you guys need to do some traveling. there is nothing illegal about this magazine, it's cute young girls, clothed, and in swimwear. there is never any nudity. the magazine celebrates young innocence, cuteness, freshness, hope and purity. everything us American have lost. if you look at this and have perverted thoughts, that says more about you than about the magazine.
@RamieIeMaIubayMusic If you are trying to say that the U.S. is as bad as Japan with regards to state sanctioned child pornography, you are gravely mistaken. Child pornography was only outlawed in Japan in 1999! It is still not illlegal now if you include manga/anime. In my opinion and from my experience sex with minors is not considered immoral by many in Japan.
@BillyFeynman In no way am I condoning or supporting these molesters, but isn't the age of consent in Japan much lower, like 13 I think? Wouldn't that explain why lolita anime/manga and junior idols are so popular there?
what about the laws on japan, do they have laws agains someone who has sex with minor its considered illegal? i mean.. i wouldn't like of a dude have sex with a 10 year old, natural thinking, 10 years old you are not even close to have a properly developed body or mind to actually consider sex, also.. i mean... not even animals have sex with young animals,, its just stupid to consider the idea.
@drazapatos PS- Asides from the fact that there is no evidence that magazines provides incentives for men to rape, IF a simple picture of a girl is enough incentive for a man to rape a girl, then pretty much ANYTHING woulda done the trick already. They're already rapists, with or without dirty magazines. It's not the magazine's problem in that case, but the population's.
Scapegoating the media is counterproductive. It's like blaming Doom for the Columbine Massacre.
obviously it is each individuals mind to blame about bad things, it is just as what shakespear said long time ago "there is nothing that is bad or good on this world, but thinking makes it so". like i said before i would personnally feel bad if i were reading this magazines thats all. if you like to watch young girls with swimsuits or schoolgirl uniforms and that doesn't bother you its ok... as long as you don't rape lol.
@woollymanmoth. pedophiles and theiy patethic excuses dude dont come here with such a shit because in america we do have all that ok BUT WITH GIRLS AS 18 AND UP NOT LITTLE UNDERAGE GIRLS AS 14 11 AMD EVEN 3 BECAUSE I DO SEE THIS IDOL PHOTOBOOKS U-3 (underage - 3) pictures of little girls in sexual pose is gross and promote child rape .dont be stupid dude.
@meow23 There's no point in arguing with you since you obviously can't discern the difference between Moecco and child rape. That's okay, keep promoting the image of young girls smoking cigarettes on your home page. While we're at it, let's go ahead and bring Joe Camel back and he can lure kinds into smoking right along with you. It's the cool thing to do right, because you saw it on an anime. On second thought, how about we just don't judge each other since everyone has a different view.
@woollymanmoth thank god united states don't allow shit like this. i found gross people like you who always said dumb shit as a excuse to try to justify attraction and sexual desire for child's. and i agree with a lot of comments down here not even animals have sex with young animals. this girls don't even know or have a idea about what is sex a 1415 11 12 10 6 3 years old don't have the desire of sex OK. a 18 woman is beautiful 2. "idol" DVDs and magazines like this are ANTINATURAL SO EAT THAT
@meow23 I'm pretty sure Moecco isn't shooting 3 year olds, and just to be fair, the US does have child beauty pageants which are way scarier. I will concede though, over all with your passion alone you've won the debate. I'm glad we could work this out like humans.
@woollymanmoth lol I hope you're kidding. Look closely when the guy flips the pages and check the positions of the girls. Or the kind of swinsuits they are wearing. It's not porn but it is suggesting an idea based on sex and kawai attitude. Idol sells well to pedo. Japan lost its purity too.
its sad, it really is. and most parents doesnt have anything against it... :( and i think its barely within the laws, but if you did something like that in US... i doubt you would live long.
so whats underaged according to japan? and i mean.. i do understand japan culture, but don't you think that putting little girls to do that will create a great bad concept towards other countries? the reason i say that its cuz in my country selling pictures of little girls, even if they aren't naked its considered pedofilia OR, it is looked bad because it creates a bad incentive on men, in other words it could promote rape to childs and what not. i dont look it bad but others could.
@drazapatos Underage range from 13-18 depending on the area. 13 and 18 being both equally rare. And why should Japan, or any other country, care about what other countries think? Every country is different. Look at Canada's lax judicial system. Or America's lawsuit-happy nature. Equating pictures of young girls with pedophilia is just an overreaction thanks to the "think of the children!" mindset politicians use for easy votes. Lastly, countries more lax about these things have LESS rape.
then why are they only picturing pictures of girls only? how about they put pictures of boys also... then at least i know this magazine isn't just targeting males only but also families and females, i do understand japanese culture, i know most of their mind set it is not focused on perversion towards underage childs, i just can't have the thought of myself sitting on a crowded area reading and watching this magazines, i don't know what would they think of me lol.
@drazapatos There are male equivalents of such magazines. Those are mostly aimed at older female audiences. As for why there aren't magazines aimed at both gender audiences, well have you ever seen girls watch Dragon Ball? Have you seen any boys look at women's magazine about perfumes? Excluding rare exceptions of course. All magazines aim at specific demographics. Those who aim for too broad a demographic end up barely selling any.
This has been flagged as spam show
You can get your romance tour to Brazil now **rockmycity.info**
tanekavillelafmk 11 months ago
lol..pedo paradise..
RainbowCountry92 1 year ago
i think it cool you can buy on the high street in Japan
IdolWorldDirect 1 year ago
Cum on the book is not bad.
itti1977 1 year ago
you guys need to do some traveling. there is nothing illegal about this magazine, it's cute young girls, clothed, and in swimwear. there is never any nudity. the magazine celebrates young innocence, cuteness, freshness, hope and purity. everything us American have lost. if you look at this and have perverted thoughts, that says more about you than about the magazine.
woollymanmoth 1 year ago 6
Comment removed
BillyFeynman 1 year ago
@BillyFeynman What about men in America who have cheerleader fetishes? That's the same concept.
RamieIeMaIubayMusic 1 year ago
@RamieIeMaIubayMusic If you are trying to say that the U.S. is as bad as Japan with regards to state sanctioned child pornography, you are gravely mistaken. Child pornography was only outlawed in Japan in 1999! It is still not illlegal now if you include manga/anime. In my opinion and from my experience sex with minors is not considered immoral by many in Japan.
BillyFeynman 1 year ago
@BillyFeynman In no way am I condoning or supporting these molesters, but isn't the age of consent in Japan much lower, like 13 I think? Wouldn't that explain why lolita anime/manga and junior idols are so popular there?
RamieIeMaIubayMusic 1 year ago
@BillyFeynman
what about the laws on japan, do they have laws agains someone who has sex with minor its considered illegal? i mean.. i wouldn't like of a dude have sex with a 10 year old, natural thinking, 10 years old you are not even close to have a properly developed body or mind to actually consider sex, also.. i mean... not even animals have sex with young animals,, its just stupid to consider the idea.
drazapatos 1 year ago
@drazapatos PS- Asides from the fact that there is no evidence that magazines provides incentives for men to rape, IF a simple picture of a girl is enough incentive for a man to rape a girl, then pretty much ANYTHING woulda done the trick already. They're already rapists, with or without dirty magazines. It's not the magazine's problem in that case, but the population's.
Scapegoating the media is counterproductive. It's like blaming Doom for the Columbine Massacre.
G1ingy 1 year ago
@G1ingy
obviously it is each individuals mind to blame about bad things, it is just as what shakespear said long time ago "there is nothing that is bad or good on this world, but thinking makes it so". like i said before i would personnally feel bad if i were reading this magazines thats all. if you like to watch young girls with swimsuits or schoolgirl uniforms and that doesn't bother you its ok... as long as you don't rape lol.
drazapatos 1 year ago
@RamieIeMaIubayMusic
dude in america cheerleaders aren't childrens. >o
drazapatos 1 year ago
@woollymanmoth. pedophiles and theiy patethic excuses dude dont come here with such a shit because in america we do have all that ok BUT WITH GIRLS AS 18 AND UP NOT LITTLE UNDERAGE GIRLS AS 14 11 AMD EVEN 3 BECAUSE I DO SEE THIS IDOL PHOTOBOOKS U-3 (underage - 3) pictures of little girls in sexual pose is gross and promote child rape .dont be stupid dude.
meow23 8 months ago
@meow23 There's no point in arguing with you since you obviously can't discern the difference between Moecco and child rape. That's okay, keep promoting the image of young girls smoking cigarettes on your home page. While we're at it, let's go ahead and bring Joe Camel back and he can lure kinds into smoking right along with you. It's the cool thing to do right, because you saw it on an anime. On second thought, how about we just don't judge each other since everyone has a different view.
woollymanmoth 8 months ago
@woollymanmoth thank god united states don't allow shit like this. i found gross people like you who always said dumb shit as a excuse to try to justify attraction and sexual desire for child's. and i agree with a lot of comments down here not even animals have sex with young animals. this girls don't even know or have a idea about what is sex a 1415 11 12 10 6 3 years old don't have the desire of sex OK. a 18 woman is beautiful 2. "idol" DVDs and magazines like this are ANTINATURAL SO EAT THAT
meow23 8 months ago
@meow23 I'm pretty sure Moecco isn't shooting 3 year olds, and just to be fair, the US does have child beauty pageants which are way scarier. I will concede though, over all with your passion alone you've won the debate. I'm glad we could work this out like humans.
woollymanmoth 8 months ago
@woollymanmoth lol I hope you're kidding. Look closely when the guy flips the pages and check the positions of the girls. Or the kind of swinsuits they are wearing. It's not porn but it is suggesting an idea based on sex and kawai attitude. Idol sells well to pedo. Japan lost its purity too.
frostieschocopop 5 months ago
wow is great the magazine in chilean is mis 17 ^^, beatifull lady's
Cosmozero77 1 year ago
Comment removed
JokersKryptonite 1 year ago
You flipped the pages too damn fast!!!!
captkronoscorvinus 1 year ago
its sad, it really is. and most parents doesnt have anything against it... :( and i think its barely within the laws, but if you did something like that in US... i doubt you would live long.
chegvold 1 year ago
its illegal if there is nudity.
judesama11 1 year ago
wow... are they underage??? that is ILLEGAL >O
drazapatos 1 year ago
@drazapatos They're underaged by mostly WESTERN standards...Japan isn't a western country...
G1ingy 1 year ago
@G1ingy
so whats underaged according to japan? and i mean.. i do understand japan culture, but don't you think that putting little girls to do that will create a great bad concept towards other countries? the reason i say that its cuz in my country selling pictures of little girls, even if they aren't naked its considered pedofilia OR, it is looked bad because it creates a bad incentive on men, in other words it could promote rape to childs and what not. i dont look it bad but others could.
drazapatos 1 year ago
@drazapatos Underage range from 13-18 depending on the area. 13 and 18 being both equally rare. And why should Japan, or any other country, care about what other countries think? Every country is different. Look at Canada's lax judicial system. Or America's lawsuit-happy nature. Equating pictures of young girls with pedophilia is just an overreaction thanks to the "think of the children!" mindset politicians use for easy votes. Lastly, countries more lax about these things have LESS rape.
G1ingy 1 year ago
@G1ingy
then why are they only picturing pictures of girls only? how about they put pictures of boys also... then at least i know this magazine isn't just targeting males only but also families and females, i do understand japanese culture, i know most of their mind set it is not focused on perversion towards underage childs, i just can't have the thought of myself sitting on a crowded area reading and watching this magazines, i don't know what would they think of me lol.
drazapatos 1 year ago
@drazapatos There are male equivalents of such magazines. Those are mostly aimed at older female audiences. As for why there aren't magazines aimed at both gender audiences, well have you ever seen girls watch Dragon Ball? Have you seen any boys look at women's magazine about perfumes? Excluding rare exceptions of course. All magazines aim at specific demographics. Those who aim for too broad a demographic end up barely selling any.
G1ingy 1 year ago
Comment removed
G1ingy 1 year ago