoured like hell. oh and btw, his gf was also killed. damn, Im with you man.
gudkizzah 3 years ago
it pisses me off they go and kill the bear.... it is a tragedy but they are wild animals....there are very few bears and way too many humans...why not kill the human that kills a bear as well....
mcline007 3 years ago
you are an idiot!
dreambrew 3 years ago
Listen, it has nothing to do with emotions or "deserving" anything. It is nature and survival of the fittest, period. In the wild, 1 bear against 1 unarmed human child, the bear wins. BUT, 1 bear hunted down by a group of humans, guns, and dogs--bear loses. Survival of the fittest. There is no such thing as "the land belong to the wildlife". The land belongs to whomever or whatever is the strongest to take it. Right now, it is humans...this could change.
Girli951 3 years ago
Part 2
One of the things that will make a bear charge you with a quickness is if she fears you are a threat to her young. Same with humans except we have longer memories and more diligence. Humans may not not be able to kill the threat to their child right then and the child may die BUT, it is pretty much a given that the humans will band together, hunt down, and "kill the killer". We are just as much a part of nature as everything else. Survival of the fittest, natural selection.
Girli951 3 years ago
The commentaters rack is really nice!!!
briandarga 3 years ago
she looks like she is crying her voice
Ipod1234df 3 years ago
DPW123 is a friggin idiot, rotfl.
WaroftheGalaxies 4 years ago
So they going to kill a bear, cause he's trying to survive in his own environment? The family shouldn't of been camping especially in that area. That's their fault. Not the Bear's.
WaroftheGalaxies 4 years ago
i agree with you that family went to camp to the enviorment of the bear at their own risk, the bear is wild and he will eat what is in his enviorment in this case the boy,
Garzo67 3 years ago
uMbnmLLnsfw&feature=related in yahoo search. Watch this. unprovoded bear attack, Boating down river. kill them all
drddeckerz 4 years ago
"Horrible grammar"? My god I put a slang word and now you call me out on something as pathetic as that. Didn't put an apostrophe! How murderous! I honestly expected you to call me out on my grammar because perhaps it was so "horrible" that you couldn't understand something that I said. But apparently it's another one of your attempts to insult me since there is no other reason to point such petty nonsense out. But hey, I once again proved that your denial of your use of insults is dishonest.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Yes, horrible grammar. You have made many mistakes now between all of your posts. It wasn't an attempt to insult you. Remember, you asked me what the errors were. Actually, you practically begged me to show you the errors. There are only two things you have proven. The first is that you are obsessed with using Middle School insults because you lack self esteem and a better argument. The second is you are very unaware of how the real World works, and watch too much TV.
DPW123 4 years ago
And then proceed in pretending that "Building = destruction" was my actual argument, purposely overstating my position and then telling me how stupid my argument (or rather, your deliberate misrepresentation of my position) is. It takes a special sort of denseness to refute your own position like that.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
I never said your argument was "stupid", so I imagine that's how you feel about your own argument now. Remember, you said it, not me. I said your argument was ridiculous. I'm not like you, I don't need to come up with Middle School insults and use that in place of a decent argument. Once you realized you dug a hole for yourself, you are now pretending like you didn't mean that. Sorry, but anyone who decides to read my post, and your response to it, would realize that you implied as much.
DPW123 4 years ago
"Destructing? So building equals destructing? As I said before you are not aware of how things work." Not only is this another petty attempt to insult me but it attempts to mis represent my actual argument and then proceed to ridicule it, so in essence you're portraying it as stupid. Ridiculous? Fine, put in the same context it remains another thinly veiled insult on your part, not to mention a dishonest one.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
I didn't insult your argument, I just shot it down. I never said your argument was stupid, but that's how you see it, since you said it and I didn't. I don't need to rely on childish Middle School insults. I have proven all of your arguments invalid and mine valid. I only refer to your horrible grammar and misunderstanding of things because you go around saying "stupid" and "fucking retarded", and so on and so forth. That's like someone calling another a moron, and spelling the word wrong.
DPW123 4 years ago
No they wouldn't, read my post again for what it meant. Don't tell me what I meant when clearly it wasn't building = destruction. You came up with that statement not me. Its not my problem you read it wrong and assumed I hold such a retarded position, but then again, you're insecure as always, so you'll attempt to argue otherwise knowing full well you are wrong.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
I said that we contribute to this World by building. Your response was a question, which was "How does destruction of the world's environment contribute to any meaningful progress?". You actually put a period instead of a question mark, which was yet another error on your part. But anyways, I said we contribute by building, and your response was "How does destruction of the World's enviroment contribute to any meaningful progress?". So therefore you implied that building= destructing.
DPW123 4 years ago
called "grammatical mistakes", so once again I feel like you have a need to beat your chest again and insult me with such remarks (oh the irony with you pulling the "insult" card again).
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Insulting you? I'm actually trying to help you with all the grammatical mistakes you are making. I'm not throwing out Middle School insults like you are. I'm simply too old for that, how about you?
DPW123 4 years ago
No you are making unsupported assertions of non existent grammatical mistakes and are also failing to point them out. This only means that those statements are only a veiled attempt at insulting.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
I also noticed that you never responded to one my posts. I asked what your excuse was for the deaths in other Countries/Continents. It's actually quite common for a fatality to happen at the hand of an animal in say Africa and/or India. However, a lot of them actually happen just a few feet away (their version of a front porch so to speak) from the Humans' homes. I don't get mad when a Human is killed by an animal, as long as he posed a threat to the animal, but the kid was just camping.
DPW123 4 years ago
Are you fucking retarded? Go "view all comments" and you will see the message directly responding to your arguments on human fatalities on other continents. The kid was just camping? Maybe the bear felt threatened because the kid was camping out in what the bear considered its own territory? You can camp out in a lion's den and not mean any harm, it doesn't mean the lion pack might not be threatened. Same thing for this scenario, except obviously on a lower scale.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Actually I did go to view all comments, and the 3 nearest responses to those posts all have nothing to do with what I stated. For a second there, I actually believed you responded to it and I may have just missed the post by accident, but I looked at the 3 nearest posts to that post of mine, none of which were direct responses to my aforementioned post.
DPW123 4 years ago
Actually its the one right under it. You end you statement with animals being known to kill humans without "reason". And I start off addressing that and the rest of my post addresses yours in its entirety. Unless of course you wish me to go pull up every recorded incident of a human being killed by an animal and make an excuse for it, something you know is quite absurd. So the only logical way to respond to that post would be in general terms, which I did.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
You're right, you did respond to it, that was my bad.
But to respond to it, I don't care if the animal needs food. The case I was referring to, is of a man who took care of it, including giving it food. So to excuse the elephant just by saying it was hungry is simply a poor excuse. Animals have been proven to kill without reason. If an animal is already fed, and still kills, now what's it for? Again, what's your excuse now?
DPW123 4 years ago
Your problem is you keep saying "What the Bear considered it's territory", yes I know that Bears feel it's their territories, but to Humans it's not their territories. Furthermore, regardless of the circumstances, if a Bear mauls a boy, it deserves to get killed.
DPW123 4 years ago
Ah, there you go again spouting your OPINION. Its not an established fact that the bear "deserves" to get killed. Thats just you beating your chest as always like a cluster fuck of other low end human beings that never think about the bigger picture (which, surprise, is NOT this one runt getting killed).
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
And you claim you provided "facts" and not "opinions". And then you wonder why I throw insults at you? Because of the above observations, not because of "insecurity" or any of that nonsense.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
I didn't spout any opinions. I spouted commonly known facts. I appreciate your concern though.
It is an established fact. You just so happen to dislike that fact. The bigger picture is the fact that the boy was brutally killed by a bear, and so the bigger picture to the boy's family and anyone else with a brain is that the bear should be killed for it.
DPW123 4 years ago
No you are making unsupported assertions of non existent grammatical mistakes and are also failing to point them out. This only means that those statements are only a veiled attempt at insulting.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Unsupported? Oh the irony, the support is/are in the post(s) where you make the grammatical mistake(s).
Insulting? No, I didn't call you out on your mistake to insult you. I called you out on your mistake because when you are going around calling someone a retard like a little kid, I don't expect you to make such a simple mistake.
DPW123 4 years ago
You failed to point out any grammatical mistakes, so it must mean they don't exist and you are simply trying different ways to engage in veiled insults towards me. Don't get butthurt when I point that out. Don't pretend like this is the 1st time you've ever been called a retard, because if it was, you wouldnt be so worried about it like you are now.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
There are four grammatical mistakes in this very post of yours. You said "butthurt", which isn't a word, and it seems as though you have some sort of twisted obsession with that Middle School insult. You also said "wouldnt", but it's "wouldn't". Lastly, you only put one space after your periods. There, I called you out and showed you some of your mistakes. Are you happy now? You have horrible grammar, and you throw out Middle School insults, no one believes that you are older and "tough".
DPW123 4 years ago
I don't understand the reason why the bear needs to be shot after killing the boy. It's a sad thing indeed that the boy was killed, but there seems to be no further reason to shoot the bear. It doesn't bring the boy back to life. It's a bear, what the hell did you expect?!
Snotrochel 4 years ago
He should've been killed long before he killed the kid. Bears should have been wiped out when they killed first human.
drddeckerz 4 years ago
And scumbags like you should be wiped out completely off the face of the earth systematically so as to avoid further impeding of progress. People like you are the lowest forms of life on earth.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Your dumber then a box of rocks. I guess we should do it like in africa. Chase of people, So worthless animals like lions, elephants, hyenas, cheetahs etc have a place to live. So rich people have a place to go hunting. Then use the same people they banned from the land as thier guides. If you want to live with a man killing animal go ahead. if I see 1 within rifle range from my place I wiill kill it.
drddeckerz 4 years ago
check out this video.paste this in search box. Y5SkfLcJlwE
If you would like to look like this. go ahead not me no thanks.
drddeckerz 4 years ago
better understand the meaning of...getting along......:^>)
RichBriere51 4 years ago
They also reminded me that those who camp in their home in structures made of the same ingredients as a shower curtain are, quite possibly, not in a position of total mind control. We all agreed on this and I came back to let you know, when you and I have blown one another to bits the earth, hopefully, will still be here. What will NOT be here are tiny parcels of land known as "property". There will be ONE Earth....and those who inhabit that land will,
RichBriere51 4 years ago
is that a girl
hondasniper250 4 years ago
nice rack.
stonedoggy 4 years ago
If the animal starts to develop a taste for humans then it becomes a serious problem.
capparapha 4 years ago
LAME. they shouldn't kill the bear just because it was living its natural life. the humans invaded the bear's territory. pisses me off so much when they kill animals for being animals.
discorecords 4 years ago
I agree with you. the bear was just doing what it does naturally, either defend it's territory or looking for food. Humans make a big deal when an animal does something natural when we are the biggest violators of nature.
adfasffs 4 years ago
It's a big deal when a little boy is killed. They were not "violating" nature, they were just camping and unharming the habitit and the bear itself. Bears obviously just can't talk things through, and jump to conclusions so to speak.
DPW123 4 years ago
*habitat
DPW123 4 years ago
Auctually we are the biggest violators of nature. We kill and eat all kinds of defenseless animals. We raise pigs and cows just for the slaughter, and decapitate chickens, but nobody hunts us down and kills us for it.
Bottom line, the bear was to the kid, what we would be to a thanksgiving turkey. Just the Food Chain in motion pal.
MaximusDread 4 years ago
I never said we weren't. But those people in the video were not violating nature. Eating is not violating nature, or else 99.99999% of living things on this Planet would be major violators of nature. The bear didn't attack for food, so much as he did because he felt they were violating his territory, which they weren't. And just because we are all living beings, doesn't mean everything can be compared exactly the same. Many animals don't care as much for their youngsters like humans do.
DPW123 4 years ago
We kill cows and other animals for food.
That's a main reason of why they're here.
JillStrif 4 years ago
I would agree if they were actually doing something wrong to the territory. But they weren't. A boy was killed just for doing nothing more than camping, and not harming the bear. Bears don't have a way of talking things through like we do, and attack if they feel threatened. Naturally, if it kills a human, it will be killed because of it.
You say let them live because all they are doing is "trying to live". Yeah, just like bank robbers are trying to live, they just don't have the money.
DPW123 4 years ago
Key words.."The FIRST fatality caused by a black bear in the history of the state". But we're so thanksful that we have brave hunters to protect us when WE go to the bears home, eat food in our tents and then wonder why a bear, who has been "unintentionally INVITED" to tear apart a tent.
Right above this is another video. "Man talks his way out of bear attack". Watch it. Words work with bears much better than with hunters...and a bear doesn't call you a fag for being more intelligent than he.
RichBriere51 4 years ago
Sorry, but the entire forest isn't the bear's home.
DPW123 4 years ago
I would respectfully disagree..the entire Earth is home to ALL of us. The Animals got along fine until WE began destroying them and their home. I'm not downplaying the death of the boy at all. That's a tragedy......but the entire forest IS their home. It always has been. Then we began to push them harder and harder. We put out food for them. We bait them to kill them. We abuse nature horribly...and every now and again, SHE reminds us that MAN does not decide what's right or wrong. She does.
RichBriere51 4 years ago
The way the World works is, your home is your purchased property where you stay to live. By those rules, the Bears just have to take parts of the forest where no humans are at. Any unpurchases properties are bound to the Government. The people camping weren't destroying any homes. Take a picture before and after camping, and look at both pictures, and you'll find both of them will be very much the same.
DPW123 4 years ago
DPW.....I found this response SO entertaining that I brought it to a couple of bear friends of mine and asked them to read it. The both looked at the paper, looked at me and shook their heads. Ya' know what? NOBODY told them that the land on which they've lived since the beginning of time had been taken away by some gringo with a pen. While brighter than most humans, they've never been taught to read.
RichBriere51 4 years ago
By the laws of Evolution, one can say that we've been here just as long, if not longer. What happens is you are a depressed person who puts too much thought into things like this, that it really blinds your potential knowledge. I've seen many cases like you. It is not their land. They never told us it was their land either, why? Because unlike you, I realize that bears can't talk in the same manner that we do, and of course because it's not their land to begin with.
DPW123 4 years ago
To DPW123: you said a boy was killed just for doing nothing more than camping? You know you're contradictiing yourself because as humans we over exploit all the resources more than anything else in the world: the fish was not doing anything wrong to you and we plough the seas like anything, the cattle did not do anything to you, we mass breed them and slaughther them by the millions, the other animals and plants did not do anything but we over cultivate....cont'd
adfasffs 4 years ago
so a bear defending it's territory and because it can't speak, it used it's instinct and natural behavioural response. This is reasonable. What is UNreasonable is when a man, after eating his belly, takes his gun to go bear hunting for the fun of it. Unreasonable is when humans skin animals just because their fun would look nice on their handbags, just because and what not. So a bear defending it's territory is reasonable and if a kid is killed, too bad, that's how nature was intended to be.
adfasffs 4 years ago
The difference is most Humans need meat to survive. Bears can do just fine without eating Humans.
And once again, it's not the bear's territory, it's the Governments' (unless a Human personally owns the land).
It's also far more painful for a kid to get mauled by a bear than it is for a bear to be killed in one shot. It's also a kid who has yet to live his life, whereas most bears that are shot are full grown adults.
DPW123 4 years ago
A bear doesn't know it's the governments territory you moron.
CoBros 4 years ago
First off, fuck you. Secondly, I never expected a bear to know that, but don't call it the bear's territory when it's technically not.
DPW123 4 years ago
It is the bear's natural territory dumbfuck, go learn something about wildlife. Humans simply take over and encroach ecosystems in which indigenous wildlife used to thrive. Please keep you pussy lips shut before typing out bullshit like that again.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
I'm actually huge on National Geographic, so don't ever tell me to go learn something about wildlife. It's technically not their territory. Both you and I know about wildlife, but the difference is I also know History and Government. "Please keep your lips shut before typing", what do lips have to do with typing? Thanks for proving what a moron you are. If all you can do is throw out Middle School insults because you lack a better argument, stick your fingers up your ass and don't type.
DPW123 4 years ago
"Technically not their territory"? According to who? Any wildlife expert will tell you that wild animals have a natural territory of their own. If some douchebag kids get killed by stepping into the vicinity of a bear's natural habitat, its their problem. The bear does not have the intelligence of a human being and acts upon natural instinct. Stop pretending as if it has a "choice" between berries and a little runt in a tent. It finds food and eats it in order to survive.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Simply because some douchebag government came in and laid claim to uninhabited land does not lend merit to shoot a bear after it had killed a runt who came upon its natural territory. Again, quit pretending like the bear is smart enough to "know" whats "right" and "wrong". Those are terms to be used within the civilized world, not in nature, where everything is based on instinct. We are slowly encroaching on the natural habitats of the world and destroying ecosystems in droves...
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
which will come back to bite us in the ass as a species in the worst time possible. And people like you only exacerbate the problem with selfish nonsense by trying to enact legal issues onto wildlife. What you claim would make sense if bears had an acute sense of right and wrong, but surprise dumbfuck, they don't, they act upon natural instinct. But I wouldn't expect you to understand that, you're stuck in retard mode, as usual.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Oh and as for "keeping your pussy lips shut", thats an expression. I didnt expect you to be so dense as to take that literally, but then again, you're a retard, I should've established that a while ago. You're like one of those yokels that gets pussy hurt when someone tells you to stop talking and attempts to "correct" them by telling them that you were actually "typing", knowing full well what the context of their message was. Again, you demonstrate another inherent trait of Cerebral Palsy.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
I can see that you don't understand the definition of dense either. I'm sorry, I usually don't nit pick on these technicalities, but when I see someone trying to act smart and tough by going around and throwing out childish Middle School insults, I expect him/her to actually have common sense. So yes, if you are going to make as many grammatical mistakes as you do, I'm going to call you out on it, because you feel compelled to call me a retard, yet you lack simple common sense. Just grow up.
DPW123 4 years ago
As usual, you are using nothing but Middle School insults to try and hide the fact that you have no legitimate argument.
What makes you think you can decide that enacting legal issues into wildlife is any worse than making "natural habitat" excuses for the Bear? It's not any worse. You are enacting the nature of wildlife into the civilized World simply by making excuses for the Bear killing the kid, and thus I enact legal issues into wildlife. It's all fair game.
DPW123 4 years ago
Because preserving a sustainable environment and natural habitats around the world is more important than letting a bunch of douchebags entertain themselves by encroaching upon nature and putting themselves in harm's way, and when things don't go their way, attempt to solve the problem by further needless intervention into the natural habitat.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
And I fully understand the definition of dense, and that sentence made perfect grammatical sense. You might want to elaborate the next time you try to criticize my grammar, instead of trying to be dishonest. A good 1st step for children like you would be to check up on the definition of "dense" yourself. And what makes you think that I am trying to "insult" you? I am merely making observations, no need to get butthurt about it. You have yet to show me the so called "many grammatical mistakes"...
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
that you've alleged me to engage in. I lack simple common sense? Unsupported assertion. I have made perfectly valid arguments and you got butthurt over it, so you attempt to deviate from the topic by attacking my non existent grammatical mistakes. (oh the hilarious irony between that and your "Middle School insults" comment).
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Unsupported assertion? Well I'm just playing your game, I just made an observation.
Perfectly valid arguments? Wrong, you are very unaware of how things actually work, and I can see that you are one of those people who choose to whine when an animal is killed and try to pretend like you think animals lives are just as important, if not more important than Human lives. To be continued...
DPW123 4 years ago
I am very aware of how things work, it doesnt justify your argument though. And yes, I believe a species survival is more important than one moron's who decides to knowingly put themselves into danger and then expect payback when something wrong happens.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
No, you are not aware of how things work. Again, knowingly put themselves in danger? That doesn't even make sense. Like they took their kid there knowing there was danger. And you said you were aware of how things work, please. I believe an animal's existence is important, but not as important as a Human's, that's for sure.
DPW123 4 years ago
You mean they didnt know that the bears in the park represent a certain risk factor? Man if thats the case I am glad the stupid bitch died, its one less retard in the world to deal with. How is a human's life more important than a bear's in this scenario when the bear could not make a conscious choice and it was the humans that put themselves out in the open as free food for the bear? We need to cut down on our population growth, and this was one of nature's ways of doing so. fighting back...
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Once again, this would be the right time for me to call you dense. It was the first fatality to ever happen in that area, so before that the area was never seriously dangerous. Bears were not known to wonder around that area. I can understand this perfectly, as I've never seen a Bear in the nearest Forest around where I live. Infact, there are never any Bear sightings over here. Like I said, you've never had a Kid before, so you wouldn't understand.
DPW123 4 years ago
Understanding the bigger picture is more important than "understanding" a family's desire to somehow "avenge" their son's death. What do you do when you get into a car accident? Start putting cars on fire? What about when a family member gets shot by a druggie? Start taking away guns that are legally owned by law abiding citizens knowing full well this would not result in a drop in crime? What do you do when you get killed by wildlife? I'd say you should consider it an accident and leave it...
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
The bigger picture? From who's perspective? If my kid were killed, the big picture would be my kid was killed and I'm going to do everything I can to make sure that Bear doesn't live the rest of it's life happy. There's a difference between a car accident, and a bear mauling a kid. A car accident is just that, an accident. A bear mauling a kid wasn't an accident, atleast not from the Bear's perspective.
DPW123 4 years ago
That's nice, but your opinion and feelings for your kid are worth less than dogshit, because the bigger picture isn't based upon your opinion or perspective. And its the humans making the choice to kill the bear here, so the only perspective on whether its an accident on or not here that really matters is that from the human's standpoint.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
What opinions? I don't remember having any opinions in this topic. Sorry if you were misinformed yet again, but everything I've said are pure facts. Yes, the Humans chose to kill a Bear based on what he did to a boy, so what's your point? They are perfectly right in doing so.
DPW123 4 years ago
See? you saying they are perfectly right in doing so is a mere opinion. Not a fact. How fucking retarded can you get? There was no reason to kill the bear for its actions as it did not have the conscious choice to differentiate between its meals. the humans put themselves in harms way, they are to blame.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
only exacerbates the problem.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Continued:
Let me ask you something, what's your excuse for the animals in other Continents/Countries? What's your excuse for people who get killed on their own land in India? What about Africa? What's your excuse then? Animals are proven to be dangerous period, so for you to use any sort of excuse, especially a "territory" one, is absurd. Animals have been proven to kill without reason. To be continued...
DPW123 4 years ago
Without reason? You already know the fucking reason, its based on instinct. They simply want to find food and humans get in their way. Its that simple. Its the human race's problem of overpopulating and stretching itself out and intruding on animal habitats thats to blame, not the animals.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
See, there you go using that instict argument again. This would be one of those times to use the word dense (atleast the right time for me to use it). You can use the instinct argument all you want, but guess what? It's instinct to kill a Bear after it kills a little boy. The Human's problem for overpopulating? LOLOL. That's a good one. Making excuses for Bears and talking about their lives as if they were as important as Human lives, yet you say it's our fault for "overpopulating".
DPW123 4 years ago
Yes but humans can rely on their consciousness and aknowledge the fact that the bear acted upon instinct and did not kill the boy intentionally an that the family put themselves at risk and therefore were the ones at fault. Sadly, they fail to realize this. And yes it is our fault for over populating, I dont see how thats funny, maybe your pussy is a little itchy so you burst out laughing.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
This is where you are confused yet again. You think that the person who shot the Bear didn't think before shooting it, but you're wrong. The guy was fully aware of the circumstances, and the fact that a little boy was killed overrode anything else, and so he killed the Bear while being perfectly aware that the Bear killed upon instinct. That's a Human instinct, to kill a Bear when it kills a little boy. It's instinct when any living thing kills a little boy. Overpopulating? ROFL. Classic.
DPW123 4 years ago
Understanding the bigger picture is more important than "understanding" a family's desire to somehow "avenge" their son's death. What do you do when you get into a car accident? Start putting cars on fire? What about when a family member gets shot by a druggie? Start taking away guns that are legally owned by law abiding citizens knowing full well this would not result in a drop in crime? What do you do when you get killed by wildlife? I'd say you should consider it an accident and leave it...
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Continued:
You'll see situations where someone in India raises an elephant and takes care of it, only to be killed by it later on in life. What's your excuse for that? Yes, I've seen situations where a man took an elephant into his own home (well, not literally inside his home, but right outside of it) and raised it, and then he gets stomped by it later on in life without him even provoking it. What's your excuse? To be continued...
DPW123 4 years ago
No, it didn't make sense, and no, the word "dense" does not belong there. There is one problem (but two choices) with you calling me a child. Either I'm older than you, so I guess that would make you a baby, or you're an older person who isn't anywhere near as smart as someone who is younger (me). I'll let you pick one of those two. If you're 23 or older, it would be the second option, if you aren't, it would be the first option. When did I say I was hurt by your insults? TBC...
DPW123 4 years ago
And yes the word dense was properly placed there, go take a look up on the definition and check back with me next time, until then feel free to shut the fuck up. 2 choices given by whom? Who are you to give me a choice in this matter? I am merely making an observation, and your behavior is reminiscent to that of a child. And apparently you need to "tell" me that you are hurt by "insults" in order for it to be the case? I figured I could simply observe that with you beating your chest all thetime
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
When did I say I was hurt by your insults? Again, you are simply revealing that you are only doing this because you lack self esteem, so it makes you feel tough and better to throw out childish insults over the Internet. Seriously, grow up. The insults don't hurt me, and they certainly don't make you look tough. As for the word "dense", I don't need to look it up for me to know that you used the word incorrectly. Who am I to give you a choice? Fine, I'll choose for you, I'll choose #1.
DPW123 4 years ago
I already told you that you need not inform me of whether you are insulted by my remarks, as it is clearly evident in your responses. And yes you should really go look up the word 'dense', since it was used in the right context. if you plan on attacking my grammar, elaborate, don't tell me some BS about how my "grammar sucks" and run away like a panzy. Burden of proof stays with you.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
You are insulting me, but it certainly isn't hurting me. It's your goal, but you fail miserably every time. Like I said, I'm more than 10 years removed from Middle School, so no those simple childish insults do not get to me. The insults actually reveal your anger. And no, the word dense was not used in the right context. Run away? No no, I'm right here my friend. Elaborate? What more would you like me to say other than that you used the word incorrectly?
DPW123 4 years ago
My "insults" arent hurting you? Once again, lets go back to you retarded assertion where you claim that you mustve "told" me that you were hurt. I never claimed this, you did. I can simply infer that you are butthurt over it because you keep bringing the topic up over and over again. You shoudlve learned this in Middle School.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
I never said I was hurt over it. It's your willingness to believe I'm hurt over it that's making you say these things, you think you are tough because you can insult behind a computer screen. Well, good luck with that my friend. I understand that you have a low self esteem.
DPW123 4 years ago
Where did I say you claim that you are hurt over it? Its a conclusion I came to after observing your obsession of addressing the so called "insults" i threw at you. Again you make an unsupported assertion. I think I'm tough because I insulted you over the internet and you got butthurt enough to call me out on it? LOL
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Well my good friend, I'm off for now. I'm sure when I come back, I'll see a ton of childish insults and no valid argument whatsoever, all coming from you. I should be a fortune teller, I know I hit the nail on the head on this one. Well, goodbye for now my friend.
DPW123 4 years ago
No, I made quite a few valid arguments, and you failed to address them. Instead you focused on my "insults" quite a bit, which can only mean 2 things. Either you're incompetent and can't support your side of the argument and instead try to nitpick at my insults -or- you're an insecure little shit that got offended by a few minor gibes which is why you spent most of your messages addressing that rather than my argument for the topic at hand.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
What you find as valid arguments, are simply not valid arguments. I've addressed all of them, and it seems each time I do address them your response consists of nothing but childish insults. You are actually revealing several traits of someone who would be insecure. The insults just so happen to be a part of that. You have a low self esteem, so it makes you feel better to act tough over the computer. Though it is pathetic, it's also somewhat common on the Internet these days.
DPW123 4 years ago
Again, those were mere observations of your attempt to deviate from the topic and to try and address how I "insulted" you. That only shows insecurity.
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
I stayed on topic while addressing your Middle School insults. Some of your posts are just nothing more than Middle School insults. It's insecurity on your part. Ask any psychologist (that's probably going to turn into another Middle School insult by you), a perfect sign of insecurity is when someone has to insult just to make themselves feel better because they have a low self esteem. You have a low self esteem, so it makes you feel tough to insult someone over the computer.
DPW123 4 years ago
No, posting insults does not imply insecurity, its just my style. But apparently I hit a nerve with you on it so you keep dwelling on that topic. Oh and thats another unsupported assertion, the nonsense about my "self esteem".
KnighTC0rE 4 years ago
Yes, a forest is a Bear's natural habitat. But how big is that Forest? How much space does a small Family camping take up? It's technically the property of the Government, unless it belongs to another person, which would obviously be a Human as well. But these people were taking up a small space, and there's much more room in the Forest, so your excuse is that them chilling in a tent somehow ruins their space (and it's not even their space to begin with)? LOL That's a load of BS.
DPW123 4 years ago