@jfabris I guess you don't realize a corporatocracy what this country already has.
Obama's first two chiefs of staff were a passport carrying Israeli citizen and a banker from Morgan Stanley. His third is another Jew who managed a hedge fund that bet on the housing market collapse. Some "Hope and Change" Obama is a puppet of warmongering zionist bankers just like the GOP.
And within two weeks of this, he is cutting Paul off during interviews. Im sure his bosses threatened his career, but I wish this man could have stood by his apparent convictions.
I believe Ron Paul DID win that Iowa caucus... Did you hear about all the "computer glitches" and "lost vote counts" that supposedly happened in Iowa? Yes, it's true.... That being said, this reporter, Neil Cavuto is absolutely reporting ETHICALLY and he's right.. Reporters are there to report the FACTS not FABRICATIONS nor their PERSONAL OPINIONS...
Keep it up, media! Every time you libel & slander Ron Paul, people look him up, and he gains support. Every time you bloat the asinine assertion that he "can't" win, people look him up, and he gains support. When you ignore him, people wonder why, look him up, and he gains support. You can't win either way, can you? When you call him a racist, Black Americans are laughing at you, every time you call him a homophobe, homosexual Americans laugh at you, because they know better!
Neil has seen the Judge's ratings surge and wants a piece of the action!!!!!!!! unfortunately Neil may end up in a body bag from the powers that be for telling the truth......
"We in our business. In my business." Exactly. You have a special role of great influence. You have a duty to honor the trust people grant to you, even though they may do it unwittingly. At the end of the day, you must earn a profit, but you must be an organization that can remain profitable. Honor the trust of the people today and you will reap great profits among this generation. Keep it coming!
I think Iowa's governor should surrender all the votes HE got when he was elected, then, too, and step down from his office, because the voice of the people should clearly be ignored. Right?
Trolls attempt to try to keep people caught in conversations that don't really address the video (Which is Ron Paul) Not whether I am 21 or not and also not whether Paul supporters are all conspiracy theorists. Why don't you try talking about the issues that he is always trying to address?
iowa's gov.. fail. iowa residents.. you know who you want..don't let your govenor decide for you. he is a tool for the establishment. Ron Paul is the real deal. vote for him if you cherish the title that has been given to you.."salt of the earth'. otherwise.. you'll be lumped in with the rest of the ignorant republican yuppies who are clearly scared of Ron Paul becoming the president.
Wow, well I stand corrected. I thought Neil hated Paul because he always looked in pain when people applaused him or when he interviewed him. I think Paul will win all the way. He is bringing out the truth about others track records and they are really antsy over that, beside the fact that he threatens the thrones that Washington has built for themselves.
A sincere thanks to Neil. I don't know if is inclined to vote for Ron Paul, but I appreciate the few people in media who respect the charter of the media and don't try to black out candidates. That goes the for the crazy loon socialist candidates too. In America, we're supposed to listen, and choose for ourselves, not for others.
Cavuto is fair with Ron, and always has been. I think Shep is too. I know the Judge and Stossel are. Cavuto and the Judge and Stossel are bucking their boss, Roger Aiels, but it is nice to hear Cavuto telling OReilly to shut up! Bill O has no more cerdibility...he doesnt give a damn about "the folks". If he did, he would keep his mouth shut and allow the voters to pick, instead of trying to sway the election. OReiley is a fraud.
Bless you MR.Neil Cavuto for your standing up to the corporate media smear that seems to be running amuck at Fox and other cable news shows against DR.Ron Paul!Moreover;that it is your employer that you took on!Yes.Ron Paul has an army of people that know he is the genuine artical and is ready for The Oval office!Thanks!
I love neil cavuto. There are only 3 that I will listen to. The first 2 are Neil and Judge Andrew Napolitano. The third guy worth listening to is John Stossel. The guys you don't want to ever listen to are Bill OReilly, Krauthammer, and so on...too many to list.
Any man hated by the system and status quo as much as Ron Paul, has to be good, legitimate and absolutely necessary to bring down the corrupt corporatocracy we have.
Ron Paul will win the popular vote in the general election of 2012. However, I'm not convinced that will be enough for him to become president....sad but true. I will hope for the best ( a Ron Paul Presidency ) and prepare for the worst ( 1984 by George Orwell ). I pray that the powers that be will humble themselves and retake their sanity. Hopefully, for their sake, they will... otherwise they will surely wake the sleeping lion that is the free people of the world.
@RWT683 I see no factual evidence of the Koch Brothers hating Ron Paul. The only information I find on the subject is from Ron Paul disciples posted on comment boards like these. Ron Paul is the Koch Brothers wet dream; no government to stop them from world domination.
@jfabris What you just stated is a non sequitur. You find no evidence that something isn't, therefore it is. No, that's not the way it works. You can't prove something that doesn't exist.
The last think Wall Street kingpins want is a Paul victory because that will mean an end to the limitless risk-free gambling they are able to do while getting taxpayers to cover their debts when they lose. Read up on the Fed and how their policies benefit the rich and steal money out of your pocket.
and are not already registered as a Republican, you have missed your chance to vote for Ron Paul. Sorry sleepy heads. The registration deadline has passed in those states. Those of you in the remaining states had better move now.
Neil is the only one on Fox that has a clue. The only one that delivers fair and balanced news. The rest of them should be on The View, since they like to shove their opinions down the throats of Americans so much.
its amazing, they say "if he wins iowa, its no big, lots of candidateds have won iowa and lost.." then they turn around and say somthing totally different when gingrich or romney look like theyre doin good in iowa... its such a big deal for them!!!
Winner of remaining caucuses, becomes our President!
Removes the thiefs, reverses bull-shit fake laws by o-boy group, put all associated with o-boy and bush into jails, shuts down soros his group, axelrod"s group as well,etc,etc!
Ron Paul would bring about as much real change to this country as can be brought, short of armed revolution, but nobody will go to jail. That's crossing a line he can't cross.
Notice also he is campaigning now on "Audit the Fed" instead of End the Fed. He never says End the Fed anymore. He knows how far he can go without physically putting himself in danger. (which he still could be.) I still would do anything to get him elected.
@RWT683 Actually your understanding of his position is distorted. He knows you can't just close the FED in one day, so he wants to introduce competing currencies, and eventually faze out the Fed. he has never said to just close down the Fed in one day.
But you may be right, a real bloody revolution may be the only thing that will bring about change. Let's hope that never happens.
@gold95 From the perspective of the bankers and all those who profit from this system, "phasing out" the Fed is just as bad as ending it outright. I hope Ron Paul will do it. But he has backed off somewhat on the anti-Fed rhetoric. (Focuses on the Fed's bad policies instead of the Fed as a system)
As far as competing currency JFK was the last to try that (silver backed US Notes). In the internet age & with the awareness people now have, let's hope Ron Paul is more successful. Ron Paul 2012.
@RWT683 Correction: I mixed up silver certificates and US notes which were not the same thing. And they were issued before Kennedy. So really AFAIK no president since the Fed Act was passed has stood up to the Fed.
@RWT683 Classical economics theories like quantity theory of money have been replaced by Keynesian economics a long time ago. Most inflation is demand side, not supply, and aggregate demand and aggregate supply are not in equilibrium instantaneously since prices are sticky in the short run. Flexibility occurs in the long run, and to assume all money supplies are transactional is ridiculous, it ignores savings. It's money demand that's important. I don't care what Ron Paul book you read.
@WallStwizkid What savings? The trillions in gold held by central banks while they preach to us that it's worthless (here take this paper!), or the rapidly depreciating savings of the working and middle class stolen through central bankers controlling monetary policy?
I do not agree 100% with the Austrians. However we do not have real Keynesianism today. Read "Debunking Economics." Ron Paul is still smarter and more honest than any of those puppet whore POS running against him.
@RWT683 Sorry, but the Great Depression was triggered by a deflationary spiral, as the Federal Reserve at the time contracted the money supply, when they should've expanded it, which they couldn't extend credit because the exchange was fixed with gold. This is a documented fact. Those of us that actually took economics and/or work in the financial industry know this, regardless of what silly libertarian book you read by Ron Paul.
And those of you who "work in the financial industry" only know you are robbing and defrauding the world blind, and lately, so do we. (Maybe you don't... you seem to be an idiot who believes his own lies.) Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, B of A, etc are all insolvent. Your securities, your loans, and your stock is worthless, and the whole world knows this. So enjoy the party while it lasts, because eventually the people will make you foot the bill.
@WallStwizkid I forgot to add the only thing that keeps stock prices up is 600 billion a year in laundered drug money added onto your bottom line. (Why won't they wipe out the opium crop in Afghanistan again? The coke in Columbia?) Your whole profession is 1000 times more criminal than the guy who holds up 7-eleven for $100 of crack money. He goes to prison but you keep stealing millions.
@RWT683 Wow that's pretty funny, considering I don't work for Goldman Sachs or Morgan Stanley and I never said anything about the bailouts, I was against them, as were most people out here, because that's obviously not Capitalism. I love how you come at me with media fueled hate, that's mature.
@WallStwizkid Hey you initiated a conversation with me, referencing stuff I didn't even comment about, and with a bad attitude. So consider it a return on investment.
@RWT683 It doesn't really matter about debating true Keynesian schools of thought, what's important here is the way Keynes' viewed inflation. He challenged the quantity theory of money with money demand. If you make $10grand in one week and don't spend a dime, your money didn't touch prices. To assume a direct and proportionate link between inflation rates and money supply expansion, you'd have to assume the whole supply is transactional. That's ridiculous, it's not.
@RWT683 This is why more and more modern economists are redefining inflation to mean a general increase in price levels, measured through the CPI index. Only Austrian schools of though still adhere to quantity theory. What about trade deficits? That actually helps money supply expansion because it provides price competition from goods beyond the current supply. I'm afraid monetary inflation is a supply side cause that doesn't always hold weight, depending on other variables.
@RWT683 By the way, now that I think about it. Why don't you explain to me how that libertarian market fairy works again. The Great Depression is a good example to show that the Ron Paul market fairy is as real as Santa Clause. I'm curious as to why demand didn't induce on falling prices before the 29 crash. Could it be that people aren't cattle,and don't respond to market conditions like clockwork? Could it be the economy isn't as mechanized as Rob Paul thinks?
@RWT683 Yeah, it could be. Because that's what happened. That's just like saying "low interest rates will always induce borrowing." Really? Ever heard of a liquidity trap? It depends on various other variables. If interest rates are low coupled in with threats of prolonged deflation, even at zero percent on a loan, 3% deflation a year, real rates suppress borrowings. Demand deficient unemployment is another example that mechanized equilibrium doesn't always occur.
@WallStwizkid You want me to respond to your theoretical scenario like I am a worshiper of Austrian Econ. I already said I do not 100% agree with it. Like for example in Man, Economy and the State Rothbard basically says monopolies and a monopoly price can't exist. I find that ludicrous. I support Ron Paul primarily for his foreign policy, and his Econ policy cannot possibly do as much damage as Wall Street and the Fed has already done to this country since we entered the era of free fiat money.
@RWT683 Well I don't agree with the last half of your last comment, but I do agree with you on monopolies. I don't hate on monopolies, I admire them, as long as they're legitimate. Goldman Sachs is not legitimate, and should've failed and been replaced.
@WallStwizkid I don't see how you can admire a monopoly. Maybe you admire whatever maximizes profit. But even Keynes said all his theory was aimed at maximizing employment. Monopolies hurt people, they eliminate price discovery and obviously if nobody can enter the market, that has to hurt employment.
@RWT683 I happen to agree with Chairman Bernanke's economic views, but I'm really in no place to comment as to whether or not he practices them. I'm not exactly defending individuals here, I'm merely defending the economy's need for a central banking influence. I'm not defending individual Federal Reserve board governors. It's kind of like saying "well the president is corrupt so we should just abolish the presidency." That's my main point here.
@WallStwizkid I actually tend to think there should be a central bank, but it should NOT be privately owned and controlled. That is the problem with the Fed. In most countries the central bank is gov't owned. So you could say I differ from Ron Paul there. I do believe in the gold standard because it is the only thing that can bring spending and deficits under control.
@RWT683 I think it should be privately owned, because the financial industry is private industry. I don't think they should be above audits though, nor do I think they should shrug off Congress, since it is Congress with the authoring to delegate monetary authority. I think a balance is important, I try not to have extremist thoughts on either side. Socialism is extreme, but libertarian free market ideas are extreme as well, on the other side of the spectrum.
@RWT683 Ron Paul is funny with that. He's so focused on abolishing the Federal Reserve, often citing reasons regarding regulatory control, yet at the same time he'll support private industry. I think that's going to be a weakness for him if he's nominated. Not everyone is well versed in economics. You may understand his position, but the average voter will most likely be confused.
@WallStwizkid My main point with Keynesian models, is the way he categorized inflation. Most people discuss inflation generally, without labels. There's demand-pull inflation, cost-push, stagflation, hyperinflation etc..even deflation could be demand side or credit deflation etc, and all individually have different variables interacting with them, and it could get pretty deep.
@WallStwizkid The difference is you are looking at it as just inflation, i.e. price increase, while Paul is looking at it as depreciation of the currency. Look at different hyperinfations that have occurred throughout history. To say that the quantity of money will not affect prices is pretty obtuse. In point of fact it is the value of money that primarily determines prices. And no fiat currency has ever lasted, John Jesus Christ Keynes not withstanding.
@WallStwizkid For example, let's say there's an oil spill or war in the middle east which disrupts the petrodollars market and/or shipping. So here you have an inverted market of higher spot prices, no storage. That's going to be bearish on the dollar, driving up gold prices. So here you have all these pockets of inflation, yet root cause lies outside of monetary policy. It may result in too much money on a smaller amount of goods, yet it was not triggered by any type of easing.
@WallStwizkid Well yes I concede there can be many causes of inflation. However I don't think you'll convince me that the *primary* cause, right now in reality and not in some theoretical scenario, is monetary policy and the private banker owned Fed's control over that policy.
@WallStwizkid I think it's kind of funny you think the Fed should be private because Wall St is private, but you think they should dictate (or can even know) how much money people need and not the market. Why should any private entity have that much power?
Most business professors I knew in college said Econ is not a science. It is a priori where real science is a posteriori. Of course the Econ profs protested.
@RWT683 I completely disagree with that, I've never had an economics professor say it's not a science. You're actually saying a bachelor of science degree program in economics contains professors who state it's not a science...lol.
@WallStwizkid I said business professors said it was not a science. Not econ profs.The reason it is unlike other sciences is economists, whether it's Keynes, von Hayek, Smith, et al are creating a theory and trying to find evidence to support that theory. Real science, like physics, takes evidence and constructs a theory from it. You know what will happen in physics. All Econ is just our best guess about what is really happening. Ultimately we can't predict what people will choose, just guess.
@RWT683 So, that is proof right there that you saying we know exactly what will happen in particle physics isn't really true. Keynes developed theory during the great depression. Keynes looked at economic conditions as evidence and then developed the theory based on this evidence, which is obviously contested. However, there are areas of other sciences that are contested as well. Do all scientists agree on everything? Global warming debate? There's many examples that they don't.
@WallStwizkid About the average voter you are probably right. Most people in the country had no idea what the Federal Reserve was until Ron Paul got on TV, even though it is printed on every goddamn dollar in their wallets. He does seem to be doing well in Iowa though. If they do not vote for him all I can say is they must enjoy zionist-banker rule.
@RWT683 Oh sorry, you did say that. My point is, I'm not saying Keynes had everything nailed precisely. Most of Keynes's points, as well as mine, are aimed at the fact that no, you can't predict other people's behavior because the economy, like the people that comprise it, is not robotic. Which is why I support a central bank, which I guess you agree with, we just disagree on the authority of the bank.
@WallStwizkid Mainly I think there needs to be regulation of the financial sector. And to that end the revolving door between Wall St and DC must be closed. The financial sector has shown repeatedly they cannot be trusted to go it "lassiez faire." However if Mom & Pop want to open a shoe shop on Main St., there should be little to no regulation. Free Market works to a point then you have to watch for monopolies. Not saying Ron Paul believes this, it's just what I believe.
@RWT683 I didn't expect you to contest anything. I enjoy a challenge, but only from people that know what they're talking about of course. I like debating economics with people of different views. I wasn't sending these messages thinking you're going to eventually say "oh wow you're so right what was I thinking." You obviously have your opinion, and I have mine. In the end we're both just supporting theories from different schools of thought.
@RWT683 My main problem with the Austrian school of thought, and Ron Paul is a testament to this, is they introduce theories as if it were a precise fact. If you look at their quantity theory of money, it's a good example. If you look at marginal utility components and the use of mathematical bi-conditional logical connectives, there's still a margin of error, although marginal rates of substitution in consumption and transformation in production doesn't necessarily have to be accurate
@RWT683 Cardinal and ordinal utilities doesn't have to be spot on to serve a purpose either. Point is, Ron Paul, like most libertarians, state theory as fact. He does this every time he mentions the free market patching things up. I support Keynesian economics because Keynes's motivation was to display inaccuracies in classical economics views,and develop a theory that developed more possibilities and deeper analysis, which I feel evolved economics.
@RWT683 Look at the 1870s. There was supply glut and price/wage deflation, yet the money supply expanded 2.6% annually throughout the decade. So, again, the market fairy didn't swoop in. As far as science goes, that's not entirely true. A hypothesis in and of itself is an educated guess, which is tested. When it comes to matter, we know properties of about 4-5% of existing forms. That's one part in 20. Anti-gravitating dark matter expanding the universe we know nothing about.
@WallStwizkid I think the point I was making was Econ operates on the admission that we cannot know everything. I merely used physics as an example; classical physics was based on everything being discoverable and going from effects to causes. A lot of Econ theory goes from cause to effect.
I am open to a limited power central bank, however i think gold would at least restrain limitless credit and the resulting bubbles.
I'm getting tired... I'm calling it a night but thanks for the discussion
@RWT683 Last point. Most of the analysis I do is technical, yet I don't ignore economic data. The market would kill any investor that just looked at economic data if it's trading technically, and vice verse. Economics should be introduced with a point Keynes made- it's not about which girl you think is the prettiest, it's about which girl you think other people think is the prettiest, and then it's about which girl you think other people think other people think is the prettiest.
@RWT683 I think if people kept that in mind before diving into economics they'd understand better. Austrian theory has evidence. Keynesians have evidence. The difference is, Keynes never entirely dismissed Austrian theory, he simply evolved economics into other possibilities, which is what I like about him.
@RWT683 Oh by the way, I'm going to close with something a little off topic. I'm obviously not a Ron Paul supporter, but here's a heads up. Ron Paul, if he actually gets nominated, is going to face a really big challenge. That challenge is going to come from the fact he's affiliated with crazy conspiracy theorists. It's going to destroy him easily. They think most people support their lunacy, but that's not even close.
@WallStwizkid Like people that support him are conspiracy theorists and that's going to destroy him. Just because we don't believe in the status quo anymore and KNOW the government is corrupt enough to pull ANYTHING doesn't make us Con. Theorists.
@dolittleskippy It doesn't make you conspiracy theorists, if it were actually true. Saying the Gov. is "corrupt enough to pull anything" is the same as saying the Gov. is willing to conspire against the interests of the people. That's an outrageous claim and should be supported by even more outrageous evidence. If you had that evidence, it would be conspiracy, but not a theory. It would be fact. But, you don't have it, therefore it's a conspiracy theory.
@WallStwizkid I have lots of proof but I would have to send you all over the place to get it. I like to think that people with the net are capable of researching stuff on their own. But for starters if you like watch some of the videos by Charlotte Iserbyt on youtube. She wrote "The deliberate dumbing down of America" Some people can't be convinced of anything no matter what though so I have stopped trying too hard to do so.
@dolittleskippy How old are you? I'm guessing under 21. Looking things up on google or youtube isn't "researching." I can find websites online that think President Obama is Osama Bin Laden. There's 50,000 people that actually think Elvis isn't dead. There were people that though the U.S. was conspiring a world government with the Soviet Union. Only problem was, the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. The it was the UN, then the CFR. It goes on and on. None of this is real.
@dolittleskippy *there were people that thought...I meant to say. Point is, nothing you find on google or youtube or anywhere else on the internet is proof of anything. Don't be so gullible, conspiracy theorists at the top of the chain know it's all crap and sell people like you. Don't be a sucker.
@WallStwizkid I told you to learn about Charlotte Iserbyt. She has traveled and lived all over the world, worked for Reagan on the US State Dept, was senior advisor for the OERI Dept of Ed. She was born around 1930 and grew up in a highly educated family. (Yale) I have read her books so please stop acting like the web is the only source of info. I am an avid reader and have been for about 48 years. I also read books by Ron Paul, Rush Limpbrains and as far the other direction as Howard Stern.
@RWT683 They think they're doing him a favor, but if they really want him to win, they should shutup. It's going to doom him. Anyway, nice talking to you. Take care.
@RWT683 Or, what if there is easing, yet increased spending on imports. The trade deficit provides price competition beyond domestic supply. Couple that in with an increase in savings, and you're not going to see a proportionate link between monetary expansion and inflation rates. While I do agree monetary inflation exists as one form, it's not really a short run impact since prices are usually sticky. There's a lag in flexibility between the initial easing and it's impacts on prices.
@WallStwizkid You keep mentioning savings like people actually have any. Look at reality, not theory. This country is bankrupt thanks to current econ theory. Earlier you said if I get a 10,000 check and save it how would it affect price. It wouldn't but who the heck does that? When people get a loan it's because they need the money. End consumers don't get a loan and put it back in the bank. They spend it. Hence inflation.
@WallStwizkid And if I am not mistaken both the First and Second Bank of the United States were also privately owned. We have never had a true state central bank in this country.
@RWT683 His original thoughts were aimed at unemployment. However, "theory of general employment, interest and money" addressed and challenged the quantity theory of money. Employment is tied in to the same concept, because his summary in terms of unemployment basically addressed demand deficient unemployment, where the market reaches equilibrium when the different between nominal wages and real wages disappear. This of course is navigated by a central bank, so it all ties in some way.
@RWT683 I'm beginning to think certain youtube users are mentally retarded. They're reading books by Ron Paul, thinking they know economics. My 5 year old niece is smarter than that. If you message me continuing the same old stupidity, you're blocked.
@RWT683 You should read "End THe Fed" Even in that book he does not advocate closing it down in one day. Unless you can provide a source where he would close it in one day.
@gold95 I have read it. Just saying he has stopped using the phrase "end the fed" in the last few months. So he has toned it down slightly. Not saying he no longer wants to end the Fed, and I hope he does end it.
About time someone on FoxNews at least reports objectively. Like him or not, it's time to just LET THE PEOPLE VOTE!! Rather than calling him a kook or unelectable or saying he's bad because of Iran or whatever. Talk about why you think some other candidate is better for the American people and ask yourself, what's so bad about exposing the white collar criminals that have absolutely destroyed trust in the system causing small business to hang onto their money instead of invest in the future
Thanks Neil for speaking facts. When will we get real journalism again? Use to be that the media would simply report the news instead of trying to 'Make the News.' Americans are sick of 'Status Quo' politicians and the crony capitalistic oligarchy. Mainstream Media is a big part of this and Americans know it. America is waking up! America will vote Ron Paul!
Thank you Neil for speaking up, that the media should be neutral and accurate in it's presentation of anyone running for office. Success is showing up in a rainstorm when know one else will. It is not up to the media or elites to vote for us and as Ron Paul said the other night..."So much for Democracy, as long as Democracy goes their way". This video puts you above the rest.
I STRONGLY URGE WE E-MAIL DR.PAULS CAMPAIGN MANAGERS/WEBSITES ENMASSE, TO PLEAD WITH HIM TO MAKE A INDEPENDENT RUN, AS THE GOP HAS BASICALLY ADMITTED THEY WILL IGNORE RON PAUL IF HE WINS IOWA CAUCUS, AND FOCUS ON ROMNEY/GENGRICH. THE FIX, ONCE AGAIN, IS IN. I DON'T UNDERSTAND PEOPLES WILLINGNESS TO SHRUG OFF THE CONSTITUTION. WE ARE AT A CRITICAL TIME IN OUR COUNTRY. IF WE CONTINUE DOWN THIS ROAD, AMERICA WILL BE DESTROYED FROM WITHIN. ANYONE WHO HAS WEBSITES TO EMAIL PLZ POST LETS DO THIS PPL!
I forgive you, Neil, for complying with some antipauletism in the past. I know you are being allowed to save some face now that it is clear that Ron Paul will Win Iowa and Bill O'Reilly mentally prepares himself for writing apology letters and resigning . As disclosure nears I look forward to public figures forgiving themselves and spreading the word of truth and love. It's barely the beginning. But the unstoppable vision is shared by the youths of the world and it is done!
If you guys watch Outfoxed, you'll see why Neil is probably forced to ask questions and push agendas that he doesn't even want to. I feel bad for some of them who look like they want to get over to a medium where they can say how the REALLY feel. I would love to hear Neil uncensored :P
While I appreciate any message that is positively portrayed for Ron Paul, Cavuto is a snake that says nice things on his show but is a huge ass to Paul during the debates.
Ron Paul is a zealot who wants to end democracy in favor of Corporatocracy.
jfabris 1 week ago
@jfabris I guess you don't realize a corporatocracy what this country already has.
Obama's first two chiefs of staff were a passport carrying Israeli citizen and a banker from Morgan Stanley. His third is another Jew who managed a hedge fund that bet on the housing market collapse. Some "Hope and Change" Obama is a puppet of warmongering zionist bankers just like the GOP.
Ron Paul is the only one who is incorruptible.
RWT683 1 week ago
And within two weeks of this, he is cutting Paul off during interviews. Im sure his bosses threatened his career, but I wish this man could have stood by his apparent convictions.
noobishmacgaming 1 week ago
CAVUTO- FRAUD AND COWARD!
CNNANDFOXSUCK 1 month ago
@music4all80 Could you give me a link to your article? I couldn't find it by searching... Thx!
kastnmagic 1 month ago in playlist More videos from gold95
I believe Ron Paul DID win that Iowa caucus... Did you hear about all the "computer glitches" and "lost vote counts" that supposedly happened in Iowa? Yes, it's true.... That being said, this reporter, Neil Cavuto is absolutely reporting ETHICALLY and he's right.. Reporters are there to report the FACTS not FABRICATIONS nor their PERSONAL OPINIONS...
kastnmagic 1 month ago in playlist More videos from gold95
THANK YOU NEIL
lisas44 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep it up, media! Every time you libel & slander Ron Paul, people look him up, and he gains support. Every time you bloat the asinine assertion that he "can't" win, people look him up, and he gains support. When you ignore him, people wonder why, look him up, and he gains support. You can't win either way, can you? When you call him a racist, Black Americans are laughing at you, every time you call him a homophobe, homosexual Americans laugh at you, because they know better!
Eye2EyeIIIV 1 month ago
well said sir *tips his hat*
KlingonSpider 2 months ago
Neil has seen the Judge's ratings surge and wants a piece of the action!!!!!!!! unfortunately Neil may end up in a body bag from the powers that be for telling the truth......
DowellForPASenate 2 months ago
Neil Cavuto, you've earned my respect for defending truth!
Eye2EyeIIIV 2 months ago
I think this is the only video on the internet that involves fox news talking about ron paul that has more thumbs up than down....
303MMJ 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"We in our business. In my business." Exactly. You have a special role of great influence. You have a duty to honor the trust people grant to you, even though they may do it unwittingly. At the end of the day, you must earn a profit, but you must be an organization that can remain profitable. Honor the trust of the people today and you will reap great profits among this generation. Keep it coming!
butlmat 2 months ago
Comment removed
butlmat 2 months ago
Good to see honest journalism
81tystacks 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I think Iowa's governor should surrender all the votes HE got when he was elected, then, too, and step down from his office, because the voice of the people should clearly be ignored. Right?
PistolPackingPatriot 2 months ago
They are going to fire Cavuto just like they did Alan Colmes.
shintaiden 2 months ago 5
Who gives a shit what they say.
dicemanace 2 months ago
Trolls attempt to try to keep people caught in conversations that don't really address the video (Which is Ron Paul) Not whether I am 21 or not and also not whether Paul supporters are all conspiracy theorists. Why don't you try talking about the issues that he is always trying to address?
dolittleskippy 2 months ago
iowa's gov.. fail. iowa residents.. you know who you want..don't let your govenor decide for you. he is a tool for the establishment. Ron Paul is the real deal. vote for him if you cherish the title that has been given to you.."salt of the earth'. otherwise.. you'll be lumped in with the rest of the ignorant republican yuppies who are clearly scared of Ron Paul becoming the president.
L8SPECULATOR 2 months ago
Wow, well I stand corrected. I thought Neil hated Paul because he always looked in pain when people applaused him or when he interviewed him. I think Paul will win all the way. He is bringing out the truth about others track records and they are really antsy over that, beside the fact that he threatens the thrones that Washington has built for themselves.
conservativetothecor 2 months ago
Let's face it.
The ONLY candidate in the Red Faction race who engages ANY enthusiasm on the part of those opposed to our Mombasa Messiah is Dr. Ron Paul.
Let's keep focus on that, okay?
Mitt the RINO and Newt the Neocon have to PAY people to get up and whoop for them.
Ron Paul has so damned many "Paulistas" (and online "Paulbots") that he can't get 'em to STOP cheering him, and none of 'em are doing it for hire.
The Republicans connect with that spirit or they become irrelevant.
-
RichMatarese 2 months ago 2
Thanks Neil.
geofen8036 2 months ago
what the hell fox!?!?!?!?
lwd8ball 2 months ago
Can't believe this is on FOX
firstgenchevelleman 2 months ago
@firstgenchevelleman everything happens for a reason, they might do this only to gain more viewers etc.
1Mperios 2 months ago
We have reached the peak of the war, folks!
Just keep doing what we have been doing....the rest is distraction!
LORDOFWARS8 2 months ago
A sincere thanks to Neil. I don't know if is inclined to vote for Ron Paul, but I appreciate the few people in media who respect the charter of the media and don't try to black out candidates. That goes the for the crazy loon socialist candidates too. In America, we're supposed to listen, and choose for ourselves, not for others.
itsagass 2 months ago
yea bill crystal the zionist shithead who cares about israel more than america
MusicIzMySavior 2 months ago 2
Has hell frozen?!!? wtf is this?!
loismlsx 2 months ago 19
@loismlsx He is just telling you what you want to here!
jyoung0000 2 months ago
@loismlsx made me LOL.
im still laughing
303MMJ 2 months ago
Cavuto is fair with Ron, and always has been. I think Shep is too. I know the Judge and Stossel are. Cavuto and the Judge and Stossel are bucking their boss, Roger Aiels, but it is nice to hear Cavuto telling OReilly to shut up! Bill O has no more cerdibility...he doesnt give a damn about "the folks". If he did, he would keep his mouth shut and allow the voters to pick, instead of trying to sway the election. OReiley is a fraud.
calimar28 2 months ago 35
This has been flagged as spam show
Busted! Ron Paul racist rant caught on tape! SEARCH FOR THIS PEOPLE HE IS BUSTED MUST WATCH TILL END!!!!
jeffdkillman 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I like this man...so Fox isn't all bad. Why not just let the people vote for who they want.
tmmy773 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I like this man...so Fox isn't all bad. Why not just let the people vote for who they want.
tmmy773 2 months ago
I like this man...so Fox isn't all bad. Why not just let the people vote for who they want?
tmmy773 2 months ago
Bless you MR.Neil Cavuto for your standing up to the corporate media smear that seems to be running amuck at Fox and other cable news shows against DR.Ron Paul!Moreover;that it is your employer that you took on!Yes.Ron Paul has an army of people that know he is the genuine artical and is ready for The Oval office!Thanks!
Kevin4RonPaul 2 months ago
I love neil cavuto. There are only 3 that I will listen to. The first 2 are Neil and Judge Andrew Napolitano. The third guy worth listening to is John Stossel. The guys you don't want to ever listen to are Bill OReilly, Krauthammer, and so on...too many to list.
ronpaulforpots 2 months ago
Neil is the man! so is Ron Paul
Super2DAWG 2 months ago
Any man hated by the system and status quo as much as Ron Paul, has to be good, legitimate and absolutely necessary to bring down the corrupt corporatocracy we have.
DennyDucet 2 months ago
Ron Paul will win the popular vote in the general election of 2012. However, I'm not convinced that will be enough for him to become president....sad but true. I will hope for the best ( a Ron Paul Presidency ) and prepare for the worst ( 1984 by George Orwell ). I pray that the powers that be will humble themselves and retake their sanity. Hopefully, for their sake, they will... otherwise they will surely wake the sleeping lion that is the free people of the world.
TEMPEWITNESS 2 months ago
RON PAUL OR FULL BLOWN REVOLUTION!
DennyDucet 2 months ago
I thought voting was about what the PEOPLE want....not what the media speculates.
kristimjlove 2 months ago
Cavuto will be fired soon..........
2skullscrushing 2 months ago 2
Bravo Neil. That was well said.
secerto 2 months ago
@1:40
Cavuto winks at the camera all like... yea... sup... lol
guitarfreakdan 2 months ago
Ron Paul - please, Please, PLEASE run as a third-party candidate in 2012.
American citizens NEED you to run as a third-party candidate!
SoINeedAName48 2 months ago
I can't believe I'm Liking a Neil Cavuto news segment.
Shuuwatch 2 months ago
@Shuuwatch one can't help but wonder if neil is starting to at long last see the writeing on the wall now
bazsohamster 2 months ago
Ron Paul is the Koch Brothers bitch
jfabris 2 months ago
@jfabris any proof?
augerrusty 2 months ago
@jfabris Do a simple google search and you will find plenty of articles about how much the Koch brothers hate Ron Paul.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 I see no factual evidence of the Koch Brothers hating Ron Paul. The only information I find on the subject is from Ron Paul disciples posted on comment boards like these. Ron Paul is the Koch Brothers wet dream; no government to stop them from world domination.
jfabris 1 week ago
@jfabris What you just stated is a non sequitur. You find no evidence that something isn't, therefore it is. No, that's not the way it works. You can't prove something that doesn't exist.
The last think Wall Street kingpins want is a Paul victory because that will mean an end to the limitless risk-free gambling they are able to do while getting taxpayers to cover their debts when they lose. Read up on the Fed and how their policies benefit the rich and steal money out of your pocket.
RWT683 1 week ago
I voted O'bummer last election...I'm voting Ron Paul this time.
MOXWELLDIAMOND 2 months ago 5
@MOXWELLDIAMOND good for you.
gold95 2 months ago
This is great. Neil is one of the three hosts on the Fox channels that I respect, the other two being the Judge and Stossel.
bluezoso 2 months ago 16
It's not enough to say "Vote Ron Paul"
PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES IN MOST STATES.
w w w. bluerepublican. org
IF YOU ARE NOT REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.
IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN.
WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy & paste this everywhere and THUMBS UP! w w w. ronpaul2012 . c o m
ICproductions2020 2 months ago
thank you Neil for your fairness
scottfree66 2 months ago 10
Hell just froze over! :D Blowback's a biaatch, isn't it, Fox News? :D ;) Respect to Neil!!!!
druids84 2 months ago
Well heaven forbid! haha
MrColtgordon 2 months ago
this won't change that fact that you are evil who had been defeated.
aboselaiman 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you live in Colorado
Louisiana
New Hampshire
or Wyoming
and are not already registered as a Republican, you have missed your chance to vote for Ron Paul. Sorry sleepy heads. The registration deadline has passed in those states. Those of you in the remaining states had better move now.
Kentucky: Registration Deadline: Dec 31, 2011
Iowa: Registration Deadline: Dec 24, 2011
Florida: Registration Deadline: Jan 3, 2012
bluerepublicanDOTorg
/watch?v=Tr83CL7NuS4
EverythingInWords 2 months ago
Neil is the only one on Fox that has a clue. The only one that delivers fair and balanced news. The rest of them should be on The View, since they like to shove their opinions down the throats of Americans so much.
angelnblu 2 months ago 2
Thank you sir
anonymousguitarguy 2 months ago
Cavuto has balls.
sporganmurloc 2 months ago
you know what, you're all right cavuto.
davidreefer 2 months ago
its amazing, they say "if he wins iowa, its no big, lots of candidateds have won iowa and lost.." then they turn around and say somthing totally different when gingrich or romney look like theyre doin good in iowa... its such a big deal for them!!!
pentecostkid20 2 months ago
GOP better get behind Ron Paul because he has a lot of supporters that aren't neocons and hate wall street bailouts.
GaryVolts 2 months ago 22
Nice try, looser.
Winner of remaining caucuses, becomes our President!
Removes the thiefs, reverses bull-shit fake laws by o-boy group, put all associated with o-boy and bush into jails, shuts down soros his group, axelrod"s group as well,etc,etc!
Ron Paul 2012
johnnyboypdq 2 months ago 3
@johnnyboypdq Well, that's a nice dream.
Ron Paul would bring about as much real change to this country as can be brought, short of armed revolution, but nobody will go to jail. That's crossing a line he can't cross.
Notice also he is campaigning now on "Audit the Fed" instead of End the Fed. He never says End the Fed anymore. He knows how far he can go without physically putting himself in danger. (which he still could be.) I still would do anything to get him elected.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 Actually your understanding of his position is distorted. He knows you can't just close the FED in one day, so he wants to introduce competing currencies, and eventually faze out the Fed. he has never said to just close down the Fed in one day.
But you may be right, a real bloody revolution may be the only thing that will bring about change. Let's hope that never happens.
gold95 2 months ago
@gold95 From the perspective of the bankers and all those who profit from this system, "phasing out" the Fed is just as bad as ending it outright. I hope Ron Paul will do it. But he has backed off somewhat on the anti-Fed rhetoric. (Focuses on the Fed's bad policies instead of the Fed as a system)
As far as competing currency JFK was the last to try that (silver backed US Notes). In the internet age & with the awareness people now have, let's hope Ron Paul is more successful. Ron Paul 2012.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 Correction: I mixed up silver certificates and US notes which were not the same thing. And they were issued before Kennedy. So really AFAIK no president since the Fed Act was passed has stood up to the Fed.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 Classical economics theories like quantity theory of money have been replaced by Keynesian economics a long time ago. Most inflation is demand side, not supply, and aggregate demand and aggregate supply are not in equilibrium instantaneously since prices are sticky in the short run. Flexibility occurs in the long run, and to assume all money supplies are transactional is ridiculous, it ignores savings. It's money demand that's important. I don't care what Ron Paul book you read.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid What savings? The trillions in gold held by central banks while they preach to us that it's worthless (here take this paper!), or the rapidly depreciating savings of the working and middle class stolen through central bankers controlling monetary policy?
I do not agree 100% with the Austrians. However we do not have real Keynesianism today. Read "Debunking Economics." Ron Paul is still smarter and more honest than any of those puppet whore POS running against him.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 Sorry, but the Great Depression was triggered by a deflationary spiral, as the Federal Reserve at the time contracted the money supply, when they should've expanded it, which they couldn't extend credit because the exchange was fixed with gold. This is a documented fact. Those of us that actually took economics and/or work in the financial industry know this, regardless of what silly libertarian book you read by Ron Paul.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid Documented fact my ass.
And those of you who "work in the financial industry" only know you are robbing and defrauding the world blind, and lately, so do we. (Maybe you don't... you seem to be an idiot who believes his own lies.) Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, B of A, etc are all insolvent. Your securities, your loans, and your stock is worthless, and the whole world knows this. So enjoy the party while it lasts, because eventually the people will make you foot the bill.
RWT683 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid I forgot to add the only thing that keeps stock prices up is 600 billion a year in laundered drug money added onto your bottom line. (Why won't they wipe out the opium crop in Afghanistan again? The coke in Columbia?) Your whole profession is 1000 times more criminal than the guy who holds up 7-eleven for $100 of crack money. He goes to prison but you keep stealing millions.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 Wow that's pretty funny, considering I don't work for Goldman Sachs or Morgan Stanley and I never said anything about the bailouts, I was against them, as were most people out here, because that's obviously not Capitalism. I love how you come at me with media fueled hate, that's mature.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid Hey you initiated a conversation with me, referencing stuff I didn't even comment about, and with a bad attitude. So consider it a return on investment.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 It doesn't really matter about debating true Keynesian schools of thought, what's important here is the way Keynes' viewed inflation. He challenged the quantity theory of money with money demand. If you make $10grand in one week and don't spend a dime, your money didn't touch prices. To assume a direct and proportionate link between inflation rates and money supply expansion, you'd have to assume the whole supply is transactional. That's ridiculous, it's not.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 This is why more and more modern economists are redefining inflation to mean a general increase in price levels, measured through the CPI index. Only Austrian schools of though still adhere to quantity theory. What about trade deficits? That actually helps money supply expansion because it provides price competition from goods beyond the current supply. I'm afraid monetary inflation is a supply side cause that doesn't always hold weight, depending on other variables.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 By the way, now that I think about it. Why don't you explain to me how that libertarian market fairy works again. The Great Depression is a good example to show that the Ron Paul market fairy is as real as Santa Clause. I'm curious as to why demand didn't induce on falling prices before the 29 crash. Could it be that people aren't cattle,and don't respond to market conditions like clockwork? Could it be the economy isn't as mechanized as Rob Paul thinks?
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 Yeah, it could be. Because that's what happened. That's just like saying "low interest rates will always induce borrowing." Really? Ever heard of a liquidity trap? It depends on various other variables. If interest rates are low coupled in with threats of prolonged deflation, even at zero percent on a loan, 3% deflation a year, real rates suppress borrowings. Demand deficient unemployment is another example that mechanized equilibrium doesn't always occur.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid You want me to respond to your theoretical scenario like I am a worshiper of Austrian Econ. I already said I do not 100% agree with it. Like for example in Man, Economy and the State Rothbard basically says monopolies and a monopoly price can't exist. I find that ludicrous. I support Ron Paul primarily for his foreign policy, and his Econ policy cannot possibly do as much damage as Wall Street and the Fed has already done to this country since we entered the era of free fiat money.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 Well I don't agree with the last half of your last comment, but I do agree with you on monopolies. I don't hate on monopolies, I admire them, as long as they're legitimate. Goldman Sachs is not legitimate, and should've failed and been replaced.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid I don't see how you can admire a monopoly. Maybe you admire whatever maximizes profit. But even Keynes said all his theory was aimed at maximizing employment. Monopolies hurt people, they eliminate price discovery and obviously if nobody can enter the market, that has to hurt employment.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 I happen to agree with Chairman Bernanke's economic views, but I'm really in no place to comment as to whether or not he practices them. I'm not exactly defending individuals here, I'm merely defending the economy's need for a central banking influence. I'm not defending individual Federal Reserve board governors. It's kind of like saying "well the president is corrupt so we should just abolish the presidency." That's my main point here.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid I actually tend to think there should be a central bank, but it should NOT be privately owned and controlled. That is the problem with the Fed. In most countries the central bank is gov't owned. So you could say I differ from Ron Paul there. I do believe in the gold standard because it is the only thing that can bring spending and deficits under control.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 I think it should be privately owned, because the financial industry is private industry. I don't think they should be above audits though, nor do I think they should shrug off Congress, since it is Congress with the authoring to delegate monetary authority. I think a balance is important, I try not to have extremist thoughts on either side. Socialism is extreme, but libertarian free market ideas are extreme as well, on the other side of the spectrum.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 Ron Paul is funny with that. He's so focused on abolishing the Federal Reserve, often citing reasons regarding regulatory control, yet at the same time he'll support private industry. I think that's going to be a weakness for him if he's nominated. Not everyone is well versed in economics. You may understand his position, but the average voter will most likely be confused.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid My main point with Keynesian models, is the way he categorized inflation. Most people discuss inflation generally, without labels. There's demand-pull inflation, cost-push, stagflation, hyperinflation etc..even deflation could be demand side or credit deflation etc, and all individually have different variables interacting with them, and it could get pretty deep.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid The difference is you are looking at it as just inflation, i.e. price increase, while Paul is looking at it as depreciation of the currency. Look at different hyperinfations that have occurred throughout history. To say that the quantity of money will not affect prices is pretty obtuse. In point of fact it is the value of money that primarily determines prices. And no fiat currency has ever lasted, John Jesus Christ Keynes not withstanding.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 When did I say quantity doesn't affect inflation rates? Read my last comment.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid For example, let's say there's an oil spill or war in the middle east which disrupts the petrodollars market and/or shipping. So here you have an inverted market of higher spot prices, no storage. That's going to be bearish on the dollar, driving up gold prices. So here you have all these pockets of inflation, yet root cause lies outside of monetary policy. It may result in too much money on a smaller amount of goods, yet it was not triggered by any type of easing.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid Well yes I concede there can be many causes of inflation. However I don't think you'll convince me that the *primary* cause, right now in reality and not in some theoretical scenario, is monetary policy and the private banker owned Fed's control over that policy.
RWT683 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid I think it's kind of funny you think the Fed should be private because Wall St is private, but you think they should dictate (or can even know) how much money people need and not the market. Why should any private entity have that much power?
Most business professors I knew in college said Econ is not a science. It is a priori where real science is a posteriori. Of course the Econ profs protested.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 I completely disagree with that, I've never had an economics professor say it's not a science. You're actually saying a bachelor of science degree program in economics contains professors who state it's not a science...lol.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid I said business professors said it was not a science. Not econ profs.The reason it is unlike other sciences is economists, whether it's Keynes, von Hayek, Smith, et al are creating a theory and trying to find evidence to support that theory. Real science, like physics, takes evidence and constructs a theory from it. You know what will happen in physics. All Econ is just our best guess about what is really happening. Ultimately we can't predict what people will choose, just guess.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 So, that is proof right there that you saying we know exactly what will happen in particle physics isn't really true. Keynes developed theory during the great depression. Keynes looked at economic conditions as evidence and then developed the theory based on this evidence, which is obviously contested. However, there are areas of other sciences that are contested as well. Do all scientists agree on everything? Global warming debate? There's many examples that they don't.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid About the average voter you are probably right. Most people in the country had no idea what the Federal Reserve was until Ron Paul got on TV, even though it is printed on every goddamn dollar in their wallets. He does seem to be doing well in Iowa though. If they do not vote for him all I can say is they must enjoy zionist-banker rule.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 Oh sorry, you did say that. My point is, I'm not saying Keynes had everything nailed precisely. Most of Keynes's points, as well as mine, are aimed at the fact that no, you can't predict other people's behavior because the economy, like the people that comprise it, is not robotic. Which is why I support a central bank, which I guess you agree with, we just disagree on the authority of the bank.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid Mainly I think there needs to be regulation of the financial sector. And to that end the revolving door between Wall St and DC must be closed. The financial sector has shown repeatedly they cannot be trusted to go it "lassiez faire." However if Mom & Pop want to open a shoe shop on Main St., there should be little to no regulation. Free Market works to a point then you have to watch for monopolies. Not saying Ron Paul believes this, it's just what I believe.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 I didn't expect you to contest anything. I enjoy a challenge, but only from people that know what they're talking about of course. I like debating economics with people of different views. I wasn't sending these messages thinking you're going to eventually say "oh wow you're so right what was I thinking." You obviously have your opinion, and I have mine. In the end we're both just supporting theories from different schools of thought.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 My main problem with the Austrian school of thought, and Ron Paul is a testament to this, is they introduce theories as if it were a precise fact. If you look at their quantity theory of money, it's a good example. If you look at marginal utility components and the use of mathematical bi-conditional logical connectives, there's still a margin of error, although marginal rates of substitution in consumption and transformation in production doesn't necessarily have to be accurate
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 Cardinal and ordinal utilities doesn't have to be spot on to serve a purpose either. Point is, Ron Paul, like most libertarians, state theory as fact. He does this every time he mentions the free market patching things up. I support Keynesian economics because Keynes's motivation was to display inaccuracies in classical economics views,and develop a theory that developed more possibilities and deeper analysis, which I feel evolved economics.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 Look at the 1870s. There was supply glut and price/wage deflation, yet the money supply expanded 2.6% annually throughout the decade. So, again, the market fairy didn't swoop in. As far as science goes, that's not entirely true. A hypothesis in and of itself is an educated guess, which is tested. When it comes to matter, we know properties of about 4-5% of existing forms. That's one part in 20. Anti-gravitating dark matter expanding the universe we know nothing about.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid I think the point I was making was Econ operates on the admission that we cannot know everything. I merely used physics as an example; classical physics was based on everything being discoverable and going from effects to causes. A lot of Econ theory goes from cause to effect.
I am open to a limited power central bank, however i think gold would at least restrain limitless credit and the resulting bubbles.
I'm getting tired... I'm calling it a night but thanks for the discussion
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 Last point. Most of the analysis I do is technical, yet I don't ignore economic data. The market would kill any investor that just looked at economic data if it's trading technically, and vice verse. Economics should be introduced with a point Keynes made- it's not about which girl you think is the prettiest, it's about which girl you think other people think is the prettiest, and then it's about which girl you think other people think other people think is the prettiest.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 I think if people kept that in mind before diving into economics they'd understand better. Austrian theory has evidence. Keynesians have evidence. The difference is, Keynes never entirely dismissed Austrian theory, he simply evolved economics into other possibilities, which is what I like about him.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 Oh by the way, I'm going to close with something a little off topic. I'm obviously not a Ron Paul supporter, but here's a heads up. Ron Paul, if he actually gets nominated, is going to face a really big challenge. That challenge is going to come from the fact he's affiliated with crazy conspiracy theorists. It's going to destroy him easily. They think most people support their lunacy, but that's not even close.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid Saying stuff like this is why people think that. You must be one of the people RP wants to stop from looting.
dolittleskippy 2 months ago
@dolittleskippy Staying "stuff" like what?
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid Like people that support him are conspiracy theorists and that's going to destroy him. Just because we don't believe in the status quo anymore and KNOW the government is corrupt enough to pull ANYTHING doesn't make us Con. Theorists.
dolittleskippy 2 months ago
@dolittleskippy It doesn't make you conspiracy theorists, if it were actually true. Saying the Gov. is "corrupt enough to pull anything" is the same as saying the Gov. is willing to conspire against the interests of the people. That's an outrageous claim and should be supported by even more outrageous evidence. If you had that evidence, it would be conspiracy, but not a theory. It would be fact. But, you don't have it, therefore it's a conspiracy theory.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid I have lots of proof but I would have to send you all over the place to get it. I like to think that people with the net are capable of researching stuff on their own. But for starters if you like watch some of the videos by Charlotte Iserbyt on youtube. She wrote "The deliberate dumbing down of America" Some people can't be convinced of anything no matter what though so I have stopped trying too hard to do so.
dolittleskippy 2 months ago
@dolittleskippy How old are you? I'm guessing under 21. Looking things up on google or youtube isn't "researching." I can find websites online that think President Obama is Osama Bin Laden. There's 50,000 people that actually think Elvis isn't dead. There were people that though the U.S. was conspiring a world government with the Soviet Union. Only problem was, the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. The it was the UN, then the CFR. It goes on and on. None of this is real.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@dolittleskippy *there were people that thought...I meant to say. Point is, nothing you find on google or youtube or anywhere else on the internet is proof of anything. Don't be so gullible, conspiracy theorists at the top of the chain know it's all crap and sell people like you. Don't be a sucker.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid I told you to learn about Charlotte Iserbyt. She has traveled and lived all over the world, worked for Reagan on the US State Dept, was senior advisor for the OERI Dept of Ed. She was born around 1930 and grew up in a highly educated family. (Yale) I have read her books so please stop acting like the web is the only source of info. I am an avid reader and have been for about 48 years. I also read books by Ron Paul, Rush Limpbrains and as far the other direction as Howard Stern.
dolittleskippy 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid Go Troll somewhere else. Leave us Ron Paulers alone. Wall Street Wiz Kid. Your name pretty much says it all.
dolittleskippy 2 months ago
@dolittleskippy I'm a "troll" because I don't agree with you? Interesting.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 They think they're doing him a favor, but if they really want him to win, they should shutup. It's going to doom him. Anyway, nice talking to you. Take care.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 Or, what if there is easing, yet increased spending on imports. The trade deficit provides price competition beyond domestic supply. Couple that in with an increase in savings, and you're not going to see a proportionate link between monetary expansion and inflation rates. While I do agree monetary inflation exists as one form, it's not really a short run impact since prices are usually sticky. There's a lag in flexibility between the initial easing and it's impacts on prices.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid You keep mentioning savings like people actually have any. Look at reality, not theory. This country is bankrupt thanks to current econ theory. Earlier you said if I get a 10,000 check and save it how would it affect price. It wouldn't but who the heck does that? When people get a loan it's because they need the money. End consumers don't get a loan and put it back in the bank. They spend it. Hence inflation.
RWT683 2 months ago
@WallStwizkid And if I am not mistaken both the First and Second Bank of the United States were also privately owned. We have never had a true state central bank in this country.
RWT683 2 months ago
@RWT683 His original thoughts were aimed at unemployment. However, "theory of general employment, interest and money" addressed and challenged the quantity theory of money. Employment is tied in to the same concept, because his summary in terms of unemployment basically addressed demand deficient unemployment, where the market reaches equilibrium when the different between nominal wages and real wages disappear. This of course is navigated by a central bank, so it all ties in some way.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 I'm beginning to think certain youtube users are mentally retarded. They're reading books by Ron Paul, thinking they know economics. My 5 year old niece is smarter than that. If you message me continuing the same old stupidity, you're blocked.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 Hey, maybe you can watch ER for a few months, then you'll know how to be a doctor.
WallStwizkid 2 months ago
@RWT683 You should read "End THe Fed" Even in that book he does not advocate closing it down in one day. Unless you can provide a source where he would close it in one day.
gold95 2 months ago
@gold95 I have read it. Just saying he has stopped using the phrase "end the fed" in the last few months. So he has toned it down slightly. Not saying he no longer wants to end the Fed, and I hope he does end it.
RWT683 2 months ago
This bullshit is backfiring. People aren't stupid.
Ron Paul 2012
vintage0198 2 months ago 38
@vintage0198 The Fox News debates of 2007 perked my interest in Ron Paul by their obvious actions towards him. Haven't turned back since.
ShakedownR3volution 2 months ago
@vintage0198 Yes they are, they voted for Obama.
HandyMan101 2 months ago
About time someone on FoxNews at least reports objectively. Like him or not, it's time to just LET THE PEOPLE VOTE!! Rather than calling him a kook or unelectable or saying he's bad because of Iran or whatever. Talk about why you think some other candidate is better for the American people and ask yourself, what's so bad about exposing the white collar criminals that have absolutely destroyed trust in the system causing small business to hang onto their money instead of invest in the future
turbod8035 2 months ago
Thanks Neil for speaking facts. When will we get real journalism again? Use to be that the media would simply report the news instead of trying to 'Make the News.' Americans are sick of 'Status Quo' politicians and the crony capitalistic oligarchy. Mainstream Media is a big part of this and Americans know it. America is waking up! America will vote Ron Paul!
brianlblackman 2 months ago 4
Bravo, Cavuto, Bravo. You just gained some rep in my book
astari24 2 months ago 2
Thank you Neil Cavuto. It needed to be said.
Itugen88 2 months ago 3
Nice. This is quite refreshing.
tlkshowhst 2 months ago 2
Thanks Neil! You are fair, but FOX is NOT! Fox is counterfeit conservative crap.
2008liberty 2 months ago
Good job Neil.
jalderwood 2 months ago
Way to go Neil! Freedom and Liberty can't be stopped!
illuminatedgrog 2 months ago
Cavuto might be "killing him with kindness", then will stab Ron Paul in the back.
only time will tell
wooite 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
rEVOLution!
Dr. Paul 2012!!!
avalkauskas 2 months ago
what a great video and 'semi' endorsement...one of the best Ron Paul publicity thus far...
damiensongs 2 months ago 4
Thank you Neil for speaking up, that the media should be neutral and accurate in it's presentation of anyone running for office. Success is showing up in a rainstorm when know one else will. It is not up to the media or elites to vote for us and as Ron Paul said the other night..."So much for Democracy, as long as Democracy goes their way". This video puts you above the rest.
MacKid69 2 months ago 4
Yes, your business should be telling the truth only.
Thank you Neil Cavuto.
Ron Paul! Ron Paul!
From Singapore
rutilequartzlight 2 months ago 4
Neil Cavuto, you cheeky bastard!
hairydysentery 2 months ago
Everybody better watch this guys show! Give him ratings otherwise the System will try to take this guy off, a new freedom fighter!
MrColtgordon 2 months ago
Thanks Neil! Liberty is rising, Ron Paul 2012!
TheDarkestEye 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012 for REAL change because…
* He has never voted to raise taxes.
* He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
* He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
* He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
* He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
* He voted against the Patriot Act.
* He voted against the Iraq war.
* He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
tsnod1213 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I STRONGLY URGE WE E-MAIL DR.PAULS CAMPAIGN MANAGERS/WEBSITES ENMASSE, TO PLEAD WITH HIM TO MAKE A INDEPENDENT RUN, AS THE GOP HAS BASICALLY ADMITTED THEY WILL IGNORE RON PAUL IF HE WINS IOWA CAUCUS, AND FOCUS ON ROMNEY/GENGRICH. THE FIX, ONCE AGAIN, IS IN. I DON'T UNDERSTAND PEOPLES WILLINGNESS TO SHRUG OFF THE CONSTITUTION. WE ARE AT A CRITICAL TIME IN OUR COUNTRY. IF WE CONTINUE DOWN THIS ROAD, AMERICA WILL BE DESTROYED FROM WITHIN. ANYONE WHO HAS WEBSITES TO EMAIL PLZ POST LETS DO THIS PPL!
LegalizeLiberty420 2 months ago
I think that Paul will win IA, & NH......but then, you need the delegates to secure the nomination.
Now that's going to be tricky!
TheDeJureTour 2 months ago
I forgive you, Neil, for complying with some antipauletism in the past. I know you are being allowed to save some face now that it is clear that Ron Paul will Win Iowa and Bill O'Reilly mentally prepares himself for writing apology letters and resigning . As disclosure nears I look forward to public figures forgiving themselves and spreading the word of truth and love. It's barely the beginning. But the unstoppable vision is shared by the youths of the world and it is done!
2PacChopra 2 months ago
Cavuto just earned more of my respect for that.
jayrod59 2 months ago
If you guys watch Outfoxed, you'll see why Neil is probably forced to ask questions and push agendas that he doesn't even want to. I feel bad for some of them who look like they want to get over to a medium where they can say how the REALLY feel. I would love to hear Neil uncensored :P
agrv8ion 2 months ago
I e-mailed and thanked him.
I consider it to be a form of the free market :P
The reporters who piss me off, I let them know I'm pissed.
The reporters who are fair, I let them know I appreciate it.
If everyone did this, I think it'd make quite a difference.
agrv8ion 2 months ago
While I appreciate any message that is positively portrayed for Ron Paul, Cavuto is a snake that says nice things on his show but is a huge ass to Paul during the debates.
timberwolves100 2 months ago
Good on him for pushing through what looks like it should have been a sick day just to lay down the straight dope like this.
SaintEntreri 2 months ago
Ron Paul 2012!!!
ryanthomastew 2 months ago
Ron Paul is storming America in one way or the other.
If they join good it would be easier if they not who gives a fuck ...
RP is winning in both cases. :)
snowbeach1981 2 months ago
Thank you, Neil Cavato, for speaking the truth! You've earned MUCH respect from me! ;)
Eye2EyeIIIV 2 months ago 2
MSM is FULL to the brim with America-Hating Communist Scum who shouls all be hung by their necks until dead!!!
Then, we should all throw block parties!
MARINE1146 2 months ago