Added: 3 years ago
From: EddietheArsehead
Views: 50,164
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thats a nice how do you do! lol.

  • i met the devil once, when I visited a satanic mechanic. he seemed like a decent chap. could he just have gotten a bad rap?

  • Who got hard... oh those tits...

  • exorcizm-this is reality

    who with devil,alway will be suffer.

  • I am so sick of hearing how somebody cashed in on or ripped off another film. there is no story in existence that has not borrowed thematically from classic literature which now just leaves us with the variation of details which makes it seem like an original idea. I guess nobody can ever make another vampire or zombie film because after all they're just cashing in on nosferatu or notld. you either like a movie or you don't but there is nothing wrong with riding a wave it would be stupid not to.

  • @coolrog7564 House of Exorcism WAS actually intended to cash in on the success of The Exorcist because they couldn't find a distributor who would buy the original movie Lisa and the Devil. It's got nothing to do with borrowing thematically.

  • @rulesofac the difference is that the projects original intent was not a cash in. it was only after problems arose as you described that avenue was taken out of desperation. just because someone creaes a successful film and repopularises a certain genre,theme or character doesnt mean they now own it. cash ins are good for everyone so i don't know why their bashed. producers make money and consumers have more choices to choose from so everybody benefits.

  • @coolrog7564 yeah, the producers didn't have much of a choice unfortunately. It was either that or lose a lot of money. While indeed The Exorcist obviously does not own exorcism at all (which has been present in some of the first horror films ever), many people feel that HoE hardly attempted to deviate from the pea soup and profanity they already saw. In fact, I believe they were more interested in the scenes from Lisa and the Devil. It was still a good effort albeit unsuccessful.

  • The Exorcist was much better.

  • The movie was from 1987.

  • When I was 12 years old, I have seen similar thing happening to my aunt, when she came to stay with us for a week. I am 27 now and I still don't know yet what actually happened to my aunt on that week. She used to scream a lot, act weird and when my dad called a priest...and when priest was just on the way like 5 mins away from our house..my aunt could sense the priest coming in and try to scare the hell out of every one..once the priest came..he did some thing that made her calm..wat was that?

  • Notice the cut at 0:20 when the cortortionist was replaced by the actress.

  • Comment removed

  • i honestly don't know if she needs an exorcism....or a rabies shot...kinda hard to tell

  • @sesshomarru1 She just needed a bucket full of ice cold water thrown over her. That would have done the trick ;)

  • Hahahahaha! Nah,sorry,you can't beat a bit of,"You know what she did,your c*nting daughter?"

    Ooh,matron

  • Orgasm. 0:31

  • Very cool possession scenes.

  • @forrykid agree ;D

  • hahahahahahahaha nah this is more of a comedy..!

  • Wasn't this a re-edited european horror film trying to cash-in on the "Exorcist" craze?

  • Not bad really. The contortions aren't cheesy at all.

  • LMAO! at the end of the clip.

  • There's a scene with her and the priest where she says one of the funniest lines in movie history. When the priest asks her "Where do you come from? Where do you come from?" She answers: From a cunt, you jerk!"

  • figo

  • Just a case of PMS

  • WEAK!!! This is a low low low budget (extremely cheesy 70s look to the 'movie') version of the Excorcist.

  • Elke never looked more stunning!

  • i can barely reconise her,,, god! she must have been hard up for cash or convinced if linda blair can get an oscar,,,,,,,,

    lisa and the devil was a film of great style ( if confusing plot), this added to it made even less sense, trashed all the style and i think degraded elke,,,, thank god she did "carry on behind" in the uk to regain dignity.

  • HOLD HER STILL. GET THE STRETCHER.

  • Watch the original uncut version "Lisa and the Devil" - it´s a masterpiece. They shot this additional 20 minutes of godawful exorcism/possession scenes for the US market to cash in with the sucsses of "The Exorcist".

  • @matheusmarchetti Lisa and the Devil was a film of style over substance, the opening titles, theme music and set pieces really are of great style, but what the hell was it all about!!! but when i saw this revised version with these totally stupid Exorcist rip-off scenes it made even less sense and trashed everything stylish the uncut version had! if you want a great ecorcist italian rip-off try The Tempter,here Elke Somers must have been really hard up!! Carry on Behind was a step up from this!

  • @jackscal1 elke sommer did it as a favor to the producer. i think i wrote a pretty fair review of both films on imdb under the username coolrog. i put some plot interpretations i didn't see in other reviews concerning lisa and the devil that i think clear up some questions people have.

  • is it "house of exorcism"??

  • ....not as creepy as Linda Blair!! But still not bad!! What`s the name of the movie??

  • ...x_x

  • huh

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more