Star Scientific's Muon Catalysed Fusion is everything Cold Fusion promissed to be but failed to deliver. AND Star Scientific understand how their process works. AND how to get consistent results. They use deuterium and produce NO Greenhouse Gases and NO Toxic waste.
Their energy is MUCH CHEAPER "could cost as little as 0.9c per Kilowatt" see blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath" July 01 post.
This is a very good presentation. I like how, even though he buys into cold fusion, he still criticizes Pons and Fleischman for jumping the gun. I read John Huizenga's "Cold Fusion, Scientific Fiasco of the Twentieth Century" which was the author's skeptical attempt at a debunking. After reading the book, I found myself MORE OPEN to the idea of cold fusion than I had been going into the book. I guess I felt Huizenga made the best case he could against...but it was still a weak case.
This has been flagged as spam show
Star Scientific's Muon Catalysed Fusion is everything Cold Fusion promissed to be but failed to deliver. AND Star Scientific understand how their process works. AND how to get consistent results. They use deuterium and produce NO Greenhouse Gases and NO Toxic waste.
Their energy is MUCH CHEAPER "could cost as little as 0.9c per Kilowatt" see blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath" July 01 post.
Website "Star Scientific Limited"
Youtube "In the Footsteps of Fusion" + channel
2110kop 5 months ago in playlist Cold Fusion
This is a very good presentation. I like how, even though he buys into cold fusion, he still criticizes Pons and Fleischman for jumping the gun. I read John Huizenga's "Cold Fusion, Scientific Fiasco of the Twentieth Century" which was the author's skeptical attempt at a debunking. After reading the book, I found myself MORE OPEN to the idea of cold fusion than I had been going into the book. I guess I felt Huizenga made the best case he could against...but it was still a weak case.
MrDanP1 7 months ago
The art of backpedaling
ParrhesiaJoe 1 year ago