Stock RSX Type S 2004

[Majdaqel1993]

what isnt faster than a stock v6 mustang. please dont act like thats a good thing, i raced my friends v6 mustang in my bmw 530 and i couldnt even see his ass next to me. had to look in the mirror.

[555legit]

@BJB262 lol if you say so...what car do you own?

[555legit]

@BJB262 lol if you say so...what car do you own?

[BJB262]

Is the rsx a girly car?

[555legit]

@ivajlkvd. I wont be able to do that on that RSX, I'm no longer owning that car, I had to sell it a few years ago ( have a kid now), now Mdx and tsx owner

[ivajlkvd]

Launch around 4500 for a pretty good 0-60 time bro.

[k3vinyAng]

Sad how rsx dont slick third gear like civic si. But they both equal hp

[555legit]

@k3vinyAng I think civic SI are slightly faster due to the fact they have more HP tothe wheel. I cant swear about this but its what i've heard.

[knecht05]

rsx type s. run 0-60 in 6.5 seconds , look it up fuck

[Mickyto09]

very nice!

[titleist916k]

Some idiot posted that a tc is faster than a tpe s...lol! i called him out. if you do a couple things to the rsx i have dc headers and injen cold air. i run 0-60 in 5.5 to 5.8..

[22770259]

how many miles does your RSX type S have. I was looking about getting one with 142,000 miles they said a women drove it to work for awhile. But if i get it i would like to get an intake header k-pro and cai.

should i gets this one???

[TheLoveBrothers]

this is kinda late. maybe you got it or maybe not but 142k is a lot of miles, but if its not abused and its in good shape it should be fine. Its honda and they make great cars. It'll last a long time if you take care of it. You can probably get a good price on one with those miles

[555legit]

That RSX had like 40k miles.

I'd look for something more like under 100k miles. But this is only me

[TheLoveBrothers]

Wow, that was fast. I got 0-60 in 6 seconds too. I dunno how that other guy got 7 and 8 seconds, he's way off. And the RSX Type S is made for the track. Its not like its bad in a straight line, its really good, especially for a FWD car, but on a track its even better. That's what it was designed for. Mine has intake, exhaust and rims and other small stuff. Its really fast and handles great. Love my car.

[AzNJohn25]

THAT RSX TYPE S DOES IT IN 6 SECONDS, i timed it, i get 5.9, 6.0, 6.1. and 6.2

i own a rsx type s 05 A SPEC PACKAGE, BLACK, and its fast as fuck, took out alot of cars already, and mines all stock, people dont realized, the rsx i know its what only 210 horsepower and no torque, but its light as fuck!

[rikiaryi]

nice launch, seems stock to me =D

[k20tsab]

man this dont seem stock but nice

[megarakidd]

sorry but that aint stock

[555legit]

100% stock, look at some not stock RSX vids, you will see how mine is slow

[lilRSXs]

haha.. agree.. it's pretty nice though.. even though it's stock.. i'm loving mine 03 stock as the way it is..

[xacefacex]

man yours really isn't slow..try revving it up to about 5100 rpms then let off the clutch in first gear..you'll get a faster 0-40 time, but i wouldn't let it off too quick.otherwise your just gunna spin. you probably know this already..haha

[555legit]

It was 100% stock. Anyway I do not own a RSX no more. But god I loved it.

I am getting old and with the kids so...now driving a stock MDX =D

[kamikazefighta]

i own an 04 type-s and this video is legit stock.

[555legit]

As soon as the god damn snow is gone ill post a new vids whit my RSX-S after the problem i had is finaly fixed...i was a bit slow cause my valve timing wa not right and half of them were not having the good torque...which was causing a compression loss...and also my head have been planished, now having a bit more compression

[98MustangTuning]

wow a stock V6 mustang would kill your car...thats realy not saying a whole lot for your type s... k20 is a joke bitch

[555legit]

What do you mean by killing my car ? The mustang will beat my car ? Will it hurt ?

Oh also, K20 is not a joke, it is a motor as far as i know =D

I do not expect a lil 2.0 L motor to be the fastest, i just love my car thats all. BTW i know mustang kick ass, my friend have one which is supercharged, that car is crazy, wheels are still spinning in 3rd gear.

[PeAkBoOsTeR]

lol wtf r u smoking? a v6 mustang will get killed by an rsx-s! the rsx even gives a good run 2 a v8 mustang! learn ur shit.

[heysexy18]

Your really funny!

Seriously you sound gealous Mustang V6 owner.

This car is faster stock for stock againts a Mustang V6.

[speed1205]

@heysexy18 I think so but not the new ones. New V6's come with stock 300 hp i Believe... (I fucking hate fords though lol)

[heysexy18]

@speed1205 Yeah the new 2011's are fast. I love any car that's fast, Honda's, Fords, Chevy's, Toyotas though ehh lol. Only the Supra.

[speed1205]

@heysexy18 I drive a Nissan.

[heysexy18]

@speed1205 Oh I love Nissans. They probably make the best sounding and just best V6's of any automaker.

[krazokevin]

My 94 del slow beat a 98 v6 and my car is stock, thats saying something haha

[isntthisacrapysn]

w8... this was the most funny excuse i've ever heard....

your valve timing was not right? and half of them were not having the good torque? which was causing a compression loss!??! and your head was PLANISHED and now has more compression!??!?!?!

1. you either had really good tires, or you were not on snow. fwd would've burnt out the way you drove it.

2. fwd would've done that anyway.

i loled at this hahahahahaha

0-60 in 8 > seconds (less than 8 seconds)

typical FWD 4 cylinder car..

[555legit]

The vlave really had problem with torque, this motor was rebuild due to a miss shift, I AM NOT on snow on that video,you'd have to be stupid like heck to think i am , i was tellin that i will repost a video as soon as summer is coming, which is now fine, its summer now. My tire are not really good but they are not crap either, i have some RE760. The car is doing better now and WTF, i know my car is not the bomb geez, never told it was the fastest car, and its also fu ckin stock

[isntthisacrapysn]

whoa whoa calm down there haha

but if you post car stuff on youtube people have a minimum standard on these things, so ratinsg will be low

why a video ratings be low? because the vid doesn't meet these standards. we assume that the people uploading the video thought that the video met the standards of adequate rating, which is why (in a way) we viewers automatically think that the creator thought highly of his video.

just my input to why i assumed some things.

[555legit]

Hi again =), i am calm, i just posted that shitty vids for fun, and BTW it is listed as STOCK RSX S vid, so it is giving an idea of the kind of performance a stock RSX S can do, anyway, my car is the slowest on its category and price range and i dont give a ****, i 100 times better drive it then driving a SRT-4 or a supercharged crappy cobalt, but hey, just my opinion.

Onyl thing i hate about my car if the fact i need to start at 20MPH if i want a good start.

Amen

[ojd1990]

where'd you get 8 seconds??? that was 6-7

[isntthisacrapysn]

I said > 8. (even put the explanation in a paranthesis right next to it for people who didn't pass fundamental math)

I guess the timer threw me off when it read from 00:02.XX ~ 00:10.XX seconds.

Where'd you get 6? And even still, 7 seconds isn't great...

[ojd1990]

started at 3 hit 60 mph through 9. That's not bad for a car not made for straight line performance.

[isntthisacrapysn]

No, dude ; get a watch and time it. It's 7 seconds.

Well it's not impressive in the world of cars. And performance. Sure you could be the champion of the handicapped marathon, but you're still pretty slow.

This car was marketed as a sports car though hmm....

Anyways this car is a FWD so I don't know where you got the "not made for straight line performance" idea.

It certainly isn't made for the track. If made for anything, it's made for the straight line - because it simply can't track rofl

[ojd1990]

they don't make FWD i4 cars with high rpm turning and low toque for straight line use. FWD shows it's strengths in the autoross. This is really a car that's made to be affordable and fun to drive and talking shit on someone elses car is as low as you go.

[isntthisacrapysn]

Um... okay dude most 4 cylinder cars can exceed 8,000 RPM now (240sx. Hyunda Sonata <-- rofl even that can).

Torque? We're talking about 4 cylinder cars here - all 4 cylinder cars have VERY low torque.

FWD shows its strengths in the autocross?

*... no comment rofl*

This isn't really a car that's made to be affordable (but it's supposed to be fun to drive cause you get that FWD pull feeling that you're going fast). Talking shit about someone's car is low - only if it isn't true. Rofl.

[isntthisacrapysn]

$27,000 MSRP for a car like this - might as well save up a little more and get an Evo or something - a medium rally car SEDAN rofl.

What you pay for is a mediocre sports car. I'm only speaking from personal experience.

What I don't get about Honda fans is after all this is said - they'll probably try to defend themselves with "Hondas got reliability (not really - just parts easy to find rofl) and "great" MPG (not really) and then "VTEC" (same as MIVEC,VVt-i, VVL).

So don't start. Lol.

[ojd1990]

I never said I was a Honda fan. I don't even really like them all that much. I drive a Ford. I just hate when people rip on other peoples car. That is the lowest class you can be

[isntthisacrapysn]

Alright well hey just precautions.

For me, it's not "talking shit" if the car itself isn't that fast in the first place. I wasn't really 'talking shit' in the first place. I was stating truths about the vid; the car went 0-60 in under 8 seconds ( a little over 7 seconds to be more

exact).

If that's what you think - that's fine, but it's way worse to pretend your car is fast and tell everyone it is (when it really isn't that great).

It's like lying about a huge dick. Pointless at the end.

[ojd1990]

just because a car isn't fast doesn't mean it sucks. This guy also never said his car was fast

[oc0dyc]

Just FYI, ">" means greater than so your comment about not passing fundamental math is laughable.

[isntthisacrapysn]

Your point?

Of course ">" means greater than.

Looks > performance.

That means that the value of "looks" is greater than "performance". I guess we just transitioned into somebody who doesn't know how to interpret basic literature.

Oh well, problem solved for you bud.

[oc0dyc]

The following were both said by YOU. Please re-read and tell me which one of us is having a problem understanding: "I said > 8. (even put the explanation in a paranthesis right next to it for people who didn't pass fundamental math)"

"No, dude ; get a watch and time it. It's 7 seconds."

So yes, apparently I DO need a simpler explanation because I can't for the life of me figure out how 7 > 8 . Maybe you know something my calc teacher doesn't.I agree that looks are important. Both are

[isntthisacrapysn]

O that's the wrong comment.

And you're still wrong.

"

i loled at this hahahahahaha

0-60 in 8 > seconds (less than 8 seconds)

typical FWD 4 cylinder car.. "

That's what I said. You blind bro :x?

[isntthisacrapysn]

And if you didn't get that comment I said before, I advise you to look back to where I was referring to the mentality of "ricers" (who spend more on looks > performance).

Oij OIJ OIJ OIJ OIJ. lolol. did you understand it mr. or do you need a simpler explanation?

[isntthisacrapysn]

o now I see where I fucked up lol.

Yea, to follow up for my "

i loled at this hahahahahaha

0-60 in 8 > seconds (less than 8 seconds)

typical FWD 4 cylinder car.. " comment, I switched "8" and ">". My mistake. If you saw the comment before you'd have understood.

[krazyxc12ip]

hey 555legit i made my rsx hit 8,200 stock 2

[555legit]

8,100 for a 05-06...cant be on a 04 and older...If yes i want a vids of that

[swtendo]

just wondering are the stock rsx type s as loud as an 06-07 stock si? cause when the si hits vtec its loud but im wonderin if this is as loud stock vs stock thnx

[tereret]

dude i dont wana give u a migrane,but yah ill make a vedeo on it and post it by friday.alright.

[555legit]

still waiting on your vid =D

[tereret]

its type s.i have an 04 type s too,it goes up to 120 mph on 4th gear at 8200 rpm.

[555legit]

8,200 rpm? Are you using K-Pro or a hondata reflash?

[tereret]

you might not believe it,but its all stock man,i think 04 type s has a different gear than 05 and 06.

[555legit]

No, i mean a 04 is what im using and the rev cut off is at 7.900rpm...and the cut off is at 8.100 for 05-06, how can you get yours to 8,200 whitout reflash or K-Pro???

[tereret]

dude honestly i really dont know,my friend own a 04 type s too and he wondered,i even let him drive my car as a proof dat im not bullshiting him.

[555legit]

This is weird really...can you post a video of it? Not that i do not believe what you are telling me but im really curious about it

[marlo916]

my 06 base auto does 120 at about 6k rpm in 4th. bone stock. (takes eternity to get that fast tho..haha)

[dafunkamania]

i have a type S and that seems about right

[artinnem]

its a type-s 4sure. Dont u see it on the Rpm? It has 8000 of em.

[tallica777]

Thats not a type s is it? it looks kinda slow like maybe the stock 160 model. hmmmm

[555legit]

It is a type S, i was on a little slope that slowed me down. 0-60mph took around 7 sec...