I'm sorry but inside line know nothing about how to test cars. they do these stupid tests instead of testing the car to see its feel on the public roads. all these stats are meaningless. and then they test luxury saloons like the 535i on a track? who the f is gna buy that to drive on a track?!
Do you actually believe that a C230 Kompresor with 201 HP V6, no navigational screen, no touch screen, no blue tooth technology, basically nothing with a 1982 engine actually was on sale for $32,000?? Mercedes is so embarrassing its not even funny.
@AZ37DD the E-class and 5-series are mid-size cars. The 7-series and S-class are classifies as LWB. Cadillac designed the CTS to compete in the entry-level luxury segment, and it designed the STS to compete in the luxury mid-size segment. If anyone did a comparison of a v6 CTS, they would not compare it to a six cylinder 5 series, they would compare it to a six cylinder 3-series.
@Arai4lpinestars Good for you; enjoy getting bent over at the shop for about $700+ for a lousy BMW or Benz brake job. My best friend has an E350 and he just had the brakes done for $900 - no lie. At least Cadillac and Lincoln charge respectable fees for service and American cars are more reliable than both German and Japanese marks as a whole according to the latest JD Power. Yes, even more reliablke than the Japanese: flush that myth down the toilet you constipated fool.
uncleflaco you are clearly a dumb cunt and dont know the first thing about quality. 1stly a Toyota is a far better car than your POS cadillac and secondly, how dare you compare an american car to a amg mercedes. clearly have never been near a c63 champ.
mate ur the stupid 1, yes i totally agree with u that the C63 is an amazing car but trying to compare the C63 to a cadillac CTS-V is stupid. There both incredible cars but its american muscle that always wins in the end, just because its AMG doesnt mean its the best and its clearly not!
Handles better? On normal road you will never have chance to notice that small difference between those cars, unless you are crazy behind the wheels. In normal daily life the C63 will be much more fun because of its power !
stock E55 lose against c 63 amg.. m3 will also lose against the c 63 amg... the c 3 amg is an awesome car. the sound is brutality. the acceleration is awesome. 4.5 sec from 0 to 100 km/h. 0,3 sec faster than the m3
obviously you dont know anything about how engines work...the horsepower output is not linearly rellated to the capacity of the engine..plus in this case the 6.2L engine is tuned down in the C63 as it can produce 525bhp in the E63 AMG and 563bhp in the SLS.
Now if you want to state that the M3 has a better V8 engine than C63 that depends on how you compare these two engines in terms of capacity vs output the M3's engine is better but in terms of power output and torque the C63 is way better
engine in c63 has nothing to do with the one in the sls except cylinder block .. every thing from the injectors tot the camshaft is diferent .. its not a software change.. and engine capacity has a lot to do with power .. even more in NA engines like those.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
you can buy a C6 z06 vette used for under 50k... And beat the living piss out of this thing in EVERY category. NOT to mention the new cadillac CTS-V with 550hp runs to 60 in 3.8 secs. Q mile in 11.8... Get it right dumbass... Can't beat AMERICAN MADE!!!
@zxcv123123 actually the C63 is in the same car class as the CTS-V, but journalists just compare the CTS-V to the M5 because of its output. A true competitor to the M5 would be a STS-V in terms of car segment
You know we are biased toward our piece of craps. So get over it. I enjoy my car because it is cheap to maintain runs forever when maintained and runs circles around most cars out there. Mercedes are overpriced and when they break they are expensive to repair. They do break just as much as any other car. I used to work on all makes of cars. So I can speak from experience. Do you even own a Mercedes or are you just dreaming of one for some reason and defending the crap out of them? Just curious.
I think I'll go with 5999cc here CTS V(s) are the current fastest four door sedans ... hands down... and will beat any stock 4door from Europe, Japan, Korea or China ... and guess what it was built in the USA...
I was just wondering, but you know, the mercedes c63 amg is lighter about 300-500kg than cls 6,3 and cl 6,3 amg. that's why it's faster. But know the question is, whether c63 is faster going from 100km/h to 200km/h. because when you go on such speeds, it's the question of engine and "horses" that you have. I don't think that the mass of the car is the most important thing in this case.
The acceleration of an object as produced by a net force is directly proportional to the magnitude of the net force, in the same direction as the net force, and inversely proportional to the mass of the object.
a = F(net) / m
In other words for acceleration 2 things are important.
Russia has the largest population of billionaires in the world, of course they launched the new 7 there. Americans only buy American & Japanese cars, thats where Lexus shines. But for the financially elite, not so much.
Oh, the Ford CEO rides around in a Lexus? That's funny because that ass-wipe let Ford nearly go bankrupt, that shows how much of a dumbass he is. You two share the same trait. Get a real opinion and then come back. Fucking children.
No it's not. Western Europe is. The United States is second, and getting smaller because of the economic crisis. BMW launched the new 7 in Russia to expand into the Eastern European market.
Sorry, but the 63 AMG is the strongest Mercedes has claimed it is the world's most powerful naturally-aspirated V8 engine!!! No GM naturally asoirated engine is stronger then that.
Also that 5,4 L engine in SLR GT produces 680 HP and there is no GM Model that can even be close to pure European V8 POWER.
Ever hear of the current Corvette z06 and the, GM's sister company in down under, the Holden Commodore HSV 427. It has 505 HP naturally aspirated. If you can't beat naturally aspirated, GM made V6 turbos that made way more power than any Euro V8, V12, etc. Buick GNX motors made 1000 horsepower out of a 3.8 liter turbo V6 back in the late 80's. Maybe before your time. Not sure.
@player1vladimir The 1.5l your speaking of was based on the M10. It put out about 1300hp in qualifying, but ran about 850-900hp most of the time. This is a racecar engine. Its easy to pump out insane hp/l numbers when you have insane amounts of money and the engine only needs to last a few races.
Here we have a saying it says God drives a Mercedes. Well that means that Mercedes is the best and there is no one who can say something agaisnt that. :)
you know in my country, or in most african countries....the president is always driven in a merc, and bmw's and audi's and other cars are for the prime ministers and other ministers. mercedes' are high class cars not just for anyone.
GT-R is fast, very fast. But if something goes wrong with its electronics, I bet the car wouldnt even take a corner properly or start. Who knows what might happen in an accident. A Porsche is still more technical and safe.
I'm sorry. But the Henessey isn't a 4 door. And it already been tuned to it's max. If Brabus decide to tune a SL65 AMG Black, it will be much better than a Henessey.
As far as I know henessey does not come in caddys does it now ;-) Companies like AMG, Brabus,SVT,Saleen,Shelby ..etc are working directly with the manufacturer and are producing a car that is no different then a SVT Cobra(SVT specialty vehicle team)
I gave you an answer to your question ,I gave you a 4 door car that is faster WAY WAY faster then your granny caddy ;-)
Please do not change the subjecxt! Gotta think realy hard before posting something so ownage like this can be prevented son !
Dont try to twist shit around moron!You said QUOTE"CTS-V is the fastest 4 door"you can go back to the previous post and read it yourself if you dont belive me..or do you have altsheimers and forget sht all the time?
I gave you 2 cars that are faster then your caddy!2 of them,not 1 but 2,you said fastest 4 door ,I proved you wrong now you try to bring the child out in you by saying it cost more..well go cry to ya mother..you child !
You talk about stock cars...what is your defenition of a stock car, an SRT-4 comes turbocharged STOCK so does the 3000GT VR-4 ,the 2003-04 Cobra comes Supercharged...does that mean they come stock or tuned ..hmmmmmmm
Can you see the point you stupid fuk ?
You don't have an argument with me you moron what is your definition of a stock car you stupid fuk? We were arguing about a faster and better car that is a 4 door , I gave you 2 of them you fuk, not one but 2 ;)
Fukin kids these days...wow...that little 5999cc moron...what a joke...he must be a real american bread REDNECK...Like caddy is was ever a compatable sports car...hahahah thinking if they take the ZR1 engine put it in a caddy they are going to give the europeans some competition..hahahahhahahah
WELL KID DID YOU DO YOUR RESEARCH ON THE ROCKET AND HURRICANE ? IF NOT DO SO AND THEN SHUT THE HELL UP DONT COME UP WITH SOME BS I GAVE YOU A BETTER AND FASTER 4 DOOR CAR YOU STUPID FUK ;-)
Isn't it passed your bed time son? It's very late and you are still up....Well since you want to talk cars, let's talk cars, now son remember after this please go to bed and get some fkn sleep!
Your caddy is the big number 1 you think ha? heheheheheh well how about some BRABUS ROCKET in your life or if you are not into rockets how about some fkn G Power Hurricane??? heheheh You stupid fuk! Both of these cars would EAT,DIGEST AND SHT OUT YOUR CADDY !
Take the CTS-V and compare it to An SL 65AMG or the new series M5 comming out in 2010 or the Hurrican version or any other car out there that can Eat, digest and sht out the caddy any day any track all day long baby....get your facts straight kid !
Some people like the less attractive car, or the less atractive girl...or ...they cannot afford the car....or they cannot get the good looking girl ;-)
more fun to drive? the GT-R has no exhaust note, and has no manual gearbox...you're pathetic...if youre so confident, why do you search Mercedes vidoes?
READ THIS COMMENT, IT IS THE LAST ONE I WILL WASTE ON YOU. no matter what i say, you call porsche inferior to the gt-r, a porsche is more fun, deal with it. you are wasting your life trying to make a cheap complicated uncommunitave car look as good as the ultimate sportscar, you life must have taken a bad turn somewhere with this commitment, seek mental help, before you post some kinda of proof the bad in your life has been put behind you and you can live normal and sane i will comment back.
european companies build the best cars they can build, they make 600 bhp SPORTS CARS that you can drive everyday and get some badge with using the noise and looks. you are being racist by saying it has a soul because its not german and ignoring that its a complex awd that has limited driver communication and a subtle exhaust note on track, a corvette, viper or nsx would also be fun, you are being racist against germany because a single sports car from japan is not as fun to drive... leave
please, i currently have a 1987 suzuki gsxr 750. you are PREJIDUCED against europe! you call anyone who likes a loud fun to drive car a badgewhore and tell them to drive an awd computer. you should not leave any comments from now on, you are trying to stimulate japanese and american sales, but trust me you are making a fool out of all of those companies. they build cars with good suspension and powerful engines with not much else but the europeans don't stop there! they spend extra 100,000s!
you think a 911, a true sports car with a soul is fair to compare to a car that doesn't roar, goes around a track with flappy paddles, awd, uses technology to sip away driving fun etc. the gt-r is nothing that can compare to a 911, theres no comparision, no substitute! you can't replace a 911, it doesn't matter what the best time tochio suzuki got after driving around the nurburgring in the same car over 150 times, porsche is better! they are bargains in comparision to a gt-r!
please stop trying to undermine the german cars, mercedes invented the car, porsche designed the "people's car", and they have engineered nearly every major breakthrough in the world of automobiles, that sat nav, abs, massage etc. in your lexus was created by mercedes. they build the best engines, they have the highest quality build (as of 2008), and trust me, no driving experience will ever match the 911, with rear mounted race bred engine and the sheer track experience.
please stop being racist against europe, the nuts and bolts in many jap cars and bikes are like marshmallows, same problem with vettes, they can be hugely capable on a track but on some the quality is awful. and you asked to bring up a time merc was more reliable than lexus, have you seen an old toyota, amazing anyone can bring themselves to drive them. honda builds good engines and good cars but there just not as good as a german car, they simply have more passion.
lol, its not like a mercedes taxi from the 1970s hasn't lasted 3 million miles or anything, well only 2.8 mil, only a lexus away from 3 million. btw test have shown that in an s klasse your heart rate it 5-6 bpms lower than in an ls (cruising). without merc there wouldnt be cars! also no abs brakes, massage, sat nav, digital tv in car etc. they were the first to all of those, they are ahead of everybody, go drive your lexus with its marshmallow build.
I have to give credit were to the C63-AMG, but then again I can't help but notice that the M5 is bigger and still did nearly as good as the Mec, and the same goes for the CTS-V. This is just me, but I think I would still pay the extra $2k for the CTS-V, but that being said I'm also a huge fan of the tunability and simplicity of the LS series of engines. It would be awsome to see all three of these cars face off at the same track and same time though.
ford has never talk about bankruptcy read the news people they only need help if gm or chrysler go down the money they r taking is just for a back up again read the news call me a fanboy all you want... lexus is ok i like mercedes better way better looking cars
Every "first drive" video of the C63 that i've seen mentions how communicative, confidence-inspiring, and great the steering and handling of the car is. Infact, in the most recent comparison test against the 2008 BMW M5 & 2009 Cadillac CTS-V, the C63 was rated first in overall driving dynamics, fun-to-drive, handling, and steering performance. So, to describe the handling,"isn't the greatest" wouldn't be the right way to describe it, & even saying it's "good" is definitely an understatement
Top Gear. They none of them, including "the stig" could hit the apex with the car. On road it may have good dynamics, and good feel, but when pushed to the limits on a track it doesnt hold up. Obviously not many people will be taking it on a track to test limits, but thats not the point.
well, when inside line compared those cars, they said they were comparing the best sport sedans out there (i don't know why the m3 wasn't in there), & a large portion of the comparison took place on track. It was commented on rotating its nose towards the apex better than the 2008 M5 or 2009 CTS-V. So this car definitely holds up, on and off the track, but, when its handling is compared to the M3's, that's where the line is drawn. & i would take insideline's word for it before I took Top Gear's
0-60 in 4.5 seconds with no wheelspin.
lfsracer79 6 months ago
I'm sorry but inside line know nothing about how to test cars. they do these stupid tests instead of testing the car to see its feel on the public roads. all these stats are meaningless. and then they test luxury saloons like the 535i on a track? who the f is gna buy that to drive on a track?!
Scudeyyy 7 months ago
whoa. thats a quick quarter mile
rocketballa4life 7 months ago
17 dislike is from the mendling m3 fanboys
EVERLIVERPOOL 8 months ago
@EVERLIVERPOOL shhh
ambientflier 7 months ago
i love mercs fuck beema and audis there full of shit u dont get any fun in those car but in a merc it just makes u smile :)
B16SAF 8 months ago
dont fuck wid mercs my favourite cars of all times fuck beema and audis amg will the c63 will tickle the beeema and audi anydaY OF THE WEEK LOL
B16SAF 8 months ago
car and driver review got the exact same car to do 0-60 in 3.9sec and 1/4 mile in 12 second flat
maybe its the Condition, and a better surface, or maybe better drivers somehow... although its an automatic
this car is a torque monster nonetheless !!!
thumbs up so everybody see the beast numbers in car and driver written review!!
Verification11 11 months ago
Do you actually believe that a C230 Kompresor with 201 HP V6, no navigational screen, no touch screen, no blue tooth technology, basically nothing with a 1982 engine actually was on sale for $32,000?? Mercedes is so embarrassing its not even funny.
heartlessvietboy 1 year ago
@AZ37DD the E-class and 5-series are mid-size cars. The 7-series and S-class are classifies as LWB. Cadillac designed the CTS to compete in the entry-level luxury segment, and it designed the STS to compete in the luxury mid-size segment. If anyone did a comparison of a v6 CTS, they would not compare it to a six cylinder 5 series, they would compare it to a six cylinder 3-series.
timmy23apsb 1 year ago
orgasm for the ears :)
4MATICbenz 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
M3 is better!
thunderboard2010 1 year ago
pullin' on the TRAIN at 0:40
99Silverado53 1 year ago
Mercedes Benz have done it all first and best...two cars in this world....Mercedes Benz and the rest.
BillDFC 1 year ago 8
@BillDFC u mean Mercedes Benz and junk
tanga40 1 year ago
LISTEN TO ENGINE SOUND? GREAT
batbat0 1 year ago 5
MERCEDES-BENZ
NOT LIKE ANY ONE
batbat0 1 year ago
Who needs anymore power than this???
ThousanWhite 1 year ago
that was a slow take off.
seanisagamer 1 year ago
German Muscle <3
Can't go wrong with the Mercedes-Benz E63, its the fastest road muscle car in the world right now.
10020113001 1 year ago
Another thing, Cadillac tuned the cts-v in germane
luxurykid666 1 year ago
The american cars may be faster on paper but you can't beat German engineering and quality. You get what you pay fora
luxurykid666 1 year ago
I'll take German engineering over American muscle
Arai4lpinestars 1 year ago
@Arai4lpinestars Good for you; enjoy getting bent over at the shop for about $700+ for a lousy BMW or Benz brake job. My best friend has an E350 and he just had the brakes done for $900 - no lie. At least Cadillac and Lincoln charge respectable fees for service and American cars are more reliable than both German and Japanese marks as a whole according to the latest JD Power. Yes, even more reliablke than the Japanese: flush that myth down the toilet you constipated fool.
uncleflaco 1 year ago
The caddy has over 100BHP more than the C63 and is supercharged...that's not a fair fight is it? At least use the E55 AMG or something....
Although i'd love to see a comparison test between the CTS-V and the new 800BHP Brabus E V12
jml8841 1 year ago
mercedes benz does it cheaply and poor quiality build. never a benz for me. overpriced piece of crap with no luxury feet room
UFCextra 1 year ago
i have bitches
4jiggy1 1 year ago
uncleflaco you are clearly a dumb cunt and dont know the first thing about quality. 1stly a Toyota is a far better car than your POS cadillac and secondly, how dare you compare an american car to a amg mercedes. clearly have never been near a c63 champ.
laceitaliano 2 years ago
mate ur the stupid 1, yes i totally agree with u that the C63 is an amazing car but trying to compare the C63 to a cadillac CTS-V is stupid. There both incredible cars but its american muscle that always wins in the end, just because its AMG doesnt mean its the best and its clearly not!
bloodyterrific 2 years ago
Ever sat inside a C-class? Compleet POS that I'd expect from Toyota or Hyundai. The Cadillac CTS-V is much nicer and looks way meaner.
uncleflaco 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
disapointed in the quarter time.. thing should be way faster then that for the money. my $4k foxbody would mop the floor with that thing :]
still a sweet ride though
muscleatsrice 2 years ago
Comment removed
muscleatsrice 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
mercedes.. if you want to step out of the car i can probably fuck you up. Embarassing cars i would be humiliated to be seen in a benz
cky94066 2 years ago
id rather take a m3 better looks and handles better i think...
Storsy3 2 years ago
Handles better? On normal road you will never have chance to notice that small difference between those cars, unless you are crazy behind the wheels. In normal daily life the C63 will be much more fun because of its power !
rhoydal 2 years ago
It does handle better ;)
justincrap 2 years ago
stock E55 lose against c 63 amg.. m3 will also lose against the c 63 amg... the c 3 amg is an awesome car. the sound is brutality. the acceleration is awesome. 4.5 sec from 0 to 100 km/h. 0,3 sec faster than the m3
HrPropanfloete 2 years ago
R u talking about the E46 M3?
GrahamGallaher 2 years ago
@HrPropanfloete m3 has a weak 4.0 liter unlike the amg's 6.3 liters
boostme92 2 years ago
0-60 time can be improved, the start is too gentle.
derbigpr500 2 years ago
In the real world my stock E55 is faster & quicker in the 1/4 mile!
AMGPWR 2 years ago
m3 gets killed little boy
stevbo200 2 years ago
@stevbo200 now imagine if m3 also had a 6.3 liter instead of the typical 4.0 liter
boostme92 2 years ago
You would be getting 641.7 HP, more than the ZR-1 with natural aspiration!
ErosaScuderia 2 years ago
its and 6.2L engine in the c63 so ..the m3 will have 420hp X 6.2L /4.0L= 651hp
xdragosx 2 years ago
obviously you dont know anything about how engines work...the horsepower output is not linearly rellated to the capacity of the engine..plus in this case the 6.2L engine is tuned down in the C63 as it can produce 525bhp in the E63 AMG and 563bhp in the SLS.
Now if you want to state that the M3 has a better V8 engine than C63 that depends on how you compare these two engines in terms of capacity vs output the M3's engine is better but in terms of power output and torque the C63 is way better
wwwpjgr 2 years ago
engine in c63 has nothing to do with the one in the sls except cylinder block .. every thing from the injectors tot the camshaft is diferent .. its not a software change.. and engine capacity has a lot to do with power .. even more in NA engines like those.
xdragosx 2 years ago
Yeah, different engine (code) in the sls according to AMG
onetwothreefour721 2 years ago
@xdragosx yea and my motorcycle makes 110 hp for .6L. So if it was a 4.0 L it would have 733
kxrider53 2 years ago
@kxrider53 true.. but .. then comes the torque..1
more hp less torque..
xdragosx 2 years ago
for the dude sayin the panamera is faster, even if it is(its not) it cost about 70k more
iamsinghisking 2 years ago
Dude the cts v does 0-60 in 3.9 you idiot
FerreiralovesFerrari 2 years ago
I like the Benz best, but the CTS is the fastest bro.
TorchTexas 2 years ago
Panamera is faster than CTS
fastestlapsDOTcom 2 years ago
Yeah, but this comparison didn't include that car....... unless I'm missing something. : /
TorchTexas 2 years ago
Dude the CTS-V has a 0-60 of 3.9 the panamera is not that fast
FerreiralovesFerrari 2 years ago
3.9 in a laboratory, 4.3 in the real world.
sspope 2 years ago
Panamera Turbo does 0-62 in 3.9. So it is even faster to 60.
fastestlapsDOTcom 2 years ago
Actually, the Panamera turbo is the fastest sedan in the world ... not that fast? LOL.
maxou5757 2 years ago
fastest saloon is BRABUS Black Baron (Mercedes E class) with more that 380 km/h.
Jushniykray 2 years ago 2
Yes but not on a track. The Porsche PAnamera Turbo is the one.
maxou5757 2 years ago
is it ? or the cls BRABUS rocket
myrule12 2 years ago
@Jushniykray ALL C-CLASS W204,S204 .; LOWEST GRIP FROM MERCEDES BENZ
kagerank789 1 year ago
M3!!!! is better
FabuluJET 2 years ago
no it doesnt edmunds suck at getting 0 to 60 time check out motortrend caranddriver or roadandtrack
datrucolombianballer 2 years ago
Edmunds does not use rollout for 0-60 clocking, so that's why their times are (more accurately) slower.
digitalbow 2 years ago
0:37-ish.... RACE THE TRAIN .... LOL
powerstrokediesel365 2 years ago
Now this is a quality review!!
mujn56 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you can buy a C6 z06 vette used for under 50k... And beat the living piss out of this thing in EVERY category. NOT to mention the new cadillac CTS-V with 550hp runs to 60 in 3.8 secs. Q mile in 11.8... Get it right dumbass... Can't beat AMERICAN MADE!!!
Mitroff85 2 years ago
So glad I'm retired,kids are selling American out
You guys must deal with it later in life.
It's OK with me.
youfja 2 years ago
what the fuck?!
In germany it's about 80.000 euros .. stock..
that's so unfair... We drive small, expensive and boring cars.. and you have the good ones:D
rs125spainno1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
U.S.A.all the way
Fuck the rest down south
youfja 2 years ago
europe isnt to the south of america dumb twat
snipski0894 2 years ago
I was saying they make Imports down south in the U.S.A. when you go to Alabama your in south
Japan Same thing.... Kentucky,Tennessee
youfja 2 years ago
we're not really in competition with the mexicans and brazilians are we?
i don't know of many cars they make
FuriousPumpkin 2 years ago
I just bought one, can't wait to get delivery in September
danetrader 2 years ago
should have got an m3
snipski0894 2 years ago
lets agree to disagree on that one
danetrader 2 years ago
ok then but i never said it was bad
snipski0894 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Slow!
hassan0098 2 years ago
what is skidpad ?
mrLECHOO 2 years ago
that's how many g-force a car can take in a corner before it break loose
mtf888 2 years ago
c63 is a competitor agianst the IS-F and the M3, not the fuckin m5 and cts-v
zxcv123123 2 years ago 46
for zxcv123123 everybody knows that !!!(almoust:) what they did they took the cars by price ...i`m not sure about 0-60 times like nytrus112 said
ziz4ever 2 years ago
@zxcv123123 actually the C63 is in the same car class as the CTS-V, but journalists just compare the CTS-V to the M5 because of its output. A true competitor to the M5 would be a STS-V in terms of car segment
timmy23apsb 1 year ago
@zxcv123123 Its actually got a better 0-60mph time than both of them.
huze5 1 year ago
@zxcv123123
but its still faster than both with the p31 package. ha!
MrIlovebmw86 10 months ago
@zxcv123123 Price wise the C63 costs the same as the CTS-V, the M5 costs are more in line with the $65k C63 over the $100k E63.
98MAzdaMilleniaS 9 months ago
Edmunds always gets crappy test times. C&D put out 0-60 in 3.9 in the C63. Hmmmm
nytrus112 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
crappest cars on earth? the VE is an awesome car.
sporknfoon 2 years ago
A size smaller than CTS-V
A shade behind in the performance numbers
But very close
toyotas2006 3 years ago
The cts-v competes with the m5 and the e63 not the m3 and the c63.
Towelman20 2 years ago
1:07 in slalom the driver hits the last cone, I dont know if the video editor noticed that. :)
Gazibablia 3 years ago 2
he did
simthesex 2 years ago
That's freaking hilarious! I kept playing it over and over and I couldn't help but laugh!
ricepaddy69 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the train beat it in the 1/4 mile
ffdd567 3 years ago
shut up
vapormercurial 3 years ago 5
lol
simthesex 2 years ago
You know we are biased toward our piece of craps. So get over it. I enjoy my car because it is cheap to maintain runs forever when maintained and runs circles around most cars out there. Mercedes are overpriced and when they break they are expensive to repair. They do break just as much as any other car. I used to work on all makes of cars. So I can speak from experience. Do you even own a Mercedes or are you just dreaming of one for some reason and defending the crap out of them? Just curious.
macvicar24 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice! SparkHID dotcom **Get Your Brightest Headlights w/Xenon HID SPARKHID** Cars OR Motorcycle Kits ALL MAKES ALL MODELS
Agradable! SparkHID Dotcom ** Obtener Su brillantes luces W / xenón HID SPARKHID ** Kits de motos o coches de todas las marcas TODOS LOS MODELOS
SparkHID 3 years ago
mercedes 4ever man !!!! f..ck M power of bmw... here we have AMG!!!
dasiotis13 3 years ago
I think I'll go with 5999cc here CTS V(s) are the current fastest four door sedans ... hands down... and will beat any stock 4door from Europe, Japan, Korea or China ... and guess what it was built in the USA...
zykkfyw 3 years ago
0-60 really in 4,5 seconds?? how can that be, it's faster than cls 6,3 and cl 6,3 amg!
but this is "only" 457 HP/
NITROURAN 3 years ago
What about the weight?
player1vladimir 3 years ago
I was just wondering, but you know, the mercedes c63 amg is lighter about 300-500kg than cls 6,3 and cl 6,3 amg. that's why it's faster. But know the question is, whether c63 is faster going from 100km/h to 200km/h. because when you go on such speeds, it's the question of engine and "horses" that you have. I don't think that the mass of the car is the most important thing in this case.
what do you think?
NITROURAN 3 years ago
The acceleration of an object as produced by a net force is directly proportional to the magnitude of the net force, in the same direction as the net force, and inversely proportional to the mass of the object.
a = F(net) / m
In other words for acceleration 2 things are important.
Mass (kg)- the mass of the car.
And the Force (Nm)- the torque of the car.
More torque = better acceleration
Lower mass (weight) = better acceleration
player1vladimir 3 years ago
Russia has the largest population of billionaires in the world, of course they launched the new 7 there. Americans only buy American & Japanese cars, thats where Lexus shines. But for the financially elite, not so much.
Oh, the Ford CEO rides around in a Lexus? That's funny because that ass-wipe let Ford nearly go bankrupt, that shows how much of a dumbass he is. You two share the same trait. Get a real opinion and then come back. Fucking children.
garoiscool 3 years ago
umm, actually the biggest market for German cars is in USA.
8MunchenBayern8 3 years ago
No it's not. Western Europe is. The United States is second, and getting smaller because of the economic crisis. BMW launched the new 7 in Russia to expand into the Eastern European market.
garoiscool 3 years ago
i'll spank the sh*t out of that over priced slush box. ( my weapon of choice is my 06 cts-v...the worlds only single turbo v on earth.)
zx9mic 3 years ago
First of all the CTS-V is in a different class, second Mercedes C 63 AMG doesn't have turbos or supercharges)
Also the Mercedes 63 AMG is the strongest V8 ever made!
player1vladimir 3 years ago
lol sorry sizzletits but gm makes the most powerfull v8 on earth. and what's with no forced indction benz's???? bi turbo v12's
all day...and i'll stll spank that euro junk.
AMERICAN,... BABY BITCH! peep my utoob vids...
click my name zx9mic.
zx9mic 3 years ago
Sorry, but the 63 AMG is the strongest Mercedes has claimed it is the world's most powerful naturally-aspirated V8 engine!!! No GM naturally asoirated engine is stronger then that.
Also that 5,4 L engine in SLR GT produces 680 HP and there is no GM Model that can even be close to pure European V8 POWER.
player1vladimir 3 years ago 2
Ever hear of the current Corvette z06 and the, GM's sister company in down under, the Holden Commodore HSV 427. It has 505 HP naturally aspirated. If you can't beat naturally aspirated, GM made V6 turbos that made way more power than any Euro V8, V12, etc. Buick GNX motors made 1000 horsepower out of a 3.8 liter turbo V6 back in the late 80's. Maybe before your time. Not sure.
macvicar24 3 years ago
The Mercedes 6.2L engine produces 525HP in SL 63 AMG and CL 63 AMG and is the strongest naturally-aspirated V8 engine known to mankind.
WOW 3.8L? lol
Remember the BMW M10 1.5L inline-four with 1500 HP
from 1986?
Or is that too smalll and too powerful for you?
player1vladimir 3 years ago 3
Comment removed
macvicar24 3 years ago
@player1vladimir The 1.5l your speaking of was based on the M10. It put out about 1300hp in qualifying, but ran about 850-900hp most of the time. This is a racecar engine. Its easy to pump out insane hp/l numbers when you have insane amounts of money and the engine only needs to last a few races.
biturboi6 1 year ago
@biturboi6 don't forget
experts who can make something like that.
Btw. a buick 3.8 Vs with 1000 hp mentioned above isn't something what i could call stock engine.
Also let me update my last comment the Mercedes 6.2L engine is still the strongest V8 in the world but now producing 571 HP.
player1vladimir 1 year ago
graphite
8MunchenBayern8 3 years ago
Brabus is on of the best tuners in the world if someone knows how to tune a car then it is Brabus.
player1vladimir 3 years ago
i agree with you 100% my friend.
i didn't know you were also a merc fan.
the new designs for the mercs are very good. very beautifull, and agressive sort of, just how i like it. CLASS!
diuryl 3 years ago
Ooh yeah i am a Big Mercedes fan
Here we have a saying it says God drives a Mercedes. Well that means that Mercedes is the best and there is no one who can say something agaisnt that. :)
player1vladimir 3 years ago
that's another thing we agree on.lol!!!
it is indeed the best car(s) on earth.
and brabus is the best tuner. lol!!!
diuryl 3 years ago
We have here another saying it goes something like this.
Mercedes is an automobile everything else are just cars.
player1vladimir 3 years ago
lol!!! good one......i heard another one long ago:
"a legend amongst legends, a lord over lords........mercedes-benz!"
diuryl 3 years ago
nice one
Here is another one
Glorify (praise) every car but drive a Mercedes-Benz.
player1vladimir 3 years ago
lol!!!!
you know in my country, or in most african countries....the president is always driven in a merc, and bmw's and audi's and other cars are for the prime ministers and other ministers. mercedes' are high class cars not just for anyone.
diuryl 3 years ago
The same is here in Europe Only in France and UK they drive they domestic cars.
player1vladimir 3 years ago
GT-R is fast, very fast. But if something goes wrong with its electronics, I bet the car wouldnt even take a corner properly or start. Who knows what might happen in an accident. A Porsche is still more technical and safe.
UnSaintLike 3 years ago
I'm sorry. But the Henessey isn't a 4 door. And it already been tuned to it's max. If Brabus decide to tune a SL65 AMG Black, it will be much better than a Henessey.
importedtuner 3 years ago
Brabus did tune an SL65 AMG and..
it sucks a LOT
it has about 1000 lb.ft. of torque and guess what? it's too much for the car. the handling is terrible and they had to limit the torque to 800 lb.ft.
find the topgear video at topgear (dot) com/uk/videos
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
CTS-V is in a different class
player1vladimir 3 years ago
And it is still way better then Toyota
player1vladimir 3 years ago
I agree, let's drop it ..sorry m8
xGLAVONJAx 3 years ago
As far as I know henessey does not come in caddys does it now ;-) Companies like AMG, Brabus,SVT,Saleen,Shelby ..etc are working directly with the manufacturer and are producing a car that is no different then a SVT Cobra(SVT specialty vehicle team)
I gave you an answer to your question ,I gave you a 4 door car that is faster WAY WAY faster then your granny caddy ;-)
Please do not change the subjecxt! Gotta think realy hard before posting something so ownage like this can be prevented son !
xGLAVONJAx 3 years ago
Dont try to twist shit around moron!You said QUOTE"CTS-V is the fastest 4 door"you can go back to the previous post and read it yourself if you dont belive me..or do you have altsheimers and forget sht all the time?
I gave you 2 cars that are faster then your caddy!2 of them,not 1 but 2,you said fastest 4 door ,I proved you wrong now you try to bring the child out in you by saying it cost more..well go cry to ya mother..you child !
xGLAVONJAx 3 years ago
Wow, what a retard !
You talk about stock cars...what is your defenition of a stock car, an SRT-4 comes turbocharged STOCK so does the 3000GT VR-4 ,the 2003-04 Cobra comes Supercharged...does that mean they come stock or tuned ..hmmmmmmm
Can you see the point you stupid fuk ?
You don't have an argument with me you moron what is your definition of a stock car you stupid fuk? We were arguing about a faster and better car that is a 4 door , I gave you 2 of them you fuk, not one but 2 ;)
xGLAVONJAx 3 years ago
Fukin kids these days...wow...that little 5999cc moron...what a joke...he must be a real american bread REDNECK...Like caddy is was ever a compatable sports car...hahahah thinking if they take the ZR1 engine put it in a caddy they are going to give the europeans some competition..hahahahhahahah
WELL KID DID YOU DO YOUR RESEARCH ON THE ROCKET AND HURRICANE ? IF NOT DO SO AND THEN SHUT THE HELL UP DONT COME UP WITH SOME BS I GAVE YOU A BETTER AND FASTER 4 DOOR CAR YOU STUPID FUK ;-)
xGLAVONJAx 3 years ago
Isn't it passed your bed time son? It's very late and you are still up....Well since you want to talk cars, let's talk cars, now son remember after this please go to bed and get some fkn sleep!
Your caddy is the big number 1 you think ha? heheheheheh well how about some BRABUS ROCKET in your life or if you are not into rockets how about some fkn G Power Hurricane??? heheheh You stupid fuk! Both of these cars would EAT,DIGEST AND SHT OUT YOUR CADDY !
730 HP 4 seaters ! FUK you and ur Caddy
xGLAVONJAx 3 years ago 2
It's like comparing an apple to a Melon !
Take the CTS-V and compare it to An SL 65AMG or the new series M5 comming out in 2010 or the Hurrican version or any other car out there that can Eat, digest and sht out the caddy any day any track all day long baby....get your facts straight kid !
xGLAVONJAx 3 years ago
i will take over bmw m3 any time bmw power all the wayyyyyyyy
1Starwar1 3 years ago
Some people like the less attractive car, or the less atractive girl...or ...they cannot afford the car....or they cannot get the good looking girl ;-)
God>Mercedes>Bmw>Porsche>VW>Other Cars>Man>Woman.....ahahahahahhahaha
xGLAVONJAx 3 years ago
YEAH EUROPEAN are the best
player1vladimir 3 years ago 5
more fun to drive? the GT-R has no exhaust note, and has no manual gearbox...you're pathetic...if youre so confident, why do you search Mercedes vidoes?
8MunchenBayern8 3 years ago
READ THIS COMMENT, IT IS THE LAST ONE I WILL WASTE ON YOU. no matter what i say, you call porsche inferior to the gt-r, a porsche is more fun, deal with it. you are wasting your life trying to make a cheap complicated uncommunitave car look as good as the ultimate sportscar, you life must have taken a bad turn somewhere with this commitment, seek mental help, before you post some kinda of proof the bad in your life has been put behind you and you can live normal and sane i will comment back.
venomviper32 3 years ago
european companies build the best cars they can build, they make 600 bhp SPORTS CARS that you can drive everyday and get some badge with using the noise and looks. you are being racist by saying it has a soul because its not german and ignoring that its a complex awd that has limited driver communication and a subtle exhaust note on track, a corvette, viper or nsx would also be fun, you are being racist against germany because a single sports car from japan is not as fun to drive... leave
venomviper32 3 years ago
please, i currently have a 1987 suzuki gsxr 750. you are PREJIDUCED against europe! you call anyone who likes a loud fun to drive car a badgewhore and tell them to drive an awd computer. you should not leave any comments from now on, you are trying to stimulate japanese and american sales, but trust me you are making a fool out of all of those companies. they build cars with good suspension and powerful engines with not much else but the europeans don't stop there! they spend extra 100,000s!
venomviper32 3 years ago
you think a 911, a true sports car with a soul is fair to compare to a car that doesn't roar, goes around a track with flappy paddles, awd, uses technology to sip away driving fun etc. the gt-r is nothing that can compare to a 911, theres no comparision, no substitute! you can't replace a 911, it doesn't matter what the best time tochio suzuki got after driving around the nurburgring in the same car over 150 times, porsche is better! they are bargains in comparision to a gt-r!
venomviper32 3 years ago
please stop trying to undermine the german cars, mercedes invented the car, porsche designed the "people's car", and they have engineered nearly every major breakthrough in the world of automobiles, that sat nav, abs, massage etc. in your lexus was created by mercedes. they build the best engines, they have the highest quality build (as of 2008), and trust me, no driving experience will ever match the 911, with rear mounted race bred engine and the sheer track experience.
venomviper32 3 years ago
please stop being racist against europe, the nuts and bolts in many jap cars and bikes are like marshmallows, same problem with vettes, they can be hugely capable on a track but on some the quality is awful. and you asked to bring up a time merc was more reliable than lexus, have you seen an old toyota, amazing anyone can bring themselves to drive them. honda builds good engines and good cars but there just not as good as a german car, they simply have more passion.
venomviper32 3 years ago
What a car! Awesome. I love the way the engine sounds.
osiyal 3 years ago
lol, its not like a mercedes taxi from the 1970s hasn't lasted 3 million miles or anything, well only 2.8 mil, only a lexus away from 3 million. btw test have shown that in an s klasse your heart rate it 5-6 bpms lower than in an ls (cruising). without merc there wouldnt be cars! also no abs brakes, massage, sat nav, digital tv in car etc. they were the first to all of those, they are ahead of everybody, go drive your lexus with its marshmallow build.
venomviper32 3 years ago
look at his name..honda japan pride, he has a butty buddy fetish for cheap cars, Mercedes forever.
8MunchenBayern8 3 years ago
wait for other new Audi A4 hole new look for Rs4
1Starwar1 3 years ago
what an awesome car. I hope to one day have it
garrettej8 3 years ago
I have to give credit were to the C63-AMG, but then again I can't help but notice that the M5 is bigger and still did nearly as good as the Mec, and the same goes for the CTS-V. This is just me, but I think I would still pay the extra $2k for the CTS-V, but that being said I'm also a huge fan of the tunability and simplicity of the LS series of engines. It would be awsome to see all three of these cars face off at the same track and same time though.
BigRed10287 3 years ago
The BMW M3 is truly one of the only other sedans that is better than the C63 in one or more of those categories
thecubanratio1 3 years ago
C63-AMG IS A HELL OF A MONSTER
hossam004 3 years ago 6
ford has never talk about bankruptcy read the news people they only need help if gm or chrysler go down the money they r taking is just for a back up again read the news call me a fanboy all you want... lexus is ok i like mercedes better way better looking cars
andrestnt 3 years ago
I hear the handling isnt the greatest on this car though...
bradenalmighty 3 years ago
Every "first drive" video of the C63 that i've seen mentions how communicative, confidence-inspiring, and great the steering and handling of the car is. Infact, in the most recent comparison test against the 2008 BMW M5 & 2009 Cadillac CTS-V, the C63 was rated first in overall driving dynamics, fun-to-drive, handling, and steering performance. So, to describe the handling,"isn't the greatest" wouldn't be the right way to describe it, & even saying it's "good" is definitely an understatement
thecubanratio1 3 years ago
Top Gear. They none of them, including "the stig" could hit the apex with the car. On road it may have good dynamics, and good feel, but when pushed to the limits on a track it doesnt hold up. Obviously not many people will be taking it on a track to test limits, but thats not the point.
bradenalmighty 3 years ago
well, when inside line compared those cars, they said they were comparing the best sport sedans out there (i don't know why the m3 wasn't in there), & a large portion of the comparison took place on track. It was commented on rotating its nose towards the apex better than the 2008 M5 or 2009 CTS-V. So this car definitely holds up, on and off the track, but, when its handling is compared to the M3's, that's where the line is drawn. & i would take insideline's word for it before I took Top Gear's
thecubanratio1 3 years ago
Every European car is better then Japanese cars.
Lexus is just a fucking Toyota.
player1vladimir 3 years ago
sounds pretty good!
wearenotfamous 3 years ago
I fucking love the sound...Better c-63 AMG than any Lexus for sure...but better than M3..seriously idk...
DarkTrancos 3 years ago
nope not better than m3
doublesizzle 3 years ago
ive seen you before lol
coolerdude44 3 years ago
i like this better than the m3...where does edmunds do there testing
caraddict520 3 years ago
Id like to find out where they do their testing too.
stvrcks6 3 years ago
0-60 was not impressive
mazda6tuner99 3 years ago