Conservation International is one of the very most important environmental protection groups working today. Support them if you can. We are nature, nature is us.
@MinaVanner Not all of us in the USA think alike. We are a nation of 350 million people. Lots of different viewpoints. Harrison Ford is one of the good people. Think a little harder before you stereotype.
@MulletPuppet Dang. Not to necessarily knock Tom Cuirse, but at least he's not a fanatic about it, at least I haven't heard much of it. He's a still and awesome actor though, as long as he doesn't go Cruise, I'm good. :)
@MulletPuppet Not to necessarily knock Tom Cruise, but I guess at least he isn't really going around mentioning it everywhere he goes, at least not hat I've heard of. He's a still and awesome actor though, as long as he doesn't go all Tom Cruise about it, I'm good. :)
Please see the Climate Scientists' Register that the International Climate Science Coalition have created & has been endorsed by 137 climate experts since June 2010:
tinyurl[dot]com/2es3rqx
The Register states:
“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."
I would've thought Han Solo would've been the least likely person to care about the environment, after all God knows how much damage the Millennium Falcon does to the ozone (especially when he's piloting it!).
Wanna know why Tatooine is so hot? Global warming. One day we'll wake up and we'll all have turned into Jawas and Sand People. (Kind of like Iraq, but without all the mindless violence and shooting.)
When rain forests like Endo get slashed and zapped by the Death Star it releases a ton of force carbonite into the galaxy…It really hurts the rebellion.
who would ever listen to a hack actor like harrison ford?People seems to be forgetting nature kills of massive sections of eco system from time to time.Fuck the rainforest bulldoze the lot of it for farms citys mines and cement!
@chocolateposters oh yes none of that dumb metrosexual looks (Brad Pitt). If he has ever gotten bottox it does not show...I love how his wrinkles look sooo manly!!!
You know what hurts us more Indiana Han Solo Jones? Having to watch a withered looking actor have his chest hair removed with wax...that is the painful truth.
@HairyGuyLostHisHair Rainforest BS? they are vanishing all over the planet. You can't just buy a new rainforest at the mall. Once they are gone our chances for survival will drop greatly.
that's ridicilous! blame third world countries and their deforestation problems solely for the world climate change is pure hypocrisy, America's industries and it's uncontrolled "development" are the main reason ,and the Marchurian candidate that Obama is, already said that he won't sacrifice his so called development in order to at least decrease the enviromental destruction!
USA are being controlled by the big corporations, and Obama is not very different from Bush if you ask me
i have another motto, how about this: lost here, felt there. for example, how about usa being the country that contaminates the most in the world, cars that weight two tons and one third the efficiency of any european or asiatic car to carry only one person and the reluctancy to set policies on engine efficiency, etc. like the problem was in some other part of the world, and not in the backyard. how about the rest of the world not being the garbage dump of usa?
Someone tell me, where is the impact of this video? It is just Harrison Ford swallowing the message that this "org" should give us. There is much more material to show people what is really going on in places like here, America Latina, as forests in Indonesia.
I have the same opinion of you, as a brazilian citizen I'm very worried with the amazon forest, I would like to be able to punish harder the people that are destroying the forest, but they are just puppets, poor bastards that are doing anything to live, the real big targets must be the people that buy the illegal wood. Most of this wood is illegaly exported to the US and Latin America to become furniture and paper
All the O2 expelled from the rain forests are used by the the rainforest. I bet people think that the CO2 emitted by US comes to the rain forest and goes back as O2.
Blame poor countries for the bad climate situation?!
I agree. I hate this. Lost there, felt here?? what do they mean with that? they are in heaven praying and we are in hell destroying?? come on... is lost everywhere. Not much people is saving resources there in the US. We are feeling their unconsciousness here too!!! Es cierto, todos consumimos y lo sabemos, pero no ando haciendo propagandas donde le echo la culpa a los demas, hago mi aporte al ambiente dia a dia, y espero que ustedes lo hagan tambien, y si, esta propaganda es una GRAN mierda.
I agree. I hate this. Lost there, felt here?? what do they mean with that? they are in heaven praying and we are in hell destroying?? come on... is lost everywhere. Not much people is saving resources there? in the US. We are feeling their unconsciousness here too!!!
Es cierto, todos consumimos y lo sabemos, pero no ando haciendo propagandas donde le echo la culpa a los demas, hago mi aporte al ambiente dia a dia, y espero que ustedes lo hagan tambien, y si, esta propaganda es una mierda.
Took me a bit to understand your post.....but I get it now. Those that care about the environment are pussies, right? And those who play Indiana Jones are the badasses? Thanks for clearing that up.
umm.. no, it actually means, those who put their problem, the damage they are doing to somebody else, and are not willing to take their blame or do something about their actions but instead of somebody elses are hypocrites, and those who don't get it but instead answer with things that are not relevant are just dumbasses
I'd agree with you....if you or I actually knew whether this "pussy" has done anything to help the environment other than make a commercial. But then again, it is SOMETHING which is better than nothing
lets pretend i am not talking about harrison ford, or as you call it that pussy, and lets just view some facts: two weeks before recent world summit, the al gore numbers are played down, and the summit ends with no compromise. usa is the country that dumps more co2 in the world nearly doubling the next country on the list, but after the summit there are tv commercials saying the problem is in the forests in some other country and because somebody else.. i call that hypocrisy. your answer?
My answer? Well, I would seriously consider who is putting out that information and for what purpose. Which would require research which I'm not prepared to do. I'm well aware our country has flaws. But I'm also well aware how other countries like to point out our faults while ignoring their own. My final answer? Find out who published those commercials and what financial interest they may have in doing so.
No, my main concern with his being a pussy comes from the fact that he has an earring and that he is shamelessly selling himself out for a cause that I'm sure he knows very little about.
Los unicos culpables son los gringos!! Osea no les da verguenza¿? Consumen como locos, solo piensen cuanto contamina Las Vegas y le echan la culpa al resto!!!La ropa sucia se lava en casa!! Malditos gringos
Sorry, pharmaceutical indutries are not the only one wich will profit in that. Oil companies will too since the rainforest area is rich in oiland also Natural Gas.
South America's rain forest has also one of biggest water supplies in the world.
This advertisement is only the beggining of the strategy to steal it all from us.
U.S.A is not worried about rainforest conservation. This propaganda´s porpuse is only to manipulate americans thought so when the american troops invade south america to steal our rainforest area for the only means of pharmaceutical industries profits, American people will think they are saving the earth.
Nice add, but pretty funny that the guilty ones are the poor contries, and not the rich ones that pollute with their industries... (sorry for the lame english)
My own state here in the U.S. has done a terrible job of doing the right thing for the animals. That is why I spend a whole bunch of money traveling to hunt the states that do the right thing for the animals. There has to be forest left standing in all places not just the rain forest. If you are going to cut down some trees? No problem, make sure you plant a few more.
I think it's important to care for our environment, and I do what I can. It is just REALLY irritating when some celebrities get on their high horses and preach about going green. Individually, they impact the enviornment WAY more heavily than the average person. Jetting here and there, heating and cooling enormous (and multiple) homes. They should just shut up already.
You have a good point there. Of course some celebrities also do more for the environment than many of us do as well. But nonetheless I think you have a point. The only thing I disagree with you on is instead of shutting up I wish they'd stop impacting the environment more in a negative way (ie, stop jetting around a lot and having multiple large homes as you said). Then there would be less hypocrisy.
Harrison bought an 800-acre ranch with a white-painted ranch house he built himself (he was a carpenter) in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, half of the ranch is now a nature reserve. There are mountains, woods and streams that surround Fords house.
He lives there, not Hollywood.
He's also a pilot and on an emergancy circumstances, saved a hitch hiker from dehydration. He's a complete badass.
Go find out more about him, before you start dissing him.
So good ole Harrison just stays home all day never belching co2 like a good ole lib. I imagine every time he flys wherever, he's buying "carbon offsets" like a good little tree hugger, hmmmm? By the way, do YOUR homework and try to point out his other 2 properties in LA AND New York. I hope you're not a lawyer cause you'd be a lousy one.
C02 doesnt cause globabl warming you idiot, im sorry but the whole lie about co2 gets on my nerves. Fear mongering, so they can tax us and blame us for being bad human beings. Ahhh the New world order is going to be fun, peace.
OneMove33, who are you talking to? I'm in full agreement that co2 isn't warming us, at least not in a way we need to worry. Water vapor is a more significant greenhouse gas and I don't see anyone calling that a pollutant. It's not only taxing us they want to do but they want to shrink the population, tell us how to live our lives and reach this nirvana that doesn't exist. I don't think I disagree with you.
Both are pollutants. And what fear mongering, if it's all true? You really believe that 90% of all the scientists out there just decided to scare the shit out of us? Besides climate changes are normal.
Huh what did i say i cant find my comment, assume your talkingabout my denial of co2 as the major contributor to climate change, is that correct what did i say, what scientists are you going on about? If i said 30,000 scientists believe that co2 does not contribute to climate change then the scientists trying to scare the shit out of are ones saying it does, im not sure of how many scientists who say it does.
Follow the money fart. It's all about the almighty dollar. Scientists say there's agw and get their grants from politicians who say what they want them to say. Their faulty models, computer models mind you, cannot mimic what's happening with our complex climate and won't. These lab rats never leave their little rooms and twist the facts to keep the cycle going. It's all very simple.
Harrison Ford fucking rocks. I could give a shit less about "global warming" but i do love trees and beautiful wilderness, and the rape of the natural world is real whether or not "global warming" and "climate change" exist. The fact is, renewable resources, such as trees, are only renewable if you fucking plant new ones after you make use of the ones there.
There are more than enough trees out there. You've been sold a bill of goods. You'll believe anything if you'll believe we're running out of forests. Go right ahead but the ramifications of going green are killing us. Look at Africa. If they were allowed to develop instead of being held back by idiots trying to keep them from progressing, they'd have less disease and more wealth. The ignorance on the left is shocking.
So, you are saying that since we won't run out of trees anytime in the foreseeable future, we shouldn't care about the maintaining the land. We should just use. I have been sold nothing, sir. I look at all things in this world with an individual critical eye and make my own decisions. I don't understand why people are so shortsighted. Perhaps we shouldn't think about issues until they are catastrophes, but that won't be in our lifetime. Why care what the future hold?
And Brazil clearing 4500 sq miles of forest annually to plant crops and raise livestock on the least fertile soil they have is a good idea in the long term. In Missouri, 93% of the land is privately owned and open for development. Not too big of an issue now, except for the fact that I would like to be able to travel more than a mile without running into people. Let's talk about Africa, ort777. I'm interested in what you have to say. I want to know who these idiots are?
"Not too big of an issue now, except for the fact that I would like to be able to travel more than a mile without running into people"
Is this an issue of population control or do you just not like people? Are people getting in the way of your little nature walks or something? Africa? Just pull yourself away from your greenie activist websites for a second and I'll show you plenty. Tell me what UN Environment Programme and Friends of the Earth have to say about Africa. Educate yourself.
People are, in fact, getting in the way of my little nature walks. I don't think I've actually ever looked at a "greenie activist website" before but I'll certainly take your advise and pull myself away from them, thank you. I am in fact a moderate, and I do not like people on the far ends of the spectrum. There is little logic or thought on either side. To me, an ecoterrorist and someone who doesn't believe in planned/effective/sustainable land use are the same.
"I am in fact a moderate, and I do not like people on the far ends of the spectrum. There is little logic or thought on either side."
This is a riot. Moderates aren't willing to take a stand on things. Liberals don't think but feel. Conservatives think things thru - that's all we do. We wouldn't have a country if conservative thought didn't exist. Name one great moderate and their achievement. There aren't any.
I sense you are anti-people. Sounds to me like you want population control.
Moderates actually do take stands on issues. Apathetic assholes don't take stands. The problem is that for a moderate to be successful, he has to operate in one of the main parties. You recognize them by the occasional votes against their party. We actually wouldn't have a country if it wasn't for compromise, but that is something forgotten today. It's unyielding fools that will bring us down.
You are wrong about me, but that's fine. It's not like we'll ever meet or talk after this.
So moderates are all about compromise??? This is ripe! Sorry, buddy, but liberals press and press until they invade and control every aspect of your lives because they don't believe you're capable of living it yourself. Conservatives feel otherwise. Is there middle ground on that? I don't think so. You either have people regulating the crap out of your life (ie today - and you see how that's going) or we go back to freedom, which is what works. Moderates just muddle things up.
I'm always intrigued by the simple thoughts of people who only see the world in black and white. Thank you for sharing... Well, I just sat here trying to think of something to say and I realized there is nothing left for me to gain from speaking with such a blind fool as you.
And this is the problem with you post-modernists. There's no right and wrong. Sorry, you'll find as you grow older that things are a lot more black and white than you think.
... I suspect that by the time I'm your age I'll be doing things too important to allow time to have these trivial generalities with people I don't know on Youtube. Oh well, you seem to know more about me than anyone else, so, what is my black and white thinking about this earth that leaves me closed to anything else? And since you seem to be the purveyor of truth, what am I missing? What is your point, you silly, simply creature?
Go ahead with the name calling if it makes you feel big. Did the Navy teach you that? Maybe but I doubt it.
I don't claim to know it all but I know when I step into a debate that I'm right. When we start cherishing trees over people, something's wrong. When we believe Al Gore over the thousands of scientists that have stepped out against AGW theory risking their careers, something's wrong. I would think someone that has such an open mind would see this but I may be asking too much.
The name calling is less about feeling big and more about boredom. Youtube is the wrong forum for a truly intelligent debate. I type this, of course, watching it count down my remaining characters.
Here's where the shades of gray come in: I've known some people that I would choose a tree over and many that I would choose over a tree.
I do not speak of standing in the way of progress for the sake of trees. I'm all for using resources, but I don't think driving creatures to the edge....
Well, whatever the namecalling is about, it's namecalling. I teach my children to do otherwise but they've still not outgrown it...
You say the use of our resources are driving creatures to the edge of extinction. I say we've more than enough resources and you're listening to the wrong people. Haven't creatures been dying off since the beginning of time? Why are we in charge now? Do you really think puny man can impact earth? Are you serious in thinking we're running out of trees? You can't be.
I am definitely done speaking with you. You are uneducated and empty. You make me very sad. I will answer each of your questions, but I will not elaborate, and then I am done with you.
Yes, but extinction results from outside factors, (ie. Cataclysmic even, failure to adapt to a changing environment). Humanity is not the cause of every extinction. Man is not puny and he can impact the earth. No I don't think we will run out of trees and I never said we will. You assume to much.
Uneducated and empty? You don't know me very well. I guess you can't handle another point of view-the correct point of view. I wouldn't be here if I didn't have the facts to back it up. I pick fights I know I can and will win. You've got nothing but rhetoric from Mr. Ford. Man is puny and part of a massive creation. He can't start or stop a storm, ice age and he certainly can't "save" anything nature wants to destroy. You've put too much importance on yourself and your fellow man.
You ever heard of a little thing (well, NOT so little) called, 'confirmation bias'?
These teachers and prof's are often the ones who HAVE been in the field doing the research and/or are associates with the same within their department.
You've 'read'. As in cherry-picking your casual, internet material and information?
Hogwash! These "teachers and prof's" are the ones cherry picking material and ignoring facts. The books I read deal in reality not some fantasy world that makes up stuff to scare little kids.
LOL!!!!! x5000 Yes, you ARE cherry picking!!! Most in academia do NOT do what you are talking about! But good looking out for the exceptions (only seeing the outliers) ... and learning a little bit more about 'confirmation bias'... I think you're getting there!
The facts lie with professionals like Roy Spencer, Fred Singer, Richard Lindzen and Patrick Michaels. Their degrees aren't so imaginary, now are they scorpius, hmmm?
Really, what so you know? Again, I call confirmation bias! Especially from one who just said that he doesn't care about what those within academia say.
Get your facts straight.... or else I will prove you wrong every time!
Just because those within a sheltered academic circle (yes, those same people who kick out those who believe differently from them) doesn't make them right. I suggest you stop holding these academics to such a high standard and maybe look at results. I go with results. I've worked with many top profs from all different fields and believe me, they're not perfect. In fact, they're mostly very prideful and have a hard time admitting their wrong. That tells you a lot.
Wow, you've really got some strange misconceptions! You still Mistake the entirety for the few exceptions. I can tell you don't think very scientifically.
You've already lost all credibility with your first comment at the beginning.
And you'll defend those that back a faulty theory to the end which proves you have no credibility at all. It's simple common sense and a brilliant mind that guides me. You should try it sometime.
and you can continue to seek the faulty "evidence" that supports your ideas, while ignoring the preponderance of evidence that says otherwise.
Politics has no room in science. But politics is clearly what drives your mind.
You really need to look up what confirmation bias is. You also need to look at the 1st comment of yours that I replied to to see how ignorant you joyfully are.
I know what confirmation bias is, scorpius. I also know that the facts do not support your view. I also know that modeling is faulty and that's the only thing you have going for you. How pitifully sad. I'm driven by pursuit of the truth. Your side is driven by politics and lunacy and idiots like Harrision for and Al Gore. I'll give you a word to look up since you're so interested in new terms:
And I'm supposed to be impressed that a psychologist tells me he doesn't care what I think? Hmmmm, there's something ironic there. I guess your profession never did impress me but that's another conversation. Why should I even listen to someone like you who pretends to be an expert in climate science and professes to be an expert in another? I'm just as competent as you are to speak on this topic, scorpius so get off your high horse. I'm highly educated as well so let's not throw that around.
Get your facts straight! First, there's no way I could care any less if my profession doesn't impress you, I can't help you with your misconceptions & ignorance.
The only one on a high horse is you. Secondly, I never said I was an expert in climatology, just an expert in the scientific method.
Third, you only search for the information that you wish to see, THAT is confirmation bias.
End of story! Man is changing the environment and it's already showing.
I don't demand anyone's attention. In fact, I wish all of you leftist, earth worshiping loonies would go back out into the woods and hug your trees and leave the rest of us alone. But until then I will continue to speak my mind.
You may know something about the scientific method but do you know anything about junk science? If you are willing to take the arrow for the people like Al Gore, go right ahead.
I would contend Al Gore & minions are guilty of confirmation bias.
I have already told you I'm apolitical! Do you know what this term means?
Stop seeking attention, stop creating your politically-bias version of science, bc that is BAD science. As I said before, politics has no place in science.
Yes, we are impacting the environment at an ever increasing pace. THAT is fact. You only like the small minority of "junk scientists" that agree with you.
I'm so angry? Is this your professional opinion? Because if it is, you need to dig a little deeper, take better notes and maybe listen to your patient before you jump to conclusions.
Yes, you may be apolitical but you're supporting a "science" that's been politicized by the left. Man may be impacting his environment but that impact is minute. If you're so certain of this theory, then show me the proof. A theory must be provable, right? You're still willing to stand by this?
Comment removed
imegatrone 1 week ago
Comment removed
imegatrone 1 week ago
Comment removed
imegatrone 1 week ago
Comment removed
imegatrone 1 week ago
Ha she pure pelted him in the face
kmce 1 month ago
lol
yuyu0623mi 3 months ago
Corduroy!!!!!!!!!! yeah!!!
idoidoidonot 3 months ago
old man still got it still indiana jones always indiana jones
ahceda09 5 months ago
Dammit, how old is this man. He was like 65 when this was made, and he still looks impressive with his shirt off.
Harrison confirmed for awesome
JoshTyrant 7 months ago 2
Lol I love how the girl holds it up at the end like "Fuck yeah. Look at that shit."
Nat4Brendan 7 months ago
Conservation International is one of the very most important environmental protection groups working today. Support them if you can. We are nature, nature is us.
benwillvv 8 months ago
Harrison Ford and Pearl Jam in the same 30 seconds?? It does not get much better than this.
ChrisNicholsFilm 8 months ago 2
dude is 68 and still looks in better shape than me... just seems not possible.
TheFiridian 9 months ago
Ich muss lachen.
666IsoldeBaden666 9 months ago
Was that an earring?
jarl1985 1 year ago 4
Corduroy!!!
spyroandcynderrock75 1 year ago
I'm sure with the amount of money Mr. Ford makes, he could build an entire new rain Forest.
casper123 1 year ago
Nobody believes in those hypocrites gringos LOL
Of Course the USA wants to destroy the Amazons forets for exploitation of OIL!
MinaVanner 1 year ago
@MinaVanner Not all of us in the USA think alike. We are a nation of 350 million people. Lots of different viewpoints. Harrison Ford is one of the good people. Think a little harder before you stereotype.
benwillvv 8 months ago
oh my. not sure such it really serves the cause to link crucial matters to superficial matters.
mrdotbryce 1 year ago
you are mineeeeeeeeeeeeeee i love you I am brasilian but i am yourrrrrrrrrrrrr
luciageneralsalgado 1 year ago
I will never shave my chest "beard"
goldbullet50 1 year ago
Used to like him, yes? Then he joined Scientology. Now I just consider him another nut!
MulletPuppet 1 year ago
@MulletPuppet whoa?? he joined scientology??? when?? sorry, late here...
moviesNtv 1 year ago
@moviesNtv
Yeah, there was one of those Hollywood E News type shows on a couple of months back which made mention of it. Disappointing if you ask me.
MulletPuppet 1 year ago
@MulletPuppet Dang. Not to necessarily knock Tom Cuirse, but at least he's not a fanatic about it, at least I haven't heard much of it. He's a still and awesome actor though, as long as he doesn't go Cruise, I'm good. :)
moviesNtv 1 year ago
@MulletPuppet Not to necessarily knock Tom Cruise, but I guess at least he isn't really going around mentioning it everywhere he goes, at least not hat I've heard of. He's a still and awesome actor though, as long as he doesn't go all Tom Cruise about it, I'm good. :)
moviesNtv 1 year ago
that was my rhetoric topic!!!
johnsoncuiChina 1 year ago
hahhahahahaha
xobandanapanda 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please see the Climate Scientists' Register that the International Climate Science Coalition have created & has been endorsed by 137 climate experts since June 2010:
tinyurl[dot]com/2es3rqx
The Register states:
“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."
Tom Harris
ICSC
TomHarrisICSC 1 year ago
exclusiif intervieww mit........ HAACHHIIISSAAHN FAAAAUUUUUUUUUHHHDDD
sjpc33 1 year ago
we have to stop those bloody indians from tearing down the rainforest!
opaz79 1 year ago
I love this video!
Make more of it please!
-James
afternoonoenm 1 year ago
haha looks like fun
afternoonoenm 1 year ago
RIP Harrison Ford
tntproductions444 1 year ago
Gods can't die
dpearce2k10 1 year ago 2
@tntproductions444 Nice try, fuckwit.
detoxmedia 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I WANT MY FAMILY BACK, I WANT MY FAMILY BACK, I WANT MY FAMILY BACK!
SomethingGodAwful 1 year ago
Just goes to show...you can be a complete dumbass and still be a Hollywood actor.
madaboutpolitics 1 year ago
Pearl Jam + Harrison Ford must be awesome, right? Wrong. Instead we get this...
jdmusic07 1 year ago
this is the dumbest thing I've ever fucking seen.
Gibson889 1 year ago
I would've thought Han Solo would've been the least likely person to care about the environment, after all God knows how much damage the Millennium Falcon does to the ozone (especially when he's piloting it!).
Wanna know why Tatooine is so hot? Global warming. One day we'll wake up and we'll all have turned into Jawas and Sand People. (Kind of like Iraq, but without all the mindless violence and shooting.)
jamesgravil 1 year ago
I see...So we need to stop waxing? Thank you Harrison Ford.
TheWitcherFanboy 1 year ago
When rain forests like Endo get slashed and zapped by the Death Star it releases a ton of force carbonite into the galaxy…It really hurts the rebellion.
EmpireLS56KW 1 year ago
a very sexy man!
ariesvr 1 year ago 2
that was the gayest thing ever. come on harrison.
whatareyoudoingbabs 1 year ago
who would ever listen to a hack actor like harrison ford?People seems to be forgetting nature kills of massive sections of eco system from time to time.Fuck the rainforest bulldoze the lot of it for farms citys mines and cement!
CONSTRINGACY 1 year ago
@CONSTRINGACY you are stupid because im not forgetting about the ecosystem
Mr85462130 1 year ago
Too bad I can't rip 'Hollywood Homicide' from my brain like that...
OriginalRocketJock 1 year ago
Wow, he's really fit for nearly being 70.
Mrster 1 year ago 2
He's so rugged and elegant.
chocolateposters 1 year ago 46
@chocolateposters oh yes none of that dumb metrosexual looks (Brad Pitt). If he has ever gotten bottox it does not show...I love how his wrinkles look sooo manly!!!
689433 1 year ago
@chocolateposters And stoned, don't forget that.
AntonKuzmins 10 months ago
@AntonKuzmins so is your whore of a mother
Seigu007 8 months ago
You know what hurts us more Indiana Han Solo Jones? Having to watch a withered looking actor have his chest hair removed with wax...that is the painful truth.
freestaterevolution 1 year ago
So Harrison, do you support cap and trade? If so, you're not helping the environment but hurting it. Wake up.
aprilbaby64 1 year ago 2
funny jajajaj
indianajonesindy 1 year ago
Nooooo. Enough with the rainforest BS. I love harrison ford but wtf
HairyGuyLostHisHair 1 year ago
@HairyGuyLostHisHair yeah stupid rainforests.... you suck.
MustardHorde 1 year ago
@HairyGuyLostHisHair Rainforest BS? they are vanishing all over the planet. You can't just buy a new rainforest at the mall. Once they are gone our chances for survival will drop greatly.
BiologicalDiverse 1 year ago
that's ridicilous! blame third world countries and their deforestation problems solely for the world climate change is pure hypocrisy, America's industries and it's uncontrolled "development" are the main reason ,and the Marchurian candidate that Obama is, already said that he won't sacrifice his so called development in order to at least decrease the enviromental destruction!
USA are being controlled by the big corporations, and Obama is not very different from Bush if you ask me
masondarko 1 year ago
"It changes our climate..." "...those evildoers!"
ronquila 1 year ago
Oh F*** you harrisson ford. we all know Obama plans to steal the pre-salt petrol from brazil, just say it...
Superpeps9 2 years ago 2
Developed countries lead in total carbon dioxide emissions.
Developed nations typically have high carbon dioxide emissions per capita.
Why blame countries "over there" for the suffering "over here"?
caiurolandu 2 years ago
That's my man!
mrsharrisonford 2 years ago
Made me laugh! (Too bad the complainers, arguers and name callers are here). I never realized how funny mr. ford could be!
alorenk 2 years ago
i have another motto, how about this: lost here, felt there. for example, how about usa being the country that contaminates the most in the world, cars that weight two tons and one third the efficiency of any european or asiatic car to carry only one person and the reluctancy to set policies on engine efficiency, etc. like the problem was in some other part of the world, and not in the backyard. how about the rest of the world not being the garbage dump of usa?
depicco 2 years ago
Yes. And maybe Columbia could stop supplying the universe with illegal drugs.
Just sayin....
LG15Fan 2 years ago
Watch popular TVShows at W W W . TV-Vide . NET
aicklenbanaszak 2 years ago
Someone tell me, where is the impact of this video? It is just Harrison Ford swallowing the message that this "org" should give us. There is much more material to show people what is really going on in places like here, America Latina, as forests in Indonesia.
I just disagree from this forced artist appeal!
cykantode 2 years ago
What about the forest that gets ripped out "over here"? Does it hurt them "over there"? Is there any forest to be ripped out "over here" anymore?
This video was very unfortunate in it's choice of words.
Also, wish the lady had hit Ford's nose hard as she pulled out his hair. Hypocrite...
arjanini 2 years ago
I have the same opinion of you, as a brazilian citizen I'm very worried with the amazon forest, I would like to be able to punish harder the people that are destroying the forest, but they are just puppets, poor bastards that are doing anything to live, the real big targets must be the people that buy the illegal wood. Most of this wood is illegaly exported to the US and Latin America to become furniture and paper
rdgreis 2 years ago
Toca PEARL JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAM !!!
This song ^^
lucyzebra51 2 years ago
All the O2 expelled from the rain forests are used by the the rainforest. I bet people think that the CO2 emitted by US comes to the rain forest and goes back as O2.
Blame poor countries for the bad climate situation?!
Jaguaribehelio 2 years ago
I agree. I hate this. Lost there, felt here?? what do they mean with that? they are in heaven praying and we are in hell destroying?? come on... is lost everywhere. Not much people is saving resources there in the US. We are feeling their unconsciousness here too!!! Es cierto, todos consumimos y lo sabemos, pero no ando haciendo propagandas donde le echo la culpa a los demas, hago mi aporte al ambiente dia a dia, y espero que ustedes lo hagan tambien, y si, esta propaganda es una GRAN mierda.
jennyliz99 2 years ago
I agree. I hate this. Lost there, felt here?? what do they mean with that? they are in heaven praying and we are in hell destroying?? come on... is lost everywhere. Not much people is saving resources there? in the US. We are feeling their unconsciousness here too!!!
Es cierto, todos consumimos y lo sabemos, pero no ando haciendo propagandas donde le echo la culpa a los demas, hago mi aporte al ambiente dia a dia, y espero que ustedes lo hagan tambien, y si, esta propaganda es una mierda.
jennyliz99 2 years ago
When did Harrison Ford become a pussy?
SgtMako 2 years ago
Took me a bit to understand your post.....but I get it now. Those that care about the environment are pussies, right? And those who play Indiana Jones are the badasses? Thanks for clearing that up.
LG15Fan 2 years ago
umm.. no, it actually means, those who put their problem, the damage they are doing to somebody else, and are not willing to take their blame or do something about their actions but instead of somebody elses are hypocrites, and those who don't get it but instead answer with things that are not relevant are just dumbasses
depicco 2 years ago
I'd agree with you....if you or I actually knew whether this "pussy" has done anything to help the environment other than make a commercial. But then again, it is SOMETHING which is better than nothing
LG15Fan 2 years ago
lets pretend i am not talking about harrison ford, or as you call it that pussy, and lets just view some facts: two weeks before recent world summit, the al gore numbers are played down, and the summit ends with no compromise. usa is the country that dumps more co2 in the world nearly doubling the next country on the list, but after the summit there are tv commercials saying the problem is in the forests in some other country and because somebody else.. i call that hypocrisy. your answer?
depicco 2 years ago
My answer? Well, I would seriously consider who is putting out that information and for what purpose. Which would require research which I'm not prepared to do. I'm well aware our country has flaws. But I'm also well aware how other countries like to point out our faults while ignoring their own. My final answer? Find out who published those commercials and what financial interest they may have in doing so.
LG15Fan 2 years ago
No, my main concern with his being a pussy comes from the fact that he has an earring and that he is shamelessly selling himself out for a cause that I'm sure he knows very little about.
SgtMako 2 years ago
@SgtMako Idiot, Mr. Ford has been involved with environmental issue since the 80's. He's part of Conservation International.
You're the cunt who really doesn't know anything about Ford, and probably the environment. Now fuck off!
figocooldude 1 year ago 2
@SgtMako Ford sits on the board of C.I. He is a true environmentalist and patriot. I can't explain the earring though...
benwillvv 8 months ago
Los unicos culpables son los gringos!! Osea no les da verguenza¿? Consumen como locos, solo piensen cuanto contamina Las Vegas y le echan la culpa al resto!!!La ropa sucia se lava en casa!! Malditos gringos
maddoxmelitaway 2 years ago
y vas a negar que tu no consumes tambien?
el mensaje es para todos, para los gringos, y para ti! asi que no le heches la culpa al primero que se te ocurre
snait1707 2 years ago 6
"The burning and clearing of forests is a major cause of global climate change"
Now... we... the people from Brasil... who own the Amazonian forest... are the bad guys??
The guilt for the climatic chances is ours??
Damm you americans!!! You ll not use the TV... to put the blame on us!!!
Capixaba1983 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
jennyliz99 2 years ago
Sorry, pharmaceutical indutries are not the only one wich will profit in that. Oil companies will too since the rainforest area is rich in oiland also Natural Gas.
South America's rain forest has also one of biggest water supplies in the world.
This advertisement is only the beggining of the strategy to steal it all from us.
vlrbcaixeta 2 years ago
U.S.A is not worried about rainforest conservation. This propaganda´s porpuse is only to manipulate americans thought so when the american troops invade south america to steal our rainforest area for the only means of pharmaceutical industries profits, American people will think they are saving the earth.
vlrbcaixeta 2 years ago 2
Nice add, but pretty funny that the guilty ones are the poor contries, and not the rich ones that pollute with their industries... (sorry for the lame english)
Jomeproductions 2 years ago 3
what an awesome add.
Big up to Harrison Ford
RinseOner 2 years ago
Right on!
thehiprockermon 2 years ago
WHY IS "Embedding disabled by request" FOR SOMETHING YOU WANT RE-POSTED???
JackieEco 2 years ago
great i would like help iharrison ford because i m jail mr chairman globo tv mr roberto irineu marinho
marcosrogeriofff 2 years ago
What a stupid commercial
mrmaciejm 2 years ago
My own state here in the U.S. has done a terrible job of doing the right thing for the animals. That is why I spend a whole bunch of money traveling to hunt the states that do the right thing for the animals. There has to be forest left standing in all places not just the rain forest. If you are going to cut down some trees? No problem, make sure you plant a few more.
DOGLUV007 2 years ago
hhahahahhahhahahahha!! I love Harry Forddd!!!! :)
amber58001 2 years ago 3
That was a Pearl Jam track in the background
jessemaurais 2 years ago 2
He must have needed the money REAL bad. Yow!
gonindunit 2 years ago
he is hot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lachen2 2 years ago 5
fjedn...
mishif 2 years ago
you think he's hot because he's a rich famous actor. if he was a stranger walking down the street you wouldn't care.
SearchingYT 2 years ago
But the thing is, that he really is hot
dandy1988 2 years ago
My name is Harrison Too *-*
HarryTubez 2 years ago
What a man... ;D
IloveSirLancelot 2 years ago
OUCH!
wolwering1 2 years ago
Harrison is so hot....
occtaviousrex 2 years ago
i like him, especially in indy movies...
polkadottedcat 2 years ago
I love this man
BROKENHOUSEFILMS 2 years ago
Indiana Jones/ Han Solo takes one for mother nature :D,
AinEstonia 2 years ago 11
Omg I agree!
occtaviousrex 2 years ago
My favourite commercial of all time!!
politiciandiva 2 years ago
long live harrison ^_^
im sure he grows an makes his own clothes from hemp and whatnot and enjoys and occastional toke :-)
diegopunk 2 years ago
he is a GOD
wagagii 2 years ago 3
I'm never Googling Harrison Ford again.
arcanasoul92 2 years ago
harrison ford is the f in coolest
ShortyKidGerry 2 years ago 3
why is everything upside down?
cardiaccat1 2 years ago
What's upside down?
ort777 2 years ago
lol that was on april's 1st
it was a joke that youtube made xD
joao1525 2 years ago
for some reason the first time i viewed this video everything including the words were upside down. I think it was my connection or something
cardiaccat1 2 years ago
That's probably the screwed up message.
ort777 2 years ago
That was probably on April 1st.
VeritasLiber 2 years ago
I think it's important to care for our environment, and I do what I can. It is just REALLY irritating when some celebrities get on their high horses and preach about going green. Individually, they impact the enviornment WAY more heavily than the average person. Jetting here and there, heating and cooling enormous (and multiple) homes. They should just shut up already.
wunderfool1973 2 years ago
You have a good point there. Of course some celebrities also do more for the environment than many of us do as well. But nonetheless I think you have a point. The only thing I disagree with you on is instead of shutting up I wish they'd stop impacting the environment more in a negative way (ie, stop jetting around a lot and having multiple large homes as you said). Then there would be less hypocrisy.
ToneFreak12 2 years ago
You guys need to do your homework.
Harrison bought an 800-acre ranch with a white-painted ranch house he built himself (he was a carpenter) in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, half of the ranch is now a nature reserve. There are mountains, woods and streams that surround Fords house.
He lives there, not Hollywood.
He's also a pilot and on an emergancy circumstances, saved a hitch hiker from dehydration. He's a complete badass.
Go find out more about him, before you start dissing him.
jonweasel 2 years ago 4
So good ole Harrison just stays home all day never belching co2 like a good ole lib. I imagine every time he flys wherever, he's buying "carbon offsets" like a good little tree hugger, hmmmm? By the way, do YOUR homework and try to point out his other 2 properties in LA AND New York. I hope you're not a lawyer cause you'd be a lousy one.
ort777 2 years ago
C02 doesnt cause globabl warming you idiot, im sorry but the whole lie about co2 gets on my nerves. Fear mongering, so they can tax us and blame us for being bad human beings. Ahhh the New world order is going to be fun, peace.
OneMove33 2 years ago
OneMove33, who are you talking to? I'm in full agreement that co2 isn't warming us, at least not in a way we need to worry. Water vapor is a more significant greenhouse gas and I don't see anyone calling that a pollutant. It's not only taxing us they want to do but they want to shrink the population, tell us how to live our lives and reach this nirvana that doesn't exist. I don't think I disagree with you.
ort777 2 years ago
lol well some believe it does, i know you dont but id typed it out before id realised and was like smeeeh post comment.
OneMove33 2 years ago
Both are pollutants. And what fear mongering, if it's all true? You really believe that 90% of all the scientists out there just decided to scare the shit out of us? Besides climate changes are normal.
DontFartInPublic 2 years ago 3
Huh what did i say i cant find my comment, assume your talkingabout my denial of co2 as the major contributor to climate change, is that correct what did i say, what scientists are you going on about? If i said 30,000 scientists believe that co2 does not contribute to climate change then the scientists trying to scare the shit out of are ones saying it does, im not sure of how many scientists who say it does.
OneMove33 2 years ago
Follow the money fart. It's all about the almighty dollar. Scientists say there's agw and get their grants from politicians who say what they want them to say. Their faulty models, computer models mind you, cannot mimic what's happening with our complex climate and won't. These lab rats never leave their little rooms and twist the facts to keep the cycle going. It's all very simple.
ort777 2 years ago
CRAP!
Naive Hollywood actors on the rampage.
arbide2 2 years ago
lol
TanWeiHou 2 years ago
WOW that guy is tough.
I tought it was only in the movies but I was wrong
DSMASTER911 2 years ago
omg who said he is hot? I dont say he is ugly but old :)
TheRammo 2 years ago
Harrison Ford fucking rocks. I could give a shit less about "global warming" but i do love trees and beautiful wilderness, and the rape of the natural world is real whether or not "global warming" and "climate change" exist. The fact is, renewable resources, such as trees, are only renewable if you fucking plant new ones after you make use of the ones there.
TenienDaithen 2 years ago
There are more than enough trees out there. You've been sold a bill of goods. You'll believe anything if you'll believe we're running out of forests. Go right ahead but the ramifications of going green are killing us. Look at Africa. If they were allowed to develop instead of being held back by idiots trying to keep them from progressing, they'd have less disease and more wealth. The ignorance on the left is shocking.
ort777 2 years ago
ort777
So, you are saying that since we won't run out of trees anytime in the foreseeable future, we shouldn't care about the maintaining the land. We should just use. I have been sold nothing, sir. I look at all things in this world with an individual critical eye and make my own decisions. I don't understand why people are so shortsighted. Perhaps we shouldn't think about issues until they are catastrophes, but that won't be in our lifetime. Why care what the future hold?
TenienDaithen 2 years ago
And Brazil clearing 4500 sq miles of forest annually to plant crops and raise livestock on the least fertile soil they have is a good idea in the long term. In Missouri, 93% of the land is privately owned and open for development. Not too big of an issue now, except for the fact that I would like to be able to travel more than a mile without running into people. Let's talk about Africa, ort777. I'm interested in what you have to say. I want to know who these idiots are?
TenienDaithen 2 years ago
"Not too big of an issue now, except for the fact that I would like to be able to travel more than a mile without running into people"
Is this an issue of population control or do you just not like people? Are people getting in the way of your little nature walks or something? Africa? Just pull yourself away from your greenie activist websites for a second and I'll show you plenty. Tell me what UN Environment Programme and Friends of the Earth have to say about Africa. Educate yourself.
ort777 2 years ago
People are, in fact, getting in the way of my little nature walks. I don't think I've actually ever looked at a "greenie activist website" before but I'll certainly take your advise and pull myself away from them, thank you. I am in fact a moderate, and I do not like people on the far ends of the spectrum. There is little logic or thought on either side. To me, an ecoterrorist and someone who doesn't believe in planned/effective/sustainable land use are the same.
TenienDaithen 2 years ago
"I am in fact a moderate, and I do not like people on the far ends of the spectrum. There is little logic or thought on either side."
This is a riot. Moderates aren't willing to take a stand on things. Liberals don't think but feel. Conservatives think things thru - that's all we do. We wouldn't have a country if conservative thought didn't exist. Name one great moderate and their achievement. There aren't any.
I sense you are anti-people. Sounds to me like you want population control.
ort777 2 years ago
Moderates actually do take stands on issues. Apathetic assholes don't take stands. The problem is that for a moderate to be successful, he has to operate in one of the main parties. You recognize them by the occasional votes against their party. We actually wouldn't have a country if it wasn't for compromise, but that is something forgotten today. It's unyielding fools that will bring us down.
You are wrong about me, but that's fine. It's not like we'll ever meet or talk after this.
TenienDaithen 2 years ago
So moderates are all about compromise??? This is ripe! Sorry, buddy, but liberals press and press until they invade and control every aspect of your lives because they don't believe you're capable of living it yourself. Conservatives feel otherwise. Is there middle ground on that? I don't think so. You either have people regulating the crap out of your life (ie today - and you see how that's going) or we go back to freedom, which is what works. Moderates just muddle things up.
ort777 2 years ago
I'm always intrigued by the simple thoughts of people who only see the world in black and white. Thank you for sharing... Well, I just sat here trying to think of something to say and I realized there is nothing left for me to gain from speaking with such a blind fool as you.
TenienDaithen 2 years ago
And this is the problem with you post-modernists. There's no right and wrong. Sorry, you'll find as you grow older that things are a lot more black and white than you think.
ort777 2 years ago
... I suspect that by the time I'm your age I'll be doing things too important to allow time to have these trivial generalities with people I don't know on Youtube. Oh well, you seem to know more about me than anyone else, so, what is my black and white thinking about this earth that leaves me closed to anything else? And since you seem to be the purveyor of truth, what am I missing? What is your point, you silly, simply creature?
TenienDaithen 2 years ago
Go ahead with the name calling if it makes you feel big. Did the Navy teach you that? Maybe but I doubt it.
I don't claim to know it all but I know when I step into a debate that I'm right. When we start cherishing trees over people, something's wrong. When we believe Al Gore over the thousands of scientists that have stepped out against AGW theory risking their careers, something's wrong. I would think someone that has such an open mind would see this but I may be asking too much.
ort777 2 years ago
The name calling is less about feeling big and more about boredom. Youtube is the wrong forum for a truly intelligent debate. I type this, of course, watching it count down my remaining characters.
Here's where the shades of gray come in: I've known some people that I would choose a tree over and many that I would choose over a tree.
I do not speak of standing in the way of progress for the sake of trees. I'm all for using resources, but I don't think driving creatures to the edge....
TenienDaithen 2 years ago
Well, whatever the namecalling is about, it's namecalling. I teach my children to do otherwise but they've still not outgrown it...
You say the use of our resources are driving creatures to the edge of extinction. I say we've more than enough resources and you're listening to the wrong people. Haven't creatures been dying off since the beginning of time? Why are we in charge now? Do you really think puny man can impact earth? Are you serious in thinking we're running out of trees? You can't be.
ort777 2 years ago
I am definitely done speaking with you. You are uneducated and empty. You make me very sad. I will answer each of your questions, but I will not elaborate, and then I am done with you.
Yes, but extinction results from outside factors, (ie. Cataclysmic even, failure to adapt to a changing environment). Humanity is not the cause of every extinction. Man is not puny and he can impact the earth. No I don't think we will run out of trees and I never said we will. You assume to much.
TenienDaithen 2 years ago
Uneducated and empty? You don't know me very well. I guess you can't handle another point of view-the correct point of view. I wouldn't be here if I didn't have the facts to back it up. I pick fights I know I can and will win. You've got nothing but rhetoric from Mr. Ford. Man is puny and part of a massive creation. He can't start or stop a storm, ice age and he certainly can't "save" anything nature wants to destroy. You've put too much importance on yourself and your fellow man.
ort777 2 years ago
take some science classes then speak otherwise fail
playboy414 2 years ago
And listen to propaganda from the left? I think not. I know plenty because I've read what the experts say, not teachers and prof's.
ort777 2 years ago
ort777,
You ever heard of a little thing (well, NOT so little) called, 'confirmation bias'?
These teachers and prof's are often the ones who HAVE been in the field doing the research and/or are associates with the same within their department.
You've 'read'. As in cherry-picking your casual, internet material and information?
scorpius319 2 years ago
Hogwash! These "teachers and prof's" are the ones cherry picking material and ignoring facts. The books I read deal in reality not some fantasy world that makes up stuff to scare little kids.
ort777 2 years ago
LOL!!!!! x5000 Yes, you ARE cherry picking!!! Most in academia do NOT do what you are talking about! But good looking out for the exceptions (only seeing the outliers) ... and learning a little bit more about 'confirmation bias'... I think you're getting there!
scorpius319 2 years ago
And if the facts are not within the professionals... I guess they must be with you,... after all, you're MORE than qualified, huh?
So, how is arm chair learning/science treating you? Did you get your imaginary degree yet?
scorpius319 2 years ago
The facts lie with professionals like Roy Spencer, Fred Singer, Richard Lindzen and Patrick Michaels. Their degrees aren't so imaginary, now are they scorpius, hmmm?
ort777 2 years ago
Really, what so you know? Again, I call confirmation bias! Especially from one who just said that he doesn't care about what those within academia say.
Get your facts straight.... or else I will prove you wrong every time!
scorpius319 2 years ago
Just because those within a sheltered academic circle (yes, those same people who kick out those who believe differently from them) doesn't make them right. I suggest you stop holding these academics to such a high standard and maybe look at results. I go with results. I've worked with many top profs from all different fields and believe me, they're not perfect. In fact, they're mostly very prideful and have a hard time admitting their wrong. That tells you a lot.
ort777 2 years ago
Wow, you've really got some strange misconceptions! You still Mistake the entirety for the few exceptions. I can tell you don't think very scientifically.
You've already lost all credibility with your first comment at the beginning.
scorpius319 2 years ago
And you'll defend those that back a faulty theory to the end which proves you have no credibility at all. It's simple common sense and a brilliant mind that guides me. You should try it sometime.
ort777 2 years ago
and you can continue to seek the faulty "evidence" that supports your ideas, while ignoring the preponderance of evidence that says otherwise.
Politics has no room in science. But politics is clearly what drives your mind.
You really need to look up what confirmation bias is. You also need to look at the 1st comment of yours that I replied to to see how ignorant you joyfully are.
scorpius319 2 years ago
I know what confirmation bias is, scorpius. I also know that the facts do not support your view. I also know that modeling is faulty and that's the only thing you have going for you. How pitifully sad. I'm driven by pursuit of the truth. Your side is driven by politics and lunacy and idiots like Harrision for and Al Gore. I'll give you a word to look up since you're so interested in new terms:
disconnect (as in from reality)
ort777 2 years ago
haha, lol
whatever you wish to think
I'm apolitical, it's clear that politics drives your quest for 'truth' and thus blinds you to your own projections (ie. imagination).
scorpius319 2 years ago
It must be your belief system burned into you on campus then. I think I know what's up with you.
ort777 2 years ago
I've been schooled from many different campuses. The ONLY thing that you 'think' you know about me is the foibles of your imagination.
Get a proper education, then we can talk.
You are politically driven, and it is best to forget politics... you ever heard of a term, 'enantiodromia'?
I'm an analytical/depth psychologist, and I know more about the workings of the human psyche than you could hope for.
But again, what ever you wish to think.
Why is it so important that I believe in your views?
scorpius319 2 years ago
And I'm supposed to be impressed that a psychologist tells me he doesn't care what I think? Hmmmm, there's something ironic there. I guess your profession never did impress me but that's another conversation. Why should I even listen to someone like you who pretends to be an expert in climate science and professes to be an expert in another? I'm just as competent as you are to speak on this topic, scorpius so get off your high horse. I'm highly educated as well so let's not throw that around.
ort777 2 years ago
Are you still demanding my attention?
Get your facts straight! First, there's no way I could care any less if my profession doesn't impress you, I can't help you with your misconceptions & ignorance.
The only one on a high horse is you. Secondly, I never said I was an expert in climatology, just an expert in the scientific method.
Third, you only search for the information that you wish to see, THAT is confirmation bias.
End of story! Man is changing the environment and it's already showing.
scorpius319 2 years ago
I don't demand anyone's attention. In fact, I wish all of you leftist, earth worshiping loonies would go back out into the woods and hug your trees and leave the rest of us alone. But until then I will continue to speak my mind.
You may know something about the scientific method but do you know anything about junk science? If you are willing to take the arrow for the people like Al Gore, go right ahead.
I would contend Al Gore & minions are guilty of confirmation bias.
Me ignorant? Hardly.
ort777 2 years ago
GRRRR!!! You're so angry!
Aw,... do you need a hug?
I have already told you I'm apolitical! Do you know what this term means?
Stop seeking attention, stop creating your politically-bias version of science, bc that is BAD science. As I said before, politics has no place in science.
Yes, we are impacting the environment at an ever increasing pace. THAT is fact. You only like the small minority of "junk scientists" that agree with you.
Don't bother me anymore with your angry BS.
scorpius319 2 years ago
I'm so angry? Is this your professional opinion? Because if it is, you need to dig a little deeper, take better notes and maybe listen to your patient before you jump to conclusions.
Yes, you may be apolitical but you're supporting a "science" that's been politicized by the left. Man may be impacting his environment but that impact is minute. If you're so certain of this theory, then show me the proof. A theory must be provable, right? You're still willing to stand by this?
ort777 2 years ago