Yes, it could be ((3^2)*(9^8))^-2 make it ((9)^1)*(9)^8)^-2 equals (9^9)^-2 which would be 9^-18. You could also do it this way and you still get the same answer in the end i.e. 9^-18 = 3^-36. Which method to choose is up to you. Which ever makes your life easier
Please HELP:Can't you on the last problem-- ((3^2)*(9^8))^-2 make it ((9)^1)*(9)^8)^-2 THEN (9^7)^-2 THEN 9^-14 Wouldn't this be the same thing?? Hope you get what I'm asking...
Thank you! When that last equation came up i paused the video and worked it out. Based on what you showed before, i used a different method and came up with the same answer. I despise math generally so that was great, normally i'd have to do it the long way.
After over two decades of detesting math and having nightmares about math, I finally get it! If only i had an awesome teacher like you-back in the day! Thank you! I am currently a freelance writer, but now my appetite for math is refreshingly addictive
Brilliant. I can do algebra now. And I am useless at maths. Jesus christ, man, thankyou so much for this stuff. Especially the DNA one. Helped a bunch.
@desirearmelle Basically if your given a problem with different bases e.g: 2^3 x 5^3 there is no more you can do with it because its all in its most simplified form .
I thought when you have (2 x 9)^100, you multilply 2 and 9 because they are in PARENTHESES and then solve it by it's exponent. (P.E.M.D.A.S.) So my question is why did you instead do the exponent to each one first 2^100 x 9^100 then just left like that?????
Aren't in many senses, the third and fourth laws for exponents kind of the same thing. Because really, when you are prescribing the exponent to the numbers within the parentheses, you are essentially just multiplying the exponent by 1 to all the numbers within the parentheses.
Indeed this is the only way to learn anything...this is applicable...but simply remembering rules and formulas is stupid...everything else is bull....Salman...Thank you...and i can understand your satisfaction from this...beautyful :)
i agree, i think that trying to prove to yourself that that is how something works is a lot better, because like you said, if you memorize them, you can forget them eventually , thank you !!
You are an absolute genius mate. I can't possibly thank you enough! You're more to the point, easier to follow AND you get through it in half the time of my teacher, who's works at one of the best schools in Australia. Thanks again.
Thanks for making all of these. I'm brushing up on my math skills, basically for the fun of it. I'm incredibly grateful for these videos; I can't imagine how grateful those are who actually require these.
2 times 7 is in parentheses, it seems that the answer should have been 14 to the 3rd power if you were to solve the parentheses first and the exponents second.I may be wrong because im new to this. But if you have a explanation for my confusion it would be greatly appreciated.
No, if you look closely 2, has the exponent attached. In no way would that be 14. That's 2 multiplied by itself 7 times. = 128 Let the professor do his thing.
I believe we are all wrong, (except the professor)we are suppose to distribute the exponent into each base in the parentheses, third power of 2 is 8, of 7 is 343, so simplified it would be 8 times 343 equals 2744. I think i made the mistake of not understanding the distributive property, thank you sal for the vids, you are making the world a better place.
Actually you can look at it either way. If you watch earlier in the video he multiplies out. You could have grouped them together (2x2x2x7x7x7) in this case it is more apparent that as 2^3X7^3. You could have also left them in combination ((2x7)x(2x7)x(2x7)). If you left it as such a combination it would then be 14^3. Different ways of writing the same thing thats all. Do not get confused.
Actually the exponent is attached to both the 2 and the 7 as noted by the parenthesis, so in this case it could be looked at as (14)^3. You are correct though that is the exponent was just attached to the 2
You are soooooo helpful! Thank you so much!
ShineyMew7 19 hours ago
like lprotonl said, how can we repay you? you should at least put an ad on this so you can make at least some money of of it.
kerolification 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lollylee69
Yes, it could be ((3^2)*(9^8))^-2 make it ((9)^1)*(9)^8)^-2 equals (9^9)^-2 which would be 9^-18. You could also do it this way and you still get the same answer in the end i.e. 9^-18 = 3^-36. Which method to choose is up to you. Which ever makes your life easier
shakilmujeeb 2 months ago
Please HELP:Can't you on the last problem-- ((3^2)*(9^8))^-2 make it ((9)^1)*(9)^8)^-2 THEN (9^7)^-2 THEN 9^-14 Wouldn't this be the same thing?? Hope you get what I'm asking...
lollylee69 2 months ago
thank you!!!
bitsofplastic 3 months ago
this is so handy. help me get my SAT scores up! thank you
Thew26XppX 4 months ago
@Thew26XppX How can you study well for SAT and what type of questions are there on it?
vediocamera 4 months ago
i would love to go to a school with teachers like this guy T_T
JRxxAKAxxNOZY 4 months ago
thanks a lot Mr. Khan!
lilauz 4 months ago
my teacher gave me this problem 6x6x6x2 how do you show that in an exponent?
punkdudes2000 4 months ago
6 to the third power times 2
metaldave08096 3 months ago
Thank you! When that last equation came up i paused the video and worked it out. Based on what you showed before, i used a different method and came up with the same answer. I despise math generally so that was great, normally i'd have to do it the long way.
Realisticz16 4 months ago
After over two decades of detesting math and having nightmares about math, I finally get it! If only i had an awesome teacher like you-back in the day! Thank you! I am currently a freelance writer, but now my appetite for math is refreshingly addictive
titinta3 5 months ago
Comment removed
titinta3 5 months ago
great video thanks for your contribution
lordsxman 5 months ago
Very helpful and nicely explained.
DaleLaV 7 months ago
Brilliant. I can do algebra now. And I am useless at maths. Jesus christ, man, thankyou so much for this stuff. Especially the DNA one. Helped a bunch.
hoiszhdfoifh22 8 months ago
please come to my school and teach
Br0nXb0y96 9 months ago
I wish you were my math teacher!
OkayCompuuter 10 months ago
thanks .but how do you approach a problem with different bases
desirearmelle 1 year ago
@desirearmelle Basically if your given a problem with different bases e.g: 2^3 x 5^3 there is no more you can do with it because its all in its most simplified form .
iSmiffy95 9 months ago
thanks dude you made me get an A- on my math test! :-)
feinart2009 1 year ago
Thank you! Another excellent video on exponents.
raykasprowicz 1 year ago
thank you soooo much man! wish more people could do videos like this!
very very good!
riccovieira 1 year ago
this = very helpful all algebra students shud watch this
missaman93 1 year ago
I thought when you have (2 x 9)^100, you multilply 2 and 9 because they are in PARENTHESES and then solve it by it's exponent. (P.E.M.D.A.S.) So my question is why did you instead do the exponent to each one first 2^100 x 9^100 then just left like that?????
vasquezg86 1 year ago 2
God bless you my friend, I know there is a special place in heaven for you, and people like you.
nicholsjoshua15 1 year ago
Very Informative. Listening carefully can spark sudden realizations! It's amazing. Thanks.
tommygun415 1 year ago
Thanks . you really helped a lot . I appreciate it a lot (:
perhapslovehurts 1 year ago
What if you had (-3)^7 X (-3)^3 is that equal to -3^10 or would it be a positive??
nenax24x 1 year ago
@nenax24x No it wouldn't be positive, because of your original base which is negative. So yeah, the soulution would be: -3^10.
youcandomathtoo 1 year ago
God bless you Sal!!!!!!!!!
RebornAc3 1 year ago
GREAT JOB ,
aimasood 1 year ago
Really good and easy to understand!
pennclick 1 year ago
Aren't in many senses, the third and fourth laws for exponents kind of the same thing. Because really, when you are prescribing the exponent to the numbers within the parentheses, you are essentially just multiplying the exponent by 1 to all the numbers within the parentheses.
MarvelsofaLifetime 1 year ago
these vids rlly help me a lot:D
mickeymouselover1998 2 years ago
Indeed this is the only way to learn anything...this is applicable...but simply remembering rules and formulas is stupid...everything else is bull....Salman...Thank you...and i can understand your satisfaction from this...beautyful :)
rancic 2 years ago
kibur jou`re stupid as fuck! So do fuck off to twilight trailers!
rancic 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
my dad showed me this site and i dont like it but it gave me an excuse to be on youtube when i am not supposed to so tanks sal
kibur914 2 years ago
THANK YOU SO MUCH
SaraPunkzz 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Really helpful. But in school we are learning problems a bit more advanced like: x^-3 y^3 . 3x^0
and
m^2 n^-3 / 2nm^3
So maybe if you could make a video on those, than that would be great.
scraper1000 2 years ago
i agree, i think that trying to prove to yourself that that is how something works is a lot better, because like you said, if you memorize them, you can forget them eventually , thank you !!
sk8tterpriincessss 2 years ago
Are there separate videos with exercises or something? thanks
JackMoranRain 2 years ago
this is very helpful!
yumihitomi 2 years ago
AWESOME!! I wish I found this years ago...
THANKS FOR CREATING THESE VIDEOS!!!
alstrup69 2 years ago
gee, how confusing.
But still...
Thanks for all the help!
Wafflesmart 2 years ago
2:00 Why isn't it equal to 32^50?
Thank you!!!!
TheTmagic 2 years ago
.....your kidding right, this guy is better than great, he has gotten me through 5th, 6th, working on 7th, and im sure he'll help through the rest.
ecto98 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hmm i guess this is ok
seldemitria 2 years ago
u took time of urs to create this beautiful lesson and the very least i can do is take a sec to say THANKS!
lprotonl 2 years ago 54
@lprotonl dont need to, google gave him 2 million dollars.
qrais 4 months ago
You are an absolute genius mate. I can't possibly thank you enough! You're more to the point, easier to follow AND you get through it in half the time of my teacher, who's works at one of the best schools in Australia. Thanks again.
ktrel54 2 years ago 38
@ktrel54 I'm just gona throw it out there that i knew you would be an aussie after i saw "mate" :P
tho i fully agree that hes a genius and helps a lot of people
sirsagan 2 months ago
Thanks for making all of these. I'm brushing up on my math skills, basically for the fun of it. I'm incredibly grateful for these videos; I can't imagine how grateful those are who actually require these.
Vanderjuice 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nerds
chla15 2 years ago
you rock brah lets be friends
fangs1234 3 years ago
nice vid
PureInsanity00 3 years ago 3
2 times 7 is in parentheses, it seems that the answer should have been 14 to the 3rd power if you were to solve the parentheses first and the exponents second.I may be wrong because im new to this. But if you have a explanation for my confusion it would be greatly appreciated.
adam700r 3 years ago
Your right.
mlehbleh22 3 years ago
No, if you look closely 2, has the exponent attached. In no way would that be 14. That's 2 multiplied by itself 7 times. = 128 Let the professor do his thing.
diamondstinger 2 years ago
I believe we are all wrong, (except the professor)we are suppose to distribute the exponent into each base in the parentheses, third power of 2 is 8, of 7 is 343, so simplified it would be 8 times 343 equals 2744. I think i made the mistake of not understanding the distributive property, thank you sal for the vids, you are making the world a better place.
adam700r 2 years ago
Actually you can look at it either way. If you watch earlier in the video he multiplies out. You could have grouped them together (2x2x2x7x7x7) in this case it is more apparent that as 2^3X7^3. You could have also left them in combination ((2x7)x(2x7)x(2x7)). If you left it as such a combination it would then be 14^3. Different ways of writing the same thing thats all. Do not get confused.
morrisdn 2 years ago
Actually the exponent is attached to both the 2 and the 7 as noted by the parenthesis, so in this case it could be looked at as (14)^3. You are correct though that is the exponent was just attached to the 2
morrisdn 2 years ago
thankkk u :D
N3SLiiiHAN 3 years ago
Thank you so much for this lesson! It's amazing to be able to find this here. I really appreciate this video and cannot thank you enough, take care.
Fiorucci79 4 years ago 6
thank yew this helped out alot
jolzar14 4 years ago