This guy has no idea what hes talking about. Absolutely none. NASA discovered Nibiru way back in 1983.. and they've known about it ever since then. It's not in an "outbound" trajectory.. its in an 'inbound' trajectory. No idea where you got your information.. but its incorrect like most of the rest of these "nibiru videos".
@governmentexposure You can't READ, or have absolutely no reading comprehension. It's all there, links included. The title of the video is Planet-X ~ HARRINGTON. Are you saying all those old papers by HARRINGTON are bogus?
Planet-X is a term givin to unidentified planets or just unidentified objects if size is reasonable. On the account that it doesint match the orbit of what we are told...I don't think you're lookin at wormwood/murduk/nibiru/planet of the crossing.
@Tetrohedracon He doesn't have the correct cooridnates.. which is why hes not looking at the correct object. Which again, is why this video is incorrect.
@governmentexposure Those are HARRINGTON'S OWN coordinates. Look at the links shown in the video. You are stating outright lies, I don't like people who stoop that low.
@leefoflife everything u have researched or heard any info from anything is all talk BUT i have done the same calculations and he is right BUT ....i dont believe they descovered X because the last civilization back in 1623 a.d. to report with " fire from the sky and the giant destroyer wont be seen until it passes" ......there have been the rise N fall of man every where BUT every 3600 yrs or so why do they just vanish?
many celestial objects have been dubbed planet x in the past the incredibly ignorant have even called elenin planet x lol, but seriously there are so many different suggestions as to what or even where planet x is i was just wondered why you picked this particular one, i heard of an object thought to be 36k AU from the sun in the outer oort cloud that was purposed i dont know whats your take on this
Its easy to debunk planet x with old physics laws. What isn't easy to explain is the solar activity and extreme changes going on with saturn. Jupiter , Neptune and of course Earth.
The real planet X is Saturn. The game player X box 360? X=Saturn, The box or cube can be made out of the geosymetric hexagon on its north pole. and its rings are the 360 part. There are hundreds if not thousands of clues around that Saturn is planet X. Many times a double XX. It has many names. As for Nibiru and 2012. I make no predictions or comments. Its all fear based speculation anyway. Dont hold your breath.
@Zalobar WRONG. How can you be so ignorant?!?! I have photo copies from 1983 back when NASA discovered Nibiru.. so IMO, your either too narrow-minded to see the actual truth.. OR.. your part of the 'disinformation campaign'.. I'm betting on the narrow-minded theory. Go do some more research man.
I'm sorry but do you actually believe planet x exists? Explain this to me. How come NASA, amature astronomers have not found this planet? Oh because it does not exist. Its a hoax a scam. This was created to make a quick buck from the gullible by Nancy lieder. But some how since the planet x myth did not happen on 2003 it was moved to 2012. Thousands of books where published. I swear to god man get a life.
@AreYouHappyYet Again, THEY DID FUCKING FIND IT!! Please, people, before making yourself look stupid.. do research before opening your mouth about the subject would ya? I mean, that's all we ask of you. 1983 - NASA launched its infared satellite called 'IRAS' - The infared technology of that satellite, is what exposed Nibiru to the people at NASA. I have the fucking article from 1983 when they published it!!! For the love of God people.. please, do more research!!!
@governmentexposure You should DO some Research. You are repeating lies. Look at the 3rd link up above, and GO THERE. Note the "Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, co-investigator in the IRAS project, was interviewed and strongly stated that what IRAS had seen was not “incoming mail”, and READ the rest of the articles. I don't know where your getting your info, but I strongly suggest you READ the papers released by the principle investigators on the project.
@sereneyoshiko I first started making videos because I found it impossible to describe, on paper, how the Moon could do a stop and go pass over the Sun as seen by the SDO satellite. Many people couldn't believe that. It was much easier to show them, than to write a book about it. Then someone suggested making a video about the comet... I began using Starry Night back in the late 90s when I discovered how much easier it was to find Stars for Celestial Navigation using SN. Google Rude Starfinder.
I just watched a skyview video, and although they are a bit retarded at given data in a linear boring stream, they do have an interesting video on a Kuiper belt object, that may be...a brown dwarf, or a planet....if anyone is interested, you have to wade through their random weirdness for about 3 minutes before the get to it. Anyway, the coordinates for this object is 21H 13M 42.94 S the video is located here watch?v=Y3fIOetHjN0&feature=related OK hope everyone gets interested in astronomy LOL.
@somethingcomes I'm getting that trolled feeling. The 'position' you just gave is only half a position. Skyview removed all their videos when exposed as frauds. It is explained in the video above this here /watch?v=dXjh6cah5UE I find it impossible to think you are unaware of this. Choose you next post very carefully.
Can you look at other countries data about Planet X or are you only interested in the local viewpoint? Russia and Spain have other ideas and are at odds with the USA.
@somethingcomes Do you have a link to any reliable sources? All the reliable sources I know of have about the same viewpoint on Harrington's Planet X. It was a theory to explain perturbations that no longer existed after the Voyager 2 flyby. Please don't suggest a group such as Skyview, you might want to view a few things I've discovered about Skyview here: /watch?v=dXjh6cah5UE
@TBar1984 OK, I'll see if can retrace all the steps I took before when I gave everyone links to the Spain/Russia site and the mathematics...sigh. One thing is, everyone is randomly calling everything planet X, so it doesn't do any good to find the location of 'Planet X' since it is apparently everywhere, I think I saw it in my bathroom last week. I'm looking for brown/red dwarfs in our solar system, what they are called is anyone's guess. Apparently 2 have been found? Not sure...
@somethingcomes You might try to grasp the concept that the Planet X theory was devised to explain perceived perturbations with the outer planets. Those perceived perturbations disappeared after the data from Voyager 2 was analyzed. Therefore, if a large body were anywhere close, you would again need to see perturbations in the outer planets. There are no perturbations as verified by thousands of astronomers. Current theory is there may be something out around 15,000 AU. Not even close...
@TrueHamal Skyview are frauds. I have a GRAS 4 image of that area and there is nothing there that shouldn't be. The only Star field that could be identified from a Starview video was found to have been ripped off from a 2006 internet site. Look above for the links and watch this video /watch?v=h7NkR2G_HtQ
So what if this is accurate and "planet" ex is a failed star with planets or... a Large planet like Jupiter or Saturn with many moons, how far out would those orbit (hypathetically) and could these orbiting bodies be the reason there is so much confusion about planet x. People are seeing the moons which come deeper into the solarsystem and think those are planet x. a large planet coule have many moons.
@sereneyoshiko Planet X was theorized to explain the perturbations of Uranus & Neptune. Harrington quotes an article by Standish (1982a,b) in his 1988 article. Later, after the 1989 Voyager 2 flyby of Neptune, the same Standish, released another article in 1993 stating that Voyager's data revealed the correct mass of Neptune after which the need for Planet X disappeared. According to Harrington, the current position of X would be 110 AU out, any Jupiter type Moon would be within 0.3 AU of X.
@TBar1984 Thanks. Planet is a lose term that has no real definition. So this object could be anything. Dwarf star or a large asteroid (s) really. Isn't planet X supposed to be Planet: Eris? I saw some 1992 talk on the Kupier belt and outer solarsystem objects.... some... Mike brown I want to say. Not sure. Anyhow isn't that supposed to be planet X and then was named? or is that a popular mistake
@sereneyoshiko This video is about Harrington's Planet X which was well defined by Harrington in the articles above. You should read them. Also recommended reading are the articles at Wikipedia, and the references there, about Dwarf Planets, Mike Brown, and Planets beyond Neptune. Eris was discovered around the same distance, not location, of Harrington's Planet X. Eris is much smaller than Harrington's X, therefore, one would think if something larger were there, it would have been found.
Gosh, TBar, you are no fun at all ;-). Why couldn't you find the Nibiru thingy for us. Shoot! Still, i am befuddled with all the pictures that have been showing up of the double sun stuff. I don't know how that can happen, especially the ones that show double reflections on water surfaces. I know they are supposed to be optical flare artifacts, but somehow that just doesn't sell, given the pictures. Google search "images, double sun", if you will, as i suspect you already have.
@robertedwardfay ....some of that double sun stuff is also a phenomenon known as a sundog which you can see with the naked eye. Sometimes there will be one on each side of the sun, and they are usually the same distance above the horizon as the sun is. Another thing to note, this double sun stuff really took off when digital cameras came onto the scene. You can get all kinds of strange artifacts in general when you use digital cameras.
@tclift1670 Thanks for the info. I have heard of the Sun Dog thing AND that they generally were the same distance above the horizon, which is why the double sun pics i see are odd as they do not match up to that rule of thumb. I didn't know about the digital camera thing, though. This whole double sun thing is very problematic as it directs one's understanding to grasp at the idea that something celestial actually is going on. I wish there were more generalized public awareness and information.
two ppl thinks that planet x will hit earth, TBar, u put me at ease with youre's videos when i read about comets and astroides that some ppl think/tell that they gonna hit earth, keep up the good work ^^
This guy has no idea what hes talking about. Absolutely none. NASA discovered Nibiru way back in 1983.. and they've known about it ever since then. It's not in an "outbound" trajectory.. its in an 'inbound' trajectory. No idea where you got your information.. but its incorrect like most of the rest of these "nibiru videos".
governmentexposure 1 week ago
@governmentexposure You can't READ, or have absolutely no reading comprehension. It's all there, links included. The title of the video is Planet-X ~ HARRINGTON. Are you saying all those old papers by HARRINGTON are bogus?
Please READ before making FOOLS of yourselves.
TBar1984 1 week ago
Planet-X is a term givin to unidentified planets or just unidentified objects if size is reasonable. On the account that it doesint match the orbit of what we are told...I don't think you're lookin at wormwood/murduk/nibiru/planet of the crossing.
Tetrohedracon 4 weeks ago
@Tetrohedracon He doesn't have the correct cooridnates.. which is why hes not looking at the correct object. Which again, is why this video is incorrect.
governmentexposure 1 week ago
@governmentexposure Those are HARRINGTON'S OWN coordinates. Look at the links shown in the video. You are stating outright lies, I don't like people who stoop that low.
TBar1984 1 week ago
Cleveland from "Family Guy"
milkywaycenter 1 month ago
@leefoflife everything u have researched or heard any info from anything is all talk BUT i have done the same calculations and he is right BUT ....i dont believe they descovered X because the last civilization back in 1623 a.d. to report with " fire from the sky and the giant destroyer wont be seen until it passes" ......there have been the rise N fall of man every where BUT every 3600 yrs or so why do they just vanish?
couch1511 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
no proof no evidence just talk
leef0flife 3 months ago
many celestial objects have been dubbed planet x in the past the incredibly ignorant have even called elenin planet x lol, but seriously there are so many different suggestions as to what or even where planet x is i was just wondered why you picked this particular one, i heard of an object thought to be 36k AU from the sun in the outer oort cloud that was purposed i dont know whats your take on this
ArtworkbyMosier 4 months ago
Its easy to debunk planet x with old physics laws. What isn't easy to explain is the solar activity and extreme changes going on with saturn. Jupiter , Neptune and of course Earth.
4842Chuck 4 months ago
The real planet X is Saturn. The game player X box 360? X=Saturn, The box or cube can be made out of the geosymetric hexagon on its north pole. and its rings are the 360 part. There are hundreds if not thousands of clues around that Saturn is planet X. Many times a double XX. It has many names. As for Nibiru and 2012. I make no predictions or comments. Its all fear based speculation anyway. Dont hold your breath.
Zalobar 4 months ago
@Zalobar WRONG. How can you be so ignorant?!?! I have photo copies from 1983 back when NASA discovered Nibiru.. so IMO, your either too narrow-minded to see the actual truth.. OR.. your part of the 'disinformation campaign'.. I'm betting on the narrow-minded theory. Go do some more research man.
governmentexposure 1 week ago
I'm sorry but do you actually believe planet x exists? Explain this to me. How come NASA, amature astronomers have not found this planet? Oh because it does not exist. Its a hoax a scam. This was created to make a quick buck from the gullible by Nancy lieder. But some how since the planet x myth did not happen on 2003 it was moved to 2012. Thousands of books where published. I swear to god man get a life.
AreYouHappyYet 4 months ago
@AreYouHappyYet Again, THEY DID FUCKING FIND IT!! Please, people, before making yourself look stupid.. do research before opening your mouth about the subject would ya? I mean, that's all we ask of you. 1983 - NASA launched its infared satellite called 'IRAS' - The infared technology of that satellite, is what exposed Nibiru to the people at NASA. I have the fucking article from 1983 when they published it!!! For the love of God people.. please, do more research!!!
governmentexposure 1 week ago
@governmentexposure You should DO some Research. You are repeating lies. Look at the 3rd link up above, and GO THERE. Note the "Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, co-investigator in the IRAS project, was interviewed and strongly stated that what IRAS had seen was not “incoming mail”, and READ the rest of the articles. I don't know where your getting your info, but I strongly suggest you READ the papers released by the principle investigators on the project.
TBar1984 1 week ago
So why did you start making videos btw? out of no where just when people started talking about Elenin?
sereneyoshiko 4 months ago
@sereneyoshiko I first started making videos because I found it impossible to describe, on paper, how the Moon could do a stop and go pass over the Sun as seen by the SDO satellite. Many people couldn't believe that. It was much easier to show them, than to write a book about it. Then someone suggested making a video about the comet... I began using Starry Night back in the late 90s when I discovered how much easier it was to find Stars for Celestial Navigation using SN. Google Rude Starfinder.
TBar1984 4 months ago
I just watched a skyview video, and although they are a bit retarded at given data in a linear boring stream, they do have an interesting video on a Kuiper belt object, that may be...a brown dwarf, or a planet....if anyone is interested, you have to wade through their random weirdness for about 3 minutes before the get to it. Anyway, the coordinates for this object is 21H 13M 42.94 S the video is located here watch?v=Y3fIOetHjN0&feature=related OK hope everyone gets interested in astronomy LOL.
somethingcomes 4 months ago
@somethingcomes I'm getting that trolled feeling. The 'position' you just gave is only half a position. Skyview removed all their videos when exposed as frauds. It is explained in the video above this here /watch?v=dXjh6cah5UE I find it impossible to think you are unaware of this. Choose you next post very carefully.
TBar1984 4 months ago
Can you look at other countries data about Planet X or are you only interested in the local viewpoint? Russia and Spain have other ideas and are at odds with the USA.
somethingcomes 4 months ago
@somethingcomes Do you have a link to any reliable sources? All the reliable sources I know of have about the same viewpoint on Harrington's Planet X. It was a theory to explain perturbations that no longer existed after the Voyager 2 flyby. Please don't suggest a group such as Skyview, you might want to view a few things I've discovered about Skyview here: /watch?v=dXjh6cah5UE
TBar1984 4 months ago
@TBar1984 OK, I'll see if can retrace all the steps I took before when I gave everyone links to the Spain/Russia site and the mathematics...sigh. One thing is, everyone is randomly calling everything planet X, so it doesn't do any good to find the location of 'Planet X' since it is apparently everywhere, I think I saw it in my bathroom last week. I'm looking for brown/red dwarfs in our solar system, what they are called is anyone's guess. Apparently 2 have been found? Not sure...
somethingcomes 4 months ago
@somethingcomes You might try to grasp the concept that the Planet X theory was devised to explain perceived perturbations with the outer planets. Those perceived perturbations disappeared after the data from Voyager 2 was analyzed. Therefore, if a large body were anywhere close, you would again need to see perturbations in the outer planets. There are no perturbations as verified by thousands of astronomers. Current theory is there may be something out around 15,000 AU. Not even close...
TBar1984 4 months ago
What do you suppose happened to all the Skyview videos? They are GONE.
Imagine that. /user/00skyview
TBar1984 4 months ago
Planet X is in Aquarius at these coordinates: 22h03m53.36s , -12°28'31.2''. (Skyview Team Data).
TrueHamal 4 months ago
@TrueHamal Skyview are frauds. I have a GRAS 4 image of that area and there is nothing there that shouldn't be. The only Star field that could be identified from a Starview video was found to have been ripped off from a 2006 internet site. Look above for the links and watch this video /watch?v=h7NkR2G_HtQ
TBar1984 4 months ago
could you tell us where the G-spot is located? Us men would be thankful and our wifes would be too
jt55106 4 months ago
So what if this is accurate and "planet" ex is a failed star with planets or... a Large planet like Jupiter or Saturn with many moons, how far out would those orbit (hypathetically) and could these orbiting bodies be the reason there is so much confusion about planet x. People are seeing the moons which come deeper into the solarsystem and think those are planet x. a large planet coule have many moons.
sereneyoshiko 4 months ago
@sereneyoshiko Planet X was theorized to explain the perturbations of Uranus & Neptune. Harrington quotes an article by Standish (1982a,b) in his 1988 article. Later, after the 1989 Voyager 2 flyby of Neptune, the same Standish, released another article in 1993 stating that Voyager's data revealed the correct mass of Neptune after which the need for Planet X disappeared. According to Harrington, the current position of X would be 110 AU out, any Jupiter type Moon would be within 0.3 AU of X.
TBar1984 4 months ago
@TBar1984 Thanks. Planet is a lose term that has no real definition. So this object could be anything. Dwarf star or a large asteroid (s) really. Isn't planet X supposed to be Planet: Eris? I saw some 1992 talk on the Kupier belt and outer solarsystem objects.... some... Mike brown I want to say. Not sure. Anyhow isn't that supposed to be planet X and then was named? or is that a popular mistake
sereneyoshiko 4 months ago
@sereneyoshiko This video is about Harrington's Planet X which was well defined by Harrington in the articles above. You should read them. Also recommended reading are the articles at Wikipedia, and the references there, about Dwarf Planets, Mike Brown, and Planets beyond Neptune. Eris was discovered around the same distance, not location, of Harrington's Planet X. Eris is much smaller than Harrington's X, therefore, one would think if something larger were there, it would have been found.
TBar1984 4 months ago
Show me a chart that NASA has nothing to do with then I may believe you.
jnrmack 4 months ago
I love your videos. I have learned so much from them. Thanks for the greater perspective.
thoughtvstruth 4 months ago
"Where's the beef?" Haha, all the fear mongers are false prophets. They better repent.
boldforjesus 4 months ago
Gosh, TBar, you are no fun at all ;-). Why couldn't you find the Nibiru thingy for us. Shoot! Still, i am befuddled with all the pictures that have been showing up of the double sun stuff. I don't know how that can happen, especially the ones that show double reflections on water surfaces. I know they are supposed to be optical flare artifacts, but somehow that just doesn't sell, given the pictures. Google search "images, double sun", if you will, as i suspect you already have.
robertedwardfay 4 months ago
@robertedwardfay ....some of that double sun stuff is also a phenomenon known as a sundog which you can see with the naked eye. Sometimes there will be one on each side of the sun, and they are usually the same distance above the horizon as the sun is. Another thing to note, this double sun stuff really took off when digital cameras came onto the scene. You can get all kinds of strange artifacts in general when you use digital cameras.
tclift1670 4 months ago
@tclift1670 Thanks for the info. I have heard of the Sun Dog thing AND that they generally were the same distance above the horizon, which is why the double sun pics i see are odd as they do not match up to that rule of thumb. I didn't know about the digital camera thing, though. This whole double sun thing is very problematic as it directs one's understanding to grasp at the idea that something celestial actually is going on. I wish there were more generalized public awareness and information.
robertedwardfay 4 months ago
You're a ray of sunshine in a black hole of insanity TBar...fantastic job:P
kelter1027 4 months ago
LOL thanks now how do we send the good old boys club to live on X
ladycress 4 months ago
two ppl thinks that planet x will hit earth, TBar, u put me at ease with youre's videos when i read about comets and astroides that some ppl think/tell that they gonna hit earth, keep up the good work ^^
MidNight8181 4 months ago
Nice. Great Job. Thanks
Richiesmad 4 months ago
Nice! Now I dare you to make one of Elenin as a Black Hole! haha!
isabstmr 4 months ago
LOVE this! Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!
SynthPl7 4 months ago
bravo!
Lightbulbette 4 months ago
Excellent work TB...
DrakenI78 4 months ago
@ 2:30..."soooo, where's the beef?" LMAO, you couldn't have said it better. OUTSTANDING JOB TBar!!!
tclift1670 4 months ago
Great job thank you :).
jeremyjabber 4 months ago
Reality is a wonderful thing, but I can't wait to hear the tin foil hat spin on this..lol.
Trixiegirl88 4 months ago
Dr. Harrington's willingness to go out and look for this planet while at NASA then was admirable. He died too young. A good man.
dunskie 4 months ago
Interesting view.
Thank's.
TheFifaJay 4 months ago
Hey dude, how do i get that fantastic info on my screen???
kennykunt 4 months ago