N1 Rocket

[HerramientasDig]

if the r7 have 20 bosters way les than the n1 why ? it was moree camplicated if the n1 have 36 bosters

[skyprop]

Oh OK these are Soviet Launch disasters

[skyprop]

I think some of these views were mixed up with "The Nedelin Disaster" of an R-16

[IASOU2005]

Where should we park this n1 sir?

Waaaaaaay over there.

[ollenhauer1]

korollov the same ing, dead 1966,there from problem.super music,top video

[ollenhauer1]

korollov the same ing, dead 1966,there from problem

[Sima77]

bullshit! on H1 has never tried to launch astronauts! phrase speaker at the beginning of the video translates as: "obtained a typical lunar craters, even with the central hill" text on the screen - just a bunch of letters with no meaning (except the words "ROCKET") better to remove the video and do not disgrace!

[aridipi08]

@Sima77 You do not understand anything. Not a video documentary is a """MUSIC VIDEO""""

[wikipedio]

una mierda

[aridipi08]

@wikipedio No, si tus videos del "Perro Paul", seguro que son mejores que los mios...!!!

[doormagic]

How many thousands died in the URSS to the Soviet Union put a nuclear missile in space?

[iplayfhorn]

I like the music. Good job!

[aridipi08]

@iplayfhorn Thank you very much. I invite you to listen to my other songs.

[rossco1966]

Theres ya problem! you broke the champagne on the transporter and not on the rocket body!!! Fatal mistake. You never do that with ship launches either.

[aridipi08]

@rossco1966 Very good detail ...

[paladinodasensatez]

You juxtaposed images of N1 disasters as well as the nedelin catastrophe and Soyuz 1 failure and Soyuz T-10A among others.

[aridipi08]

OK, they are only images to accompany the music is really important

[aridipi08]

This is just a video clip, so the editing of the images was simply to accompany the music.

[dajsinjo]

people burning was not from N1 launch

[breg77]

Nice footage - by why did you write your name in there? You will have no rights for the material anyway, so why disturbe the viewers?

[aridipi08]

My name is not written for the images, this by music that is mine

[aridipi08]

No problem, this is a video artist only!

[kapitankartoon]

If it worked would russia be on the moon before apollo? would they have done more on the moon if they were not first.?

[aridipi08]

Of course. If the N1 Rocket had been more successful, the Soviet ones would be pioneering. Also the moon they would have permanent bases in the moon.

[MightySaturn5]

lol...the N-1 was only one of many, many problems they had...get real

[IuliTr85]

Nasa did not had problems? and was one step behind every time? but they manage to recuperate all that and went to moon, right? Wheel this problem is a dispute to this day, and someting is not right. Look for more materials, I sugest to you Secret Space, interviews of Richard Hoagland and some vids from favorites on my chanell. You take the chalenge?

[MightySaturn5]

All of NASA's problems were well documented and well publicized -the amount of effort and engineering that went into everything from the smallest bolt to the Saturn V itself have been written into countless books and articles.

The soviets ALWAYS had a date to beat since the time and dates of all NASA launches were posted worldwide plus ALL American launches were broadcast live on tv and radio.

Due to fear of the world finding out the truth about soviet quality they ALWAYS hid everything

[IuliTr85]

K then, but why is NASA buying engines from Energomash (Russia)?

[MightySaturn5]

Because those engines are excellent and well designed, this saves NASA from having to divert its limited budget on R&D for new designs.

The Energomash engines have come a long way, they work very well, are extremely reliable yet inexpensive -with such a lack of money using excellent Energomash engines makes sense.

After NASA's reduced post Apollo budget they couldn't even afford to pursue the 2nd generation F-1 (F-1A) even though it was man rated by 71' and had over 2 million lbs of thrust.

[IuliTr85]

There are things behind all this media crap they give us. The world today is run by one guverment that uses resources for another purposes and barely scientific. The research must be done on many fields to find out some things, if you are interested... For instance how NASA program began and who coordinate it.

[IuliTr85]

I agree, the socialim works better in this circumstances. They say this project was a failure but now NASA is buying the NK unique engines. And NASA after all her problems recuperated and went to moon? I dont buy this story. The truth is out there.

[inzhener2007]

ТЕтя мотя не захотела работать!