@pacrat90 yes usually, but this was a Bombardier Q400. It has 2 turbo props and would shoot off (possibly into the cabin) if the aircraft were landed on its belly.
@MYBIGKINDHEART Its a dash 8 ( also known as crash 8) made by Bombardier in Canada. a good airplane except for the landing gear that SUCKS ! SAS (Scandinavian airlines) sold of all of their dash 8 Q400 after their costumers lost faith in them.
@Sjusovare2 thats the problem with anything nowadays , if they wasn't so focused on how much money they'd make instead of making a good product and in this case an airplane then things would work better but until people motivation will be chanelled in the right positive direction instead of money motavation then nothing will work properly, well thats how i see it anyway in some cases at least
I guess there's a good reason why not, but in cases where they know a nose wheel has failed before they land, why can't the airport spray a narrow strip of foam down the centreline to prevent the nose generating sparks and maybe a fire. As long as the pilot keeps the main gear either side of the foam it shouldn't affect braking.
@sinojmanXD Made in Canada by Bombardier and operated by a world class Japanese airline. This model of aircraft has had several similar incidents over time, however, maintains a good safety record.
Since these Dash-8's land without the nose gear so often, they should put a couple of small wheels to either side of the front gear well doors. Or at least a skid pad
@SeamusCallan1 Mechanical failure - NOT pilot error. When a pilot selects 'gear down', ALL wheels are supposed to come down at once. The pilot does not have a choice of which wheels to put down (same on all aircraft).
@c53204 Wow, really???? I guess you are not familiar with satire. You do realize I was joking???? Right??? Please tell me you realize I was NOT being serious. I usually do respond to people that are not smart enough to spot obvious satire........but common! Really?
@SeamusCallan1 No, on the contrary. Have you read some of the idiot posts you get on here (many are mine - satire). As I don't know you and I am unable (yet) to use the internet to read peoples minds, I have to assume that your satire does not include posting on a video that potentially could have been very serious, or even fatal for some or all of the passengers (sarcasm).
@c53204 Well, since the title stated it was an "emergency", most semi-intelligent people would have realized that "he should have put down the front landing gear" is not a serious comment. Good luck with educating the world.
just flew with a Q400, it is ok and much less noisy than expected. hope the maintenance guys take care of the landing gears as i will fly back on friday with the same bird:)
I was just watching a youporn video of some hot blonde masturbating in the shower, and I totally had a massive load blow. Some went on my face, some over my face to the back of the chair. That video was way better then this one.
@abrar4623 it's actually better if the engines are running because then if it catches fire then the fire can be ingested by the engine, there's still fuel than can be ignited even if the engine is shutdown
aaah people are saying :oh amazing pilot" well yes he was but if u ask me he still should have cut the engines just before touchdown as a saftey percaution i mean i know he knew it was high enough the engines wouldnt hit but still idk...
@thebigrigtrucker I Know that's Standard when doing emergency checks but maby he left them on so that he can still have i bit of directional control using the engines
I guess the only reason you'd shut down your props would be if they were in risk of hitting the ground, so a low mounted wing with props on it would need to be shut down in order to stop the risk of additional damage from the propellers breaking off. Since this plane is a top-mounted wing, i guess there's no real problem of leaving them on.
@AceOfSpades678 I've never seen a video of where the propellers separated, I could be totally wrong though. However, from what I've heard, the reason you shut down the engine is to not cause more damage to the engine.
@jetfighter2011 I have in my hot little hand a copy of CAA New Zealand's November/December 2009 Vector magazine. on the cover is a truly awesome photo of a Beech 1900D belly landing somewhere in New Zealand. Don't know if you can google this mag and see the pic but I can tell you that there are a s..tload of props flying off! Alloy blades just bend. Composite blades don't!!
@jetfighter2011 Just googled it and it's there. Google CAA vector magazine 2009 and you'll find the mags. Download that issue and open it with adobe reader then zoom that awesome pic. You'll have to look up high for a couple of the blades. I can count 5 blades on their way...the rest are already gone I think.
It is the same type of aircraft as the ones SAS had. They had many problems with the Q-400/800 flights from Bombardier. SAS has now sold all these aircrafts to other airline companies worldwide. Bombardier has compensated SAS with new aircrafts called CRJ and of course a lot of money.
"He probobaly... caused a bit less damage to the plane. "
THEY ALMOST RUN OUT OF RUNWAY THATS WHY THE WHERE FORCED TO DROP THE NOSE EARLY.THE AIRCRAFT CAME TO A COMPLETE STOP JUST AFTER THE THRESHOLD LUCKILY IN THE SAFETY ZONE OF THE PAVED RUNWAY.
The one that alerts my most is that they DIDN'T EVACUATE at least for 3 minutes.Not only that,the fire trucks with terrible aim they threw firefighting material everywhere,making the evacuation even harde
@AtariAndre42 You wouldnt want to brake too much, otherwise the nose will slam down, that pilot probably just held the nose up using aerodynamic braking by keeping the wing at a higher AOA, which will bring her down nice and gently :)
This type of landing is not particularly high risk. This aircraft does not strike the propellor blades when it lands without a nosewheel, so that danger is averted. The rudder is effective to a certain extent and the brakes can be used along with power to control direction. Why does nearly all the public and a good number of pilots think that incidents like this are cheating death? When really, this is a piece of piss.
Although the nosegear is used for steering, that isn't done during take-offs or landings due to its high sensitivity. This is still a high-risk landing for obvious reasons.
seen a couple with landing gear failures. If it's just a mechanical problem it is up to each airline to fix it. Most of the time the FAA (US) can only give advice on failures, but a lot of companies don't comply if it means extra cost and planes being grounded. This is also dependent on where the airplane is built and the country the crash occured. And with the 9/11 issue- the FAA does not include those incidents as 'crashes' per they were not mechanical or pilot error. It was terrorism.
thats a excellent landing for an emergency landing wiht no nose gear those pilots must be credited with special certificates after that amazing landins
JAL flight 123 was the worst airplane accident in history.
the JAPANESE pilots managed to keep the plane in flight for 32 minutes.
for a 400,000 pound glider with no control or oxygen, thats great considering it took a experenced pilot in the same situation to keep the plane in the air for 17 minutes.
man you're not well placed to say that all bombarder have problems. They just have trouble with the gears for the Q400, besides that, the rest of their fleet is perfect. Don't come out and try to throw dirt on a company like that. Every company have problems, deal with it.
The reason why there are so many bombardier aircrafts atm is because it is cheap, reliable and comfortable. Ask pilots who fly bombardier's they'll tell you they'll love it.
the reason i commend is becasue i fly those crapy airplaines and i know Cl 415 was the crapiest airplane mayde by canada and where now swiching to russian planes .. will take further consideration when there technology goes behond ww2..
lisen i know you are Canadian .. i understand .. u like bombardier airplane just like i like the sweedish girls who come to my country every year ... but the point is your tecnology is like my grammas pussy .. shes dates from ww1...so you want us to buy stuff from ww1 tecnology...no wayyyyy you keep your old pussyy .. and i get new pussy from russia DA!!!
Takes one hell of a pilot to land in a situation like that, well done!! If anyone would like to join a virtual airline that uses Dash 8s please visit my site: interskyvirtual(dot)ning(dot)com. Thanks! :)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
One this is an equipment failure after the fact. If you Notice in the beginning frames, the forward landing gear( Nose Gear) was down and locked. The landing gear collapsed. Indicative of one of two things; 1] the gear was not truly locked in place or 2] the mechanics of the landing gear failed. Pilot did not know until the plane's nose made contact and the gear failed that the plane was in trouble. Now unless the fuselage of the plane collapses, the engine props would not touch the ground.
Good thing the wings are on the roof IF it were to land on its belly
DJ727ROBLOX 1 day ago
@pacrat90 yes usually, but this was a Bombardier Q400. It has 2 turbo props and would shoot off (possibly into the cabin) if the aircraft were landed on its belly.
chasedrgc1223 2 weeks ago
I dont wanna fly in those planes now. I fly in them so many times
radioguysbrother 1 month ago
Brilliant. But isn't it safer in most aircraft to land on the belly?
pacrat90 1 month ago
that must've been scary
Jaknight66 4 months ago
made in china)))
xxx333xxx123 4 months ago
@xxx333xxx123 Made In canada.
Chris40679 4 months ago
buena reaccion la del piloto por no funciono el tren delantero de aterrizaje
26paulorenato 4 months ago
Wow, the pilots did a stunning job!
Bim0Mr 5 months ago
u would think those japs have some fucking giant robot catch the plane so it doenst lan
dennyfrontier 5 months ago
Those Q400... always missing a gear
vomarva 5 months ago
@vomarva It's because goodrich that this aircraft have a landing gear fail.
pio909 2 months ago
great landing, what sort of plane is this? i wonder why the front wheel wouldn't come down?
MYBIGKINDHEART 6 months ago
@MYBIGKINDHEART Obvious questions, firstly look at the title then stop and think of why it didn't came down. It could have been a hydraulic failure..
danoob2110 6 months ago
@MYBIGKINDHEART Its a dash 8 ( also known as crash 8) made by Bombardier in Canada. a good airplane except for the landing gear that SUCKS ! SAS (Scandinavian airlines) sold of all of their dash 8 Q400 after their costumers lost faith in them.
Sjusovare2 3 months ago
@Sjusovare2 thats the problem with anything nowadays , if they wasn't so focused on how much money they'd make instead of making a good product and in this case an airplane then things would work better but until people motivation will be chanelled in the right positive direction instead of money motavation then nothing will work properly, well thats how i see it anyway in some cases at least
MYBIGKINDHEART 3 months ago
@MYBIGKINDHEART I totally agree !
Sjusovare2 3 months ago
That's really smooth! Great job!
Tjita1 7 months ago
That was some spanktastic flying! amazing job!
DaddyMedic 7 months ago
Who needs three wheels?
Altjap1 7 months ago
Realy good job from the pilots !
Slaterator 9 months ago
I guess there's a good reason why not, but in cases where they know a nose wheel has failed before they land, why can't the airport spray a narrow strip of foam down the centreline to prevent the nose generating sparks and maybe a fire. As long as the pilot keeps the main gear either side of the foam it shouldn't affect braking.
jethou1 9 months ago
Plane grinds to a halt.
Pilot; now that was what I'd forgotten!
Eddo1998 9 months ago
i work with these planes all day everyday. they are actually very reliable.... not one plane in the world is perfect, just like a car.
chase2187 9 months ago
The plane was "Made in China"!
sinojmanXD 9 months ago
@sinojmanXD Made in Canada by Bombardier and operated by a world class Japanese airline. This model of aircraft has had several similar incidents over time, however, maintains a good safety record.
josephrib 9 months ago
Comment removed
josephrib 9 months ago
Since these Dash-8's land without the nose gear so often, they should put a couple of small wheels to either side of the front gear well doors. Or at least a skid pad
romeo9k 9 months ago
@romeo9k rofl
Immolateswe 9 months ago
NICE!Good pilot.BRAVO
TheSq380 9 months ago
This pilot is awsome!
konken9 9 months ago 10
@konken9 too bad hes asian
22hellman22 5 months ago
I think I took a photo of this plane when it left the Bombardier facilities in Toronto here!
Excellent aircraft! The gear seems to leave some room for improvement though.
Vention3 9 months ago
Oh a crash 8 400 doing what it does best.
Now I hear a Bombardier CRJ-300 has crashed in Congo killing a lot of its passengers.
My godness.
Sjusovare2 10 months ago
That was totally pilot error, he should have put down the front landing gear.
SeamusCallan1 10 months ago
@SeamusCallan1 Mechanical failure - NOT pilot error. When a pilot selects 'gear down', ALL wheels are supposed to come down at once. The pilot does not have a choice of which wheels to put down (same on all aircraft).
c53204 10 months ago
@c53204 Wow, really???? I guess you are not familiar with satire. You do realize I was joking???? Right??? Please tell me you realize I was NOT being serious. I usually do respond to people that are not smart enough to spot obvious satire........but common! Really?
SeamusCallan1 10 months ago
@SeamusCallan1 No, on the contrary. Have you read some of the idiot posts you get on here (many are mine - satire). As I don't know you and I am unable (yet) to use the internet to read peoples minds, I have to assume that your satire does not include posting on a video that potentially could have been very serious, or even fatal for some or all of the passengers (sarcasm).
c53204 10 months ago
@c53204 Well, since the title stated it was an "emergency", most semi-intelligent people would have realized that "he should have put down the front landing gear" is not a serious comment. Good luck with educating the world.
SeamusCallan1 10 months ago
That 'll buff right out
bobmatters 11 months ago 6
Anakin did this in the beginning of Revenge of the Sith.
GreedoUT 1 year ago
Bollocks!!! There go the nose gear again!!
thecessnacitation 1 year ago
Can anyone translate what the narrator said?
zidanes87 1 year ago
I bet a lot of people had to change their underwear that day
vindaloo9 1 year ago
oh im understanding everything, you know?
levygonz 1 year ago
just flew with a Q400, it is ok and much less noisy than expected. hope the maintenance guys take care of the landing gears as i will fly back on friday with the same bird:)
toci001 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I was just watching a youporn video of some hot blonde masturbating in the shower, and I totally had a massive load blow. Some went on my face, some over my face to the back of the chair. That video was way better then this one.
HelloHansSolo 1 year ago
@HelloHansSolo
cool story bro
skat0r 1 year ago
@skat0r Go get a job asshole.
HelloHansSolo 1 year ago
@HelloHansSolo
why?
skat0r 1 year ago
@skat0r To make some money so you don't suck off the Welfare system and my taxes you dipshit.
HelloHansSolo 1 year ago
@HelloHansSolo
Why aren't you making any sens? Troll more
skat0r 1 year ago
I hope EuroLOT will not buy those machines....
sirMIREK 1 year ago
I love the Dash 8 series. One of my favourite aeroplanes!
planesrule83 1 year ago
nice job great!
spongeex 1 year ago
good work!
eddogbreath 1 year ago
could have gone so much worst. Nice pilot work!
Spyplane2005 1 year ago
Wow great pilot. Very good job.
squawstar 1 year ago
Excellent pilot, nicely done.
Trigger404 1 year ago
god job
CThompson151 1 year ago
another landing gear incident with the DASH 8-Q400...That plane really is scary
Zirsquishy 1 year ago
@Zirsquishy the probleme is the gear made by Goodrich,
pio909 1 year ago
@pio909 engineering faults made by Goodrich in the landing gear, yeah, im aware.
Zirsquishy 1 year ago
@Zirsquishy Except that Bombardier engineered the gear, not Goodrich.
Goodrich built the gear to Bombardiers exacting specifications.
BrimHawk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i completely understood what the guy said....
DRAGONIRONFIST 1 year ago
i completely understood what the guy said....
DRAGONIRONFIST 1 year ago
Pilot should have cut off engines at touch down, he risked the danger of fire aboard aircraft, anyway nice job done!!!!
abrar4623 1 year ago
@abrar4623 it's actually better if the engines are running because then if it catches fire then the fire can be ingested by the engine, there's still fuel than can be ignited even if the engine is shutdown
Cactus732 1 year ago
@Cactus732 Where the hell did you come up with that?
teufelhunden1488 1 year ago
aaah people are saying :oh amazing pilot" well yes he was but if u ask me he still should have cut the engines just before touchdown as a saftey percaution i mean i know he knew it was high enough the engines wouldnt hit but still idk...
thebigrigtrucker 1 year ago
@thebigrigtrucker I Know that's Standard when doing emergency checks but maby he left them on so that he can still have i bit of directional control using the engines
Franna16 1 year ago
this is the problem of DHC8-Q400 there's many incidents happen to this type of aircraft...
Engelton182 1 year ago
only in china
DoubleDdutch 1 year ago
@DoubleDdutch Actually.. That is japan..
motti15 1 year ago 2
Pity they put the foam way too early on the strip
mistersmith6000 1 year ago
Textbook gear up landing. Well done.
SkyWolf1378 1 year ago
Kari mas dah Why Always Use That Word
MSianGenGTeam19571 1 year ago
Great pilot, bad airplane
justinjiang 1 year ago
@justinjiang Bad airplane? Maybe the maintenance was no good. I don't think Dash 8s have a history of doing this.
thehappyinsomniac 1 year ago
@thehappyinsomniac i mean to this airplane not other Dash
justinjiang 1 year ago
Silky Smooth. This is when all the simulator training pays off.
jabajabamaster 1 year ago
Great Pilots!!!
FSXSuperboy 1 year ago
no foam on the runway? emergency response FAIL
slh950 1 year ago
wow lucky that airframe is long enough to keep the props from striking the runway, or it would have been a hell of a lot messier
Keinlicht 1 year ago
Comment removed
Bondiblu2 1 year ago
@Bondiblu2
I guess the only reason you'd shut down your props would be if they were in risk of hitting the ground, so a low mounted wing with props on it would need to be shut down in order to stop the risk of additional damage from the propellers breaking off. Since this plane is a top-mounted wing, i guess there's no real problem of leaving them on.
AceOfSpades678 1 year ago
@AceOfSpades678 I've never seen a video of where the propellers separated, I could be totally wrong though. However, from what I've heard, the reason you shut down the engine is to not cause more damage to the engine.
jetfighter2011 1 year ago
@jetfighter2011 I have in my hot little hand a copy of CAA New Zealand's November/December 2009 Vector magazine. on the cover is a truly awesome photo of a Beech 1900D belly landing somewhere in New Zealand. Don't know if you can google this mag and see the pic but I can tell you that there are a s..tload of props flying off! Alloy blades just bend. Composite blades don't!!
thehappyinsomniac 1 year ago
@jetfighter2011 Just googled it and it's there. Google CAA vector magazine 2009 and you'll find the mags. Download that issue and open it with adobe reader then zoom that awesome pic. You'll have to look up high for a couple of the blades. I can count 5 blades on their way...the rest are already gone I think.
thehappyinsomniac 1 year ago
fucked up plane is fucked up! nice vid
kloneltin14 2 years ago
Dangit thats a DASH!
likinparkbigfan22 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is the same type of aircraft as the ones SAS had. They had many problems with the Q-400/800 flights from Bombardier. SAS has now sold all these aircrafts to other airline companies worldwide. Bombardier has compensated SAS with new aircrafts called CRJ and of course a lot of money.
rednavillo 2 years ago
hocka tocky HA !
Ronf465 2 years ago
VERY EASY TO SAY FORM THE COMFORT OF YOUR HOME:
"He probobaly... caused a bit less damage to the plane. "
THEY ALMOST RUN OUT OF RUNWAY THATS WHY THE WHERE FORCED TO DROP THE NOSE EARLY.THE AIRCRAFT CAME TO A COMPLETE STOP JUST AFTER THE THRESHOLD LUCKILY IN THE SAFETY ZONE OF THE PAVED RUNWAY.
The one that alerts my most is that they DIDN'T EVACUATE at least for 3 minutes.Not only that,the fire trucks with terrible aim they threw firefighting material everywhere,making the evacuation even harde
pandemis 2 years ago
OH this is not rare on a Dash!
LDP555 2 years ago
Another dash 8 with landing gear problems !! Plagued!!
huvander 2 years ago
ana A Nother Accident
crapper1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Gay
Luigi12996 2 years ago
He probobaly could have even kept the nose up longer than he did, and caused a bit less damage to the plane.
cpollo666 2 years ago
Excellent airmanship!!! look how gentley and smoothely that pilot put that nose down.
Koumrian 2 years ago 74
@Koumrian Mmmm, a bit early maybe ? Couldn't he have braked a bit longer before turning it down ?
I'm not a pilot, I don't know....just feels like that.
AtariAndre42 8 months ago
@AtariAndre42 You wouldnt want to brake too much, otherwise the nose will slam down, that pilot probably just held the nose up using aerodynamic braking by keeping the wing at a higher AOA, which will bring her down nice and gently :)
Koumrian 8 months ago
@Koumrian just stick all the way back at that point.
HolyBackboard 8 months ago
@Koumrian He crashed.
BabylonWhore666 7 months ago
Why doesn't he beta the shit out of it instead of grinding the airframe away? Something in the manual on this?
schlusselmensch 2 years ago
sorry but what do u mean beta
xxkevinxx323 2 years ago
landing without nosegear is a high risk because it is the stearing wheel on a plane
Ismalith 2 years ago
This type of landing is not particularly high risk. This aircraft does not strike the propellor blades when it lands without a nosewheel, so that danger is averted. The rudder is effective to a certain extent and the brakes can be used along with power to control direction. Why does nearly all the public and a good number of pilots think that incidents like this are cheating death? When really, this is a piece of piss.
schlusselmensch 2 years ago
Although the nosegear is used for steering, that isn't done during take-offs or landings due to its high sensitivity. This is still a high-risk landing for obvious reasons.
sugoi49 2 years ago
where is the nose gear?
Jrink30 2 years ago
Aww... they kept concentrating on the nose of the aircraft during landing, i wanted to see how much deflection the elevator has during the landing
dabambz 2 years ago
seen a couple with landing gear failures. If it's just a mechanical problem it is up to each airline to fix it. Most of the time the FAA (US) can only give advice on failures, but a lot of companies don't comply if it means extra cost and planes being grounded. This is also dependent on where the airplane is built and the country the crash occured. And with the 9/11 issue- the FAA does not include those incidents as 'crashes' per they were not mechanical or pilot error. It was terrorism.
MsSunidaze 2 years ago
6 Yays for Nose damage... =)
Chavesshu 2 years ago
chinese pilots are real shit
Alejandro9394 2 years ago
Japanese pilots got massive skills....
Malawianborn2fly 2 years ago 2
poor plane...ouch!
alluminyo 2 years ago
wtf that fire
maximorel 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Good pilot. Realy bad plane.... You get what you pay for.
Dash 8 = Crash 8
Sjusovare2 2 years ago
The Dash 8 is just as reliable as any other regional aircraft
TheBasketball5135 2 years ago
Yes 8 Landing gear failiurs in a singel year is completely normal.... It happend to.... Aaaaah... help me... To who els has it happened to ?
Sjusovare2 2 years ago
thats a excellent landing for an emergency landing wiht no nose gear those pilots must be credited with special certificates after that amazing landins
dego2121 2 years ago 3
Yeah, I guess you would call that an unconventional gear endorsement
Lageyy 2 years ago
This is such a beautiful plane.. Sad it had these huge issues with the landing gear.
niceguya1ways 2 years ago 3
A whole new meaning of "scratching the nose".
MarkusBrod 2 years ago
Seems to me not that many...
I find it suspicious that 3 of the landing gear accidents were on SAS planes.
dang2xannmtb 2 years ago
Japanese pilots have super driving skills !!!
innpressTV 2 years ago 6
do they have driving skills or flighing skills so which one?
hidri86 2 years ago
neither.....
Section9Gaming 2 years ago
JAL flight 123 was the worst airplane accident in history.
the JAPANESE pilots managed to keep the plane in flight for 32 minutes.
for a 400,000 pound glider with no control or oxygen, thats great considering it took a experenced pilot in the same situation to keep the plane in the air for 17 minutes.
so. what were your saying about japanese pilots?
RunTheRockers 2 years ago
actually the worst airplane accident was the Tenerife Disaster, when two planes collided into each others, 583 people died.
who cares if he's Japanese? he kept the plane the plane in flight for 32 minutes but everyone died, you call that skills ?
s0undActivist 2 years ago 2
sry. i was talking about the world's worst SINGLE aircraft disaster. 520 people died on 1 aircraft the Tenerife Disaster involved 2 aircrafts.
besides. not everyone died. this was the worst situation that a pilot could be in.
it was an impressive 32 minutes.
RunTheRockers 2 years ago
Comment removed
xcivcivx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
verry wrong 9/11/01 was the worst TENERIFE WAS SECOND
youngestpilotinGa 2 years ago
we're talkin accidents here, not terrorist acts
s0undActivist 2 years ago 23
if the people in the wtc and the pentagon are also counted as people who died in the actual planecrashes.. yes
if you only count the people who were in the plane tenerife was worst
masterpilot94 2 years ago
true
youngestpilotinGa 2 years ago
but i would say 9/11 was the worst. you can count the people in the buildings as casualties on the ground.
masterpilot94 2 years ago
what does that have to do with the video? stay on topic people...yes 9/11 was horrible. but thats got nothing to do with this video
SoccerBoy77 2 years ago 10
why can't we talk about plane crashes?
masterpilot94 2 years ago
Most emergency landings i have seen are because of front landing gear either not coming out or not locking... why is this keep happening ....
Darkamazon3000 3 years ago 3
wat happened 2 ur wheel
Cratz227 3 years ago
OK, I CONFESS, it's all my fault, i was on them all, i promisse i'll stop eating at Maccdonald's.
DaMatta11 3 years ago 3
It's called Bom-bar-dee-aye. I hate when people say Bombadeer.
tubeyou443 3 years ago
your way of pronounciation makes it sound like "bombadeeai"...
01134hello 3 years ago
bomb bar dee eh
tubeyou443 3 years ago
Piwot to Bom-bah-dee-waaaah
Piwot to Bom-bah-dee-waaaah
This is Elmah Fudddd
edyken77 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Do you call this landing an emergency landing?
Maarten2bf 3 years ago
um... what else would it be? an uneventful journey? a trouble free flight? a problem free flight where the nosegear failed. riiight....
blueb0g 3 years ago 5
Are you serious dude?
GinoRc 3 years ago 5
Idiot, what else should it be?
vladxxxtezi 3 years ago 2
dumb fuck
01134hello 3 years ago 3
it's still a seriously good airplane
cornskid 3 years ago 2
and ur seriously a fuckin idiot, might look good, but this plane has had soo many problems
dakin8888 3 years ago
all bombardier airplaines have probleams Greece has bought many and now r swichn g to Russian made ....They will nave do the same mistake again
pkaramb 3 years ago
man you're not well placed to say that all bombarder have problems. They just have trouble with the gears for the Q400, besides that, the rest of their fleet is perfect. Don't come out and try to throw dirt on a company like that. Every company have problems, deal with it.
The reason why there are so many bombardier aircrafts atm is because it is cheap, reliable and comfortable. Ask pilots who fly bombardier's they'll tell you they'll love it.
yragorn 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the reason i commend is becasue i fly those crapy airplaines and i know Cl 415 was the crapiest airplane mayde by canada and where now swiching to russian planes .. will take further consideration when there technology goes behond ww2..
pkaramb 3 years ago
you're one of the damn selfish kids whinning about bombardier. Shut up already, learn to fly and go fly it before you start trash talking about it.
yragorn 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
lisen i know you are Canadian .. i understand .. u like bombardier airplane just like i like the sweedish girls who come to my country every year ... but the point is your tecnology is like my grammas pussy .. shes dates from ww1...so you want us to buy stuff from ww1 tecnology...no wayyyyy you keep your old pussyy .. and i get new pussy from russia DA!!!
pkaramb 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey looser you gonna cry now baby go to your moma
pkaramb 2 years ago
dud wtf is wrong with you?
kcpod12481 2 years ago
Seems to me not that many...
I find it suspicious that 3 of the landing gear accidents were on SAS planes.
jahulian 3 years ago 2
i find it funny how none in canada ever have gear problems only in these countrys were they dont take care of them and maintain the gear
shortkid97 3 years ago
Jazz CRJ9 at Los Angeles on Dec 15th 2008, gear trouble
Jazz DH8A at Toronto on Dec 16th 2008, skidded off runway before takeoff
AirDude1213 3 years ago 2
ok first of all CRJ is not in the dash series so that dont matter and wow one okay look in norway they had like 4 in a week or somthin
shortkid97 3 years ago
haha, yeah. sorry man just being a douche :-)
avherald (dot) com
They have everything.
AirDude1213 3 years ago
yeah, but maybe the design engineers should have taken that into account like boeing does
cornskid 3 years ago
wow, i wonder if the plane was even affected aside from afew scratches.
Imprezaman555 3 years ago
Howcome this happens to a lot of q400's?
dreamofthemirrors 3 years ago
metal weakness in the bolts on the landing gears
o0robert0oDK 3 years ago
Yes, Made in China :P
energyrocket 3 years ago
THis is why we get a billion hours of training. For situations like this.
flyguy281 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Takes one hell of a pilot to land in a situation like that, well done!! If anyone would like to join a virtual airline that uses Dash 8s please visit my site: interskyvirtual(dot)ning(dot)com. Thanks! :)
myadder2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
One this is an equipment failure after the fact. If you Notice in the beginning frames, the forward landing gear( Nose Gear) was down and locked. The landing gear collapsed. Indicative of one of two things; 1] the gear was not truly locked in place or 2] the mechanics of the landing gear failed. Pilot did not know until the plane's nose made contact and the gear failed that the plane was in trouble. Now unless the fuselage of the plane collapses, the engine props would not touch the ground.
DocAnaheim 3 years ago