This looks like an old crappy game with a low budget and backyard graphics. Battlefield 3 and even MW3 would be considered more "realistic" than this.
-Rich! WTH happened? -Me and Nixon were ambushed by insurgents -Nixon died in the ambush? -yes, sir, he's KIA by friendly fire from Redhawk -What?! Where's Redhawk? -KIA too, sir -What happened to him? -He got killed 4 days ago by an insurgent while he tried to hit Svenson with a mortar because he confused him with an insurgent -Wait, tyhis happened four days ago? Why didn't you report in? -The insurgent stole our Humvee, sir. -I should've listened to the general about you... Orignal bad company
@lansio94 Your right Battlefield isn't realistic in the way that you might be thinking. Battlefield is realistic in its sounds, weapons, and graphics but it still has that gaming element. Say what you like about the game play not being realistic, I doesn't mater its a game it isn't meant to be so in-depth realistic that its a chore to play it. Battlefield has found that mix between realistic and a game.
@galvendorondo Battlefield 3 is realistic in terms of graphics but definitely not in terms of gameplay and I wouldnt call Arma 2 the most realistic either.
The most realistic game I've played is Red Orchestra 2. It's extremely realistic as hell.
people who say this isnt realistic obviously only noticed the stiff fake movements, terrible voice acting, and LOW graphic settings, but in real life, bullets don't WHIZZ past your head with some epic hollywood sound effect, they make a snap cause the bullet itself is breaking the sound barrier, and youll hear the bullet before the gunshot, and actually, what other FPS are you gonna find that allows you to move your head independently with your body, lower your weapon, or sit down and smoke?
@Flea21xy "people who say this isnt realistic obviously only noticed the stiff fake movements, terrible voice acting, and LOW graphic settings" So they obviously only notice the things that should be realistic that aren't? Thanks for contradicting your own statement.
Definitely worth the buy if you're into combat simulation and are willing to put some hours into the game. This is no BF3 or COD, this is an entirely different case of eggs. Some people find it enjoyable because of how modular the platform itself is; you can change the game around to match your exact likes or demands and the amount of custom, player made content is astonishing. The ArmA2free version is good, but I'd recommend investing in the full kit if you're into sitting in bushes for hours.
@Chapelpants technically it depends on the gaming style, for those who like a mix of fps the people would pick bf3 but for those who likes real military simulation then it should be arma
the graphics are way better than this! He is playing on low settings. I know cause i got the game yestrday. I put everything on ultra and it looks better than BF3 no lie! like so people see!
@showrider99 I highly doubt that, PCs are always going to be the superior platform of gaming because you can modify the hardware to make it better than the Xbox and PS3 together.
@MrSairuS96 this game is several years older than BF3, and definitely far more realistic (as good as BF3 is). It's also rendering a whole country rather than 64 player maps. Now ARMA 3, that might give BF3 some competition!
@tunnelscope BF3 is nowhere near more realistic then this game... the maps are small and forced, when you die it just plops you into the middle of combat again. there is no real tactical planning involved in the average BF3 game... just run+gun basically. This game is infinitely more realistic in the sense that you are playing on an actual battlefield with large open areas and REALISTIC scenarios (rather then a building surrounded by overturned busses and narrow corridors.
BF3 Realistic? I'm pretty sure you can't take 3 rifle bullets to the head and still run around. (Don't forget the health regain! XD) Battlefield is NOWHERE near realistic! ahahahah!
@MrSkippy216 LOL! No, play Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising. That game is where you engage targets 1,000 meters away and 3 bullet hits and you're down, squad commands, squad engagements etc.
@MidnightGrunt Frankly people who claim BF3 to be realistic their just as stupid as EA's marketing team. Although I do personally find it to be nicely in the middle of sim and arcade.
@goldieownz The way you are commenting on this video gives me the impression that you have never actually played this game. Battlefield 3 has better graphics. That is about the only difference that stands out majorly. If you would like to state your opinion, i would be happy to prove you wrong.
this may be realalistic in all the tecnical ways but games like this rarely pay attention to what the man on the ground is going through. crouching and walking isnt slower when going uphill, you dont have sweat in your eyes and these guys run forever. im in the military in a combat field and though i havent fought in battle ive been in training in the heat of texas with a lightend combat load. fully armed a soldier wears out quickly in long periods of combat.
@lordzilu1584 LOL thats the biggest lie i think anyone's ever told, and that's counting Obama... ARMA has very few bugs, "few" not saying there isn't but there certainly are 100000x more in skyrim and BF3, BF3 has more bugs than any game i have ever played, no reason a vehicle should be randomly launched or pulled in random directions at mach 2.
@GMBStillFree How has BF3 got more bugs than anything you've played. That's ridiculous and if i was an arma fan i'd be insulted than you played this game. ARMA 2 had soo much more bugs to begin with and former bethesda games like daggerfall had more bugs than any game mentioned
@BlobIslandGame battlefield 3 is very far from realistic. a solider in bf3 can be a pilot a tank driver and an infantry. ARMA 2, if your an infantry. you can drive small vehicle, like a HumV. pilot F35 and all the helicopters. tanker, a range of LAVs and 2 main battle tanks. thats just 1 thing, but there is much more. i love bf3, but im pointing out thats its not realistic
@stevehbee check this guys other videos. The game is helluva lot more than Humvees and infantry. The uploader just isnt all that great at capturing the excitement of ARMA.
@TheBeastPie123 In real life, you can run for much longer than the 4-8 seconds you can in CoD... ESPECIALLY if you're really a well-trained soldier in a modern military.
Check out this website to get free stuff! It's completely free as long as you follow this link! Earn free video games, antique collectibles, and more
@AtomicGamer24 outdated? the hardware requirement to run it well is very high. They also have released expansions including a standalone one since arma 2 came out
@that18yearoldkid get it on steam. buy the operation arrowhead version or combined operations. There is a free version but its not as good as the full version
This is a Warfare Simulator (This is not about GRAPHICS!) In Afghanistan you dont run around and just shoot people and jump =(COD & BF3) ArmA 2 simulates the real military equipment, vehicles, camouflages, firearms, military symbols and other stuff. (Do you really think if you are in Afghanistan you are like in BF3? = WAR and WAR and WAR) In ArmA 2 its not whole the time battles like in BF3. Most you peacekeep Afghan villages, support supply convoys, secure towns. 10/10 in realism :)
@FinnishCrusader It's not exactly all that realistic tbh, obviously the most realistic game available to the civilian market, but VBS1 and 2 are far superior to Arma in pretty much every way in the realism section.
@FinnishCrusader Your paragraph contains an extraordinary amount of information and has surpassed the length which manages to keep my attention. Consequently, I had no gander at your materials and made to attempt to absorb the information inherit within
@Nibenni You can't fly, call in artillery, play online with people all over the world, throw grenades, choose from a wide variety of weapons, or ride in vehicles in airsoft. Not disagreeing though, as I play airsoft too.
@wwwTheHardDriverscom That's true. I can't call artillery or fly, I give you that but I travelled all over the world, throwed grenades, planted claymores and C4, activated and deactivated bombs, "shoot" a wide variety of guns/GLs and ride diverse vehicles.
@Nibenni Well I'd rather be a fag in my room than go out in public and show everyone how much of a douche I am by playing airsoft, which is played by a bunch of wannabes who think because they watched black hawk down they know military tactics.
@CARBINEZzZz Well he made no offense to insult anyone. but you did so that could only mean you dont have enough money or are to scared to play airsoft. Airsoft is for people who would like 2nd best out of a more war genre of fighting. It is alot more fun than video games so i dont know why you would even say such a thing. Not many military tactics learned from BHD but I still know alot of tactics involving stealth and maneuverability.
@CARBINEZzZz Ok, so any PC/Console player who enjoy a nice football match with his friends in the park who also plays, let's say, FIFA 2012 or PES 2012 are just a bunch of wannabes who think they know some soccer strategy because they watched Escape to Victory?
@Nibenni I would like to do that, but I find it a better deal in my opinion to buy a 200$ graphics card that can be used for all games I play, Gmod, Minecraft, ARMA 2, HL2, BF3, ect. As opposed to buying a gun and gear for air soft scrimmages. Even though I would love to do that much more than gaming.
@XxLuluLustxX Call of duty SUCK, cod 4 was good, but then.... games like bf3 and css have good balance between realism and game. Arma is too realistic, why dont go to real war if you want it? And airsoft is perfect for people who wants "real war". Good thing in games is that they dont have to be real. Best games are real, but still have some FUN elements that arent real(if you get shot once you dont bleed to death etc.)
This is one of the only Warfare Simulators. This is a civil version of a Military simulator (VBS2) what the US Army uses and other armies. This use the real military equipment and other stuff.
The Graphics are not too bad just set post process very high then it looks like BF3. The graphics are more realistic than BF3 but the graphics suck more. I can say BF3 just came out!
@Pas1logan The longer your sprint, the longer it takes for you to be able to shoot properly without your gun zigzagging all over the place, which is much more realistic thatn modern shooters where they seem to be able to only sprint for 6 seconds and then they are so phyically drained that they literally cant run any longer., they must be 400 pounds.
Real soldiers in combat situatuons are capable of incredible feats of stamina due to all the adrenaline that is released.
@KommandantSutto Sure, but I know for a fact that running around with 100 pounds of equipment will still tire you out regardless of being a hugely muscular soldier running off adrenaline. Sure, they may be able to go pretty fast and fairly far, but not for the lengths shown in the video when they weren't even under fire. Oh and let's not forget how they'd stop for a second or two to look around then keep sprinting for five years.
the most realistic shooter everyone would sit in cover the whole game cause one death and the games over.
NoodlesSotIS 2 hours ago
This looks like an old crappy game with a low budget and backyard graphics. Battlefield 3 and even MW3 would be considered more "realistic" than this.
xXFirexGodXx 2 hours ago
@xXFirexGodXx Oh come on! Even those two suck, especially CoD!
deadfishy666 38 minutes ago
DuckHunterVideos 19 hours ago
most realistic right now: battlefield 3
galvendorondo 1 day ago
@galvendorondo Battlefield 3 isn't realistic
lansio94 1 day ago
@lansio94 Your right Battlefield isn't realistic in the way that you might be thinking. Battlefield is realistic in its sounds, weapons, and graphics but it still has that gaming element. Say what you like about the game play not being realistic, I doesn't mater its a game it isn't meant to be so in-depth realistic that its a chore to play it. Battlefield has found that mix between realistic and a game.
foolbird2 1 day ago
@galvendorondo Battlefield 3 is realistic in terms of graphics but definitely not in terms of gameplay and I wouldnt call Arma 2 the most realistic either.
The most realistic game I've played is Red Orchestra 2. It's extremely realistic as hell.
Xorgmaster 16 hours ago
first thing that pops up after seeing `most realistic war game` is ``we CHARGE into enemy territory`` did you blindly get shot... lets find out
thejonathan130 1 day ago
people who say this isnt realistic obviously only noticed the stiff fake movements, terrible voice acting, and LOW graphic settings, but in real life, bullets don't WHIZZ past your head with some epic hollywood sound effect, they make a snap cause the bullet itself is breaking the sound barrier, and youll hear the bullet before the gunshot, and actually, what other FPS are you gonna find that allows you to move your head independently with your body, lower your weapon, or sit down and smoke?
Flea21xy 1 day ago
@Flea21xy "people who say this isnt realistic obviously only noticed the stiff fake movements, terrible voice acting, and LOW graphic settings" So they obviously only notice the things that should be realistic that aren't? Thanks for contradicting your own statement.
Uzimaki91 20 hours ago
I hope you don't mean that this is anything like real life.
nancykilledjon 1 day ago
haters
Driston4030 1 day ago
Definitely worth the buy if you're into combat simulation and are willing to put some hours into the game. This is no BF3 or COD, this is an entirely different case of eggs. Some people find it enjoyable because of how modular the platform itself is; you can change the game around to match your exact likes or demands and the amount of custom, player made content is astonishing. The ArmA2free version is good, but I'd recommend investing in the full kit if you're into sitting in bushes for hours.
M3g4f4g3000 1 day ago
is this like a battlefield3?
TheGamer766 2 days ago
@TheGamer766 lol, no, bf3 is nothing like this pretty much and is like, 100x better
Chapelpants 2 days ago
@Chapelpants technically it depends on the gaming style, for those who like a mix of fps the people would pick bf3 but for those who likes real military simulation then it should be arma
reallink2000 2 days ago
is it a game and if it is what is it?
zizoayoub5 2 days ago
They must be drinking 5 Hour Energy...
PineappleGamer12 2 days ago
it's nice but...sometimes people just want to play a game...
xur8761 3 days ago
can you use sniper rifles.?
motoCrossRider211 3 days ago
@motoCrossRider211 yea, but it's hella dificult to use..
ZombieHuntersInt 3 days ago
The little sound effects of the fly trip me out
Bran0n909 3 days ago
Svenson must be an idiot.
Mistercharming 3 days ago
For a second I thought it was in real life.
realwarrior250 3 days ago
BATTLEFIED 3 > This garbage
mud21995 3 days ago
My favorite game - Battleground Europe
This game is almost JUST like that except focused on modern combat.
I am SO going to try to get this to work on my Mac
AceofWWII 4 days ago
AMAZING!!!!!!!!! <3 Beautiful game... very nice video you got one of my thumbs up... I DONT NORMALLY GIVE THUMBS UP! :)
NeverShoutJake 4 days ago
people that disliked it is probably cause of the graphics, but they dont realize a military sim aims for the gameplay not purely on graphics
sawyerbobby 4 days ago
1,556 people find Call of Duty realistic
amazingman40 4 days ago
adding frostbite 2 engine to this might kill every computer in a 5 km radius
tommmiin 4 days ago
Q lixo é esse,BattleField 3 é muito melhor.
caiooguisso 4 days ago
Hey guys heres a secret bf3 isnt real at all (::(::
sefsfsesefsefsefsefs 4 days ago
@sefsfsesefsefsefsefs Heres a secret this isn't bf shit 3.
Churlishh 4 days ago
this suck!
JamWolfify 4 days ago
This is battlefield's failed abortion.....
nukehappy007 4 days ago
@nukehappy007 sorry but a lot of people like realism. it's more of the other way around friend
dogbone222 4 days ago
guys, it is basically Battlefield 3 minus Frostbite 2 engine (the destruction and graphic filter), so yeah, this is awesome
leonpacifist1988 5 days ago
@leonpacifist1988 nonononononononono! This is sooo much better than BF3. Iam a big fan of BF, and i love bf3, but this game goes home with the gold!
eirikol1 4 days ago
the graphics are way better than this! He is playing on low settings. I know cause i got the game yestrday. I put everything on ultra and it looks better than BF3 no lie! like so people see!
TheEPICskwock 5 days ago
@TheEPICskwock Nope...
Frostcrag64 5 days ago
battlefield 3 has better quality
TheWalkingDeadVEVO 6 days ago
@TheWalkingDeadVEVO this is free and battlefield is not
BoomBoomBANification 5 days ago
Probably realistic if it was on console..
showrider99 6 days ago
@showrider99 I highly doubt that, PCs are always going to be the superior platform of gaming because you can modify the hardware to make it better than the Xbox and PS3 together.
simok97 3 days ago
This looks awesome
Jiffybme1 6 days ago
Richard Nixon is his team leader!!! holy crap!!
theown32 6 days ago
@theown32 Holy scheisse.
simok97 3 days ago
i felt like i was gonna get rick rolled! :D
CheeseyPie12 6 days ago
bf3 in opinion looks better
MrSairuS96 6 days ago
@MrSairuS96 this game is several years older than BF3, and definitely far more realistic (as good as BF3 is). It's also rendering a whole country rather than 64 player maps. Now ARMA 3, that might give BF3 some competition!
DrAnonPony 6 days ago
do i need an amazing graphics card to play
Shweddyballz 1 week ago
Suddenly, BF3.
tunnelscope 1 week ago
@tunnelscope BF3 is nowhere near more realistic then this game... the maps are small and forced, when you die it just plops you into the middle of combat again. there is no real tactical planning involved in the average BF3 game... just run+gun basically. This game is infinitely more realistic in the sense that you are playing on an actual battlefield with large open areas and REALISTIC scenarios (rather then a building surrounded by overturned busses and narrow corridors.
This is realistic.
rock0nm8 1 week ago
@rock0nm8 i think you are thinking of call of duty
NJStreetSurfers 1 week ago
Damn.for free!
dannyorozco99 1 week ago
its good it could use some graphic improvements tho
GEOSKITZEN 1 week ago
@GEOSKITZEN this is the first in the series, check Arma 3..need to build a bad ass computer to play that one.
aPIMPnameMOSES 1 week ago
BF3 Realistic? I'm pretty sure you can't take 3 rifle bullets to the head and still run around. (Don't forget the health regain! XD) Battlefield is NOWHERE near realistic! ahahahah!
SolidKore 1 week ago
Guys cod and bf3 ain't realistic in real life you don't jump out on the killzone like an idiot and real one hit one kill
lilfr33zify 1 week ago
dude, bf3 is waaaaay more realistic
MrSkippy216 1 week ago
@MrSkippy216 LOL! No, play Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising. That game is where you engage targets 1,000 meters away and 3 bullet hits and you're down, squad commands, squad engagements etc.
BF3 is as realistic as CoD.
MidnightGrunt 1 week ago
@MidnightGrunt Frankly people who claim BF3 to be realistic their just as stupid as EA's marketing team. Although I do personally find it to be nicely in the middle of sim and arcade.
TheUnknownsock 1 week ago
no tp?
alex38024 1 week ago
:3 looks awesome.. Downloading it atm
teamALIAStv 1 week ago
Reminds me so much of Delta Force 1&2 :)
deadted1337 1 week ago
Rather play this then COD, any day.
thunderwind13 1 week ago
this is the most action-packed gameplay i have ever seen!!!
kobefan012345 1 week ago
what is the name on the game?
BlackArms97 1 week ago
@BlackArms97 Pong
matthewgroen 1 week ago
@BlackArms97
Are you blind or stupid?
Shamanstyle 1 week ago
@BlackArms97 Arma 2, check out my channel i have tons of videos of it
GMBStillFree 1 week ago
BF3
rambo1999bauer 1 week ago
battlefield 3 is better than that
goldieownz 1 week ago
@goldieownz The way you are commenting on this video gives me the impression that you have never actually played this game. Battlefield 3 has better graphics. That is about the only difference that stands out majorly. If you would like to state your opinion, i would be happy to prove you wrong.
XxLilSavagexX72 1 week ago
@goldieownz damn he got yo ass lol
planetminecraft100 1 week ago
@goldieownz minus all the fake and gay things the DEVS added....BF3 is sooo fake its hard to take seriously.
TheEmarbe 1 week ago
@goldieownz What's better? only the graphics are better, but this is a war game simulator, not a fun game like BF3
falclao 1 week ago
this may be realalistic in all the tecnical ways but games like this rarely pay attention to what the man on the ground is going through. crouching and walking isnt slower when going uphill, you dont have sweat in your eyes and these guys run forever. im in the military in a combat field and though i havent fought in battle ive been in training in the heat of texas with a lightend combat load. fully armed a soldier wears out quickly in long periods of combat.
voskoff7 1 week ago
The most realistic war game is Skyrim
lordzilu1584 1 week ago
@lordzilu1584 You mean skyrim the buggy game simulator?
xDevenge 1 week ago
@xDevenge This game ARMA has more bugs than Skyrim
Skyrim is very stable on PC
lordzilu1584 1 week ago
@lordzilu1584 LOL thats the biggest lie i think anyone's ever told, and that's counting Obama... ARMA has very few bugs, "few" not saying there isn't but there certainly are 100000x more in skyrim and BF3, BF3 has more bugs than any game i have ever played, no reason a vehicle should be randomly launched or pulled in random directions at mach 2.
GMBStillFree 1 week ago
@GMBStillFree How has BF3 got more bugs than anything you've played. That's ridiculous and if i was an arma fan i'd be insulted than you played this game. ARMA 2 had soo much more bugs to begin with and former bethesda games like daggerfall had more bugs than any game mentioned
imakegamesmate 1 week ago
@lordzilu1584 okay, go into a modern war with a sword. and scream at people, see if they fly away. Do you have any common sense?
TheKaiTik 1 week ago
@TheKaiTik go into a modern war and do a 360 no scope with barret.
tandis97 1 week ago
@tandis97 oh god, i hope no one goes into the war by playing call of duty. it would be funny to see someone do that though
TheKaiTik 1 week ago
@TheKaiTik lol yea, they'll start rushing, quick scoping and noob tubing hoping to kill somebody. lol
samviddo360 1 week ago
@lordzilu1584 bullshit
ancientsea1 1 week ago
I was expecting BF3 :D
BlobIslandGame 1 week ago
@BlobIslandGame battlefield 3 is very far from realistic. a solider in bf3 can be a pilot a tank driver and an infantry. ARMA 2, if your an infantry. you can drive small vehicle, like a HumV. pilot F35 and all the helicopters. tanker, a range of LAVs and 2 main battle tanks. thats just 1 thing, but there is much more. i love bf3, but im pointing out thats its not realistic
stevehbee 1 week ago
@stevehbee check this guys other videos. The game is helluva lot more than Humvees and infantry. The uploader just isnt all that great at capturing the excitement of ARMA.
Wickedashtray 1 week ago
i dont think looking at yourself from behind is realistic at all
Portapotty98 1 week ago
so you get to run a..... lot! oh fun!
persevere67 1 week ago
hey look you put the red dot in the middle of your screen HEUEHEUHEUE
Fricotjuh 1 week ago
/watch?v=DMb0ZP6hnkc&feature=related
Whiting1289 1 week ago
track/cross country video game?
ACushTheBoss 1 week ago
@ACushTheBoss Nope, its a simulator.
GMBStillFree 1 week ago
hey look its mw3
iSaluteCookies 2 weeks ago
if its supposed to be realistic why is there a crosshair >.>
bestlad123 2 weeks ago
@bestlad123 it can be turned off, there are many things oh his display that can be removed, the graphics are also exceptional.
GMBStillFree 2 weeks ago
i think in some FPS games, it should be compulsory to have a headset, and when anyone talks people in the close vicinity can hear them
garethkielty 2 weeks ago
@garethkielty socom
fez6011 1 week ago
Do you play ACE mod?
KamikazeScarecrows 2 weeks ago
@Loubacca true atheism is for idiots
shockofgod 2 weeks ago
looks like camp city
jjayreed10 2 weeks ago
looks like cod in a pc
Naruto4458 2 weeks ago
@Naruto4458 All COD games are also on PC...
mikemhz 2 weeks ago
@mikemhz Not call of duty 3...
Justin141415 2 weeks ago
im downloading so i hope this aint a virus
Hellsdevil19 2 weeks ago
mw3 looks way better
YuNOmeme 2 weeks ago
arma is a joke they say "real" lol the reloading is a JOKE lol they could of done way better on that
jason829000829 2 weeks ago
so sprinting non stop is realistic
TheBeastPie123 2 weeks ago
@TheBeastPie123 In real life, you can run for much longer than the 4-8 seconds you can in CoD... ESPECIALLY if you're really a well-trained soldier in a modern military.
velcroboy60000 2 weeks ago
@velcroboy60000 In real life, war ain't a game and respawning doesn't exist, so people should stop comparing those 2 things with eachother
Sjoerdtje 2 weeks ago
@velcroboy60000 Im not comparing it to a wussy cod
TheBeastPie123 2 weeks ago
listia.com/signup/1311718
Check out this website to get free stuff! It's completely free as long as you follow this link! Earn free video games, antique collectibles, and more
MusicTrekk 2 weeks ago
@AtomicGamer24 outdated? the hardware requirement to run it well is very high. They also have released expansions including a standalone one since arma 2 came out
heroofwinds9 2 weeks ago
Where can I get Arma? Honestly i want it so bad, all i see are cool mods and sweet vids.
that18yearoldkid 2 weeks ago
@that18yearoldkid get it on steam. buy the operation arrowhead version or combined operations. There is a free version but its not as good as the full version
heroofwinds9 2 weeks ago
BF3 has destructive enviroment ARMA DOES NOT HOW IS THAT REALISTIC? BF3 IS MORE REALISTIC
Punkrock3011 2 weeks ago
@Punkrock3011 Its the pacing and scale of ARMA that make it more realistic
Epsilonsquad 2 weeks ago
@Punkrock3011
Arma has a destructive environment.
mayhem380 2 weeks ago
@Punkrock3011 it has destructive buildings
heroofwinds9 2 weeks ago
GO PLAY BATTLEFIELD 3
doggyxd047 2 weeks ago
@doggyxd047 bf3 compared to arma sucks
fortifythamind 1 week ago
go play BadCompany 2
enkuenku 2 weeks ago
This is a Warfare Simulator (This is not about GRAPHICS!) In Afghanistan you dont run around and just shoot people and jump =(COD & BF3) ArmA 2 simulates the real military equipment, vehicles, camouflages, firearms, military symbols and other stuff. (Do you really think if you are in Afghanistan you are like in BF3? = WAR and WAR and WAR) In ArmA 2 its not whole the time battles like in BF3. Most you peacekeep Afghan villages, support supply convoys, secure towns. 10/10 in realism :)
FinnishCrusader 2 weeks ago
@FinnishCrusader It's not exactly all that realistic tbh, obviously the most realistic game available to the civilian market, but VBS1 and 2 are far superior to Arma in pretty much every way in the realism section.
Aaidas2 2 weeks ago
@FinnishCrusader Your paragraph contains an extraordinary amount of information and has surpassed the length which manages to keep my attention. Consequently, I had no gander at your materials and made to attempt to absorb the information inherit within
jaggarnotify 2 weeks ago
ps3 games are better
Shadowdaahedgehog 2 weeks ago
@Shadowdaahedgehog fuck off
ThePsychoMafia 2 weeks ago
bf3 has better grapichs
FrozenKing142 2 weeks ago
@FrozenKing142 no shit its not all about graphics you moron.
ThePsychoMafia 2 weeks ago
@FrozenKing142 bf3 has just come out this was uploaded 2011 you dipshit.
ThePsychoMafia 2 weeks ago
this is the slowest paced game in the history of games
SpaceCaptainBill 2 weeks ago
@SpaceCaptainBill You should play CoD4 on hardcore for the PC. THAT rivals this..
Un1234l 2 weeks ago
Just for the record...
When I want to play some realistic (and at times boring) FPS I just play Airsoft with my friends.
I prefer to spend 150$ or more on a "fake gun" than on a new graphic card.
Nibenni 2 weeks ago
@Nibenni lol good point....I have to agree with that :-)
shockofgod 2 weeks ago
@Nibenni You can't fly, call in artillery, play online with people all over the world, throw grenades, choose from a wide variety of weapons, or ride in vehicles in airsoft. Not disagreeing though, as I play airsoft too.
wwwTheHardDriverscom 2 weeks ago
@wwwTheHardDriverscom That's true. I can't call artillery or fly, I give you that but I travelled all over the world, throwed grenades, planted claymores and C4, activated and deactivated bombs, "shoot" a wide variety of guns/GLs and ride diverse vehicles.
Nibenni 2 weeks ago
@Nibenni That is pretty cool. I wish we had vehicles in airsoft around here.
wwwTheHardDriverscom 2 weeks ago
@Nibenni its ok
gans9266 2 weeks ago
@Nibenni Fuck off game videos then
couer1911 2 weeks ago
@Nibenni I agree with you
MXSXIXFR3AK 2 weeks ago
@Nibenni Well I'd rather be a fag in my room than go out in public and show everyone how much of a douche I am by playing airsoft, which is played by a bunch of wannabes who think because they watched black hawk down they know military tactics.
CARBINEZzZz 2 weeks ago
@CARBINEZzZz Well he made no offense to insult anyone. but you did so that could only mean you dont have enough money or are to scared to play airsoft. Airsoft is for people who would like 2nd best out of a more war genre of fighting. It is alot more fun than video games so i dont know why you would even say such a thing. Not many military tactics learned from BHD but I still know alot of tactics involving stealth and maneuverability.
RyeSC 2 weeks ago
@CARBINEZzZz Ok, so any PC/Console player who enjoy a nice football match with his friends in the park who also plays, let's say, FIFA 2012 or PES 2012 are just a bunch of wannabes who think they know some soccer strategy because they watched Escape to Victory?
Nibenni 2 weeks ago
@Nibenni I would like to do that, but I find it a better deal in my opinion to buy a 200$ graphics card that can be used for all games I play, Gmod, Minecraft, ARMA 2, HL2, BF3, ect. As opposed to buying a gun and gear for air soft scrimmages. Even though I would love to do that much more than gaming.
0zyke 2 weeks ago
@Nibenni you can't die though.
TheBlackBritt 2 weeks ago
@Nibenni You'd rather spend 150$ on an air soft gun? You be crazy man!
jasong2004 1 week ago
@Nibenni is playing Airsoft fun? i really would like to test it out :) i have to airsoft pistols but actually never tried them out on my friends :/
dront6 1 week ago
@Nibenni But what if my friends dont have airsoft guns?(like they dont have money)xD Or they dont even want to play?
viktoytube 1 week ago
@Nibenni I'd rather play paintball
DanKDaZeHD 1 week ago
Gameplay is so slow
AsianVsBlack 2 weeks ago
Thats mayby realistic, but BOOOOORIIIIINNGGG
vanhakaveri 2 weeks ago
@vanhakaveri Go back to call of duty than kid. This is on of the best fps out there, call of duty scrubs can't reconize true value in a game.
XxLuluLustxX 2 weeks ago
@XxLuluLustxX Call of duty SUCK, cod 4 was good, but then.... games like bf3 and css have good balance between realism and game. Arma is too realistic, why dont go to real war if you want it? And airsoft is perfect for people who wants "real war". Good thing in games is that they dont have to be real. Best games are real, but still have some FUN elements that arent real(if you get shot once you dont bleed to death etc.)
vanhakaveri 2 weeks ago
@vanhakaveri no you just dont understand the finer points of military tactics
royfireball1 2 weeks ago
at the end u should have used the m203 GL that u had when it drove away
mksewell1 2 weeks ago
At first I thought it was a video game, then I realize it was the real thing...
JVThrillz 2 weeks ago
This is one of the only Warfare Simulators. This is a civil version of a Military simulator (VBS2) what the US Army uses and other armies. This use the real military equipment and other stuff.
FinnishCrusader 2 weeks ago
The Graphics are not too bad just set post process very high then it looks like BF3. The graphics are more realistic than BF3 but the graphics suck more. I can say BF3 just came out!
FinnishCrusader 2 weeks ago
Well, if you look at the GAMEPLAY, it may be realistic, but the graphics are shit.
Also, can you break stuff like in BF Bad company?
TheRealDoctorBonkus 2 weeks ago
@TheRealDoctorBonkus every structure can be destroyed here... but not with ragdoll.
FinnishCrusader 2 weeks ago
@TheRealDoctorBonkus arma 2 has excellent graphics when they are set to max, you need a mean PC to run this game full power.
GMBStillFree 2 weeks ago
some textures and sounds need to be worked on, but apart from the the gameplay looks very realistic, nice job
Gengabelly313 2 weeks ago
what game?
misterchoc225 2 weeks ago
Oh yeah, because sprinting forever is totally realistic.
Pas1logan 2 weeks ago
@Pas1logan The longer your sprint, the longer it takes for you to be able to shoot properly without your gun zigzagging all over the place, which is much more realistic thatn modern shooters where they seem to be able to only sprint for 6 seconds and then they are so phyically drained that they literally cant run any longer., they must be 400 pounds.
Real soldiers in combat situatuons are capable of incredible feats of stamina due to all the adrenaline that is released.
KommandantSutto 2 weeks ago
@KommandantSutto Sure, but I know for a fact that running around with 100 pounds of equipment will still tire you out regardless of being a hugely muscular soldier running off adrenaline. Sure, they may be able to go pretty fast and fairly far, but not for the lengths shown in the video when they weren't even under fire. Oh and let's not forget how they'd stop for a second or two to look around then keep sprinting for five years.
Pas1logan 2 weeks ago
@Pas1logan yeah i prefer battlefield any day than this shit
pkwva 2 weeks ago
que jogo podre!!!
rrrroberto100 2 weeks ago