Sue Bradford speaks on the 90 Day "fire at will" Bill

[devpatel12]

I DIsagree the rules...

[airelomeiel]

shes right

[MidnightCardinal]

Should have gone through the select commitie

[strainedcalf1]

Totally disagree you should be able to test drive a employee before you hire him, if he talks well at a interview but them proves to be useless or worse dangerous, see you later.

[thatcher88]

@strainedcalf1 That might be ok in theory, but there is nothing to stop an unfair dismissal of an employee. Somebody shouldn't be fired without a good reason, it could mean that their whole lives and financial affairs could be sent into chaos, particulary if they are feeding a family or they have bills to pay, and there is nothing to stop a boss discriminating or firing somebody for personal reasons. 90 days of uncertainty is 90 days too many.

[gregbodnar]

Sue's comments on why this bill should have gone through select committee review are right on the money. I could have done with less of the playing on emotions, but her points stand to reason.

[SiliconBong]

Couldn't agree more.