Un son si doux à l'oreille des révolutionnaires et des antifascistes. Vive le peuple soviétique et son Armée Rouge, vainqueurs de l'hitlérisme et du fascisme ! Vive les communistes du monde entier et leur chef de l'époque, le camarade Joseph Vissarionovitch Staline, l'homme de la victoire, l'homme du socialisme, l'homme de la paix !
well the one thing is true that RUSSIA came up whith this weapon in 1943 and fucked Germany at WW2 , and they are still blaming their lose on a Russian winter :) i guess pigs are never learn , so bring it on again! we dont give the fuck.
To get close to enuff Dakka you need to have outrageous amounts of weapons on a single object. This seems to count as something that has close to enuff Dakka.
The fear when on a dark night on the enemies side see these light up the skies like falling stars and then the fearsome sound, must have been a horrible feeling to be in a barrage by the Katyusha
Guadeloupe (including Sen-Bartelmi and the north of island of Sacred Martin) The French Guiana To [correct] In Africa and on AntarktideAlzhir Tunis Morocco The French Western Africa Mauritania Senegal The French Sudan (now Mali) The French Guinea (now Guinea) Ivory coast (now the Cat-d'ivuar) Niger Upper Volta (now Burkina Faso) Dahomey (now Benin) That The French Equatorial Africa
@sss7773 "island of Sacred Martin"- yah google translate is not perfect, you mean Ile de Saint -Martin. This is a colonial past of France, but think why most of this colonies want back to France. Guadeloupe and St Martin is still french and is was proposed a referendum,but they(guadeloupians) refused as in Nouvelle Caledonie et Réunion. France bring civilization, Russia bring war and death! God help us
Hundreds countries France occupied and arranged there terrible slaughter-houses as in Algeria, Vietnam, isn't worse than Hitler, practically till 70th years
The USSR occupied nobody, well except for the countries which were for Hitler as Girmanija, Hungary, Romania, and that economy of the USSR practically contained the given countries and on one of them there were no death camps, as at France
@sss7773 All GULAG was extermination camp! URSS killed more inocent people than Hitler and ?France?. You need seriosly to revise your knowlege - France is a world brilliant,They left peacefully Algeria even it was 1 milion french against only 10 milions barbarians there is not an arabic land!
@aduhux Montreal Territory of Great Lakes (фр. Pays d’en Haut) Акадия (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and island St. John (Prince Edward island) Hudson bay "New Land" (Newfoundland) Louisiana Illinois The lower Louisiana Saint Pierre and Miquelon Haiti (1677—1804) Martinique
The French Southern and Antarctic Territories (Kerguelen, etc., including the possession not recognized as the international community of the Antarctic Adelie coast)
To [correct] In OkeaniiNovaja Caledonia
French Polynesia (including island Klipperton)
Уоллис and Futuna
New Hebrides (a condominium with Great Britain, nowadays Vanuatu)
What such world in colonies could be, yes there Frenchmen millions local people which have been armed by spears, killed from machine guns, and all gold and other values took out to France
GULAG is a system of corrective camps where people on a judgement received periods and quitted on will
@SuperRatchetclank You are mistakent, the development of the nebelwerfer- family startet after WWI and the first prototypes of the common 15cm/41 version were tested in the summer of 1940, two years before Stalingrad.
Every nation has his own mark. For example, Germans got really good soilders, some great officers (like Rommel and his "Ghost Division") and a exelent but expensive equipment (Like MP40, Stg. 44, Stuka's, Foke's Wulf, V-2, Tigers, etc.); While Soviets had less excelency (because the soldiers were citizens), but real good and cheap weapons after all (Katyushka, PPsh41, Mosin-Nagrat, AK-47, T-34, etc).
@Rocketromano343 i disagree - the soviet soldiers on the eastern front displayed suicidal bravery which can not be compared to their western counterparts
@Rocketromano343 Soviet-made La-7 outclassed Focke Wulf 190 in all respects, and even the Me 109 G. Also Soviet Union had the FASTEST plane in ww2, the BI 1, which could reach speeds of up to 990 km/h, and Is-2 could hold its own with the Tiger any time any place
@Rocketromano343 V1 was very imprecise(were not a big threat for the Allies).V2 came at the end of the war,when the Russians occupied Peneminde .American flying fortress was more effective than V2.V2 came very late for Germany.
The first battery Katyushas (BM-13) went into action near the Orsha railway station on 7 July 1941 and proved an immediate success.The scream of the Katyusha rockets led the Germans to call them Stalin's Organs.
The launchers were mounted on a variety of American, British and Canadian lorries, (initially mounted on the ZiS-6 soviet truck).American had multiple rocket launcher too .(Sherman Calliope France 1944)T34 Calliope system.
My friend's grandfather was in the polish army or something in the 50's in the soviet bloc and he says that the sound of this thing firing is the most horrifying sound you can hear.
Nor US nor UK had real multiple rocket louncers in WW 2. Anyway, even if they did have them, they would anyway have to fight becaouse none weapon but the bomb can destroy enemy completely. Russians had losses in millions even in 43-45 years when they employed Katyusas on large scale and when they were overwhelmingly dominant to Germans.
@bgmaliradojica Maybe not on the scale or success of the Katyusha and its variants, but didn't at least the U.S have one system in place, the Calliope? Maybe it wasn't a purpose-built multiple rocket launcher, but it has to at least count, right? And what about the Germans and their Nebelwerfers (for sake of argument, lets limit that to just the ones they managed to mount on things like Maultiers and halftracks)? Not trying to be nasty here, just asking a question.
How can anything last through all those rockets? I just saw a documentary of when USA went to Iwo Jima to take the island from the Japanese. They had rockets going off crazy like this too on the ships.. but they still had to go in and fight the Japanese who hid in tunnels and all.
Probably Hitler threw all strenght to Kursk ,but Russian expect offensive, they have spy in German military and at same time Allies land on Sicily ,Hitler recall offensive ..that was end of Kursk operation ,because Hitler probaly move strenght at west Europe expect invasion of west Europe .
the problem was never the leaders, it was always the people..with that i don't mean german people suck and are evil, ..i mean people, the common people are ignorant, we are in the core arrogant, greedy, politicians just take advantage of that fact.. do you think this is impossible to happen again? ..if politicians would want a war this would happen again, no problem, .. to get people to hate people, that is very easy, ..you just say, Russia is the problem you have no job..and war follows...
@wnxsilence the people who you are referring to are wrong. It was the people who suffred not the leaders. The leaders of nazi-germany where fascist and not the soldiers. keep that in mind ;)
If it was a BM-31-12 it was 12 300 MM warheads hitting in a smallish area in a short period of time.
volirrik, rocket ammunition is actually cheaper than traditional artillery. It's the guidance systems that run the prices up so high on modern rocket munitions
@termoso Useless weappon: unprecise, weak, expensive. The Chinese were able (or would have been at least, but judged it senseless) to build such a weappon 1000 years ago. Soviets just won because of masses and masses of ressources which overwhelmed German quality. That was all. Soviets are the greatest mass murderers of the human history - even against their own people. It's a shame to search for glory in this scum bastard red army. Not only a shame, but it is brain-sick!
@zentralwerkstatt Useless? Say that to the nazis that were shitting their pants the moment they heard it. Maybe chinese had it invented 1000 years ago as you claim yet the Soviets were the ones with unmatched artillery firepower during WW2.
Soviets also had best tanks during 2nd part of the War, fyi.
They won not because of resources (or rather not only because of resources) but because of the sheer unbreakable willpower of people and due to the genius war tacticians like Marshal Zhukov.
@criosray it sounds really that you're a fan of the communists. But anyway the T-34 was a very good start in improving tanks. But the Königstiger was way better then the russian tanks. you've also to know that the Russians could make for example. 200 T-34's en the Germans produced like 10 Königstigers. A german wanted a perfect tank. good painting and the final touch. The russians didn't. if the tank was ugly so what for them. so lets say its first the time that was missing by the germans.
@edderd8 Sounds more like you are a communist hater. Let's get the facts straight: T-34 was superior to Königstiger or any other tank at those days. It was more mobile, more durable and one of the most important things - it was cheaper to mass produce it.
Here are some clues for you about Tiger II: "the tests revealed the tanks to be severely defective; the transmission and suspension broke down very frequently and the engine was prone to overheating and consequential failure.
@edderd8 Additionally, the Soviets opinion was of deficiencies in the armor after firing many anti-tank rounds at the same target. Not only did they report that the metal was of shoddy quality (a problem not particular to the Tiger II—as the war progressed, the Germans found it harder and harder to obtain the alloys needed for high-quality steel), but the welding was also, despite "careful workmanship", extremely poor.
@criosray The photos of post-action destroyed Tiger IIs tell a different story.
Not a single shot penetrates the front of the tank. There are also photos from 1944/45 where you see Panthers with twenty impacts deflected at the front. You are talking out of your ass as usual with no basis in facts. But that is hardly surprising from a commie-lover.
“We had nothing comparable.” —Friedrich von Mellenthin (Panzer Battles)
"One of the first known encounters with a T-34 was by the 17th Panzer Division which was spotted by the Dniepr River, it crushed a 37mm anti-tank gun, blew up two Panzer IIs and went on to leave nine more miles of destruction before being destroyed at close range by a howitzer."
@criosray Any more well known anecdotes about the T-34 you want to bore us with ? No one denies the T-34 was a better design than the german tanks in 1941. When they caught up, they demonstrated their engineering skills with the Panther in 1943, which was far superior to any T-34. Of course, by then it was far too late to change anything.
@RabidRat88 Panther was never superior to T-34, equal technically, inferior in the mean of higher production cost and problems with reliability.
T-34 improved over the years of war. 1941 T-34/76 (which Panther was 'copied' from) and T-34/85 (1944) are very different tanks, although they share the same hull pretty much.
Panther V had a wee bit better armor and better vision but also had a smaller gun, was larger and heavier which also meant that it wasn't as fast and agile on the battlefield.
@edderd8 "During the winter of 1941–42 the T-34 again dominated German tanks through its ability to move over deep mud or snow without bogging down; German tanks could not move over terrain the T-34 could handle."
"The German infantry, at that time armed mostly with PaK 36 37 mm (1.46 in) antitank gun, had no effective means of stopping T-34s"
@criosray yea maybe but I guess the war was from 1939-1945 not only the winter of 1941-1942. and Btw then was the battle of Stalingrad if i'm right. and normally could Paulus save the sixt army. but the responsable for the Luftwaffe promised Hitler he could supplie the german troups. but caused by the bad weather where the germans trapped. and Hitler was a stubard guy so. yea well u know it i guess. anyway after that winter the number of material killed the war not the ood quality of the sovjets
@edderd8 War was 1939 to 1945 actually. It's just that since Stalingrad the outcome was pretty much obvious. The whole idea of Blitzkrieg was to conquer (or at least break the spine of Red Army and take Moscow) Soviet Union within first months, preferably before the winter (yes, Hitler knew what kind of winters Russia had). And during the first weeks-months they were extremely successful, capturing hundreds of thousands but then nazis were slowed down so much that war turned into a slow grind.
@edderd8 Resources of course played a large part but by far not the greatest. If the Blitzkrieg hadn't failed the limited resources wouldn't matter.
My grandfather and grandmother fought in this war from the very begin (for Soviet) and till the very end so I know first hand what kind of sacrifices people had to make to achieve this victory.
@criosray well you can pretend it in an other way. its a tactic so you get familiar with it. the Blitzkrieg was very effective. but the shortage of resources and the inpossibility of the wheater and the hard resistance made a blitzkrieg impossible. the Germans hadn't the ability to use resources for cheap. their soldiers where very important and at the end the soldiers where rekruuts what the hell they did know about how they had to fight. Soldiers with an age of 18-25 barely know what it is .
@edderd8 Blitzkrieg was effective until it failed. There was no shortage of resources for Blitzkrieg. And more than that - the nazi had a far better army in all means for the Blitzkrieg. In June 1941 German army had around 3 million (including 200,000 from its allies), this included 142 infantry divisions, 17 panzer divisions and 4,000 tanks. The whole Axis deployed more than 5 millions against Soviet Russia while the Red Army had only about 2.9 millions on the western side.
@edderd8 and additionally to that the equipment of the Red Army was not anywhere as good as nazis as I mentioned before nor Soviet was trully prepared for this war due to how stern and stupid Stalin was hoping that Hitler won't break the Pact of Molotov-Ribbentrop...
@edderd8 yeah, and russians born with knowledge on how to fight? 18-25 eh? The Soviet mobilized every men from 16 y.o. in 1941, and during the actual war even the kids were fighting.
@criosray no but they weren't trained at all they just took a gun and shoot. and i don't say this without respect. i respect a lot what the russian did. But a German was learned how to fight, how to kill, how to fight the war. Russians weren't. at the end soldiers of the Hitlerjugend went to the war. they weren't ready to fight... and Anyway joining kids in the army isn't that good. I mean on the front. in an army to train yea cv but not to go on front.
@edderd8 Ah, if you are saying that russians weren't trained as well. That's undeniable truth. In 1941 German army was much-much better trained. That was especially noticable in the skies where Luftwaffe was basically raping Soviet air forces (and not only because of the superior quality of the planes but mainly because of the high quality training and extensive experience of German pilots).
@edderd8 Besides in 30's Stalin butchered thousands of Red Army officers, including high command... If not Zhukov and war in Mongolia against Japan invasion in 39's the Barbarossa could probably succeed in 41-42 and the World that we know'd be very different today...
@criosray yea well. but just don't think Hitler wanted to destroy the jews in the first years. their just wasn't enough room to place them so they taught about extermination. and if you vieuw in theirs understanding it would been better after the war to do that. But anyway its blown up the hole Holocaust. of course its a horrible thing. But w/e i don't deny it I just believe its made bigger then it in real was. well anyway both of these things are bad so both are wrong
@edderd8 It was actually bigger as it wasn't only jews. My family lost 2 grandfather's sisters who were raped and murdered by nazis, and my grand-grand mother died of starvation in 1942. The civilian cities were bombed. The people were mass murdered or put to the extermination camps. About 1/3 of my country (Ukraine) population died during 1941-1945. That's more than 10 mil living souls. A lot of them were jews of course but only minority.
@criosray and also the germans went out of resources. while the Russians had a lot of them. another fact is. the germans were the best in their tacticals. Their allies however were a pain in the ass. they kapitulate easy. their weaponary wasn't that good. not enough trained. another thing is and for that look to documents. the russians fight good and finally won but that was cause if you are outnumbered by men u can get overwelmed you know. if the russians lose 2/3 if there men in a battle..
@edderd8 Yes, but in the begin of the War the German's war machine was far superior to what any other country had at the time. Soviet started the war literaly was naked army. A lot of soldier didn't even have guns in the very begin and had to loot it from the fallen enemies or comrades. I'm not even talking about aviation and tanks... The only resource that Soviet had in plenty was human resource. But it was as good as a meat shield. In 44-45 of course Soviet was already far far stronger...
sounds like bad news if you are on the other side
nonepu 11 hours ago
Love that sound. It's the sound of russian power in ww2
9632000a 20 hours ago
Sounds like a Tie Fighter Squadron
gregovit 1 day ago
Un son si doux à l'oreille des révolutionnaires et des antifascistes. Vive le peuple soviétique et son Armée Rouge, vainqueurs de l'hitlérisme et du fascisme ! Vive les communistes du monde entier et leur chef de l'époque, le camarade Joseph Vissarionovitch Staline, l'homme de la victoire, l'homme du socialisme, l'homme de la paix !
tchekist1937 6 days ago
war is hell
jackuppercut 1 week ago
People from all countrys of the world should be proud about what our grandfathers and grandmothers worked in that war.
MrSchiedsrichter 2 weeks ago
what a shit storm. :-)
edichkaa 2 weeks ago
well the one thing is true that RUSSIA came up whith this weapon in 1943 and fucked Germany at WW2 , and they are still blaming their lose on a Russian winter :) i guess pigs are never learn , so bring it on again! we dont give the fuck.
7777777fresh 3 weeks ago 3
The sound of the doors of hell opening.
DEChengst 1 month ago 3
Must have been terrifying to hear.
caddyj1 2 months ago
Why do I get the impression, that the germans didn't like the song being played?
442drag 2 months ago 6
Danke, reicht noch für längere Zeit..........
siggyschlimmfinger 2 months ago
Dear Santa Claus ...
pedropg233 2 months ago 5
i really want one
Luigirocksforever 3 months ago
this is how the katyusha was in ww2 ! but imagine how the modern katyusha is now ? russians are amazing smart people !
artur1992online 3 months ago
To get close to enuff Dakka you need to have outrageous amounts of weapons on a single object. This seems to count as something that has close to enuff Dakka.
thisissparta789789 3 months ago
Do we have Enuff dakka yet?
Theguy493 4 months ago
@Theguy493 DER IS NEVER ENUFF DAKKA... although this is a pretty good try.
Meshakhad 3 months ago
thumbs up if you will be shitting Bricks if this are fired upon you :D
LinksRoyal 4 months ago 2
Comment removed
LinksRoyal 4 months ago
The fear when on a dark night on the enemies side see these light up the skies like falling stars and then the fearsome sound, must have been a horrible feeling to be in a barrage by the Katyusha
rabies79 4 months ago 3
@rabies79
Absolutely! And abolutely amazing or unbelievable what happened 70 years before...
PrepaidKreditkarte81 3 months ago
zvuk je strava ,jednostavno savršenooo ! !
skipermali 4 months ago
sweet sound!
I want that on December 31. =)
Seelenfeuer666 5 months ago
@Seelenfeuer666 over to your house
adicontakt 4 months ago
@adicontakt =(
Seelenfeuer666 4 months ago
terrifying man really terrifying, I dont think any war film shown them I cant think of any
Henbot 5 months ago
NEVER ENUFF
Gigaspine7 5 months ago
Stalin's Orgies? Damn straight!
wc5216 6 months ago 2
stalins organ
88Ghillie 6 months ago
thanks for em, and t34
tatarqa 6 months ago
GHOST of soviet sociolistic republic
gajius 6 months ago
ONE M0:00RE TIME!!!
chobits389 6 months ago 3
I FUCKING LOVE THE SOUND IT MAKES !!!!!!!!!
unit731gamer 7 months ago 2
Welcome to hell..
neurochazm 7 months ago 4
@neurochazm hell yeah
Ikazu1991 7 months ago
LONG LIVE BM-13
LONG LIVE MOTHER RUSSIA
LONG LIVE KATYUSHA
kcpoynter 7 months ago 3
sounds like a foxhound
DutziDutzi123 8 months ago
sucks to be the enemy. hahahahaha
transformian2111 9 months ago 27
This has been flagged as spam show
Слава Советам за великую победу!!! Спасибо за мир на земле! Смерть нацикам, гниды, горите в аду со своим фюрером.
bomberfun1 9 months ago
WiiVVVhVVVVhVVVVVVVV!
Monstruo233 9 months ago
coisa bem russa essa arma: som sinistro, aterrorizante, som de morte.
sebastiaosoares 10 months ago
Ca c'est quelque chose. Ils devaient avoir la frousse les Allemands avec ça en face.
stakovsky82 10 months ago
в переводе на русский это значит смерть фашистким окупантам.
lilian20ful 10 months ago
it sounds like something out of star wars
Superchickenman159 11 months ago 22
@Superchickenman159
To me it sounds a bit like the Tardis. XD
JGRoblox23 1 week ago
When I think about sitting in a dark bunker and just hearing this sound... uhhh... scaring...
Tekkerist 11 months ago 2
The sound of fascists getting the shit kicked out of them.... Sweeeeet!!!
vonKressenstein 11 months ago 4
sss7773 11 months ago
@sss7773 "island of Sacred Martin"- yah google translate is not perfect, you mean Ile de Saint -Martin. This is a colonial past of France, but think why most of this colonies want back to France. Guadeloupe and St Martin is still french and is was proposed a referendum,but they(guadeloupians) refused as in Nouvelle Caledonie et Réunion. France bring civilization, Russia bring war and death! God help us
aduhux 11 months ago
I love the sound of Katyusha in the morning :D
jerrymail 11 months ago 3
GULAG=Red terror=Deportation=Soviet ocupation=Rusia=svoloci
aduhux 11 months ago
@aduhux
Hundreds countries France occupied and arranged there terrible slaughter-houses as in Algeria, Vietnam, isn't worse than Hitler, practically till 70th years
The USSR occupied nobody, well except for the countries which were for Hitler as Girmanija, Hungary, Romania, and that economy of the USSR practically contained the given countries and on one of them there were no death camps, as at France
sss7773 11 months ago
@sss7773 All GULAG was extermination camp! URSS killed more inocent people than Hitler and ?France?. You need seriosly to revise your knowlege - France is a world brilliant,They left peacefully Algeria even it was 1 milion french against only 10 milions barbarians there is not an arabic land!
aduhux 11 months ago
@aduhux In AziiSirija
Lebanon
The French settlements in India (now a part of India)
Guangzhou (1898-1946, now a part of the Peoples Republic of China)
The French Indochina — now Vietnam (Tonkin, to Annas, Kohinhina), Laos and Cambodia
To [correct] In Northern and Southern AmerikeNovaja France
Трёхречье
sss7773 11 months ago
sss7773 11 months ago
@aduhux Islands Eparse
The French Southern and Antarctic Territories (Kerguelen, etc., including the possession not recognized as the international community of the Antarctic Adelie coast)
To [correct] In OkeaniiNovaja Caledonia
French Polynesia (including island Klipperton)
Уоллис and Futuna
New Hebrides (a condominium with Great Britain, nowadays Vanuatu)
sss7773 11 months ago
@aduhux Gabon
Average Congo (now Republic Congo)
Ubangi-Shari (now Tsentralnoafrikansky republic)
Chad
Cameroon
Coast French Somalia (now Djibouti)
Madagascar
Comoro Islands (including Majottu)
Reunion, including:
sss7773 11 months ago
@aduhux The list of the countries occupied by France where it behaved, as Hitler
sss7773 11 months ago
@sss7773
What such world in colonies could be, yes there Frenchmen millions local people which have been armed by spears, killed from machine guns, and all gold and other values took out to France
GULAG is a system of corrective camps where people on a judgement received periods and quitted on will
sss7773 11 months ago
Wie ein feuerwerk ging die Katjuscha ab .
TheClaudius108 11 months ago
This sound like a "Katyusha"
MrParovozic 1 year ago
this sound like a NebelWerfer
0puest0 1 year ago
@0puest0 Its a katyusha. Nebelwerfer was a joke compare to BM-13
SuperRatchetclank 11 months ago
@SuperRatchetclank .
i know i know, but the first Misile atack is the NebelWerfer, next is Katiusha and the callipoe.
:D
0puest0 11 months ago
@0puest0 The nebelwerfer was created after the Katyuhsa in a desperate battle they could'nt won.
SuperRatchetclank 7 months ago
@SuperRatchetclank .
i never heart that. where u read this ?
link plz !
0puest0 7 months ago
@0puest0 Check that in wiki. Simple.
SuperRatchetclank 7 months ago
@SuperRatchetclank You are mistakent, the development of the nebelwerfer- family startet after WWI and the first prototypes of the common 15cm/41 version were tested in the summer of 1940, two years before Stalingrad.
koookeee 7 months ago
@koookeee Sources please !?!
SuperRatchetclank 6 months ago
Every nation has his own mark. For example, Germans got really good soilders, some great officers (like Rommel and his "Ghost Division") and a exelent but expensive equipment (Like MP40, Stg. 44, Stuka's, Foke's Wulf, V-2, Tigers, etc.); While Soviets had less excelency (because the soldiers were citizens), but real good and cheap weapons after all (Katyushka, PPsh41, Mosin-Nagrat, AK-47, T-34, etc).
Rocketromano343 1 year ago
@Rocketromano343 i disagree - the soviet soldiers on the eastern front displayed suicidal bravery which can not be compared to their western counterparts
demonbre 1 year ago
@Rocketromano343 Soviet-made La-7 outclassed Focke Wulf 190 in all respects, and even the Me 109 G. Also Soviet Union had the FASTEST plane in ww2, the BI 1, which could reach speeds of up to 990 km/h, and Is-2 could hold its own with the Tiger any time any place
ComradeFlorian31 1 year ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Yes, but they didn't had the V1 or V2. Im not being a pro-nazi, I'm just telling each nation has their own "speciality".
Rocketromano343 11 months ago
@Rocketromano343 V1 was very imprecise(were not a big threat for the Allies).V2 came at the end of the war,when the Russians occupied Peneminde .American flying fortress was more effective than V2.V2 came very late for Germany.
Mikele22000 10 months ago
nice sound / schön schön klingt gut =)
fourasses92 1 year ago
The first battery Katyushas (BM-13) went into action near the Orsha railway station on 7 July 1941 and proved an immediate success.The scream of the Katyusha rockets led the Germans to call them Stalin's Organs.
The launchers were mounted on a variety of American, British and Canadian lorries, (initially mounted on the ZiS-6 soviet truck).American had multiple rocket launcher too .(Sherman Calliope France 1944)T34 Calliope system.
Mikele22000 1 year ago
Comment removed
Mikele22000 1 year ago
My friend's grandfather was in the polish army or something in the 50's in the soviet bloc and he says that the sound of this thing firing is the most horrifying sound you can hear.
speeps84 1 year ago 2
It's my favorite music!
komintern78 1 year ago 2
Nor US nor UK had real multiple rocket louncers in WW 2. Anyway, even if they did have them, they would anyway have to fight becaouse none weapon but the bomb can destroy enemy completely. Russians had losses in millions even in 43-45 years when they employed Katyusas on large scale and when they were overwhelmingly dominant to Germans.
bgmaliradojica 1 year ago
@bgmaliradojica Maybe not on the scale or success of the Katyusha and its variants, but didn't at least the U.S have one system in place, the Calliope? Maybe it wasn't a purpose-built multiple rocket launcher, but it has to at least count, right? And what about the Germans and their Nebelwerfers (for sake of argument, lets limit that to just the ones they managed to mount on things like Maultiers and halftracks)? Not trying to be nasty here, just asking a question.
DorianMichaelsIII 1 year ago
How can anything last through all those rockets? I just saw a documentary of when USA went to Iwo Jima to take the island from the Japanese. They had rockets going off crazy like this too on the ships.. but they still had to go in and fight the Japanese who hid in tunnels and all.
arizonaresident1 1 year ago
the symphony of destruction
dee83h 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dee83h the symphony of REVENGE
malma3 1 year ago
Грозное оружие, бляд
MrMi6oci 1 year ago
HAHA Germany got owned :DDDD
fxPxx 1 year ago
will be fine over israel
melecio1 1 year ago
@melecio1 LOL
edderd8 1 year ago
that is so beuatiful sound i love arilary! and war!! so awsome
NarutoProductions7 1 year ago
Sounds to me the same like nebelwerfers.
helenblom1 1 year ago
Probably Hitler threw all strenght to Kursk ,but Russian expect offensive, they have spy in German military and at same time Allies land on Sicily ,Hitler recall offensive ..that was end of Kursk operation ,because Hitler probaly move strenght at west Europe expect invasion of west Europe .
Mikele22000 1 year ago
Comment removed
EfreitorVVS 1 year ago
was schreibt ihr denn alle da für einen blödsinn....
Schas09 1 year ago
I really like that sound PWSSHHHHHH...
mchief190 1 year ago 76
@mchief190 sounds like an angry elephant :-D
TTok33 7 months ago
@mchief190 its more like phiumm phiuum
yojelsonrc 5 months ago
Hey long live BM -13 !!!
Mikele22000 1 year ago 32
German arrogance taking a beating.
RabidRat88 1 year ago
now this children is why smart people dont fuck with russia
TheRealScotsSoldier 1 year ago
Mmm, dat's sum good dakka.
Xunkun 1 year ago
awesome sound that yields terrifying results!
megasyxx 1 year ago
I can see some german butt-hurt in this video :)
bogoid 1 year ago
Gotta love Stalin's Organ. It must have sucked to be a fascist piece of shit on the receiving end.
DSFARGEG00 1 year ago
@DSFARGEG00 Thanks, My Great Grandfather Brother died in Stalingrad.
ThunderTurkE 1 year ago
Comment removed
mffp1 1 year ago
@mffp1 No he was apart of the German 6th army, which was completely destroyed in Battle of Stalingrad.
ThunderTurkE 1 year ago
@DSFARGEG00 It still sucked less than being in a Gulag.
RabidRat88 1 year ago
@RabidRat88 You obviously have a vast experience?
criosray 1 year ago
@criosray And you have ? I have read accounts of it, which is already more than you have done I'm sure.
RabidRat88 1 year ago
@RabidRat88 You are once again wrong.
btw, do you say Heil Hitler when you return home to your wife and kids? I'm just curious.
criosray 1 year ago
@criosray And do you insert a sickle and hammer up your ass while singing The Internationale at the same time for nostalgia ?
RabidRat88 1 year ago
@RabidRat88 No, and I probably have even more reasons to hate communists than you considering how many people Stalin murdered.
criosray 1 year ago
prends ça Hitler !!
tarzan694 1 year ago
...nawt enuff dakka.
Phalanxification 1 year ago
Why do all these awesome vidoes last for just 7 seconds? Come on give me 50 minutes of katyusha firing.
Ortheos2006 1 year ago
the problem was never the leaders, it was always the people..with that i don't mean german people suck and are evil, ..i mean people, the common people are ignorant, we are in the core arrogant, greedy, politicians just take advantage of that fact.. do you think this is impossible to happen again? ..if politicians would want a war this would happen again, no problem, .. to get people to hate people, that is very easy, ..you just say, Russia is the problem you have no job..and war follows...
Sarasu23 1 year ago
Pas un seul n'a touché son but , même pas mal lol lol
TheCerberusInferno 1 year ago
excelent
bigtule 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Now that's what I call dakka!
Meshakhad 1 year ago
Now that's what I call dakka!
Meshakhad 1 year ago
HEIL STALIN!!!
SeXeHRD 1 year ago
holy crabs!
the12221 1 year ago
тотальный пиздец
fraxess 1 year ago
The sound itself is just blazing!
CosmoShidan 1 year ago 2
Needs more dakka.
thegreekweegee 1 year ago
I love this sound!!! Furious!!!
Hashishtani 2 years ago 3
Ah the sound of an eponymous swarm tactic, which ironically really does sound like a wasp swarm! I love it.
marmaladekamikaze 2 years ago 2
Christ. Thats some barrage.
ThatMan0verThere 2 years ago
needs more dakka.
DarkBahamut 2 years ago 3
Eat missles fascist scum!
wnxsilence 2 years ago 19
most epic comment i have read in days!
slickrickdarula 2 years ago
@wnxsilence the people who you are referring to are wrong. It was the people who suffred not the leaders. The leaders of nazi-germany where fascist and not the soldiers. keep that in mind ;)
edderd8 1 year ago
@edderd8 Soldiers were fascist too.
criosray 1 year ago
@criosray 30% voted for the nazis in 1933. That's all.
RabidRat88 1 year ago
So much for your triumph of the will, Hitler...
Patrissimo47 2 years ago 4
Pretty.
DrTimeCop 2 years ago
If it was a BM-31-12 it was 12 300 MM warheads hitting in a smallish area in a short period of time.
volirrik, rocket ammunition is actually cheaper than traditional artillery. It's the guidance systems that run the prices up so high on modern rocket munitions
coy0te9 2 years ago
noisecore :3
SonSukka 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NEBELWERFER 150mm is better!
astrolopitequs23 2 years ago
that rockets destroyed the germans.
termoso 2 years ago 13
T-34 was destroyed germans
RepublikaSrpska1989 2 years ago 4
@termoso Useless weappon: unprecise, weak, expensive. The Chinese were able (or would have been at least, but judged it senseless) to build such a weappon 1000 years ago. Soviets just won because of masses and masses of ressources which overwhelmed German quality. That was all. Soviets are the greatest mass murderers of the human history - even against their own people. It's a shame to search for glory in this scum bastard red army. Not only a shame, but it is brain-sick!
zentralwerkstatt 1 year ago
Comment removed
criosray 1 year ago
@zentralwerkstatt Useless? Say that to the nazis that were shitting their pants the moment they heard it. Maybe chinese had it invented 1000 years ago as you claim yet the Soviets were the ones with unmatched artillery firepower during WW2.
Soviets also had best tanks during 2nd part of the War, fyi.
They won not because of resources (or rather not only because of resources) but because of the sheer unbreakable willpower of people and due to the genius war tacticians like Marshal Zhukov.
criosray 1 year ago
@criosray it sounds really that you're a fan of the communists. But anyway the T-34 was a very good start in improving tanks. But the Königstiger was way better then the russian tanks. you've also to know that the Russians could make for example. 200 T-34's en the Germans produced like 10 Königstigers. A german wanted a perfect tank. good painting and the final touch. The russians didn't. if the tank was ugly so what for them. so lets say its first the time that was missing by the germans.
edderd8 1 year ago
@edderd8 Sounds more like you are a communist hater. Let's get the facts straight: T-34 was superior to Königstiger or any other tank at those days. It was more mobile, more durable and one of the most important things - it was cheaper to mass produce it.
Here are some clues for you about Tiger II: "the tests revealed the tanks to be severely defective; the transmission and suspension broke down very frequently and the engine was prone to overheating and consequential failure.
criosray 1 year ago
@edderd8 Additionally, the Soviets opinion was of deficiencies in the armor after firing many anti-tank rounds at the same target. Not only did they report that the metal was of shoddy quality (a problem not particular to the Tiger II—as the war progressed, the Germans found it harder and harder to obtain the alloys needed for high-quality steel), but the welding was also, despite "careful workmanship", extremely poor.
criosray 1 year ago
@criosray The photos of post-action destroyed Tiger IIs tell a different story.
Not a single shot penetrates the front of the tank. There are also photos from 1944/45 where you see Panthers with twenty impacts deflected at the front. You are talking out of your ass as usual with no basis in facts. But that is hardly surprising from a commie-lover.
RabidRat88 1 year ago
@edderd8 Additionally about T-34:
“We had nothing comparable.” —Friedrich von Mellenthin (Panzer Battles)
"One of the first known encounters with a T-34 was by the 17th Panzer Division which was spotted by the Dniepr River, it crushed a 37mm anti-tank gun, blew up two Panzer IIs and went on to leave nine more miles of destruction before being destroyed at close range by a howitzer."
criosray 1 year ago
@criosray Any more well known anecdotes about the T-34 you want to bore us with ? No one denies the T-34 was a better design than the german tanks in 1941. When they caught up, they demonstrated their engineering skills with the Panther in 1943, which was far superior to any T-34. Of course, by then it was far too late to change anything.
RabidRat88 1 year ago
@RabidRat88 Panther was never superior to T-34, equal technically, inferior in the mean of higher production cost and problems with reliability.
T-34 improved over the years of war. 1941 T-34/76 (which Panther was 'copied' from) and T-34/85 (1944) are very different tanks, although they share the same hull pretty much.
Panther V had a wee bit better armor and better vision but also had a smaller gun, was larger and heavier which also meant that it wasn't as fast and agile on the battlefield.
criosray 1 year ago
@edderd8 "During the winter of 1941–42 the T-34 again dominated German tanks through its ability to move over deep mud or snow without bogging down; German tanks could not move over terrain the T-34 could handle."
"The German infantry, at that time armed mostly with PaK 36 37 mm (1.46 in) antitank gun, had no effective means of stopping T-34s"
criosray 1 year ago
@criosray yea maybe but I guess the war was from 1939-1945 not only the winter of 1941-1942. and Btw then was the battle of Stalingrad if i'm right. and normally could Paulus save the sixt army. but the responsable for the Luftwaffe promised Hitler he could supplie the german troups. but caused by the bad weather where the germans trapped. and Hitler was a stubard guy so. yea well u know it i guess. anyway after that winter the number of material killed the war not the ood quality of the sovjets
edderd8 1 year ago
@edderd8 War was 1939 to 1945 actually. It's just that since Stalingrad the outcome was pretty much obvious. The whole idea of Blitzkrieg was to conquer (or at least break the spine of Red Army and take Moscow) Soviet Union within first months, preferably before the winter (yes, Hitler knew what kind of winters Russia had). And during the first weeks-months they were extremely successful, capturing hundreds of thousands but then nazis were slowed down so much that war turned into a slow grind.
criosray 1 year ago
@edderd8 Resources of course played a large part but by far not the greatest. If the Blitzkrieg hadn't failed the limited resources wouldn't matter.
My grandfather and grandmother fought in this war from the very begin (for Soviet) and till the very end so I know first hand what kind of sacrifices people had to make to achieve this victory.
criosray 1 year ago
@criosray well you can pretend it in an other way. its a tactic so you get familiar with it. the Blitzkrieg was very effective. but the shortage of resources and the inpossibility of the wheater and the hard resistance made a blitzkrieg impossible. the Germans hadn't the ability to use resources for cheap. their soldiers where very important and at the end the soldiers where rekruuts what the hell they did know about how they had to fight. Soldiers with an age of 18-25 barely know what it is .
edderd8 1 year ago
@edderd8 Blitzkrieg was effective until it failed. There was no shortage of resources for Blitzkrieg. And more than that - the nazi had a far better army in all means for the Blitzkrieg. In June 1941 German army had around 3 million (including 200,000 from its allies), this included 142 infantry divisions, 17 panzer divisions and 4,000 tanks. The whole Axis deployed more than 5 millions against Soviet Russia while the Red Army had only about 2.9 millions on the western side.
criosray 1 year ago
@edderd8 and additionally to that the equipment of the Red Army was not anywhere as good as nazis as I mentioned before nor Soviet was trully prepared for this war due to how stern and stupid Stalin was hoping that Hitler won't break the Pact of Molotov-Ribbentrop...
criosray 1 year ago
@edderd8 yeah, and russians born with knowledge on how to fight? 18-25 eh? The Soviet mobilized every men from 16 y.o. in 1941, and during the actual war even the kids were fighting.
criosray 1 year ago
@criosray no but they weren't trained at all they just took a gun and shoot. and i don't say this without respect. i respect a lot what the russian did. But a German was learned how to fight, how to kill, how to fight the war. Russians weren't. at the end soldiers of the Hitlerjugend went to the war. they weren't ready to fight... and Anyway joining kids in the army isn't that good. I mean on the front. in an army to train yea cv but not to go on front.
edderd8 1 year ago
@edderd8 Ah, if you are saying that russians weren't trained as well. That's undeniable truth. In 1941 German army was much-much better trained. That was especially noticable in the skies where Luftwaffe was basically raping Soviet air forces (and not only because of the superior quality of the planes but mainly because of the high quality training and extensive experience of German pilots).
criosray 1 year ago
@edderd8 Besides in 30's Stalin butchered thousands of Red Army officers, including high command... If not Zhukov and war in Mongolia against Japan invasion in 39's the Barbarossa could probably succeed in 41-42 and the World that we know'd be very different today...
criosray 1 year ago
@edderd8 Kids and women on the front line of course is a very bad thing but probably not as bad as living and dying in the arbeitsdorfs...
criosray 1 year ago
@criosray yea well. but just don't think Hitler wanted to destroy the jews in the first years. their just wasn't enough room to place them so they taught about extermination. and if you vieuw in theirs understanding it would been better after the war to do that. But anyway its blown up the hole Holocaust. of course its a horrible thing. But w/e i don't deny it I just believe its made bigger then it in real was. well anyway both of these things are bad so both are wrong
edderd8 1 year ago
@edderd8 It was actually bigger as it wasn't only jews. My family lost 2 grandfather's sisters who were raped and murdered by nazis, and my grand-grand mother died of starvation in 1942. The civilian cities were bombed. The people were mass murdered or put to the extermination camps. About 1/3 of my country (Ukraine) population died during 1941-1945. That's more than 10 mil living souls. A lot of them were jews of course but only minority.
criosray 1 year ago
@criosray And now we know why you are so desperate to prove the russians were
superior... not just in numbers and production. Objectivity is not your strongpoint is it ?
RabidRat88 1 year ago
@criosray and also the germans went out of resources. while the Russians had a lot of them. another fact is. the germans were the best in their tacticals. Their allies however were a pain in the ass. they kapitulate easy. their weaponary wasn't that good. not enough trained. another thing is and for that look to documents. the russians fight good and finally won but that was cause if you are outnumbered by men u can get overwelmed you know. if the russians lose 2/3 if there men in a battle..
edderd8 1 year ago
@edderd8 Yes, but in the begin of the War the German's war machine was far superior to what any other country had at the time. Soviet started the war literaly was naked army. A lot of soldier didn't even have guns in the very begin and had to loot it from the fallen enemies or comrades. I'm not even talking about aviation and tanks... The only resource that Soviet had in plenty was human resource. But it was as good as a meat shield. In 44-45 of course Soviet was already far far stronger...
criosray 1 year ago
@edderd8 Men on the war are only good if they are properly equiped. Otherwise say China or India would conquer the World by now.
Soviet won because people fought desperately. Napoleon could tell you: don't mess with russians or you will regret.
criosray 1 year ago