BLU-109 2000lb "Bunker Buster" Bomb Rocket Sled Test

[imaginep79]

someone was playing Mercenaries

[Embassadorkingofpeac]

Peace Be Unto All 22 Nations Of Humanity And A Blessed New Year And World Peace For All.

I Bring Unto All Of Humanity The Real Revelation Of St John The Divine, The Return Of The Morning Star In 2012. And The Judgement Of All 22 Nations Of Humanity And Mankind Moreover To All Members Of Power Free All 22 Nations Of Humanity From Your Wicked And Vile Evil Ways...Repent For Your Sins Ask For Mercy For The Time Is Near A Must See At My Site On You Tube Thanks For Watching Enjoy And Be Free In 2012.

[kinstar]

so much for taking cover behind a wall

[TheRazorbackpilot]

Oh brother, I always laugh when I see 9/11 truthers. Haha. Anyway, pretty cool vid even if it does have a pretty generic explosion sound.

[Assi2004]

stupid fake sound, stolen from Command & Conquer: Red Alert or what?

[Cap420]

Bunker buster bomb = what hit the Pentagon on 9-11.

[BakedCd]

@Cap420 Or it was a meteor, or hell maby even aliens with lasers, LASERS!!!

[mikeyboy236]

@BakedCd OH GAWD THEIR EVERYWHERE TIMMY! LASERS BEAMZ!

[charliesacoolkid]

@Cap420 must have zig zagged and hit all the lamp posts before it got to the pentagon then

[Cap420]

@charliesacoolkid I really recommend doing a youtube search for LLoyd England and his taxi cab and/or "The first known accomplice"- it'll open a whole new perspective for you as far as the downed light poles go- also a documentary called National Security alert. Witnesses all said there was a plane on the SOUTH side, not the North side- so it's impossible for the plane to have hit the light poles. Just look at the Pentagon "attack" vid, clearly it is NOT a plane.

[charliesacoolkid]

@Cap420 I never said I didn't believe the conspiracy but it was not a missile that hit the pentagon there is almost 100 people who said they saw it happen. That is alot of people to buy and tell them all to say the same thing without any of them leaking their story to wikileaks.

[charliesacoolkid]

@Cap420 I believe the government is hiding something but I also believe too many people are making shit up to bolster their belief it was an inside job

[chadloz]

Those launches are so awesome to watch

[dgl1962]

Ok, so why aren't we using these on Israeli targets?

[alphamone]

@dgl1962

uhh, because they are not an enemy. Also, they have nukes.

[dgl1962]

@alphamone Israel is our worst enemy in that they spy & pretend to be our friend.

They get hundreds of billions of dollars, bombs, aircraft, ammo, guns, satellite guidance, communications, and huge contracts that give them access to all cell phones and landline billing records (AMDOCS & Verint technologies) which they have back door ways to eavesdrop on our lawmakers, judges, FBI, all of their wives, you and me.

The cash is used to bribe our lawmakers into supporting them.

We Americans lose.

[criticalpass]

I don't know why, but films like this crack me up. Just blowing the hell out of something.

[JSFER2]

Stop talkin all technical, I came here to watch things blow up! :)

[Thorpe741]

Terminal velocity just means an object has reached it's top speed ( See Newtons First law)

[lisag1369]

i wanna ride on that sled down mt.everest

[MrShawn305]

Blu demo has new weapon! Heavy is jealous...

[uzimodem]

kaboom! wow

[UberLifeTroll]

Thumbs up if you searched "Airplane ejaculation."

[accuristau]

That's gotta hurt.

[nolifemerc]

why do you need a warhead when you punched a hole in the concreet, for bunkers not waterdams?

[TheArfdog]

That's how i fuck bitches

[retardiran1boy]

This is from Nevada, close to Area51.

[triathlete77]

Honey, I'm just popping over to see your mother......BOOM!!!

[JetMechMA]

GEEEEZ!!!!!!!! It slices through that four foot thick concrete like it wasn't there, and THEN explodes. I think everyone in that bunker would be dead from the impact alone, give me a break. Why don't they save a couple billion in development cost and just drop a covy of skunks down the ventilator shaft?

[arivera3426]

Daaaaaayum!!! It went through 4 feet of steel reinforced concrete and still fucked their shit up.

[coldfarted]

I will have to read up on it but I do believe Newtons law took wind resistance into account.. the point of his law was not to argue over wind resistance. It was to prove objects accelerated and fell at the same speed due to GRAVITY (unless acted on by an outside force), at the same rate regardless of weight. The only difference being a heavier object will release more kinetic energy on impact because the weight of the object has more energy stored in it.

[trr321321]

@coldfarted "Newton's Law" has nothing to do with wind resistance.

And kinetic energy = (1/2)m*v^2 so if you have two objects one twice as heavy but moving at half the speed, it has half the kinetic energy of the other object. (Multiply by 2 but divide by 2 squared). I can't believe I'm giving physics lessons in YouTube comments. ;-)

[swudeft]

quarter pounder with cheese?

[Prussian7789]

@swudeft a royal with cheese

[swudeft]

@Prussian7789

hell yea :)

[VictoryOrganized]

You people are fucktards. Seriously. Everything does not fall at the same speed, the acceleration due to gravity is the same. Acceleration=/=speed

[coldfarted]

@VictoryOrganized Everything falls at the same speed regardless of weight unless it is light enough or has enough air resistance to be affected by atmosphere.. The only difference in the weight of a falling object would be the kinetic energy it releases on impact. I know you are trying to explain to the other posters Newton's law of physics. A 30,000 pound object will fall at the same speed as a 1 pound object.. however the energy released by a 30,000 object will be much greater.

[m1leswilliams]

@coldfarted Everything falls at the same speed regardless of weight unless it is light enough...

Regardless of weight.

[jesse54216]

@m1leswilliams Wrong. Terminal velocity varies directly with the ratio of weight to drag. More drag means a lower terminal velocity, while increased weight means a higher terminal velocity. An object moving downward with greater than terminal velocity (for example because it was affected by a downward force or it fell from a thinner part of the atmosphere or it changed shape) will slow until it reaches terminal velocity.

[m1leswilliams]

@jesse54216 You are right, I was copying the guy above, he said that "everything falls at the same speed regardless of weight unless it is light enough". So I think he was a little confused.

[SixTFPS]

Do you reckon I could ride along on it? If I wear a helmet with a visor?

[plinkman0]

I like how they dipped into an archive of stock sound effects and dubbed that generic explosion sound over it, because otherwise we might be too stupid to know that we were watching an explosion.

[zeroanor]

@plinkman0 Was just about to say the same thing

[doodskie999]

Still Osama Bin Laden is Hide And Seek champion since 2001...

[TheRidersChoice]

@doodskie999 not anymore numb nutz

[datzfast]

were not being told the truth that bomb didnt slow down, try at least 20 feet of concrete.

[mysteryman605]

When will man ever stop thinking of ways in which to destroy one another ?" All I'am saying, is give peace a chance...????" Please ?? o.k. I can see i am not going to get any support here......goodbye folks...exiting stage left....

[icanmyshoetie]

@mysteryman605 lol good luck with that.Ever since man has walked the earth there have always been wars, it will never change.thats just the way it is

[07War07]

FTW BLU-109 Bunker Buster

[00bean00]

WOW! For some reason that was so much more impressive than a big fireball blast, CGI or not.

[gypshasballs22]

SHIT THEY MISSED THE BLACK LINE well do it again

[kemist00]

haha that test took place at sandia national laboratories (who r now in charge of nuclear technologies lol

[waz324]

@kemist00

took place at NAWS China Lake Ca,

[alcockell]

COOL! What does G13 do?

[obifongkenobi]

T12 Cloudmaker!

[Kevintb10]

the only reason heavy things fall faster on EARTH is because of wind resistance which has to do with terminal velocity so SHUT UP ABOUT IT

[Sacroxx]

@Kevintb10 hitmyselfwithbouttle**

[TheThehasjdog]

@Kevintb10 ure a fucking nerd

[Kevintb10]

@TheThehasjdog Im a nerd, because I am more knowledgable then you are? You're fucking retarded.

[TheThehasjdog]

@Kevintb10 ure still a fucking nerd , ass whiper...

[Kevintb10]

@TheThehasjdog Making fun of someones intelligence is a sign of insecurity :)

[jesse54216]

@Kevintb10 Or a good sense of humor. Just kidding.

[Kevintb10]

@jesse54216 Lol

[kilkun]

@TheThehasjdog So he's Caucasian?

[m1leswilliams]

@TheThehasjdog Wiper ?

[TheThehasjdog]

@m1leswilliams heab...

[2000Trunks]

@Kevintb10 how heavy it is has nothing to do with anything,it's the surface area that increases drag and decreases speed

[Kevintb10]

@2000Trunks If two blocks are dropped. Block A - weighing 10 pounds; Block B - weighing 100. They both have the same surface area, neither are hollowed the density throughout the two is equall so wind drag will not tilt them to their sides. Block B - will hit the ground first because it is less prone to air resistance then Block - A, because Block - B weighs more and has a higher density. If it was on the moon all of those variables are eliminated. No air means everything will fall the same. :)

[stargate937]

@Kevintb10 um doesn't wind resistance slow things down as they fall hence the name Resistance

[Kevintb10]

@stargate937 Has to do with weight. Mre something weighs faster it'll fall because wind/air cant effect it as much as say a feather which falls slowly because of its weight. Also surface area and density have to do with it, but i wont get into that.

[firewurker]

@Kevintb10 and gravity helps :D

[Why2bless]

Wow thats fast.

[TheTomyossarian]

usually used in runway denial, not bunker busting. although i'm sure its role in the latter would be sufficient.

[adlsp]

NorwegianCrows,

go back to your medication

[Weirdo10o4]

Everyone hates you.

[PuhnkssV001]

Cheesy explosion sound effect.

[ascisl]

dude thats from command and conquer

[Telepcanin]

generals :)

[Sarugakai]

KAAAMEAHEAMAHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­

[ww2footage]

install engine from F16(129 kN) behind MOP(13 tons) and launch it from B52 in 15 km altitude ,then start F16 engine with afterburner so it will have speed about 3 Mach before impact.. that will be the real bunker buster

[fruchttragend]

Unpractical, leak of cost-efficiency and a solid rocket propultion is far better that using a jet engine with thousands of parts and plus use a B52 bomber to achieve all that. NOT gonna happens

Sound like a crazy scientist in the early 50's

[disturbedone5009]

Or you can build something similar to the grandslam bomb used by the British in WW2 but scaled up. Drop it from the max altitude a B52 could reach. That would be one hell of a bunker buster.

[fruchttragend]

Yeap men,,, that sound more practical than a jet+bomb+b52+mach3+kaboom

Or just use the blue berry bunker buster

already in use.. Take no prisioner kind of stuff...

Thanks for replying dude!

[disturbedone5009]

Yeah a 2,000 lb bomb dropped from a few miles high would really be hauling ass when it hits the ground.

[steve0619]

well, any bomb would, weight is kindoff irrelevant

[disturbedone5009]

The greater the weight the greater speed it would reach in free fall plus it would be carrying much more energy.

[steve0619]

thats pretty embarresing if you think greater weight means it falls at greater speed.

oh dear.

[disturbedone5009]

If you read what I said you would see that I said it would reach a greater speed in free fall not that it would fall faster than a lighter object.

[steve0619]

except, it wouldnt reach a greater speed, pretty basic physics here, weight doesn't affect the speed of anything falling

[disturbedone5009]

No but the heavier an object is the more greater the speed it reaches before air resistance equals the force of gravity. Gravity pulls everything at the same rate but heavier objects will reach a greater terminal velocity.

[steve0619]

Wrong, its not about weight in any way, its only down to shape / surface area.

[disturbedone5009]

Take a ceramic brick and a foam brick with the same external dimensions. Are you saying they will both reach the same speed if the fall for the same amount of time?

[steve0619]

Not just me saying it,

I'm trusting galileo

[disturbedone5009]

I think you are mixing up acceleration with terminal velocity. They will both accelerate at the same rate 9.8m/s2 but the brick will reach a higher velocity because for air resistance to equal gravity it has to be moving faster.

[TheSasha555]

We used these in Vietnam and they didn't work.

[disturbedone5009]

@TheSasha555

What?

[Jackle61]

@TheSasha555 They probably weren't laser guided, so they may have worked just fine,,, just didn't always hit the target.

[coldfarted]

@disturbedone5009 WRONG.. unless you are talking about airfoils or feathers. A 2 ounce ball bearing will fall at the same speed as a 30,000 pound bomb. The only way a heavier or lighter object will fall at different velocities is if they are affected by wind resistance. If the object is light enough and has enough surface area then it will fall slower due to outside atmospheric conditions. Put a 100 pound ball and a feather in a vacuum chamber and they will fall at the same velocity.

[disturbedone5009]

@coldfarted

No shit. I said that objects accelerate at the same rate but will reach different velocities when falling. Why do you think sky divers use large parachutes? It increases the air resistance to counter gravity.

[mustang684]

terminal velocity.

[disturbedone5009]

Yeah I just didn't think too many people would understand what that is.

[rrcaires]

pwnage

[EthanSurbaugh]

knock knock! KABOOM!

[walidot]

more like kno...BOOOOOOOOOOOOM

[ELITECRONTIE]

thats aswome? funking cool!!!!!!!!!!!1

[voevoda43]

nice