AT LEAST THIS TIME THEY WERE JUST BURNING IMAGES SINCE IN MEDIEVAL TIMES THEY USED TO BURN PEOPLE AND GALILEO WAS ABOUT TO BECOME ONE OF THEIR VICTIMS...thanks God it didn't happened ! ...hahaha (it's a joke!).
John loves Mary written in sand on the beach is evidence for design because it is something we can recognize as a product of human design. Life forms, stars, and planets though are not.
Yeah! Right-wing Christard Funny-mentalist just love to burn stuff. If I had been the student who painted the mural depicting the evolution of man, I would have told them to please, do not burn my painting and let me to take it down myself to take it home with me for safe keeping until the local controversy was settled, and hopefully, I may be able to put it back up again on public display. But no! The student wasn't even allowed that chance. They just took it and burned it. Ecclesiass-holes!
I feel ashamed that the university I'm at (Warwick) could have ever employed someone as stupid as Steve Fuller. Wtf is he doing on this programme anyway? He taught sociology.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I guess when the world does end, these people who believes in evolution will base that on natural causes too. Well, that will NOT be the case. The Creator said "they will have to know I am JEHOVAH. (Ezekiel 38:23). Every human on this planet will be in agreement on that day just before the life force is taken from them. Only 1 human in 1176 will survive it and not much folks from Wall Street will be counted as worthy. Thank God for that.
"... and thats when i introduced him to the theory of intelligent design..." *sigh*
Yet another ignorant as to what a scientific theory is.
One thing is certain, I.D. does not fit the bill of a theory.
You would think a lawyer should be educated enough to know the difference. Unless ofc, he has a different agenda - I bet you he makes more than 100$ a week representing other religious fanatics
Did Mormon begat moron as 'christian' begat 'cretin' i wonder ? Please advise me if you know, its been bothering me for a while now.. i dont want to call a creationist a moron when he/she is in fact a cretin, if youknowarrimean
Watch "The Secret Life Of Choas" its on Youtube somewhere and presents mathematical evidence for infinitly complex systems deriving from similar or simple sources (i.e. no need for designer, better luck on your next repackaging). Seriously its good
"because it's called science" is a much much much bigger statement than he thinks he just made. Also evolution is kind of backbone for all biology and zoology etc. It explains the similartiy and relationship between all kinds of life. Without it I suppose you'd have to throw away a lot of biology in general. So you can forget about advances in medicine and improvements in your standards of life
It really isn't any wonder why so many people hate the idea of Evolution when a kid can't even paint a picture of it in a Friggin' Art Class without some Creationist being offended!
Can you imagine what would happen if a student painted a picture of a scene from the Bible, and an Atheist Teacher stole it burnt it! Creationists would probably have tried to burn the Atheist for it!
im sorry if you believe intelligent design is a SCIENTIFIC THEORY you're just plan stupid it cannot be TESTED, which is one of the basic principles of science
It is interesting that a false dichotomy of 'Religion vs. Science' sometimes develops whenever religious claims are confronted (and demolished) by objective inquiry. The vast majority of well-educated Christians (and other religions) already do accept evolution. And a person being an "Evolutionist" is like being a "Heliocentrist".
The defeat of religiously-motivated rubbish such as Creationism or 'Intelligent Design' is a victory for rationality and secularism, not atheism specifically.
The true dichotomy is 'Religion vs. Religion,' one in which Evolution is one religion, and Creationism is another. Science can be used to validate or disprove either perspective.
The point is the words Evolution and Science are NOT interchangeable.
@colec001 "I don't see this happening with Evolution theory"
Then you're not looking in the right places. Evolution isn't sweeping evidence under the carpet. Things that are hoaxes or mistaken for something else are discovered & fixed under peer review.
If your mind is made up about Evolution being wrong then it's too late. But if you want some facts then watch these:
Did you pray for the computer to miraculously appear?
Or modern heart surgery?
Science has shown time and time again that it is to be taken seriously because it has yielded amazing results that have benefitted us all.
It is not a religion because it is based on evidence - and has hence delivered the goods.
Religion has provided nothing except willful ignorance (I name you exhibit A) and wars and self-important idiocy with "faith" (zero thought) as a virtue.
I see that you, too, are under the impression that science is on trial here. It is not. Take a breath, clear your head, and repeat after me: "Science and Evolution are different words."
The Evolution Method is a logical and rational order of steps by which evolutionists come to conclusions about the world around them. The evolution Method helps to organize thoughts and procedures so that evolutionists can be confident in the answers they find. Evolutionists use observations, hypotheses, and deductions to make these conclusions, just like you will use the Evolution Method in your Evolution fair project.
I was telling you galileo RINGS YOU a bell? Obviusly galileo could not have been a christian because he believed the sun was at the center of the solar sistem rather than the earth? The catholic church already experimented with galileo what you guys are experiencing with darwin. Need i remind you of your many failures in court? Evolution is science, it makes testable predictions which have been verified, thats the very essence of the scientific method. (later on vid 6 miller does show this)
@colec001 "It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."
@colec001 -- "I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms."
judging by your other comment you don't know anything about the subject and insist on arguing without a firm foundation. even typing the word evolutionist tells me you're a scientific illiterate
Do yor own homeworks, else keep your mouth shout. If you had a bit of a smarter mind you would realize that other countries don't study history the way you americans study it. For example in italy the average person knows about 2 of the 50 or so presidents of america while you probably can tell us all their names on memory, on the other hand we can tell you about our artists/scientists lives easily. It doesn't take much to realize each country studies its own history...
BTW do they teach about galileo's history in biology classes there where you live? If so i understand why you guys never understand biology, you take history classes in biology classes XD
Colec ever heard of project steve? If not all scientists then the percentage is easily above the 95% and in biology its easy that the percentage is above 99%, there are only quarreals about how what is the main force driving evolution if it is mainly believed to be natural selection tough other factors might be relevant
About galileo, i live in his country, in high school i studied his life instead of studying who the hell was abram lincholn, i don't go claim stuff about him like you do ;)
I heard of his persecution in history class :P as well of his life, his inventions, the good deeds of the church of that time, the story of copernicus. Living in italy means being up to date with church's view on that for example Ratzinger before becoming pope was driven out by one of our universities (la sapienza) because he went there to apologize for misdoings of the church to galileo instead his speech contained diffamatory quotes. So much for being humble?
Lyell was a lawyer, too. Darwin was reading his book on the Beagle. Lyell's layers and fossils and ages are still in use today. Lyell was an atheist. Darwin's formal training was in theology.
wow. This series is just blowing me away. I actually thought it was around 10% of people who thought ID was a science, not the numbers mentioned here.
@diomedes39 Eugenics doesn't work because nobody knows what will constitute 'fitness' in an unpredictable world. The gene that predisposes towards scycle cell anemia also protects against malaria. Do you want it in or out? Nazi eugenics would have produced blond, blue eyed Herrenvolk who would all have been dead from melanoma cancer in this world of thinning ozone protection.
@gamesbok All that Eugenics means is to purposefully manipulate genes in a population through selective breeding. The Nazi's did try to use Eugenics to make supermen but that speaks nothing about the effectiveness of the theory. Besides, not all of us pale people have melanoma haha.
@diomedes39 Germans are tall and blond and blue-eyed, but not as tall and blond and blue-eyed as they think they are, especially when they are short, dark Austrians with a sense of destiny.
Eugenics has proven successful in giving us livestock, but anyone who has payed the vets bills for a thoroughbred might look at hybred vigour with envy. Attempting to narrow the gene pool is fraught with hazard.
Show me. Darwin found finches. whole varieties of finches. he thought they were evolved, but the birders back in merry old England said they were all finches.
Instead of writing "Adaptations,"
Darwin wrote "Origins"
-Just who is bending the facts to their will, here?
Antony Flew, the ultimate atheist and champion debater, succumbed to this evidence and has since left his dereistic atheistic beliefs. More will follow!!!!
C.O.M.P.L.E.X.I.T.Y. = "Superintelligent Programmer Engineered Cell's Information Found In DNA. Cell's Operational Messaging Provides Library Entailing 'Xeroxed' Information Teleologically Yielded"
*please look up "Teleology".
I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.T.
D.E.S.I.G.N. = "I'm Now Typing Each Letter Like Intelligent Guidance Encoded Nature Too! DNA's Encoding Shows Intelligent Guidance Needed."
S.C.I.E.N.C.E. ="Specified Complexity Is Evidence Now Creator Exists!"
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
W.I.L.L.I.A.M. A. D.E.M.B.S.K.I. = "Working Intelligence Logically Left Irreducible, Amazing Molecular Assemblages. Designed Engines Must Be Showing Knowledgeable Inventor!"
The biggest problem for Creationists is which creation story would be adopted; Baha'i, Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Animism, Jainism, Zoroastrianism, Scientology, Cai Dai, etc
What the ID proponents are really saying is that they want THEIR version peddled over all other faith-based versions, the irony being most Christians don't even accept that version.
On the other hand, there is only one evolution story based on the data.
The evolution story began with finches. Finches. Not turkeys descended from Finches. The story was laid out first, then data was assimilated to support the model. -Did you know Dino DNA must be related to chicken DNA, else it is discarded? Why? PREDUDICE.
I had a person pushing that "intelligent agent" line to me once. When I asked if it was possible that the intelligent agent could be an alien species rather than a supernatural being, they said no. When I asked why not, they couldn't give me an answer and instead started quoting scripture. The spychology at work here is really startling.
The thing that gets me most about "not believing" in evolution is this:
Once you understand the history, you have to be aware that human beings were not the first, nor will we be the last dominant species on our planet. The sun's got a good 13-billion years or so left in her.
Why deny yourself the true riddles of the universe?
Some of these i.d. guys must have some serious poker faces to be able to say what they do and not break down laughing. Guess Bill Maher is right, if you don't add 'lol' to your statement it must be true.
AT LEAST THIS TIME THEY WERE JUST BURNING IMAGES SINCE IN MEDIEVAL TIMES THEY USED TO BURN PEOPLE AND GALILEO WAS ABOUT TO BECOME ONE OF THEIR VICTIMS...thanks God it didn't happened ! ...hahaha (it's a joke!).
jorgecalivalle 4 months ago
John loves Mary written in sand on the beach is evidence for design because it is something we can recognize as a product of human design. Life forms, stars, and planets though are not.
jeremythehuman 7 months ago in playlist Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial
The painting of the ape-to man was voted to be taken down, not "vandalised"
RekindledRebelfire 7 months ago
@RekindledRebelfire I'd call burning it a sign of vandalism.
Darkstar1484 5 months ago in playlist Skepticism and Freethought
If 'John Loves Mary' was written by a creationists then there's proof intelligence wasn't required!!
maskofsan1ty 8 months ago
Yeah! Right-wing Christard Funny-mentalist just love to burn stuff. If I had been the student who painted the mural depicting the evolution of man, I would have told them to please, do not burn my painting and let me to take it down myself to take it home with me for safe keeping until the local controversy was settled, and hopefully, I may be able to put it back up again on public display. But no! The student wasn't even allowed that chance. They just took it and burned it. Ecclesiass-holes!
BigFatHeretic 8 months ago
268 people are scientific geniuses.
HiryuGouki 10 months ago
@HiryuGouki Doesn't require a genius to tell - abeit with all the information available nowadays - that intelligent design is rubbish.
vk45de 8 months ago
139 people are Creationist Twits.
HiryuGouki 10 months ago
I feel ashamed that the university I'm at (Warwick) could have ever employed someone as stupid as Steve Fuller. Wtf is he doing on this programme anyway? He taught sociology.
ragerancher 10 months ago
So they're so busy burning paintings that are offensive and go against all they were told...
Well, we might as well burn The Adoration of the Magi by Sandro Botticelli because it features Jesus' birth.
Of course, I'm exaggerating. But that was some kids painting. You don't do that.
pythor2 10 months ago
'John loves Ma-...' Of for the love of...they're not even TRYING to hide it!
KrimzonFlygon 11 months ago
"A think-tank called the Discovery Institute" - so many errors in such a short sentence.
Experiment47 1 year ago
I evolved from Peter Griffin's chin!
crazypdj 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Christians are so stupid!
shade421 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I guess when the world does end, these people who believes in evolution will base that on natural causes too. Well, that will NOT be the case. The Creator said "they will have to know I am JEHOVAH. (Ezekiel 38:23). Every human on this planet will be in agreement on that day just before the life force is taken from them. Only 1 human in 1176 will survive it and not much folks from Wall Street will be counted as worthy. Thank God for that.
anthonysibble 1 year ago
only in America...
Orical001 1 year ago 3
"... and thats when i introduced him to the theory of intelligent design..." *sigh*
Yet another ignorant as to what a scientific theory is.
One thing is certain, I.D. does not fit the bill of a theory.
You would think a lawyer should be educated enough to know the difference. Unless ofc, he has a different agenda - I bet you he makes more than 100$ a week representing other religious fanatics
tdjdk 1 year ago
In general, theories are falsifiable.
There's nothing falsifiable of ID.
leduck1000 1 year ago
@tdjdk Whether or not he knows, he's also preening for the cameras. He's part of a culture of people that want to christianize the country.
Darkstar1484 10 months ago
the Salem witch trials all over again. religion is has brainwashed you people. open your eyes there is NO god.
satibablaze 1 year ago
Too bad Phillip Johnson is a law professor and not a qualified biologist, otherwise his opinions might actually amount to something.
cadman2300 1 year ago
The integration of Natural Selection and Intelligent Design is studied in Buddhism.
/watch?v=KfDq8weDLAY
fonsidream 1 year ago
Did Mormon begat moron as 'christian' begat 'cretin' i wonder ? Please advise me if you know, its been bothering me for a while now.. i dont want to call a creationist a moron when he/she is in fact a cretin, if youknowarrimean
HYDROPODSBOD 2 years ago
Watch "The Secret Life Of Choas" its on Youtube somewhere and presents mathematical evidence for infinitly complex systems deriving from similar or simple sources (i.e. no need for designer, better luck on your next repackaging). Seriously its good
j3parrots 2 years ago
Anyone who could burn a kid's artwork is one sick sack of crap.
CanadiaNecro1 2 years ago 8
"because it's called science" is a much much much bigger statement than he thinks he just made. Also evolution is kind of backbone for all biology and zoology etc. It explains the similartiy and relationship between all kinds of life. Without it I suppose you'd have to throw away a lot of biology in general. So you can forget about advances in medicine and improvements in your standards of life
collapseofthedollar 2 years ago 2
@collapseofthedollar
I see. If I refuse chickens descended from velociraptors, I must forgo velcro.
Absolutely brilliant.
Tell me, how many patenets do you hold?
colec001 1 year ago
Christians are good at burning things.
mikesinner69 2 years ago 18
And people. :/
deadman12078 2 years ago 2
@mikesinner69 Indeed they are. They're also good at pissing off innocent Muslim communities by burning their holy book, too!
HiryuGouki 10 months ago
It really isn't any wonder why so many people hate the idea of Evolution when a kid can't even paint a picture of it in a Friggin' Art Class without some Creationist being offended!
Can you imagine what would happen if a student painted a picture of a scene from the Bible, and an Atheist Teacher stole it burnt it! Creationists would probably have tried to burn the Atheist for it!
Bowmaj21 2 years ago 3
sho nuff
spideylover 2 years ago
lol its funny looking at creationists flaming and arguing because they got their but kicked and handed back to them in court.
kyagh 2 years ago
im sorry if you believe intelligent design is a SCIENTIFIC THEORY you're just plan stupid it cannot be TESTED, which is one of the basic principles of science
kenuffff 2 years ago 4
You dumbass. You complete dumbass. I would need time on the Hubble to see the furthest reaches of your dumbassed-ness.
Test millions of years. Repeat it. have a peer review on it.
Dumbass.
colec001 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why is it when Evolutionists start congratulating each other, a big shout out to "Yay, Atheism!" goes out with it?
-I thought Evolution was not a Relegion?!?
Obviously, Newton and Einstein cannot be scientists, because they believed in God.
colec001 2 years ago
It is interesting that a false dichotomy of 'Religion vs. Science' sometimes develops whenever religious claims are confronted (and demolished) by objective inquiry. The vast majority of well-educated Christians (and other religions) already do accept evolution. And a person being an "Evolutionist" is like being a "Heliocentrist".
The defeat of religiously-motivated rubbish such as Creationism or 'Intelligent Design' is a victory for rationality and secularism, not atheism specifically.
AnonymousDiv0 2 years ago
A chemist is a chemist. Chemistry does not dictate or otherwise prove millions of years.
Again, my point is science is science, and wild fantasy is wild fantasy. Evolution is wild fantasy, so much so that the storyline keeps changing...
colec001 2 years ago
That is a false dichotomy, I agree.
The true dichotomy is 'Religion vs. Religion,' one in which Evolution is one religion, and Creationism is another. Science can be used to validate or disprove either perspective.
The point is the words Evolution and Science are NOT interchangeable.
colec001 2 years ago
"The point is the words Evolution and Science are NOT interchangeable."
Science has validated the theory of evolution at every turn. You're either a troll or a retard.
Go watch shanedk's video series "How Evolution Is Scientific".
I have no more time to waste on the blind or the wilfully ignorant.
AnonymousDiv0 2 years ago
I thought Science required observation, repeatable experiments with consistent results, even discarding some hypothesis because of observed results.
I don't see this happening with Evolution theory.
Piltdown Man is a boar's tooth.
Every ancient dead monkey is the missing link.
"Every fetus looks the same" is a hoax.
Carbon dating methods from the 1950's is assumption built on assumption, and still in use. Evolution has grasped science as a tool.
Science is just fine without evolution.
colec001 2 years ago
Piltdown man didnt fool anybody except the french media, because the drawing did not represent the scientific consensus.
There are many missing links, the fossil record isn't perfect, but it does show a perfect transition, regardless of how many small holes there are.
Embryology is actually very well founded, and modern pictures are quite insightful, you should check them out.
Carbon dating is used because it DOES work, and of course it's based on assumptions, EVERYTHING IS.
Timmay123456789 2 years ago 4
@colec001 "I don't see this happening with Evolution theory"
Then you're not looking in the right places. Evolution isn't sweeping evidence under the carpet. Things that are hoaxes or mistaken for something else are discovered & fixed under peer review.
If your mind is made up about Evolution being wrong then it's too late. But if you want some facts then watch these:
/watch?v=5nj587d5ies&feature=email
/watch?v=i1fGkFuHIu0&feature=related
/watch?v=-CvX_mD5weM&feature=rec-HM-fresh+div
warren52nz 2 years ago
absolute rubbish.
Did you pray for the computer to miraculously appear?
Or modern heart surgery?
Science has shown time and time again that it is to be taken seriously because it has yielded amazing results that have benefitted us all.
It is not a religion because it is based on evidence - and has hence delivered the goods.
Religion has provided nothing except willful ignorance (I name you exhibit A) and wars and self-important idiocy with "faith" (zero thought) as a virtue.
jazzx251 2 years ago
I see that you, too, are under the impression that science is on trial here. It is not. Take a breath, clear your head, and repeat after me: "Science and Evolution are different words."
colec001 2 years ago
Evolution is science - one of the most supported Theories. More so than electricity and gravity.
The Theory that the world is round is less supported than evolution.
jazzx251 2 years ago
While your passion is apparent, your logic fails.
colec001 2 years ago
My Day at the Evolution Fair
Buoyancy related evolution projects are fun. They are based on the evolution of displacement, densities, and other evolution principles.
***
colec001 2 years ago
The Evolution Method
The Evolution Method is a logical and rational order of steps by which evolutionists come to conclusions about the world around them. The evolution Method helps to organize thoughts and procedures so that evolutionists can be confident in the answers they find. Evolutionists use observations, hypotheses, and deductions to make these conclusions, just like you will use the Evolution Method in your Evolution fair project.
colec001 2 years ago
Bigot
colec001 2 years ago
Galileo rings a bell?
kyagh 2 years ago
No, that was Pavlov.
colec001 2 years ago
I was telling you galileo RINGS YOU a bell? Obviusly galileo could not have been a christian because he believed the sun was at the center of the solar sistem rather than the earth? The catholic church already experimented with galileo what you guys are experiencing with darwin. Need i remind you of your many failures in court? Evolution is science, it makes testable predictions which have been verified, thats the very essence of the scientific method. (later on vid 6 miller does show this)
kyagh 2 years ago
Galileo was "a genuinely pious Roman Catholic."
I know, weird, huh?
Perhaps you are in a fantasy world, too?
colec001 2 years ago
colec...I'm shocked... I'm truly shocked... do you really NOT KNOW what happened to galileo?
Ahh if it was true that ignorance is bliss then you guys indeed are happy but not because of god XD
kyagh 2 years ago
You know one fact about Galileo.
That is it?
How's that ignorance working out for ya'?
-Happy?
colec001 2 years ago
@colec001 "It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."
-Albert Einstein
gamesbok 1 year ago
@gamesbok
Einstein:
"I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details."
"I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice."
"God is subtle but he is not malicious."
"Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind."
colec001 1 year ago
@colec001 -- "I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms."
- Albert Einstein
gamesbok 1 year ago
ah so the founders of the "science" of id were lawyers..... fantastic
diomedes39 2 years ago
And what was Lyell?
colec001 2 years ago
judging by your other comment you don't know anything about the subject and insist on arguing without a firm foundation. even typing the word evolutionist tells me you're a scientific illiterate
diomedes39 2 years ago
You assume all scientists endorse Evolution.
This is not the case.
Hence the distinction.
Thanks for the insults.
colec001 2 years ago
How many scientists do not accept evolutionary theory? What were or are their respective fields?
diomedes39 2 years ago
Do you own homework, else keep your mind shut.
colec001 2 years ago
I was actually trying to get you to do yours.
diomedes39 2 years ago
Do yor own homeworks, else keep your mouth shout. If you had a bit of a smarter mind you would realize that other countries don't study history the way you americans study it. For example in italy the average person knows about 2 of the 50 or so presidents of america while you probably can tell us all their names on memory, on the other hand we can tell you about our artists/scientists lives easily. It doesn't take much to realize each country studies its own history...
kyagh 2 years ago
BTW do they teach about galileo's history in biology classes there where you live? If so i understand why you guys never understand biology, you take history classes in biology classes XD
kyagh 2 years ago
Colec ever heard of project steve? If not all scientists then the percentage is easily above the 95% and in biology its easy that the percentage is above 99%, there are only quarreals about how what is the main force driving evolution if it is mainly believed to be natural selection tough other factors might be relevant
About galileo, i live in his country, in high school i studied his life instead of studying who the hell was abram lincholn, i don't go claim stuff about him like you do ;)
kyagh 2 years ago
You might live in his country, but that doesn't make you two "tight." You could live in a garage, but that wouldn't make you a PEUGEOT engineer.
I think you heard of his persecution in biology class, not of his life in history class.
colec001 2 years ago
I heard of his persecution in history class :P as well of his life, his inventions, the good deeds of the church of that time, the story of copernicus. Living in italy means being up to date with church's view on that for example Ratzinger before becoming pope was driven out by one of our universities (la sapienza) because he went there to apologize for misdoings of the church to galileo instead his speech contained diffamatory quotes. So much for being humble?
kyagh 2 years ago
Lyell was a lawyer, too. Darwin was reading his book on the Beagle. Lyell's layers and fossils and ages are still in use today. Lyell was an atheist. Darwin's formal training was in theology.
Science. Pure science.
colec001 2 years ago
I like how all of their "expert" witnesses did a runner.
jazzx251 2 years ago
They were poorly equipped, it's true. Pat yourself on the back for beating a retard.
colec001 2 years ago
I wouldn't call you that yet.
jazzx251 2 years ago
wow. This series is just blowing me away. I actually thought it was around 10% of people who thought ID was a science, not the numbers mentioned here.
philthy122 2 years ago
Was this video hit by a vote bot? Damn Creationist morons!
CrashtUnBurned 2 years ago 3
Looking at Intelligent Design objectively, it seems to be psuedo-science to me...like astrology and eugenics.
BrooklynJiujitsu 2 years ago 5
That's because IT IS :D
Sqirril 2 years ago 5
why doesn't eugenics work?
diomedes39 2 years ago
@diomedes39 Eugenics doesn't work because nobody knows what will constitute 'fitness' in an unpredictable world. The gene that predisposes towards scycle cell anemia also protects against malaria. Do you want it in or out? Nazi eugenics would have produced blond, blue eyed Herrenvolk who would all have been dead from melanoma cancer in this world of thinning ozone protection.
gamesbok 1 year ago
@gamesbok All that Eugenics means is to purposefully manipulate genes in a population through selective breeding. The Nazi's did try to use Eugenics to make supermen but that speaks nothing about the effectiveness of the theory. Besides, not all of us pale people have melanoma haha.
diomedes39 1 year ago
@diomedes39 Germans are tall and blond and blue-eyed, but not as tall and blond and blue-eyed as they think they are, especially when they are short, dark Austrians with a sense of destiny.
Eugenics has proven successful in giving us livestock, but anyone who has payed the vets bills for a thoroughbred might look at hybred vigour with envy. Attempting to narrow the gene pool is fraught with hazard.
gamesbok 1 year ago
@gamesbok Again, that doesn't really matter but I don't feel like arguing about this.
diomedes39 1 year ago
Heathens! Blasphemer! Burn the witch!
Sounds like the dark ages doesn't it?
therock27374 2 years ago 4
Yep, only now the shoe is on the other foot. Facts be damned, burn the Christian!
colec001 2 years ago
Ok, so like Aliens could have created us!!!!!!!!
BigWillieB88 2 years ago 2
why do they insist on comparing none living objects (which don't evolve) with living thing (which do evolve).
TromboneUSAlabama 2 years ago
Show me. Darwin found finches. whole varieties of finches. he thought they were evolved, but the birders back in merry old England said they were all finches.
Instead of writing "Adaptations,"
Darwin wrote "Origins"
-Just who is bending the facts to their will, here?
colec001 2 years ago
This has nothing to due with my original comment
TromboneUSAlabama 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
O.F. P.A.N.D.A.S. A.N.D. P.E.O.P.L.E. = "Overwhelming Facts Prove A Necessary Designer Assembled Sequential Alphabet Notable DNA Provides Everyone Observing Plexiform Life Empirically!"
Antony Flew, the ultimate atheist and champion debater, succumbed to this evidence and has since left his dereistic atheistic beliefs. More will follow!!!!
Acronym77 2 years ago
S.P.E.C.I.F.I.E.D.
C.O.M.P.L.E.X.I.T.Y. = "Superintelligent Programmer Engineered Cell's Information Found In DNA. Cell's Operational Messaging Provides Library Entailing 'Xeroxed' Information Teleologically Yielded"
*please look up "Teleology".
I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.T.
D.E.S.I.G.N. = "I'm Now Typing Each Letter Like Intelligent Guidance Encoded Nature Too! DNA's Encoding Shows Intelligent Guidance Needed."
S.C.I.E.N.C.E. ="Specified Complexity Is Evidence Now Creator Exists!"
Acronym77 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
W.I.L.L.I.A.M. A. D.E.M.B.S.K.I. = "Working Intelligence Logically Left Irreducible, Amazing Molecular Assemblages. Designed Engines Must Be Showing Knowledgeable Inventor!"
Acronym77 2 years ago
A.C.R.O.N.Y.M. =
Annoying Creationist Really Only Nauseating Young-earth Moron
jazzx251 2 years ago
Thank goodness ;) they have teachers dedicated enough to fight for the rights, education and dignity of their students.
preachingsin 2 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
When I was in elementary I was an avowed atheist. The overwhelming majority believed in God. What about their rights?
Acronym77 2 years ago
They have church and religious schools if the market dictates them necessary. Science class in public school is for facts not fantastical conjecture.
preachingsin 2 years ago 4
What the heck all is this "Other Alternative Theories" Bullshit?
There are hundreds of different Theories out there, but Evolution is the only that has evidence to back it up!
Creationists need to get this whole Evolution=No God thing out of their heads!
Bowmaj21 2 years ago 4
Preach that to the "fellow" Evolutionists you think you share company with. You might be suprised...
colec001 2 years ago
How can that guy @ 1:37 look in a mirror and
not see that he has definitely evolved from
monkeys......I mean.....please!
paulusmagirl 2 years ago 13
I know...I know...
Albukhshi 2 years ago
The biggest problem for Creationists is which creation story would be adopted; Baha'i, Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Animism, Jainism, Zoroastrianism, Scientology, Cai Dai, etc
What the ID proponents are really saying is that they want THEIR version peddled over all other faith-based versions, the irony being most Christians don't even accept that version.
On the other hand, there is only one evolution story based on the data.
indoctus41 2 years ago 5
The evolution story began with finches. Finches. Not turkeys descended from Finches. The story was laid out first, then data was assimilated to support the model. -Did you know Dino DNA must be related to chicken DNA, else it is discarded? Why? PREDUDICE.
colec001 2 years ago
that is just lazy
Nades129 2 years ago
lol, i always knew the CIA was behind evolution.
sprins108 2 years ago 2
I had a person pushing that "intelligent agent" line to me once. When I asked if it was possible that the intelligent agent could be an alien species rather than a supernatural being, they said no. When I asked why not, they couldn't give me an answer and instead started quoting scripture. The spychology at work here is really startling.
SayYesToReason 2 years ago 4
what does spychology mean? I've never heard the word before.
AlexKincaid 2 years ago
The thing that gets me most about "not believing" in evolution is this:
Once you understand the history, you have to be aware that human beings were not the first, nor will we be the last dominant species on our planet. The sun's got a good 13-billion years or so left in her.
Why deny yourself the true riddles of the universe?
hawkian 2 years ago 6
Because when people see something fantastic they are desperate to see something that fantastic in their lives.
The real problem here is that creationists look at themselves as the good guys. & in every fantasy story there are villians.
Yujifanik 2 years ago 3
The moral of this story, run for your local school board. Pay attention to what they're doing with your children.
Atheocracy888 2 years ago 6
Thx for posting this vid.
mangetuffa 2 years ago 3
Pitiful people, wasted so much money on such stupid trial.
bigboss025 2 years ago
How petty are you when you have to burn a kids drawings because it offends your worldview.
halelorf 3 years ago 17
haha..so true
gottspieler 2 years ago
I know. It says a lot, doesn't it?
SayYesToReason 2 years ago
Is this whole series of videos JUST about the trial?
245Greenfieldchan 3 years ago
Some of these i.d. guys must have some serious poker faces to be able to say what they do and not break down laughing. Guess Bill Maher is right, if you don't add 'lol' to your statement it must be true.
bvthedemon 3 years ago 15
I could not agree more. I can't believe I use to be one of those nutjobs
truthseeker7000 3 years ago 5
"Amen, brother" ;D
IconOfSin88 3 years ago 4
Religious fanatics like Bill Buckingham need to be kept out of power.
Darkninja105 3 years ago 31