The reason why Nasa looks at mars is because they already know earth is doomed. Were Next up to get fucked-u see, mars is where they plan to rebuild and leave the rest of us to cook. They knew this for quite some time. The object is Mars and building life on Mars, to escape Earth and live on!
The scaremongers who like to say that earth will end up like Venus are ignoring two important differences between the two planets. First of all, it's closer to the sun. It also rotates so slow, that a day is longer than a year. That gives the sun much, much more time to heat up each point on the surface. This "greenhouse effect" isn't the only thing to blame for the extreme heat on our sister planet, which is more like Hell, than Eden.
i belive the is great cover up about venus since the data from first proves say it might be a living planted, but the russians tray i think the 2 or 3 times more and they never really get the data for what is laying under the atmostfere,perhaps you can say the sulphuric acid is poison but ozone is poison aswell so we can jump to conclusions yet
We agree that Venus warrants more exploration. The Soviet's choice to concentrate on Venus so early in their space program seems illogical. Why skip over our moon, the closest body to Earth? Also, considering the USA insisted the Soviet's could not be trusted; it's strange we take their word for anything-regarding anything. Then, we must as why Venus is seen as blue in all of the photographs from Voyager, but is depicted as a murky yellow in most recent illustrations.
Scientists doing what they are told to: why not? but should it mean that NASA (if given credits by the US government) should be in line with current US government, which has been one of the most involved in rejecting the possibility that human activity has a consequence on a global climate change?
Warming experienced on Venus: well, logics and common sense should tell at once that it should be better to focus on what Mankind does, not what Nature doe
One should feed a huge ego to think that undoing Nature is the priority.
Maybe clearer, a change on Venus does absolutely not go against the very possibility that human activity impacts on the GCC.
Hey, why not use the very fact that human life expectancy is limited by Nature to dismiss any charge of murder: shouldnt be removed the charge that a man dies before his natural end because it is known that noone lives eternally?
The same here: because they might be two natural phenomena overlappi
one should be dismissed in favour of the other. (two phenonema overlapping: one natural and the other human made)
This tells a lot about the success of the concept of responsibility.
I dont know your vid log and maybe you have already a vid hinging around it but I am looking forward the moment when you are going to blame this or that person to cast their responsability away. I really am.
Scientists are increasingly abandoning science for politics. Sad, but true. Michael Crichton has written lots on this.
For 400,000 years or so, there has been a rough correlation between "greenhouse gas" concentration and temperature. This history is used to make the global warming case.
What the "scientists" fail to mention is that temperature rise always precedes gas concentration increase. So, co2 and methane cannot have caused temperature rise.
the atmosphere is made up of sulphuric acid, in fat thats what you'd be breathing if you went there. Nasa's grand plan for MARS is to eventually create an atmosphere and then colonise it. you think colonising a planet with an atmosphere filled with Ph levels like venus is worth spending money on? also the planet is actually hotter than mercury, it 900 degress there, and its completly uninhabitable. Mars is the way to go ;)
perhaps,... i have a history of jumping to conclusions. From the second time round see that you are looking for history of our planet, and not future exploration as what i first jumped to. Your right, we need to know our history. Great vid mate, looking at it properly without being a bstard this time, i can see you point clearly. You can delete the othermessageif u want.
No prob man. In fact, I really appreciate any comment on my videos. For that reason, I don't delete any comments, even the ones which suggest that I take my own life:):)... Check back in and thanks again, CRK
Venus Envy is also a web comic >.>
Surathan 3 years ago
The reason why Nasa looks at mars is because they already know earth is doomed. Were Next up to get fucked-u see, mars is where they plan to rebuild and leave the rest of us to cook. They knew this for quite some time. The object is Mars and building life on Mars, to escape Earth and live on!
low7free 3 years ago
The scaremongers who like to say that earth will end up like Venus are ignoring two important differences between the two planets. First of all, it's closer to the sun. It also rotates so slow, that a day is longer than a year. That gives the sun much, much more time to heat up each point on the surface. This "greenhouse effect" isn't the only thing to blame for the extreme heat on our sister planet, which is more like Hell, than Eden.
chabba77 3 years ago
i belive the is great cover up about venus since the data from first proves say it might be a living planted, but the russians tray i think the 2 or 3 times more and they never really get the data for what is laying under the atmostfere,perhaps you can say the sulphuric acid is poison but ozone is poison aswell so we can jump to conclusions yet
CactosS 3 years ago
We agree that Venus warrants more exploration. The Soviet's choice to concentrate on Venus so early in their space program seems illogical. Why skip over our moon, the closest body to Earth? Also, considering the USA insisted the Soviet's could not be trusted; it's strange we take their word for anything-regarding anything. Then, we must as why Venus is seen as blue in all of the photographs from Voyager, but is depicted as a murky yellow in most recent illustrations.
CrackrocKid 3 years ago
Sounds like a self defeating argumentation.
Scientists doing what they are told to: why not? but should it mean that NASA (if given credits by the US government) should be in line with current US government, which has been one of the most involved in rejecting the possibility that human activity has a consequence on a global climate change?
Warming experienced on Venus: well, logics and common sense should tell at once that it should be better to focus on what Mankind does, not what Nature doe
TheCZMan 3 years ago
One should feed a huge ego to think that undoing Nature is the priority.
Maybe clearer, a change on Venus does absolutely not go against the very possibility that human activity impacts on the GCC.
Hey, why not use the very fact that human life expectancy is limited by Nature to dismiss any charge of murder: shouldnt be removed the charge that a man dies before his natural end because it is known that noone lives eternally?
The same here: because they might be two natural phenomena overlappi
TheCZMan 3 years ago
one should be dismissed in favour of the other. (two phenonema overlapping: one natural and the other human made)
This tells a lot about the success of the concept of responsibility.
I dont know your vid log and maybe you have already a vid hinging around it but I am looking forward the moment when you are going to blame this or that person to cast their responsability away. I really am.
TheCZMan 3 years ago
Scientists are increasingly abandoning science for politics. Sad, but true. Michael Crichton has written lots on this.
For 400,000 years or so, there has been a rough correlation between "greenhouse gas" concentration and temperature. This history is used to make the global warming case.
What the "scientists" fail to mention is that temperature rise always precedes gas concentration increase. So, co2 and methane cannot have caused temperature rise.
RogerOnTheRight 3 years ago
The video isn't about colonizing Venus.
galanetics 3 years ago
It's about a lot of things:). Thanks for watching and commenting, CRK
CrackrocKid 3 years ago
the atmosphere is made up of sulphuric acid, in fat thats what you'd be breathing if you went there. Nasa's grand plan for MARS is to eventually create an atmosphere and then colonise it. you think colonising a planet with an atmosphere filled with Ph levels like venus is worth spending money on? also the planet is actually hotter than mercury, it 900 degress there, and its completly uninhabitable. Mars is the way to go ;)
ConspiracyTheory81 3 years ago
I hear you dawg. But you may have missed my point, crk
CrackrocKid 3 years ago
perhaps,... i have a history of jumping to conclusions. From the second time round see that you are looking for history of our planet, and not future exploration as what i first jumped to. Your right, we need to know our history. Great vid mate, looking at it properly without being a bstard this time, i can see you point clearly. You can delete the othermessageif u want.
ConspiracyTheory81 3 years ago
No prob man. In fact, I really appreciate any comment on my videos. For that reason, I don't delete any comments, even the ones which suggest that I take my own life:):)... Check back in and thanks again, CRK
CrackrocKid 3 years ago