Added: 3 years ago
From: tolaviator
Views: 54,487
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (173)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @nobusan84 Trent 892

  • Sometime I'd rather listen to airplane engines than have sex with my wife.

  • not the least annoying sounding engines really. that intermediate whining after take off is raaather irritating >:[

  • @gloomyoutlook your not a born aviation enthusiast then, its pure music to my ears!

  • Roaring takeoff.

  • wow that is the most steady  camera from take off s try againg in 480 quality

  • are these engines really that quiet?

  • Very nice - especially the buzz-saw sound of those engines. Thanks for sharing.

  • Amazing sounds, moderate picture quality. But sound is just amazing! I agree with those who say that the GE90 sounds better! Classic whine proving the 150,700 Lbs of thrust (thrust is equivalent to the "horsepower" term used to describe the static potential power of some racing cars). Just imagine that!

  • I think RR Trent 800 sounds cooler than GE90. Just an opinion.

  • Southwest Airlines is better.

  • @KOolGUy730 Southwest doesn't operate 777s. Nor does it fly internationally. As a domestic carrier, I would tend to agree with you.

  • @jetfreak4 Yes, I know, for domestic flying in the U.S., Southwest is better, Southwest doesn't fly to as many locations as AA, and they still make more money than AA, because Southwest is brilliant and understand that people don't want to spend so much money on airlines.

  • @KOolGUy730

    Southwest Airlines operates a full batch of 737s exclusively. No widebodies. No Airbuses. Nothing.

  • @EmadIV Southwest has expanded their fleet. They have bought AirTran, which will provide more 737's and new 717's.

  • @KOolGUy730

    Come on 717s in an era of 777s! Please! Southwest has too many 737s-that's why it's the most dangerous airline. 737s have the highest fatalities and hull-losses. 777-one hull-loss due to the Trent 800+no fatalities.

  • @EmadIV And Airbus is a bunch of European crap, I wouldn't trust flying in one. If it's not a Boeing I'm not going!!

  • k susto donde un motor de esos se apage!!!

  • Nice sound ;) But GE90-115B is much nicer!

  • soooo smooth

    

  • these engines are powered by god

  • I believe the buzzsaw or AC compressor sound of the engines is caused by the shock waves of the fan blade tips nearing or exceeding the speed of sound but I'm not 100% certain.

  • that wing looks really flimsy :/

    but nice vid :)

  • Trent -800's are jizz worthy...

    just saying.

  • @NickPwnsUTube Oh come on man, you gotta admit the GE90-115B on the -200 and -300 ER are just sexy.

  • @lgkga sorry but the GE90-115B is NOT used on a 200. ONLY the 300ER.

  • love the low roar of the trent 800

  • @nobusan84 Yes that's right

  • The picture quality is fine, but the sound quality is very good! May I ask what camera did you use to film this?

  • @raykrislianggi A Canon S3 IS

  • I love the sounds of the American Airlines 767

  • the sound of the engins are weird like a broken A/C

    lol :P

  • Music is coming out of the engines and I'm loving it!

  • soooooo beautiful and it does sound like a rolls royce

  • damn those trent800's are some bigass engines!! im suprised they dont rip off the wing from all that thrust. seems like they want to go their own way

  • Sounds like a Rolls Royce. Is it?

  • @TangaraG33 yes it sure is...rolls royce trent

  • hmm am not sure but it looks like the B777 200, American airlones don't use the 300 series, actually am not sure if there is any 300 series in the USA Fleet. great spool up and great vid !

  • is this a -300 or a -200 model?

  • @flydelta522 This is a 200, there are no 300's in any fleet in the USA

  • @tolaviator

    Correct, but there are a whole bunch of 777-300's in a far off state named after the first President, in a small little town called Everett, where they have a teeny tiny little barn that makes the best planes in the world!

    ...if it aint a Boeing, I aint going!

    Godspeed.

  • @tolaviator 200ER/IGW.

  • American is ordering 2 777-300s.

  • @tolaviator for about 5 months American ordered some 300's for flights to china from east coast USA and Chicago.

  • @yoyoyoyoshua acutally AA just ordered the 300's a few weeks ago

  • @tolaviator I know but it takes time to build and test.

  • @yoyoyoyoshua AA wont take delivery until late 2012

  • @tolaviator ok.

  • @tolaviator Yes they do. They have 58 767 300. More than 200's. You should stick to delta buddy.

  • @LandRoverWay23 You do realize this is a 777 and not a 767 right? AA has plenty of 767-300. It was the 777-300 which I am talking about. AA is the first US carrier to order the 777-300, Delta has none

  • @tolaviator Yes I do realize its a 777. I was commenting what you said about AA not having 767 300 in their fleet which you deleted. I don't remember exactly what you comment said because you deleted it. Why did you delete what you said? You got caught not knowing something and that's why you deleted it? Maybe you meant 777 and typed out 767? Thats probably what it was, you said 767 and meant 777.

  • @LandRoverWay23 I have no clue what you're talking about deleting a comment, I never deleted any comment that I remember. I may have mistyped somewhere but yes I am aware that AA has 767-300's I have flown them many times. I even have videos here of the AA767-300

  • @tolaviator In 2012 yes!

  • @tolaviator Actually American has now acquired two -300's but not at the time of this video.

  • @MrCars AA wont take delivery of the 300's until late 2012 and actually have have 3 on order at this time

  • @tolaviator actually 5, two orders yesterday. Look forward to see an AA 300ER

  • @tolaviator yet!

  • @tolaviator Your absolutely right. AA have now ordered 5 300ER´s, I really look forward to see it!

  • @tolaviator

    American Airlines just ordered a few 300ERs.

  • @FSXGuy1 u re right fsxguy

    

  • @tolaviator

    This is technically true - at this time, BUT American Airlines has exercised options on 2 x 777-300 and they will be delivered soon. They will be used on long-haul routes - perhaps some AA has not used in years. Hopefully they will go back to New Zealand and Australia - but will most likely use the 787 for these routes.

  • is loud taking off?

  • i am amercian airlines and i have 100,000 advantage miles its so cool to fly everywhere

  • You know when the engine decreases in the air, I hate that grinding sound, bad sound change.

  • Fantastic Rolls Royce - and you can sleep safe knowing that unlike GE they will not be repossessing your home

  • Fantastic Rolls Royce Engines - and you can sleep safe knowing that unlike GE Industries/Bank they will not be repossessing your home

  • @mike40842 I respectfully disagree since the BA Flight 38 Incident.

  • @AirCanadaA55555A

    I agree with you on that-there were other accidents (not hull-losses though) caused by the fuel system failure in the Trent 800. GE90s never had one single hull-loss and probably not one single accident/incident. Same goes with PW4000s.

  • Boeing should make a cruise missile the diameter of that engine with a blast fragmentation warhead (non-nuclear) that has a range of at least 1200 nautical miles-with gps tracking and have stealthy features on it-the weapon WILL scare off any darn country!!!!

  • do these have personal tv's?

  • @RespectTheSky Yes PTVs in every seat

  • What exactly is a "oneworld"?

  • @philiptow AA has two 777's painted in the "oneworld" livery which is the airline alliance in which AA is a member

  • is this a oneworld?

  • @fetchfilms It was not then, it is now

  • first class?

  • Very exciting. I loved it when the engines started to roar. then when the pilot reduced the engines by 50% just after take off. I was nervous when I saw the tip of the wing fluxuating. I know they are built for that. Very good video

  • The engine thrust is not reduced by 50% after takeoff, but rather, the engine thrust limit is changed from D-TO (Takeoff power) to CLB (Climb power). The derate is not that significant, it can sometimes be from 98% N1 ---> 88% N1. But you're right, the change in engine sound is the change in thrust.

  • @AuliaHarun, this is a full power take off which is very different from the normal take off. The full power take off uses nearly 110% N1 and you can notice the engine sound after lift off is different from normal 777 take offs.And yes, The climb power of 777 with RR Trent 800 is around 85-88%.

    Just saying :)

  • I think Full power take off on This 777-200 (02:50) is quieter than Non-Full power take off (03:17)

  • Can anyone tell me why airlines sometimes choose different engines on the same aircraft, i.e an American airline using both GE and Rolls Royce for their 777s?

  • All AA 777's are RR engined

  • @tolaviator not true. 777-200 are the RR Trent engines. The 777-300 are equipped with the GE engines.

  • @P8NTBALL60....please read what I wrote. All AA as in American Airlines 777's are RR powered

  • @P8NTBALL60, I think American Airlines just had Boeing 777-200 and -300, The -300 uses RR Trent 895, not GE90. GE90 is only for -200LR and -300ER. American Airlines don't use GE90....

  • AA has no 300's

  • Oh, sorry. But It's right that AA uses only RR Trent engines on a 777.

  • Not true. The GE-90 is available on all Boeing 777 variants.

  • @maxthrustset The Boeing 777-300 Regualr has no GE90s.

  • @AirCanadaA55555A GE 90's are engine choices on all variants of the 777. However the GE 90 itself have different versions for different 777's they have different thrust ratings. All from the weekest ge 90- 77 to the most powerful the GE 90-115 B

  • @Maxxtris85 Yes, but all the "300" versions GE90 go on the "200/200ER" version of the aircraft.

  • @AirCanadaA55555A I guess thats correct to a certain degree, the 773 and 772 er do share the GE 90-94 together but thats it, the 772 have the weakest version the GE 90-77 thats only available on the 772 not the er varient and the 773 have another choice of the GE 90, the GE 90-92 which is only available on the 773. The GE 90 have a ton loads of variants its crazy.

  • @maxthrustset Sorry I ment regular.

  • @raykrislianggi Well GE90 is used for 5/6 types of Boeing 777.

  • @stonebridgeboy86 different range capability possibly

  • It really has to do with economics. An airline will decide what engine suits its needs and will measure payload/distance to engine performance.

    Another factor to consider is the fact that some engine manufacturers have exclusive agreements with one or more of the airframe manufacturers. For example, all newer versions of the Boeing 777 are supplied exclusively with GE engines. The same is true with the Boeing 737NG series of aircraft.

  • I know for a fact that the RR-Trents are lighter, which equate to either more fuel or payload that can be carried...

  • British Airways is the only airline I'm aware of that uses 2 engine types for their 777-200ER's(the only varient they currently operate with the the exception of the "regular 200"). They were unhappy with the initial teething issues their GE's had so their second batch of 777's were fitted with Rolls Royce's. American only uses Rolls Royce on their 777's though

  • @TSBA92

    Actually BA's 777-200 (not ER) has the GE90-77B engines. The BA 777-200ER has the Rolls-Royce Trent 895 :)

  • @EmadIV Only the first batch of 777-200's Brtish Airways received were the non-ER versions, they received a large wave of GE powered 777-200ER's after that varient baceame standard shortly after (it was part of their original order of 777's). They next wave that started arriving around 2000 were Rolls Royce powered

  • RR's cones are the best

  • Holy crap how long of a flight is this???

  • about 13.5 hrs. I flew this in November.

  • That noise is the engine power is being reduced. Aircraft can only go so fast under 10K feet, IIRC it is 250 knots. So you have to reduce power to slow down a bit. They will increase in power as soon as a higher rate of climb is selected.

  • noisy engine...

  • Noisy, yet very powerful to blow you car 100 meters away.

  • WOW that changing to a low growl at 3:13 just gave me the chills =)

  • This is a very long takeoff roll !!

  • It was fully loaded and full of fuel for the 13 hour flight to Chicago. It is a 777-200ER

  • Oh , Thanks.

    I was in a A340-300 which is fully loaded too.Vancouver-Hong Kong :)

  • What I didnt like of american airlines is that the flight attendant made me stand up to close the overhead compartment!! She was like : is this luggage yours? and I was like.. yes... and she was like would you please stand up and close it?

    WTF?! I didnt get mad but still! They should do it!

    I saw the same thing on the flight towards chicago and I thought what?! did she asked the passenger to stand up?? And on the way back it happened to me!! I dont understand why!!

  • Good video. I love the sound of the 777 engine going from idle to 110% for takeoff. First a bit of whine of increasing frequency, then they push the throttle all the way forward and it just becomes a loud rumble.

    Looks like you have a nice seat, too!

  • The Rolls Royces sound a lot cooler than the P&W's or GE's for what it is worth. More growl !!!! Althou the GE90-115 is a lot more powerful now....

  • Comment removed

  • 300 ER'S do not have Trents as an option only GE90-115. Unless you meant to put 200 and put 300 ER instead.

  • they get up to speed faster than wat u think

  • And a hell of a lot faster than an A340 (the 777's supposed competitor lol). Also they are much louder in 1st than Bus or Coach on TO. Once cruising, they are silent as 2 large at a low RPM is more efficient and quiet than 4 small at high RPM's.

  • you have to remember the enormous weights involved- and climate conditions.

  • 50 sec liftoff? No. The runway isn't that long.

  • it waz like that on my LHR-JFK flight to and back!

  • Hello!Nice takeoff to Chiago Ohare!=)

    Give you 5 star!=)

    Greeting TheCARRE74=)

  • awesome video, took 50secs to lift off :)

  • How many hours of flying from NRT to ORD'???

  • It's about 11 hours or so...Not too bad...I enjoy it..

  • VERY LONG TAKEOFF!

    great! HEAVY TAKEOFF

  • Oh I love this sound.... 5/5

  • what balls! powerfull!!!

  • These engines are extremely- powerfull, and designed for heavy lift capacity. Fuel, bags, people!

  • 5/5 !!!

  • take off looked scary!

  • Haha , why is it so ?

  • wow the sound of the engine was awesome, i like it

  • I'm talking about what I just said. How hard is that to figure out.

  • One of the compressor blades sounds that is off perfect angle with the rest of them on the right engine. The buzzing sound shows this. This is probably due to a bird strike. This phenomenon is called "buzz-sawing." The culprit compressor blade needs replacing.

  • what the heck are you talking about?

  • That's actually caused by the tips of the fan blades creating shockwaves as they go supersonic. The shockwaves collapse downstream and release acoustic energy, resulting in an audible fundamental frequency plus its even and odd harmonics -- a sawtooth wave. Nearly all high-bypass turbofan engines do this.

  • @chuppa1chups .RR engines seem to have more of this effect. Is it because the fan is rotating faster with a three shaft design?

  • i like it when they hot the toga switches before the aircraft is fully straightended up on the runway

  • Really cool!!!

  • Japan airlines flies that route too. Taken Japan air as well, B747-400 equipment. Good service, but I like American, the B777 is alot more confortable!

  • yep, it's an awesome flight. I will be flying that route on march, chicago to Tokyo for the third time. Long flight but time goes by so quickly, good entertainment on board, and sushi. Tokyo is awesome!

  • hard as bump at 0:08

    Awesome engine sounds. For LuisCanjura, i think the flight time's somewhere around 12 to 14 hours.

  • the plane im going to fly

  • sounds like an A330

  • i love how the wing sages with fuel its so cool to see it slowly rise as the air speed build such simple physics moving such massive weights...great vid wonderful sounding engines

  • wat camera?

  • thats crazy how it can go directly from tokyo to chicago, wat a changeover

  • Excellent video! Are there RR engines on this 777?

  • Thank you, and yes they are RR engines

  • yes the RR trent 800

  • how many hours are from narita to o hare??

  • I think these are the trent 800 engines. I like the spool up sound, it is so unique.

  • Comment removed

  • What type of 777 is this ?

    E.g , 777-200LR

  • Boeing 777-200ER of course. Boeing 777-200LR uses GE90-110B, not RR Trent 895.

  • I know that lol . But some 777-200/ER uses other engines not RR.

  • The airline using PW4000 engines are United Airlines, and Vietnam Airlines. The rest of it I think is using RR Trent 800s =)

  • Nice . RR is the best choice I guess :D

  • Yes it does!

  • GE FTW!

  • u sure do travel a lot are you a fellow pilot or do u just travel?

  • if he were he'd be in the cockpit....

  • Tolaviator - nice video. Looks like you were in 3J? You got some good sound on that one.

  • Fantastic video. They don't get any better than this. Love those engines.

  • Another excellent vid! I am a MS flight simmer myself, and my favorite jet to fly in simulations is the 777. Do you know how far north you were en route from Tokyo to Chicago O'Hare by any chance? All of your vids are simply awesome!

  • Thanks, sure we curved up from Tokyo towards south of the Bering Strait, across Alaska, and Canada continuing on into Chicago.

  • Are u a pilot?

    I notice that u do alot of flying.

    Its very costly to be flying right now.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more