Unlimited energy sources are out there!But the powerfull Oil business won't alow common ppl to know this,Find this technology at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the revolution!
@Desertphile - BACKING YOU 100% !!!! I got an idea, lets put up a prize, a big prize, for someone, anyone that can find this holygrail!!! - I think it's a safe bet.
Belive it or not Free energy is real,But the Oil companies want these technologies unknown to the masses,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Big change is comming soon!
@Desertphile hay check this... ..i was polite ....i agree with alot you said...so i dont want to get off on the wrong foot ,,,but dont call me names/idiot..be mature,
p.s. i should have put a questionmark after simple generater...that would have been more apropreate...so lets move past name calling and maybee now that you know it was a question you can reply properly...im quessing thats basicly a hydroelectric damn is...
@valveman12 Thank you. Now and then I wish that the believers in "free energy" would at the very least look at the history of "free energy" attempts, or just take a remedial physics class.
I couldn't agree with you more. I do believe that we can work to make things run more efficienty. Having spent 12years studying Science and Engineering, it's hilarious how many think that education is a conspiracy to hide the truth. I'm all for someone trying some of these things out to learn how things work in out Natural World, but most just take it on blind faith. Keep the videos coming.
First time I've seen you. Why the snotty attitude? Why not just present your argument on its own merits? Does demeaning others give you that much of a thrill? geez.
DesertPhile! Wow, we finally agree on something. All these perpetual motion con artists are a real blast from the past, too funny.
However, it's odd how you cannot see that increasing information from a single cell and advancing in complexity to arrive at all life on earth isn't exactly the same as perpetual motion. Darwin's "mechanism" of natural selection is just like the motors, just a wishful illusion. But people will tinker with these ideas endlessly.
"How are you defining "information" in biology..."
Same way biologist do. There are genetic instructions required to make a heart, lung or an eye for example. For these instructions to exist information is required. For something more complex to evolve more information must be added.
I dont see there is any evidence to support the idea that any life on earth is advancing in complexity and in fact everything we observe confirms the opposite. Life is declining not evolving.
Ok then how did cell mitosis evolve? Since you would need cell mitosiss for anything replicate, and therefore evolve, at all? And cell mitosis is highly complex in the extreme. Explain that evolutionary process to me.
And if that extreme amount of complexity can exist without evolution then why do we need evolution to explain life at all?
Are you suggesting life evolved from prokaryotes? If not you now have an even larger problem. Not just cells but prokaryotes too have this paradox. They have a complex means of replication that needed to exist for it to exist in the first place.
Desertphile, are you going to tell me that God did it? I mean how did that first cell arrive, reproduce and advance in complexity to become a Desertphile?
"Ok then how did cell mitosis evolve? Since you would need cell mitosiss for anything replicate,"
Why do you assume you would need mitosis? Just because that's a system you see now, don't assume it always was the system. Actually plenty of chemicals replicate far below the level of mitosis. Never assume.
I am not preaching to the choir. You assumed mitosis was needed for reproduction. This was a false assumption. Go back through your assertions, remove any assumptions, and you will get closer to the truth. Good luck
"It would be, if the faster deer were caught as often as the slower ones."
That doesn't "increase" information. On the contrary that eliminates information, in this case the slow deer wont be passing on that DNA. That is loss of information, perhaps beneficial loss, but loss nonetheless. We constantly use genetic loss to create different breeds of dogs. For example we can breed a wolf into a poodle but the never the poodle back into a wolf. That's due to genetic loss.
"For example we can breed a wolf into a poodle but the never the poodle back into a wolf."
no, you probable could breed a poodle back into a wolf(think atavisms), but by the time that happen the new wolf and the descendants of the present wolf would be separate species.
The DNA sequences don't bear out your ideas. Can you explain the ERVs we have in our DNA in the same locations as chimps do?
We share ERVs markers with cats too can you explain that?
The reason we share the EVRs with chimps is because humans in the past and even today eat chimps. Raw primate brains are really good stuff in some cultures. Thus humans and chimps are exposed the same viruses. Many of these EVRs favor regions and thus having matches is meaningless. The very reason that science is so promising is they believe its possible that they can hit the exact location ever time and do some very cool stuff.
mike thinks we're not talking about viruses as markers that have got themselves logged permanently in out genome by infecting a sex cell then breaking and failing to proceed in the normal viral route of killing the cell.
He thinks were talking about getting sick from the same virus. That's why he mentioned cats. LOL.
No I mentioned cats because of a scientific study on the subject I read a long time ago. And my mistake it's cats and baboons that share the markers. Still sinks your ship. If cats and baboons can share the markers does that mean they are of common decent???? Can't have it both ways.
The study: "The discovery of endogenous retroviruses Robin A Weiss1
1Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, London W1T 4JF, UK"
We are actually relate to every living thing. We share a common ancestor with everything: cats, baboons, mushrooms, everything. We can tell how closely partly from how similar our ERV patterns are. So you saying that cats and baoons have common ancestors fits perfectly with the idea of common descent. Cheers.
"We are actually relate to every living thing...."
You better study a little more about EVRs. Even the study that discovered the matches didn't attempt to explain the matches via common decent. You also might need to go back to TOE 101.
No, apparently you need to study more. If you disagree with science, provide a reason and evidence, don't just make claims with no base. We are indeed related to every living thing, but it's not particularly ERVs that tell us this.
Please don't post without doing a little research first.
So far I'm the only one that posted a scientific study (that you clearly didn't understand). All you have is hot air saying that I disagree with science? Typical blind faith Darwinist.
gamma-retrovirus was isolated from the baboon. It was found to be closely related antigenically and by sequence homology to the endogenous RD114 virus in cats. Only certain species of the cat genus, have this endogenous genome related to the baboon ERV. In contrast, all species of baboons carry this virus so it was present in primates much longer. It seems evident that a HORIZONTAL [emphasis mine], infectious event occurred to transfer the virus from baboons to cats.
Since cats would be quite likely to scavenge and feed on baboon placentae, a possible exposure to the virus can be envisioned. The human placenta is also permissive to the expression of multiple families of human endogenous retrovirus (HERV) genomes. Indeed, it appears that the retroviral envelope glycoproteins of at least one of them (HERV-W and possibly ERV-3) may be involved in natural syncytium induction to form the syncytiotrophoblast.
THEY ARE BOTH SUSEPTABLE TO THE VIRUS. Different story.
You seem to be under the mistaken impression that were talking about merely having been infected by the same kind of flu or something. We're not talking about like a human catching a virus and a chimp catching a virus showing that the virus can infect both species.
Here's a text example gene. =uninfected
Here's a text exERVample gene. =infected
Here's a text exaERVmple gene. =infected in a different place means not common ancestor
"...It seems evident that a HORIZONTAL [emphasis mine], infectious event occurred..."
Yes, and my point was if this can happen with baboons and cats, then whole evrs = common decent argument goes out the window. Obviously there are other explanations that are being conveinantly ignored. I'm not surprised. Read Icons of Evolution by Dr. Jonathan Wells. The amount of fraud surrounding Darwinism couldnt just be a mistake.
"We share ERVs markers with cats too can you explain that? "
do we? Citation?
"The reason we share the EVRs with chimps is because humans in the past and even today eat chimps."
wrong. the imposition of a virus into a specific location of a chromosome of a sex cell is the only way the viruses get to BE in the same location. Otherwise you are begging for 98,000 infections to accidentally end up in the exact same place on both humans and chimps independently.
I admit I have an obsession on the subject. :-) I try not to look at the latest 'free energy' videos, but I find myself unable to resist. Otch, I need help.....
The US Scientists who invented the Nuclear Bomb, handed it over to the USSR. The Arms Race Began, all working Perpetual Motion Machines were halted. Tesla, Maxwell, some kid in a school yard, and a guy named Sutter, did achieve overunity. Industry did not always include assembly lines. Inventors are considered a potential risk to national security. Weapons grade elements in mass production supersede clean energy. Government is still fighting a half-life war to keep a stockpile for readiness.
Great comments, I like your breakdown of the information. Do you talk this way when you talk to you dogs? And when is the last time you played with your dolls hanging off the funky curtain? By the way do you have nay knives for sell?
You also said at the beginning that perpetual has been known impossible for hundreds of years. No, just about 100 now. The strongest nail in the coffin came in 1905 with the special theory of relativity, which unified the theory of energy conservation with the theories of mass conservation and momentum conservation. You even said it right twice at the end when you said "nearly one hundred years". Perhaps you should rehearse these things a little more? It doesn't have to be done in one take...
So like I was saying - if you used a magnetic field to impart a dremel's rotational momentum into a hard disk's r.m. even if it was by a weakly coupled magnetic field, that wouldn't necessarily cause it to be a massive amount of energy lost. Less energy will be transferred, but in turn there will be less of a load seen by the dremel you see. The same thing happens with a transformer with a low coupling coefficient. Even with a 1% coupling coefficient you can transfer energy with 99% efficiency.
no. Output Strength = 1/distance_from_generator^2. These are nonfocused electromagnetic fields, even with focused one will most likely never be able to reach 99%, that´s like reaching the lightspeed-barrier - the closer you get, the harder it will be to proceed
It has nothing to do with the inverse square law. As a matter of fact, magnetic fields decrease with the inverse CUBE of the distance, not the inverse square, since magnetic fields are always dipoles and never monopoles like electric or gravitational fields. It has nothing at ALL to do with light-speed, it is magnetic coupling of two rotating objects. If they were suspended in a vacuum, perhaps floating in orbit, you could get damn near 100% efficiency with barely any detectable coupling at all.
do you even know what you´re talking about? If the Denominator gets bigger (cubic > sqare), your resulting force will be EVEN SMALLER, thats simple math! Who said that the magnetic force has something to do with the speed of light? Nobody, that was a analogy! Monopoles still dont exist, even in electricity there is ALWAYS a positive and a negative charge, even with electrostatic induction you´ll only see dipoles, maybe the second pole will be under the surface of the object (like on a haircomb).
"Instead of just trying to insult me, if you spotted anything I said in this video that is wrong, by all means please do tell me what the error(s) is/are so that I will not repeat my mistake in the future. I will very much appreciate it. Thank you."
Magnetic fields do not follow the inverse square law, they decrease with the inverse cube just like tidal forces because there are no magnetic monopoles, only magnetic dipoles. And massive amounts of energy need not be lost by weak coupling either.
hi there desert phile,love your work buti don'tunderstand this,i have had the privalage of owning a lutec magnetic motor (the luck of bieng a relitive i guess)and it has been running my home now for 14 months straight (probably ilegal, but i say all in the name of science hey) anyway i have saved between $1800 - $1900 dollars au in this time period, it just spins without a hitch, how long should it spin for before we know it defenatly works, or will the magnets eventually run down or blow up
many years ago certain people wanted to do away with the patents office ....saying that any thing that could be invented already had....they were lated to be proven IDIOTICALLY wrong....... i also ask why do you speak like kermit the frog...... please disregard this comment if you have suffered a stroke.
Its you again. Winding people up. Where have you been for the past 50 years? reality at the quantum level and its physics Break the laws of physics at the relative level. Saying that you cant get more energy out than you put in is incorrect. Take for instance the ATOMIC BOMB. Nuff said? ps why do you speak like Kermit the frog?
"Its you again. Winding people up. Where have you been for the....."
Instead of just trying to insult me, if you spotted anything I said in this video that is wrong, by all means please do tell me what the error(s) is/are so that I will not repeat my mistake in the future. I will very much appreciate it. Thank you.
"only those crazy enough to dream of changing the world can do it" BECAUSE OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU, THOUSANDS OF IDEAS ARE LOST, YOU TALK ABOUT ENERGY, OK I DARE YOU TO TELL ME WHAT IS ENERGY?, WHAT HAVE YOU EVER CREATED OR INVENTED IN YOUR LIFE?? I BET NOTHING BECAUSE YOU CANT THINK FOR YOURSELF, "IF IT WAS POSSIBLE IT WOULD ALREADY BE DONE" THAT IS THE MOST STUPID THING I HAVE EVER HEARD! WHY DIDNT CARS EXIST IN THE XII CENTURY??? THEY ARE TOTALLY POSSIBLE , WHY? BECAUSE OF PEOPLE AS STUPID AS YOU!
Magnetic fields require energy to be added to them before they can be used to perform work: that is the topic of this video, now what ever the bloody fuck you are going on about.
School children learn about and laugh at the naysayers of the past who said crossing the Atlantic couldn't be done, or that flight was impossible. We've been to the moon. Your sheltered view of things is exactly the mentality that's holding mankind back from making huge the huge leaps in technology we're capable of. You should be ashamed.
It takes a courageous, intuitive, passionate and creative mind to truly drive creation and advancement. A fact is only a fact until it's disproven.
"School children learn about and laugh at the naysayers of the past who said crossing the Atlantic couldn't be done, or that flight was impossible. We've been to the moon."
Off-topic spam is not welcome here. User "UberDoyle" blocked.
Instead of just trying to insult me, if you spotted anything I said in this video that is wrong, by all means please do tell me what the error(s) is/are so that I will not repeat my mistake in the future. I will very much appreciate it. Thank you.
Were over unity possible, you wouldn't need a device to achieve it as cause and effect no longer can apply. It would happen spontaneously and randomly. Glasses of water would randomly overflow, people would randomly fly off into the stratosphere, and all devices would run out of control and explode.
You claim this machine impossible? I laugh at this word. It was used alot over the years. Impossible to your understanding and knowledge maybe.
i'm sure at one point in your life you thaught something to be impossible but later found it to be possible. This is called learning. Have you reached the age to stop learning??
it's ok to feel left behind, tech is progressing very rapidly
That is correct: the device in question is impossible. There is no energy is magnetic fields: they therefore cannot perform work without energy being added. Deal with that, okay?
No, its impossible. Its the first law of thermodynamics. This law is the fundamental law dictating everything. If this law is not true, all mathematics and physics become unsolvable, the laws of nature break down, and it is impossible to predict anything.
Saying that this law is not true is saying 1+1=3. And thats not sarcasm, that is a literal interpretation. Over unity is trying to say 1+1=3.
Well it sounds like your pretty closed minded and putting limits on the progress of your mind. Part of learning and growing is knowing when your wrong. Over unity is impossible.
All of scientific progress is based upon this law.
If you truly believe this, I wouldn't step on a plane, get in a car, or be anywhere near your computer because they all depend upon the first law.
I'm an Engineer. I make a living based on this fact. I'm telling you: Its impossible.
-By establishing a theory... thats all this is, a theory of what might bring about overunity. we are not trying to break a law, just illustrate that there is an aspect to magnetism/gravity that isn't currently accepted.
For all "normal" experiments, the law still applies.
Indeed you are of course 100% correct. These idiots do not even know that they are trying to do is impossible, let alone how they are going to achieve the impossible.
call them idiots? I call them curious. quit your name-calling. It doesn't do justice to your intellect.
Curiosity is the main driving force for innovation,many have been manifested because of tinkering,it brings about pleasant surprises
must be true to most atheists thou.calling people idiots for worshiping voodoo icons, while wallowing in their meaningless lives.A bit prejudical on my part but it's important to exercise scrutiny of oneself before attackng others
I disagree. Is it pretty well established that there are more than just the 1st 2nd and 3rd dimensions? If so it's my contention that laws are relative to the application you are using. And established laws break down under such circumstances. --laws are relative is my point--
I am not as arrogant to believe that I know it to be impossible because of that.
well as far as we know there are only 4 dimensions, all other dimensions are derived in string and M theory. These dimensions are only used to describe the fundamental forces on the quantum level in an effort to derive a unified theory. Still all of these MUST obey the first Law. The first law is the fundamental law governing EVERYTHING in the universe.
It is in fact the only ABSOLUTE law of the universe.
If Jane has 2 apples and Jim gives her 2, Jane now has 6 apples. That would be overunity
I guess I would sit in the "as far as we know" boat. Kurt Vonnegut once said, "God put us on this earth to fart around and don't let anyone tell you otherwise." (R.I.P. good buddy.)
It must be my green-ness in the physics field, but when a magnet levitates another magnet arn't you lifting that mass at no cost? Please explain that phenomena.
Is addition an applicable comparison to the 1st law of thermodynamics? Give me another allegory.
With the magnet it wouldn't be free energy because you have to compress the magnets together AKA put energy into the system (Sort of like a spring). If it just levitating then its not moving and thus has no change in energy and the 1st law.
As for the 1st Law, it could be explained as input and output. You input x amount, your output must be equal to x. Equal an opposite reactions. Energy cannot be destroyed or created. This kills over unity.
Perpetual motion is killed by the 2nd and 3rd Law.
Yes. There is always going to be energy that will go unaccounted for as its impossible to measure anything with 100% accuracy.
Although we may not be able to track each discrete energy path, we know that the total energy out (regardless of form) will be a summation of its inputs.
Further this isn't just for mechanical operations (although it models it pretty well) but any process, be it electrical, mechanical, or chemical, etc.
I disagree. All other dimensions have only been applied in string theories which has yet to be proven as it cant yeild any experimentation. Plus, they're dimensions on a sub-quantum level, they are so small they only effect the fundamental forces.
If your talking about extra-universal dimensional systems then yes, the 1st law could be broken there, in theory, but it would have no way of interacting with our own universe.
1st law holds true in our universe and our 4/4+ dimensional system always.
"If you believe this guy, it's because you're under 18 years of age."
Alas, I will probably never be able to understand why so many people want to believe in fairy tales, miracles, and impossible deeds like a "fuelless generator."
"...If the amount coming out of the system is greater than that going in, then you have created energy..."
you guys might wanna reel your boy back in and explain to him your stance on how energy cannot be created. unless of course you're biased on whom you correct.
He has certainly been told by enough people that what he wants to "invent" is impossible--- which makes him believe all the harder that he can do it. Sheeeish. And some folks say euthanasia is a bad thing.....
Instead of just trying to insult me, if you spotted anything I said in this video that is wrong, by all means please do tell me what the error(s) is/are so that I will not repeat my mistake in the future. I will very much appreciate it. Thank you.
"Just about the only forms of energy that are not expensive are fossil fuels. "
Didn´t the price for one barrel reach 108 dollars recently? Even if there are people that think that gas is cheap, would you not agree that we need new ways of harnessing energy? Perhaps using fossil feuls is an outdated method? And the kingpins of the world want us to continiu using it so they can stay in power and not go bankrupt? It sound like you believe fossile fuels r the way.
Maybe he was blocked for knocking such a funny video. Check out the masturbating video. It isn't what you are expecting. Although it may scar delicate people.
Yes, perhaps that was the reason. I looked for the video and could not find it, strange because I saw it a few days ago on his site. I searched with different word combinations and still nothing.
That´s a deal. some day there will be some one working on it, and if it doesn´t work you´ll hear about it since you learned something NEW now didn´t you? I bet twenty dollars you did know about the electrinium battery two days ago. Listen, it is nothing mystical or magical so dont try to make it in to something it isnt. Read the book and see what you get from it. Or don´t.. The point is, one day we will have technology for exchanging energy that we do not have today. We are far from the peak.
If you want to find out how the Electrinium battery works you need to read the entire book? This is not a recreational book, if you read the entire book you would NOT spit out IDIOTIC comments like "A theoretical battery technology allegedly transmitted to Earth by extraterrestrials." would you? Read the whole book man, really, then discuss it with me or anyone else for that matter.
I have a better idea. My time is precious. So how about someone make the battery and show it to work. It's not like the information is hard to find. I found the book on my first search. If no one has made one in 28 years then there is a good chance that it cannot be made. Funny thing is, even free energy groups are ignoring it.
TheoriginalScooby:Have you read the book? Who is talking about extraterrestrials except for YOU? The books makes total sense, and soo far there is no proof on internet that it has been replicated. That is trange though, because someone should have tried it and in that case told everone it doesnt work.Read the book before you comment on it, I bet 10 bucks you havnt read the book.
I won't bet ten bucks because I did not read the entire book. It was filled with tons of crap. I was only interested in how the battery is made and what it does. The reason no one has bothered is because it wouldn't work as described. Magnets are not creating magnetic energy. They are channeling a specific amount of energy through their loop. A magnet only does work when energy is added. The same would apply to the theoretical battery discussed in that book.
The Original Skobby: I mentioned many things, is David Icke the only you can bring up? Educate yourself man. Learn something about ancient history, politics, physics, theology, and a litle more and then we can discuss instead of insulting each other. Are you american? Did you know they will get rid of your dollar and replace it with the Amero? Check it out if you dont believe me.
I retract my first comment. Anyone that can learn four languages is clearly capable of higher thought. Unfortunately it sounds as if you have rented out your gray matter to the outlandish tales of David Icke. Please seek proper psychiatric help to undue the obvious brainwashing you have undergone.
What is so fantastic about the electrinium battery? A theoretical battery technology allegedly transmitted to Earth by extraterrestrials. Well that sounds good so far. Sadly no one has been able to build one in the 28 years the plans have been available. How strong does it need to smell before you realize it's bullshit?
Desertphile: The electrinium battery has very much to do with what we are all talking about, which is free energy. You are right, this guys magnetic motor proved nothing new. I do believe magnets can be used to help utilize energy from little know to us energy spectrum. Energy is a spectrum of vibration we know very little about. We do not know everything.. YET So, impossible things today will be possible some day.
what do i have to do to qualify for your wrath? is there a form to fill out or something?
are you gonna ban me again like you did before? cause i love that, the way you whine about getting blocked and censored and banned by others when you do the same...whats that called again? christianity? hypocrisy? i always confuse the two and i know the smartest people on the web hang here to hunt down and educatify the stoopud boyz and gurlz
did you look at my MARS video? i know that i am right about this. Overunity is not impossible.. In fact it is the main reason for keeping MATTER intact.. if it didnt everythign would EMPLODE under its own gravity!
Instead of just trying to insult me, if you spotted anything I said in this video that is wrong, by all means please do tell me what the error(s) is/are so that I will not repeat my mistake in the future. I will very much appreciate it. Thank you.
Ok stop saying that things are impossible then. NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE !! And i URGE you to look at a recent video I made About MARS!! And then perhapes you will start the process of being open to new ideas. And realize something different is happening!
Making a magnet motor without adding energy to the system is impossible: magnetic fields cannot perform work without energy being added. "Free energy" is impossible; there is no such thing as "over unity." You'll just have to accept that fact and join us here in the adult world called Reality.
all that you need for somethign to be possible is the thought of doing it!! yes i could jump off the building and have a paracute open and softly make me land on my head and continue to live. USE YOUR BRAIN! thats what it there for!
No parachute. No safety equipment of any kind. Just you and the pavement. The only thing you get is to have 'the thought of doing it' in your head. I say it's impossible. Prove me wrong.
i already did prove you wrong. you said something is impossible. I showed you an example of how to bend the rules and make it possible! Its the same thing with overunity.
You changed the impossible event into a possible one. You obviously don't understand the basic tenet of your own idea or the challenge I issued to your idea. Your theory is debunked until proof is provided.
Desertphile:I totally agree with you that many of those people are doing things that allready have been done,what they need to do is something different.There are other ways of creating energy than the ways we use today.If there werent,what an ignorant FOOK one would be to think so.The dilema is to find them,I believe it wont take long before we can take advantage of new technologies and create enormous quantities of power.Not solar or wind.What r ur thoughts on the electrinium battery?
MakesMeAngry:No one says it´s magic,I agree with Desertphile on many things,however some day we will have knowledge that today is not available,don´t you agree?And when we have that knowledge we will be able to use a form of energy that today is not understandable. That is how the human kind ADVANCES.Stop insulting people and create a discussion instead.Sounds like you´re angry for nothing. Educate yourself instead of repeating what you learned in school.that´s old.Orjustsitin yourBOXandbecomfy.
'some day we will have knowledge that today is not available'
The knowledge we have today was stifled over hundreds of years by dogmatic believers in unseen mystical energies and beings. The energy of tomorrow will not be based on the fantasies of yesterday.
One more thing, its not relly energy from nowhere, nobody said that except YOU. There is energy every where around you, call it ether, vril, electrostatic energy, radiant energy, orgon, whatever you want. the fact is that everything around inside you is nothing more than vibrations and your five senses translate that in to this reality, it´s all an illusion and you´re one dude thats really caught in it.
"One more thing, its not relly energy from nowhere, nobody said that except YOU."
No, asshole, I did not.
One cannot generate electricity without energy: the idiot in the video I replied to believes otherwise, and you fucktards defened him because you morons. That's the fact: you will just have to adjust your childish emotions to deal with that fact.
Funny but I do not agree with you when you say"it would have already been done".People like you have argued to death that earth was flat,the atom was the smallest particle,you know where I am heading.Over unity,energy from the vacum,magnetic motor,artificial gravity,name it.WILL some day work.There is either YES or NO.And I say yes.Go ahead and say no if you want,you will be like one of those people being taken by a river trying to swim upwards.Our laws of physics need to CHANGE.
You are a fucking retard. Thousands of morons are working every weekend to make magic energy from nowhere. Do the Men in Black go door to door stealing their magnets? If you think you can change the laws of physics then you should probably stop thinking altogether.
You are ignorant of whats going on. It's has been done, silly. Watch the following 3 videos found in my, Favorite Video section than come back and correct your statement. But somehow I know you have to much faith in what you know to see the forest for the tree in front of you.
By the way, when someone talks about getting more energy back than that of what they put into it, is called, over unity.
I noticed that when you challenged the gentleman in the video when this matter came up, you were at a complete loss as to how to "properly" address the issue.
You might want to add, "Over Unity" to your vocabulary, and try and take the high road when people piss you off. Otherwise were no better than the next person when we lower our standards to theirs.
Nikola Tesla did a great deal of work in providing cheap (electrical) power to the masses . Sadly big business appears to have caused him severe difficulties :
Ha do you really think it would have already been done!!! Do you know what would happen to the major oil companies if this would happen!! And Fuck Physics!!! The old standard laws of physics no longer even apply!!! Quantum physics says it is possible!! And it has already been accomplished by Nikola Tesla in the 40's!!!! Shit! Do extensive research before saying something is impossible!! Nothing is impossible!!
Grate looks like he blocked me. I did not do any name calling and was vary nice I thought and he blocked me. I Guess he only wants comments that are in agreement with him. He failed to say that in his video.
"Ha do you really think it would have already been done!"
Hee hee! Yeah, you are certainly right. Many othger people have left polite comments, and they have all been deleted. The clown has serious emotional issues, I suppose.
exactly, now imagine what this would do to a person down on his luck that finally found something that made him happy. And someone not just spoiled it for him (without reason).
but insulted him also,next time just send him here, i'll explain energy transfer.
It's funny how the anti-scientific creationist nutbags erronously accuse evolution of violating the laws of thermodynamics, and these guys can't see how all forms of "free energy" absolutely do run afoul of the laws of physics. I can't decide which error is more ignorant...
While I don't believe that the ideas put forth by the person in question can work, I
do not believe it was necessary to be personally insulting to him, or to call him
an idiot. His ideas while flawed, do represent an attempt to improve his world in
some small way. You, on the other hand, represent rudeness, cruelty, and a
complete lack of imagination. You add nothing to the world.
milohemlock 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Unlimited energy sources are out there!But the powerfull Oil business won't alow common ppl to know this,Find this technology at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the revolution!
buchananfibbing 1 year ago
@Desertphile - BACKING YOU 100% !!!! I got an idea, lets put up a prize, a big prize, for someone, anyone that can find this holygrail!!! - I think it's a safe bet.
tomview1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Belive it or not Free energy is real,But the Oil companies want these technologies unknown to the masses,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Big change is comming soon!
breeannaqktjbl 1 year ago
id hate to break it to you ..there is a magnet motor...and what if water spins your homemede simple generater...
chadfredrickson1 1 year ago
@chadfredrickson1 ; The topic is not magnetic motors, idiot. I's about motors that run on magic.
Desertphile 1 year ago
@Desertphile hay check this... ..i was polite ....i agree with alot you said...so i dont want to get off on the wrong foot ,,,but dont call me names/idiot..be mature,
p.s. i should have put a questionmark after simple generater...that would have been more apropreate...so lets move past name calling and maybee now that you know it was a question you can reply properly...im quessing thats basicly a hydroelectric damn is...
chadfredrickson1 1 year ago
Another good video Desertphile.
valveman12 1 year ago
@valveman12 Thank you. Now and then I wish that the believers in "free energy" would at the very least look at the history of "free energy" attempts, or just take a remedial physics class.
Desertphile 1 year ago
I couldn't agree with you more. I do believe that we can work to make things run more efficienty. Having spent 12years studying Science and Engineering, it's hilarious how many think that education is a conspiracy to hide the truth. I'm all for someone trying some of these things out to learn how things work in out Natural World, but most just take it on blind faith. Keep the videos coming.
valveman12 1 year ago
Cleanest shave i ever saw .
dan020350 2 years ago
First time I've seen you. Why the snotty attitude? Why not just present your argument on its own merits? Does demeaning others give you that much of a thrill? geez.
OrganCat 2 years ago
I forbid you from watching my videos.
Desertphile 2 years ago
I'm heartbroken. Buh-bye.
OrganCat 2 years ago
DesertPhile! Wow, we finally agree on something. All these perpetual motion con artists are a real blast from the past, too funny.
However, it's odd how you cannot see that increasing information from a single cell and advancing in complexity to arrive at all life on earth isn't exactly the same as perpetual motion. Darwin's "mechanism" of natural selection is just like the motors, just a wishful illusion. But people will tinker with these ideas endlessly.
imikewillrockyou 3 years ago
"...t's odd how you cannot see that increasing information from a single cell and advancing in complexity to...."
1) How are you defining "information" in biology? Be the first Creationist on the planet to do so.
2) What is your matrix for "advancing in complexity?" Be the first Creationist on the planet to explain.
Thank you.
Desertphile 3 years ago
"How are you defining "information" in biology..."
Same way biologist do. There are genetic instructions required to make a heart, lung or an eye for example. For these instructions to exist information is required. For something more complex to evolve more information must be added.
I dont see there is any evidence to support the idea that any life on earth is advancing in complexity and in fact everything we observe confirms the opposite. Life is declining not evolving.
imikewillrockyou 3 years ago
"For something more complex to evolve more information must be added."
and it arrives from the competition among peers for limited resources(food, mates,etc)
"I dont see there is any evidence to support the idea that any life on earth is advancing in complexity"
The first life forms were single celled. We are not. We are more complex. SOME people call that evidence.
damianpoirier 3 years ago
"The first life forms were single celled..."
Ok then how did cell mitosis evolve? Since you would need cell mitosiss for anything replicate, and therefore evolve, at all? And cell mitosis is highly complex in the extreme. Explain that evolutionary process to me.
And if that extreme amount of complexity can exist without evolution then why do we need evolution to explain life at all?
imikewillrockyou 3 years ago
"Since you would need cell mitosiss for anything replicate, and therefore evolve, at all? "
prokaryotes replicate without mitosis.
damianpoirier 3 years ago
Are you suggesting life evolved from prokaryotes? If not you now have an even larger problem. Not just cells but prokaryotes too have this paradox. They have a complex means of replication that needed to exist for it to exist in the first place.
imikewillrockyou 3 years ago
"They have a complex means of replication that needed to exist for it to exist in the first place."
No.
Desertphile 3 years ago
Desertphile, are you going to tell me that God did it? I mean how did that first cell arrive, reproduce and advance in complexity to become a Desertphile?
imikewillrockyou 3 years ago
"Ok then how did cell mitosis evolve? Since you would need cell mitosiss for anything replicate,"
Why do you assume you would need mitosis? Just because that's a system you see now, don't assume it always was the system. Actually plenty of chemicals replicate far below the level of mitosis. Never assume.
Ozzyman200 3 years ago
"Never assume."
Hey man, you are preaching to the choir with that one. I agree, let's not assume. And boy did Darwin assume A LOT!
Even the fossil record refutes Darwin. Here is a very well made, none creationist, short vid you will like.
watch?v=2Du64ExQvBc
imikewillrockyou 3 years ago
I am not preaching to the choir. You assumed mitosis was needed for reproduction. This was a false assumption. Go back through your assertions, remove any assumptions, and you will get closer to the truth. Good luck
Ozzyman200 3 years ago
"Darwin's "mechanism" of natural selection is just like the motors, just a wishful illusion. "
It would be, if the faster deer were caught as often as the slower ones. Or if the camouflaged were as easily seen as the brightly colored.
damianpoirier 3 years ago
"It would be, if the faster deer were caught as often as the slower ones."
That doesn't "increase" information. On the contrary that eliminates information, in this case the slow deer wont be passing on that DNA. That is loss of information, perhaps beneficial loss, but loss nonetheless. We constantly use genetic loss to create different breeds of dogs. For example we can breed a wolf into a poodle but the never the poodle back into a wolf. That's due to genetic loss.
imikewillrockyou 3 years ago
"For example we can breed a wolf into a poodle but the never the poodle back into a wolf."
no, you probable could breed a poodle back into a wolf(think atavisms), but by the time that happen the new wolf and the descendants of the present wolf would be separate species.
The DNA sequences don't bear out your ideas. Can you explain the ERVs we have in our DNA in the same locations as chimps do?
damianpoirier 3 years ago 2
We share ERVs markers with cats too can you explain that?
The reason we share the EVRs with chimps is because humans in the past and even today eat chimps. Raw primate brains are really good stuff in some cultures. Thus humans and chimps are exposed the same viruses. Many of these EVRs favor regions and thus having matches is meaningless. The very reason that science is so promising is they believe its possible that they can hit the exact location ever time and do some very cool stuff.
imikewillrockyou 3 years ago
"The reason we share the EVRs with chimps is because humans in the past and even today eat chimps."
Sorry but no way. Cows and horses also share ERVs. Are you suggesting they've been eating each other? If not, then how do you explain?
Ozzyman200 3 years ago
mike thinks we're not talking about viruses as markers that have got themselves logged permanently in out genome by infecting a sex cell then breaking and failing to proceed in the normal viral route of killing the cell.
He thinks were talking about getting sick from the same virus. That's why he mentioned cats. LOL.
damianpoirier 3 years ago 2
"humans in the past and even today eat chimps"
Maybe he's thinking of chips?
Ozzyman200 3 years ago
"That's why he mentioned cats. LOL."
No I mentioned cats because of a scientific study on the subject I read a long time ago. And my mistake it's cats and baboons that share the markers. Still sinks your ship. If cats and baboons can share the markers does that mean they are of common decent???? Can't have it both ways.
The study: "The discovery of endogenous retroviruses Robin A Weiss1
1Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, London W1T 4JF, UK"
imikewillrockyou 3 years ago
We are actually relate to every living thing. We share a common ancestor with everything: cats, baboons, mushrooms, everything. We can tell how closely partly from how similar our ERV patterns are. So you saying that cats and baoons have common ancestors fits perfectly with the idea of common descent. Cheers.
Ozzyman200 3 years ago
"We are actually relate to every living thing...."
You better study a little more about EVRs. Even the study that discovered the matches didn't attempt to explain the matches via common decent. You also might need to go back to TOE 101.
imikewillrockyou 3 years ago
No, apparently you need to study more. If you disagree with science, provide a reason and evidence, don't just make claims with no base. We are indeed related to every living thing, but it's not particularly ERVs that tell us this.
Please don't post without doing a little research first.
Ozzyman200 3 years ago
So far I'm the only one that posted a scientific study (that you clearly didn't understand). All you have is hot air saying that I disagree with science? Typical blind faith Darwinist.
evillusion (net)
imikewillrockyou 3 years ago
gamma-retrovirus was isolated from the baboon. It was found to be closely related antigenically and by sequence homology to the endogenous RD114 virus in cats. Only certain species of the cat genus, have this endogenous genome related to the baboon ERV. In contrast, all species of baboons carry this virus so it was present in primates much longer. It seems evident that a HORIZONTAL [emphasis mine], infectious event occurred to transfer the virus from baboons to cats.
[edited slightly to fit]
damianpoirier 3 years ago
Since cats would be quite likely to scavenge and feed on baboon placentae, a possible exposure to the virus can be envisioned. The human placenta is also permissive to the expression of multiple families of human endogenous retrovirus (HERV) genomes. Indeed, it appears that the retroviral envelope glycoproteins of at least one of them (HERV-W and possibly ERV-3) may be involved in natural syncytium induction to form the syncytiotrophoblast.
THEY ARE BOTH SUSEPTABLE TO THE VIRUS. Different story.
damianpoirier 3 years ago
You seem to be under the mistaken impression that were talking about merely having been infected by the same kind of flu or something. We're not talking about like a human catching a virus and a chimp catching a virus showing that the virus can infect both species.
Here's a text example gene. =uninfected
Here's a text exERVample gene. =infected
Here's a text exaERVmple gene. =infected in a different place means not common ancestor
damianpoirier 3 years ago
The following video explains the ERV scene in depth.
/watch?v=TUxLR9hdorI
damianpoirier 3 years ago
"...It seems evident that a HORIZONTAL [emphasis mine], infectious event occurred..."
Yes, and my point was if this can happen with baboons and cats, then whole evrs = common decent argument goes out the window. Obviously there are other explanations that are being conveinantly ignored. I'm not surprised. Read Icons of Evolution by Dr. Jonathan Wells. The amount of fraud surrounding Darwinism couldnt just be a mistake.
imikewillrockyou 3 years ago
"then whole evrs = common decent argument goes out the window."
mike mike mike. When will you understand that we are not discussing the act of being infected by a retrovirus?
damianpoirier 3 years ago
"We share ERVs markers with cats too can you explain that? "
do we? Citation?
"The reason we share the EVRs with chimps is because humans in the past and even today eat chimps."
wrong. the imposition of a virus into a specific location of a chromosome of a sex cell is the only way the viruses get to BE in the same location. Otherwise you are begging for 98,000 infections to accidentally end up in the exact same place on both humans and chimps independently.
damianpoirier 3 years ago 2
Do You know Donald Duck?
StewedTomato 3 years ago
Blame it on Bush!
StewedTomato 3 years ago
Oh Phil,
It's plain down useless to educate them.
Simply does not work. They'll never get the reality and will attempt to rape thermodynamics.
Magnets fascinate them.
Talk about poor education...
Sigh, gone for coffee....
ecomafia 3 years ago
"It's plain down useless to educate them."
I admit I have an obsession on the subject. :-) I try not to look at the latest 'free energy' videos, but I find myself unable to resist. Otch, I need help.....
Desertphile 3 years ago
Well Phill,
Found a "tasty" one. Looks like things loose inertia as well as many other amazing properties.
Here watch?v=46gRnzI2os0
from DrTerryMoore , commented by Beamshipcaptain
I adore them folks, so cute, so innocent...
Lovers of rare earth things...
Ok take care and nice day or night ;)
ecomafia 3 years ago
The US Scientists who invented the Nuclear Bomb, handed it over to the USSR. The Arms Race Began, all working Perpetual Motion Machines were halted. Tesla, Maxwell, some kid in a school yard, and a guy named Sutter, did achieve overunity. Industry did not always include assembly lines. Inventors are considered a potential risk to national security. Weapons grade elements in mass production supersede clean energy. Government is still fighting a half-life war to keep a stockpile for readiness.
FlavoredCoffeeGuy 3 years ago
Great comments, I like your breakdown of the information. Do you talk this way when you talk to you dogs? And when is the last time you played with your dolls hanging off the funky curtain? By the way do you have nay knives for sell?
johnnyboypdq 3 years ago
I'm sure it's all the body thetans that are responsible for the power loss. Heh. ;)
sy1234 3 years ago
You also said at the beginning that perpetual has been known impossible for hundreds of years. No, just about 100 now. The strongest nail in the coffin came in 1905 with the special theory of relativity, which unified the theory of energy conservation with the theories of mass conservation and momentum conservation. You even said it right twice at the end when you said "nearly one hundred years". Perhaps you should rehearse these things a little more? It doesn't have to be done in one take...
supersandor 3 years ago
So like I was saying - if you used a magnetic field to impart a dremel's rotational momentum into a hard disk's r.m. even if it was by a weakly coupled magnetic field, that wouldn't necessarily cause it to be a massive amount of energy lost. Less energy will be transferred, but in turn there will be less of a load seen by the dremel you see. The same thing happens with a transformer with a low coupling coefficient. Even with a 1% coupling coefficient you can transfer energy with 99% efficiency.
supersandor 3 years ago
no. Output Strength = 1/distance_from_generator^2. These are nonfocused electromagnetic fields, even with focused one will most likely never be able to reach 99%, that´s like reaching the lightspeed-barrier - the closer you get, the harder it will be to proceed
googlespasten 3 years ago
It has nothing to do with the inverse square law. As a matter of fact, magnetic fields decrease with the inverse CUBE of the distance, not the inverse square, since magnetic fields are always dipoles and never monopoles like electric or gravitational fields. It has nothing at ALL to do with light-speed, it is magnetic coupling of two rotating objects. If they were suspended in a vacuum, perhaps floating in orbit, you could get damn near 100% efficiency with barely any detectable coupling at all.
supersandor 3 years ago
do you even know what you´re talking about? If the Denominator gets bigger (cubic > sqare), your resulting force will be EVEN SMALLER, thats simple math! Who said that the magnetic force has something to do with the speed of light? Nobody, that was a analogy! Monopoles still dont exist, even in electricity there is ALWAYS a positive and a negative charge, even with electrostatic induction you´ll only see dipoles, maybe the second pole will be under the surface of the object (like on a haircomb).
googlespasten 3 years ago
"force" = "field strength"
googlespasten 3 years ago
"Instead of just trying to insult me, if you spotted anything I said in this video that is wrong, by all means please do tell me what the error(s) is/are so that I will not repeat my mistake in the future. I will very much appreciate it. Thank you."
Magnetic fields do not follow the inverse square law, they decrease with the inverse cube just like tidal forces because there are no magnetic monopoles, only magnetic dipoles. And massive amounts of energy need not be lost by weak coupling either.
supersandor 3 years ago
or something, cheers popstar, ps look them up
Popstarlive2005 3 years ago
hi there desert phile,love your work buti don'tunderstand this,i have had the privalage of owning a lutec magnetic motor (the luck of bieng a relitive i guess)and it has been running my home now for 14 months straight (probably ilegal, but i say all in the name of science hey) anyway i have saved between $1800 - $1900 dollars au in this time period, it just spins without a hitch, how long should it spin for before we know it defenatly works, or will the magnets eventually run down or blow up
Popstarlive2005 3 years ago
"... ,i have had the privalage of owning a lutec...."
The idiot Lutec device uses nearly twice the electricity as it produces--- I hope you can get your money back.
Desertphile 3 years ago
many years ago certain people wanted to do away with the patents office ....saying that any thing that could be invented already had....they were lated to be proven IDIOTICALLY wrong....... i also ask why do you speak like kermit the frog...... please disregard this comment if you have suffered a stroke.
tinkergalloot 3 years ago
"many years ago certain people wanted to do away with the patents office...."
This video has nothing to do with patents or the office of patents. It appears you are confusing this video with a different video.
Desertphile 3 years ago
Its you again. Winding people up. Where have you been for the past 50 years? reality at the quantum level and its physics Break the laws of physics at the relative level. Saying that you cant get more energy out than you put in is incorrect. Take for instance the ATOMIC BOMB. Nuff said? ps why do you speak like Kermit the frog?
swiftdigger 3 years ago
"Its you again. Winding people up. Where have you been for the....."
Instead of just trying to insult me, if you spotted anything I said in this video that is wrong, by all means please do tell me what the error(s) is/are so that I will not repeat my mistake in the future. I will very much appreciate it. Thank you.
Desertphile 3 years ago
"only those crazy enough to dream of changing the world can do it" BECAUSE OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU, THOUSANDS OF IDEAS ARE LOST, YOU TALK ABOUT ENERGY, OK I DARE YOU TO TELL ME WHAT IS ENERGY?, WHAT HAVE YOU EVER CREATED OR INVENTED IN YOUR LIFE?? I BET NOTHING BECAUSE YOU CANT THINK FOR YOURSELF, "IF IT WAS POSSIBLE IT WOULD ALREADY BE DONE" THAT IS THE MOST STUPID THING I HAVE EVER HEARD! WHY DIDNT CARS EXIST IN THE XII CENTURY??? THEY ARE TOTALLY POSSIBLE , WHY? BECAUSE OF PEOPLE AS STUPID AS YOU!
notsuferatu 3 years ago
"BECAUSE OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU, THOUSANDS OF IDEAS ARE LOST,"
Idiot.
"OK I DARE YOU TO TELL ME WHAT IS ENERGY"
Energy: the ability to perform work.
You're welcome.
Desertphile 3 years ago
magnets do so have the ability to do work, if your magnet is in the proximity of a piece of metal, it will move the piece of metal, thus work.
"if it could be done, it would already have been done" is a sketchy argument and not backed up with evidence.
Alot of what we are taught in public school is false and largely on a need to know basis.
But I don't know why I bother, you certainly don't care for thoughtful debate, you only stick to the Conservation of Energy law.
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
"magnets do so have the ability to do work...."
Magnetic fields require energy to be added to them before they can be used to perform work: that is the topic of this video, now what ever the bloody fuck you are going on about.
Desertphile 3 years ago
School children learn about and laugh at the naysayers of the past who said crossing the Atlantic couldn't be done, or that flight was impossible. We've been to the moon. Your sheltered view of things is exactly the mentality that's holding mankind back from making huge the huge leaps in technology we're capable of. You should be ashamed.
It takes a courageous, intuitive, passionate and creative mind to truly drive creation and advancement. A fact is only a fact until it's disproven.
UberDoyle 3 years ago 2
"School children learn about and laugh at the naysayers of the past who said crossing the Atlantic couldn't be done, or that flight was impossible. We've been to the moon."
Off-topic spam is not welcome here. User "UberDoyle" blocked.
Desertphile 3 years ago
The philosophical mindset is the same thou.
"It takes a courageous, intuitive, passionate and creative mind to truly drive creation and advancement. A fact is only a fact until it's disproven."
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
"The philosophical mindset is the same thou."
Instead of just trying to insult me, if you spotted anything I said in this video that is wrong, by all means please do tell me what the error(s) is/are so that I will not repeat my mistake in the future. I will very much appreciate it. Thank you.
Desertphile 3 years ago
"If it could be done it would already have been done"
This is a fallacious claim. Do not repeat this mistake, atheist.
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
"This is a fallacious claim."
No. The idea is hundreds of years old; many thousands of people have thought of it. If it was not impossible it would have already been done.
Desertphile 3 years ago
Were over unity possible, you wouldn't need a device to achieve it as cause and effect no longer can apply. It would happen spontaneously and randomly. Glasses of water would randomly overflow, people would randomly fly off into the stratosphere, and all devices would run out of control and explode.
deepfishstick 3 years ago
You claim this machine impossible? I laugh at this word. It was used alot over the years. Impossible to your understanding and knowledge maybe.
i'm sure at one point in your life you thaught something to be impossible but later found it to be possible. This is called learning. Have you reached the age to stop learning??
it's ok to feel left behind, tech is progressing very rapidly
marciano79 3 years ago
"You claim this machine impossible?"
That is correct: the device in question is impossible. There is no energy is magnetic fields: they therefore cannot perform work without energy being added. Deal with that, okay?
Desertphile 3 years ago
define energy.
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
"define energy."
The ability to perform work.
You're welcome.
Desertphile 3 years ago
define work :D
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
Energy (derived from mechanical work):
Joule(SI unit of energy) = the energy required to move a particle 1 meter with a constant force of 1 Newton.
Can be used to describe mechanical work, heat, kinetic energy, internal energy, potential energy, mass, etc. (all described in joules)
deepfishstick 3 years ago
Joule, Btu, ft-lb, N-m, etc.
defined as having units of Force*Distance.
Can exist in many forms though: mechanical work, heat, magnetic fields, electric fields, speed(with respect to mass), matter, etc.
Power is simply the rate of Energy per unit time.
deepfishstick 3 years ago
No, its impossible. Its the first law of thermodynamics. This law is the fundamental law dictating everything. If this law is not true, all mathematics and physics become unsolvable, the laws of nature break down, and it is impossible to predict anything.
Saying that this law is not true is saying 1+1=3. And thats not sarcasm, that is a literal interpretation. Over unity is trying to say 1+1=3.
End of story.
deepfishstick 3 years ago
end of story for you... yes, but not for me and many others. It's to bad your putting limits on the progress of your mind.
law = limit of your understanding.
marciano79 3 years ago
Well it sounds like your pretty closed minded and putting limits on the progress of your mind. Part of learning and growing is knowing when your wrong. Over unity is impossible.
All of scientific progress is based upon this law.
If you truly believe this, I wouldn't step on a plane, get in a car, or be anywhere near your computer because they all depend upon the first law.
I'm an Engineer. I make a living based on this fact. I'm telling you: Its impossible.
End of Story... Really
deepfishstick 3 years ago
how are unknowns solved?
-By establishing a theory... thats all this is, a theory of what might bring about overunity. we are not trying to break a law, just illustrate that there is an aspect to magnetism/gravity that isn't currently accepted.
For all "normal" experiments, the law still applies.
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
"end of story for you... yes, but not for me and many others."
How many times are idiots like yourself going to insists 1+1=3?
Desertphile 3 years ago
"Over unity is trying to say 1+1=3."
Indeed you are of course 100% correct. These idiots do not even know that they are trying to do is impossible, let alone how they are going to achieve the impossible.
Desertphile 3 years ago
call them idiots? I call them curious. quit your name-calling. It doesn't do justice to your intellect.
Curiosity is the main driving force for innovation,many have been manifested because of tinkering,it brings about pleasant surprises
must be true to most atheists thou.calling people idiots for worshiping voodoo icons, while wallowing in their meaningless lives.A bit prejudical on my part but it's important to exercise scrutiny of oneself before attackng others
Criticism is a two-way street
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
I disagree. Is it pretty well established that there are more than just the 1st 2nd and 3rd dimensions? If so it's my contention that laws are relative to the application you are using. And established laws break down under such circumstances. --laws are relative is my point--
I am not as arrogant to believe that I know it to be impossible because of that.
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
well as far as we know there are only 4 dimensions, all other dimensions are derived in string and M theory. These dimensions are only used to describe the fundamental forces on the quantum level in an effort to derive a unified theory. Still all of these MUST obey the first Law. The first law is the fundamental law governing EVERYTHING in the universe.
It is in fact the only ABSOLUTE law of the universe.
If Jane has 2 apples and Jim gives her 2, Jane now has 6 apples. That would be overunity
deepfishstick 3 years ago
I guess I would sit in the "as far as we know" boat. Kurt Vonnegut once said, "God put us on this earth to fart around and don't let anyone tell you otherwise." (R.I.P. good buddy.)
It must be my green-ness in the physics field, but when a magnet levitates another magnet arn't you lifting that mass at no cost? Please explain that phenomena.
Is addition an applicable comparison to the 1st law of thermodynamics? Give me another allegory.
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
With the magnet it wouldn't be free energy because you have to compress the magnets together AKA put energy into the system (Sort of like a spring). If it just levitating then its not moving and thus has no change in energy and the 1st law.
As for the 1st Law, it could be explained as input and output. You input x amount, your output must be equal to x. Equal an opposite reactions. Energy cannot be destroyed or created. This kills over unity.
Perpetual motion is killed by the 2nd and 3rd Law.
deepfishstick 3 years ago
alrighty. the Law of conservation of energy must be an almighty law.
So if Xinput = Xoutput with most basic mechanical operations, what if the equation fails to take in account of an unknown?
input = output
X(i) = X(i)
X equals the energy we've accounted for
i equals the energy we've not
Is that plausible?
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
Yes. There is always going to be energy that will go unaccounted for as its impossible to measure anything with 100% accuracy.
Although we may not be able to track each discrete energy path, we know that the total energy out (regardless of form) will be a summation of its inputs.
Further this isn't just for mechanical operations (although it models it pretty well) but any process, be it electrical, mechanical, or chemical, etc.
deepfishstick 3 years ago
I disagree. All other dimensions have only been applied in string theories which has yet to be proven as it cant yeild any experimentation. Plus, they're dimensions on a sub-quantum level, they are so small they only effect the fundamental forces.
If your talking about extra-universal dimensional systems then yes, the 1st law could be broken there, in theory, but it would have no way of interacting with our own universe.
1st law holds true in our universe and our 4/4+ dimensional system always.
deepfishstick 3 years ago
"Self Running 900 Watt Fuelless Electrical Generator"
Enter the exact search above into Google. If you believe this guy, it's because you're under 18 years of age.
ConcentrationCamps 3 years ago 2
"If you believe this guy, it's because you're under 18 years of age."
Alas, I will probably never be able to understand why so many people want to believe in fairy tales, miracles, and impossible deeds like a "fuelless generator."
Desertphile 3 years ago
maybe because we're tired of providing the free lunch for those running the world.
ParapaDrifter 3 years ago
Some quality trash talk on this page! LOL
Desertphool is really strutting his stuff!
People that make multiple IDs on YouTube are just taking it too far!
Drevtoobe 3 years ago
freshmanrob says
"...If the amount coming out of the system is greater than that going in, then you have created energy..."
you guys might wanna reel your boy back in and explain to him your stance on how energy cannot be created. unless of course you're biased on whom you correct.
desertphool 3 years ago
What a WANK-TARD! and the rest of this idiot's followers are WANK-TARDS as well. He does not get that he can NOT do this...
mobiltec 3 years ago
"He does not get that he can NOT do this..."
He has certainly been told by enough people that what he wants to "invent" is impossible--- which makes him believe all the harder that he can do it. Sheeeish. And some folks say euthanasia is a bad thing.....
Desertphile 3 years ago
Have another drink there buddy.
closetpunk2006 3 years ago
Hi I don;t drink the video just slow framing..LOL
dwprodrum 3 years ago
"Have another drink there buddy."
Instead of just trying to insult me, if you spotted anything I said in this video that is wrong, by all means please do tell me what the error(s) is/are so that I will not repeat my mistake in the future. I will very much appreciate it. Thank you.
Desertphile 3 years ago
Ok, sorry.
tensevendeepsixed 3 years ago
yeah they said that about the helicopter to i believe
armymac78 3 years ago
Desertphile:
You commented.
"Just about the only forms of energy that are not expensive are fossil fuels. "
Didn´t the price for one barrel reach 108 dollars recently? Even if there are people that think that gas is cheap, would you not agree that we need new ways of harnessing energy? Perhaps using fossil feuls is an outdated method? And the kingpins of the world want us to continiu using it so they can stay in power and not go bankrupt? It sound like you believe fossile fuels r the way.
suiris24 3 years ago
Desertphile: The guy you blocket did not write the Masturbating comment to you. It was a comment written to AngryNotsoOldhippe.
suiris24 3 years ago
Maybe he was blocked for knocking such a funny video. Check out the masturbating video. It isn't what you are expecting. Although it may scar delicate people.
theoriginalSkooby 3 years ago
Yes, perhaps that was the reason. I looked for the video and could not find it, strange because I saw it a few days ago on his site. I searched with different word combinations and still nothing.
suiris24 3 years ago
That´s a deal. some day there will be some one working on it, and if it doesn´t work you´ll hear about it since you learned something NEW now didn´t you? I bet twenty dollars you did know about the electrinium battery two days ago. Listen, it is nothing mystical or magical so dont try to make it in to something it isnt. Read the book and see what you get from it. Or don´t.. The point is, one day we will have technology for exchanging energy that we do not have today. We are far from the peak.
suiris24 3 years ago
To The Original Skooby:
Dear Skooby,
If you want to find out how the Electrinium battery works you need to read the entire book? This is not a recreational book, if you read the entire book you would NOT spit out IDIOTIC comments like "A theoretical battery technology allegedly transmitted to Earth by extraterrestrials." would you? Read the whole book man, really, then discuss it with me or anyone else for that matter.
suiris24 3 years ago
I have a better idea. My time is precious. So how about someone make the battery and show it to work. It's not like the information is hard to find. I found the book on my first search. If no one has made one in 28 years then there is a good chance that it cannot be made. Funny thing is, even free energy groups are ignoring it.
theoriginalSkooby 3 years ago
"I have a better idea. My time is precious."
which is why he is posting on some obscure video clip on youtube... of course your time is precious and you ARE special just like mommy told you
desertphool 3 years ago
rah rah rah show evidence rah rah rah
theoriginalSkooby 3 years ago 2
TheoriginalScooby:Have you read the book? Who is talking about extraterrestrials except for YOU? The books makes total sense, and soo far there is no proof on internet that it has been replicated. That is trange though, because someone should have tried it and in that case told everone it doesnt work.Read the book before you comment on it, I bet 10 bucks you havnt read the book.
suiris24 3 years ago
I won't bet ten bucks because I did not read the entire book. It was filled with tons of crap. I was only interested in how the battery is made and what it does. The reason no one has bothered is because it wouldn't work as described. Magnets are not creating magnetic energy. They are channeling a specific amount of energy through their loop. A magnet only does work when energy is added. The same would apply to the theoretical battery discussed in that book.
theoriginalSkooby 3 years ago
The Original Skobby: I mentioned many things, is David Icke the only you can bring up? Educate yourself man. Learn something about ancient history, politics, physics, theology, and a litle more and then we can discuss instead of insulting each other. Are you american? Did you know they will get rid of your dollar and replace it with the Amero? Check it out if you dont believe me.
suiris24 3 years ago
"The Original Skobby: I mentione...."
What has that to do with this video?
Desertphile 3 years ago
I retract my first comment. Anyone that can learn four languages is clearly capable of higher thought. Unfortunately it sounds as if you have rented out your gray matter to the outlandish tales of David Icke. Please seek proper psychiatric help to undue the obvious brainwashing you have undergone.
theoriginalSkooby 3 years ago
DESERTPHILE:
The Electrinium battery,
know anyting about it?
suiris24 3 years ago
What is so fantastic about the electrinium battery? A theoretical battery technology allegedly transmitted to Earth by extraterrestrials. Well that sounds good so far. Sadly no one has been able to build one in the 28 years the plans have been available. How strong does it need to smell before you realize it's bullshit?
theoriginalSkooby 3 years ago
"A theoretical battery technology allegedly transmitted to Earth by extraterrestrials."
ROTFL!!!! Good gods that's funny!
Desertphile 3 years ago
"know anyting about it?"
Does it have anything to do with this video?
Desertphile 3 years ago
Desertphile: The electrinium battery has very much to do with what we are all talking about, which is free energy. You are right, this guys magnetic motor proved nothing new. I do believe magnets can be used to help utilize energy from little know to us energy spectrum. Energy is a spectrum of vibration we know very little about. We do not know everything.. YET So, impossible things today will be possible some day.
suiris24 3 years ago
what do i have to do to qualify for your wrath? is there a form to fill out or something?
are you gonna ban me again like you did before? cause i love that, the way you whine about getting blocked and censored and banned by others when you do the same...whats that called again? christianity? hypocrisy? i always confuse the two and i know the smartest people on the web hang here to hunt down and educatify the stoopud boyz and gurlz
desertphool 3 years ago
did you look at my MARS video? i know that i am right about this. Overunity is not impossible.. In fact it is the main reason for keeping MATTER intact.. if it didnt everythign would EMPLODE under its own gravity!
captcaveman4201 3 years ago
"Overunity is not impossible."
Yes, alas, it is impossible. The laws of physics and thermodynamics prove it. Sorry.
Desertphile 3 years ago
" In fact it is the main reason for keeping MATTER intact"
LOL! You're a fucking lunatic.
AngryNotSoOldHippy 3 years ago
ok fuc tard! im not the one with videos with the label Mastrubating with your mother in the room. Go wipe your ass with a leaf u asshole.
captcaveman4201 3 years ago
"ok fuc tard! im not the one with videos with the label Mastrubating with your mother in the room. Go wipe your ass with a leaf u asshole."
User blocked.
Desertphile 3 years ago
your soo full of shit. if it was possible then it would have already happened. Do you even realize how fucking dumb that sounds?
captcaveman4201 3 years ago
"your soo full of shit"
Instead of just trying to insult me, if you spotted anything I said in this video that is wrong, by all means please do tell me what the error(s) is/are so that I will not repeat my mistake in the future. I will very much appreciate it. Thank you.
Desertphile 3 years ago
Ok stop saying that things are impossible then. NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE !! And i URGE you to look at a recent video I made About MARS!! And then perhapes you will start the process of being open to new ideas. And realize something different is happening!
captcaveman4201 3 years ago
"Ok stop saying that things are impossible then."
No.
"NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE"
Making a magnet motor without adding energy to the system is impossible: magnetic fields cannot perform work without energy being added. "Free energy" is impossible; there is no such thing as "over unity." You'll just have to accept that fact and join us here in the adult world called Reality.
Desertphile 3 years ago
"NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE"
LOL! Um, could it be that you're a fucking insane lunatic? Just maybe?
AngryNotSoOldHippy 3 years ago
'NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE'
Jump off of the Empire state building and land on your head and continue to live. Then we can discuss your theory. Until then it's quackery.
theoriginalSkooby 3 years ago
all that you need for somethign to be possible is the thought of doing it!! yes i could jump off the building and have a paracute open and softly make me land on my head and continue to live. USE YOUR BRAIN! thats what it there for!
captcaveman4201 3 years ago
No parachute. No safety equipment of any kind. Just you and the pavement. The only thing you get is to have 'the thought of doing it' in your head. I say it's impossible. Prove me wrong.
theoriginalSkooby 3 years ago
i already did prove you wrong. you said something is impossible. I showed you an example of how to bend the rules and make it possible! Its the same thing with overunity.
captcaveman4201 3 years ago
You changed the impossible event into a possible one. You obviously don't understand the basic tenet of your own idea or the challenge I issued to your idea. Your theory is debunked until proof is provided.
theoriginalSkooby 3 years ago
Desertphile:I totally agree with you that many of those people are doing things that allready have been done,what they need to do is something different.There are other ways of creating energy than the ways we use today.If there werent,what an ignorant FOOK one would be to think so.The dilema is to find them,I believe it wont take long before we can take advantage of new technologies and create enormous quantities of power.Not solar or wind.What r ur thoughts on the electrinium battery?
suiris24 3 years ago
I would like to take something I said earlier, our laws of physics DO NOT need to change, they need to EXPAND.
suiris24 3 years ago
Nut.
MakesMeAngry 3 years ago
MakesMeAngry:No one says it´s magic,I agree with Desertphile on many things,however some day we will have knowledge that today is not available,don´t you agree?And when we have that knowledge we will be able to use a form of energy that today is not understandable. That is how the human kind ADVANCES.Stop insulting people and create a discussion instead.Sounds like you´re angry for nothing. Educate yourself instead of repeating what you learned in school.that´s old.Orjustsitin yourBOXandbecomfy.
suiris24 3 years ago
'some day we will have knowledge that today is not available'
The knowledge we have today was stifled over hundreds of years by dogmatic believers in unseen mystical energies and beings. The energy of tomorrow will not be based on the fantasies of yesterday.
theoriginalSkooby 3 years ago
"Another one swiming up the river, goog luck with that"
Everything he wrote above is correct, therefore you tried to insult him instead of defending your bullshit claims. Golly, you cultists are all alike.
Desertphile 3 years ago
One more thing, its not relly energy from nowhere, nobody said that except YOU. There is energy every where around you, call it ether, vril, electrostatic energy, radiant energy, orgon, whatever you want. the fact is that everything around inside you is nothing more than vibrations and your five senses translate that in to this reality, it´s all an illusion and you´re one dude thats really caught in it.
suiris24 3 years ago
"One more thing, its not relly energy from nowhere, nobody said that except YOU."
No, asshole, I did not.
One cannot generate electricity without energy: the idiot in the video I replied to believes otherwise, and you fucktards defened him because you morons. That's the fact: you will just have to adjust your childish emotions to deal with that fact.
Desertphile 3 years ago
Funny but I do not agree with you when you say"it would have already been done".People like you have argued to death that earth was flat,the atom was the smallest particle,you know where I am heading.Over unity,energy from the vacum,magnetic motor,artificial gravity,name it.WILL some day work.There is either YES or NO.And I say yes.Go ahead and say no if you want,you will be like one of those people being taken by a river trying to swim upwards.Our laws of physics need to CHANGE.
suiris24 3 years ago
You are a fucking retard. Thousands of morons are working every weekend to make magic energy from nowhere. Do the Men in Black go door to door stealing their magnets? If you think you can change the laws of physics then you should probably stop thinking altogether.
theoriginalSkooby 3 years ago 2
You are ignorant of whats going on. It's has been done, silly. Watch the following 3 videos found in my, Favorite Video section than come back and correct your statement. But somehow I know you have to much faith in what you know to see the forest for the tree in front of you.
Video#1:
Free Magnetic Engine
Video#2:
Electromagnetic Over Unity Power Plant
Video#3:
Magnet Motor - Search for Free Energy
jamesroney 3 years ago
By the way, when someone talks about getting more energy back than that of what they put into it, is called, over unity.
I noticed that when you challenged the gentleman in the video when this matter came up, you were at a complete loss as to how to "properly" address the issue.
You might want to add, "Over Unity" to your vocabulary, and try and take the high road when people piss you off. Otherwise were no better than the next person when we lower our standards to theirs.
Enjoy the videos.
jamesroney 3 years ago
Idiot. Desertphiole is 100% correct: magnets are not magical.
MakesMeAngry 3 years ago
why'ed you shave your beard?
rjrrules 3 years ago
"why'ed you shave your beard?"
I hate hair on my face--- it sucks royally.
Desertphile 3 years ago
but it hides most of your face... which is a good thing
desertphool 3 years ago
one motor running another. ...ha ha . he is WAYYY back there on the learning curve. LOL
desertblbuesman 3 years ago
Never argue with idiots. They bring you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Debating free energy activists is like debating creationists or muslims or rowing in the Titanic's swimming pool to make it go faster.
isreasontaboo 3 years ago
Science: Pwning ignorant n00bs since 240 BCE.
Killersepp 3 years ago 3
Nikola Tesla did a great deal of work in providing cheap (electrical) power to the masses . Sadly big business appears to have caused him severe difficulties :
v=gt8Y93k0pB0
a sad tale of a great genius
ark1588 3 years ago
Ha do you really think it would have already been done!!! Do you know what would happen to the major oil companies if this would happen!! And Fuck Physics!!! The old standard laws of physics no longer even apply!!! Quantum physics says it is possible!! And it has already been accomplished by Nikola Tesla in the 40's!!!! Shit! Do extensive research before saying something is impossible!! Nothing is impossible!!
XTCinmee 3 years ago
"Ha do you really think it would have already been done!"
If byou are asking a question, you might want to use a "?" instead of a "!" at the end of your sentence.
Yes, if it were not impossible it would already have been done.
Desertphile 3 years ago
Grate looks like he blocked me. I did not do any name calling and was vary nice I thought and he blocked me. I Guess he only wants comments that are in agreement with him. He failed to say that in his video.
LittleTruckingBozo 3 years ago
"Ha do you really think it would have already been done!"
Hee hee! Yeah, you are certainly right. Many othger people have left polite comments, and they have all been deleted. The clown has serious emotional issues, I suppose.
Desertphile 3 years ago
"serious emotional issues"
exactly, now imagine what this would do to a person down on his luck that finally found something that made him happy. And someone not just spoiled it for him (without reason).
but insulted him also,next time just send him here, i'll explain energy transfer.
crob227 3 years ago
It's funny how the anti-scientific creationist nutbags erronously accuse evolution of violating the laws of thermodynamics, and these guys can't see how all forms of "free energy" absolutely do run afoul of the laws of physics. I can't decide which error is more ignorant...
renegade4dio 3 years ago
yes i agree , you use the current you make and it