theres an episode where Dara loses it over Rich Hall making jokes about his name or something, can anyone recall which episode that is, Rich was doing his usual deadpan but Dara thought he was having a go and started losing it a little, any takers? Trying to find it again
with Dara's family name does it get pronounced o'breean -Iain is an alternative to Ian and I am wondering about this as i have never seen that family name before. (my name is Ian by the way )
@DigitalTwisted You missed a period near the end. :) Still a very fair point, as I'm phrasing this sentence very cautiously; even started it with "but" at first. Using a semi-colon is rather daring of me.
"When you were in school the definition of the triple point was not degrees centigrade." I got so confused then I was like ooooh... naught! I doesn't help how british people pronounce 'not' like 'naught'.
@Gavin17259 strangely enough if you knew a little about the history of English language. The English that Americans speak is closer to how England was 250 years ago than the English spoken today by Brits. When the Mayflower left with the puritans on board, everyone spoke the same, but English changed considerably due to the influences of Europe while in America it diversified much less.
@Gavin17259 haha, a race war. between the white people over there and the white people over here. We're the same brotha, only difference is you guys talk funny.
I love this show but the newest series is taking itself too seriously. I miss the times where the show had nobody but comedians on the panel. And seriously, stop bringing Sandy Toksvig on.
I don't know what these guys are talking about. The triple point has to do with Temperature AND pressure. Meaning you can have a triple point at 0, 0.01, 10 or even 100 degrees Celsius depending on the pressure.
@haz464 Religion and Science. The first stands on one big assumption/belief, while the latter stands on many smaller beliefs/assumptions. For all we know, it could all still be gnomes and magic. Just saying.
@ntnima Wrong, you obviously have brain damage if you don't understand how science works. We have no evidence of gnomes and magic so obviously it is not how things work. Typical theists with their strawman arguments. Just saying.
@haz464 oh wait, hang on.. no you're not. I just rememberd the black swan theory. Imma take your warning about brain damage seriously though, and get meself a checkup
@ntnima Science relies on empirical evidence, not belief you dumb cunt. Although it's apparent to me you're a complete idiot since you can't even type properly :p Why don't you do your bit and kill yourself for the good of the gene pool?
@haz464 awww.. you're adorable. fear not. i shall castrate myself for the good of mankind asap.
I would have entered a respectable epidemiological debate with you. But, judging by your posts, that would be a futile move. So instead imma just continue to type like an idiot so as to allow you to vent your juvenile anger in this comment section...
c'mon keep insulting a complete stranger. gogogo you magnificent minded man. You comments are argumentative poetry to my ears.
@ntnima You see the problem here is you assume I am angry. What is actually happening is you are embarassing yourself by showing everyone you are a complete retard as evidenced by the fact that you don't even know what epidemiological means. Going to go out on a whim here and assume you meant epistemological, even then you don't make any sense because you didn't offer any cohesive arguments apart from "lol well mayb we're totally wrong!" Stay classy theist :p
@haz464 nah bro. I am no theist. I am simply not a hardline atheist. u can consider me a humble agnostic, simply cause I would consider myself unscientific to believe in the nonexistence of god without conclusive evidence to that effect.
touche for the epistemological point (spell check fail)
I don't assume you're mad. I'm amused that you treat me like a theist. I'm also amused that you're under the impression that you are defending scientific rigorousness while talking with silly vulgarities.
@ntnima It's not unscientific to be an atheist but nor is it unscientific to be agnostic either. The truth is we are so far away from a theory of everything that we can't yet know if deities exist or not, but given the extreme unlikeliness of any religions that have been imagined over the relatively short time sentient humans have existed then it is a safe assumption that deities don't exist. What I suppose we can agree on is that faith is a poor tool to understand the laws of our universe
@haz464 well, my point was that "a safe assumption" is not a definitive conclusion.
My initial post was drawing exactly on this thing. The fact that we choose to safely assume certain things in science is often overlooked. In fact most of the laws of physics apply only in idealized situations. Many of the scientific constants are best estimates (ergo the many smaller beliefs/assumptions)
But obviously science is much more useful and practical in understanding and engineering the world
@ntnima True, but science is an ongoing process and is subject to constant refinement as we uncover more evidence and can prove things. It is very rare for science to be completely overhauled, only in extreme circumstances is this ever done like when we thought everything in the universe revolved around the Earth or that the Earth was flat. Until we know everything that can be known, then there will inevitably be a belief element in science
@haz464 knowledge is defined as "justified true belief"
religions were perhaps the first attempts to achieve a wholistic knowing. They had belief, they were crudely justified and were taken to be true.
same with science, through the scientific method. Belief is the hypothesis. Justified is the testing of said hypothesis. Whether it is true or not though is always up for debate. True truth is not as easy to find as one would think when you have to rigorously prove it.
We see yellow flowers, bees see them as ultraviolet and bluey.
Science tells us what wavelength it is. That's truth. Colour is not a lie, but just an interpretation of something true. God is responsible for everything, whatever that is, is God, could be a god particle. But we know it's definitly not anything anyone knows. And therefore, the word is useless, and should be ignored. Hence why ignoring god is part of the scientific method.
@haz464 anyway man, youtube comment boards are a retarded place to discus the gnostic esoterism, science, and the nature of knowledge. It's 4 in the morning and I feel like reading a book.
@ntnima Yeah was just thinking the same thing tbh, sorry for the insults but it's rare to ever encounter anyone with any intelligence on youtube comments so I just assumed you were trolling/ignorant and got frustrated. see ya
@haz464 wow! i did not expect to find a well reasoned and intelligent (if a little vulgar at times) argument about the validity of science and religion whilst linking my way through youtube. i must say i'm impressed. you've both given me quite a lot to think about especially in reference to the "black swan theory" which i was unfamiliar with. thanks @ntnima and @haz464 :)
@HiddenRainful "Do you think that it is morally correct to economically deprive a site"
I'm not actually depriving them of anything. Your argument is that ad companies could hypothetically pay less because I don't watch their ads and that I should let this hypothetical situation influence my behavior.
"which many people like myself enjoy and respect"
Relevance?
"because they use ads to support this site instead of charging viewers?"
False dichotomy. Plus charging for views would destroy them.
@HiddenRainful There's starving people in the world, yet you argue with me over whether or not I should dedicate my time to making sure a mega-corporation gets more money. There's nothing left to say. Disagree with me if you like, I'm not your puppet to dance to your subjective moral values.
@HiddenRainful Your morality isn't the only morality. Just because you don't like my views doesn't make me immoral or selfish or immature. My opinion is different.
By the way, Youtube doesn't give us videos. All they do is provide a central viewing location.
I can't choose to go to a site where they use donations instead of advertising because no such site can survive with YouTube in existence.
Your attempt to badger me into your morality has been riddled with fallacies and assumptions.
@HiddenRainful Oh, is that what direct insults mean? Let me show you the first insult in this conversation: "Stop being such a selfish cunt."
I didn't say it. You did. You should be careful not to make presumptuous statements about the intent behind an action when you've taken the action first because, while you can't establish that it applies to me, it's hard to argue that your own intent isn't the same as the one you presume.
@HiddenRainful What the hell do you think the INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT rates, exactly? And, damn it, stop saying stupid shit so I can stop correcting you.
@HiddenRainful At any rate, I tried to end this conversation once, I just can't stand idiocy. I am going to try, though. No matter how imbecilic your reply, I think I will leave it be this time. Enjoy.
@HiddenRainful I don't see how stating a fact is arrogant, especially when my intelligence has been called into question. I know what my IQ is and how that rates my intelligence against others. I can't believe you don't realize that not being able to imagine the relevance of imagination means you lack imagination. Demonstration of your lack of intelligence, I suppose. Imagination is involved in imagining alternatives to intrusive advertising. It's also useful in following a simple analogy.
@HiddenRainful Your message was marked as spam, so I didn't see it until now. The fact that you don't see how imagination is relevant is an indicator of your lack of imagination.
@HiddenRainful Your lack of imagination is amusing, but I think it's time to end this conversation. No matter what I say, you won't get any more intelligent. Bye now.
The level of HiddenRainful's intelligence apparently surpasses yours, be it unimportant. .
What they're saying is that YouTube hosts advertising space due requiring profit. If YouTube gains no profit, a subscription charge (or similar) will need to be introduced to regular users. If staff cannot be paid for their services, and YouTube partners cannot be paid, YouTube will no longer be able to provide a service to users without charge. HiddenRainful is correct, you are selfish.
@TheDarkAngel1704 Oh, that's not likely. Very, very few people surpass my intelligence. In any case, you proposed a false dichotomy. It's not "either advertising or subscription charge." It's advertising in a variety of forms, of which I've only specified objection to one, or a subscription charge, or donations, or something that none of us has considered. The fact is, as long as advertising is an accepted means of receiving funds, no one will look for a better solution.
@HiddenRainful And yet the last time I made an analogy, you understood. Odd that. It's almost like the entire point of your posts are to draw out a disagreement. Have you considered living under a bridge and charging people for crossing it?
@HiddenRainful Hah, nice, you think you're the arbiter of morality. In that case, I'll be the arbiter of morality: please stop letting Youtube kill people.
@HiddenRainful I am not subject to your ideals. Since you want to impose them on me, you can adopt mine instead: start using ad-blocker or stop using Youtube,
There's no apostrophe between the 'O' and the 'Briain' in his name, some Irish personalities, such as Peter O'Toole chose to use it, but even Daras' own website spells it precisely the way it is spelt here.
There's a whole wealth of ways that people have chosen to spell his name, simply because he is Irish, adding accents over the 'O', inserted apostrophes etc, but I think the last say should really be his own.
Check out my YouTube channel/playlists and websites for present-truth materials, Three Angels' Messages and God's last-mercy warning to His people in these last days.
Papacy = Antichrist / Little Horn / Beast from the Sea
Roman Catholicism = Whore of Babylon
Investigative Judgement has commenced in 1844 (1st Angel’s Message)
Ellen G. White, 1827-1915 = End-time Prophet Sent of God
7th-day Sabbath = Seal of God
Sunday Worship to be Enforced as Mark of the Beast"
this is so true because i just watched the other video where he says this and there was abbout 50 comments saying that its 1.01 :L love the typing at the end :L love dara <3 hilarious
@bigbingham Even if they do get a percentge, which i doubt, the vast vast majority of it goes to youtube to pay for the servers we all use, you think the internet is free to run? Really? tell you what, you set up a server farm in your house which will cover 0.000001% of youtubes total users and see how much money you have at the end of the month,and calling them bastards for providing FREE content. Yes thats right, you might get an advert but you dont have to pay a penny.now whos the bastard?
@angel102ify ....the BBC i dont give a shit how much the BBC get. I pay a TV licence dont i so they can piss right off. Fine, advertise, border advertisements ok...but not compulsory prevideo adverts. They piss everyone off and will what make youtube fail in the end anyway. Granted it may cost a lot to run, but in the long run it will cost more youtubers to piss off to Google video.
@bigbingham and actually no, the TV licence does not cover items on youtube at all, never has and never will, the iplayer yes, but thats it as far as the internet goes and i dont remember seeing any adverts on that, have you?
do i hate adverts? yes they annoy me as well
do i understand that companies NEED adverts to pay for the services they provide? YES,
jesus, grow up and learn something about modern economics.....
@bigbingham oh and btw since you seem to think google video will take over maybe you should know that google is shutting down google videos themselves because it cant compete with youtube, since you seem to have such a problem with it i suggest you starting looking for alternatives now before its too late...
@SwindleMonkey No. There is no excuse to justify this atrocity!
I'm actually surprised no-one has highlighted the irony of me highlighting a mistake when I, myself, made a mistake in highlighting a mistake. So fuck it, I'll highlight it myself: "Cleary?!" *coughs* CLEARLY! Ah. That was cathartic.
@mrgringo22 They tend to do that quite a lot, I remember a while ago I saw a Jeremy Clarkson programme and he was talking to a bunch of different F1 drivers. They somehow managed to spell Rubens Barrichello's name as something like 'Reubens Barichelo'
@BoSsMaaN101 They have since corrected the spelling mistake, after I highlighted it. His name originally appeared as 'O Brien'.
I think you should have asked yourself why my original comment had received so many thumbs-up before attempting to deprecate me with your reply; because it has rendered you a fool, my sweet.
@mrgringo22 yeah just to back up others, they haven't mispelt Dara's surname, it is "Briain". Just with a " ' " between the O and Briain lol. Sorry if I am wrong, and you meant something else, but 171 thumbs up cannot be accepted here lol.
They should make an American version of this. Actually on second thought, they shouldn't because it would probably be terrible.
dhaddox 4 days ago 7
theres an episode where Dara loses it over Rich Hall making jokes about his name or something, can anyone recall which episode that is, Rich was doing his usual deadpan but Dara thought he was having a go and started losing it a little, any takers? Trying to find it again
bluejeckett 1 week ago in playlist Mitchell & Webb
with Dara's family name does it get pronounced o'breean -Iain is an alternative to Ian and I am wondering about this as i have never seen that family name before. (my name is Ian by the way )
baird55aus 1 week ago
By definition it is zero... The whole scale has just been moved by 0,01°C in the 1990.
So on old (pre 1990) thermometers you should "recalibrate" the scale by 0,01°C...
:-D
MartinBlass 1 week ago
"I know this is just a comedy show but i won't let that fucker get away with that!" Hahahaha epic :)
Speedy85 2 weeks ago
@Speedy85 fecker
bluejeckett 1 week ago in playlist Mitchell & Webb
My old physics teacher was one of the ones who emailed in.
MaxONEFIVENINETWO 3 weeks ago
Proof positive that it's not just the internet that's anal as fuck. *He says as he checks his spelling 400 times*
DigitalTwisted 1 month ago 2
@DigitalTwisted You missed a period near the end. :) Still a very fair point, as I'm phrasing this sentence very cautiously; even started it with "but" at first. Using a semi-colon is rather daring of me.
Ebkrem 1 month ago
adverts on bbc???
MRaserious1 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos
"When you were in school the definition of the triple point was not degrees centigrade." I got so confused then I was like ooooh... naught! I doesn't help how british people pronounce 'not' like 'naught'.
TheEyesOfNye 2 months ago
@TheEyesOfNye It's our language. Get used to it.
*I really hope i don't start a race war by saying this.*
Gavin17259 1 month ago
@Gavin17259 strangely enough if you knew a little about the history of English language. The English that Americans speak is closer to how England was 250 years ago than the English spoken today by Brits. When the Mayflower left with the puritans on board, everyone spoke the same, but English changed considerably due to the influences of Europe while in America it diversified much less.
Ribbo 1 month ago
@Ribbo I've never really thought about it like that before. I'm not sure if it's 100% true but it sounds feasible enough for me. Good day :)
Gavin17259 1 month ago
@Gavin17259 haha, a race war. between the white people over there and the white people over here. We're the same brotha, only difference is you guys talk funny.
I'm kidding of course!!!!!
TheEyesOfNye 3 weeks ago
@TheEyesOfNye Americans also use "naught," just not as often as our friends across the pond.
audball911 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheEyesOfNye Americans also use "naught," just not as often as our friends across the pond.
audball911 1 month ago
I love this show but the newest series is taking itself too seriously. I miss the times where the show had nobody but comedians on the panel. And seriously, stop bringing Sandy Toksvig on.
drumgroovy 2 months ago 10
Comment removed
MartinPurvis 3 months ago 72
@MartinPurvis It is the right spelling... except for the missing aposthrophe.
drumgroovy 2 months ago
@drumgroovy I'm very sorry, but it is not the right spelling.
MartinPurvis 2 months ago
@MartinPurvis What is it, then?
drumgroovy 2 months ago
@drumgroovy Naa it is the right spelling but it is wrong to miss out the apostrophe :P
MartinPurvis 2 months ago
@MartinPurvis It IS spelled correctly, there are two i's in his last name.
GerrohTheCommie 2 months ago
@GerrohTheCommie I think he might be referring to the Ó..
thesefilmswhatiwatch 1 month ago
@MartinPurvis They have. 59 idiots.
Hypergluco 2 weeks ago
@MartinPurvis Why, how do you spell Dara?
speebyda 1 week ago
@MartinPurvis They have just you and 72 idiots think otherwise.
kieranwestgate 5 days ago
i bet the guy who sent in that email feels so proud.
NayimKay 3 months ago 128
@NayimKay I would. Because obviously, It's more than a comedy show :)
LukeGeoDude 2 weeks ago
Wow. How much of a nerd do you have to be to send in THAT complaint!
xXx
ellenmelon771 3 months ago
I don't know what these guys are talking about. The triple point has to do with Temperature AND pressure. Meaning you can have a triple point at 0, 0.01, 10 or even 100 degrees Celsius depending on the pressure.
regginscanjump 3 months ago
@regginscanjump i'd say that like most standard temperatures, this would be at seal level (1014 kPa)
nuberiffic 2 months ago
OMG I want to move to britain.
SkyFortStudios 4 months ago
hahahaha!
gyped 4 months ago
What series and episode is this from
Unas1 4 months ago
@Unas1 series 3..... im pretty sure, cos i have series 2- which has the fact Fry was refering to.
gyped 4 months ago
@Unas1 Season 3 episode 12
DarenSankari 4 months ago
Religion is something left over from the infancy of our intelligence, it will fade away as we adopt reason and science as our guidelines.
haz464 5 months ago
@haz464 Religion and Science. The first stands on one big assumption/belief, while the latter stands on many smaller beliefs/assumptions. For all we know, it could all still be gnomes and magic. Just saying.
ntnima 5 months ago
@ntnima Wrong, you obviously have brain damage if you don't understand how science works. We have no evidence of gnomes and magic so obviously it is not how things work. Typical theists with their strawman arguments. Just saying.
haz464 5 months ago
@haz464 you are absolutely right
ntnima 5 months ago
@haz464 oh wait, hang on.. no you're not. I just rememberd the black swan theory. Imma take your warning about brain damage seriously though, and get meself a checkup
derp derp derp
ntnima 5 months ago
@ntnima Science relies on empirical evidence, not belief you dumb cunt. Although it's apparent to me you're a complete idiot since you can't even type properly :p Why don't you do your bit and kill yourself for the good of the gene pool?
haz464 5 months ago
@haz464 awww.. you're adorable. fear not. i shall castrate myself for the good of mankind asap.
I would have entered a respectable epidemiological debate with you. But, judging by your posts, that would be a futile move. So instead imma just continue to type like an idiot so as to allow you to vent your juvenile anger in this comment section...
c'mon keep insulting a complete stranger. gogogo you magnificent minded man. You comments are argumentative poetry to my ears.
derp derp derp
ntnima 5 months ago
@ntnima You see the problem here is you assume I am angry. What is actually happening is you are embarassing yourself by showing everyone you are a complete retard as evidenced by the fact that you don't even know what epidemiological means. Going to go out on a whim here and assume you meant epistemological, even then you don't make any sense because you didn't offer any cohesive arguments apart from "lol well mayb we're totally wrong!" Stay classy theist :p
derp derp derp
haz464 5 months ago
@haz464 nah bro. I am no theist. I am simply not a hardline atheist. u can consider me a humble agnostic, simply cause I would consider myself unscientific to believe in the nonexistence of god without conclusive evidence to that effect.
touche for the epistemological point (spell check fail)
I don't assume you're mad. I'm amused that you treat me like a theist. I'm also amused that you're under the impression that you are defending scientific rigorousness while talking with silly vulgarities.
ntnima 5 months ago
@ntnima It's not unscientific to be an atheist but nor is it unscientific to be agnostic either. The truth is we are so far away from a theory of everything that we can't yet know if deities exist or not, but given the extreme unlikeliness of any religions that have been imagined over the relatively short time sentient humans have existed then it is a safe assumption that deities don't exist. What I suppose we can agree on is that faith is a poor tool to understand the laws of our universe
haz464 5 months ago
@haz464 well, my point was that "a safe assumption" is not a definitive conclusion.
My initial post was drawing exactly on this thing. The fact that we choose to safely assume certain things in science is often overlooked. In fact most of the laws of physics apply only in idealized situations. Many of the scientific constants are best estimates (ergo the many smaller beliefs/assumptions)
But obviously science is much more useful and practical in understanding and engineering the world
ntnima 5 months ago
@ntnima True, but science is an ongoing process and is subject to constant refinement as we uncover more evidence and can prove things. It is very rare for science to be completely overhauled, only in extreme circumstances is this ever done like when we thought everything in the universe revolved around the Earth or that the Earth was flat. Until we know everything that can be known, then there will inevitably be a belief element in science
haz464 5 months ago
@haz464 knowledge is defined as "justified true belief"
religions were perhaps the first attempts to achieve a wholistic knowing. They had belief, they were crudely justified and were taken to be true.
same with science, through the scientific method. Belief is the hypothesis. Justified is the testing of said hypothesis. Whether it is true or not though is always up for debate. True truth is not as easy to find as one would think when you have to rigorously prove it.
ntnima 5 months ago
@ntnima
We see yellow flowers, bees see them as ultraviolet and bluey.
Science tells us what wavelength it is. That's truth. Colour is not a lie, but just an interpretation of something true. God is responsible for everything, whatever that is, is God, could be a god particle. But we know it's definitly not anything anyone knows. And therefore, the word is useless, and should be ignored. Hence why ignoring god is part of the scientific method.
superhamzah85 3 months ago
@haz464 anyway man, youtube comment boards are a retarded place to discus the gnostic esoterism, science, and the nature of knowledge. It's 4 in the morning and I feel like reading a book.
I'll let you have the last word. peace out
ntnima 5 months ago
@ntnima Yeah was just thinking the same thing tbh, sorry for the insults but it's rare to ever encounter anyone with any intelligence on youtube comments so I just assumed you were trolling/ignorant and got frustrated. see ya
haz464 5 months ago
@haz464 wow! i did not expect to find a well reasoned and intelligent (if a little vulgar at times) argument about the validity of science and religion whilst linking my way through youtube. i must say i'm impressed. you've both given me quite a lot to think about especially in reference to the "black swan theory" which i was unfamiliar with. thanks @ntnima and @haz464 :)
traybake1 5 months ago
@RSVJosephV you blatantly googled it first to check
hazzario 5 months ago
Fail.
gymnosophy 5 months ago
ᴸᴹᴬᴼ
seitenshow 5 months ago
@HiddenRainful "Do you think that it is morally correct to economically deprive a site"
I'm not actually depriving them of anything. Your argument is that ad companies could hypothetically pay less because I don't watch their ads and that I should let this hypothetical situation influence my behavior.
"which many people like myself enjoy and respect"
Relevance?
"because they use ads to support this site instead of charging viewers?"
False dichotomy. Plus charging for views would destroy them.
Antifides 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful There's starving people in the world, yet you argue with me over whether or not I should dedicate my time to making sure a mega-corporation gets more money. There's nothing left to say. Disagree with me if you like, I'm not your puppet to dance to your subjective moral values.
Antifides 6 months ago
@Antifides
Google is not a megacorporation.
can0mark 5 months ago
@can0mark This is true. I thought "megacorporation" basically meant "very large corporation" but it appears to be a more specific term.
Antifides 5 months ago
@HiddenRainful Your morality isn't the only morality. Just because you don't like my views doesn't make me immoral or selfish or immature. My opinion is different.
By the way, Youtube doesn't give us videos. All they do is provide a central viewing location.
I can't choose to go to a site where they use donations instead of advertising because no such site can survive with YouTube in existence.
Your attempt to badger me into your morality has been riddled with fallacies and assumptions.
Antifides 6 months ago
Comment removed
Mestherion 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful Oh, is that what direct insults mean? Let me show you the first insult in this conversation: "Stop being such a selfish cunt."
I didn't say it. You did. You should be careful not to make presumptuous statements about the intent behind an action when you've taken the action first because, while you can't establish that it applies to me, it's hard to argue that your own intent isn't the same as the one you presume.
I'm not obliged to watch their ads. Yay!
Antifides 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful "You don't seem to grasp the fact that the world does not cater to you."
You don't seem to grasp the fact that the world does not cater to YouTube, which was my entire point, you stupid fuck.
Antifides 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful What the hell do you think the INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT rates, exactly? And, damn it, stop saying stupid shit so I can stop correcting you.
Antifides 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful At any rate, I tried to end this conversation once, I just can't stand idiocy. I am going to try, though. No matter how imbecilic your reply, I think I will leave it be this time. Enjoy.
Antifides 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful I don't see how stating a fact is arrogant, especially when my intelligence has been called into question. I know what my IQ is and how that rates my intelligence against others. I can't believe you don't realize that not being able to imagine the relevance of imagination means you lack imagination. Demonstration of your lack of intelligence, I suppose. Imagination is involved in imagining alternatives to intrusive advertising. It's also useful in following a simple analogy.
Antifides 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful Your message was marked as spam, so I didn't see it until now. The fact that you don't see how imagination is relevant is an indicator of your lack of imagination.
Dumbarse.
You're a bit dim, aren'tcha?
Peace out :)
Antifides 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful Your lack of imagination is amusing, but I think it's time to end this conversation. No matter what I say, you won't get any more intelligent. Bye now.
Antifides 6 months ago
@Antifides
The level of HiddenRainful's intelligence apparently surpasses yours, be it unimportant. .
What they're saying is that YouTube hosts advertising space due requiring profit. If YouTube gains no profit, a subscription charge (or similar) will need to be introduced to regular users. If staff cannot be paid for their services, and YouTube partners cannot be paid, YouTube will no longer be able to provide a service to users without charge. HiddenRainful is correct, you are selfish.
TheDarkAngel1704 6 months ago
@TheDarkAngel1704 Oh, that's not likely. Very, very few people surpass my intelligence. In any case, you proposed a false dichotomy. It's not "either advertising or subscription charge." It's advertising in a variety of forms, of which I've only specified objection to one, or a subscription charge, or donations, or something that none of us has considered. The fact is, as long as advertising is an accepted means of receiving funds, no one will look for a better solution.
Antifides 6 months ago
@Antifides
All I have in response to that, is the following;
Keep dreaming.
TheDarkAngel1704 6 months ago
Comment removed
Mestherion 6 months ago
Comment removed
Antifides 6 months ago
@TheDarkAngel1704 Freaking Youtube marking messages as spam and not telling the poster about it. Another reason not to do anything for them.
As I said but you probably didn't see:
I will, because it's the big ideas that change the world, not the small-minded ruminations of complacent fools.
Antifides 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful I want Youtube to make a more ethical decision, and until they do, they won't be getting anything from me.
Antifides 6 months ago
If we were all you use fire fox/chrome don't you think companies would take heed of what people are doing and start putting advertisement on there.
So in retrospect it’s a good idea not to tell people that fire fox/chrome don’t have adverts.
peaka567 6 months ago
@peaka567 I'm pretty sure that Google, which owns both Youtube and Chrome, is well aware.
Mestherion 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful And yet the last time I made an analogy, you understood. Odd that. It's almost like the entire point of your posts are to draw out a disagreement. Have you considered living under a bridge and charging people for crossing it?
Antifides 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful Hah, nice, you think you're the arbiter of morality. In that case, I'll be the arbiter of morality: please stop letting Youtube kill people.
Antifides 6 months ago
Dara is a pure legend
Phoenix1664 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful Let me show you how polite you are.
Please stop living.
See, I asked politely, "seen"[sic] as I have a sense of morality. I'm not sure what morality has to do with politeness, though.
Antifides 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful I am not subject to your ideals. Since you want to impose them on me, you can adopt mine instead: start using ad-blocker or stop using Youtube,
Antifides 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful No.
Antifides 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful I wouldn't visit Youtube if I had to watch ads. Perhaps they should come up with a different system.
Besides, that's only a problem if the advertisers pay less because people block the ads.
Antifides 6 months ago
hahaha this is great because i had just watched the episode were Stephen gave him points for that fact!!
DCdabest 6 months ago
@HiddenRainful Youtube was up for a long time without ads that are as intrusive as they are now.
Besides, I don't think people care for ethics on the internet much nowadays.
Krazed2Kraze 6 months ago
@Krazed2Kraze YouTube was a loss-making enterprise for most of its early years. Just saying.
looseSpark 6 months ago
i thought the triplee point of water was 273.16K...
Caluma122 6 months ago
@Caluma122 both are right, measuring in kelvin is just a different way of doing it
mcpartridge 6 months ago
@mcpartridge Yeah i know i'm just joking
Caluma122 6 months ago
love this bit
iamXSTEALTHZX 6 months ago
There's no apostrophe between the 'O' and the 'Briain' in his name, some Irish personalities, such as Peter O'Toole chose to use it, but even Daras' own website spells it precisely the way it is spelt here.
There's a whole wealth of ways that people have chosen to spell his name, simply because he is Irish, adding accents over the 'O', inserted apostrophes etc, but I think the last say should really be his own.
SuperOfficerDibble 6 months ago 16
It's very close to zero and the pressure is different.
Water's state of matter is determined by temperature and pressure.
Magnetohydrodynamics 6 months ago
proud to be irish
windbreakerful 7 months ago
i love stephen fry and everyhing but he annoys me here cos he acts like he knows this when he clearly didnt
buffaloface1 7 months ago
@buffaloface1 He doesn't know everything. He knows damn near everything, but not quite everything lol.
TalesOfWar 6 months ago
This is what Dara's typing translates to:
"DGHSNLYG\LSUFGHUDHGLSIDHGURHGO8RYOTE5OUTY85YT45O8UY04I56406IUPOTY9YJCBKNVB9SRYTO3IYTOW8FYOE8YTWHYRC9F7YRGF8O3U4YLTFOE79F974YT976HT9YT98W6THP074YTUIRYHGFJ"
WebCamCartmell 7 months ago
@WebCamCartmell, you forgot the exclamation mark.
egorgeg 7 months ago
lool 0.01!! they took points off for that! :D
samirhym 7 months ago
This video has 32 dislikes. Why? People are very strange sometimes.
Pazma1 7 months ago 3
repeat 9 :D
disdroid 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my YouTube channel/playlists and websites for present-truth materials, Three Angels' Messages and God's last-mercy warning to His people in these last days.
Papacy = Antichrist / Little Horn / Beast from the Sea
Roman Catholicism = Whore of Babylon
Investigative Judgement has commenced in 1844 (1st Angel’s Message)
Ellen G. White, 1827-1915 = End-time Prophet Sent of God
7th-day Sabbath = Seal of God
Sunday Worship to be Enforced as Mark of the Beast"
SeventhDayRemnant 8 months ago
dara's our best comedian
Choomanama 8 months ago
Thumbs down for advert. BBCWorldwide? There should NO ads! For shame!
1111111k11111l111111 8 months ago
He got POINTS for that?!
SirrSnowman 8 months ago
shite advert and seen this clip ages ago ...so why bother?..plus only morons pay for tv..or watch sky
couthyband 8 months ago
@couthyband so you watch things the 21st century way....on a laptop/computer. you sir, are the moron
sayamg83 8 months ago
I think the more important question is why does the BBC only put up 240p videos, while the ripped off versions are all available in at least 360p?
Jeremy0459 8 months ago
gg the bbc can't even spell his name
z3r0t0l3r4ns 8 months ago
@z3r0t0l3r4ns They have spelled it correctly. They just used a latin O in his name.
TheMikeyReilly 8 months ago
Why do BBC clips have adverts?
willcollier01 8 months ago
It's Briain!!!
Songremixer123 8 months ago
ARGHHH King Arther no one cares that your broadband 'fiendishly' complicated!!
Diazreta 8 months ago 6
ahaha pure ambushed him lol
1989melkor 8 months ago
Awesome guy
corvdb1992 8 months ago
this is so true because i just watched the other video where he says this and there was abbout 50 comments saying that its 1.01 :L love the typing at the end :L love dara <3 hilarious
IrishMusic98 8 months ago
Dara looked so happy 7 seconds in D:
Yaymudkip 8 months ago
Just sprayed a mouth full of coffee all over my computer screen at work seeing Dara's angry typing....
jimjimbob123 9 months ago 8
''I'm not letting that fecker get away with that'' hahah
Diazreta 9 months ago 6
Dara's awesome
corvdb1992 9 months ago
Firefox x64 (minefield) 4.02 alpha 12
adblock plus and no script
Linux Ubuntu 11.04 beta 7
sweet pickings ;)
mika7367 9 months ago
You noobs need stop complaining and learn how to internet:
1: Download Firefox or Chrome
2: Download AdBlock Plus
3: Never have to watch/see an advert on the internet ever again
4: ???
5: Profit.
SuperSwifte 9 months ago 129
@SuperSwifte
I see we are of the same mind. Now if I just figure out that damned fourth step.....
Pazma1 7 months ago
@SuperSwifte IE noobs.
paft 7 months ago
@SuperSwifte "Learn how to internet" LOL wtf?
kikitikiboom 6 months ago
@SuperSwifte your my new favourite person in the world thank you so much
IIzRandom 6 months ago
@SuperSwifte To paraphrase Stephen Fry, "...and I use the word "Profit" quite wrongly."
michaeldoy 6 months ago
@SuperSwifte ah yes, the classic
maxxskill 6 months ago
@SuperSwifte I have FireFox and STILL have adverts. Explain.
mattissotrendy 6 months ago
@mattissotrendy adblock plus..?
bowersbros 6 months ago
HE GOT POINTS FOR THAT! *angry typing*
22295whiteangel 9 months ago 5
i will make a point NOT TO BUY ANYTHING that is ADVERTISED before a clip
silversurfur 9 months ago 8
im getting pissed off with this king arthur now
panzermort 9 months ago
Keep pushing 9.
ShoeProductions 9 months ago
I thought BBC didnt advertise...bastards.
bigbingham 9 months ago 6
@bigbingham the adverts are from youtube and have nothing to do with the BBC
angel102ify 9 months ago
@angel102ify
The producers of the video will recieve a premium for every view of the ad. The BBC agree to advertise on their videos.....thus the BBC are bastards.
bigbingham 9 months ago
@bigbingham Even if they do get a percentge, which i doubt, the vast vast majority of it goes to youtube to pay for the servers we all use, you think the internet is free to run? Really? tell you what, you set up a server farm in your house which will cover 0.000001% of youtubes total users and see how much money you have at the end of the month,and calling them bastards for providing FREE content. Yes thats right, you might get an advert but you dont have to pay a penny.now whos the bastard?
angel102ify 9 months ago
@angel102ify ....the BBC i dont give a shit how much the BBC get. I pay a TV licence dont i so they can piss right off. Fine, advertise, border advertisements ok...but not compulsory prevideo adverts. They piss everyone off and will what make youtube fail in the end anyway. Granted it may cost a lot to run, but in the long run it will cost more youtubers to piss off to Google video.
bigbingham 9 months ago
Comment removed
angel102ify 9 months ago
@bigbingham /facepalm
you know who owns youtube dont you?
*ninja edit because im tired
angel102ify 9 months ago
@bigbingham and actually no, the TV licence does not cover items on youtube at all, never has and never will, the iplayer yes, but thats it as far as the internet goes and i dont remember seeing any adverts on that, have you?
do i hate adverts? yes they annoy me as well
do i understand that companies NEED adverts to pay for the services they provide? YES,
jesus, grow up and learn something about modern economics.....
angel102ify 9 months ago
@bigbingham oh and btw since you seem to think google video will take over maybe you should know that google is shutting down google videos themselves because it cant compete with youtube, since you seem to have such a problem with it i suggest you starting looking for alternatives now before its too late...
angel102ify 9 months ago
@bigbingham google video is shutting down.
emikochan13 8 months ago
i love dara o brien too much
dubbadub100 9 months ago
@dubbadub100 not THAT much if you can't spell his name :D
moshpotpaul 9 months ago 3
You spelt his surname wrong? :)
cannypal 9 months ago
nice come-back by Dara
mrbarnowlful 10 months ago
fuck you brush foundation, I want steven fry.
doublecrosserfm 10 months ago
Always tell if Fry fakes his laugh...
1001000111 10 months ago
It's water, get over it.
MattPrior1 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The BBC have misspelt Dara's surname? Cleary, they're the feckers.
mrgringo22 10 months ago 209
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrgringo22 ...no they haven't?
Puzzlenaut 10 months ago
@mrgringo22 In their defense, it is quiet a hard surname to get right, unless your Irish, or informed
SwindleMonkey 10 months ago
@SwindleMonkey No. There is no excuse to justify this atrocity!
I'm actually surprised no-one has highlighted the irony of me highlighting a mistake when I, myself, made a mistake in highlighting a mistake. So fuck it, I'll highlight it myself: "Cleary?!" *coughs* CLEARLY! Ah. That was cathartic.
I'm afraid you're guilty, too, Swindle: *quite ;P
mrgringo22 10 months ago
@mrgringo22 That's the correct spelling dumbass.
RSVJosephV 8 months ago 14
@mrgringo22 yeah what are you talking about you BELLEND!
ThankssBitch 8 months ago
@mrgringo22 They didn't spell it wrong, it's Briain :p
IndieLuvsPopcorn 8 months ago
@mrgringo22 lol.. they didn't spell it wrong..
elliexx242 8 months ago
@elliexx242 Ah, it seems they have since corrected it. They originally spelt his surname 'Ó Brien'.
And for those who have lambasted me for my comment, ask yourselves why has it received so many likes.
TBYT.
mrgringo22 8 months ago 9
@mrgringo22 ahh fair enough, sorry (:
elliexx242 8 months ago
@mrgringo22 haha life's a bitch =P
el6caballo6oscuro6 7 months ago
@mrgringo22 They haven't...that's how It's spelt on Dara's DVD, unless his spelling his own name wrong ofcourse.
johnboy92 7 months ago 5
@johnboy92 They left out the fada, but it's better than it's usually spelt
degrandsreves 7 months ago
@mrgringo22 They tend to do that quite a lot, I remember a while ago I saw a Jeremy Clarkson programme and he was talking to a bunch of different F1 drivers. They somehow managed to spell Rubens Barrichello's name as something like 'Reubens Barichelo'
blainyrules 7 months ago
@mrgringo22 That's how his name is spelt, clearly you are a fecker....?
BoSsMaaN101 7 months ago 50
Comment removed
mrgringo22 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BoSsMaaN101 They have since corrected the spelling mistake, after I highlighted it. His name originally appeared as 'O Brien'.
I think you should have asked yourself why my original comment had received so many thumbs-up before attempting to deprecate me with your reply; because it has rendered you a fool, my sweet.
And I can't be a fecker for I'm not Irish.
Cheerio.
mrgringo22 5 months ago
@mrgringo22 yeah just to back up others, they haven't mispelt Dara's surname, it is "Briain". Just with a " ' " between the O and Briain lol. Sorry if I am wrong, and you meant something else, but 171 thumbs up cannot be accepted here lol.
RachyRooM 7 months ago
@mrgringo22 How should it be spelt?
Sailorsega 7 months ago
@Sailorsega With an apostrophe between the 'O' and the 'Briain' :P
AnnaRoberts9 7 months ago
@mrgringo22 Are you sure?
244Ohiro 7 months ago
@mrgringo22 No they haven't. It's his irish surname.
manaf17 7 months ago 7