Added: 5 years ago
From: 1986ttype
Views: 80,482
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (204)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • mustang was blown alright!!!! blown by the OX..GN!!!

  • You can tell the one's that have not rode in a gn . Very small mods and they run in high 12s, spend a grand to 1500 and your in low 12s to high 11s. And yes I know what I am talking about guys. Love driving mine 11.77 on 16lbs of boost. I run 25lb at the track

  • @needboost231 yeah, your right. the gn and the TTA are very bad little cars. my dad had a TTA and it was 11.20 in the 1/4. he let me drive it, scared the hell outa me.

  • wow...and pat the gas pedal on him too?.

  • wow...and pat the gas pedal on him.

  • 16# of boost??? this guy needs a little tuning and alky inj to pust 22-26 psi on pump gas

  • when we people relize racing is from a dead start not a freaking roll

  • i hate how ppl start honking with almost a full car length lead

    doesnt matter anyways cus that piece of shot go shown up

  • FUUCCCKKK!! Now I see why my brother wants a Grand National! 

  • @Vert344 That Buick was sounding like Mel Gibson Mad Max at the end when he mash that gas ..!!!

  • Must have been a blown V6 Mustang, no way a blown GT loses??

  • really "ugly" sound of the gn...love it,sounds like no other

  • The music is crap.

  • NICE

  • That V6 sounds like it was built by Satan himself.... Love the sound of it...The nastiest sounding V6 ever

  • dat shit is crazy bought my 87 wit bolt ons not even close to dat GN

  • the mustang would kick the sh** out of the buick in a real drag race.

  • @runniec highly unlikely

  • @runniec LOL You go fanboy.

  • i hate all dumb fucks that rune racing sounds with gay fucking music.

  • @dicktheguncheney agreed.

  • wow pretty carss

  • This music is fucking terrible. Ruined the damn video.

  • why only 16 lbs of boost?

  • nice.. the GN pulled hard from a roll.

  • that was fucking insane man ahahahahah im weak off this shit!! just after smoking a j and watching this... im fucking tripping bad!! that grand national was fucking insane!!!! sqreeechhhhhhhhhh then goodbye ahahah fucking sound of it... nice looking machine to :)

  • wouldnt that suk ..you just got a 05 stang ..built it a lil bit ..and get killed by a 87 gn .....

  • Good race. Great video. Well done

  • Worst song for an intro ever....

  • Hahahaha, the GN let off and got back on it and still won it...

  • Sounds like a lawn mower. But GN's are crazy fast!

  • grand national is king. v6 is bomb a.f.

  • this mustang is weak. im sorry, but when the gnx was spinning it was STILL walking the mustang down who by the way had a head start. if the mustang is blown, is it a 6 cylinder or is it pushing one pound of boost? i mean seriously, i looked a good 3 times and i do not see the gnx pulling hard, nor do i hear anything from the mustang

  • Hey if you lose to a Grand National you seriously have NOTHING to be ashamed of. Nobody should bash the Stang. GNs are insane.

  • evrybody knew the outcome of that one ...lol my dad kills newer mustangs in his 10 sec gn all the time ... it runs 30 lb of boost on a 70 mm turbo .with meth.

  • great video, but here's a pro-tip... when cars are wot... turn the music out level DOWN... the song is so loud man. otherwise w/o music it's perfect.

  • wow, spun, pedal`d, and still beat.

    awesome

  • that GN boned out

  • the gn also has one of the best tannys ever made the 2004r , when you take the flaws out of the tranny , you can put it behind any rat and it can live well. also it takes lots less hp to turn the trans , unlike the legendary th-400

  • BLACKSHEEPc10: The 2004-R trans is basically a Turbo 350 with OD.

  • Just goes to show that you don't need a lot of boost the make a vehicle go. My GN is 14lbs from the factory and I still kick ass. The only way the guy in the Mustang will beat a GN is to go out and buy a GN.

  • @walkerscranger im a ford guy but that thing you said was pretty funny

  • the gn was THE muscle car of its time. that was sick.

  • @vermt001 Monte carlo chevelle charger

    what about thse

  • @saltyCracka3 the grand national came out after the days when your examples were out of there prime. They dropped the hp to keep insurance rates down and meet emission requirements and rising gas prices of the time The grand national gets around that with a turbo'd v6. A lot like today with the ford taurus sho

  • @vermt001 - actually the Regal T-Type was the low insurance sleeper compared to the Grand National.

  • @vermt001 Maybe. I was there in the 80's with my 5.0 FOX, and I hung with GN's pretty well. We all had FOX's and with basic mods, they could hang no problem.

  • @vermt001

    And even still these days it could put most to shame

  • @vermt001 + did you know it only had a v6 but it had a turbo charger and the right connection and yea it wwas the muscle car of its time

  • 16lbs is it? That thing needed some race gas or meth! Thing still ran strong for only 16lbs

  • daily drive that gn!!!!

     sounds reliable!!!! my gn had to be rebuilt every 30k!

    thats why i no longer have it!

  • You must have put inferior parts on it then.

    165k and replaced the turbo and rope seals and that is it.

  • dude in the stang dont kno how to race he tryd staying ahead ...dats why wen that gn hit boost and was spinin past his ass hahahahha

  • that's awesome how the GN driver had to lift because it lost traction while rolling!

  • ...and still won

  • I sold my 87GN about 5 years ago. It was a monster but I hardly ever drove it. 110 octane turbo blue was expensive but that's not why I sold mine. I got sick of all the morons in their mustangs and vettes wanting to race.

  • @EviLNox8 because its a good contender and most gn's are modded in some way, if i was rolling up to a gn i'd try to race him too

  • noyhing like a gn

  • Watch the exhaust manifold on the Buick.

  • Gotta love the Buick v6 only one exhaust note sounds like that!!! Mustang tastes like chicken

  • I agree, Never heard a blown Mustang so quiet

  • for a blown mustang...it was really quiet

  • is that mars volta playin in the background?? awesome band!

  • GN sounded great...and for 16lbs of boost..still walked the Ford.. lol

  • they push a little over 16lbs of boost on the stock turbo. my dad has a stock 87 regal t (same car as a gn, just a different name) and i raced some year of the lt1 camaros and spanked it..long live the turbo 3.8

  • that GN sounded horrible....they usually do, and the mustang held up pretty good

  • it only had 16 pound of boost lol my friends gn has 32 pounds of boost a 9 sec car.

  • lol well this one is stock 16....

  • no...the mustang is fast as shit....thats just one beast ass grand national.

  • They are all beasts.

  • That's one weak Mustang....

  • the gn sounds very cool from that mustang

  • Im not biased i just know it takes a shit ton of money to make a ford run fast and stay together and 90% of mustang owners are assholes and have a chip on their shoulder i can appreciate any fast car as long as the owner isnt a dickhead!!!

  • Lame music.. other-wise...cool.

  • Buick FTW

  • grand national gnx all the way

  • 16lbs of boost and Ford ownage..gotta love it.

    What combo in the GN?

  • Goooo Buick! :D

  • Look the only reason your gn fell apart kiloman is cause you owned it im glad you bought a ford any retard can take and put an h pipe flows and a nitrous kit on a mustang and think it fast it takes some brains to make a gn run and it will stay together..unlike the ford you push it hard and you end up a member of the i drove over my crankshaft and almost killed myself then to walk home club..ford backwards Driver Returns On Foot....

  • So there's no such thing as a fast ford? I can appreciate GN's and GNX's are fast but you make driving a Ford sound like its a damn Hon-duh. Typical car guy you are biased towards whatever you drive.

  • some fords are the shit but my monte carlo could take way more of a beating. you just have to get the right one. my mustang fell apart but now I have a 96 ford thunderbird now its a 4.6 pi supercharged and I love it I could beat the fuck out of it without worry of service every 10 miles.

  • another ass sucking ford retard. i bet if i pulled up with a title you wouldnt have the balls to put yours up kiloman2

  • Yeah i had a grand national and it was a piece a crap.

  • you're the only person in gn history to make such an asinine comment. mine was so ridiculously fast I blew away built muscle cars and mine was bone stock right from the factory I sold it when I get married now I'm divorced. how fuckin dumb was i!

  • They are chevrolet cars wich means they are shit. I wanted to buy 1 cause it was old and it had a turbo and to me it was cool but then it kept breaking and shit (power windows motors, transmission sensor, everything kept breaking on me.) So i got rid of that crap and bought me a Mustang!

  • your sir are a fucking ass clown!!

  • Learn how to spell.

  • Kilo obvoiusly you got a defect GN, doesnt mean their crap. If you look at the defect records between Buicks Regals/GNs and Ford Mustangs, you'll see the Ford has a huge reputation of bad reliability. I would suggest u to keep your comments to yourself. Every car manufactor has a defect every now and then, but Ford probably has the worst!.

  • not much can be said about a company who recalls an entire line of cars eh?

    (focus)

  • Xeronicus im sorry but what were you trying to say?

  • I'm saying that i have never in my lifetime seen a company recall an ENTIRE vehicle line for a Faulty internal component. They use cheap parts, therefor i do not trust them one iota...that and i have never had a ford vehicle that worked well for me. I will never drive a newer ford again, not after all the issues my F150 had new from the lot.

    Crank walk anyone?

    Though a 1972 mustang grande would be nice or even a 2003 terminator with a kenne bell, because they are bad ass and sound like satan

  • Have you seen a new GM vehicle lately? Their interiors have become cheap garbage, their new engines suck, their transmissions that they tried to make a "tiptronic" shift on demand system blows ass. Face it man the days of a quality GM is gone. Ford on the other hand has improved its quality in the last 10 years.

  • i just bought an 09 sierra and it seems to be doing pretty good =p lol

  • god damn mustangs are pieces of shit. its a ford f150 with a god damn coupe body slapped onto it.

  • hey not all mustangs are pieces of shit!

  • Wtf bitch u don't know shit mustangs are the best. Yeah theyre motors are so good, they used them for f150's cause they haul ass!! Bitch

  • can anybody tell me who made this song? i would like to know!

  • before any other piece of shit cars were made there was ford......1893 till present..everyone else followed.

  • Amen to that.

  • Buicks GN's Rule!! Saw one on Auto Trader asking price 200k w/ 60 miles on it.

  • awful song

    newb

  • No one realizes how fast the gnxs are, 4.6 to 60 stock, insane car in 1987.

  • evilmetaltwin, its actually F.ucked O.n R.ace D.ay, but valiant effort.

    dont get me wrong ford fanboys, there is no car i would rather have than a GT500

  • v6 talkin shit

  • ford = F.uckers O.nly R.un D.ownhill, sorry i had to say it

  • I never realized how horrible GN's exhaust tone were. Still awesome cars no doubt.

  • the guy prolly has a dump pipe. gn with muffs sound nice and smooth

  • Good point, that is a possibility I didnt consider.

  • GN's sound mean when you run E85 in them turbo cars love the cooler intake charge associated with E85 and the 108 ocyane isnt bad either

  • Actually the GNX and the GN engines were not the same. The GNX had more power, different turbo, some other engine mods that I can remember right now, and different rear suspension. Stock GN's were a low 14 second car. GNX's were a low 13 second car if you could hook them up.

  • I dont know who said a stock GNX ran 12s stock but thats incorrect. Boostnitup is right. Grannys were low to mid 14 second cars. All The GNX was a GN with fender flares, specific goodyear tires, and monotube shocks! THATS it. Exact same engine

  • The buick GN and GNX are actually two different engines the GNX was designed by McLarren Motor Sport for Generral Motors Corp., it featured a full portmatch and polish bigger turbo ceramic heat treated headers computer work, and a finned GNX diff. cover and was a whole 207lbs lighter than a regular GN.(owner 87 GN & #247 Registered GNX)

  • There's more to the GNX than what you stated. They had a modded trans, bracing, slightly different chip and some traction aids, and then there was also the different gauges/cluster and some other stuff I can't think of.

  • The 1987 T-Type was putting down 13.8's on a cold day.

    Reality is most of the Turbo Buicks were in the 14.2 to 14.5 range after reaching operational temps.

    The GNX was a specialty offering. 547 were made. Better grab up a GNX if you have the money. They will only go up in value... as will the remaining GN's and T-Types.

  • Forget it ... Mustangs need not challenge any turbo regal out there..........Gn is clearly in the 11's At 20psi would be in the 10's ....

  • i love that song!!! cars sucked though!

  • as far as trucks go, let help u out, dodge srt 10 knock the lighting out of the spot for fastest production pick up, chevy is no the best selling pick up now. so yeah basically fu%k ford

  • 1.bigorangetrucker have u even the new camaros. i went to the l.a. auto show last weekend and it got a positive reaction as far as woomping it, good luck with that cause they got an ls2 motor.

  • slowstang got smoked as usual??? According to utube, stangs get their asses kicked. But if a stang owner put a vid on youtube for a every ricer hes whupped?? Well you see where im going with this.......

    IMO, 2004 and up are too heavy to be greatly affected by a blower, stick with an 89 blown 5.0L and thats where the money is :)

  • 16lbs is very low for a GN.  Must have been running 93 octane.

  • yeah 16lbs aint much i mean i run 17.5 and im on 93 in my t-type...but i also built it to run good on 93

  • GN>Mustang. The GNX was a limited edition GN which was a limited edition Regal. Buick knew they wouldn't be making them forever and hence they're small build nembers. I think its impressive for an 80s turbo V6 to be woopin on a '05 blown GT Mustang.

  • Ford always outsold the f-bodys because thats all they ever offered as far as a sporty 2 door coupe was concerned. Everytime they tried to sell something else, it was cancelled. Hell, the T-Bird was supposed to be the answer to the Corvette. That was a joke. Where's it at now? It's been cancelled twice. The Cougar was supposed to be another ponycar. That really lasted. It's come and gone twice now too, with its last iteration being a 4 cyl/V6 FWD layout. The Ford GT(40) came and went twice too.

  • Buick power!!!

  • chevy 4 life fuck those asshole workers

  • a46209 i hate to tell you this but the camaro is coming back in 2009 so expect to see alot of used mustangs in the future

  • I doubt Ford people are gonna swap for chev. The built quality on the new comaros is rummored to be less than anticipated. Im a Ford guy, but personally I cant wait to get my hands on a new Challenger SRT-8 when they come out. It will woomp a comaro any day of the week.

  • agreed. Simply put, all SRT-8's are BADASS

  • LOL slowstang got smoked as usual............

  • Racing from a roll... LAME Congrats on the GN. It probably would have been a worse outcome from a dig... Oh... and I own a '92 Ford LX with 432W and a 1984 Grand National... so no bias on my end...

  • lol thats what I was thinking imagine what the GN would have done from a dig if it could hook up.

  • hey nascarfan... hate to break it too ya, but it prolly was stock, i mean factory turbo, the gn were vette killers

  • I have a 89 turbo trans am i'v beat plenty of mustangs and trans ams.

  • and to you idiots arguing over the damn motors. ford has some great motors, ford has some shitty motors. chevy has some great motors, chevy has some shitty motors. chrysler has some great motors too, shut the fuck up already.

  • theres no way that mustang was blown. and if it is, the GN is NOT stock at all.

  • Well you could definatly tell the gn was not stock by just looking in the engine compartment at 0:27

  • no thats what the enines look like when stock...that one was just really shinny i know i have one

  • i love those grand nationals, faster than hell too. Too bad they really sound like shit.

  • Are you retarded? Yep.

  • bye bye mustang, i see why you got a half a car start.

  • ford or gm who cares as long as it isn't another bs import

  • That rustang did not have a chance, and the Buick was running basically stock Boost 16 lbs, Ha.

  • I love this video, gn laid tire until he let off, got back on it, and still beat the stang 8-)

  • GNs are ugly as fuck...but credit where credit is due...not exactly a stomping, though

  • damn!

  • gn's are bomb ass.

  • OWNERSHIP

  • NICE KILL THE PONIES

  • I hope to own one soon!

  • GNs are getting even more rare. I owned a turbo T and gave it up 6-years ago. On the straights it was unmatched, but the car took too much abuse.

  • Mustangs cant hang with GN's

  • ya ok mustangs cant hang? youre an idiot,,, no really, i think you might be,,, no im wrong,, you are

  • you're an idiot. a GN will blow any mustang away any day anywhere.

  • Are you on crack. The GN beat this stang but he won't beat every stang.

  • typical ford owner. the GNs in general, same amount of work into them; will rape the mustang with same work.

  • See now we are talking modified. Your original statement was that a GN will blow any stang away. I have yet to see one outrun an S351 or an S281 Extreme or an 03-04 Cobra or even a new Shelby GT500. Show me videos of that and I will agree with you.

  • Looks like the Mustang had almost a car length head start and still got his ass handed to him.

  • And why did you reply to my statement? I saw the video. I wasn't talking about the particular race in this video.

  • Until we see a video when a GN looses to a Cobra or a Shelby or any Mustang that Im not putting down then your statement has been made. Im just a proud owner of an 86 GN and I enjoy GN victory.

  • You probably won't see a video of a GN racing a Cobra or Shelby because it won't be a race. No GN model has ran 12's stock which is what the 03 and up Cobra's run. If you want proof then go find an 03-04 Cobra or a new Shelby GT500 and let them show you want a Stang's rear bumper looks like.

  • Ok Ray, I give up! I did'nt have a clue they ran that fast stock.

  • I guess i did'nt pay attention to your last statement, I know what a Mustangs bumper looks like, I have a body and paint shop. Dont assume any of those Mustangs would pass me by personally, my GN is'nt stock, ran my best 10.89 @ 128. My videos will be posted soon. Stock vs. Stock you may have a point.

  • Yeah that is the only point I was trying to get across. I know a modded GN is nothing to play with. I only have one friend that has a stang that will run with your GN. He has a 91 LX with a 331 Stroker and spraying a 180 shot. He averages 11.50's on motor and 10.40's on spray.

  • Thats a fast Mustang, one of my favorite generation for Mustangs.

  • I agree. I don't really like the new body styles. I think Ford is moving in the wrong direction. They are making them larger and heavier. That was the problem with the early 70's models.

  • dude your talking about an 86 GN keeping up with a 2000-2007 stangs..stangs are weak period...

  • Well I will make this statement. The "Weak" Mustang has outlasted the badass Camaros and Firebirds and the badass Grand Nationals so obviously millions of people disagree with you.

  • im not talkng about out lasting...im talking about weak (slow) and yeah i would agree with u on that, they have outlasted them. but GM still made stronger engines then ford ever did!

  • GM quit making GN's and Camaros and Firebirds because they want the Corvette to be the glory car, and when any of the GM high performance cars, such as the Z28, Trans AM or Grand National start looking like they can dominate the Corvette for less GM pulls the plug. You gotta love GM.

  • Hate to burst your bubble but the Camaro and Trans Am was discontinued because GM was losing money on them not because they were afraid of it competing with their flagship car. As for the GN I will admit it was a badass car for its time but a lot of people are making it sound more badass than it really was.

  • Ok that makes so sense. So now you're going to tell me they now have plans to bring back a car that they were losing money on? Also a GN can still run 10's-11's in the 1/4 with added boost and fuel still after 20 years while being docile enough to drive to the track w/o having to gas up every other day. So I don't know what you want to make of that.

  • They are bring back the Camaro because they see Ford making money by using the nostalgia look on the Mustangs. Why do you think the new Camaro favors the Camaros of the 60s and 70s. If you don't believe me then look up the reason GM discontinued them. As for your badass GN I know of a few SVO Mustangs with 4 cylinders and a turbo that are running 9's and used as a daily driver. And those were mid 80's cars.

  • And there's also GN's that run 8's in the 1/4 on the stock block. I've only seen one SVO, yes it ran 9's, and a shit load of boost too. Impressive, of course the fox body Mustang does weigh less than a GN. And GM is trying to copy the Mustang, it will probably flop, like the T bird.

  • I will give you that, I don't know what the hell Ford was thinking with the thunderbird so I will just say it was a brain fart. So instead of turning this into an argument I will concede that the GN was a badass vehicle for its time.

  • Also what you don't understand is that any car company can build a specialty car for a couple of years that is badass. Buick built the Grand National for a couple of years, Ford has been building Mustangs since 1964. Even the mighty Corvette was pretty crappy until 1998.

  • obviously u dont know GM the vette has been strong since the 80's....mustangs has been making them since 1964 but still cant beat a camaro or trans am...what did mustangs come with back then 289's when trans am's and maro's started with 400 ci engines then some 70's trans am's came with the 455sd pushing 560+ hp

  • Obviously you don't know GM. Yeah the mustangs started with 289's and so forth but the Corvette started in 1953 with 6 cylinders. As for Ford making weak motors I would put a Ford 429SCJ against any 400 or 454 from GM.

  • That 429, I would be afraid to run against that with my GN.

  • this is my point here...ford sucks on making engines...when have u seen a camaro or trans am with a ford engine>? NEVER....a mustang with a GM engine>? plenty of times!!! lol...ford sucks ass man, admit it...

  • What kind of rear end does most Chevy drag cars have? The Ford 9". Just because people put chevy motors in Ford bodies doesn't mean Ford doesn't make good motors. Besides I haven't seen a stock Camaro or Trans Am that could outrun a 2000 Cobra R or even the 2003 and up Cobras. Do the research.

  • ive never seen those cobras beat those zo6 out there fucking cobras gotta have those superchargers, without them they arent shit...when GM runs their cars all motor..whats up with that...???????? and whats up with those GT's out there...they are fucking slow, their piece of shit..the daddy of this shit is the vette...admit it...oh and about the rear end, im talking about engines morron!!