Added: 10 months ago
From: Culturealimprovement
Views: 820
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Ankheru i didnt flag this. someone else did.

  • Thanks for your constructive comments. I really don't want to be overly critical of his mathematical ability. It's just a little dissapointing to see basic errors like this on what is on the whole a commendable piece of work. On a more positive note, I find his presentation of the material both excellent and enjoyable to watch.

  • At 7:54 you can't give an answer accurate to 8 decimal places when your calculation contains a measured value accurate to only 6 decimal places. The answer should be given to 6 decimal places or less.

  • @feynmanrich At 7:54 he gives more decimals in the answer because he himself calculated it the other way, and he presents the proof in the video. He is smart but not properly educated.

  • At 9:05 2pi squared divided by 2pi cubed does not equal 0.159154943. Also, dividing this equation by 2pi gives 1 over 2pi squared, not 2pi squared.

  • @feynmanrich Niuce you spotted errors. Thank you. To correct Carl Munck you must contact him through thepyramidmatrix. I have found he often uses the division-symbol when it should be other symbols. And he does not use parentheses properly. But the formula on 9:05 still makes no sense.

  • @feynmanrich i got it. Its the reciprocal of double pi. It comes up in many other computations in geometry. To get the reciprocal of a fraction, just the fraction. For example, the reciprocal of 3/4 is 4/3. The reciprocal of 1/5 is 5/1 or just plain 5.

  • Comment removed

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more