Never heard that Hitler claimed that the Aryans came from Atlantis. In fact, Hitler didn't use the unscientific word "Aryan" after he came to power. (Germany was a mix of european race groups, alpins, nordic, dinaric, baltic and so on, so he used the word "aryan" to fit them all) But it's a fact that he claimed that the german people was created by God.
Watch six minutes in this clip: watch?v=PW1Jhw2hmVQ
Evolution is factually correct. The fossil evidence is clear and abundant.
The Bible by comparison is filled with contradictions, especially in the story of Adam and Eve, which makes next to no sense if you bother to analyze it...
To one and all, the 'person' known as Nephilimfree, is to be pitied! It is truly amazing that he can string two words together let alone two reasoned sentences in a row! The thing to do with this truly sick and perverted person is to ignore him and deny him access to any comments as he cannot provide the same. I realize that the idea is tolerance of the mentally challenged. But to provide said person with a platform for his inane and unreasoned ideas only stokes the fires of his hatred.
Just want to point out that Hitler (as well as Stalin) actually forbid his scientists to use Darwins theory of natural selection. He instead embraced Lamarck's theory of acquired traits (a giraffe gets its long neck by stretching it, and this is in turn inherited by its offspring, etc.)
@nephilimfree what i find so ironic about the comment your making is that Hitler was a self-proclaimed Roman Catholic and in many of his speeches said the bible told him to exterminate the jews! How could your link between atheism and the holocaust be more wrong? And btw, i would compare your blocking of people from your channel to Stalin's censorship, i.e. blocking them beacuse they oppose you view. Enjoying being ridiculed by intellectuals? you seem to be at the present
The full title is "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life," and it has nothing to do with races in the human sense. Even if it did, it would prove nothing. Darwin could be the most racist person ever it doesn't change the validity of the mechanism he described in the book, nor does it change the fact that species can evolve over time.
What more could you expect from a grown man who believes the sun goes around the earth and actually tried to justify infants and children having their brains bashed out on the ground and who claims to have cured an incurable disease.
I really wonder how this creepy moron manages to feed himself.
who told you we came from an ape-like ancestor and why did you believe them?
and don't say the fossil record sparky, that's all conjecture. do you know how many Evolutionists thought Aborigines weren't all human because of the shape of their skull?
and yes, morals have nothing to do with Science LOL
I can't use the fossil record? :(....I guess all I have left is complex iteration, embryonic development, comparative anatomy, comparative genomics, retro-virus, and geographical distribution.
"Aborigines weren't all human"
That claim was made by a creationist who later became an 'evolutionist'.
"I guess all I have left is complex iteration, embryonic development, comparative anatomy, comparative genomics, retro-virus, and geographical distribution." - none of those point to humans coming from ape-like creatures, much less life being spawned by lightning and mud.
and there were much more people who believed that about Aborigines and Africans than that one "guy".
even -if- Evolution is true, it will never get rid of God.
not a red herring, just a fact.... the origin of Evolution was spawned by people who rejected God -AND- were racist. if you embrace the idea that the most evolved must survive, and the less evolved must die off, then you are "naturally" racist.
Actually, everything currently living is equally evolved. Every living organism on earth has, approximately, 3.8 billion years of evolution backing it up. A cockroach or a flatworm has just as much evolution behind it as you or I, though cockroaches and flatworms are less complex than you and I are. Any one who actually believes "less evolved" species or members of a species must die off or be killed is simply twisting evolution to fit in with their own agenda.
@CapnnOrdinary "CapnnOrdinary has been terminated because we received multiple third-party claims of copyright infringement regarding material the user posted." Hahahaha loser.
@CapnnOrdinary Evolution is a fact. Science does not comment on the supernatural. Sorry that scienitsts keep discovering things that prove the bible wrong.
"On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life."
oh,and for my "45%" comment, you used only about 10 words from the title, which actually has about 21 words. you used a little less than half of the title.... which comes to about 45%.
"comes to about 45%." I knew you couldn't do math. So, how does that say he's racist? Natural selection has favoured species which are best adapted. He doesn't talk about whites or blacks.
So again, where is the evidence of Darwin being a racist?
So you honestly have absolutely nothing to nail him on a racist charge eh? What about his protests against the conditions forced upon native inhabitants by the British in their colonies?
I guess that makes him racist too? What about his disgust of slavery? Is that racist? What do you have that actually means the man is racist, or evolution is wrong. You have NOTHING.
You think you have something because you're an idiot, regardless of how correct you THINK you are. Evidence, or shut up.
Just a tidbit of info... after watching a few of your vids I went to check out neph... I made 2 or 3 thoughtful and gentle disagreeing comments - no offensive anything... i think i might have said that most reasonable people are at least agnostic if they aren't atheist - which could be slightly offensive, but that was THE most pointed thing I stated... now he's blocked me! WTF?!
Its repulsive to me that morons like neph would try to lay blame for the holocaust on atheists while themselves defending a movement which is has left behind it the largest and longest wake of human suffering ever witnessed by humanity.
Hitler, Stalin, pol pot and their movements were destroyed for their evil, and only fringe nuts still give any support to them. Religion while just as guilty is still inflicting its terror on fellow humans.
After I listed an observed transitional species of water flea on an idiotic NPage85 video that fit the narrow definition Nephilim set up he did an LOL and told me that all I needed was video of the event to prove it. When I told him that what I was really pining for was the acceptance of a balding middle-aged religious fanatic who could easily play a pedophile on a crappy TV drama NPage85 blocked all my comments. Amazing how sensitive people are even when they are protected by almighty beings.
NephilimFree blocked me for being ignorant about evolution... which is ironic since I'm a PhD research biologist with a specialty in viral evolution...
I was correcting his definition of transitional species, which of course don't exist. Then I denied a meaningful 'kinds' definition, and that got me blocked.
I'm an archaeologist and he ignored everything I said reference his Nephilic 'evidence. One part of which was questioning the veracity of using the stautes at Mameyev Kurgan as 'evidence' that prehistoric giants existed. The man is a coward as well as a liar.
It is not possible to support a creationist position without lying and deleting comments. NephilimFree is just doing what he has to do in order to maintain the illusion of credibility.
Yeah, nice attempt to try and turn my video against me.
My points were that Eugenics is not supported by evolution. And you can not disprove a scientific theory by claiming that someone can manipulate it for their own purposes.
can you believe this loser!hes trying to make a name of himself by attacking religious people.i love you man,together we can share a laugh at this bozo's expense.peace.
@NephilimFree The sheer beauty of this, is you aren't able to censor me telling you to fuck yourself with a magic super-liquid nozzle the size of K-2.
If you're going to lash out at me because they reveal the evils of evolutionism, at least keep the information honest. What is it about your dedication to evolutionism that compells you to lie about what people say when you lash out?
When did you go wrong in thinking such behavior benefits you?
If you consider my video to be "lashing out" than you have a very low tolerance for criticism.
I am using your own words and actions. How is this lying?
Given your hastily composed messages, it seems you took quite offense to what I said. While "ThetaOmega's Personal Creationist Bitch" is admittedly bellicose, I do not feel apologetic. Once again you have proven that your only recourse is ad hominems and strawmen.
Dude, you said i said something that i did not say. That's dishonest. Why are evolutionists compelled to be dishonest? You know, it's that same dishonesty that has you believing (so you say) in evolution. Evolutionist scientist are chronic liars. And yes, I can prove that. It's all quite sad actually. I suggest this: If you can't be honest, GET OFF THE INTERNET.
Sorry, if you can not point out where I lied than I did not.
I hope you do not stop making videos. Some are quite entertaining. I can not finish most of them, but the creepiness and the delusional nature of them is fun to watch some times.
@NephilimFree I find it both hilarious, and depressing that you continually lie on youtube, jerk off to stockings, and leach money from your friend Sharon. --All in that same room!
I do not know if he will notice it, if he does he probably will ignore or misquote you. Or perhaps he will just lie. We've already seen him do all of these things.
I look forward to your non-parody response. I am sure it will be much more detailed than my quicky.
Remember, this guy does not represent us Americans!
This has been flagged as spam show
If you think evolution is false, then you don't understand evolution.
biggingeryeti 9 months ago
Never heard that Hitler claimed that the Aryans came from Atlantis. In fact, Hitler didn't use the unscientific word "Aryan" after he came to power. (Germany was a mix of european race groups, alpins, nordic, dinaric, baltic and so on, so he used the word "aryan" to fit them all) But it's a fact that he claimed that the german people was created by God.
Watch six minutes in this clip: watch?v=PW1Jhw2hmVQ
Gumbypotty 1 year ago
Evolution is factually correct. The fossil evidence is clear and abundant.
The Bible by comparison is filled with contradictions, especially in the story of Adam and Eve, which makes next to no sense if you bother to analyze it...
formless777 1 year ago
To one and all, the 'person' known as Nephilimfree, is to be pitied! It is truly amazing that he can string two words together let alone two reasoned sentences in a row! The thing to do with this truly sick and perverted person is to ignore him and deny him access to any comments as he cannot provide the same. I realize that the idea is tolerance of the mentally challenged. But to provide said person with a platform for his inane and unreasoned ideas only stokes the fires of his hatred.
journeyer58 1 year ago
tbh times wasted if someone is soo stuck in their beliefs, whatever they are.
treemarble 1 year ago
Just want to point out that Hitler (as well as Stalin) actually forbid his scientists to use Darwins theory of natural selection. He instead embraced Lamarck's theory of acquired traits (a giraffe gets its long neck by stretching it, and this is in turn inherited by its offspring, etc.)
greyman000 1 year ago
Evilutionist, lawlz.
LostManSays 1 year ago
@nephilimfree what i find so ironic about the comment your making is that Hitler was a self-proclaimed Roman Catholic and in many of his speeches said the bible told him to exterminate the jews! How could your link between atheism and the holocaust be more wrong? And btw, i would compare your blocking of people from your channel to Stalin's censorship, i.e. blocking them beacuse they oppose you view. Enjoying being ridiculed by intellectuals? you seem to be at the present
SMTsquidge 1 year ago
Was the "pie for the course" or "par for the course".
fknNukE 1 year ago
You'll never convince the willfully ignorant of anything they don't want to hear. But you can expose them for the uneducated hypocrites they are.
MikeSkullman 1 year ago
The full title is "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life," and it has nothing to do with races in the human sense. Even if it did, it would prove nothing. Darwin could be the most racist person ever it doesn't change the validity of the mechanism he described in the book, nor does it change the fact that species can evolve over time.
stingernick 2 years ago
I vote CCL - Creepy Creationist Liar.
htoontube 2 years ago
Subscribed
ricardas83 2 years ago
I thought that hitler used Lamarck's ideas as a grounds for his ideology, not Darwins?
Zetimenvec 2 years ago
Yep nephs a special kind of idiot.
What more could you expect from a grown man who believes the sun goes around the earth and actually tried to justify infants and children having their brains bashed out on the ground and who claims to have cured an incurable disease.
I really wonder how this creepy moron manages to feed himself.
mp9yq9tx 2 years ago
JRChadwick, do you know what the ENTIRE title is to Darwin's "the Origins of the Species" is?
"On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life."
bam, Darwin was racist and believed in eugenics. Evolution was spawned from hate and ignorance.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago 3
"do you know what the ENTIRE title is to Darwin's "the Origins of the Species" is?"
Why do creationists act as if they have breaking news?
Landofjello 2 years ago
why do Atheists act as if the "Theory of Evolution" wasn't spawned from racism?
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago 3
Does that mean evolution didn't happen? Tell me what morals have to do with science.
(I bet you wont respond, typical)
Landofjello 2 years ago
who told you we came from an ape-like ancestor and why did you believe them?
and don't say the fossil record sparky, that's all conjecture. do you know how many Evolutionists thought Aborigines weren't all human because of the shape of their skull?
and yes, morals have nothing to do with Science LOL
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago 4
"and don't say the fossil record"
I can't use the fossil record? :(....I guess all I have left is complex iteration, embryonic development, comparative anatomy, comparative genomics, retro-virus, and geographical distribution.
"Aborigines weren't all human"
That claim was made by a creationist who later became an 'evolutionist'.
Landofjello 2 years ago
"I guess all I have left is complex iteration, embryonic development, comparative anatomy, comparative genomics, retro-virus, and geographical distribution." - none of those point to humans coming from ape-like creatures, much less life being spawned by lightning and mud.
and there were much more people who believed that about Aborigines and Africans than that one "guy".
even -if- Evolution is true, it will never get rid of God.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago 5
"it will never get rid of God."
You're making a statement atheists and theistic evolutionists have been saying since the dawn of time.
/watch?v=KnJX68ELbAY
You're speaking as if it's breaking news.
"none of those point to humans coming from ape-like creatures"
It baffles me how you feel qualified to overthrow what scientists consider definitive proof that evolution happens by just asserting that it isn't.
"and there were much more people who believed that about Aborigines and Africans"
Landofjello 2 years ago
"and there were much more people who believed that about Aborigines and Africans"
Wait a minute, what is relevance? I'm deeming this a red herring (and I fell for it)
Landofjello 2 years ago
not a red herring, just a fact.... the origin of Evolution was spawned by people who rejected God -AND- were racist. if you embrace the idea that the most evolved must survive, and the less evolved must die off, then you are "naturally" racist.
sorry.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago 4
The Constitution was also spawned largely by people who rejected God -AND- were racist.
Leehofooks 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure they rejected christianity, and were largely deists, not atheists.
but yeah, they were fairly racist.
Zetimenvec 2 years ago
Actually, everything currently living is equally evolved. Every living organism on earth has, approximately, 3.8 billion years of evolution backing it up. A cockroach or a flatworm has just as much evolution behind it as you or I, though cockroaches and flatworms are less complex than you and I are. Any one who actually believes "less evolved" species or members of a species must die off or be killed is simply twisting evolution to fit in with their own agenda.
sorry.
Formosus111 2 years ago
Don't be silly creatard,stop bearing false witness.Lying for jebus don't make it right.
You do know you are an embarassment to thinking people?
Science is neither for or agin the superntural,it goes where the evidence is even if its not pleasant,personal feelings don't come into it.
But your lying pastors tell you atheism is a religion,more false witness.
Grow the fuck up.
Rockster969 2 years ago
you don't know Truth brah, but thanks for trying to help me in a very loving Atheistic way!
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CapnnOrdinary "CapnnOrdinary has been terminated because we received multiple third-party claims of copyright infringement regarding material the user posted." Hahahaha loser.
mmmmmarcus 1 year ago
Abiogenesis does not say life was created by lightening striking mud. I'd love to see the paper you got that idea from..
Oh wait, you got it from expelled, too bad they don't tell you the name of the paper that says that either... Oh yeah, cause it doesn't exist!
You folks are the ones that believe we came from dirt, remember. You folks.
BusinessIDBAI 2 years ago
@CapnnOrdinary Um, yeah, comparative genomics kind of DOES point to humans coming from ape like creatures.
Juxtaroberto 1 year ago
@CapnnOrdinary Evolution is a fact. Science does not comment on the supernatural. Sorry that scienitsts keep discovering things that prove the bible wrong.
gregrutz 2 months ago
because it's not
Zetimenvec 2 years ago
Darwin actually argued against the treatment the British colonial governments issued against the native populations.
CapnnOrdinary, lets see your sources for Darwin being a racist, or believing in eugenics.
BusinessIDBAI 2 years ago
Business, how 'bout looking up the FULL title to Darwin's "Origin of the Species................. ->"
but believe what you want, i'm tired of arguing.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
How does the full title prove he's a racist? Let's see your proof, and evidence to support it. Lets drop the damn assertions. Prove it.
BusinessIDBAI 2 years ago
stop being a baby and go look at the full title and come back here and type it in for everyone to see.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
How does that prove he's a racist? "The origin of species: By means of natural selection" Amazingly racist.
BusinessIDBAI 2 years ago
that's only 45% of the title... dig deeper bud. if you can't find it, let me know and i will show you... *hint* try looking it up on Wiki.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
Oh my god, you can figure out math but not biology?! How'd you figure out math! Can you show me the equation you used to get 45%?
I'm very interested.
BusinessIDBAI 2 years ago
this is what you are now trying to avoid.
"On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life."
oh,and for my "45%" comment, you used only about 10 words from the title, which actually has about 21 words. you used a little less than half of the title.... which comes to about 45%.
my work is done here, goodbye.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
"comes to about 45%." I knew you couldn't do math. So, how does that say he's racist? Natural selection has favoured species which are best adapted. He doesn't talk about whites or blacks.
So again, where is the evidence of Darwin being a racist?
BusinessIDBAI 2 years ago
my work is not yet done i see.
yes, it is about 45%.... 47% to be exact.. you are desperate to try and be right about something here aren't you?
are you blind? what does "Preservation of Favored Races" mean to you?
now i am done... you either recognize it or you continue to be willfully ignorant. peace out.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
So you honestly have absolutely nothing to nail him on a racist charge eh? What about his protests against the conditions forced upon native inhabitants by the British in their colonies?
I guess that makes him racist too? What about his disgust of slavery? Is that racist? What do you have that actually means the man is racist, or evolution is wrong. You have NOTHING.
You think you have something because you're an idiot, regardless of how correct you THINK you are. Evidence, or shut up.
BusinessIDBAI 2 years ago
@CapnnOrdinary That doesn't make it false.
biggingeryeti 9 months ago
I like how the image for this is nice and menacing.
Internetaccount133 2 years ago
Just a tidbit of info... after watching a few of your vids I went to check out neph... I made 2 or 3 thoughtful and gentle disagreeing comments - no offensive anything... i think i might have said that most reasonable people are at least agnostic if they aren't atheist - which could be slightly offensive, but that was THE most pointed thing I stated... now he's blocked me! WTF?!
rentedhalo 2 years ago
Its repulsive to me that morons like neph would try to lay blame for the holocaust on atheists while themselves defending a movement which is has left behind it the largest and longest wake of human suffering ever witnessed by humanity.
Hitler, Stalin, pol pot and their movements were destroyed for their evil, and only fringe nuts still give any support to them. Religion while just as guilty is still inflicting its terror on fellow humans.
mp9yq9tx 2 years ago
After I listed an observed transitional species of water flea on an idiotic NPage85 video that fit the narrow definition Nephilim set up he did an LOL and told me that all I needed was video of the event to prove it. When I told him that what I was really pining for was the acceptance of a balding middle-aged religious fanatic who could easily play a pedophile on a crappy TV drama NPage85 blocked all my comments. Amazing how sensitive people are even when they are protected by almighty beings.
ImTheGrey 3 years ago
NephilimFree blocked me for being ignorant about evolution... which is ironic since I'm a PhD research biologist with a specialty in viral evolution...
I was correcting his definition of transitional species, which of course don't exist. Then I denied a meaningful 'kinds' definition, and that got me blocked.
joemarklawson 3 years ago 10
I'm an archaeologist and he ignored everything I said reference his Nephilic 'evidence. One part of which was questioning the veracity of using the stautes at Mameyev Kurgan as 'evidence' that prehistoric giants existed. The man is a coward as well as a liar.
falchion49 3 years ago 2
@joemarklawson anyone that say's anything against what he says gets blocked
neil182sr 6 months ago
@neil182sr If you haven't been blocked by Nephi you are a wimp.
gregrutz 2 months ago
@gregrutz i got got blocked by the trinity, neph, shock and ppsimmons
neil182sr 2 months ago
It is not possible to support a creationist position without lying and deleting comments. NephilimFree is just doing what he has to do in order to maintain the illusion of credibility.
happyjesus123 3 years ago
Yep, and I will not let him get away with it.
JRChadwick 3 years ago
@happyjesus123 I wouldn't say doing so gives him any illusion of credibility, his content and "arguements" shattered that long ago.
MeBeMat 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oh, and thanks for the free advertising. CYA!
NephilimFree 3 years ago
Yeah, nice attempt to try and turn my video against me.
My points were that Eugenics is not supported by evolution. And you can not disprove a scientific theory by claiming that someone can manipulate it for their own purposes.
JRChadwick 3 years ago
can you believe this loser!hes trying to make a name of himself by attacking religious people.i love you man,together we can share a laugh at this bozo's expense.peace.
stonedcommander 3 years ago
I am not attacking religious people, indeed the girl you saw in my video is very religious and even she thinks you are absolutely ridiculous.
JRChadwick 3 years ago
Hey, stoned! Why are planets round? XD
Johannes9126 3 years ago
One word: GRAVITY!
FSAthe1st 3 years ago
You know, I have since added two more parts to this series.
JRChadwick 3 years ago
@JRChadwick
I hope that NephilimFree is just trolling.
If he actually means any of what he says, then...
There are only so many words I can muster from my vocabulary to explain his condition.
Ilperon 1 year ago
@NephilimFree the last thing you should want is more advertising.It's just more people for you to block.And more people to laugh at you.
SantaSyndrome 1 year ago
@NephilimFree The sheer beauty of this, is you aren't able to censor me telling you to fuck yourself with a magic super-liquid nozzle the size of K-2.
mmmmmarcus 1 year ago
@NephilimFree go eat a dick
lequaie1234 1 year ago
If you're going to lash out at me because they reveal the evils of evolutionism, at least keep the information honest. What is it about your dedication to evolutionism that compells you to lie about what people say when you lash out?
When did you go wrong in thinking such behavior benefits you?
NephilimFree 3 years ago
If you consider my video to be "lashing out" than you have a very low tolerance for criticism.
I am using your own words and actions. How is this lying?
Given your hastily composed messages, it seems you took quite offense to what I said. While "ThetaOmega's Personal Creationist Bitch" is admittedly bellicose, I do not feel apologetic. Once again you have proven that your only recourse is ad hominems and strawmen.
JRChadwick 3 years ago
Dude, you said i said something that i did not say. That's dishonest. Why are evolutionists compelled to be dishonest? You know, it's that same dishonesty that has you believing (so you say) in evolution. Evolutionist scientist are chronic liars. And yes, I can prove that. It's all quite sad actually. I suggest this: If you can't be honest, GET OFF THE INTERNET.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
Sorry, if you can not point out where I lied than I did not.
I hope you do not stop making videos. Some are quite entertaining. I can not finish most of them, but the creepiness and the delusional nature of them is fun to watch some times.
JRChadwick 3 years ago
"Dude, you said i said something that i did not say. That's dishonest."
- I can't help but think you are projecting.
"If you can't be honest, GET OFF THE INTERNET."
- Words to live by Nephie. Take your own advice.
Atriviality 3 years ago 2
So, you blocked me... again. Going to accuse me of posting nasty messages again?
JRChadwickA 3 years ago
he did not say ANYTHING in this video that you are supposed to have said! NOTHING! so where is he dishonest?
antiantiantifahool 3 years ago
@NephilimFree I find it both hilarious, and depressing that you continually lie on youtube, jerk off to stockings, and leach money from your friend Sharon. --All in that same room!
mmmmmarcus 1 year ago
@NephilimFree wow,an Xtian being a smartass. Better repent or You'll go to hell boy! lol. pfftt
asmodeous9 1 year ago
The real question is why do you insist on telling bald-faced lies?
EtaCarinae22 3 years ago
Talk about projection,lol! My,you do look natty in that bitch gimp suit Theta Omega got you to wear Nephy.
Your arse must look like a fucking colander it's had so many new holes ripped in it.
Rockster969 2 years ago
Show me where I said one species MUST defeat another. :D
I said evolution theory states that it takes place, not that it MUST. However! It does does happen! It's called competition!
I even quoted a few evo witch doctors stating so for your education. Information always defeats outright lies Sporty.
I never said anything about Atlantis either.
Tisk tisk.
I think you are sad and worthy of pity.
I will pray for you.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
I never said that you said either of those things.
You said that Evolution supports Eugenics. I explained how the definitions are different.
What you just posted about Evolution is also untrue. Why don't you take a few minutes to type Evolution into Wikipedia?
I stated that HITLER claimed that the master race was descended from Atlantis. You just implied that you are Hitler! Lol.
JRChadwick 3 years ago
Lol, "Theta Omega's Personal Creationist Bitch"
Has a nice ring to it, how much you willing to bet he won't notice the video description of my response that says "NEPHILIMFREE CLICK "MORE INFO""
I will be uploading an official non-parody response to his video in due course.
ThetaOmega 3 years ago
I am glad you like it!
I do not know if he will notice it, if he does he probably will ignore or misquote you. Or perhaps he will just lie. We've already seen him do all of these things.
I look forward to your non-parody response. I am sure it will be much more detailed than my quicky.
Remember, this guy does not represent us Americans!
JRChadwick 3 years ago