Added: 10 months ago
From: JasonMovieGuy
Views: 8,006
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (109)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Great list, and pretty much on point, but I would have added Julia Roberts for Erin Brockovich

  • also, SWEEEEEET graphical transitions, jackass.

  • As usual, your lists are horrendous. You hit like two points out of fifteen. You are right that I shouldn't watch them because they make me realize fools like you have absolutely no clue what actual acting is. Bullock didn't deserve it? Matlin didn't deserve it? Cher and Lange didn't deserve it? I truly believe you either didn't watch their roles or base your videos solely on biased opinions which you should state at the beginning of your video... also what a complete fool you are.

  • @gettruckin If you think Sandra Bullock deserved her Oscar, you're a fucking idiot. It is known as the worst choice ever for Best Actress, and all her competition was superior. Grow a dick you cunt.

  • I totally agree with you on Cate Blanchett winning over Gwyneth Paltrow.

  • what about either bette davis and gloria swanson losing in 1950?!!?!? c'mon that's a travesty

  • Meryl DEFINITELY should have beaten Sandra. Although Sandra was pretty good in her role, there are quiet a few actresses who could have played that part. Nobody else could have replaced Meryl. Her look and character portrayal were out of this world. Just my two cents.

  • I have to disagree with your pick of Sigourney Weaver over Marlee Matlin on a technical issue. Had the director's cut been released, I would have supported Sigourney Weaver all the way ... bu the theatrical cut stripped out some of her absolute best acting ... it was a real crime!

  • Um the most undeserved winner is Gwyenth Paltrow. Cate Blanchett blew her out of the water

  • geez ,go back to garbage collector.lol

  • @allisonnova1 Your job, right?

  • Whilst I thought Hilary Swank was good in Million Dollar Baby, I have to agree and say that Kate Winslet deserved it more

  • I agree some of these performances perhaps shouldn't have won, but none of them were bad. Especially not Jodie Foster!

  • Wait a Minute: Louise Rainer, Geraldine Page and Jodie Foster were great in their roles!

  • @missuniworld Louise Rainer did not deserve to beat Greta Garbo in Camille honey. Thats a FACT.

  • Helen Hunt, Katharine Hepburn's 81 win, Reese Witherspoon-- alot I agree with here, but Geraldine page is one of the BEST performances ever...

  • I disagree with the premise that a performance is one of the worst because it beat out a performance you thought was better. Some great performances are just beat out by other great performances.

    That said, I agree that Helen Hunt was the weakest of the 1997 nominees for Best Actress; I would have given the Oscar to Judi Dench.

    Some of the weaker winners include Elizabeth Taylor in 1960 (over Shorley Maclaine), and of course Mary Pickford in 1929.

  • people who make videos like this must be really pathetic to care this much about the way other people perform in their careers lmao. get a real accomplishment for yourself in life cause this is truly sad.

  • Two words - HELEN HUNT!!!

    And how can you say Glenda Jackson didnt deserve her 2nd Oscar, that's utter balls???

    Oh, and Meryl Streep - most overrated actress in history! Julie and Julia - piss off! Didnt deserve it for Sophie's choice, didnt deserve it for Kramer vs Kramer. Meryl will be winning yet another undeserved Oscar this year for a DREADFUL performance as Margaret Thatcher.

    Remember, its a popularity contest not an acting award.

  • ellen should of beat julia,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and cate beating gwenyth is the biggest disgrace is oscar history it is now well known gwenyth dated the head of oscars at the time and he made her win, shame , shame, shame, kill gweyth , kill gwenyth, save meryl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!

  • Comment removed

  • I totally agree with you on this choice. 

  • Christ, you certainly think too high of yourself don't you? While I agree with many of your choices, I repeat, you're nobody to declare they are the worst in history. And the last part, with all the Sandra mockery? That was just immature, and I thought it was stupid. You don't like them? You're entitled to, and you're entitled to express you opinion. But don't go around declaring they're "God awful", cause not everyone thinks like you. Just because you say it, doesn't make it true

  • @125Dave8 I never said I thought highly of myself. This is an OPINION video! Look at the countless others that are made daily on YouTube.

  • @JasonMovieGuy: Dude, "Suddenly Last Summer" is laughably bad. You lost me with that one. And are we supposed to believe that you've seen every film that included a nominee for Best Actress?

  • @MultiRazorb: And "Little Women" sucked too.

  • @MultiRazorb If you think Sandra Bullock deserved to be Best Actress (which is his number one worst pic), YOU Have some serious mental issues. Fuck off.

  • @fusock: At what point did you deduce I said SB deserved to be Best Actress, asshat? I never said any such thing. Talk about mental issues...

  • Poor Sandra but it was bad enough her film got nominated for pest picture........Carey mulligan Or Gabourey Sedibe should of won.....

  • No Julia Roberts?

  • @jasonmovieguy - very interesting and thought provoking list, not just a clash of popular vs quality performance, the only part I'd disagree on is Cher in Moonstruck vs Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction...I believe 100% Glenn Close Should have an Oscar of her own, but for Dangerous Liaisons (she lost to another person on your list, Jodi Foster)

  • I just want everyone to know that on these videos everyone is biased because you always want your favorite to win so everyone just shut the hell up about who you think deserved it they didn't win because they were never ment to the sooner we all except that the better

  • Number 4 is the one I most agree with . Did you know that Judy Garland lost to Grace Kelly by 6 votes and all those votes were from MGM executives

  • Katherine Hepburn has 4 best Actress Oscars okay so she lost to Bette Davis I like her more anyway she was great in Dangerous

  • I disagree with Geraldine, Jodie, and Simone. Glenn should have won in 88, but Jodie's performance was great. The other two are extremeley deserving, though I need to rewatch Whoopi.

    Good choice for number one though!!!

  • I mean no disrespect but Jodie Foster did deserve the Academy Award.

  • I CANNOT BELIEVE that you missed out Renee Zellwegger for "Chicago" Roxy Hart was a villainous murderess who Renee, although a good actress, played as misunderstood and meek. Were there stage directions in the script that changed the character that is on display in ALL the stage versions!!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????­??!!!!!!!!! What about Helen Hunt in "As Good As It Gets" not the best by A GOOD MILE Judi Dench was robbed both years- the Gwyneth year and the Helen Hunt year

  • @LMTav Renee didnt win that year, Nicole won over her for The Hours. And Judi Dench did win in the Gwyneth Year

  • @LMTav

    Renée didn't win for "Chicago" (2002), Nicole Kidman did for "The Hours" (2002). Judi Dench wasn't nominated in the same category than Gwyneth Paltrow in 1998, and by the way, Judi did win for Supporting Actress...

    Greetings.

  • I completely agree with #1 and especially with #2 although I'd have the same reasons for both.

  • Spot one, but believe you forgot one - 2002 Renee in Chicago should have won over Nicole in the Hours - it will be an interesting contest this coming - hard call between your fave Meryl, Viola and Michelle

  • i so agree with #1

    

  • I agree with some. Others not so much. Catalina Sandino-Moreno should have won over Hilary Swank. Sally Kirkland should have won over Cher. And Marlee Matlin was most deserving that year. The rest I agree with. Good vid

  • Acting is not a competition

  • Hello? Halle Berry!

  • I totally agree with Sandra, but I'm surprised you didn't have Jennifer Hudson in "Dreamgirls". Rinko (in "Babel") should have won, tbh.

  • @queefstorm She won is surporting, this is for lead.

  • @queefstorm Jennifer Hudson won because the academy loves musicals and she killed it as Effie White not with her acting but with her singing look up "and i'm telling you I'm not going" its for singing that song the way she did thats why she won

  • Go and eat your heart. They won the award and you are an embittered internet nobody who has nothing to do so you post idiotic clips.

  • @Misteron20 If you don't like my videos, don't watch them. Idiot.

  • Katherine Hepburn totally deserved her Oscar. And even Cher did-I adore her performance in Moonstruck.

    WTF, how did Sandra Bullock beat all those others? Especially Carey Mulligan (for An Education)??

  • Helen Hunt was awesome as was Halle Berry. The worst film Ive ever seen is Black Swan and Portman's performance had me wanting to gauge my eyes out it was that much of a pain...and leave Lange alone, it was deserved all the way

  • Glenn CLose looks like shes going to finally win this year for albert nobbs. Streep wont even get the sentimental vote this year for yet another caricature. Its going to be Close....Glenn Close

  • I like #13 -- even Bette Davis admitted that Katharine Hepburn should have won that year.

  • Where is Mary Pickford, who basically bought her Oscar in 1929? Where is Helen Hunt, who won in 1997 at the expense of Judi Dench? Where is Claudette Colbert, who won instead of Bette Davis, who wasn't even nominated for Of Human Bondage in 1934? On the other hand, I find it hard to argue with a straight face that Geraldine Page should not have won over any of her competition.

  • you forgot REESE WITHERSPOON

    

  • I agree that Kate Winslet, Cate Blanchett and Merryl Streep should have won more often over the years... but still this video shows little respect, especially for the fantastic Sandra Bullock in the Blinde Side.

  • I watched the whole thing, and was thinking to myself "I haven't seen a single one of these movies..." BUT then I see the #1 worst, and I give this a huge thumbs up!

  • oh yeah, julie roberts,

  • you forgot halle berry, natalie portman, penelope cruz, sorry to say but nicole kidman for "the hours"!!!

  • @southernbrooklyngal Penelpe never own lead actress she won supporting. And the other three deserved it!

  • @southernbrooklyngal I know that and no the others didnt deserved them,  besides its MY opinion!

  • Helen Hunt should be on here for beating Dame Judi Dench, and that other actress who beat Gloria Swanson in Sunset Boulevard, and Bette Davis in All About Eve! What a travesty

  • I agree with Gwyneth Paltrow!! But I think Fernanda Montenegro deserved that oscar, not Cate Blanchett...

  • ummm have you seen all of these performances? i hate this list

  • And I fully agree about Sandra Bullock. I can't see anything Oscar-worthy about that performance. Even she knows she won because of her popularity and for no other reason.

  • You gotta be a Cher fanboy to think she deserved that Oscar... Glenn Close was a million times better.

  • I strongly disagree with Cher, she desreved her award over Glenn Close as a generic psycho !

  • Are you Kidding me??????? Cher deserved it and so did Sandra Bullock, and Bette Davis.

  • Sorry... Elizabeth Taylor instead of Simone Signoret I meant. I agree with the Judy Garland thing ;-)

  • I disagree with the biggest part of this. Elizabeth Taylor instead of Grace Kelly that year? Faye Dunaway instead of Katharine Hepburn? Winona Ryder instead of Jessica Lange??? I just agree with this on Cate Blanchett, Glenn Close instead of Cher or whoever instead of Sandra Bullock. And one more thing... I think it was Glenn Close who should have won in 1988, not Meryl Streep.

  • Carey Mulligan was fucking robbed.

  • Very bad choices,sorry i dislike this,nr.15 is the worst of them.

  • TODO ES CUESTION DE GUSTO,A MI JESSICA LANGE ME ENCANTO EN FRANCES.....

  • i would remove jodie foster from this list and add halle berry, julia roberts or helen hunt

  • @vadimzdonutube no halle was amazing...u can replace her with reese witherspoon

  • The timing with the screaming in the music at Sandra Bullock's win was hilarious! And I agree - by far the weakest of the nominees that year. Shouldn't have even been included in the group, and Meryl should've won.

  • Don't forget Halle Berry for Monster's Ball, Naomi Watts should have won for Mulholland Drive and she wasn't even nominated because the academy has a weird relationship with Lynch. You could also argue that Sissy Spacek should have won for In The Bedroom I guess.

  • @kevonmartini10 halle was amazing in that role...she deserved hers...naomi got nominated for better work in 21 GRAMS and sissy won for the right role in COAL MINER'S DAUGHTER

  • @kevonmartini10 Hallie Berry won it so get over it she was the first black actress to win it and I'm so very glad she did

  • #1 should have been Judy Holliday for Born Yesterday (should have won: either Bette Davis or Gloria Swanson) that was the greatest travesty ever...

  • i totally disagree with bette davis Cher and katherine heyburn! i really think that fay dunaway is one of the best actresses ever but i don't believe that her performance as bonnie was worth an oscar! katherine deserved it! and i also believe that kate winslet deserved an oscar fot titanic!

  • i think marlee matlin deserved her oscar, Weaver was good, but i think Marlee did deserve it

  • OK list, but I disagree wholeheartedly with Foster, Page, Hepburn, and Signoret. Even if you think there were better performances that year, those were *not* weak performances. And it surprised me to say this, because she's not one of my favorite actress, but Bullock probably doesn't belong there, either. Julia Roberts, on the other hand...

    Oh, and definitely good pick with Luise Rainer.

  • Jodie, Geraldine, and Simone do not belong here in my opinion. Grace is great, but I'm not angry about her being on here as much as the others, because Judy was absouletely robbed. But where's Ingrid Bergman in Anastasia?

  • FUCK OFF! Luise Rainer was FANTASTIC IN THE GOOD EARTH! She played a believable and relatable Chinese woman and no one could have done it better unless they were Chinese themselves. So you're wrong sir!

  • When Sandra Bullock won it pretty much meant that any one could win an oscar. An oscar became noting special the day she won.Sandra win still makes me mad that she beat such great actresses as Meryl Streep and Helen Mirren.

  • Signoret is one of the most deserved best actresses of the Hollywood history! Excellent decision of the academy, in 1959!

    Losted Reese Whiterspoon, who deserved was Felicity Huffman.

    2012 is the year of Glenn Close in "Albert Nobbs".

  • THANK YOU!!!! SANDRA BULLOCK, as much as i like her, WAS THE LEAST DESERVING OSCAR WINNER EVER!!!

  • HOw was Hilary Swanks award not deserved? I liked Kates part, but it wasnt better

  • @TaraAshleyTWILIGHT21 Well I liked Winslet much better. To me, Swank was just doing a repeat of what she did in "Boys Don't Cry"- poor white trash girl. It was okay, but aside Winslet, Staunton in "Vera Drake" was amazing, and Catalina Sandino Moreno in "Maria Full of Grace" also.

  • jodie foster deserved her oscar for the accused.

  • @5fing3rD3athPunch Not over her competition. Meryl Streep in "A Cry in the Dark" and Glenn Close in "Dangerous Liaisons" both are much stronger.

  • Have you actually watched all the Best Actress winners? If so, I can't imagine why you excluded Mary Pickford's performance in "Coquette".

  • pretty good and accurate list overall.

    Minor quibble though: I don't think Simone Signoret and Geraldine Page's wins are derided at all. In contrast, they both usually place amongst the best wins from what I've observed.

  • @kickofdeath Signoret I would say yes, Page- not at all. Though she was due in '85 from losing over and over again, her performance is easily the weakest of the nominees. She defeated, among others, Meryl Streep in "Out of Africa", Whoopi Goldberg in "The Color Purple" and Jessica Lange in "Sweet Dreams".

  • @JasonMovieGuy what crap, Page was brilliant and carried the whole movie

  • @kickofdeath Altoungh I think Simone Singoret´s perfotmance was very good Elizabeth Taylor was... there are no words to describe what she did that year. But Hollywood was more moved by personal circumstances than performances. Otherwise, Elizabeth Taylor would have won for this performance and for "Cat on a hot tin roof"

  • @andbor17 actually she's supposed to be amazing in the film. Don't see any future Sandra Bullock movies coming out screaming Oscar, do we?

  • @JasonMovieGuy Actually yes. Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. This year.

  • @JasonMovieGuy extremely loud and incredibly close is supposed to be expected for oscars

  • @JasonMovieGuy She's in a movie with Tom Hanks this Christmas about a young boy who loses his father in the 9/11 attacks and she in a movie called "GRAVITY" Her and George Clooney play astronauts stuck in space and Sandra is trying to get home to her son, like Apoolo 13, she might be in some Oscar movies. I can't believe you hate "THE BLIND SIDE" it was good

  • Totally agree with 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 12 & 14 :)

  • @GregNJ720 Ha, thanks!

  • Lol, any of the other nominees. Couldnt agree more! (Bullock did not deserved the nomination).

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more