Who would explain me how came that the poor Brittish people being so sacked with Roman taxation still had enough resources to rise a massive army of chariots? :-)
To say the truth, celtic nobles had some chariots (limos of their days), as many peoples used them before learning horseback riding. But there were few of them and they were completely worhthless in warfare for millenia by then.
@Grimrippa1 well 'even for him', Caesar wasn't actually a jenius military stratagist, but he was a very uniek politician and he could wrigth things in such a way that even if he lost a battle or something he could say it in a way as if he actualy won it. and most things we know about his battles came from written things wrritten by him, like the 'bellum gallorum'. and of course he wants to look good for the people of Rome.
@theerasmussoldier you could say the same about many other famous generals and heroes. Alexander, Napoleon, Nelson, etc. Facts are facts though. Caesar did beat Pompey, who named himself Magnus, in a civil war after having conquered all of Gaul. No mean feat as Gaul was warlike and territorially enormous. He made such an impression on the Germans that they used the title Kaesar for ages. Good politician he was but a unique strategist and tactician also for sure.
Reg: All right, but apart from the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?
Human nature has never changed and it never will there will always be war invading armys will always rape theive murder and get away with it the only thing thats changed over thousands of years is technology and laws YOU CANT CHANGE HUMAN NATURE ITS INSTINCT
Very interesting but this part with the fake horses is so self serving of the presenters. The Iceni didn´t have a 9 to 5, and each idividual concentrated on what they were special at from the day they could walk. Their patience broke and they stood up for themselves and were defeated. AVATAR rewiiiiiiiind. It´s a patern that repeats and repeats, throughout human civilization.
@markdangerman because when the roman rule at the time in ancient U.K they say there have some woman working is soldier an ever gladiator too that the only part of the ancient roman empire that have woman is a employed at the time that why woman in the U.K are bad ass you see XENA warrior princess right she from there too
Britain was like the end of the earth to the Romans, though he didnt conquer it when Julious Ceasar and the Romans first tried to land and colonise it, his reasons were simaler to the USA trying to put a man on the moon... they must've been very cold and theyd never seen waters as difficult to navigate as the cold unpredictable northern seas... a bit off topic, nevermind
@j3parrots USA? WTF! YOU clowns didn't mind crying like lopwlife babies when Germany was knocking on your door. Without us you would be speaking German today! Milions of us died to save your fagot asses. You idiot!
I dont think I was talking about ww2 or hitler or all the stuff you see on tv and movies. I ll say it again .. it, you still with me...would have been odd. Paranoid fk back to the fox news network with yer
News has nothing to do with it, especially since Fox News portrays Britain in a fine light. Please don't insult anyone, the British and the Americans are so alike, and are the ones who should be standing together for Western Civilization. What happened, happened. We are the result. Let's be civil, if we think we are so advanced. :)
Like the moon because its a land away from whats known and its totally alien therefore getting there shows how powerful you are fk it you probably dont believe in evolution why bother
PLEASE don't give people a reason to think worse of Americans than they already do. You are right in many ways, of course, but name calling won't help anyone. :)
lmao, come on you guys. The Roman Empire was the light, and Imperialism is just the correct way of thinking. All peoples united, all ideas shared. That's the main idea. To rebel against that is horribly selfish. People should rejoice at being a part of the whole, rather than fighting to 'maintain independence.'
After Rome fell, there were lots of 'independent' Dark Age warlords using common people to fight each other, weren't there?
Destructive and Deserved Revenge on this scale is Awesome. Of course, it would have been so much more climactic if somehow the Germanic tribes got in on the Celtic's Rebellion against Rome.
Actually most of modern culture has origanated from the Roman empire and the reason Every hates the UK is because you guys conquered everything you saw but i gotta give the British Empire in the 18h century there props t
you guys went completally off topic, the video its about boudiccas warriors, not the us or brittish current situation, that is very ignorant of all of you,....
We've all seen you guys hunt lol, you had to adopt other forms of warfare to keep up- Odds were actually in your favor in the American Revolution, you had an established Gov. with resources from other invested surrounding countries, and still , with a fleet, an army , and fully stocked, you lost , hows that economy going by the way lol
Actually, the odds were stacked against Britain: a warzone 5000 miles (6 weeks) away, with massive logistical problems was the biggest issue. The other problem which was decisive was that to have surpressed the rebellion, britain would have had to garrison every town - it just wasnt't worth it. On the other point, re. the economy, I think you'll find that (a) the US economy is as fucked as anyone's and (b) the world crisis started in the US. Obama has just pumped trillions of dollars,wake up
by the way America kicked your ass- remember, the whole American revolution, then they shelled out a few billion to rebuild your economy after Germany stuck a tank up your ass.
huh? everyone beat you guys, irish men with rocks beat you guys goodlord the only thing you do is write paper victory LMAO- tell me a war you won, ya just withdrew from some tribal men in the middle east in the 21st Century, you're "still" gettin your butt wooped
Oh dear. You tube attracts 90% idiots, and 10% intelligent people. You're not in the first catergory. The prob with people like you is that at about age 12 you stop reading, learning etc about history, which is a problem because you simply don't have the knowledge to debate. Britain for 100 years had the largest empire the world has EVER seen. This involved being successful in war. Heard of the Seven Years, Spanish succession, Napoleonic, Boer War, Crimean, Zulu War, WW1 and WW2, Falklands?
You're gettin a ego from enslavin Black Africans? lol they were being sold by African Kings, you didn't catch em lol, when was the last time you won in the Olympics lol, Slavery has been in Africa for thousands of years, all you did was brag about it...ooooOooo big deal, you were enslaved too, why ya gotta be so negative lol
I never enslaved anyone, nor did my family, and Im fully aware of the situation to do with buyers and sellers, but what has that got to do with anything? Man, keep to the topic will you, you seem to have a problem with focus, do you have ADD?
The rank thing, you serious? you elevated yourself up by what, sucking dry your own family lol- are you not paying any attention here the failure of your society resulted in a turn coat of every man for himself, - and you even have on you page a man with armor and a sheild with 3 lions- standing for england "THERES NO FUCKING LIONS IN ENGLAND MAN" does that give you a clue as to where that symbol came from???? Are you totally off your rocker??? denial for 500 years goodlord
Judas- when you get a pair large enough to stick up for your roots, hit me back up for a fight- you're just sad at this point, no matter how many Roman style buildings you build in your area, it's still a tribute to your Masters, damn man, next time- BE A MAN-
Do you understand that? Instead of actually holding on to your roots, you adopted new ones to claim as your own, and attempted to erase your heritage. You denied yourself, what's a name for that-Judas Iscariot- thats what you are- whats worse is you have no guilt about it. just sat there and defended an "image". that image is not you- whatever man, and then you stooped to calling someone a "SLAVE"? only I'm not from this area, I'm from the other side, you know, the one with a population of 4bill
Ever heard of Cassius Dio or Dio Cassius ? hehehehehe you know in the original story , it was 80,000 Britons that were killed "VS" the wikipedia version of some town sacking parade of warriors on a Capital City LMAOOO- omg it gets even more pathetic LMAO beyond pathetic even , I was already convinced of cowardness but even "that" was giving to much credit - you're even more Pathetic that I thought possible really -
included a "TALE" of her revolt from- story written about a RED HEADED Woman- Fletcher wrote a play in 1619- William Cowper is your Fairy tale poet man, then on to Margaret Thatcher - The whole video is FAIRY TALE LMAOOOOO LOSSSERRRR!!!!!!!!! LMAOOO
Chariot theory!! LMAOOOOOO hey guess what I think they had laser guns also- if the sculptor had put in a laser gun, you'd probably defend that too- "Historical Painter -John opie 1761 -Boadicea Haranguing The Britons guess what , NO CHARIOT! -Voudicea The Chronicles of England 1578 by Raphael Holinshed
Wow, thts so funny, sarcasm is funny...duhh. You are no higher than the rank of typical ignorant yank to me. I bet when your father looked at you, he wished he'd settled for a blowjob lol.
Start also on the -Bronze Age trade of Eurasia- around Turkey , the Trade starts around 3000 BC -University of Chicago announced there was a local source of tin in the Middle East that allowed bronze production to flourish- Turkey's Eurasian Trade is well known at that time - check out -Afro-Eurasian Bronze Age Economic Expansion and Contraction
Actually, its not that you guys are good at it, its just that you seem to do it more than anyone. It goes hand in hand with the arrogance to stand there and try to lecture others on their own history, but I guess its a habit from slavery you havent grown out of.
huh? lol ummm sorry guy, wrong area lol, I'm not from America, so you can't pull that slavery stuff on me- are you just mad you're history is a lie? All did was try and find the truth, "you" sat there and just defended a blunt lie, thats "REALLY" sad man, you've actully gone to a point where you don't hold your own ancestors in ANY regard- every person whose ever died for you or your people was forgotten, just to save face, you didn't fight back, you just attempted to erase your very heritage
Whats funny is you call it a lie when it is evident in archaeology and written accounts from the time...so, you're the one who look silly. You are a traitor to your own heritage, kissing Roman arse and denying what is blatanlt obvious from evidence in burials etc.
Gallo-Graeci is a French term, I found another possible-Goidels, Celtia all these terms are references from other nations and scholars, some grouping them all together under "CELT" Bronze would have been brought by P-Celt , so guess what- not looking good for those Chariot designs.
Stephen Oppenheimers groundbreaking genetic research has revealed that the Anglo-Saxon invasion contributed only a tiny fraction to the English gene pool- means it was no invasion- it was Migration, there is no "anglo" saxon - his Genetic research goes with Archaeological Data of the Tumulus culture - The end of the Younger Dryas has been dated to about 9640 BCE so one was there before 10,000 years (Ice age) Q-Celt must have come in around that time
Yes we know, modern Brits are descended primarily from the indigenous stock, again, your point? Stick to the topic please. 10000 years ago were not any Celts, but proto Indo-Europeans.
Here its says Brythons or welsh also known as P-Celts from the area of southwestern Germany; possible Urnfield culture - They divided P-Celt and Q-Celt , Edward Lhuyd is said to have phrased the word "CELT" if they divided it by such both using the same name , it was for catagorization purposes, means the orginal tribe name is not known, unless you dig up some Roman journals of Gaulic conquest
The very fact you say 'Gaulic' instead of Gallic tells me immediately you have no idea who or what you are talking about. Celts do come from the Urnfield cultures, what is your point?
I didn't say Rome created the world, it's not really that old compared to some, and I didn't say Celts were some brute evil demonize people, they just didn't have "Chariots" lol find a native Celt home and put a Chariot beside it and tell me if that looks correct to you simply by common sense - what was Celt Bronze Age
Nevermind lol - you're not into this , seen the burials?- nevermind I'll study it myself, remain an idiot for all I care- goodluck with your "Chariot theory" lol -
Oh, should I do the study for you? You're the one going against common and well known fact, you prove it. As for me, I am more than comfortable in the knowledge that I am right.
Elite elements of Charioteers? ok so you just said they stopped using Chariots and switch to Cavalry, Cavalry wasn't until the middle ages, Chariots are in Egypt and Persia (Lower East Africa and Middle east) you slipped a few thousand years guy. So now you admit they did not have Chariots at this Battle, so why don't you admit, that if they did, the Chariot design would have come from Egypt Persian Area- who by which Persia went into areas of greece that eventually became Rome
No, cavalry was used earlier than that, you must be getting senile or something. It doesnt matter where a design came from, the debate here is whether they used them or not, keep to the topic please.
Pretty amazing how some British teach other peoples history, and manufacture their own- theres no "Anglo" Saxon history, they took a small portion of history and blew it up, some nobles using it to separate Norman Noble from Saxon Common citizen.
Of course they did something, their language and much of their culture mixed with the romano-british to shape the whole high middle ages way of life, things would be very different today in England if it werent for the Germanic peoples. It would even be called England, it'd still be East Britannia or something.
by the way, neither of these "Roman actors" look Italian- Al Pacino looks ITALIAN, neither of these guys look anything close to a native Italian, you want to see Native Italians- type in- "No reservations greece"- it has a small sample of ethnography there in video.
I will continue to look for more- you should do the same if you're so "BRITISH"
You don't know which language was spoken where ya dork, you don't even know the original name or saying of "Welsh" which could have been Velch or Velh with a silent S- I don't have biased opinion, dude they didn't build Chariots man- gotta be kidding me, lets see, common sense could tell me that one- the vid shows Chariots in this scene only, at the battle scene they vanish, if these people had a fleet of Chariots against the Roman regiment, guess what, they would have won.
The British army at the time of the invasion was one of transition. Celts on the continent had stopped using chariots in war, in favour of cavalry, but the British army still had elite elements of Charioteers. Sometime they could even be used as a means to transport warriors to the front lines.
I didn't say Celts were idiots, they just didn't have Chariots, and you're grouping all clans into one Celt group- there were separate names for each- the Celt you probably like, has nothing to do with the Saxon you're mistaking it for. or the Norman or any of the rest- Southern Ireland would probably be one of the only places that took on the preasure of invasion and still do, from Brits claiming Saxon to Roman Heritage
AdelaideOrderKnights The only Celt Heritage to ever close to surviving are districts in South Ireland- there would be there more an original line of Celt, probably in the older community who can still speak a little Gaelic-
You're English background arent you? I can tell...thats why you have no idea. There are a lot of Welsh who would be horrified by such an ignorant statement. We dont need Sassenachs telling us we dont exist anymore.
well at least you admitted you can't use a Chariot in a forested area- now admit that Celts didn't pass the designs to build a Chariot through oral teachings and camp fire story.
celtic culture made it to Britain, and with it came the craftsmanship. How else could things have transferred? And just for your info, not all British were illiterate, Druids and other nobles wrote in Greek letters.
ok how about we start at the beginning, what was the Welsh original name because I just traced the origin of the letter "W" - it's not that old, orginally the Welsh probably would have been said as
Oh please, what has the letter W got to do with anything? We know it is a Germanic sound. Actually, you can combine sounds like mh in gaelic to receive the same sound, as Im sure one could in Welsh too. Anyway, Britons are not Gaels, dont you understand that?
well lets see, Celts did not have paper, Paper was brought to the west by Asia, Rome before as Greeks were invaded by Persians who had this tech. It takes quite a bit to create a Chariot from scratch, it is not an easy task with out a large variety of tools. This vid is false. it would take a small City at that time to create that many Chariots- and do you even know what a native Celt or Pict home looks like, it was thatched rounded hay - so parked outside was carved Chariot with rod iron rims?
You sound to me like another one of those historians who believes too much what Romans say, and looks down on his own history. Dont give too much praise, the Britons were well civilised before Rome came along, archaeology proves this. Such a shame so many British over glamourize Romans and betray their own ancestors. Rome didnt do half as much as you think.
Unless she stole it , it was not a Brit Chariot- sorry - Romans made Chariots Persians, Egyptians, umm a brit in a thatch home and borrowed armor, sorry no- these guys have added an element for show
Celts used chariots in warfare on the continent, archaeology proves that. The British too used them, as they were Celticised and had close links. There are numerous accounts of this. Obviously you cant use a chariot in forest ambush, but there were plenty of open field battles. I dont think you know what you're talking about.
you can hardly run a decked out jeep 4x4 on unpaved ground without a good rocking at 25-30mph- a chariot? with no shocks? in a Forest? or on an unpaved road ? or leading an Assualt?
besides the forest- that country side is known for "rocks" games with rocks were devised from being so many rocks- should just call it Rockland
"you can hardly run a decked out jeep 4x4 on unpaved ground without a good rocking at 25-30mph- a chariot? with no shocks? in a Forest? or on an unpaved road ? or leading an Assualt?"
I'd love to see a Chariot fight in a forested area- anyone whos ridden in a Chariot knows when you pick up speed- you'd better hold on if you hit a bump- you WILL be flung- fighting with a sword in forested area on a Chariot - is a lie -
Chariots CAN NOT be used in warefare on bumpy ground- hardly even open ground- on a road as travel at a slow pace to carry a general yes- to lead an assault? never- to fight ? never -
Brits didn't have Chariots- Romans used Chariots in games who also used the brits - the whole gladiator thing ya know.
sorry but, unless she stole the chariot it wasn't hers- if it's written in History, it's onlyyour version, which goodlord everyone knows by now British have an actual "History" of lieing in History
Great so they attacked a helpless city? also that battle at 6L20 is a lie- and you by the way you can't run a Chariot in the forest
one bump and you'd be flying- this is why Romans use Chariots in sports only- a Chariot going 20mph will buck and tip with the slightest bump and the rider will be flung, it can only be used on flat ground
I've always been quite terrified by war chariots. No idea why though, i would have been on the right side of them :)
TalonMercenary 2 months ago
Who would explain me how came that the poor Brittish people being so sacked with Roman taxation still had enough resources to rise a massive army of chariots? :-)
To say the truth, celtic nobles had some chariots (limos of their days), as many peoples used them before learning horseback riding. But there were few of them and they were completely worhthless in warfare for millenia by then.
Artyom2012 9 months ago
@Artyom2012 they build them by using wood, plus they would of already had them before the romans attacked,
vwalah 8 months ago
@Artyom2012 when Caesar visited Britain, the Brits already had chariots... hundreds of them, which proved to be a pain in the neck even for him...
Grimrippa1 8 months ago
@Grimrippa1 well 'even for him', Caesar wasn't actually a jenius military stratagist, but he was a very uniek politician and he could wrigth things in such a way that even if he lost a battle or something he could say it in a way as if he actualy won it. and most things we know about his battles came from written things wrritten by him, like the 'bellum gallorum'. and of course he wants to look good for the people of Rome.
theerasmussoldier 3 months ago
@theerasmussoldier you could say the same about many other famous generals and heroes. Alexander, Napoleon, Nelson, etc. Facts are facts though. Caesar did beat Pompey, who named himself Magnus, in a civil war after having conquered all of Gaul. No mean feat as Gaul was warlike and territorially enormous. He made such an impression on the Germans that they used the title Kaesar for ages. Good politician he was but a unique strategist and tactician also for sure.
Grimrippa1 3 months ago
Weleaaaaase Wodewick!
gummihjerne 1 year ago
Reg: All right, but apart from the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?
Attendee: Brought peace?
Reg: Oh, peace - shut up!
chiby1000 1 year ago
the 9th got ambushed by the scottish up in scotland am almost sure off
evilscotsmin 1 year ago
@evilscotsmin Transferred to Holland I'm afraid. The Eagle of the Ninth is a good story, but only a story.
taff1976 1 year ago
Human nature has never changed and it never will there will always be war invading armys will always rape theive murder and get away with it the only thing thats changed over thousands of years is technology and laws YOU CANT CHANGE HUMAN NATURE ITS INSTINCT
EasytownGirl 1 year ago
Very interesting but this part with the fake horses is so self serving of the presenters. The Iceni didn´t have a 9 to 5, and each idividual concentrated on what they were special at from the day they could walk. Their patience broke and they stood up for themselves and were defeated. AVATAR rewiiiiiiiind. It´s a patern that repeats and repeats, throughout human civilization.
DrumAddict1974 1 year ago
am i seeing things ? or is that a woman dressed as a roman soldier at 5;24
markdangerman 1 year ago 6
@markdangerman because when the roman rule at the time in ancient U.K they say there have some woman working is soldier an ever gladiator too that the only part of the ancient roman empire that have woman is a employed at the time that why woman in the U.K are bad ass you see XENA warrior princess right she from there too
hateUhuman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@markdangerman "am i seeing things ? or is that a woman dressed as a roman soldier at 5;24"
I reckon you are right. It looks like a lass
oarfrost 9 months ago
Britain was like the end of the earth to the Romans, though he didnt conquer it when Julious Ceasar and the Romans first tried to land and colonise it, his reasons were simaler to the USA trying to put a man on the moon... they must've been very cold and theyd never seen waters as difficult to navigate as the cold unpredictable northern seas... a bit off topic, nevermind
j3parrots 2 years ago
@j3parrots USA? WTF! YOU clowns didn't mind crying like lopwlife babies when Germany was knocking on your door. Without us you would be speaking German today! Milions of us died to save your fagot asses. You idiot!
Dallouez 2 years ago
I dont think I was talking about ww2 or hitler or all the stuff you see on tv and movies. I ll say it again .. it, you still with me...would have been odd. Paranoid fk back to the fox news network with yer
j3parrots 2 years ago
News has nothing to do with it, especially since Fox News portrays Britain in a fine light. Please don't insult anyone, the British and the Americans are so alike, and are the ones who should be standing together for Western Civilization. What happened, happened. We are the result. Let's be civil, if we think we are so advanced. :)
masterfeatherpen 1 year ago
@masterfeatherpen indeed I cant remember what I typed here but you make a sound point.... we are apes sir condition to behave by advertising
j3parrots 1 year ago
Like the moon because its a land away from whats known and its totally alien therefore getting there shows how powerful you are fk it you probably dont believe in evolution why bother
j3parrots 2 years ago
PLEASE don't give people a reason to think worse of Americans than they already do. You are right in many ways, of course, but name calling won't help anyone. :)
masterfeatherpen 1 year ago
@Dallouez I can speak german In der dritten weld Walder gerodet werden
j3parrots 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Dallouez I can speak german In der dritten weld Walder gerodet werden
j3parrots 1 year ago
lmao, come on you guys. The Roman Empire was the light, and Imperialism is just the correct way of thinking. All peoples united, all ideas shared. That's the main idea. To rebel against that is horribly selfish. People should rejoice at being a part of the whole, rather than fighting to 'maintain independence.'
After Rome fell, there were lots of 'independent' Dark Age warlords using common people to fight each other, weren't there?
VinnyBloo 2 years ago 4
Sig heil.
Tessmage 2 years ago
Small correction to the video:
Only 2500 of the IX legion was present at the ambush. Nearly all of them were killed.
The other half of the legion was stationed elsewhere and so did not die with their comrades, as reported in this video.
Cheers
Octavius0 2 years ago 3
Yep, it would have been nice if these videos concentrated a little more on the details instead of the dramaticisations!
renuoz 2 years ago 3
violence breeds violence
8lsatyq 2 years ago
so which one came 1st?
snowboredsnj 2 years ago
Destructive and Deserved Revenge on this scale is Awesome. Of course, it would have been so much more climactic if somehow the Germanic tribes got in on the Celtic's Rebellion against Rome.
MonarchofHell 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
will teach the roman cunts not to fuck with Britain aye LMAO. You can see why UK hates EU and vice a versa
paulmanser 2 years ago
Actually most of modern culture has origanated from the Roman empire and the reason Every hates the UK is because you guys conquered everything you saw but i gotta give the British Empire in the 18h century there props t
Crazydunn99 2 years ago
Well EU doesnt hate Britain it dislaikes it..
Cause it is Americas Lackey instead of supporting fellow EU'as more
And idiots from the Romano-British unions come many many today British people
MarkSeptim 2 years ago
you guys went completally off topic, the video its about boudiccas warriors, not the us or brittish current situation, that is very ignorant of all of you,....
elguerreromuisca 2 years ago 23
Go write me a book or something - "Tribal" men took on Russia in Afgan-
you know the place you suck a foreign policy dick too- "TRIBAL" men just shut you out of the Mountain SWAT REGION in
the Middle east- You're all show man - All talk and all show -
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Hahaha...what the fuck are you babbling on about now? Actually, I have just finished writing my second book.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
We've all seen you guys hunt lol, you had to adopt other forms of warfare to keep up- Odds were actually in your favor in the American Revolution, you had an established Gov. with resources from other invested surrounding countries, and still , with a fleet, an army , and fully stocked, you lost , hows that economy going by the way lol
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Like I said, the French, Dutch, Natives and Slaves, otherwise you'd still have an ugly union jack in your flag too lol.
Hows urs in the US? lol, you dickhead, they're all in the shit, so is that supposed to be funny?
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Actually, the odds were stacked against Britain: a warzone 5000 miles (6 weeks) away, with massive logistical problems was the biggest issue. The other problem which was decisive was that to have surpressed the rebellion, britain would have had to garrison every town - it just wasnt't worth it. On the other point, re. the economy, I think you'll find that (a) the US economy is as fucked as anyone's and (b) the world crisis started in the US. Obama has just pumped trillions of dollars,wake up
219970 2 years ago
by the way America kicked your ass- remember, the whole American revolution, then they shelled out a few billion to rebuild your economy after Germany stuck a tank up your ass.
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Umm...no America, with the help of the French, Dutch, Black slaves and Native Americans kicked Englands arse...you'd have been fucked otherwise.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
huh? everyone beat you guys, irish men with rocks beat you guys goodlord the only thing you do is write paper victory LMAO- tell me a war you won, ya just withdrew from some tribal men in the middle east in the 21st Century, you're "still" gettin your butt wooped
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Who exactly are we talking about? Where do you think Im from?
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Oh dear. You tube attracts 90% idiots, and 10% intelligent people. You're not in the first catergory. The prob with people like you is that at about age 12 you stop reading, learning etc about history, which is a problem because you simply don't have the knowledge to debate. Britain for 100 years had the largest empire the world has EVER seen. This involved being successful in war. Heard of the Seven Years, Spanish succession, Napoleonic, Boer War, Crimean, Zulu War, WW1 and WW2, Falklands?
219970 2 years ago
debates over- and you ruined the ending - go away butthead, go try on some over weight armor
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Go and lick the walls or whatever retards like you do in their spare time lol
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
You're gettin a ego from enslavin Black Africans? lol they were being sold by African Kings, you didn't catch em lol, when was the last time you won in the Olympics lol, Slavery has been in Africa for thousands of years, all you did was brag about it...ooooOooo big deal, you were enslaved too, why ya gotta be so negative lol
Britanglish13 3 years ago
I never enslaved anyone, nor did my family, and Im fully aware of the situation to do with buyers and sellers, but what has that got to do with anything? Man, keep to the topic will you, you seem to have a problem with focus, do you have ADD?
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Comment removed
Britanglish13 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The rank thing, you serious? you elevated yourself up by what, sucking dry your own family lol- are you not paying any attention here the failure of your society resulted in a turn coat of every man for himself, - and you even have on you page a man with armor and a sheild with 3 lions- standing for england "THERES NO FUCKING LIONS IN ENGLAND MAN" does that give you a clue as to where that symbol came from???? Are you totally off your rocker??? denial for 500 years goodlord
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Comment removed
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Judas- when you get a pair large enough to stick up for your roots, hit me back up for a fight- you're just sad at this point, no matter how many Roman style buildings you build in your area, it's still a tribute to your Masters, damn man, next time- BE A MAN-
Britanglish13 3 years ago
What the fuck are you talking about? You are senile old man.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Do you understand that? Instead of actually holding on to your roots, you adopted new ones to claim as your own, and attempted to erase your heritage. You denied yourself, what's a name for that-Judas Iscariot- thats what you are- whats worse is you have no guilt about it. just sat there and defended an "image". that image is not you- whatever man, and then you stooped to calling someone a "SLAVE"? only I'm not from this area, I'm from the other side, you know, the one with a population of 4bill
Britanglish13 3 years ago
wow, actually I kinda feel bad now, nevemind, go ahead keep your chariot theory. later dude- goodluck
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Really? I just feely pity...goodluck to you too :-)
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ever heard of Cassius Dio or Dio Cassius ? hehehehehe you know in the original story , it was 80,000 Britons that were killed "VS" the wikipedia version of some town sacking parade of warriors on a Capital City LMAOOO- omg it gets even more pathetic LMAO beyond pathetic even , I was already convinced of cowardness but even "that" was giving to much credit - you're even more Pathetic that I thought possible really -
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Comment removed
Britanglish13 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Boadicea in Holinshed's Chronicles 1577
included a "TALE" of her revolt from- story written about a RED HEADED Woman- Fletcher wrote a play in 1619- William Cowper is your Fairy tale poet man, then on to Margaret Thatcher - The whole video is FAIRY TALE LMAOOOOO LOSSSERRRR!!!!!!!!! LMAOOO
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Comment removed
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Chariot theory!! LMAOOOOOO hey guess what I think they had laser guns also- if the sculptor had put in a laser gun, you'd probably defend that too- "Historical Painter -John opie 1761 -Boadicea Haranguing The Britons guess what , NO CHARIOT! -Voudicea The Chronicles of England 1578 by Raphael Holinshed
- guess what...NOOOO CHARIOT B!TCH
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Wow, thts so funny, sarcasm is funny...duhh. You are no higher than the rank of typical ignorant yank to me. I bet when your father looked at you, he wished he'd settled for a blowjob lol.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Start also on the -Bronze Age trade of Eurasia- around Turkey , the Trade starts around 3000 BC -University of Chicago announced there was a local source of tin in the Middle East that allowed bronze production to flourish- Turkey's Eurasian Trade is well known at that time - check out -Afro-Eurasian Bronze Age Economic Expansion and Contraction
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Turkey?...wtf...you seem to have trouble sticking to the point lol.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
AdelaideOrderKnights anything else dude? LMAOOOOOO fuckin Brit liar LMAO , moral of the story is, "NEVER" - "EVER" trust a "BRITISH" Historian LMAOOO
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Coming from an American, I wont even rate that comment, because we all know what good liars you lot can be :-).
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Actually, its not that you guys are good at it, its just that you seem to do it more than anyone. It goes hand in hand with the arrogance to stand there and try to lecture others on their own history, but I guess its a habit from slavery you havent grown out of.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
huh? lol ummm sorry guy, wrong area lol, I'm not from America, so you can't pull that slavery stuff on me- are you just mad you're history is a lie? All did was try and find the truth, "you" sat there and just defended a blunt lie, thats "REALLY" sad man, you've actully gone to a point where you don't hold your own ancestors in ANY regard- every person whose ever died for you or your people was forgotten, just to save face, you didn't fight back, you just attempted to erase your very heritage
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Whats funny is you call it a lie when it is evident in archaeology and written accounts from the time...so, you're the one who look silly. You are a traitor to your own heritage, kissing Roman arse and denying what is blatanlt obvious from evidence in burials etc.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Gallo-Graeci is a French term, I found another possible-Goidels, Celtia all these terms are references from other nations and scholars, some grouping them all together under "CELT" Bronze would have been brought by P-Celt , so guess what- not looking good for those Chariot designs.
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Goidels is another way of saying Gaels. Havent you heard of the Celtic language family? We're not talking genetics here, but a cultural identity.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Stephen Oppenheimers groundbreaking genetic research has revealed that the Anglo-Saxon invasion contributed only a tiny fraction to the English gene pool- means it was no invasion- it was Migration, there is no "anglo" saxon - his Genetic research goes with Archaeological Data of the Tumulus culture - The end of the Younger Dryas has been dated to about 9640 BCE so one was there before 10,000 years (Ice age) Q-Celt must have come in around that time
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Yes we know, modern Brits are descended primarily from the indigenous stock, again, your point? Stick to the topic please. 10000 years ago were not any Celts, but proto Indo-Europeans.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Comment removed
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Here its says Brythons or welsh also known as P-Celts from the area of southwestern Germany; possible Urnfield culture - They divided P-Celt and Q-Celt , Edward Lhuyd is said to have phrased the word "CELT" if they divided it by such both using the same name , it was for catagorization purposes, means the orginal tribe name is not known, unless you dig up some Roman journals of Gaulic conquest
Britanglish13 3 years ago
The very fact you say 'Gaulic' instead of Gallic tells me immediately you have no idea who or what you are talking about. Celts do come from the Urnfield cultures, what is your point?
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
I didn't say Rome created the world, it's not really that old compared to some, and I didn't say Celts were some brute evil demonize people, they just didn't have "Chariots" lol find a native Celt home and put a Chariot beside it and tell me if that looks correct to you simply by common sense - what was Celt Bronze Age
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Celts used chariots...the archaeological evidence is overwhelming, havent you seen the burials etc?
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Nevermind lol - you're not into this , seen the burials?- nevermind I'll study it myself, remain an idiot for all I care- goodluck with your "Chariot theory" lol -
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Oh, should I do the study for you? You're the one going against common and well known fact, you prove it. As for me, I am more than comfortable in the knowledge that I am right.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
LOL...you are denying the burials now?
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Bow out while you still have shred of respect. Fancy that, an American telling me about my heritage lol.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Boadicea Haranguing the Britons by Samuel Wale, after John Hall
etching, late 18th century- Ever heard of Cassius Dio or Dio Cassius ? hehehehehe
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Elite elements of Charioteers? ok so you just said they stopped using Chariots and switch to Cavalry, Cavalry wasn't until the middle ages, Chariots are in Egypt and Persia (Lower East Africa and Middle east) you slipped a few thousand years guy. So now you admit they did not have Chariots at this Battle, so why don't you admit, that if they did, the Chariot design would have come from Egypt Persian Area- who by which Persia went into areas of greece that eventually became Rome
Britanglish13 3 years ago
No, cavalry was used earlier than that, you must be getting senile or something. It doesnt matter where a design came from, the debate here is whether they used them or not, keep to the topic please.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Pretty amazing how some British teach other peoples history, and manufacture their own- theres no "Anglo" Saxon history, they took a small portion of history and blew it up, some nobles using it to separate Norman Noble from Saxon Common citizen.
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Of course they did something, their language and much of their culture mixed with the romano-british to shape the whole high middle ages way of life, things would be very different today in England if it werent for the Germanic peoples. It would even be called England, it'd still be East Britannia or something.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
by the way, neither of these "Roman actors" look Italian- Al Pacino looks ITALIAN, neither of these guys look anything close to a native Italian, you want to see Native Italians- type in- "No reservations greece"- it has a small sample of ethnography there in video.
I will continue to look for more- you should do the same if you're so "BRITISH"
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Im not anything, I just refuse to kiss Roman arse and ignore my true ancestors. Romans did not civilise the world, that is the greatest myth of all.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You don't know which language was spoken where ya dork, you don't even know the original name or saying of "Welsh" which could have been Velch or Velh with a silent S- I don't have biased opinion, dude they didn't build Chariots man- gotta be kidding me, lets see, common sense could tell me that one- the vid shows Chariots in this scene only, at the battle scene they vanish, if these people had a fleet of Chariots against the Roman regiment, guess what, they would have won.
Britanglish13 3 years ago
(Part 6/6) man...take a good look buddy..guess what ...."1" Chariot
Britanglish13 3 years ago
The British army at the time of the invasion was one of transition. Celts on the continent had stopped using chariots in war, in favour of cavalry, but the British army still had elite elements of Charioteers. Sometime they could even be used as a means to transport warriors to the front lines.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
This vid is flawed, a bunch of percentage truth - facts mixed with ideals made to entertain sorry guy, this is NOT your history
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Excuse me, I know who my ancestors are better than you.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Comment removed
Britanglish13 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I didn't say Celts were idiots, they just didn't have Chariots, and you're grouping all clans into one Celt group- there were separate names for each- the Celt you probably like, has nothing to do with the Saxon you're mistaking it for. or the Norman or any of the rest- Southern Ireland would probably be one of the only places that took on the preasure of invasion and still do, from Brits claiming Saxon to Roman Heritage
Britanglish13 3 years ago
AdelaideOrderKnights The only Celt Heritage to ever close to surviving are districts in South Ireland- there would be there more an original line of Celt, probably in the older community who can still speak a little Gaelic-
Britanglish13 3 years ago
You're English background arent you? I can tell...thats why you have no idea. There are a lot of Welsh who would be horrified by such an ignorant statement. We dont need Sassenachs telling us we dont exist anymore.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AdelaideOrderKnights moral of the story is, NEVER- trust a British Historian
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Comment removed
Britanglish13 3 years ago
well at least you admitted you can't use a Chariot in a forested area- now admit that Celts didn't pass the designs to build a Chariot through oral teachings and camp fire story.
Britanglish13 3 years ago
celtic culture made it to Britain, and with it came the craftsmanship. How else could things have transferred? And just for your info, not all British were illiterate, Druids and other nobles wrote in Greek letters.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Admit you have a very low biased opinion of native culture.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
ok how about we start at the beginning, what was the Welsh original name because I just traced the origin of the letter "W" - it's not that old, orginally the Welsh probably would have been said as
VELCH
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Oh please, what has the letter W got to do with anything? We know it is a Germanic sound. Actually, you can combine sounds like mh in gaelic to receive the same sound, as Im sure one could in Welsh too. Anyway, Britons are not Gaels, dont you understand that?
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
It would not surprise me if this whole battle rebellion was manufactured.
Britanglish13 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
well lets see, Celts did not have paper, Paper was brought to the west by Asia, Rome before as Greeks were invaded by Persians who had this tech. It takes quite a bit to create a Chariot from scratch, it is not an easy task with out a large variety of tools. This vid is false. it would take a small City at that time to create that many Chariots- and do you even know what a native Celt or Pict home looks like, it was thatched rounded hay - so parked outside was carved Chariot with rod iron rims?
Britanglish13 3 years ago
no other version has Brits riding on rocky English land on Chariots
Britanglish13 3 years ago
You sound to me like another one of those historians who believes too much what Romans say, and looks down on his own history. Dont give too much praise, the Britons were well civilised before Rome came along, archaeology proves this. Such a shame so many British over glamourize Romans and betray their own ancestors. Rome didnt do half as much as you think.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Comment removed
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Comment removed
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Whats funny is, Gaelic is the actual English Language, What I'm typeing right now are Greek letters- with Austronesian Vowel Sounds
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Err, no Brythonic language is different from Gaelic. Cant you tell the difference between Welsh and Cornish and Gaelic?
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Gaelic is the language of Ireland and parts of Scotland, never was it really spoken in southern Britain.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Unless she stole it , it was not a Brit Chariot- sorry - Romans made Chariots Persians, Egyptians, umm a brit in a thatch home and borrowed armor, sorry no- these guys have added an element for show
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Celts used chariots in warfare on the continent, archaeology proves that. The British too used them, as they were Celticised and had close links. There are numerous accounts of this. Obviously you cant use a chariot in forest ambush, but there were plenty of open field battles. I dont think you know what you're talking about.
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Comment removed
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Ohhhhhhhhhh toasty. Burnt temple...nice.
kierenxxxx 3 years ago
Greeks and Romans abandoned the use of the war chariots many centuries before, because they were ineffective.
Cirifischio88 3 years ago 3
Their terrain was too rocky and hilly, and their horses big enough to ride.
Tareltonlives 3 years ago
btw nice animated Chariot scene i the forest
Britanglish13 3 years ago
you can hardly run a decked out jeep 4x4 on unpaved ground without a good rocking at 25-30mph- a chariot? with no shocks? in a Forest? or on an unpaved road ? or leading an Assualt?
besides the forest- that country side is known for "rocks" games with rocks were devised from being so many rocks- should just call it Rockland
Britanglish13 3 years ago
"you can hardly run a decked out jeep 4x4 on unpaved ground without a good rocking at 25-30mph- a chariot? with no shocks? in a Forest? or on an unpaved road ? or leading an Assualt?"
warriors were no pussies back in these days...
truthspeaker969 3 years ago 3
I'd love to see a Chariot fight in a forested area- anyone whos ridden in a Chariot knows when you pick up speed- you'd better hold on if you hit a bump- you WILL be flung- fighting with a sword in forested area on a Chariot - is a lie -
Chariots CAN NOT be used in warefare on bumpy ground- hardly even open ground- on a road as travel at a slow pace to carry a general yes- to lead an assault? never- to fight ? never -
it can't be done
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Interesting, the history books say otherwise. Are you an expert on Chariots or Horsemanship?
AdelaideOrderKnights 3 years ago
Brits didn't have Chariots- Romans used Chariots in games who also used the brits - the whole gladiator thing ya know.
sorry but, unless she stole the chariot it wasn't hers- if it's written in History, it's onlyyour version, which goodlord everyone knows by now British have an actual "History" of lieing in History
Britanglish13 3 years ago
Great so they attacked a helpless city? also that battle at 6L20 is a lie- and you by the way you can't run a Chariot in the forest
one bump and you'd be flying- this is why Romans use Chariots in sports only- a Chariot going 20mph will buck and tip with the slightest bump and the rider will be flung, it can only be used on flat ground
Britanglish13 3 years ago 2